Exposure of the lungs in breast cancer radiotherapy: A systematic review of lung doses published 2010-2015

Deep learning-based prediction of the dose-volume histograms for volumetric modulated arc therapy of left-sided breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The advancements in artificial intelligence and computational power have made deep learning an attractive tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. Deep learning has the potential to significantly simplify the trial-and-error process involved in inverse planning required by modern treatment techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, we explore the ability of deep learning to predict organ-at-risk (OAR) dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing VMAT treatment based solely on their anatomical characteristics. The predicted DVHs could be used to derive patient-specific dose constraints and dose objectives, streamlining the treatment planning process, standardizing the quality of the plans, and personalizing the treatment planning.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based framework for the prediction of organ-specific dose-volume histograms (DVH) based on structures delineated for left-sided breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

We used a dataset of 249 left-sided breast cancer patients treated with tangential VMAT fields. We extracted delineated structures and dose distributions for each patient and derived slice-by-slice DVHs for planning target volume (PTV) and organs-at-risk. The patients were divided into training (70%, n = 174), validation (10%, n = 24), and test (20%, n = 51) sets. Collected data were used to train a deep learning model for the prediction of the DVHs based on the delineated structures. The developed deep learning model comprised a modified DenseNet architecture followed by a recurrent neural network.

RESULTS

In the independent test set (n = 51), the point-wise differences in the slice-by-slice DVHs between the clinical and predicted DVHs were small; the mean squared errors were 3.53, 1.58, 2.28, 3.37, and 1.44 [×10-4] for PTV, heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast, respectively. With the derived cumulative DVHs, the mean absolute difference ± standard deviation of mean doses between the clinical and the predicted DVH were 0.08 ± 0.04 Gy, 0.24 ± 0.22 Gy, 0.73 ± 0.46 Gy, 0.07 ± 0.06 Gy, and 0.14 ± 0.14 Gy for PTV, heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The deep learning-based approach enabled automatic and reliable prediction of the DVH based on delineated structures. The predicted DVHs could potentially serve as patient-specific clinical goals used to aid treatment planning and avoid suboptimal plans or to derive optimization objectives and constraints for automated treatment planning.

Dose constraints in breast cancer radiotherapy. A critical review

Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Recent advances in treatment technology and radiobiological knowledge have a major impact in BC patients with locoregional disease as the majority are now long-term survivors. Over the last three decades, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques, together with the increasing adoption of moderately hypofractionated and ultra-hypofractionated treatment schedules as well as the possibility to offer partial breast radiotherapy to a well-defined patient subset have significantly changed radiotherapy for BC patients. As dose-volume constraints (DVCs) have to be adapted to these new treatment paradigms we have reviewed available evidence-based data concerning dose-constraints for the main organs at risk (OARs) that apply to the treatment of whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy, whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) and partial breast irradiation (PBI), for the most relevant fractionation schedules that have been introduced recently. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary that may help to harmonize treatment planning strategies.

Estimated Doses to the Heart, Lungs and Oesophagus and Risks From Typical UK Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer During 2015-2023

PURPOSE

Breast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risks of heart disease, lung cancer and oesophageal cancer. At present, the best dosimetric predictors of these risks are mean doses to the whole heart, lungs and oesophagus, respectively. We aimed to estimate typical doses to these organs and resulting risks from UK breast cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of planned or delivered mean doses to the whole heart, lungs or oesophagus from UK breast cancer radiotherapy in studies published during 2015-2023. Average mean doses were summarised for combinations of laterality and clinical targets. Heart disease and lung cancer mortality risks were then estimated using established models.

RESULTS

For whole heart, thirteen studies reported 2893 doses. Average mean doses were higher in left than in right-sided radiotherapy and increased with extent of clinical targets. For left-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 2.0 Gy (range 1.2-8.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 2.7 Gy (range 0.6-5.6 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 2.9 Gy (range 1.3-4.7 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For right-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 1.0 Gy (range 0.3-1.0 Gy) breast/chest wall and 1.2 Gy (range 1.0-1.4 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes. There were no whole heart dose estimates from right internal mammary radiotherapy. For whole lung, six studies reported 2230 doses. Average mean lung doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 2.6 Gy (range 1.4-3.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 3.0 Gy (range 0.9-5.1 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 7.1 Gy (range 6.7-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For whole oesophagus, two studies reported 76 doses. Average mean oesophagus doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 1.4 Gy (range 1.0-2.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 5.8 Gy (range 1.9-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary.

CONCLUSIONS

The typical doses to these organs may be combined with dose-response relationships to estimate radiation risks. Estimated 30-year absolute lung cancer mortality risks from modern UK breast cancer radiotherapy for patients irradiated when aged 50 years were 2-6% for long-term continuing smokers, and <1% for non-smokers. Estimated 30-year mortality risks for heart disease were <1%.

Correlation of new two-dimensional geometrical parameters to lung and heart dose-volume parameters in breast cancer radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To develop new two-dimensional geometric parameters for pulmonary and cardiac dose estimation in left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy without dose-volume histogram (DVH).

METHODS

On the CT image of 90 patients with left breast cancer, treatment planning was performed using two opposed tangent fields with/without supraclavicular. The field-in-field technique and 6MV photons were used. From DVH dosimetric parameters of mean dose, Vx (x (Gy) =5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50) were calculated, and from heart and lung outlines on the beam's eye view, new geometric parameters of percent of lung area in tangent and supraclavicular fields (%area of the lung in the tangent (ALT), %ALS) and percent of heart in tangent field (%area of the heart in the tangent (AHT)) were measured. Correlation, regression, and diagnostic performance by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were investigated for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The Pearson coefficient between %ALT and Vx (x = 10, 15, 20, 30, 40) show strong correlation in patient treatment with only opposed tangents (>0.85) and weaker in treatment by opposed tangents with supraclavicular (0.56-0.88), the %ALS indicate weak correlation (<0.5) and %AHT show strong correlation (0.93-0.98). The regression analysis shows a positive relation between %ALT and mean dose (R2 = 0.8), V20Gy (R2 = 0.9) in the lung (tangent treatment), and between %AHT and mean dose (R2 = 0.9), V20Gy (R2 = 1.0) in the heart. The ROC analysis shows by %ALT <20.3 for treatment by just opposed fields, %ALT <22.1% for treatment tangents with supra, and %AHT <11.6%, practical lung and heart dose constraints are addressed.

CONCLUSION

The proposed geometric parameters could replace previous one-dimensional maximum and central distances for predicting doses to lung and heart.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study presents simple geometric parameters that could estimate pulmonary and cardiac dose in left breast cancer treatment from a 2D radiograph.

Dosimetric analysis of six whole-breast irradiation techniques in supine and prone positions

In breast cancer radiation therapy, minimizing radiation-related risks and toxicity is vital for improving life expectancy. Tailoring radiotherapy techniques and treatment positions can reduce radiation doses to normal organs and mitigate treatment-related toxicity. This study entailed a dosimetric comparison of six different external beam whole-breast irradiation techniques in both supine and prone positions. We selected fourteen breast cancer patients, generating six treatment plans in both positions per patient. We assessed target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) doses to evaluate the impact of treatment techniques and positions. Excess absolute risk was calculated to estimate potential secondary cancer risk in the contralateral breast, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral lung. Additionally, we analyzed the distance between the target volume and OARs (heart and ipsilateral lung) while considering the treatment position. The results indicate that prone positioning lowers lung exposure in X-ray radiotherapy. However, particle beam therapies (PBTs) significantly reduce the dose to the heart and ipsilateral lung regardless of the patient's position. Notably, negligible differences were observed between arc-delivery and static-delivery PBTs in terms of target conformity and OAR sparing. This study provides critical dosimetric evidence to facilitate informed decision-making regarding treatment techniques and positions.

Organ-sparing techniques and dose-volume constrains used in breast cancer radiation therapy - Results from European and Latin American surveys

Background

Advances in local and systemic therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC), leading to a possible increased risk for postoperative radiation therapy (RT) late adverse events. The most adequate technologies and dose constraints for organs at risk (OAR) in BC RT have yet to be defined.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) practicing in Europe and Latin America including the Caribbean (LAC) through personal contacts, RO and BC professional groups' networks. Demographic data and clinical practice information were collected.

Results

 The study included 585 responses from ROs practicing in 57 different countries. The most frequently contoured OAR by European and LAC participants were the whole heart (96.6 % and 97.7 %), the ipsilateral (84.3 % and 90.8 %), and contralateral lung (71.3 % and 77.4 %), whole lung (69.8 % and 72.9 %), and the contralateral breast (66.4 % and. 83.2 %). ESTRO guidelines were preferred in Europe (33.3 %) and the RTOG contouring guideline was the most popular in LAC (62.2 %), while some participants used both recommendations (13.2 % and 19.2 %). IMRT (68.6 % and 59.1 %) and VMAT (65.6 % and 60.2 %) were the preferred modalities used in heart sparing strategies, followed by deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) (54.8 % and 37.4 %) and partial breast irradiation (PBI) (41.6 % and 24.6 %). Only a small percentage of all ROs reported the dose-volume constraints for OAR used in routine clinical practice. A mean heart dose (Heart-Dmean) between 4 and 5 Gy was the most frequently reported parameter (17.2 % and 39.3 %).

Conclusion

 The delineation approaches and sparing techniques for OAR in BC RT vary between ROs worldwide. The low response rate to the dose constraints subset of queries reflects the uncertainty surrounding this topic and supports the need for detailed consensus recommendations in the clinical practice.

Pulmonary fibrosis prevalence after adjuvant radiotherapy of Iranian patients with breast cancer: A single-center cross-sectional study

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the incidence rate of pulmonary fibrosis as a late radiotherapy complication and identify the associated dosimetric and demographic factors using radiological findings between Iranian patients with breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Breast cancer patients treated at the education hospital of Shohada-e Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from 2017 to 2021 were considered. Patients have included for whom a secondary chest CT scan was available at least six months after radiotherapy. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans were exported. Demographic features and data on underlying lung diseases, diabetes, and smoking history were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 46.1 ± 7.5 yrs and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Pulmonary fibrosis was detected for sixty-two cases. A significant relationship was obtained between the ipsilateral lung DVH parameters of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (P value < 0.05). The V5Gy, V10Gy, V13Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, MLD, and DMax for individuals with pulmonary fibrosis were significantly higher than those without this injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary fibrosis was distinguished for 25% of the breast cancer cases at least six months after adjuvant radiotherapy. A significant relationship between the DVH parameters, underlying lung disease, diabetes, radiotherapy fields (i.e., Breast + LN + SC or Breast/Chest-wall only), age, and BMI with the frequency of the ipsilateral pulmonary fibrosis was obtained. V13Gy and V30Gy of the ipsilateral lung may be the most predictor of pulmonary fibrosis incidence.

Proton Beam Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Adjuvant proton beam therapy (PBT) is increasingly available to patients with breast cancer. It achieves better planned dose distributions than standard photon radiation therapy and therefore may reduce the risks. However, clinical evidence is lacking.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of clinical outcomes from studies of adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer published in 2000 to 2022 was undertaken. Early breast cancer was defined as when all detected invasive cancer cells are in the breast or nearby lymph nodes and can be removed surgically. Adverse outcomes were summarized quantitatively, and the prevalence of the most common ones were estimated using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (1452 patients) reported clinical outcomes after adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer. Median follow-up ranged from 2 to 59 months. There were no published randomized trials comparing PBT with photon radiation therapy. Scattering PBT was delivered in 7 studies (258 patients) starting 2003 to 2015 and scanning PBT in 22 studies (1041 patients) starting 2000 to 2019. Two studies (123 patients) starting 2011 used both PBT types. For 1 study (30 patients), PBT type was unspecified. Adverse events were less severe after scanning than after scattering PBT. They also varied by clinical target. For partial breast PBT, 498 adverse events were reported (8 studies, 358 patients). None were categorized as severe after scanning PBT. For whole breast or chest wall ± regional lymph nodes PBT, 1344 adverse events were reported (19 studies, 933 patients). After scanning PBT, 4% (44/1026) of events were severe. The most prevalent severe outcome after scanning PBT was dermatitis, which occurred in 5.7% (95% confidence interval, 4.2-7.6) of patients. Other severe adverse outcomes included infection, pain, and pneumonitis (each ≤1%). Of the 141 reconstruction events reported (13 studies, 459 patients), the most prevalent after scanning PBT was prosthetic implant removal (34/181, 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is a quantitative summary of all published clinical outcomes after adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer. Ongoing randomized trials will provide information on its longer-term safety compared with standard photon radiation therapy.

Surface-guided radiotherapy overview: Technical aspects and clinical applications

In radiotherapy, patient positioning has long been ensured by ionizing imaging (kV or MV). Over the past ten years, surface-guided radiotherapy has appeared in radiotherapy departments. It is a continuous three-dimensional acquisition of the surface of the patient, based on the use of several optical cameras. The acquired surface is compared to an expected surface (usually taken from the planning scanner). Operators can constantly appreciate poor position, anatomical deformity or patient shift. Thus, the system allows an aid to the positioning of the patient, possibly without tattooing, but also a follow-up of the patient during the duration of the session. The most obvious contribution of the system concerns the treatment of the breast. In fact, for this location, the bone registration is not ideal and the target is visible in surface-guided radiotherapy. These systems also make it possible to treat in deep inspiration breath hold. But several other locations can benefit from it (pelvis, thorax, etc.).

Comparison of prone and supine positioning for breast cancer radiotherapy using REQUITE data: dosimetry, acute and two years physician and patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Most patients receive whole breast radiotherapy in a supine position. However, two randomised trials showed lower acute toxicity in prone position. Furthermore, in most patients, prone positioning reduced doses to the organs at risk. To confirm these findings, we compared toxicity outcomes, photographic assessment, and dosimetry between both positions using REQUITE data.

METHODS

REQUITE is an international multi-centre prospective observational study that recruited 2069 breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Data on toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and dosimetry were collected, as well as a photographic assessment. A matched case control analysis compared patients treated prone (n = 268) versus supine (n = 493). Exact matching was performed for the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, boost, lymph node irradiation, chemotherapy and fractionation, and the nearest neighbour for breast volume. Primary endpoints were dermatitis at the end of radiotherapy, and atrophy and cosmetic outcome by photographic assessment at two years.

RESULTS

At the last treatment fraction, there was no significant difference in dermatitis (p = .28) or any HRQoL domain, but prone positioning increased the risk of breast oedema (p < .001). At 2 years, patients treated in prone position had less atrophy (p = .01), and higher body image (p < .001), and social functioning (p < .001) scores. The photographic assessment showed no difference in cosmesis at 2 years (p = .22). In prone position, mean heart dose (MHD) was significantly lower for left-sided patients (1.29 Gy vs 2.10 Gy, p < .001) and ipsilateral mean lung dose (MLD) was significantly lower for all patients (2.77 Gy vs 5.89 Gy, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prone radiotherapy showed lower MLD and MHD compared to supine position, although the risk of developing breast oedema during radiotherapy was higher. At 2 years the photographic assessment showed no difference in the cosmetic outcome, but less atrophy was seen in prone-treated patients and this seems to have a positive influence on the HRQoL domain of body image.

ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Recommendations on implementation of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy

The use of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy, such as deep-inspiration breath hold, is increasing although guidelines for clinical implementation are lacking. In these recommendations, we aim to provide an overview of available technical solutions and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase. We will discuss specific challenges in different tumour sites including factors such as staff training and patient coaching, accuracy, and reproducibility. In addition, we aim to highlight the need for further research in specific patient groups. This report also reviews considerations for equipment, staff training and patient coaching, as well as image guidance for breath-hold treatments. Dedicated sections for specific indications, namely breast cancer, thoracic and abdominal tumours are also included.

External-Beam-Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Reduces Organ-at-Risk Doses Compared to Whole-Breast Irradiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery

In order to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in external-beam-accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) compared to standard whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early breast cancer received APBI within a prospective institutional single-arm trial. The prescribed dose to the planning treatment volume was 38 Gy in 10 fractions on 10 consecutive working days. OAR doses for the contralateral breast, the ipsilateral, contralateral, and whole lung, the whole heart, left ventricle (LV), and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and for the spinal cord and the skin were assessed and compared to a control group with real-world data from 116 patients who underwent WBI. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00004417. Compared to WBI, APBI led to reduced OAR doses for the contralateral breast (0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9 Gy, p = 0.000), the ipsilateral (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 Gy, p = 0.000) and whole mean lung dose (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.000), the mean heart dose (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4 Gy, p = 0.007), the LV V23 (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001), the mean LAD dose (2.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.8 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001), the maximum spinal cord dose (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 5.7 Gy, p = 0.016), and the maximum skin dose (39.6 ± 1.8 vs. 49.1 ± 5.8 Gy, p = 0.000). APBI should be recommended to suitable patients to minimize the risk of secondary tumor induction and the incidence of consecutive major cardiac events.

Assessment of Individual Radiosensitivity in Breast Cancer Patients Using a Combination of Biomolecular Markers

About 5% of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) develop RT-related side effects. To assess individual radiosensitivity, we collected peripheral blood from breast cancer patients before, during and after the RT, and γH2AX/53BP1 foci, apoptosis, chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and micronuclei (MN) were analyzed and correlated with the healthy tissue side effects assessed by the RTOG/EORTC criteria. The results showed a significantly higher level of γH2AX/53BP1 foci before the RT in radiosensitive (RS) patients in comparison to normal responding patients (NOR). Analysis of apoptosis did not reveal any correlation with side effects. CA and MN assays displayed an increase in genomic instability during and after RT and a higher frequency of MN in the lymphocytes of RS patients. We also studied time kinetics of γH2AX/53BP1 foci and apoptosis after in vitro irradiation of lymphocytes. Higher levels of primary 53BP1 and co-localizing γH2AX/53BP1 foci were detected in cells from RS patients as compared to NOR patients, while no difference in the residual foci or apoptotic response was found. The data suggested impaired DNA damage response in cells from RS patients. We suggest γH2AX/53BP1 foci and MN as potential biomarkers of individual radiosensitivity, but they need to be evaluated with a larger cohort of patients for clinics.

Systematic risk analysis of radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer: role of cotreatment with chemo-, endocrine, and targeted therapy

PURPOSE

A major complication of sequential and concomitant chemoradiation in breast cancer treatment is interstitial pneumonitis induced by radiation therapy (RT), systemic therapy, or a combination of both. Dose and volume of co-irradiated lung tissue directly correlate with the risk of radiation pneumonitis. Especially in case of combined treatment, it is often unclear which of the used therapeutic agents promote pneumonitis.

METHODS

This was a prospective monocentric study including 396 breast cancer patients. A systematic analysis of single and combined therapeutic measures was performed in order to identify treatment-related factors enhancing the risk of pneumonitis post RT.

RESULTS

Overall incidence of pneumonitis of any grade was 38%; 28% were asymptomatic (grade 1) and 10% were symptomatic (> grade 1). Pneumonitis > grade 2 did not occur. Beside age, smoking status, and mean lung dose, the combined treatment with goserelin and tamoxifen significantly enhanced the risk of pneumonitis in a supra-additive pattern (odds ratio [OR] 4.38), whereas each agent alone or combined with other drugs only nonsignificantly contributed to a higher pneumonitis incidence post RT (OR 1.52 and OR 1.16, respectively). None of the other systemic treatments, including taxanes, increased radiation pneumonitis risk in sequential chemoradiation.

CONCLUSION

Common treatment schedules in sequential chemoradiation following breast-conserving surgery only moderately increase lung toxicity, mainly as an asymptomatic complication, or to a minor extent, as transient pneumonitis ≤ grade 2. However, combined treatment with tamoxifen and the LHRH analog goserelin significantly increased the risk of pneumonitis in breast cancer patients after chemoradiation. Thus, closer surveillance of involved patients is advisable.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy locally advanced breast cancer: an interim report on acute toxicities and dosimetry

Background

There is a growing interest in the use of hypofractionation in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Here, we present an interim report on the acute toxicities and the dosimetry of a 15-day hypofractionated regimen.

Materials and methods

Patients aged 18-75 years who underwent mastectomy and had pathological stage IIB-IIIC or any clinical stage who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with PMRT at a dose of 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Acute toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Results

Between September 2020 and September 2021, 92 patients were enrolled in the study. Majority experienced grade 1 dermatitis during the course of treatment. Skin toxicities peaked two weeks after PMRT in which 57 patients (62%) had grade 2 dermatitis and 6 patients (7%) had grade 3 dermatitis. Most resolved one month after treatment, with all resolving at three months. Grade 2 fatigue occurred in 4 patients (4%). There were no grade 3 fatigue or pneumonitis of any grade. The average V95% for the chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular fossa were 91.5%, 99.3%, and 97.5%, respectively. Average ipsilateral lung V17 was 43.6%, while the mean heart dose averaged at 3.46 Gy.

Conclusion

This interim report showed that hypofractionated PMRT is associated with a low incidence of clinically significant acute toxicities. With the use of the 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and volume-based planning, adequate target volume coverage and acceptable heart doses were achieved, although with a slightly higher ipsilateral lung dose.

Lung Pneumonitis and Fibrosis in Cancer Therapy: A Review on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms

Fibrosis and pneumonitis are the most important side effects of lung tissue following cancer therapy. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy by some drugs, such as bleomycin, can induce pneumonitis and fibrosis. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy also may induce pneumonitis and fibrosis to a lesser extent compared to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Activation of lymphocytes by immunotherapy or infiltration of inflammatory cells such as macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and mast cells following chemo/radiation therapy can induce pneumonitis. Furthermore, the polarization of macrophages toward M2 cells and the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines stimulate fibrosis. Lung fibrosis and pneumonitis may also be potentiated by some other changes such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), oxidative stress, reduction/oxidation (redox) responses, renin-angiotensin system, and the upregulation of some inflammatory mediators such as a nuclear factor of kappa B (NF-κB), inflammasome, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Damages to the lung vascular system and the induction of hypoxia also can induce pulmonary injury following chemo/radiation therapy. This review explains various mechanisms of the induction of pneumonitis and lung fibrosis following cancer therapy. Furthermore, the targets and promising agents to mitigate lung fibrosis and pneumonitis will be discussed.

Dosimetric benefits of 3D-printed modulated electron bolus following lumpectomy and whole-breast radiotherapy for left breast cancer

Radiotherapy with electrons is commonly applied to the tumor bed after whole-breast radiotherapy following breast conservation surgery for breast cancer patients. However, the radiation dose to adjacent organs-at-risk (OARs) and conformity of planning target volume (PTV) cannot be optimized. In this study, we examine the feasibility of using modulated electron bolus (MEB) to improve PTV conformity and reduce the dose to these OARs. Twenty-seven patients with left breast cancer were retrospectively selected in this study. For each patient, a tangential photon plan in RayStation treatment planning system with prescription of 26 Gy in 5 fractions was created as base plan. Two electron plans, one without bolus and one with MEB using Adaptiiv software based on the PTV were created. Various dosimetric parameters of OARs including left lung, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD) and ribs and the conformity indices of PTV of these 2 electron plans together with the base plans were compared. Statistically significant decreases in the dosimetric parameters (V_5Gy, V_10Gy, V_20Gy, and mean dose) of the ipsilateral left lung and the heart were observed with MEB. The median maximum dose to the LAD and the ribs decreased by 6.2% and 4.5% respectively. The median conformity index was improved by 14.3% with median increases of monitor units by 1.7%. Our results show that MEB is feasible resulting in reduction of doses to the predefined OARs and an improved conformity of PTV. By using 3D printing, MEB might be considered as an alternative to conventional electron boost.

Four irradiation and three positioning techniques for whole-breast radiotherapy: Is sophisticated always better?

PURPOSE

We report on a dosimetrical study of three patient positions (supine, prone dive, and prone crawl) and four irradiation techniques for whole-breast irradiation (WBI): wedged-tangential fields (W-TF), tangential-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (TF-IMRT), multi-beam IMRT (MB-IMRT), and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT). This is the first study to evaluate prone crawl positioning in WBI and the first study to quantify dosimetrical and anatomical differences with prone dive positioning.

METHODS

We analyzed five datasets with left- and right-sided patients (n = 51). One dataset also included deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) data. A total of 252 new treatment plans were composed. Dose-volume parameters and indices of conformity were calculated for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs). Furthermore, anatomical differences among patient positions were quantified to explain dosimetrical differences.

RESULTS

Target coverage was inferior for W-TF and supine position. W-TF proved overall inferior, and IMAT proved foremost effective in supine position. TF-IMRT proved competitive to the more demanding MB-IMRT and IMAT in prone dive, but not in prone crawl position. The lung-sparing effect was overall confirmed for both prone dive and prone crawl positioning and was largest for prone crawl. For the heart, no differences were found between prone dive and supine positioning, whereas prone crawl showed cardiac advantages, although minor compared to the established heart-sparing effect of DIBH. Dose differences for contralateral breast were minor among the patient positions. In prone crawl position, the ipsilateral breast sags deeper and the PTV is further away from the OARs than in prone dive position.

CONCLUSIONS

The prone dive and prone crawl position are valid alternatives to the supine position in WBI, with largest advantages for lung structures. For the heart, differences are small, which establishes the role of DIBH in different patient positions. These results may be of particular interest to radiotherapy centers with limited technical resources.

Comparison of fulfilling the criteria for critical organs in irradiation of patients with breast cancer using the deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing techniques

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate organ-at-risk dose sparing in treatment plans for patients with left-sided breast cancer irradiated with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) and Free Breathing (FB) techniques.

Material and methods: Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were analyzed and divided into two groups. Group A included 10 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, while group B involved 10 patients with metastatic breast cancer spreading to regional lymph nodes. All patients went through the DIBH coaching. For planning purposes, CT scans were obtained in both DIBH and FB. Mean heart dose (Dmean,heart), mean heart volume receiving 50% of the prescribed dose (V50), V20 (V20L.lung), V10 (V10L.lung) and V5 for left lung (V5L.lung), the volume of the PTV receiving a dose greater than or equal to 95% of the prescribed dose (V95 [%]), the maximum point dose (Dmax), and the volume of PTV receiving 107% of the prescribed dose were reported.

Results: In all 20 analyzed pairs of plans, a reduction by more than half in the mean heart dose in DIBH technique plans was achieved, as well as a significant reduction was found in DIBH plans for the heart V50. In 19 patients, the use of the DIBH technique also reduced the volume of the left lung receiving doses of 20 Gy, 10 Gy, and 5 Gy compared to the FB technique.

Conclusions: Dosimetric analysis showed that the free breathing plans don’t fulfill the criteria for a mean heart dose (group B) and the left lung receiving a 20 Gy dose (group A) compared to the DIBH plans. Radiation therapy of left breast cancer with the use of the DIBH technique results in a significant dose reduction in the heart and also reduces the dose in the left lung in the majority of patients, compared to the FB procedure.

Prone Breast and Lymph Node Irradiation in 5 or 15 Fractions: A Randomized 2 × 2 Design Comparing Dosimetry, Acute Toxicity, and Set-Up Errors

PURPOSE

Prone whole breast irradiation results in lower dose to organs at risk compared with supine position, especially lung dose. However, the adoption of prone position for whole breast irradiation + lymph node irradiation remains limited and data on lymph node irradiation in 5 fractions are lacking. Although the study was ended prematurely for the primary endpoint (breast retraction at 2 years), we decided to report acute toxicity for prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. Additionally, dosimetry and set-up accuracy between prone and supine positions were evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A randomized open-label factorial 2 × 2 design was used for an acute toxicity comparison between prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. The primary endpoint of the trial was breast retraction 2 years after treatment. In total, 57 patients were evaluated. Dosimetry and set-up errors were compared between prone and supine positions. All patients were positioned on either our in -house developed prone crawl breast couch or a Posirest-2 (Civco).

RESULTS

No difference in acute toxicity between prone and supine positions was found, but 5 fractions did result in a lower risk of desquamation (15% vs 41%; P = .04). Prone positioning resulted in lower mean ipsilateral lung dose (2.89 vs 4.89 Gy; P < .001), mean thyroid dose (3.42 vs 6.61 Gy; P = .004), and mean contralateral breast dose (0.41 vs 0.54 Gy; P = .007). No significant difference in mean heart dose (0.90 vs 1.07 Gy; P = .22) was found. Set-up accuracy was similar between both positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Unfortunately, the primary endpoint of the trial was not met due to premature closure of the trial. Acceleration in 5 fractions resulted in a lower risk of desquamation. Prone positioning did not influence acute toxicity or set-up accuracy, but did result in lower ipsilateral mean lung dose, thyroid dose, and contralateral breast dose.

Anatomy-dependent lung doses from 3D-conformal breast-cancer radiotherapy

This study aims to identify key anatomic features that govern the individual variability of lung doses from breast-cancer radiotherapy. 3D conformal, intensity-modulated and hybrid techniques with 50.4 Gy whole-breast dose were planned for 128 patients. From their CT images, 17 anatomic measures were assessed and tested as predictors for lung dose-volume characteristics. Tangential techniques yielded mean ipsilateral lung doses in the range of 3–11 Gy. This inter-patient variability was explained to almost 40% by central lung distance, and to almost 60% if this measure was complemented by midplane lung width and maximum heart distance. Also the variability in further dose-volume metrics such as volume fractions receiving 5, 20 or 40 Gy could be largely explained by the anatomy. Multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduced high-exposed lung volumes, but resulted in higher mean ipsilateral lung doses and larger low-dose burden. Contralateral lung doses ranged from 0.3 to 1 Gy. The results highlight that there are large differences in lung doses among breast-cancer patients. Most of this inter-individual variability can be explained by a few anatomic features. The results will be implemented in a dedicated software tool to provide personalized estimates of long-term health risks related to breast-cancer radiotherapy. The results may also be used to identify favourable as well as problematic anatomies, and serve as a quick quantitative benchmark for individual treatment plans.

Dosimetric Planning Comparison for Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: The Clinical Feasibility of Four-Dimensional-Computed Tomography-Based Treatment Planning Optimization

Background: Adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy (RT) is a significant part of the standard of care treatment after breast cancer (BC) conserving surgery. Modern techniques including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have constituted to better target coverage and critical organs sparing. However, BC survivors are at risk of developing radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. Hence, deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques have been implemented at many centers to further reduce cardiac exposure but require compliance. 4D-CT robust optimization can account for heart intrafractional motion per breathing phase. The optimization has been explored in cardiac sparing of breast IMRT compared to DIBH in a small sample size but has not been evaluated in substructures sparing, nor in VMAT. To provide patients who are not compliant to breath-hold with an optimal treatment approach, various heart sparing techniques need to be evaluated for statistical significance and clinical feasibility.

Aim: This retrospective study aimed to provide an extensive dosimetric heart sparing comparison of free-breathing, 4D-CT-based treatment planning, including robust optimization with DIBH-based treatment planning. Combinations of forward and inverse IMRT and VMAT are also considered.

Methods: Fifteen early stage left-sided BC standard treatment plans were selected. Breast, lung, left anterior descending artery (LAD), left ventricle (LV), and the whole heart were contoured on each 4D-CT phase and DIBH CT dataset. Each treatment plan was optimized using forward/inverse IMRT and VMAT on the following CT datasets: DIBH, average 4D-CT, and the complete 4D-CT dataset needed for robust optimization. Dose-volume histograms were used to compare V_5GyHeart, mean heart dose, mean and max LAD dose, mean LV dose, and V_50%Lung.

Results: All RT techniques assessed including 4D robust optimization were clinically feasible. Statistically significant differences in mean heart, LAD and LV dose, max LAD dose, and V_5GyHeart (p < 0.01) but no difference in V_50%Lung (p = 0.29) were found between different techniques. IMRT DIBH achieved the optimal cardiac and substructure sparing among treatment plans. 4D robust IMRT had significantly greater mean heart and LV dose than DIBH IMRT (p ≤ 0.01), except LAD dose. Among free-breathing methods, no difference in all cardiac and substructure dose parameters was observed (p > 0.2) in comparing forward and inverse IMRT with average 4D-CT, inverse average 4D-CT, and 4D robust with IMRT, and between average 4D-CT VMAT and 4D robust VMAT. Only V_5GyHeart and mean LV dose were significantly greater in 4D robust VMAT (p < 0.01) compared to DIBH VMAT. Mean heart and LV doses were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in DIBH IMRT compared to DIBH VMAT. Moreover, mean heart and LV dose, V_5GyHeart were significantly reduced in inverse IMRT average 4D-CT compared to average 4D-CT VMAT (p < 0.02) and in 4D robust IMRT compared to 4D robust VMAT (p < 0.04).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the clinical feasibility of 4D robust optimization in limiting the cardiac and substructures dose during free-breathing RT with both IMRT/VMAT for patients who are not compliant with breath-hold RT. However, this study also presents that 4D robust optimization can reduce LAD dose but not fully outperform DIBH or conventional 4D-CT-based planning with IMRT/VMAT in heart sparing in treating early staged left-sided BC patients.

Fluence map analyzer reduces low dose volume in locally advanced post mastectomy breast cancer patients

Multi-leaf collimator dose leakage in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans causes higher low dose volume which increases the long-term risks of radiotherapy. We have developed Fluence Map Analyzer (FMA) program that suggests the ideal field geometry to reduce low dose volume in locally advanced breast cancer IMRT plans. In this comparative experimental study, FMA has been applied to standard IMRT plans (STD-IMRT) of randomly selected 15 left and 15 right-sided locally advanced breast cancer patients. All patients underwent a modified radical mastectomy. The chest wall, IMN, axillary, and supraclavicular lymph nodes are included in planning target volume (PTV). The heart, lungs, contralateral breast, and medulla spinalis were delineated as organs at risk (OARs). Two sets of plans, namely STD-IMRT and FMA-IMRT, were generated for each patient. The dosimetric analysis was performed using dose-volume histogram (DVH) and standard evaluation parameters of PTV and OARs. No differences could be observed among the two techniques for PTV coverage. However, FMA-IMRT plans achieved significantly lower V5volumes and mean doses of the heart, lungs, contralateral breast, and body contours. FMA-IMRT used a smaller number of sub-fields and fewer monitor units (MU). FMA automizes the field geometry determination process for locally advanced breast cancer IMRT planning while reducing low dose volume significantly.

Preoperative spirometry and BMI in deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy: the early detection of cardiac and lung dose predictors without radiation exposure

Background

This study aimed to investigate preoperative spirometry and BMI as early predictors of the mean heart and lung dose (MHD, MLD) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy.

Methods

Left-sided breast cancer patients underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by DIBH radiotherapy enrolled. Patients who were not available for preoperative spirometry were excluded. One hundred eligible patients were performed free-breathing (FB-) CT and DIBH-CT for plan comparison. We completed the correlative and multivariate analysis to develop the linear regression models for dose prediction. The residuals were calculated to explore the unpreferable subgroups and compare the prediction accuracy.

Results

Among the parameters, vital capacity (VC) and BMI showed the strongest negative correlation with MHD (r = − 0.33) and MLD (r = − 0.34), respectively. They were also significant in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Elderly and less VC were independent predictors of increasing absolute residuals (AR). The VC model showed no significant difference in AR compared to the model using the CT parameter of lung volume in FB (LV-FB): median AR of the LV-FB model vs. the VC model was 0.12 vs. 0.11 Gy (P = 0.79). On the other hand, the median AR of the MLD model was 0.38 Gy, showing no specific subgroups of larger AR.

Conclusion

Preoperative spirometry and BMI are significant predictors of MHD and MLD, respectively. Although elderly and low-VC patients may have larger predictive variations, spirometry might be a substitute for LV-FB as a predictor of MHD.

Risk of primary lung cancer after breast cancer radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have shown that the risk of secondary malignancies may increase by radiotherapy. Lung cancer is the most important long-term complication of breast cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

Major electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE were searched. All cohort studies that investigated the association between radiotherapy for breast cancer and risk of primary lung, bronchus, and trachea cancers conducted until March 2021 were included. The study participants were evaluated regardless of their age and ethnicity. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. The designated effects were risk ratio (RR). The random-effects model was used to estimate the average effects.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies including 1,640,247 women with primary breast cancer were identified of which 937,151 had not received radiotherapy and 703,096 subjects had received radiotherapy. In general, there was no significant association between breast cancer radiotherapy and lung cancer based on 10 studies (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.02, P = 0.15), There was no association between breast cancer radiotherapy and lung, bronchus, and trachea cancers either based on 5 studies (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.02, P = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for breast cancer is not associated with an excess risk of lung cancer. Due to the limited number of studies, lack of data regarding smoking status, and substantial variation in exposure of the lungs in breast cancer radiotherapy worldwide, further investigations based on randomized controlled trials are suggested to address the potential risk of lung cancer after breast cancer radiotherapy.

Prone versus supine free-breathing for right-sided whole breast radiotherapy

Prone setup has been advocated to improve organ sparing in whole breast radiotherapy without impairing breast coverage. We evaluate the dosimetric advantage of prone setup for the right breast and look for predictors of the gain. Right breast cancer patients treated in 2010-2013 who had a dual supine and prone planning were retrospectively identified. A penalty score was computed from the mean absolute dose deviation to heart, lungs, breasts, and tumor bed for each patient's supine and prone plan. Dosimetric advantage of prone was assessed by the reduction of penalty score from supine to prone. The effect of patients' characteristics on the reduction of penalty was analyzed using robust linear regression. A total of 146 patients with right breast dual plans were identified. Prone compared to supine reduced the penalty score in 119 patients (81.5%). Lung doses were reduced by 70.8%, from 4.8 Gy supine to 1.4 Gy prone. Among patient's characteristics, the only significant predictors were the breast volumes, but no cutoff could identify when prone would be less advantageous than supine. Prone was associated with a dosimetric advantage in most patients. It sets a benchmark of achievable lung dose reduction.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02237469, HUGProne, September 11, 2014, retrospectively registered.

The untold story of late effects: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer survivors' emotional responses to late effects

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, called late effects, years after the completion of active treatment. Late effects can significantly impair physical functioning. The current study aimed to explore breast cancer survivors' experiences of late effects, their emotional responses to existing or potential late effects and their perceived impact.

METHODS

A total of 36 women treated for breast cancer in the last 10 years participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participant views were sought with respect to knowledge, experience, and perceived longer-term risk. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management. There was a range of emotional responses to late effects; however, many participants reported being unaware of their risk of late effects. Participants conceptualised late effects as any long-term effect of treatment regardless of the time of onset. Women reported living with constant uncertainty and feared cancer recurrence. Many were focused on managing long-term treatment side effects, rather than late effects.

CONCLUSION

Many women undergo treatment and remain unaware of associated late effect risks. National guidelines recommend patients be informed about late effects; however, the results of this study suggest a gap between policy and practice. Evidence-based interventions are needed to equip women with strategies to physically and emotionally manage late effects.

Exposure of the oesophagus in breast cancer radiotherapy: A systematic review of oesophagus doses published 2010-2020

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Breast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risk of subsequent primary oesophageal cancer, with risk increasing according to oesophagus radiation dose. We describe oesophagus exposure from modern breast cancer regimens and discuss the risks of oesophageal cancer for women irradiated recently.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of oesophagus doses from breast cancer radiotherapy regimens published during 2010-2020. Mean and maximum oesophagus doses were described for different target regions irradiated and different radiotherapy techniques.

RESULTS

In 112 published regimens from 18 countries, oesophagus doses varied with target region. For partial breast irradiation, average mean oesophagus dose was 0.2 Gy (range 0.1-0.4) in four regimens; maximum dose was not reported. For breast or chest wall radiotherapy, average oesophagus doses were mean 1.8 Gy (range 0.1-10.4) in 24 regimens and maximum 6.7 Gy (range 0.4-14.3) in seven regimens. For radiotherapy including a nodal region, average oesophagus doses were higher: mean 11.4 Gy (range <0.1-29.3) in 61 regimens and maximum 34.4 Gy (range 3.4-51.3) in 55 regimens. Average mean oesophagus doses were >10 Gy for intensity modulated nodal radiotherapy, but lower for other node techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean oesophagus doses from partial breast and breast/chest wall regimens were usually less than 2 Gy, hence radiation-risks will be very small. However, for radiotherapy including lymph nodes, average mean oesophagus dose of 11.4 Gy may nearly double oesophageal cancer risk. Consideration of oesophageal exposure during nodal radiotherapy planning may reduce the risks of radiation-related oesophageal cancer for women irradiated today.

Radiation therapy with elective lymph node irradiation for breast cancer: dosimetric study and impact on cardiovascular risk and second neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform dosimetric analysis of radiotherapy (RT) plans with or without elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and estimate whether the increase in mean doses (MDs) in the heart and lungs with ENI may lead to late side effects that may surpass the benefits of treatment.

METHODS

The dosimetric analysis of 30 treatment plans was done with or without ENI. The planning and dose-volume histograms were analyzed, and the impact on the mortality of cardiovascular and lung cancer was estimated based on the correlation of the dosimetric data with data from population studies.

RESULTS

RT with ENI increased the doses in the lungs and heterogeneity in the plans compared to breast-exclusive RT. When the increase in MDs is correlated with the increase of late side-effect risks, the most important effect of ENI is the increased risk of lung cancer, especially in patients who smoke (average increase in absolute risk=1.38%). The increase in the absolute risk of cardiovascular diseases was below 0.1% in the all the situations analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

ENI increases the heterogeneity and the doses at the lungs. When recommending ENI, the risks and benefits must be taken into account, considering the oncology factors and the plan of each patient. Special attention must be given to patients who smoke as ENI may lead to a significant increase in MD in the lung and the increased risk of radiation-induced lung cancer may surpass the benefits from this treatment.

No changes in myocardial perfusion following radiation therapy of left-sided breast cancer: A positron emission tomography study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer has improved overall survival. However, incidental exposure of the heart has been linked to development of radiation-induced heart disease. The aim of this study was, in a cohort of asymptomatic post-irradiation breast cancer patients, to investigate changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) and presence of perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion positron-emission-tomography (PET) in the irradiated myocardium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty patients treated with RT for left-sided breast cancer underwent 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET 7(± 2) years after breath adapted RT to a total dose of 48 Gy given in 24 fractions. No differences in rest or stress MBF were noted between the irradiated and non-irradiated myocardium (1.29 (± 0.29) vs 1.33 (± 0.29) mL/g/min, ns; 2.74 (± 0.59) vs 2.78 (± 0.66) mL/g/min, ns, respectively). One patient demonstrated a myocardial perfusion defect localized in the irradiated anterior wall myocardium.

CONCLUSION

Although limited by a small sample size, early signs of cardiac injury detected by NH3 myocardial perfusion PET was at least not frequent in our cohort of patients treated with a modern RT technique for left-sided breast cancer, even 7 years after treatment. The findings however, may not rule out subsequent development of myocardial injury.

Dosimetry and outcomes in patients receiving radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) is rare and there is little evidence describing organs at risk (OAR) and limits to the heart and lungs caused by radiotherapy (RT). Quantifying mean heart dose (MHD) and mean lung dose (MLD) from RT in this patient cohort may lead to better understanding of doses to OAR and resultant effects on clinical outcomes. The primary objective was to assess median MHD and MLD in SBBC, while secondary aims included analyses of 1) factors associated with MHD and MLD, 2) V5 and V20 values and 3) factors associated with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients planned for adjuvant bilateral whole breast/chest wall (WB) RT from a single institution treated in 2011-2018 were included. Median MHD and MLD (Gy) were stratified by hypofractionated (42.56 Gy/16 fractions, HFRT) and conventional fractionation (50 Gy/ 25 fractions, CFRT) and summarized separately based on the following treatments: 1) locoregional RT, WB tangential RT either 2) no boost 3) sequential boost or 4) simultaneous integrated boost. MHD, MLD, lung V5 and V20 values, and demographics were collected. Linear regression analyses identified factors associated with MHD and MLD and factors associated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were included. The median MHD for HFRT and CFRT was 1.99 Gy and 2.94 Gy, respectively. The median MLD for HFRT and CFRT was 6.00 Gy and 10.08 Gy, respectively. MHD and MLD were significantly associated with the occurrence of a cardiac or pulmonary event post-radiation. Patients who had a mastectomy or tumoral muscle involvement were more likely to develop a local recurrence, metastasis or new primary while patients who had a lumpectomy or tumor with a positive estrogen receptor status were less likely to experience these events.

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation should be conducted to identify SBBC RT techniques that mitigate dose to OARs to improve clinical outcomes in bilateral breast patients.

Dosimetric comparison of VitalBeam® and HalcyonTM 2.0 for hypofractionated VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost treatment of early-stage left-sided breast cancer

Purpose

This study compared the quality of treatment plans for early‐stage, left‐sided breast cancer, as planned for and delivered by the Halcyon^TM and VitalBeam^®.

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients diagnosed with early‐stage left‐sided breast cancer, who had received VMAT with hypofractionated SIB, were recruited. All cases were planned using Halcyon^TM comprising a dual‐layer MLC (DL‐MLC) and VitalBeam^® with a Millennium 120 MLC (VB‐MLC). For the PTVs, the quality of coverage (QC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) were calculated for each plan. The dosimetric differences between the two treatment plans were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test (p < 0.05). To evaluate delivery efficiency, the average delivery time for each patient's treatment plan was recorded and compared.

Results

For the PTVs, the two plans (DL‐MLC and VB‐MLC) were comparable in terms of the QC, CI, and HI. However, V_30Gy and D_mean for the heart in the DL‐MLC plan were significantly reduced by 0.49% and 14.6%, respectively, compared with those in the VB‐MLC plan (p < 0.05). The D_mean value for the ipsilateral lung in the DL‐MLC plan significantly decreased by 5.5%, compared with that in the VB‐MLC plan (p < 0.05). In addition, the delivery times for the DL‐MLC and VB‐MLC plans were 79 ± 10 and 101 ± 11 s, respectively.

Conclusions

DL‐MLC plans were found to improve OAR sparing. In particular, when treating left‐sided breast cancer via DL‐MLC plans, the risk of heart toxicity is expected to be reduced.

Estimation of Annual Secondary Lung Cancer Deaths Using Various Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy Techniques for Early-Stage Cancers

Purpose

Secondary lung cancer (SLC) can offset the benefit of adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT), and risks compound sharply after 25 to 30 years. We hypothesized that SLC risk is mainly an issue for early-stage breast cancer, and that lives could be saved using different RT techniques.

Patients and Methods

The SEER database was used to extract breast patient age, stage survival, and radiotherapy utilization over time and per stage and to assess the factors associated with increased SLC risk with a multivariable competing risk Cox model. The number of SLC was calculated using the BEIR model modified with patient survival, age, and use of RT from the SEER database. Stage distribution and number of new breast cancer cases were obtained from the NAACCR. Mean lung dose for various irradiation techniques was obtained from measurement or literature.

Results

Out of the 765,697 non-metastatic breast cancers in the SEER database from 1988 to 2012, 49.8% received RT. RT significantly increased the SLC risk for longer follow-up (HR=1.58), early stage including DCIS, stage I and IIA (HR = 1.11), and younger age (HR=1.061) (all p<0.001). More advanced stages did not have significantly increased risk. In 2019, 104,743 early-stage breast patients received radiotherapy, and an estimated 3,413 will develop SLC (3.25%) leading to an excess of 2,900 deaths (2.77%). VMAT would reduce this mortality by 9.9%, hypofractionation 26 Gy in five fractions by 38.8%, a prone technique by 70.3%, 3D-CRT APBI by 43.3%, HDR brachytherapy by 71.1%, LDR by 80.7%, and robotic 4π APBI by 85.2%.

Conclusions

SLC after breast RT remains a clinically significant issue for early-stage breast cancers. This mortality could be significantly reduced using a prone technique or APBI.

Side Effects 15 Years after Lymph Node Irradiation in Breast Cancer: Randomized EORTC Trial 22922/10925

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty about the benefit/risk ratio of regional lymph node irradiation led to varying clinical protocols. We investigated long-term late side effects after internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) lymph node irradiation to improve shared decision-making.

METHODS

The multicentre EORTC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00002851) randomized stage I-III breast cancer patients with involved axillary nodes and/or a medially located primary tumor. We analyzed late side effects, both longitudinally at every follow-up and cross-sectionally at 5-year intervals. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2004, 46 departments from 13 countries accrued 4004 patients. Median follow-up was 15.7 years. Longitudinal follow-up data showed cumulative incidence rates at 15 years of 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2%-3.8%) vs. 5.7% (95% CI = 4.7%-6.9%) (P<.001) for lung fibrosis, of 1.1% (95% CI = 0.7%-1.7%) vs. 1.9% (95% CI = 1.3%-2.6%) (P=.07) for cardiac fibrosis, and of 9.4% (95% CI = 8.0%-10.8%) vs. 11.1% (95% CI = 9.6%-12.7%) (P=.04) for any cardiac disease, when treated without or with IM-MS lymph node irradiation. There was no evidence for differences between left- and right-sided breast cancer (Wald chi-square test of treatment by breast side interaction, P=.33 and P=.35, for cardiac fibrosis and for any cardiac disease, respectively). The cumulative incidence probabilities of cross-sectionally reported side effects with a score of 2 or greater at 15 years were 0.1% (95% CI = 0.0%-0.5%) vs. 0.8% (95% CI = 0.4%-1.4%) for pulmonary (P=.02), 1.8% (95% CI = 1.1%-2.8%) vs. 2.6% (95% CI = 1.8%-3.7%) for cardiac (P=.15), and 0.0% (95% CI not evaluated) vs. 0.1% (95% CI = 0.0%-0.4%) for oesophageal (P=.16), respectively. No difference was observed in the incidence of second malignancies, contralateral breast cancer or cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of late pulmonary side effects was statistically significantly higher after IM-MS lymph node irradiation, as were some of the cardiac events, without a difference between left- and right-sided treatments. Absolute rates and differences were very low, without increased non-breast cancer related mortality, even before introducing heart-sparing techniques.

Auxiliary Structures-Assisted Radiotherapy Improvement for Advanced Left Breast Cancer

Background

To improve the quality of plan for the radiation treatment of advanced left breast cancer by introducing the auxiliary structures (ASs) which are used to spare the regions with no intact delineated structures adjacent to the target volume.

Methods

CT data from 20 patients with left-sided advanced breast cancer were selected. An AS designated as A1 was created to spare the regions of the aorta, pulmonary artery, superior vena ava, and contralateral tissue of the upper chest and neck, and another, designated as A2, was created in the regions of the cardia and fundus of the stomach, left liver lobe, and splenic flexure of the colon. IMRT and VMAT plans were created for cases with and without the use of the AS dose constraints in plan optimization. Dosimetric parameters of the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between the separated groups.

Results

With the use of AS dose constraints, both the IMRT and VMAT plans were clinically acceptable and deliverable, even showing a slight improvement in dose distribution of both the target and OARs compared with the AS-unused plans. The ASs significantly realized the dose sparing for the regions and brought a better conformity index (p < 0.05) and homogeneity index (p < 0.05) in VMAT plans. In addition, the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V₂₀) for the heart (p < 0.05), V₄₀ for the left lung (p < 0.05), and V₄₀ for the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel juncture region (p < 0.05) were all lower in VMAT plans.

Conclusion

The use of the defined AS dose constraints in plan optimization was effective in sparing the indicated regions, improving the target dose distribution, and sparing OARs for advanced left breast cancer radiotherapy, especially those that utilize VMAT plans.

Immobilization-assisted abdominal deep inspiration breath-hold in post-mastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with internal mammary chain coverage

Background

Whether to prophylactically irradiate the ipsilateral internal mammary chain (IMC) in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) remains controversial because of equivocal clinical benefits against the added toxicities. Our previous study revealed that the cardiac dose was decreased during left-sided breast radiotherapy with abdominal deep inspiration breath-hold (aDIBH) as compared with free-breathing (FB) and thoracic deep inspiration breath-hold (tDIBH). Here we present the dosimetric advantage of aDIBH for patients undergoing PMRT with IMC coverage.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed 19 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent PMRT. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation under both free-breathing (FB) and aDIBH. The heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), lungs, and the contralateral breast was defined as organs at risk (OARs). Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), inverse planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were used to calculate the doses received by both the planning target volume (PTV) and OARs, which were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Compared with FB, the D_mean of the heart and LAD were respectively reduced by 3.5 Gy (P<0.003) and 8.9 Gy (P<0.001) in 3D-CRT, 2.6 Gy (P<0.001), and 7.8 Gy (P=0.001) in IMRT, 1.5 Gy (P<0.001) and 4.5 Gy (P=0.001) in VMAT plans under aDIBH. Among all these plans, the D_mean of the heart was lowest in aDIBH _IMRT and 1.3 Gy lower than in aDIBH _VMAT (P=0.002). aDIBH _IMRT also resulted in a significantly reduced dose to the ipsilateral lung than plans under FB (P<0.05). D_mean and V5 to the contralateral lung and breast were higher in VMAT plans (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Using an immobilization-assisted aDIBH technique, radiation doses to the heart can be kept at reasonably low levels even if IMC is included in the clinical target volume (CTV). Among 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT plans, IMRT plus aDIBH results in the best heart-sparing effect. We recommend that the aDIBH technique be routinely applied in suitable patients if the IMC is irradiated.

Correlation between gastric volume and organs at risk dose in adjuvant radiotherapy for left breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of the gastric volume on the dose-effect relationship for these organs has not been investigated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between gastric volume and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the heart, left lung and stomach during left breast cancer radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-nine left breast cancer patients who got adjuvant radiotherapy were included. Study was classified into two groups based on treatment field arrangements: 1) breast tangential fields only (T) and 2) breast tangential and supraclavicular fields (TS). Organs DVHs were extracted. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, linear regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

There is a direct but not significant correlation between the gastric volume and doses to the stomach and left lung. For a 100-cc increase in the gastric volume, the stomach maximum dose and the V₅₀ increased by 3 Gy and 4%, respectively. For the left lung, V₄ and V₅ increased by 1% for TS cases. Considering ROC analysis results, one can make a decision for about 74% of patients due to their left lung DVH parameters, using gastric volume as a known input data. The correlation between gastric volume and heart dose was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The gastric volume of about 170 cc or less can result in lower dose to the stomach and ipsilateral lung during left breast cancer radiotherapy, especially for TS cases. To reach this gastric volume threshold, patients should be fast for 2 hours before the procedure of CT simulation and treatment.

Association of Breast Cancer Irradiation With Cardiac Toxic Effects: A Narrative Review

IMPORTANCE

To promptly recognize and manage cardiovascular (CV) risk factors before, during, and after cancer treatment, decreasing the risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction is crucial. After recent advances in breast cancer treatment, mortality rates from cancer have decreased, and the prevalence of survivors with a potentially higher CV disease risk has increased. Cardiovascular risks might be associated with the multimodal approach, including systemic therapies and breast radiotherapy (RT).

OBSERVATIONS

The heart disease risk seems to be higher in patients with tumors in the left breast, when other classic CV risk factors are present, and when adjunctive anthracycline-based chemotherapy is administered, suggesting a synergistic association. Respiratory control as well as modern RT techniques and their possible further refinement may decrease the prevalence and severity of radiation-induced heart disease. Several pharmacological cardioprevention strategies for decreasing cardiac toxic effects have been identified in several guidelines. However, further research is needed to ascertain the feasibility of these strategies in routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review found that evidence-based recommendations are lacking on the modalities for and intensity of heart disease screening, surveillance of patients after RT, and treatment of these patients. A multidisciplinary and multimodal approach is crucial to guide optimal management.

Risk of primary lung cancer after adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer-a large population-based study

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) has been associated with an increased risk of later radiation-induced lung cancer (LC). We examined the risk of primary LC in a population-based cohort of 52300 women treated for BC during 1992 to 2012, and 253796 age-matched women without BC. Cumulative incidence of LC was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk of LC after BC treatment was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Women with BC receiving RT had a higher cumulative incidence of LC compared to women with BC not receiving RT and women without BC. This became apparent 5 years after RT and increased with longer follow-up. Women with BC receiving RT had a Hazard ratio of 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.37-1.84) for LC compared to women without BC. RT techniques that lower the incidental lung doses, e.g breathing adaption techniques, may lower this risk.

The effect of imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography) and patient position (supine vs. prone) on target and organ at risk doses in partial breast irradiation

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally computed tomography (CT) has been used to delineate target volumes in radiotherapy; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being continually integrated into clinical practice; therefore, the investigation into targets derived from MRI is warranted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of imaging modality (MRI vs. CT) and patient positioning (supine vs. prone) on planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) for partial breast irradiation (PBI).

METHODS

A retrospective data set, of 35 patients, was accessed where each patient had undergone MRI and CT imaging for tangential whole breast radiotherapy in both the supine and prone position. PTVs were defined from seroma cavity (SC) volumes delineated on each respective image, resulting in 4 PTVs per patient. PBI plans were generated with 6MV external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using the TROG 06.02 protocol guidelines. A prescription of 38.5Gy in 10 fractions was used for all cases. The impact analysis of imaging modality and patient positioning included dose to PTVs, and OARs based on agreed criteria. Statistical analysis was conducted though Mann-Whitey U, Fisher's exact and chi-squared testing (P < 0.005).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were eligible for imaging analysis. However, positioning analysis could only be investigated on 19 of these data sets. No statistically significant difference was found in OAR doses based on imaging modality. Supine patient position resulted in lower contralateral breast dose (0.10Gy ± 0.35 vs. 0.33Gy ± 0.78, p = 0.011). Prone positioning resulted in a lower dose to ipsilateral lung volumes (10.85Gy ± 11.37 vs. 3.41Gy ± 3.93, P = <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PBI plans with PTVs derived from MRI exhibited no clinically significant differences when compared to plans created from CT in relation to plan compliance and OAR dose. Patient position requires careful consideration regardless of imaging modality chosen. Although there was no proven superiority of MRI derived target volumes, it indicates that MRI could be considered for PBI target delineation.

Dosimetric comparison between different tangential field arrangements during left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

This study aimed to evaluate variations in dose distribution within the target volume and dose received by the organs at risk (OARs) for different tangential field arrangements during three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer. Computed tomography (CT) images of 25 breast cancer patients were included, and three different mono-isocentric half-block (MIHB) treatment plans-parallel central axis technique (PCAXT), posterior border parallel technique (PBPT), and parallel quadrant technique (PQUDT)-were considered for each patient. The dosimetric and geometric parameters related to each followed plan were then extracted for the planning target volume (PTV) and the OARs, and compared. The results showed no significant differences among the extracted dosimetric and geometric parameters of the OARs for the different plans, while the D_max, V_95%, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) values related to the PTV were significantly different (P < 0.05). The lowest D_max and V_95% values inside the PTV were related to the PCAXT plan. The best HI was achieved with the PBPT plan, whereas the best CI was observed for the PCAXT plan. The best correlation between the geometric and dosimetric parameters of the OARs was between V_5Gy-central lung distance for the ipsilateral lung and the V_5Gy-maximum heart distance for the heart in all plans. These results demonstrate that variations in the tangential field arrangement at the posterior border for optimal coverage of the PTV may not considerably affect the dose received by the OARs.

Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility

Background

Studying the clinical utility of deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) in left breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) was aimed at focusing on dosimetry and feasibility aspects.

Methods

In this prospective trial all enrolled patients went through planning CT in supine position under both DIBH and free breathing (FB); in whole breast irradiation (WBI) cases prone CT was also taken. In 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast doses were analyzed. The acceptance of DIBH technique as reported by the patients and the staff was analyzed; post-RT side-effects including radiation lung changes (visual scores and lung density measurements) were collected.

Results

Among 130 enrolled patients 26 were not suitable for the technique while in 16, heart or LAD dose constraints were not met in the DIBH plans. Among 54 and 34 patients receiving WBI and postmastectomy/nodal RT, respectively with DIBH, mean heart dose (MHD) was reduced to < 50%, the heart V_{25 Gy} to < 20%, the LAD mean dose to < 40% and the LAD maximum dose to about 50% as compared to that under FB; the magnitude of benefit was related to the relative increase of the ipsilateral lung volume at DIBH. Nevertheless, heart and LAD dose differences (DIBH vs. FB) individually varied. Among the WBI cases at least one heart/LAD dose parameter was more favorable in the prone or in the supine FB plan in 15 and 4 cases, respectively; differences were numerically small. All DIBH patients completed the RT, inter-fraction repositioning accuracy and radiation side-effects were similar to that of other breast RT techniques. Both the patients and radiographers were satisfied with the technique.

Conclusions

DIBH is an excellent heart sparing technique in breast RT, but about one-third of the patients do not benefit from that otherwise laborious procedure or benefit less than from an alternative method.

Trial registration: retrospectively registered under ISRCTN14360721 (February 12, 2021)

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01816-3.

Comparison of Dosimetric Parameters of Three- Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity- Modulated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Modified Radical Mastectomy

Introduction Adjuvant radiotherapy has an important role in preventing locoregional recurrences. But radiation-induced late sequelae have become an important area of concern. The ideal postmastectomy radiotherapy technique is an area of controversy. The present study was designed to compare two widely practiced conformal techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), in terms of dosimetry.

Material and Methods A total of 50 postmodified radical mastectomy patients were selected and were randomized to treatment either by 3DCRT or IMRT technique. Two opposing tangential beams were used in 3DCRT plans whereas five to seven tangential beams were used for IMRT plans. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The dosimetric parameters were compared for planning target volume (PTV), lungs, heart, and left ventricle, opposite breast and esophagus.

Results The dosimetric parameters of PTV in terms of D95%, D90%, D50%, and Dmean showed no significant difference among both techniques. The IMRT technique had significantly better mean values of Dnear-min/D98% (45.56 vs. 37.92 Gy; p = 0.01) and Dnear-max/D2% (51.47 vs. 53.65 Gy; p < 0.001). Also, conformity index (1.07 vs. 1.29; p = 0.004) and homogeneity index (0.22 vs. 0.46; p = 0.003) were significantly better in IMRT arm.

The dosimetric parameters of ipsilateral lung were significantly higher in IMRT arm in terms of mean dose (19.92 vs. 14.69 Gy; p < 0.001) and low/medium dose regions (V5, V10, V13, V15, V20; p < 0.05). However, high-dose regions (V40) were significantly higher in 3DCRT arm (15.57 vs. 19.89 Gy; p = 0.02). In contralateral lung also, mean dose was significantly higher in IMRT technique (3.63 vs. 0.53 Gy; p < 0.0001) along with low-dose regions (V5, V10, V13, V15; p < 0.05) while V20 was comparable between both the arms.

In left-sided patients, the heart dose favored 3DCRT technique in terms of mean dose (17.33 vs. 8.51 Gy; p = 0.003), low/medium dose regions (V5, V10, V20; p < 0.05), and doses to partial/whole volumes (D33, D67, D100). But the high-dose regions (V25, V30, V40) were comparable between both the arms. The dosimetry of left ventricle also showed significantly lesser values of mean dose and V5 in 3DCRT technique (p < 0.0001).

The opposite breast also showed higher mean dose with IMRT technique (2.60 vs. 1.47 Gy; p = 0.009) along with higher V5 (11.60 vs. 3.83 Gy; p = 0.001). The dosimetric parameters of esophagus showed higher mean dose in IMRT technique (10.04 vs. 3.24 Gy; p < 0.0001) but the high-dose regions V35 and V50 were comparable between both the arms.

Conclusion A clear advantage could not be demonstrated with any of the techniques. The IMRT technique led to more conformal and homogenous dose distribution with reduction in high-dose regions in ipsilateral lung while the 3DCRT technique showed lesser mean dose to organs at risk (OARs). The exposure of large volumes of OARs to low doses in IMRT technique may translate to increased long-term radiation-induced complications. The shortcomings of 3DCRT technique can be overcome by using multiple subfields within tangential fields.

Safely achieving single prolonged breath-holds of > 5 minutes for radiotherapy in the prone, front crawl position

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer radiotherapy is increasingly delivered supine with multiple, short breath-holds. There may be heart and lung sparing advantages for locoregional breast cancer of both prone treatment and in a single breath-hold. We test here whether single prolonged breath-holds are possible in the prone, front crawl position.

METHODS

19 healthy volunteers were trained to deliver supine, single prolonged breath-holds with pre-oxygenation and hypocapnia. We tested whether all could achieve the same durations in the prone, front crawl position.

RESULTS

19 healthy volunteers achieved supine, single prolonged breath-holds for mean of 6.2 ± 0.3 min. All were able to hold safely for the same duration while prone (6.1 ± 0.2 min ns. by paired ANOVA). With prone, the increased weight on the chest did not impede chest inflation, nor the ability to hold air in the chest. Thus, the rate of chest deflation (mean anteroposterior deflation movement of three craniocaudally arranged surface markers on the spinal cord) was the same (1.2 ± 0.2, 2.0 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.4 mm/min) as found previously during supine prolonged breath-holds. No leakage of carbon dioxide or air was detectable into the facemask.

CONCLUSION

Single prolonged (>5 min) breath-holds are equally possible in the prone, front crawl position.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Prolonged breath-holds in the front crawl position are possible and have the same durations as in the supine position. Such training would therefore be feasible for some patients with breast cancer requiring loco-regional irradiation. It would have obvious advantages for hypofractionation.

Variation of heart and lung radiation doses according to setup uncertainty in left breast cancer

PURPOSE

Breast radiotherapy set-up is often uncertain. Actual dose distribution to normal tissues could be different from planned dose distribution. The objective of this study was to investigate such difference in dose distribution according to the extent of set-up error in breast radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 Gy with fraction size of 2 Gy was given to 30 left breasts with different set-ups applying a deep inspiration breath holding (DIBH) or a free breathing (FB) technique. Under the assumption that errors might come from translational axes of deep or caudal directions, the isocenter was shifted from the original tangential alignment every 2.5 mm to simulate uncertainty of deep and caudal tangential set-up in DIBH and FB. Changes were evaluated for dosimetric parameters for the heart, the left ventricle (LV), the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and the ipsilateral lung.

RESULTS

On the original plan, mean doses of heart and ipsilateral lung were 2.0 ± 1.1 Gy and 3.7 ± 1.4 Gy in DIBH and 8.4 ± 1.3 Gy and 7.8 ± 1.5 Gy in FB, respectively. The change of dose distribution for the heart in DIBH was milder than that in FB. The deeper the tangential set-up, the worse the heart, LV, LAD, and ipsilateral lung doses, showing as much as 49.4%, 56.4%, 90.3%, and 26.1% shifts, respectively, in 5 mm DIBH setup. The caudal set-up did not show significant dose difference. In multiple comparison of DIBH, differences of mean dose occurred in all 7.5 mm deep set-ups for the heart (p = 0.025), the LV (p = 0.049), and LAD (p = 0.025) in DIBH.

CONCLUSIONS

To correct set-up error over indicated limitation for deep tangential set-up in DIBH at 5 mm action level, mean heart and ipsilateral lung doses are expected to increase approximately 50% and 25%, respectively.

Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial

Purpose

Quality assessment of the treatment plans in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) HYPO trial was carried out based on prospectively reported dosimetric parameters and evidence-based dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy were derived.

Materials and methods

From 2009 to 2014, 1882 patients (pts) were randomised between 50 Gy/25fractions (fr) versus 40 Gy/15fr. Doses to CTVp_breast (V_95%, V_107%-V_110%, D_max, and in addition for 40 Gy plans V_105%-V_107%), ipsilateral lung (V_20Gy/V_17Gy), heart (V_20Gy/V_17Gy, V_40Gy/V_35Gy), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) (D_max) and use of respiratory gated technique were prospectively reported to the DBCG database. After end of accrual, these dosimetric parameters from all plans in the trial were compared to the pre-specified treatment constraints.

Results

In total, 1854 pts from eight radiation therapy (RT) centres in three countries were treated. No statistically significant differences were found between the results for 40 Gy and 50 Gy plans, except for CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V_107%-V_110%). Of the 40 Gy pts, 90% with CTVp_breast > 600 mL and 95% with CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL had a CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V_105%-V_107%) <2%. In 95% of the 50 Gy plans, the CTVp_breast absolute hot-spot volume (V_107%-V_110%) was <0.5 mL and 1.7 mL for CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL and > 600 mL, respectively. Compliance was >99% for both heart and lung constraints. Largest deviation from protocol constraints was found for the volume of CTVp_breast covered with 95% of the prescription dose or more (V_95%). The CTV dose coverage (V_95%) was >94.3% in 95% of the right-sided pts, whereas the figures for 95% of the left-sided pts treated with and without respiratory gating were 93.2% and 88.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

A high degree of compliance with protocol dose constraints was found for treatment plans in the DBCG HYPO trial. New constraints for dose to organs at risk and high-dose volumes in the breast are suggested for breast-only RT planning.