Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. A propensity score matched analysis

ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Target delineation in glioblastoma is still a matter of extensive research and debate. This guideline aims to update the existing joint European consensus on delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in adult glioblastoma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ESTRO Guidelines Committee identified 14 European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee and EANO who discussed and analysed the body of evidence concerning contemporary glioblastoma target delineation, then took part in a two-step modified Delphi process to address open questions.

RESULTS

Several key issues were identified and are discussed including i) pre-treatment steps and immobilisation, ii) target delineation and the use of standard and novel imaging techniques, and iii) technical aspects of treatment including planning techniques and fractionation. Based on the EORTC recommendation focusing on the resection cavity and residual enhancing regions on T1-sequences with the addition of a reduced 15 mm margin, special situations are presented with corresponding potential adaptations depending on the specific clinical situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The EORTC consensus recommends a single clinical target volume definition based on postoperative contrast-enhanced T1 abnormalities, using isotropic margins without the need to cone down. A PTV margin based on the individual mask system and IGRT procedures available is advised; this should usually be no greater than 3 mm when using IGRT.

Feasibility of clinical target volume reduction for glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation based on patterns of failure analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze recurrence patterns in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) after standard chemoradiation according to different target volume delineation strategies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred seven patients with GBM who recurred after standard chemoradiation were evaluated. According to ESTRO target volume delineation guideline, the CTV was generated by adding a 2-cm margin to the GTV, defined as the resection cavity plus residual tumor. Patterns of failure were analyzed using dose-volume histogram. Recurrent lesions were defined as in-field, marginal, or distant if > 80 %, 20-80 %, or < 20 % of the intersecting volume was included in the 95 % isodose line.For each patient, a theoretical plan consisting of reduced 1-cm GTV-to-CTV margin was created to compare patterns of failure and radiation doses to normal brain.

RESULTS

Median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 15.3 months and 7.8 months, respectively, from the date of surgery. Recurrences were in-field in 180, marginal in 5, and distant in 22 patients. According to MGMT promoter methylation, distant recurrences occurred in 18.6 % of methylated and 6 % of unmethylated tumors (p = 0.0046). Following replanning with 1-cm reduced margin, dosimetric analysis showed similar patterns of failure. Recurrences were in-field, marginal, and distant in 177, 3, and 27 plans, respectively, although radiation doses to the healthy brain and hippocampi were significantly lower compared with standard target delineation (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Current provide the rationale for evaluating GTV-to-CTV margin reduction in future clinical trials with the aim of limiting the cognitive sequelae of GBM irradiation while maintaining survival benefits of standard chemoradiation.

Moderately hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy with temozolomide for young and fit patients with glioblastoma: an institutional experience and meta-analysis of literature

PURPOSE

Shorter hypofractionated radiation therapy (HF-RT) schedules may have radiobiological, patient convenience and healthcare resource advantages over conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CF-RT) in glioblastoma (GBM). We report outcomes of young, fit GBM patients treated with HF-RT and CF-RT during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a meta-analysis of HF-RT literature in this patient subgroup.

METHODS

Hospital records of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM treated with HF-RT (50 Gy/20 fractions) and CF-RT (60 Gy/30 fractions) between January 2020 and September 2021 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis. A systematic search and meta-analysis of studies from January 2000 to January 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

41 patients were treated (HF-RT:15, CF-RT:26). For both HF-RT and CF-RT groups, median age was 58 years and 80-90% were ECOG 0-1. There were more methylated tumours in the HF-RT group. All patients received concurrent/adjuvant temozolomide. At 19.2 months median follow-up, median OS was 19.8 months and not-reached for HF-RT and CF-RT (p = 0.5), and median PFS was 7.7 and 5.8 months, respectively (p = 0.8). HF-RT or CF-RT did not influence OS/PFS on univariable analysis. Grade 3 radionecrosis rate was 6.7% and 7.7%, respectively. 15 of 1135 studies screened from a systematic search were eligible for meta-analysis. For studies involving temozolomide, pooled median OS and PFS with HF-RT were 17.5 and 9.9 months (927 and 862 patients). Studies using shortened HF-RT schedules reported 0-2% Grade 3 radionecrosis rates.

CONCLUSION

HF-RT may offer equivalent outcomes and reduce treatment burden compared to CF-RT in young, fit GBM patients.

Peritumoral edema status of glioblastoma identifies patients reaching long-term disease control with specific progression patterns after tumor resection and high-dose proton boost

Background

Glioblastoma peritumoral edema (PE) extent is associated with survival and progression pattern after tumor resection and radiotherapy (RT). To increase tumor control, proton beam was adopted to give high-dose boost (> 90 Gy). However, the correlation between PE extent and prognosis of glioblastoma after postoperative high-dose proton boost (HDPB) therapy stays unknown. We intend to utilize the PE status to classify the survival and progression patterns.

Methods

Patients receiving HDPB (96.6 GyE) were retrospectively evaluated. Limited peritumoral edema (LPE) was defined as PE extent < 3 cm with a ratio of PE extent to tumor maximum diameter of < 0.75. Extended progressive disease (EPD) was defined as progression of tumors extending > 1 cm from the tumor bed edge.

Results

After long-term follow-up (median 88.7, range 63.6–113.8 months) for surviving patients with (n = 13) and without (n = 32) LPE, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 77.2 vs. 16.7 months (p = 0.004) and 13.6 vs. 8.6 months (p = 0.02), respectively. In multivariate analyses combined with factors of performance, age, tumor maximum diameter, and tumor resection extent, LPE remained a significant factor for favorable OS and PFS. The rates of 5-year complete response, EPD, and distant metastasis with and without LPE were 38.5% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.005), 7.7% vs. 40.6% (p = 0.04), and 0% vs. 34.4% (p = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusions

The LPE status effectively identified patients with relative long-term control and specific progression patterns after postoperative HDPB for glioblastoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03765-6.

The efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in glioblastoma (GBM) without age restrictions remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis is to access the survival outcomes of HFRT in these patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted up to June 1, 2020. The main evaluation data were the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months and 24 months and the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 and 12 months. The secondary evaluation data was the incidence of radionecrosis and adverse events. The study was performed using R "meta" package.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, which totally contained 484 participants. The 12-month OS and 24-month OS rate of HFRT in GBM were 71.3% and 34.8%, while the 6-month PFS and 12-month rate were 74.0% and 40.8%. Compared to low-BED (biological equivalent dose) schedules (<78Gy), high-BED schedules may increase survival benefit both in PFS-6 (P=0.003) and PFS-12 (P=0.011), while the difference did not show on OS. Different dose per fraction had no significant effect on both OS and PFS. Incidence of radionecrosis was 14.2%. Although the overall incidence of adverse reactions cannot be quantified, the toxicity of HFRT was acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with survival data for standard treatment, HFRT seemed to improve overall survival and progression-free survival, while high BED schedules may future increase benefit on PFS. Meanwhile, the toxicity of HFRT was tolerable. Further randomised controlled clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A systematic review of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma

Multiple glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is classified as multifocal and multicentric GBM according to whether there is communication between the lesions. Multiple GBM is more genetically heterogeneous, aggressive and resistant to chemoradiotherapy than unifocal GBM, and has a worse prognosis. There is no international consensus on the treatment of multiple GBM. This review discusses some paradigms of multiple GBM and focuses on the heterogeneity spread pathway, imaging diagnosis, pathology, molecular characterization and prognosis of multifocal and multicentric GBM. Several promising therapeutic methods of multiple GBM are also recommended.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

IMAGING

Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

SURGERY

Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery.

NEUROPATHOLOGY

Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

RADIATION

Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy.

MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY

Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies.

NOVEL THERAPIES

Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

The role of radiation therapy in treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. QUESTION 1 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the addition of radiation therapy (RT) more beneficial than management without RT in improving survival?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level I: Radiation therapy (RT) is recommended for the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant glioblastoma in adults. QUESTION 2 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the RT regimen of 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions more beneficial than alternative regimens in providing survival benefit while minimizing toxicity?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level I: Treatment schemes should include dosage of up to 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions that includes the enhancing area. QUESTION 3 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is a tailored target volume superior to regional RT for reduction of radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining efficacy?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: It is recommended that radiation therapy planning include 1-2 cm margin around the radiographically T1 weighted contrast-enhancing tumor volume or the T2 weighted abnormality on MRI. Level III: Recalculation of the radiation volume during RT treatment may be necessary to reduce the radiated volume of normal brain since the volume of surgical defect will change during the long period of RT. QUESTION 4 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT of the subventricular zone to standard tumor volume treatment improve tumor control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

No recommendation can be formulated as there is contradictory evidence in favor of and against intentional radiation of the subventricular zone (SVZ) QUESTION 5 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT to surgical intervention improve disease control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Radiation therapy is recommended for treatment of elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to improve overall survival. QUESTION 6 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does modification of RT dose and fractionation scheme from standard regimens decrease toxicity and improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: Short RT treatment schemes are recommended in frail and elderly patients as compared to conventional 60 Gy given in 2 daily fractions because overall survival is not different while RT risk profile is better for the short RT scheme. Level II: The 40.05 Gy dose given in 15 fractions or 25 Gy dose given in 5 fractions or 34 Gy dose given in 10 fractions should be considered as appropriate doses for Short RT treatments in elderly and/or frail patients. QUESTION 7 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is there advantage to delaying the initiation of RT instead of starting it 2 weeks after surgical intervention in decreasing radiation-induced toxicity and improving disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that RT for patients with newly diagnosed GBM starts within 6 weeks of surgical intervention as compared to later times. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the optimal specific post-operative day within the 6 weeks interval to start RT for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that have undergone surgical resection. QUESTION 8 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma is Image-Modulated RT (IMRT) or similar techniques as effective as standard regional RT in providing tumor control and improve survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: There is no evidence that IMRT is a better RT delivering modality when compared to conventional RT in improving overall survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Hence, IMRT should not be preferred over the Conventional RT delivery modality. QUESTION 9 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma does the use of radiosensitizers with RT improve the efficacy of RT as determined by disease control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Iododeoxyuridine is not recommended to be used as radiosensitizer during RT treatment for patients with newly diagnosed GBM QUESTION 10 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the use of Ultrafractionated RT superior to standard fractionation regimens in improving disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

There is insufficient evidence to formulate a recommendation regarding the use of ultrafractionated RT schemes and patient population that could benefit from it. QUESTION 11 : In patients with poor prognosis with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is hypofractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Hypofractionated RT schemes may be used for patients with poor prognosis and limited survival without compromising response. There is insufficient evidence in the literature for us to be able to recommend the optimal hypofractionated RT scheme that will confer longest overall survival and/or confer the same overall survival with less toxicities and shorter treatment time. QUESTION 12 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of brachytherapy to standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Brachytherapy as a boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in the routine management of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 13 : In elderly patients (> 65 year old) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma under what circumstances is accelerated hyperfractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Accelerated Hyperfractionated RT with a total RT dose of 45 Gy or 48 Gy has been shown to shorten the treatment time without detriment in survival when compared to conventional external beam RT and should be considered as an option for treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 14 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) boost to conventional standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Stereotactic Radiosurgery boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in patients undergoing routine management of newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

Distributions of intravenous injected iodine nanoparticles in orthotopic u87 human glioma xenografts over time and tumor therapy

Aim: To analyze the localization, distribution and effect of iodine nanoparticles (INPs) on radiation therapy (RT) in advanced intracerebral gliomas over time after intravenous injection. Materials & methods: Luciferase/td-tomato expressing U87 human glioma cells were implanted into mice which were injected intravenously with INPs. Mice with gliomas were followed for tumor progression and survival. Immune-stained mouse brain sections were examined and quantified by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Results: INPs injected intravenously 3 days prior to RT, compared with 1 day, showed greater association with CD31-staining structures, accumulated inside tumor cells more, covered more of the tumor cell surface and trended toward increased median survival. Conclusion: INP persistence and redistribution in tumors over time may enable greater RT enhancement and clinically relevant hypo-fractionated-RT and may enhance INP efficacy.

Survival after hypofractionation in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite a multi modal treatment that includes normofractionated radiotherapy. So, various hypofractionated alternatives to normofractionated RT have been tested to improve such prognosis. There is need of systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the literature properly and maybe generalised the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was first, to perform a meta-analysis of all controlled trials testing the impact of hypofractionation on survival without age restriction and secondly, to analyse data from all non-comparative trials testing the impact of hypofractionation, radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic RT in first line.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify all publications testing the impact of hypofractionation in glioblastoma between 1985 and March 2020. Combined hazard ratio from comparative studies was calculated for overall survival. The impact of study design, age and use of adjuvant temozolomide was explored by stratification. Meta-regressions were performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

2283 publications were identified. Eleven comparative trials were included. No impact on overall survival was evidenced (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.89-1.28) without age restriction. The analysis of non-comparative literature revealed heterogeneous outcomes with limited quality of reporting. Concurrent chemotherapy, completion of surgery, immobilization device, isodose of prescription, and prescribed dose (depending on tumour volume) were poorly described. However, results on survival are encouraging and were correlated with the percentage of resected patients and with patients age but not with median dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Because few trials were randomized and because the limited quality of reporting, it is difficult to define the place of hypofactionation in glioblastoma. In first line, hypofractionation resulted in comparable survival outcome with the benefit of a shortened duration. The method used to assess hypofractionation needs to be improved.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma and poor prognostic factors. A prospective, single-institution experience

Background

Hypofractionated radiation therapy is a feasible and safe treatment option in elderly and frail patients with glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hypofractionated radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide in terms of feasibility and disease control in primary glioblastoma patients with poor prognostic factors other than advanced age, such as post-surgical neurological complications, high tumor burden, unresectable or multifocal lesions, and potential low treatment compliance due to social factors or rapidly progressive disease.

Material and methods

GTV included the surgical cavity plus disease visible in T1WI-MRI, FLAIR-MRI and in the MET-uptake. The CTV was defined as the GTV plus 1.5–2 cm margin; the PTV was the CTV+0.3 cm margin. Forty, fourty-five, and fifty grays in 15 fractions were prescribed to 95% of PTV, CTV, and GTV, respectively. Treatment was delivered using IMRT or the VMAT technique. Simultaneously, 75 mg/m²/day of temozolomide were administered.

Results

Between January 2010 and November 2017, we treated a total of 17 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 68-years; median KPS was 50–70%. MGMT-methylation status was negative in 5 patients, and 8 patients were IDH-wildtype. Eight of 18 patients were younger than 65-years. Median tumor volume was 26.95cc; median PTV volume was 322cc. Four lesions were unresectable; 6 patients underwent complete surgical resection. Median residual volume was 1.14cc. Progression-free survival was 60% at 6 months, 33% at 1-year and 13% at 2-years (median OS = 7 months). No acute grade 3–5 toxicities were documented. Symptomatic grade 3 radiation necrosis was observed in one patient.

Conclusions

Patients with poor clinical factors other than advanced age can be selected for hypofractionated radiotherapy. The OS and PFS rates obtained in our series are similar to those in patients treated with standard fractionation, assuring good treatment adherence, low rates of toxicity and probable improved cost-effectiveness.

Paediatric gliomas: diagnosis, molecular biology and management

Paediatric gliomas represent the most common brain tumour in children. Early diagnosis and treatment greatly improve survival. Histological grade is the most significant classification system affecting treatment planning and prognosis. Paediatric gliomas depend on pathways and genes responsible for mitotic activity and cell proliferation as well as angiogenesis (MAPK, VEGF, EFGR pathways). Symptoms such as focal neurologic deficit or seizures can facilitate diagnosis, but they are not always present and therefore diagnosis is occasionally delayed. Imaging has adequate diagnostic accuracy (surpassing 90%), and novel imaging techniques such as MR spectroscopy and PET increase only slightly this percentage. Low grade gliomas (LGG) can be approached conservatively but most authors suggest surgical excision. High grade gliomas (HGG) are always operated with exception of specific contradictions including butterfly or extensive dominant hemisphere gliomas. Surgical excision is universally followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which slightly increase survival. Inoperable cases can be managed with or without radiosurgery depending on location and size, with adjunctive use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Surgical excision must be aggressive and gross total resection (GTR) should be attempted, if possible, since it can triple survival. Radiosurgery is effective on smaller tumours of <2 cm2. Surgical excision is always the treatment of choice, but glioma recurrences, and residual tumours in non-critical locations are candidates for radiosurgery especially if tumour volume is low. Management of recurrences includes surgery, radiosurgery and chemoradiotherapy and it should be individualized according to location and size. In combination with molecular targeted therapeutic schemes, glioma management will be immensely improved in the next years.