MRI guided focal HDR brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Toxicity, biochemical outcome and quality of life

US-guided EM tracked system for HDR brachytherapy: A first in-men randomized study for whole prostate treatment

PURPOSE

An electromagnetic tracking device (EMT) has been integrated in an HDR 3D ultrasound guidance system for prostate HDR. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of HDR workflows with and without EM tracking.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 58 patients with a 15 Gy HDR prostate boost were randomized in two arms and two operation room (OR) procedures using: (1) the EMT investigational device, and (2) the Oncentra prostate system (OCP). OR times were compared for both techniques.

RESULTS

The overall procedure median time was about 20% shorter for EMT (63 min) compared to OCP (79 min). The US acquisition and contouring was longer for OCP compared to EMT (23 min vs. 16 min). The catheter reconstruction's median times were 23 min and 13 min for OCP and EMT respectively. For the automatic reconstruction with EMT, 62% of cases required no or few manual corrections. Using the EM technology in an OR environment was challenging. In some cases, interferences or the stiffness of the stylet introduced errors in the reconstruction of catheters. The last step was the dosimetry with median times of 11 min (OCP) and 15.5 min (EMT). Finally, it was observed that there was no learning curve associated with the introduction of this new technology.

CONCLUSIONS

The EMT device offers an efficient solution for automatic catheter reconstruction for HDR prostate while reducing the possibility of mis-reconstructed catheters caused by issues of visualization in the US images. Because of that, the overall OR times was shorter when using the EMT system.

Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Preliminary results from a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate preliminary outcomes of a prospective trial of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

In our prospective study, data from patients who underwent this treatment between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were analyzed. In the procedure, the applicator needle was inserted through the perineum to target the lesion on the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, which was fused onto the transrectal ultrasound image. The prescription dose was set at a single fraction of 19 Gy. Data from patients who received whole-gland high-dose-rate brachytherapy were extracted and compared with data from patients who received ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy, to evaluate the frequency of acute adverse events.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a median observation period of 7.75 months (range 5.96-15.36 months). No acute genitourinary or gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in this cohort. The planned procedure was completed in all patients, and no unexpected adverse events were observed; however, prostate-specific antigen failure was detected in one patient. In the 25 patients who underwent whole-gland high-dose-rate brachytherapy, acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in 88% and 20% of the patients, respectively. Ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy was a significant factor in avoiding acute adverse genitourinary events in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer is a safe and feasible treatment without acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events. Long-term observation and further investigation are warranted.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: Making the punishment fit the crime

BACKGROUND

Focal therapy is recently gaining popularity as an intermediate option between active surveillance and whole-gland treatment for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This comprehensive review aims to present the different focal therapy technologies available to date while tackling the rationale for focal treatment, its indications, principles and outcomes of each technique.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was done. Keywords used for research were: "prostate cancer"; "focal therapy"; "focal treatment"; "High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound"; "cryotherapy"; "photodynamic therapy"; "focal laser ablation"; "irreversible electroporation"; "focal brachytherapy" and "gold nanoparticle directed therapy". Accepted languages were English and French.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Choosing the best candidate for focal therapy is crucial (localized small to medium sized Gleason≤7 lesions). Focal high-intensity focal ultrasound has shown excellent survival rates at 5 years, while maintaining good functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function). Focal cryotherapy, one of the oldest focal treatments for prostate cancer, has shown good oncologic outcomes, with good continence rates and fair erectile function rates. Focal laser ablation seems a safe and feasible technique, with promising results. Irreversible electroporation has demonstrated good survival outcomes with no biochemical recurrence or disease relapse in the preliminary studies. Focal brachytherapy has a good toxicity profile, a good biochemical outcome, and gives a sustained quality of life. Finally, gold nanoparticle directed therapy is safe and is being studied in current trials.

CONCLUSION

While proven to be safe in terms of continence and sexual aspects, the challenge remains to better assess oncological outcomes of these techniques in randomized longer follow-up studies.

MRI-TRUS registration methodology for TRUS-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

High‐dose‐rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy is an established technique for whole‐gland treatment. For transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)‐guided HDR prostate brachytherapy, image fusion with a magnetic resonance image (MRI) can be performed to make use of its soft‐tissue contrast. The MIM treatment planning system has recently introduced image registration specifically for HDR prostate brachytherapy and has incorporated a Predictive Fusion workflow, which allows clinicians to attempt to compensate for differences in patient positioning between imaging modalities. In this study, we investigate the accuracy of the MIM algorithms for MRI‐TRUS fusion, including the Predictive Fusion workflow.

Materials and Methods

A radiation oncologist contoured the prostate gland on both TRUS and MRI. Four registration methodologies to fuse the MRI and the TRUS images were considered: rigid registration (RR), contour‐based (CB) deformable registration, Predictive Fusion followed by RR (pfRR), and Predictive Fusion followed by CB deformable registration (pfCB). Registrations were compared using the mean distance to agreement and the Dice similarity coefficient for the prostate as contoured on TRUS and the registered MRI prostate contour.

Results

Twenty patients treated with HDR prostate brachytherapy at our center were included in this retrospective evaluation. For the cohort, mean distance to agreement was 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, 0.60 ± 0.08 mm, 2.0 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.06 mm for RR, CB, pfRR, and pfCB, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients were 0.80 ± 0.05, 0.93 ± 0.02, 0.81 ± 0.03, and 0.93 ± 0.01 for RR, CB, pfRR, and pfCB, respectively. The inclusion of the Predictive Fusion workflow did not significantly improve the quality of the registration.

Conclusions

The CB deformable registration algorithm in the MIM treatment planning system yielded the best geometric registration indices. MIM offers a commercial platform allowing for easier access and integration into clinical departments with the potential to play an integral role in future focal therapy applications for prostate cancer.

Commissioning of an intra-operative US guided prostate HDR system integrating an EM tracking technology

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-based planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy is commonly used in the clinic, mainly because it offers fast real-time image-guided capability at a relatively low cost. The main difficulty with US planning is the catheter reconstruction due to artefacts (from multiple catheters) and echogenicity. Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) system offers a fast and accurate solution for automatic reconstruction of catheters using the EMT technology. In this study, the commissioning and performance evaluation of the new real-time prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy investigational system from Philips Disease Management Solutions integrating EMT was performed before its clinical integration.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The Philips' clinical investigational system includes a treatment planning software (TPS) that was commissioned based on AAPM TG53 and TG56 recommendations for the use of TPS in brachytherapy. First, the CIRS - model 045A - QA phantom was used to evaluate the ultrasound (US) image quality and 3D image handling. Distances, volumes, and dimensions of the structures inside the phantom were measured and compared to the actual values. The calibration reproducibility and accuracy of the electromagnetic (EM) sensor used to track the US probe (rotation and translation) were performed using a specifically designed QA tool mounted on the probe and immersed in a salted water tank. This was performed for 3 different B&K 8848 US probes to evaluate the sensitivity of EM calibration to the probe geometric properties (manufacturing process). The new TPS performance was compared to that in OncentraBrachy (OcB) V4.5.5 (Elekta) using 30 clinical cases as part of a retrospective study. Following the system commissioning, clinical workflows were explored; tests were performed with the brachytherapy team on phantoms and finally implemented in the clinic.

RESULTS

US image quality evaluation showed a mean difference with actual dimensions (lengths, widths and distances) of 0.4 mm (±0.3 mm) and mean difference in volume sizes of 0.2 cc (±0.2 cc). Then, the calibration of the US-to-EM coordinate system was performed for 3 different probes. For each probe, 3 measurements were acquired for every position of the calibration tool and measurements were repeated 3 times for a total of 27 measurements per probe per plane. The error was slightly higher in transverse mode compared to sagittal mode with mean values of 0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm respectively. 30 clinical cases were used to compare the new TPS performance to OcB (IPSA). Optimized plans obtained with both systems were all clinically acceptable, but the plans from the Philips system have slightly higher V150% values, V200% values and dose to organs at risk. In the case of organs at risk, plans could have been manually modified to reduce the dose. Philips' system had a larger number of active dwell positions and longer treatment times.

CONCLUSIONS

The first clinical version of Philips' system was proven to be stable, accurate and precise. The fully integrated EM tracking technology opens the way for automated catheter reconstruction and on-the-fly dynamical replanning.

Artificial intelligence and imaging biomarkers for prostate radiation therapy during and after treatment

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). Quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters, derived from multi-parametric MRI, provide indirect measures of tumour characteristics such as cellularity, angiogenesis and hypoxia. Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), relevant information and patterns can be efficiently identified in these complex data to develop quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) of tumour function and biology. Such QIBs have already demonstrated potential in the diagnosis and staging of PCa. In this review, we explore the role of these QIBs in monitoring treatment response during and after PCa radiotherapy (RT). Recurrence of PCa after RT is not uncommon, and early detection prior to development of metastases provides an opportunity for salvage treatments with curative intent. However, the current method of monitoring treatment response using prostate-specific antigen levels lacks specificity. QIBs, derived from qMRI and developed using AI techniques, can be used to monitor biological changes post-RT providing the potential for accurate and early diagnosis of recurrent disease.

Erectile function after focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review

Focal therapy modalities achieved interest in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) over the last a few years. This systematic review was aimed to investigate erectile function after focal therapy for localized PCa. Twenty-six out of 1287 reports were identified through a database systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science, supplemented with hand search, on June 1st, 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. Focal therapy modalities investigated were cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), photodynamic therapy (TOOKAD), irreversible electroporation (IRE), and focal radiotherapy (RT) (i.e. brachytherapy or stereotactic RT). Overall, reported sexual function outcomes after these treatment modalities were generally good, with many studies reporting a complete recovery of EF at 1-year follow-up. However, the quality of current evidence is affected both by the lack of well-conducted comparative studies and by a significant heterogeneity in terms of study design, study population, erectile and sexual function assessment modalities.

Interim Results of a Prospective Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Directed Focal Stereotactic Reirradiation Trial for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To report the feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary outcomes (metabolic and biochemical) of ⁶⁸Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-directed focal prostate reirradiation using linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 2016 to March 2019, 25 patients were enrolled in a prospective single institution trial (ACTRN12617000035325). Eligibility criteria included patients with biopsy proven isolated prostate recurrence after definitive irradiation, with concordant multiparametric MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings, and a prostate-specific antigen of less than 15 ng/mL at the time of recurrence. The study included a sequential dose escalation component with the first 18 patients receiving 36 Gy in 6 fractions on alternate days with subsequent patients receiving 38 Gy in 6 fractions assuming acceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Median age was 72 years (range, 62-83) with a median time between first radiation treatment and salvage SBRT of 8.3 years (range, 4.5- 13.6). Median prostate-specific antigen at reirradiation was 4.1 (range, 1.1-16.6). The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 13-46). Acute grade 1 and 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 6 (24%) and 1 (4%) men, respectively. Acute grade 1 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 8% with one acute grade 3 GI toxicity (4%) due to a rectal ulcer overlying the hydrogel. Late grade 1 and 2 GU toxicity occurred in 28% and 4%. Late grade 1 GI toxicity occurred in 8% with no grade 2 or greater toxicity. Twenty-four patients have undergone per-protocol 12-month ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT, of which 23 (92%) demonstrated a complete metabolic response. Biochemical freedom from failure was 80% at 2 years with 3 out of 4 of the biochemical failures exhibiting recurrent local disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA-directed salvage focal reirradiation to the prostate using linear accelerator-based SBRT is feasible and safe. Toxicity was low, with very favorable short term local and biochemical control in a carefully selected cohort of patients.

Automatic multi-catheter detection using deeply supervised convolutional neural network in MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is an established technique to be used as monotherapy option or focal boost in conjunction with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for treating prostate cancer. Radiation source path reconstruction is a critical procedure in HDR treatment planning. Manually identifying the source path is labor intensive and time inefficient. In recent years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a valuable imaging modality for image-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy due to its superb soft-tissue contrast for target delineation and normal tissue contouring. The purpose of this study is to investigate a deep-learning-based method to automatically reconstruct multiple catheters in MRI for prostate cancer HDR brachytherapy treatment planning.

METHODS

Attention gated U-Net incorporated with total variation (TV) regularization model was developed for multi-catheter segmentation in MRI. The attention gates were used to improve the accuracy of identifying small catheter points, while TV regularization was adopted to encode the natural spatial continuity of catheters into the model. The model was trained using the binary catheter annotation images offered by experienced physicists as ground truth paired with original MRI images. After the network was trained, MR images of a new prostate cancer patient receiving HDR brachytherapy were fed into the model to predict the locations and shapes of all the catheters. Quantitative assessments of our proposed method were based on catheter shaft and tip errors compared to the ground truth.

RESULTS

Our method detected 299 catheters from 20 patients receiving HDR prostate brachytherapy with a catheter tip error of 0.37 ± 1.68 mm and a catheter shaft error of 0.93 ± 0.50 mm. For detection of catheter tips, our method resulted in 87% of the catheter tips within an error of less than ± 2.0 mm, and more than 71% of the tips can be localized within an absolute error of no >1.0 mm. For catheter shaft localization, 97% of catheters were detected with an error of <2.0 mm, while 63% were within 1.0 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we proposed a novel multi-catheter detection method to precisely localize the tips and shafts of catheters in three-dimensional MRI images of HDR prostate brachytherapy. It paves the way for elevating the quality and outcome of MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy.

Costs and Complications After a Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Treated With Time-Efficient Modalities: An Analysis of National Medicare Data

PURPOSE

Recent trends in payer and patient preferences increasingly incentivize time-efficient (≤2-week treatment time) prostate cancer treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

National Medicare claims from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014, were analyzed to identify newly diagnosed prostate cancers. Three "radical treatment" cohorts were identified (prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) and matched to an active surveillance (AS) cohort by using inverse probability treatment weighting via propensity score. Total costs at 1 year after biopsy were calculated for each cohort, and treatment-specific costs were estimated by subtracting total 1-year costs in each radical treatment group from those in the AS group.

RESULTS

Mean 1-year adjusted costs were highest among patients receiving SBRT ($26,895), lower for prostatectomy ($23,632), and lowest for brachytherapy ($19,980), whereas those for AS were $9687. Costs of radical modalities varied significantly by region, with the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions having the highest cost ranges (>$10,000) and the West South Central and Mountain regions the lowest range in costs (<$2000). Quantification of toxic effects showed that prostatectomy was associated with higher genitourinary incontinence (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.8 compared with AS) and sexual dysfunction (HR = 3.5), whereas the radiation modalities were associated with higher genitourinary irritation/bleeding (brachytherapy HR = 1.7; SBRT HR = 1.5) and gastrointestinal ulcer/stricture/fistula (brachytherapy HR = 2.7; SBRT HR = 3.0). Overall mean toxicity costs were highest among patients treated with prostatectomy ($3500) followed by brachytherapy ($1847), SBRT ($1327), and AS ($1303).

CONCLUSIONS

Time-efficient treatment techniques exhibit substantial variability in toxicity and costs. Furthermore, geographic location substantially influenced treatment costs.

Current status and future prospective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: development of multiparametric MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided biopsy, and treatment modalities

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly used to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) because of its usefulness in combination with anatomic and functional data. MRI-targeted biopsy, such as MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion image-guided prostate biopsy, has high accuracy in the detection and localization of csPC. This novel diagnostic technique contributes to the development of tailor-made medicine as focal therapy, which cures the csPC while preserving the anatomical structures related to urinary and sexual function. In the early days of focal therapy, TRUS-guided systematic biopsy was used for patient selection, and treatment was performed for patients with low-risk PC. With the introduction of mpMRI and mapping biopsy, the treatment range is now determined based on individualized cancer localization. In recent prospective studies, 87.4% of treated patients had intermediate- and high-risk PC. However, focal therapy has two main limitations. First, a randomized controlled trial would be difficult to design because of the differences in pathological features between patients undergoing focal therapy and radical treatment. Therefore, pair-matched studies and/or historical controlled studies have been performed to compare focal therapy and radical treatment. Second, no long-term (≥ 10-year) follow-up study has been performed. However, recent prospective studies have encouraged the use of focal therapy as a treatment strategy for localized PC because it contributes to high preservation of continence and erectile function.

[68Ga-]PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for gross tumor volume delineation in a slice by slice analysis with whole mount histopathology as a reference standard - Implications for focal radiotherapy planning in primary prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Focal therapies are a promising approach to treat prostate cancer (PCa) more precisely instead of conventional whole gland treatment. Nowadays, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is routinely used for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. The aim of our study was to compare PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI for the delineation of intraprostatic tumor burden by using whole mount histopathology as a reference standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

17 prospectively enrolled patients with primary PCa underwent [⁶⁸Ga-]PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI before radical prostatectomy. PSMA-PET/CT, mpMRI and histopathology of the resected specimens were co-registered. Two teams of experts generated GTV contours for mpMRI and PET, respectively. The imaging was validated on a lesion level and slice by slice in quadrants based on the distribution of PCa in histopathology. Overall, 772 quadrants were analyzed with 414 being true positive for tumor (53.6%).

RESULTS

Median tumor volumes were 10.4 ml for GTV-histo, 10.8 ml for PSMA-PET and 4.5 ml for mpMRI. Median tumor volume in mpMRI was significant (p < 0.05) smaller than GTV-PET and GTV-histo, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 87% for PSMA-PET, 58% and 94% for mpMRI and 91% and 84% for their GTV-union. In 133 quadrants PSMA-PET/CT correctly identified tumor where mpMRI found none. MpMRI identified 19 true positive quadrants exclusively.

CONCLUSION

Our investigation demonstrates an increased consensus of PSMA-PET with histopathology compared to mpMRI for intraprostatic GTV delineation, especially with a higher sensitivity. Additionally mpMRI contours underestimate tumor volume significantly. Thus PSMA-PET may be a complementary augmentation for GTV delineation in focal therapies.

MRI-Guided Ultrafocal HDR Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Median 4-Year Results of a feasibility study

PURPOSE

For the treatment of localized prostate cancer, focal therapy has the potential to cure with fewer side effects than traditional whole-gland treatments. We report an update on toxicity, quality of life (QoL), and tumor control in our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Disease status was evaluated by systematic biopsies and 3T multiparametric MRI. The brachytherapy implant procedure under fused transrectal ultrasound/MRI guidance was followed by a 1.5 T MRI for contour adjustments and catheter position verification. A single dose of 19 Gy was delivered to the tumor with a margin of 5 mm. Genitourinary (GU) toxicity, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and erectile dysfunction (ED) were graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. QoL was measured with RAND-36, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and PR25. International Prostate Symptom Scores and International Index of Erectile Function scores were obtained. Prostate-specific antigen level was monitored, with biochemical recurrence defined as nadir + 2 ng/mL (Phoenix).

RESULTS

Thirty patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- (13%) to intermediate-risk (87%) prostate cancer were treated between May 2013 and April 2016. Median follow-up was 4 years. Median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 68-73) and median initial prostate-specific antigen level was 7.3 ng/mL (5.2-8.1). Maximum Gleason score was 4 + 3 = 7 (in 2 patients). All tumors were radiologic (MRI) stage T2. No grade >2 GU or >1 GI toxicity occurred. International Prostate Symptom Scores only deteriorated temporarily. Mild pretreatment ED deteriorated to moderate/severe ED in 50% of patients. Long-term clinically relevant QoL deterioration was seen in sexual activity and tiredness, whereas emotional and cognitive functioning improved. At 4 years, biochemical disease-free survival was 70% (95% confidence interval, 52%-93%), metastases-free survival was 93% (85%-100%), and overall survival was 100%. Of intraprostatic recurrences, 7 of 9 were out of field.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrafocal high-dose-rate brachytherapy conveys minimal GU or GI toxicity and has a marginal effect on QoL. An early decline in erectile function was seen. Tumor control outcomes are poor (biochemical disease-free survival of 70% [52%-93%] at 4 years), most likely as a result of poor patient selection.