Cognitive impairment following radiation to hippocampus and other brain structures in adults with primary brain tumours

Impact of clinical target volume margin reduction in glioblastoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is widely treated using large radiotherapy margins, resulting in substantial irradiation of the surrounding cerebral structures. In this context, the question arises whether these margins could be safely reduced. In 2018, clinical target volume (CTV) expansion was reduced in our institution from 20 to 15 mm around the gross target volume (GTV) (ie, the contrast-enhancing tumor/cavity). We sought to retrospectively analyze the impact of this reduction.

Methods

All adult patients with GBM treated between January 2015 and December 2020 with concurrent chemoradiation (60Gy/2Gy or 59.4Gy/1.8Gy) were analyzed. Patients treated using a 20 (CTV20, n = 57) or 15 mm (CTV15, n = 56) CTV margin were compared for target volumes, dose parameters to the surrounding organs, pattern of recurrence, and survival outcome.

Results

Mean GTV was similar in both groups (ie, CTV20: 39.7cm3; CTV15: 37.8cm3; P = .71). Mean CTV and PTV were reduced from 238.9cm3 to 176.7cm3 (P = .001) and from 292.6cm3 to 217.0cm3 (P < .001), for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively. As a result, average brain mean dose (Dmean) was reduced from 25.2Gy to 21.0Gy (P = .002). Significantly lower values were also observed for left hippocampus Dmean, brainstem D0.03cc, cochleas Dmean, and pituitary Dmean. Pattern of recurrence was similar, as well as patient outcome, ie, median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 7.0 months (P = .80), and median overall survival was 11.0 and 14.0 months (P = .61) for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively.

Conclusions

In GBM patients treated with chemoradiation, reducing the CTV margin from 20 to 15 mm appears to be safe and offers the potential for less treatment toxicity.

BMSCs attenuate radiation-induced brain injury induced hippocampal neuronal apoptosis through a PI3K/Akt/Bax/Bcl-2 signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSCs) -based therapies represent a promising treatment for neurological disorders. However, therapeutic effects and mechanisms of BMSCs transplantation for radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) have not been fully disclosed. In this article, we explored the functions of BMSCs transplantation on RIBI and investigated the protective effects of BMSCS on hippocampal neurons in RIBI as well as the related molecular mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

6-8 weeks-old rats were used to build a RIBI model. Rats in BMSC group were treated with a 3 × 106 BMSCs injection through the tail vein on the 1st day and 8th day after irradiation; rats in both control and RIBI groups were injected with an equivalent volume of physiological saline for comparisons. The Morris water maze was applied to detect the variations in cognitive function after RIBI. MRS was performed to test changes in NAA/Cr, indicating neuronal apoptosis after RIBI. TUNEL was conducted to detect apoptosis of rat hippocampal neurons, and HE staining was carried out to show pathological variations in the hippocampal region of rats. Protein levels of PI3K, P-PI3K, AKT, P-AKT, Bcl-2, and Bax proteins of rats in the hippocampal area were all determined by Western blot.

RESULTS

Cognitive function was reduced and hippocampal neurons underwent apoptosis in the rats of the RIBI group, and cognitive abilities, histopathological alterations, and apoptosis of hippocampal neurons were significantly improved after BMSCs treatment; the expression of PI3K, P-PI3K, AKT, P-AKT, and Bcl-2 proteins, in the hippocampal region of the rat, was up-regulated, and Bax proteins were down-regulated.

CONCLUSIONS

BMCSs can inhibit hippocampal neuronal apoptosis in RIBI, and the mechanism may be associated with the up-regulation of Bcl-2 and down-regulation of Bax by the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Long-term neurocognitive and psychological outcomes in meningioma survivors: Individual changes over time and radiation dosimetry

Background

This study investigates long-term changes in neurocognitive performance and psychological symptoms in meningioma survivors and associations with radiation dose to circumscribed brain regions.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective study of meningioma survivors who underwent longitudinal clinical neurocognitive assessments. Change in neurocognitive performance or psychological symptoms was assessed using reliable change indices. Radiation dosimetry, if prescribed, was evaluated based on treatment-planning computerized tomography co-registered with contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Mixed effects analyses were used to explore whether incidental radiation to brain regions outside the tumor influences neurocognitive and psychological outcomes.

Results

Most (range = 41%-93%) survivors demonstrated stable-albeit often below average-neurocognitive and psychological trajectories, although some also exhibited improvements (range = 0%-31%) or declines (range = 0%-36%) over time. Higher radiation dose to the parietal-occipital region (partial R2 = 0.462) and cerebellum (partial R2 = 0.276) was independently associated with slower visuomotor processing speed. Higher dose to the hippocampi was associated with increases in depression (partial R2 = 0.367) and trait anxiety (partial R2 = 0.236).

Conclusions

Meningioma survivors experience neurocognitive deficits and psychological symptoms many years after diagnosis, and a proportion of them decline over time. This study offers proof of concept that incidental radiation to brain regions beyond the tumor site may contribute to these sequelae. Future investigations should include radiation dosimetry when examining risk factors that contribute to the quality of survivorship in this growing population.

Advancing Beyond the Hippocampus to Preserve Cognition for Patients With Brain Metastases: Dosimetric Results From a Phase 2 Trial of Memory-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Recent advances to preserve neurocognitive function in patients treated for brain metastases include stereotactic radiosurgery, hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and memantine administration. The hippocampus, corpus callosum, fornix, and amygdala are key neurocognitive substructures with a low propensity for brain metastases. Herein, we report our preliminary experience using a "memory-avoidance" WBRT (MA-WBRT) approach that spares these substructures for patients with >15 brain metastases.

Methods and Materials

Ten consecutive patients treated with MA-WBRT on a phase 2 clinical trial were reviewed. In each patient, the hippocampi, amygdalae, corpus callosum, and fornix were contoured. Patients were not eligible for MA-WBRT if they had metastases in these substructures. A memory-avoidance region was created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around these substructures. Hotspots were avoided in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Coverage of brain metastases was prioritized over memory avoidance dose constraints. Dose constraints for these avoidance structures included a D100% ≤ 9 Gy and D0.03 cm3 ≤ 16 Gy (variation acceptable to 20 Gy). LINAC-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions.

Results

On average, the memory avoidance structure volume was 37.1 cm3 (range, 25.2-44.6 cm3), occupying 2.5% of the entire whole brain target volume. All treatment plans met the D100% dose constraint, and 8 of 10 plans met the D0.03 cm3 constraint, with priority given to tumor coverage for the remaining 2 cases. Target coverage (D98% > 25 Gy) and homogeneity (D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy) were achieved for all plans.

Conclusions

Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus, amygdala, corpus callosum, and fornix with good target coverage and homogeneity. After enrollment is completed, quality of life and cognitive data will be evaluated to assess the efficacy of MA-WBRT to mitigate declines in quality of life and cognition after whole brain radiation.

Assessment of Radiation Dosage to the Hippocampi during Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases Using Gamma Knife Therapy

Background and Objectives: Brain metastases (BMs) pose significant clinical challenges in systemic cancer patients. They often cause symptoms related to brain compression and are typically managed with multimodal therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). With modern oncology treatments prolonging survival, concerns about the neurocognitive side effects of BM treatments are growing. WBRT, though widely used for multiple BMs, has recognized neurocognitive toxicity. SRS, particularly Gamma Knife (GK) therapy, offers a minimally invasive alternative with fewer side effects, suitable for patients with a quantifiable number of metastases and better prognoses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients with multiple BMs treated exclusively with GK at an academic medical center. Patients with prior WBRT were excluded. This study focused on the mean radiation dose received by the hippocampal area, estimated according to the 'Hippocampal Contouring: A Contouring Atlas for RTOG 0933' guidelines. Results: The precision of GK equipment results in mean doses of radiation that are lower than those suggested by RTOG 0933 and observed in other studies. This precision may help mitigate cognitive dysfunction and other side effects of hippocampal irradiation. Conclusions: GK therapy facilitates the administration of smaller, safer radiation doses to the hippocampi, which is advantageous even for lesions in the temporal lobe. It is feasible to treat multiple metastases, including cases with more than 10, but it is typically reserved for patients with fewer metastases, with an average of 3 in this study. This underlines GK's potential for reducing adverse effects while managing BMs effectively.

Unilateral hippocampal sparing during whole brain radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases: narrative and critical review

Background

The landscape of brain metastases radiotherapy is evolving, with a shift away from whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) toward targeted stereotactic approaches aimed at preserving neurocognitive functions and maintaining overall quality of life. For patients with multiple metastases, especially in cases where targeted radiotherapy is no longer feasible due to widespread dissemination, the concept of hippocampal sparing radiotherapy (HA_WBRT) gains prominence.

Methods

In this narrative review we explore the role of the hippocampi in memory formation and the implications of their postradiotherapy lateral damage. We also consider the potential advantages of selectively sparing one hippocampus during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Additionally, by systematic evaluation of relevant papers published on PubMed database over last 20 years, we provide a comprehensive overview of the various changes that can occur in the left or right hippocampus as a consequence of radiotherapy.

Results

While it is important to note that various neurocognitive functions are interconnected throughout the brain, we can discern certain specialized roles of the hippocampi. The left hippocampus appears to play a predominant role in verbal memory, whereas the right hippocampus is associated more with visuospatial memory. Additionally, the anterior part of the hippocampus is more involved in episodic memory and emotional processing, while the posterior part is primarily responsible for spatial memory and pattern separation. Notably, a substantial body of evidence demonstrates a significant correlation between post-radiotherapy changes in the left hippocampus and subsequent cognitive decline in patients.

Conclusion

In the context of individualized palliative radiotherapy, sparing the unilateral (specifically, the left, which is dominant in most individuals) hippocampus could expand the repertoire of strategies available for adapted WBRT in cases involving multiple brain metastases where stereotactic radiotherapy is not a viable option. Prospective ongoing studies assessing various memory-sparing radiotherapy techniques will define new standard of radiotherapy care of patients with multiple brain metastases.

Proton Therapy for Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma

PURPOSE

To provide the first report on proton radiotherapy (PRT) in the management of advanced nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) and evaluate potential benefits compared to conformal photon therapy (XRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 10 consecutive patients undergoing PRT for advanced JNA in a definitive or postoperative setting with a relative biological effectiveness weighted dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions between 2012 and 2022 at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons and risk estimations for short- and long-term radiation-induced complications between PRT plans and helical XRT plans were conducted.

RESULTS

PRT was well tolerated, with only low-grade acute toxicities (CTCAE I-II) being reported. The local control rate was 100% after a median follow-up of 27.0 (interquartile range 13.3-58.0) months. PRT resulted in considerable tumor shrinkage, leading to complete remission in five patients and bearing the potential to provide partial or complete symptom relief. Favorable dosimetric outcomes in critical brain substructures by the use of PRT translated into reduced estimated risks for neurocognitive impairment and radiation-induced CNS malignancies compared to XRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PRT is an effective treatment option for advanced JNA with minimal acute morbidity and the potential for reduced radiation-induced long-term complications.

Hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in neurocognitive function.

METHODS

PubMed was queried for studies involving hippocampal-avoidance radiation therapy and results were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed for median overall survival, progression-free survival, hippocampal relapse rates, and neurocognitive function testing.

RESULTS

Of 3709 search results, 19 articles were included and a total of 1611 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 8 retrospective cohort studies. All studies evaluated hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with brain metastases. Hippocampal relapse rates were low (overall effect size = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.05]) and there was no significant difference in risk of relapse between the five studies that compared HA-WBRT/HA-PCI and WBRT/PCI groups (risk difference = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [- 0.02, 0.03]; p = 0.63). 11 out of 19 studies included neurocognitive function testing. Significant differences were reported in overall cognitive function and memory and verbal learning 3-24 months post-RT. Differences in executive function were reported by one study, Brown et al., at 4 months. No studies reported differences in verbal fluency, visual learning, concentration, processing speed, and psychomotor speed at any timepoint.

CONCLUSION

Current studies in HA-WBRT/HA-PCI showed low hippocampal relapse or metastasis rates. Significant differences in neurocognitive testing were most prominent in overall cognitive function, memory, and verbal learning. Studies were hampered by loss to follow-up.

Dosimetric predictors of toxicity in a randomized study of short-course vs conventional radiotherapy for glioblastoma

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on appropriate organ at risk (OAR) constraints for short-course radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma. Using dosimetry and prospectively-collected toxicity data from a trial of short-course radiotherapy for glioblastoma, this study aims to empirically examine the OAR constraints, with particular attention to left hippocampus dosimetry and impact on neuro-cognitive decline.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data was taken from a randomized control trial of 133 adults (age 18-70 years; ECOG performance score 0-2) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with 60 Gy in 30 (conventional arm) versus 20 (short-course arm) fractions of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02206230). The delivered plan's dosimetry to the OARs was correlated to prospective-collected toxicity and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) data.

RESULTS

Toxicity events were not significantly increased in the short-course arm versus the conventional arm. Across all OARs, delivered radiation doses within protocol-allowable maximum doses correlated with lack of grade ≥ 2 toxicities in both arms (p < 0.001), while patients with OAR doses at or above protocol limits correlated with increased grade ≥ 2 toxicities across all examined OARs in both arms (p-values 0.063-0.250). Mean left hippocampus dose was significantly associated with post-radiotherapy decline in MMSE scores (p = 0.005), while the right hippocampus mean dose did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.277). Compared to the original clinical plan, RapidPlan left hippocampus sparing model decreased left hippocampus mean dose by 43 % (p < 0.001), without compromising planning target volume coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, protocol OAR constraints were appropriate for limiting grade ≥ 2 toxicities in conventional and short-course adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma. Higher left hippocampal mean doses were predictive for neuro-cognitive decline post-radiotherapy. Routine contouring and use of dose constraints to limit hippocampal dose is recommended to minimize neuro-cognitive decline in patients with glioblastoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation

BACKGROUND

Cognitive deficits are common in people who have received cranial irradiation and have a serious impact on daily functioning and quality of life. The benefit of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of cognitive deficits in this population is unclear. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions for preventing or ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update we searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and PsycInfo via Ovid to 12 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled (RCTs) trials that evaluated pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in cranial irradiated adults, with objective cognitive functioning as a primary or secondary outcome measure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (MK, JD) independently extracted data from selected studies and carried out a risk of bias assessment. Cognitive function, fatigue and mood outcomes were reported. No data were pooled.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this updated review. Six were from the original version of the review, and two more were added when the search was updated. Nineteen further studies were assessed as part of this update but did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Of the eight included studies, four studies investigated "prevention" of cognitive problems (during radiotherapy and follow-up) and four studies investigated "amelioration" (interventions to treat cognitive impairment as a late complication of radiotherapy). There were five pharmacological studies (two studies on prevention and three in amelioration) and three non-pharmacological studies (two on prevention and one in amelioration). Due to differences between studies in the interventions being evaluated, a meta-analysis was not possible.  Studies in early radiotherapy treatment phase (five studies) Pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" were designed to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deficits and included drugs used in dementia (memantine) and fatigue (d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride). Non-pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" included a ketogenic diet and a two-week cognitive rehabilitation and problem-solving programme.  In the memantine study, the primary cognitive outcome of memory at six months did not reach significance, but there was significant improvement in overall cognitive function compared to placebo, with similar adverse events across groups. The d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride study found no statistically significant difference between arms, with few adverse events. The study of a calorie-restricted ketogenic diet found no effect, although a lower than expected calorie intake in the control group complicates interpretation of the results.  The study investigating the utility of a rehabilitation program did not carry out a statistical comparison of cognitive performance between groups.  Studies in delayed radiation or late effect phase (four studies) The "amelioration" pharmacological studies to treat cognitive complications of radiotherapy included drugs used in dementia (donepezil) or psychostimulants (methylphenidate and modafinil). Non-pharmacological measures included cognitive rehabilitation and problem solving (Goal Management Training). These studies included patients with cognitive problems at entry who had "stable" brain cancer.  The donepezil study did not find an improvement in the primary cognitive outcome of overall cognitive performance, but did find improvement in an individual test of memory, compared to placebo; adverse events were not reported. A study comparing methylphenidate with modafinil found improvements in cognitive function in both the methylphenidate and modafinil arms; few adverse events were reported. Another  study comparing two different doses of modafinil combined treatment arms and found improvements across all cognitive tests, however, a number of adverse events were reported. Both studies were limited by a small sample size. The Goal Management Training study suggested a benefit of the intervention, a behavioural intervention that combined mindfulness and strategy training, on executive function and processing speed.  There were a number of limitations across studies and few were without high risks of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update, limited additional evidence was found for the treatment or amelioration of cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. As concluded in the original review, there is supportive evidence that memantine may help prevent cognitive deficits for adults with brain metastases receiving cranial irradiation. There is supportive evidence that donepezil, methylphenidate and modafinil may have a role in treating cognitive deficits in adults with brain tumours who have been treated with cranial irradiation; patient withdrawal affected the statistical power of these studies. Further research that tries to minimise the withdrawal of consent, and subsequently reduce the requirement for imputation procedures, may offer a higher certainty of evidence. There is evidence from only a single small study to support non-pharmacological interventions in the amelioration of cognitive deficits. Further research is required.

Influences on cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas: A systematic review

People with brain tumors, including those previously treated, are commonly affected by a range of neurocognitive impairments involving executive function, memory, attention, and social/emotional functioning. Several factors are postulated to underlie this relationship, but evidence relating to many of these factors is conflicting and does not fully explain the variation in cognitive outcomes seen in the literature and in clinical practice. To address this, we performed a systematic literature review to identify and describe the range of factors that can influence cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas. A literature search was performed of Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PsycTESTS from commencement until September 2021. Of 9,998 articles identified through the search strategy, and an additional 39 articles identified through other sources, 142 were included in our review. The results confirmed that multiple factors influence cognitive outcomes in patients with gliomas. The effects of tumor characteristics (including location) and treatments administered are some of the most studied variables but the evidence for these is conflicting, which may be the result of methodological and study population differences. Tumor location and laterality overall appear to influence cognitive outcomes, and detection of such an effect is contingent upon administration of appropriate cognitive tests. Surgery appears to have an overall initial deleterious effect on cognition with a recovery in most cases over several months. A large body of evidence supports the adverse effects of radiotherapy on cognition, but the role of chemotherapy is less clear. To contrast, baseline cognitive status appears to be a consistent factor that influences cognitive outcomes, with worse baseline cognition at diagnosis/pre-treatment correlated with worse long-term outcomes. Similarly, much evidence indicates that anti-epileptic drugs have a negative effect on cognition and genetics also appear to have a role. Evidence regarding the effect of age on cognitive outcomes in glioma patients is conflicting, and there is insufficient evidence for gender and fatigue. Cognitive reserve, brain reserve, socioeconomic status, and several other variables discussed in this review, and their influence on cognition and recovery, have not been well-studied in the context of gliomas and are areas for focus in future research.

A review of long-term deficits in memory systems following radiotherapy for pediatric posterior fossa tumor

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, progress in pediatric posterior fossa tumor (PFT) treatments has improved survival rates. However, the majority of survivors present neurocognitive sequelae that impact academic achievement.

METHODS

This review examines the literature from 2000 to 2020 on long-term outcomes in different memory systems for survivors of pediatric PFT, considering the impact of radiotherapy which is a well-known prognostic factor for global neurocognitive function.

RESULTS

Of the 43 articles selected, 31 explored working memory, 19 episodic memory, 9 semantic memory and 2 procedural memory. Irradiated survivors had scores of < -2 standard deviation (SD) (n = 4 studies/25) or between -2SD and -1SD (n =7 studies/25) for working memory; < -1SD for anterograde memory (n = 11/13), with a progressive decline in these two memory systems; < -1SD (n = 4/7) in semantic memory, and a deficit in perceptual-motor procedural learning (n = 1/1). Reducing craniospinal irradiation dose, limiting tumor bed boosts, and using proton therapy seem to have had a beneficial effect with better preservation of the memory score and a reduction in the decline over time. Non-irradiated survivors had memory systems that were less affected, with preservation of anterograde memory and maintenance of long-term stability.

CONCLUSION

Memory deficits are a core feature in survivors of pediatric PFT, especially when treatment requires radiotherapy. To limit these effects, dose constraints for specific brain areas involved in memory should be defined. During long-term follow-up, specific attention is essential to identify these deficits in order to limit their impact on the quality of life.

Prediction Models for Radiation-Induced Neurocognitive Decline in Adult Patients With Primary or Secondary Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Although an increasing body of literature suggests a relationship between brain irradiation and deterioration of neurocognitive function, it remains as the standard therapeutic and prophylactic modality in patients with brain tumors. This review was aimed to abstract and evaluate the prediction models for radiation-induced neurocognitive decline in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors.

Methods

MEDLINE was searched on October 31, 2021 for publications containing relevant truncation and MeSH terms related to “radiotherapy,” “brain,” “prediction model,” and “neurocognitive impairments.” Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool.

Results

Of 3,580 studies reviewed, 23 prediction models were identified. Age, tumor location, education level, baseline neurocognitive score, and radiation dose to the hippocampus were the most common predictors in the models. The Hopkins verbal learning (n = 7) and the trail making tests (n = 4) were the most frequent outcome assessment tools. All studies used regression (n = 14 linear, n = 8 logistic, and n = 4 Cox) as machine learning method. All models were judged to have a high risk of bias mainly due to issues in the analysis.

Conclusion

Existing models have limited quality and are at high risk of bias. Following recommendations are outlined in this review to improve future models: developing cognitive assessment instruments taking into account the peculiar traits of the different brain tumors and radiation modalities; adherence to model development and validation guidelines; careful choice of candidate predictors according to the literature and domain expert consensus; and considering radiation dose to brain substructures as they can provide important information on specific neurocognitive impairments.

Development of explanatory movies for the delineation of new organs at risk in neuro-oncology

•

Accurate and uniform OAR delineation is essential to gather consistent toxicity data.

•

New OARs were introduced in the 2021 update of EPTN Neurological Contouring Atlas.

•

We developed explanatory movies for the delineation of these OARs.

•

This aims to facilitate the training of delineation professionals.

Ten new organs at risk (OARs) were recently introduced in the updated European Particle Therapy Network neurological contouring atlas. Despite the use of the illustrated atlas and descriptive text, interindividual contouring variations may persist. To further facilitate the contouring of these OARs, educational films were developed and published on www.cancerdata.org.

Do neurocognitive impairments explain the differences between brain tumour patients and their proxies when assessing the patient’s IADL?

Background

Neurocognitive impairments are common among brain tumour patients, and may impact patient’s awareness of performance in instrumental activities in daily life (IADL). We examined differences between patient- and proxy-reported assessments of the patient’s IADL, and whether the level of (dis)agreement is associated with neurocognitive impairments.

Methods

Brain tumour patients and their proxies completed the phase 3 version of the EORTC IADL-BN32 questionnaire measuring IADL, and patients completed six neurocognitive measures. Patient-proxy difference scores in IADL were compared between patients who were defined as neurocognitively impaired (≥2 neurocognitive measures ≥2.0 standard deviations below healthy controls) and non-neurocognitively impaired. With multinomial logistic regression analyses we examined if neurocognitive variables were independently associated with patient-proxy disagreement in IADL ratings.

Results

Patients (n=81) did not systematically (p&lt;0.01) rate IADL outcomes different than their proxies. Proxies did report more problems on 19/32 individual items and all five scales. This effect was more apparent in dyads with a neurocognitively impaired patient (n=37), compared to dyads with non-neurocognitively impaired patients (n=44). Multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that several neurocognitive variables (e.g., cognitive flexibility and verbal fluency) were independently associated with disagreement between patients and proxies on different scales.

Conclusion

Neurocognitive deficits seem to play a role in the discrepancies between brain tumour patients and their proxies assessment of patient’s level of IADL . Although replication of our results is needed, our findings suggests that caution is warranted in interpreting self-reported IADL by patients with neurocognitive impairment, and that such self-reports should be supplemented with proxy ratings.

Radiation dose to circumscribed brain regions and neurocognitive function in patients with meningioma

Background

Although radiation (RT) is standard treatment for many brain tumors, it may contribute to neurocognitive decline. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between RT dose to circumscribed brain regions and specific neurocognitive domains in patients with meningioma.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective study of 40 patients with meningioma who received RT and underwent an in-depth clinical neurocognitive assessment. Radiation dosimetry characteristics were delineated based on treatment planning computerized tomography co-registered with contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Principal components analysis was applied to organize neurocognitive test scores into factors, and multivariate multiple linear regression models were undertaken to examine if RT dose to circumscribed brain regions is associated with specific neurocognitive outcomes.

Results

Radiation dose to brain regions was associated with neurocognitive functions across a number of domains. High dose to the parietal-occipital region was associated with slower visuomotor processing speed (mean dose, β = -1.100, P = .017; dose to 50% of the region [D50], β = -0.697, P = .049). In contrast, high dose to the dorsal frontal region was associated with faster visuomotor processing speed (mean dose, β = 0.001, P = .036).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that RT delivered to brain regions (ie, parietal-occipital areas) may contribute to poor neurocognitive outcomes. Given that modern radiotherapy techniques allow for precise targeting of dose delivered to brain regions, prospective trials examining relations between dose and neurocognitive functions are warranted to confirm these preliminary results.

A prospective behavioral and imaging study exploring the impact on long-term memory of radiotherapy delivered for a brain tumor in childhood and adolescence

•

Common long-term memory defects after pediatric brain tumor affect school achievement

•

The hippocampi, the cerebellum and cerebellar-cortical networks play a role in several memory systems.

•

This study will provide long-term neuropsychological data about four different memory systems.

•

We will investigate the correlations between neuropsychological, neuroimaging and radiotherapy dose data.

•

Imaging will be structural (3DT1), microstructural (DTI), functional (rs-fMRI), vascular (ASL) and metabolic (spectroscopy).

Background

Posterior fossa tumors represent two thirds of brain tumors in children. Although progress in treatment has improved survival rates over the past few years, long-term memory impairments in survivors are frequent and have an impact on academic achievement. The hippocampi, cerebellum and cerebellar-cortical networks play a role in several memory systems. They are affected not only by the location of the tumor itself and its surgical removal, but also by the supratentorial effects of complementary treatments, particularly radiotherapy. The IMPALA study will investigate the impact of irradiation doses on brain structures involved in memory, especially the hippocampi and cerebellum.

Methods/design

In this single-center prospective behavioral and neuro-imaging study, 90 participants will be enrolled in three groups. The first two groups will include patients who underwent surgery for a posterior fossa brain tumor in childhood, who are considered to be cured, and who completed treatment at least 5 years earlier, either with radiotherapy (aggressive brain tumor; Group 1) or without (low-grade brain tumor; Group 2). Group 3 will include control participants matched with Group 1 for age, sex, and handedness. All participants will perform an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests, including an assessment of the main memory systems, and undergo multimodal 3 T MRI. The irradiation dose to the different brain structures involved in memory will be collected from the initial radiotherapy dosimetry.

Discussion

This study will provide long-term neuropsychological data about four different memory systems (working memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, and procedural memory) and the cognitive functions (attention, language, executive functions) that can interfere with them, in order to better characterize memory deficits among the survivors of brain tumors. We will investigate the correlations between neuropsychological and neuroimaging data on the structural (3DT1), microstructural (DTI), functional (rs-fMRI), vascular (ASL) and metabolic (spectroscopy) impact of the tumor and irradiation dose. This study will thus inform the setting of dose constraints to spare regions linked to the development of cognitive and memory functions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04324450, registered March 27, 2020, updated January 25th, 2021. Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324450.

Optimization of brain tumours irradiation determining the set-up margin

The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the excising margin of the clinical tumor volume and planning target volume correspond with calculated radiation margin based on systematic errors, and definition of radiation margins of individual brain lobes. This research was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We checked the systematic errors and calculated their average and the size of radiation margins. The average systematic errors were calculated in four directions: lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and rotation. The largest average systematic error was calculated in the lateral direction in the cerebellar area, and the error was also statistically significant(p < 0.05). In rotational direction we notice the statistically significant difference in frontal lopbe (p = 0.037), and cerebellar area (p = 0.002). The largest safety margin, as measured by the apverage systematic errors, is requirped for irradiation of the cerebellum. The safety margin size of 6.94 mm was calculated according to the formula of Van Herk. However, the smallest safety margin can be used for irradiation of the occipital lobe of the brain, namely 4.85 mm. The linear regression results that only cerebellar lesions affect lateral displacements. Based on our calculation of the mean systematic errors, we estimate that the clinical target volume - planning target volume safety margin can't be reduced further from the current 5 mm to a size of 3 mm without the use of image guided radiotherapy.

Treatment plan comparison of proton vs photon radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas

Background and purpose

Patients with lower-grade gliomas are long-term survivors after radiotherapy and may benefit from the reduced dose to normal tissue achievable with proton therapy. Here, we aimed to quantify differences in dose to the uninvolved brain and contralateral hippocampus and compare the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for photon and proton plans for lower-grade glioma patients.

Materials and methods

Twenty-three patients were included in this in-silico planning comparative study and had photon and proton plans calculated (50.4 Gy(RBE = 1.1), 28 Fx) applying similar dose constraints to the target and organs at risk. Automatically calculated photon plans were generated with a 3 mm margin from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume. Manual proton plans were generated using robust optimisation on the CTV. Dose metrics of organs at risk were compared using population mean dose-volume histograms and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Secondary cancer risk per 10,000 persons per year (PPY) was estimated using dose-volume data and a risk model for secondary cancer induction.

Results

CTV coverage (V95%>98%) was similar for the two treatment modalities. Mean dose (D_mean) to the uninvolved brain was significantly reduced from 21.5 Gy (median, IQR 17.1–24.4 Gy) with photons compared to 10.3 Gy(RBE) (8.1–13.9 Gy(RBE)) with protons. D_mean to the contralateral hippocampus was significantly reduced from 6.5 Gy (5.4–11.7 Gy) with photons to 1.5 Gy(RBE) (0.4–6.8 Gy(RBE)) with protons. The estimated secondary cancer risk was reduced from 6.7 PPY (median, range 3.3–10.4 PPY) with photons to 3.0 PPY (1.3–7.5 PPY) with protons.

Conclusion

A significant reduction in mean dose to uninvolved brain and contralateral hippocampus was found with proton planning. The estimated secondary cancer risk was reduced with proton therapy.

Long-Term Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Hippocampus: Linking Effects of the Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Activation with Radiation Response

Radiation therapy represents one of the primary treatment modalities for primary and metastatic brain tumors. Although recent advances in radiation techniques, that allow the delivery of higher radiation doses to the target volume, reduce the toxicity to normal tissues, long-term neurocognitive decline is still a detrimental factor significantly affecting quality of life, particularly in pediatric patients. This imposes the need for the development of prevention strategies. Based on recent evidence, showing that manipulation of the Shh pathway carries therapeutic potential for brain repair and functional recovery after injury, here we evaluate how radiation-induced hippocampal alterations are modulated by the constitutive activation of the Shh signaling pathway in Patched 1 heterozygous mice (Ptch1^+/-). Our results show, for the first time, an overall protective effect of constitutive Shh pathway activation on hippocampal radiation injury. This activation, through modulation of the proneural gene network, leads to a long-term reduction of hippocampal deficits in the stem cell and new neuron compartments and to the mitigation of radio-induced astrogliosis, despite some behavioral alterations still being detected in Ptch1^+/- mice. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the neural decline following irradiation is essential for identifying prevention measures to contain the harmful consequences of irradiation. Our data have important translational implications as they suggest a role for Shh pathway manipulation to provide the therapeutic possibility of improving brain repair and functional recovery after radio-induced injury.

Lycium barbarum polysaccharide attenuates emotional injury of offspring elicited by prenatal chronic stress in rats via regulation of gut microbiota

Stress during pregnancy is not only detrimental to a woman's own physical and mental health, but can also cause changes in the intrauterine environment and even have an impact on later growth and development, this study was designed to understand the changes of gut microbiota in the maternal and offspring caused by prenatal chronic stress, and to explore the regulatory effect of LBP on gut microbiota, and then to improve the emotional damage caused by prenatal chronic stress in the offspring. A rat model of prenatal chronic stress was made and used LBP to intervene by gavage. Fresh feces of offspring were collected, the concentration of microbial metabolites were tested by ELISA. Illumina MiSeqPE300 sequencing technology was used to determine the sequence of 16S rRNA V3-V4 of microorganisms. On the PND 42, the emotional function of offspring were tested by open-field test (OFT), sucrose preference test (SPT) and tail of suspend test (TST). Results indicated that stress factors increased the plasma corticosterone level of rats during pregnancy and they appeared depressive behaviors. The body weight of offspring during prenatal chronic stress was lower than the control group, and the plasma corticosterone level was increased. Prenatal chronic stress had a significant impact on emotional performance of the offspring on OFT, SPT and TST. Alpha diversity of gut microbiota and microbiota composition in offspring of prenatal chronic stress was attenuated and some relationships existed between these parameters. LBP treatment reduced offspring's plasma corticosterone level and improved their body weight, changed the emotional function, increased the diversity of gut microbiota. Collectively, these findings disclose that prenatal chronic stress not only causes emotional injury on the offspring, but also changes the gut microbiota of the mother and offspring; LBP may regulate the intestinal flora of the mother, then reducing the influence of stress factors on the emotional injury of offspring.

Associations between patient-reported outcomes and radiation dose in patients treated with radiation therapy for primary brain tumours

•

Higher radiation doses to the brain may negatively affect quality of life.

•

Higher radiation doses to the brain may negatively affect patient-reported cognition.

•

Patients with fatigue had received higher dose to certain areas in the brain.

Aim

This study aimed to explore associations between radiation dose and patient-reported outcomes in patients with a primary non-glioblastoma brain tumour treated with radiation therapy (RT), with a focus on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and self-reported cognitive function.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 78 patients who had received RT for a non-glioblastoma primary brain tumour, underwent neuropsychological testing and completed questionnaires on HRQoL, cognitive function, fatigue, depression, anxiety and perceived stress. The study explores the association between HRQoL scores, self-reported cognitive function and radiation doses to total brain, brainstem, hippocampus, thalamus, temporal lobes and frontal lobes. In addition, we examined correlations between neuropsychological test scores and self-reported cognitive function.

Results

The median time between RT and testing was 4.6 years (range 1–9 years). Patients who had received high mean radiation doses to the total brain had low HRQoL scores (Cohen’s d = 0.50, p = 0.04), brainstem (d = 0.65, p = 0.01) and hippocampus (d = 0.66, p = 0.01). High mean doses to the total brain were also associated with low scores on self-reported cognitive functioning (Cohen’s d = 0.64, p = 0.02), brainstem (d = 0.55, p = 0.03), hippocampus (d = 0.76, p < 0.01), temporal lobes (d = 0.70, p < 0.01) and thalamus (d = 0.64, p = 0.01). Self-reported cognitive function correlated well with neuropsychological test scores (correlation range 0.27–0.54.)

Conclusions

High radiation doses to specific brain structures may be associated with impaired HRQoL and self-reported cognitive function with potentially negative implications to patients’ daily lives. Patient-reported outcomes of treatment-related side-effects and their associations with radiation doses to the brain and its sub-structures may provide important information on radiation tolerance to the brain and sub-structures.

Role of hippocampal location and radiation dose in glioblastoma patients with hippocampal atrophy

BACKGROUND

The hippocampus is a critical organ for irradiation. Thus, we explored changes in hippocampal volume according to the dose delivered and the location relative to the glioblastoma.

METHODS

All patients were treated for glioblastoma with surgery, concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and adjuvant temozolomide. Hippocampi were retrospectively delineated on three MRIs, performed at baseline, at the time of relapse, and on the last MRI available at the end of follow-up. A total of 98, 96, and 82 hippocampi were measured in the 49 patients included in the study, respectively. The patients were stratified into three subgroups according to the dose delivered to 40% of the hippocampus. In the group 1 (n = 6), the hippocampal D_40% was < 7.4 Gy, in the group 2 (n = 13), only the H_contra D_40% was < 7.4 Gy, and in the group 3 (n = 30), the D_40% for both hippocampi was > 7.4 Gy.

RESULTS

Regardless of the time of measurement, homolateral hippocampal volumes were significantly lower than those contralateral to the tumor. Regardless of the side, the volumes at the last MRI were significantly lower than those measured at baseline. There was a significant correlation among the decrease in hippocampal volume regardless of its side, and D_max (p = 0.001), D_98% (p = 0.028) and D_40% (p = 0.0002). After adjustment for the time of MRI, these correlations remained significant. According to the D_40% and volume at MRI_last, the hippocampi decreased by 4 mm³/Gy overall.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant relationship between the radiotherapy dose and decrease in hippocampal volume. However, at the lowest doses, the hippocampi seem to exhibit an adaptive increase in their volume, which could indicate a plasticity effect. Consequently, shielding at least one hippocampus by delivering the lowest possible dose is recommended so that cognitive function can be preserved. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Update of the EPTN atlas for CT- and MR-based contouring in Neuro-Oncology

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To update the digital online atlas for organs at risk (OARs) delineation in neuro-oncology based on high-quality computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with new OARs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this planned update of the neurological contouring atlas published in 2018, ten new clinically relevant OARs were included, after thorough discussion between experienced neuro-radiation oncologists (RTOs) representing 30 European radiotherapy-oncology institutes. Inclusion was based on daily practice and research requirements. Consensus was reached for the delineation after critical review. Contouring was performed on registered CT with intravenous (IV) contrast (soft tissue & bone window setting) and 3 Tesla (T) MRI (T1 with gadolinium & T2 FLAIR) images of one patient (1 mm slices). For illustration purposes, delineation on a 7 T MRI without IV contrast from a healthy volunteer was added. OARs were delineated by three experienced RTOs and a neuroradiologist based on the relevant literature.

RESULTS

The presented update of the neurological contouring atlas was reviewed and approved by 28 experts in the field. The atlas is available online and includes in total 25 OARs relevant to neuro-oncology, contoured on CT and MRI T1 and FLAIR (3 T & 7 T). Three-dimensional (3D) rendered films are also available online.

CONCLUSION

In order to further decrease inter- and intra-observer OAR delineation variability in the field of neuro-oncology, we propose the use of this contouring atlas in photon and particle therapy, in clinical practice and in the research setting. The updated atlas is freely available on www.cancerdata.org.