Clinical outcomes, local-regional control and the role for metastasis-directed therapies in stage III non-small cell lung cancers treated with chemoradiation and durvalumab

Pneumonitis Risk After Chemoradiotherapy With and Without Immunotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to determine whether the addition of ICIs to CRT is associated with an increased risk of pneumonitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for eligible studies published between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2023. The outcome of interest was the incidence rate of pneumonitis. A random-effects model was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 185 studies with 24,527 patients were included. The pooled rate of grade ≥2 pneumonitis for CRT plus ICIs was significantly higher than that for CRT alone (29.6%; 95% CI, 25.7%-33.6% vs 20.2%; 95% CI, 17.7%-22.8%; P < .0001) but not that of grade ≥3 (5.7%; 95% CI, 4.8%-6.6% vs 5.6%; 95% CI, 4.7%-6.5%; P = .64) or grade 5 (0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2% vs 0.3%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%; P = .68). The results from the subgroup analyses of prospective studies, retrospective studies, Asian and non-Asian studies, concurrent CRT (cCRT), and durvalumab consolidation were comparable to the overall results. However, CRT or cCRT plus PD-1 inhibitors not only significantly increased the incidence of grade ≥2 but also that of grade ≥3 pneumonitis compared to CRT alone or cCRT plus PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CRT alone, durvalumab consolidation after CRT appears to be associated with a higher incidence of moderate pneumonitis and CRT plus PD-1 inhibitors with an increased risk of severe pneumonitis. Nevertheless, these findings are based on observational studies and need to be validated in future large head-to-head studies.

First-site-metastasis pattern in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune check-point inhibition: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI).

METHODS

We defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

RESULTS

136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with ≥ 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001). Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016). For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV ≥ 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 ≥ 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027). After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 ≥ 30 and GTV ≥ 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not.

Efficacy of consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitor after chemoradiation for unresectable, locally advanced PD‑L1 negative non‑small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as durvalumab or pembrolizumab, for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor PD-L1 expression <1% remains a topic of controversy. Previous studies from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for a meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies were included in part one of the meta-analysis and it was observed that consolidation of ICIs after CRT improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; P=0.005] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.26; P=0.023) for the patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%. Then, 15 studies were included in part two of the meta-analysis and the results indicated that the pooled 1, 2 and 3-year OS were 77% vs. 83% (P=0.07), 55% vs. 59% (P=0.327) and 38% vs. 51% (P=0.006) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The pooled 1, 2 and 3-year PFS were 51% vs. 53% (P=0.632), 29% vs. 40% (P=0.015) and 20% vs. 28% (P=0.153) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The findings of the present study highlighted that the benefits of CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs were higher compared with CRT alone in patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%. Consolidation of ICIs after CRT would provide greater benefits for locally advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%.

Chemoradiotherapy versus surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC: a real-world multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a real-world multicenter retrospective study on patients with stage III NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between October 2018 and December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine potential prognostic factors. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to further minimize confounding.

RESULTS

A total of 239 eligible patients were enrolled, with 104 (43.5%) receiving surgery and 135 (56.5%) receiving CRT. After 1:1 PSM, 1- and 2-year PFS rates in patients receiving radical surgery (rSurgery group) vs. patients receiving definitive cCRT (dCCRT group) were 80.0% vs. 79.2% and 67.2% vs. 53.1%, respectively (P = 0.774). One- and 2-year OS rates were 97.5% vs. 97.4% and 87.3% vs. 89.9%, respectively (P = 0.558). Patients in the dCCRT group had a numerically lower incidence of distant metastases compared to those in the rSurgery group (42.9% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.119). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups, except that the incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was significantly higher in the dCCRT group (30.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy may achieve noninferior outcomes to radical surgery in stage III NSCLC.

Patterns of Failure, Low-Volume Relapse, and Subsequent Ablative Management in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation and Consolidation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of failure, frequency of low-volume relapse (LVR), and candidacy for ablative therapy at time of disease progression (PD) after chemoradiation and consolidative immunotherapy (CRT + ICI) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 229 consecutive patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with CRT + ICI between October 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution. PD was classified as isolated locoregional failure (LRF), isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF. Any LRF was subclassified as in-field failure, marginal failure, or out-of-field failure. LVR was defined as 3 or fewer sites of PD in any number of organs. Ablative candidates were defined as having 5 or fewer sites of PD radiographically amenable to high-dose radiation or surgery. Time-to-event data were calculated using cumulative incidence analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to examine the correlations between characteristics of relapse and postprogression survival.

RESULTS

Of the 229 patients, 119 (52%) had PD. Of these 119 patients, 20 (21%) had isolated LRF, 28 (24%) had synchronous LRF + DF, and 71 (60%) had isolated DF. Of the 48 patients with any LRF, 28 (58%) had in-field failure, 10 (21%) marginal failure, and 10 (21%) out-of-field failure. The cumulative incidence of LRF and DF was 13% (95% CI, 9.2%-18%) and 32% (95% CI, 26%-38%) at 1 year and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%) and 39% (95% CI, 33%-46%) at 2 years, respectively. Overall, 64 patients (54%) were considered to have LVR. At time of PD, 60 patients (50%) were eligible for ablative therapy. Patients with LVR had longer median survival versus with high-volume relapse (37.4 vs 15.2 months, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, LVR (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.56; P < .001) was associated with improved postprogression survival.

CONCLUSIONS

After CRT + ICI, approximately half of patients experience LVR at time of PD and are candidates for ablative therapies. Prospective trials are needed to validate the optimal treatment strategy for LVR.

Survival outcomes of targeted and immune consolidation therapies in locally advanced unresectable lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) presents unique challenges due to its progression and tumor heterogeneity. The effectiveness of consolidation therapies, particularly in patients with gene mutations, remains an area of active investigation.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined data from 3,454 patients with unresectable lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), narrowing our focus to 242 individuals with stage II/III. We gathered patient data, such as demographics, ECOG status, histology, treatment specifics, and gene expression, from patients in China. The study's primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while progression-free survival (PFS) served as the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

In this study, 50 % of the 242 patients underwent only radical chemoradiotherapy, with 45.87 % (111/242) exhibiting driver gene mutations, predominantly EGFR (58.57 %), followed by KRAS and ALK. Patients with mutations who received either targeted or immune consolidation therapy demonstrated a significantly longer median PFS (42.97 months vs. 24.87 months, p = 0.014) and improved OS (not reached vs. 24.37 months, p = 0.006), compared to those without consolidation therapy. Targeted therapy in mutant patients resulted in an extended median PFS (42.87 months) compared to immune therapy (27.03 months, p = 0.029), with no significant difference in OS. Median PFS and OS were similar between mutant and wild-type patients receiving immune therapy (p = 0.380 and p = 0.928, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the efficacy of targeted consolidation therapy in enhancing PFS in LUAD patients with genetic mutations. It also shows that immune consolidation therapy provides similar survival benefits to mutant and wild-type patients. Future research should focus on optimizing these therapies for improved patient outcomes.

Real world efficacy and toxicity of consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy in older Australian patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Consolidation durvalumab following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the PACIFIC trial. However, older patients were underrepresented in PACIFIC, and subsequent analyses suggested trends toward poorer survival and increased toxicity in patients aged ≥70 years old. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of consolidation durvalumab following CRT in older Australian patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted across seven sites in Sydney, Australia between January 2018 and September 2021. All adult patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received platinum-based chemoradiotherapy followed by at least one cycle of consolidation durvalumab were included. Older patients were defined as being ≥70 years old.

RESULTS

Of 152 patients included in the analysis, 42.8% (n = 67) patients were 70 years or older. Median follow-up was 26.1 months. The two-year overall survival and median PFS was similar between older and younger patients. At two years, 74.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.4-84.2%) of patients <70 years old and 65.2% (95% CI: 53.4-77.0%) of older patients were alive (p = 0.07; hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% CI: 0.95-2.81). Median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients <70 years was 30.3 months (95% CI: 22.2-38.4 months) compared with 26.7 months (95% CI: 12.8-40.6 months) in older patients (p = 0.22; HR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.80-2.65). Toxicity was also similar, with 11.5% of patients <70 years old and 18.5% of older patients experiencing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs; p = 0.23); 16.1% and 24.6% of the patients, respectively, discontinued treatment due to toxicity (p = 0.19). Grade 3-4 AEs and treatment discontinuation were associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index >5 (p = 0.011) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis at presentation (p = 0.002), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Older Australian patients receiving consolidation durvalumab following CRT experienced comparable outcomes to their younger peers. Comorbidity burden may be more important determinants of treatment tolerance than chronological age.

Effect of Sequence of Radiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy on the Incidence of Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the widespread application of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of lung cancer, increasing attention has been paid to treatment-related pneumonitis. The effect of the treatment sequence on the incidence of pneumonitis remains unclear.

METHODS

We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, meeting abstracts, and reference lists of relevant review articles for literature published on radio- and immunotherapy in lung cancer. Stata software (version 16.0) was used for meta-analysis. Data on the incidence of any grade and ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis was pooled using the random effects model. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used for arm-based pairwise comparisons. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify the potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria. The network meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the incidence of pneumonitis in concurrent ICI with RT (concurrent arm) and RT followed by ICI (RT-first arm) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-4.81). In the meta-analysis of single group rates, RT following ICI (ICI-first arm) exhibited higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis compared with concurrent- and RT-first arms, with 0.321 (95% CI: 0.260-0.386) for programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors from clinical trials, and 0.480 (95% CI: 0.363-0.598) for PD-1 inhibitors from real-world retrospective data, respectively.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in the incidence of any grade and grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis was found between RT-first and concurrent arms. The ICI-first arm exhibited a higher incidence of pneumonitis, which needs to be further confirmed by follow-up studies.

The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents most lung cancer cases, and approximately one-third of patients present with stage III disease at diagnosis. As multiple treatment plans can be adopted for these patients depending on tumor size and nodal staging, stage III NSCLC management is challenging. Over the past decades, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have been implemented in healthcare services to coordinate actions among the different health care professionals involved in cancer care. The aim of this review was to discuss real-world evidence of the impact of MDTs on stage III NSCLC management, survival, and quality of life. Here, we performed a literature review to investigate the role of nutrition and navigational nursing in NSCLC care and the influence of MDTs in the choice of treatment plans, including immunotherapy consolidation, and in the management of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-related adverse events. We also performed a mapping review to identify gaps in the implementation of cancer care MDTs in healthcare services around the world.

Comparison of post-chemoradiotherapy pneumonitis between Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pneumonitis is a common complication for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). It remains unclear whether there is ethnic difference in the incidence of post-CRT pneumonitis.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2023. The outcomes of interest were incidence rates of pneumonitis. The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis. This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023416490).

Findings

A total of 248 studies involving 28,267 patients were included. Among studies of CRT without immunotherapy, the pooled rates of pneumonitis for Asian patients were significantly higher than that for non-Asian patients (all grade: 66.8%, 95% CI: 59.2%-73.9% vs. 28.1%, 95% CI: 20.4%-36.4%; P < 0.0001; grade ≥2: 25.1%, 95% CI: 22.9%-27.3% vs. 14.9%, 95% CI: 12.0%-18.0%; P < 0.0001; grade ≥3: 6.5%, 95% CI: 5.6%-7.3% vs. 4.6%, 95% CI: 3.4%-5.9%; P = 0.015; grade 5: 0.6%, 95% CI: 0.3%-0.9% vs. 0.1%, 95% CI: 0.0%-0.2%; P < 0.0001). Regarding studies of CRT plus immunotherapy, Asian patients had higher rates of all-grade (74.8%, 95% CI: 63.7%-84.5% vs. 34.3%, 95% CI: 28.7%-40.2%; P < 0.0001) and grade ≥2 (34.0%, 95% CI: 30.7%-37.3% vs. 24.6%, 95% CI: 19.9%-29.3%; P = 0.001) pneumonitis than non-Asian patients, but with no significant differences in the rates of grade ≥3 and grade 5 pneumonitis. Results from subgroup analyses were generally similar to that from the all studies. In addition, the pooled median/mean of lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy and mean lung dose were relatively low in Asian studies compared to that in non-Asian studies.

Interpretation

Asian patients are likely to have a higher incidence of pneumonitis than non-Asian patients, which appears to be due to the poor tolerance of lung to radiation. Nevertheless, these findings are based on observational studies and with significant heterogeneity, and need to be validated in future large prospective studies focusing on the subject.

Funding

None.

Durvalumab Treatment Patterns for Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): A Nationwide, Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab is approved for the treatment of adults with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This real-world study describes patient characteristics and durvalumab treatment patterns (number of doses and therapy duration; treatment initiation delays, interruptions, discontinuations, and associated reasons) among VHA-treated patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with unresectable stage III NSCLC receiving durvalumab at the VHA between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2020. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were presented descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 935 patients were included (median age: 69 years; 95% males; 21% Blacks; 46% current smokers; 16% ECOG performance scores ≥ 2; 50% squamous histology). Durvalumab initiation was delayed in 39% of patients (n = 367). Among the 200 patients with recorded reasons, delays were mainly due to physician preference (20%) and CRT toxicity (11%). Overall, patients received a median (interquartile range) of 16 (7-24) doses of durvalumab over 9.0 (2.9-11.8) months. Treatment interruptions were experienced by 19% of patients (n = 180), with toxicity (7.8%) and social reasons (2.6%) being the most cited reasons. Early discontinuation occurred in 59% of patients (n = 551), largely due to disease progression (24.2%) and toxicity (18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world analyses corroborate PACIFIC study results in terms of the main reasons for treatment discontinuation in a VHA population with worse prognostic factors, including older age, predominantly male sex, and poorer performance score. One of the main reasons for durvalumab initiation delays, treatment interruptions, or discontinuations was due to toxicities. Patients could benefit from improved strategies to prevent, identify, and manage CRT and durvalumab toxicities timely and effectively.

Unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: could durvalumab be safe and effective in real-life clinical scenarios? Results of a single-center experience

Introduction

The standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab as shown in the PACIFIC trial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities regarding the use of durvalumab in a real clinical scenario.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of unresectable stage III NSCLC who underwent radical CRT followed or not by durvalumab. Tumor response after CRT, pattern of relapse, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile were investigated.

Results

Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 67 years (range 45-82 years). Fifty-two patients (61.2%) started sequential therapy with durvalumab. The main reason for excluding patients from the durvalumab treatment was the expression of PD-L1 < 1%. Only two patients presented a grade 4 or 5 pneumonitis. A median follow-up (FU) of 20 months has been reached. Forty-five patients (52.9%) had disease progression, and 21 (24.7%) had a distant progression. The addition of maintenance immunotherapy confirmed a clinical benefit in terms of OS and PFS. Two-year OS and PFS were respectively 69.4% and 54.4% in the durvalumab group and 47.9% and 24.2% in the no-durvalumab group (p = 0.015, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

In this real-world study, patients treated with CRT plus durvalumab showed clinical outcomes and toxicities similar to the PACIFIC results. Maintenance immunotherapy after CRT has been shown to be safe and has increased the survival of patients in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiation therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of real-world studies

Background: The current review aimed to pool real-world evidence on the efficacy and toxicity of consolidation durvalumab for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after curative chemoradiotherapy. Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for observational studies reporting the use of durvalumab for NSCLC till 12th April 2022. Twenty-three studies with 4,400 patients were included. Results: The pooled 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates (PFS) were 85% (95% CI: 81%-89%) and 60% (95% CI: 56%-64%) respectively. Pooled incidence of all-grade pneumonitis, grade ≥3 pneumonitis and discontinuation of durvalumab due to pneumonitis were 27% (95% CI: 19%-36%), 8% (95% CI: 6%-10%) and 17% (95% CI: 12%-23%) respectively. The pooled proportion of patients experiencing endocrine, cutaneous, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal adverse events was 11% (95% CI: 7%-18%), 8% (95% CI: 3%-17%), 5% (95% CI: 3%-6%), and 6% (95% CI: 3%-12%), respectively. Conclusion: Meta-regression indicated that performance status significantly influenced PFS, while age, time to durvalumab, and programmed death-ligand 1 status significantly affected pneumonitis rates. Real-world evidence suggests that the short-term efficacy and safety of durvalumab are consistent with that of the PACIFIC trial. The congruence of results lends support to durvalumab use in improving outcomes of unresectable stage III NSCLC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022324663, identifier CRD42022324663.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

In unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard of care for most fit patients is concurrent chemotherapy with normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT), followed by durvalumab consolidation. Nevertheless, almost half of patients will present locoregional or metastatic intrathoracic relapse. Improving locoregional control thus remains an important objective. For this purpose, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be a relevant treatment modality. We performed a systematic review of the literature that evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT in this situation, either instead of or in addition to NFRT. Among 1788 unique reports, 18 met the inclusion criteria. They included 447 patients and were mainly prospective (n = 10, including 5 phase 2 trials). In none, maintenance durvalumab was administered. Most reported SBRT boost after NFRT (n = 8), or definitive tumor and nodal SBRT (n = 7). Median OS varied from 10 to 52 months, due to the heterogeneity of the included populations and according to treatment regimen. The rate of severe side effects was low, with <5 % grade 5 toxicity, and mainly observed when mediastinal SBRT was performed without dose constraints to the proximal bronchovascular tree. It was suggested that a biologically effective dose higher than 112.3 Gy may increase locoregional control. SBRT for selected stage III NSCLC bears potential to improve loco-regional tumor control, but at present, this should only be done in prospective clinical trials.

Five years after PACIFIC: Update on multimodal treatment efficacy based on real-world reports

INTRODUCTION

The growing body of real-life data on maintenance treatment with durvalumab suggests that immunological markers of the cancer-host interplay may have significant effects on the efficacy of multimodal therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize real-world clinical data regarding this new tri-modal approach and report on potential biomarker landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

The obvious question posed in this context of a very heterogeneous inoperable stage III NSCLC disease is: How can we augment an ability to predict checkpoint inhibition success or failure? Which tools and biomarkers, which clinical metadata and genetic background are relevant and feasible? No single biomarker will ever fully dominate the unresectable stage III NSCLC space, so we advocate multilevel and multivariate analysis of biomarkers. In this particular opinion piece, we explore the impact of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR and STK11 mutational status, interferon-gamma signature, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes among others.

Immunotherapy progress and clinical strategy of unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer negative for actionable molecular markers entered the splendid era of immunotherapy. This review aims to provide an evidence-based summary for immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, and references for clinical strategies of immunotherapy. Through literature review, the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer should be radical concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy. However, the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has not been improved, and its safety should be further validated. It is believed that induction immunotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy plus consolidation immunotherapy is promising. In clinical practice, the delineation of radiotherapy target should be relatively small. Pemetrexed combined with PD-1 inhibitor induces the strongest immunogenicity in chemotherapy, which is suggested by preclinical pathway study. Although there is no significant difference between PD1 and PD1 for effect, PD-L1 inhibitor is better in the combination treatment of radiotherapy which presents significantly less adverse events.

Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden, Progression-Free Survival, and Local-Regional Control in Patents with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Durvalumab

IMPORTANCE

The addition of consolidative durvalumab to chemoradiation has improved disease control and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains a need to identify biomarkers for response to this therapy to allow for risk adaptation and personalization.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether TMB or other variants associated with radiation response are also associated with outcomes following definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab among patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included consecutive patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab between November 2013 and March 2020 who had prospective comprehensive genomic profiling. This study was completed at a multisite tertiary cancer center. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 26 (21-36) months. Statistical analysis was conducted from April to October 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patients were grouped into TMB-high (≥10 mutations/megabase [mt/Mb]) and TMB-low (<10 mt/Mb) groups and were additionally evaluated by the presence of somatic alterations associated with radiation resistance (KEAP1/NFE2L2) or radiation sensitivity (DNA damage repair pathway).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were 24-month local-regional failure (LRF) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In this cohort study of 81 patients (46 [57%] male patients; median [range] age, 67 [45-85] years), 36 patients (44%) had TMB-high tumors (≥10 mt/Mb). Patients with TMB-high vs TMB-low tumors had markedly lower 24-month LRF (9% [95% CI, 0%-46%] vs 51% [95% CI, 36%-71%]; P = .001) and improved 24-month PFS (66% [95% CI, 54%-84%] vs 27% [95% CI, 13%-40%]; P = .003). The 24-month LRF was 52% (95% CI, 25%-84%) among patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2-altered tumors compared with 27% (95% CI, 17%-42%) among patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2-wildtype tumors (P = .05). On Cox analysis, only TMB status was associated with LRF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.64; P = .02) and PFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90; P = .03). Histology, disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, and pathogenic KEAP1/NFE2L2, KRAS, and DNA damage repair pathway alterations were not significantly associated with LRF or PFS.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, TMB-high status was associated with improved local-regional control and PFS after definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab. TMB status may facilitate risk-adaptive radiation strategies in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.

Pattern of failure and clinical value of local therapy for oligo‐recurrence in locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer after definitive chemoradiation: Impact of driver mutation status

INTRODUCTION

Considerable differences of treatment response and pattern of failure may exist between definitive chemoradiation (CRT) treated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients. The clinical value of additional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) before disease recurrence and salvage local therapy after initial recurrent disease remain controversial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Consecutive LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive CRT and having definite results about driver mutations (EGFR, ALK and ROS1) were retrospectively reviewed. Initial recurrent disease was classified as in-field recurrence, out-of-field recurrence and distant metastasis. Recurrent disease occurred only in the brain or limited to ≤3 extra-cranial organs and ≤5 extra-cranial lesions, was defined as oligo-recurrence. Progression free survival and overall survival (OS) were calculated from diagnosis to disease progression or death, and to death, respectively. OS2 was measured from initial disease recurrence to death among patients who had recurrent disease.

RESULTS

Of the 153 enrolled patients, 39 had driver mutations and 13 received additional TKI therapy besides definitive CRT. Patients harboring driver mutations but without additional TKI therapy had a similar PFS and significantly longer OS (p = 0.032) than those without driver mutations. Additional TKI therapy prolonged PFS (p = 0.021) but not OS among patients with driver mutations. No significant difference of pattern of failure was observed between patient subgroups stratified by the status of driver mutations and the usage of additional TKI therapy. Furthermore, 57 of the 95 patients with initial recurrent disease developed oligo-recurrence and salvage local therapy significantly improved OS2 (p = 0.01) among patients with oligo-recurrence disease.

CONCLUSION

LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive CRT generally had similar PFS and pattern of treatment failure, regardless of driver mutation status. Additional TKI therapy besides definitive CRT could prolong PFS but not OS. The majority of recurrent disease after definitive CRT belongs to oligo-recurrence and salvage local therapy may provide survival benefit.

Real-world experience of consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab consolidation is associated with improved survival following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the heterogeneity of stage III NSCLC patients, in this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in the real-world setting.

METHOD

Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients were retrospectively studied: one cohort received CCRT, another had CCRT-durvalumab. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were relapse rate and safety. In CCRT-durvalumab cohort, association between blood markers with survival and pneumonitis risk were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled: 45 received CCRT, and 39 received CCRT-durvalumab. Median PFS was 17.5 months for CCRT-durvalumab and 8.9 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.47, p = 0.038). Median OS was not-reached for CCRT-durvalumab and 22.3 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.35, p = 0.024). Both EGFR-positive and wild-type (WT) patients had numerically improved PFS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT-alone, 17.5 versus 10.9 months and 11.8 versus 6.63 months, respectively (interaction p-value = 0.608). Grade 2+ pneumonitis was detected in 25% of patients in the durvalumab cohort. Most pneumonitis occurred at 3.5 weeks after durvalumab initiation. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3 and ≥5 were associated with shorter PFS with durvalumab. Week 6 platelet-lymphocyte-ratio ≥ 180 was associated with a lower risk of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, durvalumab consolidation post CCRT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS and OS. Effect of durvalumab on PFS was not modified by EGFR status. Active surveillance for pneumonitis is crucial. Baseline NLR may help to predict the benefit of treatment with durvalumab.

Effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on treatment selection and prognostic factors

The pivotal PACIFIC trial defined durvalumab consolidation as the new standard of care in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiochemotherapy. The authors characterized the durvalumab effect after induction chemotherapy according to the ESPATUE trial and definitive radiochemotherapy. All consecutive patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer receiving definitive radiochemotherapy between January 2017 and February 2020 were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Altogether, 160 patients (75 PD-L1-positive, 62 PD-L1-negative, 23 unknown) received definitive radiochemotherapy, 146 (91%) of whom received prior induction chemotherapy. Durvalumab consolidation showed high effectiveness overall and in the good-risk group according to the PACIFIC trial (log-rank test: p < 0.005). Hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival were at the lower limits of those in the PACIFIC trial. These results were robust to adjustment for potential confounders by propensity score weighting. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was the most important pretreatment prognostic factor.

Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by durvalumab

OBJECTIVES

The incidence and predictors of pneumonitis for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the era of consolidation durvalumab have yet to be fully elucidated. In this large single institution analysis, we report the incidence of and factors associated with grade 2 + pneumonitis in NSCLC patients treated with the PACIFIC regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients treated at our institution with definitive CRT followed by durvalumab from 2018 to 2021. Clinical documentation and imaging studies were reviewed to determine grade 2 + pneumonitis events, which required the following: 1) pulmonary symptoms warranting prolonged steroid taper, oxygen dependence, and/or hospital admission and 2) radiographic findings consistent with pneumonitis.

RESULTS

One-hundred ninety patients were included. The majority received 60 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. Median number of durvalumab cycles received was 12 (IQR: 4-22). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, 50 (26.3%) patients experienced grade 2 + pneumonitis with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 27.8% (95% CI: 21.9-35.4). Seventeen (8.9%) patients experienced grade 3 + pneumonitis and 4 grade 5 (2.1%). Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis included ipsilateral and total lung volume receiving 5 Gy or greater (V5Gy), V10Gy, V20Gy, V40Gy, and mean dose and contralateral V40Gy. Heart V5Gy, V10Gy, and mean dose were also significant variables. Overall survival estimates at 1 and 3 years were 87.4% (95% CI: 82.4-92.8) and 60.3% (95% CI: 47.9-74.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We report a risk of pneumonitis higher than that seen on RTOG 0617 and comparable to the PACIFIC study. Multiple lung and heart dosimetric factors were predictive of pneumonitis.

Chemoradiation followed by adjuvant durvalumab in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Real-world comparison of treatment outcomes to historical controls treated with chemoradiation alone

OBJECTIVE

Compare outcomes in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab to historical controls treated with chemoradiation alone.

METHODS

The records of patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation ± adjuvant durvalumab were reviewed retrospectively. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Between September 2009 and September 2020, 215 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (n = 144) or concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant durvalumab (n = 71). Compared to historical controls, durvalumab use was associated with improved PFS: median (27 months vs. 10 months, p < 0.0001), 1-year (83.1% vs. 43.8, p < 0.0001); and improved OS; median (not reached vs. 24 months, p < 0.0001), 1-year (85.9% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed adjuvant durvalumab was associated with increased OS (p = 0.005) and PFS (p = 0.001). Within the durvalumab group, only clinical stage IIIA versus IIIB/C was associated with improved OS (p = 0.049), but not PFS. There was no association between PFS or OS and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, prior history of immune disease, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) receptor status, delay in starting durvalumab beyond 42 days, or development of an AE. During durvalumab treatment, 63 AE were reported in 52 patients with treatment discontinuation in 11. Pneumonitis was the most common AE reported (n = 35, 49%). Most AE were grade 1-2 (n = 57). Grade 3-4 AE were uncommon (n = 6) and none were grade 5.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with adjuvant durvalumab following chemoradiation was associated with improved PFS and OS compared to chemoradiation alone.

Pre-treatment immune status predicts disease control in NSCLCs treated with chemoradiation and durvalumab

BACKGROUND

The impact of peripheral blood immune measures and radiation-induced lymphopenia on outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and immune check point inhibition (ICI) has yet to be fully defined.

METHODS

Stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT and ≥1 dose of durvalumab across a cancer center were examined. Peripheral blood counts were assessed pre-cCRT, during cCRT and at the start of ICI. These measures and risk-scores from two published models estimating radiation dose to immune-bearing organs were tested for association with disease control.

RESULTS

We assessed 113 patients treated with cCRT and a median of 8.5 months of durvalumab. Median PFS was 29 months (95% CI 18-35 months). A lower pre-cCRT ALC (HR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.32-0.82), p = 0.02) and a higher pre-cCRT ANC (HR: 1.14 (1.06-1.23), p = 0.005) were associated with poor PFS. Neither ALC nadir, ALC at ICI start, ANC at ICI start or the normalized change in ALC from pre-cCRT to nadir were significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.07-0.49). Also, risk scores from the two radiation-dose models were not associated with PFS (p = 0.14, p = 0.21) but were so with the ALC Nadir (p = 0.001, p = 0.002). A higher pre-cCRT NLR was the strongest predictor for PFS (HR: 1.09 (1.05-1.14), p = 0.0001). The 12-month PFS in patients with the bottom vs. top NLR tertile was 84% vs 46% (p = 0.000004).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline differences in peripheral immune cell populations are associated with disease outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with cCRT and ICI.

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Consolidation Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved patient outcomes in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since the practice-changing results of the PACIFIC trial, while real-world evidence regarding the PACIFIC regimen has not been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis comprehensively investigated the real-world toxicity and efficacy of this regimen and identified differences between the real world and clinical trials.

METHODS

Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases. We summarized the differences in demographic and therapeutic characteristics between RWSs and the PACIFIC trial. A meta-analysis of short-term efficacy and adverse event rates was performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 1,885 patients were included. More elderly and poor performance status patients, prolonged interval from CRT completion to durvalumab exceeding 42 days, median infusions of durvalumab less than 20 cycles and sequential CRT were observed in the real world. The pooled 12-month overall-survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) rates were 90% (95% CI, 83%-98%) and 62% (95% CI, 56%-68%), respectively. Subgroup analysis determined that delay in durvalumab initiation beyond 42 days neither impacted 12-month OS (P=0.068) nor PFS (P=0.989). Pooled incidences of all-grade and ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis were 35% (95% CI, 22%-48%) and 6% (95% CI, 3%-8%), respectively. Higher all-grade pneumonitis rates were observed in the studies with a median age of patients > 65 years (P=0.008) and from Asian regions (P=0.017), whereas expanded-access-program-related studies reported significantly lower rates (P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and short-term efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in real-life use align with the PACIFIC trial. RWSs can be helpful for understanding the true efficacy and toxicity of consolidation durvalumab given the less restrictive eligibility criteria.

Clinical outcomes in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab after sequential or concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy - single institute experience

Background

Chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) followed by 12-month durvalumab is the new standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Survival data for patients from everyday routine clinical practice is scarce, as well as potential impact on treatment efficacy of sequential or concomitant chemotherapy and the usage of gemcitabine.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analysed unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who were treated with durvalumab after radical concurrent or sequential chemotherapy (ChT) from December 2017 and completed treatment until December 2020. We assessed progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity regarding baseline characteristic of patients.

Results

Eighty-five patients with median age of 63 years of which 70.6% were male, 56.5% in stage IIIB and 58.8% with squamous cell carcinoma, were included in the analysis. Thirty-one patients received sequential ChT only, 51 patients received induction and concurrent ChT and 3 patients received concurrent ChT only. Seventy-nine patients (92.9%) received gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and switched to etoposide and cisplatin during concurrent treatment with radiotherapy (RT). Patients started durvalumab after a median of 57 days (range 12–99 days) from the end of the RT and were treated with the median of 10.8 (range 0.5–12 months) months. Forty-one patients (48.2%) completed treatment with planned 12-month therapy, 25 patients (29.4%) completed treatment early due to the toxicity and 16 patients (18.8%) due to the disease progression. Median PFS was 22.0 months, 12- and estimated 24-month PFS were 71% (95% CI: 61.2–80.8%) and 45.8% (95% CI: 32.7–58.9%). With the median follow-up time of 23 months (range 2–35 months), median OS has not been reached. Twelve- and estimated 24-month OS were 86.7% (95% CI: 79.5–93.9%) and 68.6% (95% CI: 57.2–79.9%).

Conclusions

Our survival data are comparable with published research as well as with recently published real-world reports. Additionally, the regimen with gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy as induction treatment was efficient and well tolerated.

A Real-World, Multicenter, Observational Retrospective Study of Durvalumab After Concomitant or Sequential Chemoradiation for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

For unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard therapy consists of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab maintenance for responding patients. The present study reports on the safety and outcome of durvalumab use after CRT in a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-eight patients have been included. We collected data on systemic therapy, radiation therapy, the timing between CRT and durvalumab, number of durvalumab cycles, reasons for non-starting or discontinuation, incidence and grade of adverse events (AEs), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

One hundred fifty-five patients out of 238 (65.1%) received at least one durvalumab dose: 91 (58.7%) after concomitant CRT (cCRT) and 64 (41.3%) after sequential CRT (sCRT). Programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was unknown in 7/155 (4.5%), negative in 14 (9.1%), and positive ≥1% in 134/155 (86.4%). The main reasons for non-starting durvalumab were progression (10.1%), PD-L1 negativity (7.5%), and lung toxicity (4.6%). Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 2–29); 1-year PFS and OS were 65.5% (95%CI: 57.6-74.4) and 87.9% (95%CI: 82.26.6-93.9), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were detected for cCRT vs. sCRT, but the median PFS was 13.5 months for sCRT vs. 23 months for cCRT. Potentially immune-related AEs were recorded in 76/155 patients (49.0%). Pneumonitis was the most frequent, leading to discontinuation in 11/155 patients (7.1%).

Conclusions

Durvalumab maintenenace after concurrent or sequential chemoradiation for unresectable, stage III NSCLC showed very promising short-term survival results in a large, multicenter, restrospective, real-world study. Durvalumab was the first drug obtaining a survival benefit over CRT within the past two decades, and the present study contributes to validating its use in clinical practice.

Association Between the Early Discontinuation of Durvalumab and Poor Survival in Patients With Stage III NSCLC

Introduction

Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) has been found to improve outcomes of patients with unresected stage III NSCLC. However, the survival impact of discontinuing durvalumab early owing to adverse events (AEs) remains unknown.

Methods

Patients with stage III NSLCC treated with cCRT and greater than or equal to one dose of durvalumab across a multisite cancer center were evaluated. The median durvalumab treatment duration among patients who discontinued owing to AEs (2.1 mo) defined two patient cohorts: early discontinuation (<2.1 mo) and late discontinuation. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were assessed.

Results

In total, 113 patients treated with cCRT and a median of 8.5 months of durvalumab were assessed, of which 30 (26%) discontinued durvalumab owing to AEs after a median of 2.1 months of treatment. Patients in the early- and late-discontinuation cohorts were treated with a median of 0.9 and 4.3 months of durvalumab, respectively. The median PFS among patients who did not discontinue durvalumab owing to AEs was 29.5 months. Among patients that discontinued durvalumab owing to AEs, overall survival and PFS were inferior in the early- versus late-discontinuation cohort (median PFS = 10.7 versus 32.9 mo, p < 0.001) and durvalumab treatment duration associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 0.52 [95% confidence interval: 0.31–0.88], p = 0.014).

Conclusions

We found that the duration of durvalumab treatment among patients who discontinued therapy owing to AEs impacts survival. However, patients treated with approximately 4 months of durvalumab maintained outcomes as compared with patients who did not discontinue therapy owing to AEs. Durvalumab rechallenge should be considered in patients with less than 2 months of therapy.

Durvalumab after concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The standard of care for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab. Although doses higher than 66 Gy are standard in our center, they were used in only 6.9% of patients in the PACIFIC trial. We report our experience with durvalumab after high-dose radiotherapy. The database of a tertiary hospital for patients with stage III NSCLC who were treated with CRT and adjuvant durvalumab was evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local-regional failure (LRF) were measured from the administration of durvalumab. Thirty-nine patients were included. All were treated with intensity-modulated radiation (mean dose 69.9 Gy); Median follow-up time was 20.4 months (range 1–35.4). At 12 months, PFS was 49%, OS 79%, and LRF 14%. Intrathoracic failure at first progression was demonstrated in 8 (21%) patients. Adverse events requiring corticosteroids occurred in 10(25.6%) patients: pneumonitis – 6 (15.4%), hepatitis – 2 (5.1%), and arthralgia and pericarditis – 1 (2.6%). One patient (2.6%) died of pneumonitis. The occurrence of pneumonitis was significantly associated with lung V5 (55% vs. 42%, p = .04) and V20 (28% vs. 19%, p = .01) and mean lung dose (14.8 Gy vs.11.6 Gy, p = .05). The similar 12-month PFS and OS rates of our cohort and the PACIFIC trial support the use of high-dose radiotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC. Treatment-related mortality was similar to the PACIFIC results. The intrathoracic failure rate in our cohort was lower than that reported from the PACIFIC trial, suggesting that radiation dose escalation may improve local control.

Planning target volume as a predictor of disease progression in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and concurrent and/or sequential immune checkpoint inhibition

Background. The present study evaluates outcome after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent and/or sequential Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) or Ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) for inoperable stage III NSCLC patients depending on planning target volume (PTV). Method and patients. Prospective data of thirty-three consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT and sequential durvalumab (67%, 22 patients) or concurrent and sequential nivolumab (33%, 11 patients) were analyzed. Different PTV cut offs and PTV as a continuous variable were evaluated for their association with progression-free (PFS), local–regional progression-free (LRPFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free (eMFS) and brain-metastasis free-survival (BMFS). Results. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT); 93% to a total dose of at least 60 Gy, 97% of patients received two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19.9 (range: 6.0–42.4) months; median overall survival (OS), LRFS, BMFS and eMFS were not reached. Median PFS was 22.8 (95% CI: 10.7–34.8) months. Patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm had a significantly shorter PFS (6.9 vs 22.8 months, p = 0.020) and eMFS (8.1 months vs. not reached, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm and stage IIIC disease (UICC-TNM Classification 8th Edition) achieved a very poor outcome with a median PFS and eMFS of 3.6 vs 22.8 months (p < 0.001) and 3.6 months vs. not reached (p = 0.001), respectively. PTV as a continuous variable also had a significant impact on eMFS (p = 0.048). However, no significant association of different PTV cut-offs or PTV as a continuous variable with LRPFS and BMFS could be shown. The multivariate analysis that was performed for PTV ≥ 900ccm and age (≥ 65 years), gender (male), histology (non-ACC) as well as T- and N-stage (T4, N3) as covariates also revealed PTV ≥ 900ccm as the only factor that had a significant correlation with PFS (HR: 5.383 (95% CI:1.263–22.942, p = 0.023)). Conclusion. In this prospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive CRT combined with concurrent and/or sequential CPI, significantly shorter PFS and eMFS were observed in patients with initial PTV ≥ 900ccm.

Real-world prospective analysis of treatment patterns in durvalumab maintenance after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC patients

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the clinical use and real-world efficacy of durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable stage, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All consecutive patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression (≥1%) treated after October 2018 were included. Regular follow up, including physical examination, PET/CT and/or contrast-enhanced CT-Thorax/Abdomen were performed every three months after CRT. Descriptive treatment pattern analyses, including reasons of discontinuation and salvage treatment, were undertaken. Statistics were calculated from the last day of thoracic irradiation (TRT). Twenty-six patients were included. Median follow up achieved 20.6 months (range: 1.9-30.6). Durvalumab was initiated after a median of 25 (range: 13-103) days after completion of CRT. In median 14 (range: 2-24) cycles of durvalumab were applied within 6.4 (range 1-12.7) months. Six patients (23%) are still in treatment and seven (27%) have completed treatment with 24 cycles. Maintenance treatment was discontinued in 13 (50%) patients: 4 (15%) patients developed grade 3 pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5 after a median of 3.9 (range: 0.5-11.6) months and 7 (range: 2-17) cycles of durvalumab. Four (15%) patients developed grade 2 skin toxicity. One (4%) patient has discontinued treatment due to incompliance. Six and 12- month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82% and 62%, median PFS was not reached. No case of hyperprogression was documented. Eight (31%) patients have relapsed during maintenance treatment after a median of 4.8 (range: 2.2-11.3) months and 11 (range: 6-17) durvalumab cycles. Two patients (9%) developed a local-regional recurrence after 14 and 17 cycles of durvalumab. Extracranial distant metastases and brain metastases as first site of failure were detected in 4 (15%) and 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Three (13%) patients presented with symptomatic relapse. Our prospective study confirmed a favourable safety profile of durvalumab maintenance treatment after completion of CRT in unresectable stage, locally advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting. In a median follow-up time of 20.6 months, durvalumab was discontinued in 27% of all patients due to progressive disease. All patients with progressive disease were eligible for second-line treatment.

The Impact of Durvalumab on Local-Regional Control in Stage III NSCLCs Treated With Chemoradiation and on KEAP1-NFE2L2-Mutant Tumors

INTRODUCTION

KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLCs are chemoradiation resistant and at high risk for local-regional failure (LRF) after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT). To elucidate the impact of durvalumab on local-regional control, we evaluated LRF in patients with NSCLC treated with cCRT with and without durvalumab.

METHODS

Patients with stage III NSCLC treated with cCRT or cCRT and durvalumab who underwent tumor genomic profiling were evaluated. The incidence of LRF and outcomes of patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors were evaluated.

RESULTS

We analyzed 120 consecutive patients (cCRT alone, n = 54; cCRT and durvalumab, n = 66). Patients treated with cCRT alone had significantly more LRF events compared with those treated with cCRT and durvalumab, with 12-month LRF incidence of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%-54%) and 18% (95% CI: 8%-28%), respectively (p = 0.002). Among patients treated with cCRT alone and cCRT and durvalumab, 20 patients (37%) and 18 patients (27%), respectively, had KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors. In patients treated with cCRT alone, those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had worse local-regional control (p = 0.015), and on multivariate analysis, KEAP1-NFE2L2 mutation predicted for LRF (hazard ratio = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.6-9.8, p = 0.003). Nevertheless, patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had similar LRF outcomes (p = 0.541) when treated with cCRT and durvalumab, and mutational status did not predict for LRF (p = 0.545). Among those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors, cCRT and durvalumab significantly reduced the incidence of LRF compared with cCRT alone: 12-month LRF incidence of 62% (95% CI: 40%-84%) versus 25% (95% CI: 4%-46%), respectively (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab after cCRT significantly improves local-regional control and reduces LRF in chemoradiation-resistant KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLC tumors.

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy for PD-L1 Expressing Inoperable Stage III NSCLC Leads to Significant Improvement of Local-Regional Control and Overall Survival in the Real-World Setting

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is a new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with CRT to those treated with CRT and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. The analysis was performed based on the retro- and prospectively collected data of 144 consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated between 2011-2020. Local-regional-progression-free-survival (LRPFS-defined as progression in the mediastinum, hilum and/or supraclavicular region at both sites and the involved lung), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated from the last day of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 33.1 months (range: 6.3-111.8) and median overall survival was 27.2 (95% CI: 19.5-34.9) months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3-27.4) months, median PFS was not reached, LRPFS (p = 0.002), PFS (p = 0.018), and OS (p = 0.005) were significantly improved vs. the historical cohort of conventional CRT patients. After propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis with age, gender, histology, tumor volume, and treatment mode, and exact matching for T-and N-stage, 22 CRT-IO patients were matched 1:2 to 44 CRT patients. Twelve-month LRPFS, PFS, and OS rates in the CRT-IO vs. CRT cohort were 78.9 vs. 45.5% (p = 0.002), 60.0 vs. 31.8% (p = 0.007), and 100 vs. 70.5% (p = 0.003), respectively. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after CRT led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort.

An integrative pan-cancer analysis of COPB1 based on data mining

BACKGROUND

Cancer will become the leading cause of death worldwide in the 21st century, meanwhile, immunotherapy is the most popular cancer treatment method in recent years. COPI Coat Complex Subunit Beta 1 (COPB1) relates to human innate immunity. However, the role of COPB1 in pan-cancer remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between COPB1 mRNA expression and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and immune examination sites in pan-cancer.

METHODS

Data from multiple online databases were collected. The BioGPS, UALCAN Database, COSMIC, cBioPortal, Cancer Regulome tools, Kaplan-Meier Plotter and TIMER website were utilized to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

Upregulation of COPB1 has been widely observed in tumor tissues compared with normal tissues. Although COPB1 has poor prognosis in pan-cancer, COPB1 high expression was beneficial to the survival of ESCA patients. Unlike ESCA, COPB1 expression in STAD was positively correlated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, including B cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Finally, we also found that the expression of COPB1 in STAD was positively correlated with PD-L1 and CTLA4.

CONCLUSIONS

COPB1 may be a prognostic biomarker for pan-carcinoma, and also provide an immune anti-tumor strategy for STAD based on the expression of COPB1.

Effect of durvalumab on local control after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in comparison with chemoradiotherapy alone

Background

Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (LA‐NSCLC) has been found to significantly improve overall survival (OS). However, the effect of durvalumab on local control remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effect of the durvalumab on local control in comparison with the clinical result of patients treated with CCRT alone.

Methods

A total of 120 LA‐NSCLC patients including 76 patients with CCRT alone and 44 patients with CCRT followed by durvalumab were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics of CCRT alone cohort and durvalumab cohort were compared with student's t test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and with chi‐squared test for categorical variables. Local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log‐rank test.

Results

There were 19 patients with stage II disease and 101 patients with stage III disease. Age, sex, histopathological type, T classification, N classification, clinical stage, tumor volume and dose fractionation schedule were not significantly different between the CCRT alone and durvalumab cohorts. The one‐year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort (86%) compared with the CCRT alone cohort (62%) (P = 0.005), whereas no significant difference was observed in either PFS (P = 0.864) or OS (P = 0.443) between the CCRT and durvalumab cohorts.

Conclusions

The one‐year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort compared with the CCRT alone cohort. Although the follow‐up period was too short to draw definitive conclusions, the study revealed that durvalumab might have a significant effect on LC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Effect of durvalumab on local control after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer is unclear

What this study adds

The one‐year local control rate of chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab was significantly higher compared with chemoradiotherapy alone.

Deep diving in the PACIFIC: Practical issues in stage III non-small cell lung cancer to avoid shipwreck

After publication of the PACIFIC trial results, immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy was included in the treatment algorithm of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PACIFIC trial demonstrated that 12 mo of durvalumab consolidation therapy after radical-intent platinum doublet chemotherapy with concomitant radiotherapy improved both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. This is the first treatment in decades to successfully improve survival in this clinical setting, with manageable toxicity and without deterioration in quality of life. The integration of durvalumab in the management of locally advanced NSCLC accentuates the need for multidisciplinary, coordinated decision-making among lung cancer specialists, bringing new challenges and controversies as well as important changes in clinical work routines. The aim of the present article is to review-from a practical, multidisciplinary perspective-the findings and implications of the PACIFIC trial. We evaluate the immunobiological basis of durvalumab as well as practical aspects related to programmed cell death ligand 1 determination. In addition, we comprehensively assess the efficacy and toxicity data from the PACIFIC trial and discuss the controversies and practical aspects of incorporating durvalumab into routine clinical practice. Finally, we discuss unresolved questions and future challenges. In short, the present document aims to provide clinicians with a practical guide for the application of the PACIFIC regimen in routine clinical practice.

Tumor mutation burden predicts response and survival to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Background

Cancer is one of the world’s top three causes of death now. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show encouraging ability to treat some malignancies due to its long-term efficacy and low side effects. However, the predictive biomarker of the immunotherapy efficacy has been inconclusive. Thus, exploring new biomarkers is important.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether tumor mutation burden (TMB) could be a predictive biomarker of the efficacy of ICIs. Using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, we searched for articles about TMB and the prognosis of patients with multiple malignancies conducted from 1984 to May 22, 2020. We identified the relationship between TMB and the clinical efficacy of ICIs by using Stata 12.1 software.

Results

Eighteen articles with a total of 4,535 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Results showed that high-TMB patients had better progression-free survival (PFS) than low-TMB patients with cancer treated with ICIs (HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.36–0.56, P=0.002). Moreover, high-TMB patients had longer overall survival (OS) than low-TMB patients. However, the heterogeneity was extremely high, so the result regarding OS was meaningless (HR =0.56; 95% CI: 0.44–0.70, P=0.000, I-squares: 72.6%).

Conclusions

Our study indicates that high TMB is associated with better PFS. Thus, TMB can be considered as a predictive marker of PFS of patients treated with ICIs in the future.