Prospective assessment of mask versus frame fixation during Gamma Knife treatment for brain metastases

Comparative effectiveness of frame-based and mask-based Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases: A 509 patient meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is the primary treatment for patients with limited numbers of small brain metastases. Head fixation is usually performed with framed-based (FB) fixation; however, mask-based (MB) fixation has emerged as a less invasive alternative. A comparative meta-analysis between both approaches has not been performed.

METHODS

Databases were searched until August 28th, 2023, to identify studies comparing MB and FB SRS in the treatment of brain metastases. Our outcomes of interest included local tumor control (LTC), radiation necrosis (RN), mortality, and treatment time (TT). Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and hazard ratio (HR) were used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

From 295 articles initially identified, six studies (1 clinical trial) involving 509 patients were included. LTC revealed comparable RR at 6-months (RR = 0.95[95%CI = 0.89-1.01], p = 0.12) and a marginal benefit in FB SRS at 1-year (RR = 0.87[95%CI = 0.78-0.96], p = 0.005). However, in oligometastases exclusively treated with single-fraction SRS, LTC was similar among groups (RR = 0.92 [95%CI = 0.89-1.0], p = 0.30). Similarly, in patients with oligometastases treated with single-fraction SRS, RN (HR = 1.69; 95%CI = 0.72-3.97, p = 0.22), TT (MD = -29.64; 95%CI = -80.38-21.10, p = 0.25), and mortality were similar among groups (RR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.22-1.76, p = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that FB and MB SRS, particularly oligometastases treated with single-fraction, are comparable in terms of LTC, RN, TT, and mortality. Further research is essential to draw definitive conclusions.

Treatment Planning Methods for Dose Painting by Numbers Treatment in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Purpose

Dose painting radiation therapy delivers a nonuniform dose to tumors to account for heterogeneous radiosensitivity. With recent and ongoing development of Gamma Knife machines making large-volume brain tumor treatments more practical, it is increasingly feasible to deliver dose painting treatments. The increased prescription complexity means automated treatment planning is greatly beneficial, and the impact of dose painting on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan quality has not yet been studied. This research investigates the plan quality achievable for Gamma Knife SRS dose painting treatments when using optimization techniques and automated isocenter placement in treatment planning.

Methods and Materials

Dose painting prescription functions with varying parameters were applied to convert voxel image intensities to prescriptions for 10 sample cases. To study achievable plan quality and optimization, clinically placed isocenters were used with each dose painting prescription and optimized using a semi-infinite linear programming formulation. To study automated isocenter placement, a grassfire sphere-packing algorithm and a clinically available Leksell gamma plan isocenter fill algorithm were used. Plan quality for each optimized treatment plan was measured with dose painting SRS metrics.

Results

Optimization can be used to find high quality dose painting plans, and plan quality is affected by the dose painting prescription method. Polynomial function prescriptions show more achievable plan quality than sigmoid function prescriptions even with high mean dose boost. Automated isocenter placement is shown as a feasible method for dose painting SRS treatment, and increasing the number of isocenters improves plan quality. The computational solve time for optimization is within 5 minutes in most cases, which is suitable for clinical planning.

Conclusions

The impact of dose painting prescription method on achievable plan quality is quantified in this study. Optimization and automated isocenter placement are shown as possible treatment planning methods to obtain high quality plans.

Homogenous dose prescription in Gamma Knife Radiotherapy: Combining the best of both worlds

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery with linear accelerators (LINACs) or Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK, Elekta AB) is an established treatment option for intracranial tumors. When those are involving/abutting organs at risk (OAR), homogenous and normofractionated treatments outmatch single fraction deliveries. In such situations, it would be desirable to balance LINAC's homogeneity benefits with LGK's dose gradient attributes. In this study, we determined homogeneity and OAR sparing ranges using a non-clinical, homogenous prototype version of LGK Lightning.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed thirty fractionated LGK Icon in-house patients with acoustic neuromas, pituitary adenomas and meningiomas. Four treatment plans were generated (54 Gy,1.8 Gy/fx) per patient: one LINAC plan, one clinical Lightning plan ("LGK") and two prototype Lightning plans ("LGK Hom" and "LGK OAR"). We analyzed Dmean and D2% for different OAR, Gradient Index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), Homogeneity Index (HI) and beam-on-time (BOT).

RESULTS

While the LINAC vs. Lightning plans (LGK Hom|LGK OAR|LGK) boast better homogeneity (median: 1.08 vs. 1.18|1.24|1.35) and shorter BOT (median: 137 s vs. 432 s|510 s|510 s), Lightning plans show improved GI (median: 6.68 vs. 3.86|3.50|3.19), similar PCI (median: 0.75 vs. 0.76|0.75|0.82) and significantly reduced OAR doses. For in-tumor OAR, LGK Hom and LINAC plans achieves similar OAR sparing with improved GI for LGK Hom.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is a preliminary attempt to combine the dosimetric advantages of LINAC and LGK treatment planning. We observed that LGK plan homogeneity can be improved toward LINAC standards while maintaining the LGK advantage of favorable OAR doses and GI. Additionally, in-tumor OAR hotspots can be considerably reduced.

A multi-centre stereotactic radiosurgery planning study of multiple brain metastases using isocentric linear accelerators with 5 and 2.5 mm width multi-leaf collimators, CyberKnife and Gamma Knife

Objectives

This study compared plans of high definition (HD), 2.5 mm width multi-leaf collimator (MLC), to standard, 5 mm width, isocentric linear accelerator (linacs), CyberKnife (CK), and Gamma Knife (GK) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques on multiple brain metastases.

Methods

Eleven patients undergoing SRS for multiple brain metastases were chosen. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated and optimized SRS plans were generated and compared.

Results

The linacs delivered similar conformity index (CI) values, but the gradient index (GI) for HD MLCs was significantly lower (P-value <.001). Half the OARs received significantly lower dose using HD MLCs. CK delivered a significantly lower CI than HD MLC linac (P-value <.001), but a significantly higher GI (P-value <.001). CI was significantly improved with the HD MLC linac compared to GK (P-value = 4.591 × 10-3), however, GK delivered a significantly lower GI (P-value <.001). OAR dose sparing was similar for the HD MLC TL, CK, and GK.

Conclusions

Comparing linacs for SRS, the preferred choice is HD MLCs. Similar results were achieved with the HD MLC linac, CK, or GK, with each delivering significant improvements in different aspects of plan quality.

Advances in knowledge

This article is the first to compare HD and standard width MLC linac plans using a combination of single isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy and multi-isocentric dynamic conformal arc plans as required, which is a more clinically relevant assessment. Furthermore, it compares these plans with CK and GK, assessing the relative merits of each technique.

Plan Assessment Metrics for Dose Painting in Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

As radiation therapy treatment precision increases with advancements in imaging and radiation delivery, dose painting treatment becomes increasingly feasible, where targets receive a nonuniform radiation dose. The high precision of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) makes it a good candidate for dose painting treatments, but no suitable metrics to assess dose painting SRS plans exist. Existing dose painting assessment metrics weigh target overdose and underdose equally but are unsuited for SRS plans, which typically avoid target underdose more. Current SRS metrics also prioritize reducing healthy tissue dose through selectivity and dose fall-off, and these metrics assume single prescriptions. We propose a set of metrics for dose painting SRS that would meet clinical needs and are calculated with nonuniform dose painting prescriptions.

Methods and Materials

Sample dose painting SRS prescriptions are first created from Gamma Knife SRS cases, apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance images, and various image-to-prescription functions. Treatment plans are found through semi-infinite linear programming optimization and using clinically determined isocenters, then assessed with existing and proposed metrics. Modified versions of SRS metrics are proposed, including coverage, selectivity, conformity, efficiency, and gradient indices. Quality factor, a current dose painting metric, is applied both without changes and with modifications. A new metric, integral dose ratio, is proposed as a measure of target overdose.

Results

The merits of existing and modified metrics are demonstrated and discussed. A modified conformity index using mean or minimum prescription dose would be suitable for dose painting SRS with integral or maximum boost methods, respectively. Either modified efficiency index is a suitable replacement for the existing gradient index.

Conclusions

The proposed modified SRS metrics are appropriate measures of plan quality for dose painting SRS plans and have the advantage of giving equal values as the original SRS metrics when applied to single-prescription plans.

Combined helical tomotherapy and Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for high-grade recurrent orbital meningioma: a case report

Orbital meningioma is a rare type of orbital tumor with high invasiveness and recurrence rates, making it extremely challenging to treat. Due to the special location of the disease, surgery often cannot completely remove the tumor, requiring postoperative radiation therapy. Here, we report a case of an elderly male patient with right-sided proptosis, visual impairment, and diplopia. Imaging diagnosis revealed a space-occupying lesion in the extraconal space of the right orbit. Pathological and immunohistochemical examination of the resected tumor confirmed it as a grade 3 anaplastic meningioma. Two months after surgery, the patient complained of right eye swelling and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed a recurrence of the tumor. The patient received helical tomotherapy (TOMO) in the postoperative tumor bed and high-risk areas within the orbit with a total dose of 48Gy. However, there was no significant improvement in the patient's right eye swelling, and the size of the recurrent lesion showed no significant change on imaging. Gamma knife multifractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (MF-SRS) was then given to the recurrent lesion with 50% prescription dose 13.5Gy/3f, once every other day. An imaging diagnosis performed 45 days later showed that the tumor had disappeared completely. The patient's vision remained unchanged, but diplopia was significantly relieved after MF-SRS. We propose a new hybrid treatment model for recurrent orbital meningioma, where conventional radiation therapy ensures local control of high-risk areas around the postoperative cavity, and MF-SRS maximizes the radiation dose to recurrent lesion areas while protecting surrounding tissues and organs.

Fractionated versus staged gamma knife radiosurgery for mid-to-large brain metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

To compare treatment results between fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (f-GKRS) and staged gamma knife radiosurgery (s-GKRS) for mid-to-large brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with medium (4-10 mL) to large (> 10 mL) BMs who underwent s-GKRS or f-GKRS between March 2008 and September 2022. Patients were treated with (i) s-GKRS before May 2018 and (ii) f-GKRS after May 2018. Patients who underwent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at least once were enrolled. Case-matched studies were conducted by applying propensity score matching to minimize treatment selection bias and potential confounding. Local control (LC) was set as the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS) as the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

This study included 129 patients with 136 lesions and 70 patients with 78 lesions who underwent s-GKRS and f-GKRS, respectively. Overall, 124 lesions (62 lesions in each group) were selected in the case-matched group. No differences were observed in the 6-month and 1-year cumulative incidences of LC failure between the s-GKRS and f-GKRS groups (15.6% vs. 15.9% at 6 months and 25.6% vs. 25.6% at 1 year; p = 0.617). One-year OS rates were 62.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.4-75.7%) and 73.9% (95% CI: 58.8-84.2%) in the s-GKRS and f-GKRS groups, respectively. The post-GKRS median survival time was shorter in the s-GKRS group than in the f-GKRS group (17 vs. 36 months), without significance (p = 0.202).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare f-GKRS and s-GKRS in large BMs. Fractionation is as effective as staged GKRS for treating mid-to-large BMs.

Brainstem Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Masked versus Framed Immobilization

BACKGROUND

Patients with brainstem metastases (BSMs) have minimal surgical options due to high-risk anatomy. To review our efficacy treating BSM using Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we compared results on the basis of the utilization of mask-fixation (MF) or frame-fixation (FF).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected for 32 patients. Follow-up data for 49 lesions were analyzed for local control rate (LCR) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Primary cancers included lung, breast, and melanoma; most lesions were pontine. MF was used in 18 patients. Average tumor volume was 0.99 cm3 (0.005-13.3 cm3). Thirty-nine lesions were treated with single-fraction 16 Gy. Ten lesions were treated in 3-5 fractions with mean dose of 22.5 Gy. Mean follow-up was 14.2 months (1.2-48.2 months). One-year LCR was 94.7%. ORR at last follow-up did not differ between MF and FF (P = 0.81). Average reduction of lesion volume at 6 and 12 months did not differ between MF and FF (64% vs. 45%, P = 0.77; 70% vs. 77%, P = 0.78). Failure occurred in a pontine colorectal cancer metastasis mask-immobilized for treatment with 14 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS for BSM achieved high LCR despite variability in tumor size and histology with no significant difference between MF and FF. Although trials have historically excluded patients with BSM, our data support SRS as a safe and efficacious treatment. This is the first study showing that MF provides equivalent, successful outcomes when compared with FF for patients with BSM.

Assessment of intra-fraction motion during frameless image guided Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery

As frameless stereotactic radiosurgery increase in use, the aim of this study was to evaluate intra-fraction motion through cone-beam CT (CBCT) and high-definition motion management (HDMM) systems. Intra-fraction motion measured between localization, repeat localization and post-treatment CBCTs were correlated to intra-faction motion indicated by the HDMM files using the Pearson coefficient (r). A total of 302 plans were reviewed from 263 patients (114 male, 149 female); 216 pairs of localization-repeat localization, and 260 localization-post-treatment CBCTs were analyzed against HDMM logs. We found the magnitude of intra-fraction motion detected by the HDMM system were larger than the corresponding CBCT results.

Optimal mask fixation method for frameless radiosurgery with Leksell Gamma Knife IconTM

The Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Icon^TM is used for mask-based and frame-based fixation. The mask fixation provides a noninvasive method. However, an optimal mask fixation method is yet to be established. We evaluated the characteristics of three mask fixation methods (Plain, Folded, and Wide) for the LGK Icon^TM . Force-sensitive resistor sensors were attached to the forehead, supraorbital, zygoma, mandible, and occipital bone of the phantom, and digital humidity and temperature sensors were attached to both temporal lobes. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and high-definition motion management (HDMM) for each mask fixation method were used to evaluate the phantom motion during the initial application. Subsequently, the mask was removed and reapplied on the second (1st reapplication) and third days (2nd reapplication). In the initial application, forces acting on most portions of the phantom were stabilized within 1.5 h. The largest force acted on the occipital bone for the Plain and Wide methods and on the mandible for the Folded method. The temperature rapidly approaches the initial temperature, whereas the humidity gradually approached the initial humidity in all fixation methods. The Folded method exhibited a significantly lower translation along the Y-axis of the Leksell coordinate system, and rotations along all axes were under 0.5°. The HDMM values remained at 0.1 mm for all fixation methods. In the reapplications, the force acting on the occipital bone was significantly greater than that during the initial application for all mask fixation methods; the temperature and humidity remained unchanged. All mask fixation methods in the 1st reapplication were not significantly different from those in the 2nd reapplication. The Folded method is recommended as an optimal mask fixation for patients who require tight fixation; the Wide method can be considered if patient comfort is a priority.

Dosimetric Analysis of Intra-Fraction Motion Detected by Surface-Guided Radiation Therapy During Linac Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) immobilization with an open face mask is more comfortable and less invasive than frame based, but concerns about intrafraction motion must be addressed. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is an attractive option for intrafraction patient monitoring because it is continuous, has submillimeter accuracy, and uses no ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric consequences of uncorrected intrafraction patient motion detected during frameless linac-based SRS.

Methods and Materials

Fifty-five SRS patients were monitored during treatment using SGRT between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2020. If SGRT detected motion >1 mm, imaging was repeated and the necessary shifts were made before continuing treatment. For the 25 patients with intrafraction 3-dimensional vector shifts of ≥1 mm, we moved the isocenter in the planning system using the translational shifts from the repeat imaging and recalculated the plans to determine the dosimetric effect of the shifts. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, minimum gross tumor volume (GTV) dose (relative and absolute), and normal brain V12 were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare planned and simulated dosimetric parameters and median 2 sample tests were used to investigate these differences between cone and multileaf collimator (MLC) plans.

Results

For simulated plans, V12 increased by a median of 0.01 cc (P = .006) and relative GTV minimum dose and PTV coverage decreased by a median of 15.8% (P < .001) and 10.2 % (P < .001), respectively. Absolute minimum GTV dose was found to be significantly lower in the simulated plans (P < .001). PTV coverage decreased more for simulated cone plans than for simulated MLC plans (11.6% vs 4.7%, P = .011) but median V12 differences were found to be significantly larger for MLC plans (-0.34 cc vs -0.01 cc, P = .011). Differences in GTV minimum dose between cone and MLC plans were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

SGRT detected clinically meaningful intrafraction motion during frameless SRS, which could lead to large underdoses and increased normal brain dose if uncorrected.

Zero Setup Margin Mask versus Frame Immobilization during Gamma Knife® Icon™ Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

We compared the clinical outcomes of BM treated with mask immobilization with zero-SM (i.e., zero-PTV) to standard zero-SM frame immobilization SRS. Consecutive patients with BM, 0.5−2.0 cm in maximal diameter, treated with single-fraction SRS (22−24 Gy) during March 2019−February 2021 were included. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed using the Kaplan−Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 150 patients with 453 BM met inclusion criteria. A total of 129 (28.5%) lesions were treated with a zero-SM mask immobilization and 324 (71.5%) with zero-SM frame immobilization. Frame immobilization treatments were associated with a higher proportion of gastrointestinal and fewer breast-cancer metastases (p = 0.024), and a higher number of treated lesions per SRS course (median 7 vs. 3; p < 0.001). With a median follow up of 15 months, there was no difference in FFLF between the mask and frame immobilization groups on univariable (p = 0.29) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.518). Actuarial FFLF at 1 year was 90.5% for mask and 92% for frame immobilization (p = 0.272). Radiation necrosis rates at 1 year were 12.5% for mask and 4.1% for frame immobilization (p = 0.502). For BM 0.5−2.0 cm in maximal diameter treated with single-fraction SRS using 22−24 Gy, mask immobilization with zero SM produces comparable clinical outcomes to frame immobilization. The initial findings support omitting a SM when using mask immobilization with this treatment approach on a Gamma Knife® Icon™.

Geometric distortion assessment in 3T MR images used for treatment planning in cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy

Magnetic Resonance images (MRIs) are employed in brain Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for target and/or critical organ localization and delineation. However, MRIs are inherently distorted, which also impacts the accuracy of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography (MRI/CT) co-registration process. In this phantom-based study, geometric distortion is assessed in 3T T2-weighted images (T2WIs), while the efficacy of an MRI distortion correction technique is also evaluated. A homogeneous polymer gel-filled phantom was CT-imaged before being irradiated with 26 4-mm Gamma Knife shots at predefined locations (reference control points). The irradiated phantom was MRI-scanned at 3T, implementing a T2-weighted protocol suitable for SRS/SRT treatment planning. The centers of mass of all shots were identified in the 3D image space by implementing an iterative localization algorithm and served as the evaluated control points for MRI distortion detection. MRIs and CT images were spatially co-registered using a mutual information algorithm. The inverse transformation matrix was applied to the reference control points and compared with the corresponding MRI-identified ones to evaluate the overall spatial accuracy of the MRI/CT dataset. The mean image distortion correction technique was implemented, and resulting MRI-corrected control points were compared against the corresponding reference ones. For the scanning parameters used, increased MRI distortion (>1mm) was detected at areas distant from the MRI isocenter (>5cm), while median radial distortion was 0.76mm. Detected offsets were slightly higher for the MRI/CT dataset (0.92mm median distortion). The mean image distortion correction improves geometric accuracy, but residual distortion cannot be considered negligible (0.51mm median distortion). For all three datasets studied, a statistically significant positive correlation between detected spatial offsets and their distance from the MRI isocenter was revealed. This work contributes towards the wider adoption of 3T imaging in SRS/SRT treatment planning. The presented methodology can be employed in commissioning and quality assurance programmes of corresponding treatment workflows.

Target localization accuracy in frame‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: Comparison between MR‐only and MR/CT co‐registration approaches

Purpose

In frame‐based Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery two treatment planning workflows are commonly employed; one based solely on magnetic resonance (MR) images and the other based on magnetic resonance/computed tomography (MR/CT) co‐registered images. In both workflows, target localization accuracy (TLA) can be deteriorated due to MR‐related geometric distortions and/or MR/CT co‐registration uncertainties. In this study, the overall TLA following both clinical workflows is evaluated for cases of multiple brain metastases.

Methods

A polymer gel‐filled head phantom, having the Leksell stereotactic headframe attached, was CT‐imaged and irradiated by a GK Perfexion unit. A total of 26 4‐mm shots were delivered at 26 locations directly defined in the Leksell stereotactic space (LSS), inducing adequate contrast in corresponding T2‐weighted (T2w) MR images. Prescribed shot coordinates served as reference locations. An additional MR scan was acquired to implement the “mean image” distortion correction technique. The TLA for each workflow was assessed by comparing the radiation‐induced target locations, identified in MR images, with corresponding reference locations. Using T1w MR and CT images of 15 patients (totaling 81 lesions), TLA in clinical cases was similarly assessed, considering MR‐corrected data as reference. For the MR/CT workflow, both global and region of interest (ROI)‐based MR/CT registration approaches were studied.

Results

In phantom measurements, the MR‐corrected workflow demonstrated unsurpassed TLA (median offset of 0.2 mm) which deteriorated for MR‐only and MR/CT workflows (median offsets of 0.8 and 0.6 mm, respectively). In real‐patient cases, the MR‐only workflow resulted in offsets that exhibit a significant positive correlation with the distance from the MR isocenter, reaching 1.1 mm (median 0.6 mm). Comparable results were obtained for the MR/CT‐global workflow, although a maximum offset of 1.4 mm was detected. TLA was improved with the MR/CT‐ROI workflow resulting in median/maximum offsets of 0.4 mm/1.1 mm.

Conclusions

Subpixel TLA is achievable in all workflows. For the MR/CT workflow, a ROI‐based MR/CT co‐registration approach could considerably increase TLA and should be preferred instead of a global registration.

Mask-Based versus Frame-Based Gamma Knife ICON Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Radiosurgery is performed with a diversity of instruments relying usually either on a stereotactic frame or a mask for patient head fixation. Comfort and safety efficacy of the 2 systems have never been rigorously evaluated and compared.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between February 2016 and January 2017, 58 patients presenting with nonsmall cell lung cancer brain metastases have been treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) with random use of a frame or a mask for fixation were included patients older than 18, with <5 brain metastases (at the exclusion of brainstem and optic pathway's locations) and no earlier history of radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the pain scale assessment (PSA) at the beginning of the GKS procedure.

RESULTS

The PSA at the beginning of the GKS procedure was not different between the 2 groups. The PSA at the day before GKS, before magnetic resonance imaging, just after frame application, and the day after radiosurgery (departure) has shown no difference between the 2 groups. At the end of the radiosurgery itself (just after frame or mask removal) and 1 h after, the mean pain scale was higher in patients treated with the frame (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but 2 patients were not able to tolerate the mask discomfort and had to be treated with frame. Tumor control and morbidity probability were demonstrated to be no difference between the 2 groups in this population of patients with BM not in highly functional area. The median of the extra dose to the body due to the cone-beam computed tomography was 7.5 mGy with a maximum of 35 mGy in patients treated with a mask fixation (null in the others treated with frame). Mask fixation was associated to longer treatment time although the beam on time was not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, with brain oligo-metastases out of critical location, single-dose mask-based GKS can be done with a comfort and a safety efficacy comparable to frame-based GKS. There seems to be no clear patient data that confirm the value of the mask system with regards to comfort.

Single Fraction Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery on the Gamma Knife Icon for Patients With Brain Metastases: Time to Abandon the Frame?

Purpose

The latest version of the Gamma Knife, the Icon, allows for immobilization with a mask in lieu of the traditional frame during stereotactic radiosurgery. There have been some concerns regarding extent of immobilization during single fraction frameless treatment and potential effect on outcomes. As such, we reviewed outcomes in patients with brain metastases treated in a single fraction using either a frame or mask on the Gamma Knife Icon at our institution.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the records of 95 patients with a total of 374 metastases treated between May 2019 and January 2021. Thirty-nine patients (41%) were treated using the Leksell frame with the remainder being immobilized with a mask. The median number of metastatic lesions was 2 (1–20). The median prescription dose was 20 Gy (11.5–24 Gy). Odds ratios were generated to identify predictors of mask use. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival, local failure, and distant failure rates. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias.

Results

Of the 95 patients treated, 88 (93%) had follow-up with a median duration of 5 months (1–18). Frame utilization was more likely with 6 to 10 brain metastases. Median overall survival was not reached and was 70% and 60% at 6 and 12 months for the entire cohort, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival by immobilization method (P = .12). Six patients had local failure in 10 total lesions (3 patients in each group). After propensity matching the 12 month tumor local control was 96% and 85% for framed and frameless cases, respectively (P = .07).

Conclusions

Frameless mask-based stereotactic radiosurgery using the Gamma Knife Icon is feasible and maintains the excellent local control seen with the use of the headframe.

Feasibility and potential advantages using VMAT in SRS metastasis treatments

Background

Utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) has become the technique of choice as opposed to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The aim of this work is to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits in terms of normal tissue (NT) and dose escalation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in SRS metastasis treatment. A VMAT optimization procedure has therefore been developed for internal dose scaling which minimizes planner dependence.

Materials and methods

Five patient-plans incorporating treatment with frame-based SRS with dynamic conformal arc technique (DA) were re-planned for VMAT. The lesions selected were between 4-6 cm³. The same geometry used in the DA plans was maintained for the VMAT cases. A VMAT planning procedure was performed attempting to scale the dose in inner auxiliary volumes, and to explore the potential for dose scaling with this technique. Comparison of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were obtained.

Results

VMAT allows a superior NT sparing plus conformity and dose scaling using the auxiliary volumes. The VMAT results were significantly superior in NT sparing, improving both the V₁₀ and V₁₂ values in all cases, with a 2-3 cm³ saving. In addition, VMAT improves the dose coverage D₉₅ by about 0.5 Gy. The objective of dose escalation was achieved with VMAT with an increment of the Dmean and the Dmedian of about 2 Gy.

Conclusions

This work shows a benefit of VMAT in SRS treatment with significant NT sparing. A VMAT optimization procedure, based on auxiliary inner volumes, has been developed, enabling internal dose escalation.

Frame-Based and Mask-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The Patient Experience, Compared

INTRODUCTION

Noninvasive frameless modalities have become increasingly utilized for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign and malignant pathologies. There is minimal comparison in the literature of frame-based (FB) and mask-based (MB) SRS. With the dual capabilities of the Elekta Gamma Knife® Icon™, we sought to compare patient perceptions of FB and MB SRS with respect to comfort and pain and to examine effects of lesion type on the patient experience of SRS.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, patients who underwent single fraction, fractionated or hypofractionated FB or MB Gamma Knife SRS at our institution were given an 8-question survey about their experience with the procedure immediately after treatment was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients completed the survey with 65 FB and 52 MB SRS treatments. Mean pain for FB SRS (5.64 ± 2.55) was significantly greater than mean pain for MB SRS (0.92 ± 2.24; t114 = 10.46, p < 0.001). Patient comfort during the procedure was also higher for those having MB SRS (p < 0.001). Mixed results were obtained when investigating if benign versus malignant diagnosis affected patient experience of SRS. For the purposes of this study, malignant diagnoses were almost entirely metastatic lesions. Diagnosis played no role on pain levels when all patients were analyzed together. The treatment technique had no effect on patient comfort in patients with benign diagnoses, while patients with malignant diagnoses treated with MB SRS were more likely to be comfortable (p < 0.001). Among patient's receiving FB treatments, diagnosis played no role on patient comfort. When only MB treatments were analyzed, patients were more likely to be comfortable if they had a malignant lesion (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with MB SRS experience the procedure as more comfortable and less painful compared to those treated using a FB modality. Overall, this difference was not affected by a benign versus a malignant diagnosis and the treatment type is more indicative of the patient experience during SRS. A more homogenous sample between modalities and diagnoses and further follow-up with the patient's input on their experience would be beneficial.

Patient perspectives on frame versus mask immobilization for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To assess patient experiences and perspectives following Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using frame versus mask immobilization.

METHODS

Patients who received GK-SRS using both frame and mask immobilization were included in this study. One-on-one semi-structured interviews, led by a third-party expert, were used to gain insight into the patient experience. To reduce memory bias of either immobilization device, patients underwent the interview at their follow-up appointment. Initial assessment of patient transcriptions was completed by one study staff; a second member reviewed transcripts for thematic saturation. All interviews were independently coded for themes to minimize interpretation bias.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were consented; 12 were successfully interviewed (3 lost due to deteriorating health status). Interviews ranged from 30 to 60 min in duration. The most common patient concern regarding the frame was pain (9 patients), while the primary concerns with the mask system were the ability to remain still (6 patients) and claustrophobia (4 patients). Eleven patients chose the mask as their preferred choice in terms of their overall experience. Two themes emerged during the interviews that spoke to patient satisfaction with each process: unexpected pain with frame placement; and tightness experienced while wearing the mask during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

From the patient perspective there was overwhelming agreement that the mask was the preferred choice for GK-SRS. The patient experience could be improved by enhanced education to better prepare patients on what to expect during the frame placement and mask treatment processes.