Treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors in non-metastatic anal cancer: The French nationwide cohort study FFCD-ANABASE

Efficacy and Toxicity of (Chemo)Radiation Therapy in HIV+ Patients with Squamous Cell Anal Cancer, a Subgroup Analysis of the National Multicenter Cohort FFCD-ANABASE

PURPOSE

The influence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on clinical outcomes in patients receiving (chemo)radiation therapy (RT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is debated. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety according to HIV status in patients with SCCA treated with C/RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2015 and April 2020, 488 patients with a known HIV status (17.6% HIV+) were treated with radiation therapy for SCCA and included in the FFCD-ANABASE multicentric prospective cohort. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival, colostomy-free survival, response rate at 4 to 6 months, cancer-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and severe acute and late toxicity were compared between HIV+ and HIV- patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35.8 months. HIV+ patients were younger (P < .01) and predominantly male (P < .01). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was performed in 80.7% of patients, and 80.9% received concurrent chemotherapy. A higher proportion of HIV+ patients received induction chemotherapy compared with HIV- patients. No statistically significant difference in overall treatment time or severe acute and late toxicities was found between HIV+ and HIV- patients. In univariate analyses, OS (HR = 2.1 [CI 95% 1.2;3.5], P = .007), locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.7 [1.1;2.7], P = .02), and colostomy-free survival (HR = 1.7 [1.1;2.6], P = .01) were significantly shorter in HIV+ patients than in HIV- patients. Response rate, cancer-specific survival, and relapse-free survival were not significantly different. The recurrence site was significantly different according to HIV status. In the multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for OS were a World Health Organization performance status of ≥1 for the whole population, as well as HIV+ status for the subgroup of women.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV+ patients treated with chemo-RT for SCCA have poorer clinical outcomes, especially women. No difference was found in toxicity according to HIV status with intensity modulated radiation therapy technique.

Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Assessment After Radiotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus in Patients from the National Multicentric Cohort FFCD-ANABASE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative assessment in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS) after radiation therapy (RT) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and posttherapeutic quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in terms of RFS, CFS, and OS. Methods: We included all consecutive patients from the French multicentric cohort FFCD-ANABASE who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4-6 mo after RT or chemoradiotherapy for a localized SCCA. Qualitative assessments separated patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR. Quantitative parameters were measured on baseline and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations among qualitative assessments, quantitative parameters, and RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Results: Among 1,015 patients treated between January 2015 and April 2020, 388 patients (300 women and 88 men) from 36 centers had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis and after treatment. The median age was 65 y (range, 32-90 y); 147 patients (37.9%) had an early-stage tumor and 241 patients (62.1%) had a locally advanced-stage tumor; 59 patients (15.2%) received RT, and 329 (84.8%) received chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 35.5 mo (95% CI, 32.8-36.6 mo). Patients with CMR had better 3-y RFS, CFS, and OS, at 84.2% (95% CI, 77.8%-88.9%), 84.7% (95% CI, 77.2%-89.3%), and 88.6% (95% CI, 82.5%-92.7%), respectively, than did non-CMR patients, at 42.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-50.6%), 47.9% (95% CI, 38.1%-56.8%), and 63.5 (95% CI, 53.2%-72.1%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Quantitative parameters were available for 154 patients from 3 centers. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with 3-y RFS: baseline SUVmax (primitive tumor [T]) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.1; P = 0.018]), SUVpeak (T) (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = 0.007]), MTV 41% (T) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.023]), MTV 41% (lymph node [N]) (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P < 0.001]), MTV 41% (T + N) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.005]), and posttreatment SUVmax (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.34; P < 0.001]). Conclusion: Treatment response assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT after RT for SCCA has a significant prognostic value.18F-FDG PET/CT could be useful for adapting follow-up, especially for patients with locally advanced-stage tumors. Quantitative parameters could permit identification of patients with a worse prognosis but should be evaluated in further trials.

Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the management of early-stage anal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative analysis of the French cohort FFCD-ANABASE

INTRODUCTION

Early-stage anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) are usually treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with good outcomes. Radiotherapy (RT) alone might be sufficient while reducing toxicity.

METHODS

Patients included in the French prospective FFCD-ANABASE and treated for T1-2N0 ASCC between 2015/01 and 2020/04 were divided into CRT and RT groups. Clinical outcomes and toxicity were reported. Propensity score matching was conducted for 105 pairs of patients.

RESULTS

440 patients were analyzed: 261 (59.3 %) in the CRT group and 179 (40.7 %) in the RT group. The median follow-up was 35.7 months. Patients receiving CRT were younger, had better Performance Status (PS) and larger tumors. No statistical difference was observed for 3-year Disease-free survival (85.3 % vs 83 %, p = 0.28), Overall survival (89.6 % vs 94.8 %, p = 0.69) and Colostomy-free survival (84.5 % vs 87.2 %, p = 0.84) between CRT and RT groups, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Treatment interruptions were significantly more frequent in the CRT group (36.3 % vs 21.9 %, p = 0.0013), resulting in an Overall Treatment Time (OTT) extended by 7 days. Grade 3 CTCAE v4.0 toxicities were more prevalent in the CRT group (46 % vs 19 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy did not significantly improve outcomes for T1-2N0 ASCC in our study, but increased toxicity and OTT.

Reduction of elective lymph node volume in radiotherapy of early anal squamous cell cancer: a comparative study between two Swedish university hospitals

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) in early stages (T1-2N0M0) is treated with chemoradiotherapy with a 3-year overall survival (OS) exceeding 90%. In Swedish guidelines, it has been optional to include the external iliac and presacral lymph node (LN) stations in radiotherapy (RT) treatment fields in early ASCC. Two Swedish hospitals treating ASCC (SU: Sahlgrenska University Hospital; UU: Uppsala University Hospital) have chosen different approaches since 2010.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included consecutive patients with early ASCC (T1-2N0M0) treated between 2010 and 2017 at both sites (SU n = 70; UU n = 46). Data were retrieved from medical records and RT charts.

RESULTS

At SU, the external iliac and presacral LN stations were included in elective LN irradiation in 96.8% (n = 60) and 95.2% (n = 59) patients compared to 2.4% (n = 1) and 29.3% (n = 12) at UU. The mean elective LN volume was 2,313 cc (interquartile range [IQR] 1,951-2,627) in the SU cohort compared to 1,317 cc (IQR 1,192-1,528) in the UU cohort, p < 0.0001. No case of regional LN recurrence was seen in either cohort. Disease specific survival (DSS) at 5 years was 95.7% (confidence interval [CI] 90.1-100.0) in the SU cohort and 97.8% (CI 93.2-100.0) in the UU cohort (p 0.55). OS at 5 years was 84.5% (CI 76.1-93.0) in the SU cohort and 82.6% (CI 69.6-89.1) in the UU cohort (p 0.8).

INTERPRETATION

We found no differences in regional recurrence, DSS or OS between the cohorts treated with different elective LN volumes. In this population-based study, reduction of RT volume in early ASCC did not lead to inferior outcome.

Management of non-metastatic anal cancer in the elderly: ancillary study of the French multicenter prospective cohort FFCD-ANABASE

BACKGROUND

Standard care for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is chemoradiotherapy, data about elderly patients are scarce.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for non-metastatic SCCA from the French multicenter FFCD-ANABASE cohort were included. Two groups were defined according to age: elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75).

RESULTS

Of 1015 patients, 202 (19.9%) were included in the elderly group; median follow-up was 35.5 months. Among the elderly, there were more women (p = 0.015); frailer patients (p < 0.001), fewer smokers (p < 0.001) and fewer HIV-infected (p < 0.001) than in the non-elderly group. Concomitant chemotherapy and inguinal irradiation were less frequent (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04). In the elderly group; 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) were 82.9%, 72.4% and 78.0%, respectively; complete response rate at 4-6 months was 70.3%. There were no differences between groups for all outcomes and toxicity. In multivariate analyses for the elderly, PS ≥ 2 and locally-advanced tumors were significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 3.4 and HR = 2.80), RFS (HR = 2.4 and HR = 3.1) and CFS (HR = 3.8 and HR = 3.0); and treatment interruption with poor RFS (HR = 1.9).

CONCLUSION

In the FFCD-ANABASE cohort, age did not influence tumor and tolerance outcomes of non-metastatic SCCA. Optimal curative treatment should be offered to elderly patients.