1
|
Rondón DS, Lombardo P, Abdelrahman M, Struelens L, Vanhavere F, Bergans N. Object and person tracking systems to enable extremity dosimetry in nuclear medicine using computational methods. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2024; 44:021524. [PMID: 38834035 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad53d5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Nuclear medicine (NM) professionals are potentially exposed to high doses of ionising radiation, particularly in the skin of the hands. Ring dosimeters are used by the workers to ensure extremity doses are kept below the legal limits. However, ring dosimeters are often susceptible to large uncertainties, so it is difficult to ensure a correct measurement using the traditional occupational monitoring methods. An alternative solution is to calculate the absorbed dose by using Monte Carlo simulations. This method could reduce the uncertainty in dose calculation if the exact positions of the worker and the radiation source are represented in these simulations. In this study we present a set of computer vision and artificial intelligence algorithms that allow us to track the exact position of unshielded syringes and the hands of NM workers. We showcase a possible hardware configuration to acquire the necessary input data for the algorithms. And finally, we assess the tracking confidence of our software. The tracking accuracy achieved for the syringe detection was 57% and for the hand detection 98%.
Collapse
|
2
|
Harbron RW, Abdelhalim MA, Ainsbury EA, Eakins JS, Modarai B. Editor's Choice - Estimated Radiation Dose to the Operator During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:178-185. [PMID: 37011855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate operator organ doses from fluoroscopically guided infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, using the detailed exposure information contained in radiation dose structured reports. METHODS Conversion factors relating kerma area product (PKA) to primary operator organ doses were calculated using Monte Carlo methods for 91 beam angles and seven x-ray spectra typical of clinical practice. A computer program was written, which selects the appropriate conversion factor for each exposure listed in a structured report and multiplies it by the respective PKA. This system was used to estimate operator doses for 81 EVAR procedures for which structured reports were available. The impact of different shielding scenarios and variations in operator position was also investigated. RESULTS Without any shielding, the median estimated effective dose was 113 μSv (interquartile range [IQR] 71, 252 μSv). The highest median organ doses were for the colon (154 μSv, IQR 81, 343) and stomach (133 μSv, IQR 76, 307). These dose estimates represent all exposures, including fluoroscopy and non-fluoroscopic digital acquisitions. With minimal shielding provided by 0.25 mm of Pb covering the torso and upper legs, the effective dose was reduced by a factor of around 6. With additional shielding from ceiling and table shields, a 25 to 50 fold reduction in dose is achievable. Estimated doses were highest where the primary beam was pointed directly away from the operator. CONCLUSION The models suggest that with optimal use of shielding, operator doses can be reduced to levels equivalent to one to two days of natural background exposure and well below statutory dose limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Harbron
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Mohamed A Abdelhalim
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, BHF Centre of Excellence at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chaemical and Environmental Threats and Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Jonathan S Eakins
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chaemical and Environmental Threats and Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Bijan Modarai
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, BHF Centre of Excellence at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdelrahman M, Lombardo P, Dabin J, Struelens L, Vanhavere F. Impact of the implementation of the new radiation quantities recommended by ICRU/ICRP for practical use in interventional radiology: a Monte Carlo study. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2023; 43:011513. [PMID: 36720155 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/acb780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) proposed a new set of operational quantities for radiation protection for external radiation in its Report Committee 26 (ICRU95). The new proposal aims to improve the coherence between the operational quantities and the definitions of the protection quantities in the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection set out in 2007 (Ann. ICRP37). It is expected that this change in operational quantities will impact current dosimeter designs. Although for many photon energies, the conversion coefficients from physical field quantities to the new operational quantities will change relatively little, for radiation fields with low energy photon components, such as medical x-ray applications, there will be a significant decrease in the values of the conversion coefficients. This means that the numerical values of the new operational quantities will be much lower for the same radiation field. These values will be closer to the effective dose, but this change can still cause confusion for medical staff. It is important to examine the effect of the new set of dose conversion coefficients on the personal dose in realistic radiation fields. We performed a study to assess the effect of changing the definition of the operational quantity, personal dose equivalent (Hp), in realistic radiation fields in interventional radiology (IR) workplaces. The x-ray tube kilovoltage peak (kVp) in IR ranges between 60 and 120 kV. The medical staff is exposed to the scattered photons which have a wide range of energies depending on the beam configuration and the patient size. The objective of this study is to 'quantitatively' estimate the impact of implementing the new ICRU quantities of Report 95 in IR radiation fields using Monte Carlo simulations. Simulations of 560 different configurations in IR were performed using MCNPX to calculate fluence binned per energy and angle of incidence.HpandHp(10)were then calculated for each configuration using dose conversion coefficients from fluence given by ICRU Reports 95 and 57, respectively. The results show that the mean of the ratio,Hp(10)/Hp, is 1.6 for all simulated scenarios. This reduction will correct the current overestimation of the effective dose and should result in better compliance with the dose limits in IR. However, it may also have negative consequences on the safety culture among the medical staff. Special care will be needed when interpreting these lower doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jérémie Dabin
- SCK CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Computational personal dosimetry at a realistic neutron workplace field. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
5
|
Vanhavere F, Van Hoey O. Advances in personal dosimetry towards real-time dosimetry. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
6
|
O'Connor U, Walsh C, Gorman D, O'Reilly G, Martin Z, Madhavan P, Murphy RT, Szirt R, Almén A, Andersson M, Camp A, Garcia V, Duch MA, Ginjaume M, Abdelrahman M, Lombardo P, Vanhavere F. Feasibility study of computational occupational dosimetry: evaluating a proof-of-concept in an endovascular and interventional cardiology setting. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:041501. [PMID: 36130583 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac9394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Individual monitoring of radiation workers is essential to ensure compliance with legal dose limits and to ensure that doses are As Low As Reasonably Achievable. However, large uncertainties still exist in personal dosimetry and there are issues with compliance and incorrect wearing of dosimeters. The objective of the PODIUM (Personal Online Dosimetry Using Computational Methods) project was to improve personal dosimetry by an innovative approach: the development of an online dosimetry application based on computer simulations without the use of physical dosimeters. Occupational doses were calculated based on the use of camera tracking devices, flexible individualised phantoms and data from the radiation source. When combined with fast Monte Carlo simulation codes, the aim was to perform personal dosimetry in real-time. A key component of the PODIUM project was to assess and validate the methodology in interventional radiology workplaces where improvements in dosimetry are needed. This paper describes the feasibility of implementing the PODIUM approach in a clinical setting. Validation was carried out using dosimeters worn by Vascular Surgeons and Interventional Cardiologists during patient procedures at a hospital in Ireland. Our preliminary results from this feasibility study show acceptable differences of the order of 40% between calculated and measured staff doses, in terms of the personal dose equivalent quantity Hp(10), however there is a greater deviation for more complex cases and improvements are needed. The challenges of using the system in busy interventional rooms have informed the future needs and applicability of PODIUM. The availability of an online personal dosimetry application has the potential to overcome problems that arise from the use of current dosimeters. In addition, it should increase awareness of radiation protection among staff. Some limitations remain and a second phase of development would be required to bring the PODIUM method into operation in a hospital setting. However, an early prototype system has been tested in a clinical setting and the results from this two-year proof-of-concept PODIUM project are very promising for future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U O'Connor
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Walsh
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Gorman
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G O'Reilly
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Z Martin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Madhavan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R T Murphy
- Department of Cardiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R Szirt
- Department of Cardiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Almén
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Andersson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - A Camp
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Garcia
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Duch
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Ginjaume
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Abdelrahman
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang, Mol, Belgium
| | - P Lombardo
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang, Mol, Belgium
| | - F Vanhavere
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang, Mol, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
What Is Worth Knowing in Interventional Practices about Medical Staff Radiation Exposure Monitoring: A Review of Recent Outcomes of EURADOS Working Group 12. ENVIRONMENTS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/environments9040053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
EURADOS (European Radiation Dosimetry Group) Working Group 12 (WG12) SG1 activities are aimed at occupational radiation protection and individual monitoring in X-ray and nuclear medicine practices. In recent years, many studies have been carried out in these fields, especially for interventional radiology and cardiology workplaces (IC/IR). The complexity of the exposure conditions of the medical staff during interventional practices makes the radiation protection and monitoring of the exposed workers a challenging task. The scope of the present work is to review some of the main results obtained within WG12 activities about scattered field characterization and personal dosimetry that could be very useful in increasing the quality of radiation protection of the personnel, safety, and awareness of radiation risk. Two papers on Monte Carlo modelling of interventional theater and three papers on active personal dosimeters (APDs) for personnel monitoring were considered in the review. More specifically, Monte Carlo simulation was used as the main tool to characterize the levels of exposure of the medical staff, allowing to determine how beam energy and direction can have an impact on the doses received by the operators. Indeed, the simulations provided information about the exposure of the operator’s head, and the study concluded with the determination of an eye-lens protection factor when protection goggles and a ceiling shielding are used. Moreover, the review included the results of studies on active personal dosimeters, their use in IC/IR workplaces, and how they respond to calibration fields, with X-ray standard and pulsed beams. It was shown that APDs are insensitive to backscatter radiation, but some of them could not respond correctly to the very intense pulsed fields (as those next to the patient in interventional practices). The measurements during interventional procedures showed the potential capability of the employment of APDs in hospitals.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abdelrahman M, Lombardo P, Camp A, Duch MA, Phillips C, Seret A, Vanhavere F. A parametric study of occupational radiation dose in interventional radiology by Monte-Carlo simulations. Phys Med 2020; 78:58-70. [PMID: 32947085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a parametric study on the occupational exposure in interventional radiology to explore the influence of various variables on the staff doses. These variables include the angiography beam settings: x-ray peak voltage (kVp), added copper filtration, field diameter, beam projection and source to detector distance. The study was performed using Monte-Carlo simulations with MCNPX for more than 5600 combinations of parameters that account for different clinical situations. Additionally, the analysis of the results was performed using both multiple and random forest regression to build a predictive model and to quantify the importance of each variable when the variables simultaneously change. Primary and secondary projections were found to have the most effect on the scatter fraction that reaches the operator followed by the effect of changing the x-ray beam quality. The effect of changing the source to image intensifier distance had the lowest effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Abdelrahman
- SCKCEN: the Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang 200, Mol 2400, Belgium; ULiège: Cyclotron Research Centre, B30, 8 Allée du Six Août, Liège 4000, Belgium.
| | - Pasquale Lombardo
- SCKCEN: the Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang 200, Mol 2400, Belgium
| | - Anna Camp
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria A Duch
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christophe Phillips
- ULiège: Cyclotron Research Centre, B30, 8 Allée du Six Août, Liège 4000, Belgium
| | - Alain Seret
- ULiège: Cyclotron Research Centre, B30, 8 Allée du Six Août, Liège 4000, Belgium
| | - Filip Vanhavere
- SCKCEN: the Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang 200, Mol 2400, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|