Laser terapia no controle da mucosite oral: um estudo de metanálise

Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation for Oral Mucositis Prevention and Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

We report on the cost-effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) derived from the cytotoxic effects of antineoplastic therapy.

METHODS

This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and OpenGrey. Articles published before 23 July 2024, were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and a placebo group compared to an intervention group (PBM) were selected. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and was rated as moderate.

RESULTS

A total of 3 RCTs and 229 patients were included. PBM may represent an additional cost in the short term, but the incremental expenses derived from the cytotoxic effects of antineoplastic therapy are greater in the medium-long term. The intervention group (PBM) showed a lower incidence of severe OM compared to the control group (placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

PBM is a cost-effective long-term treatment, effective in preventing severe OM and improving the quality of life of cancer patients. More RCTs following the same standardized protocols are needed (registration CDR42024498825).

Photobiomodulation therapy on chemo- and radiotherapy induced oral conditions: an umbrella review

OBJECTIVES

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a laser-based therapy used to promote tissue repair, reduce inflammation and pain, and has been extensively studied in chemo- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). This review examines the level of evidence of systematic reviews (SRs) that have investigated PBM in such cases of OM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SRs evaluating PBM for both the treatment and prevention of OM in patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and published before November 30, 2023, on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, TRIP and Open Grey databases were eligible for inclusion. We assessed the level of methodological and meta-analytic procedures.

RESULTS

Of the 1201 SRs, 21 that met the inclusion criteria were included. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Assessing the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2), and the majority was of critically low quality (n = 15, 71.4%) with only 28.5% of low quality. A total of 40 meta-analytic estimates were obtained and analyzed. Approximately 87.5% of the meta-analysis were significant (n = 33), but only one meta-analyses had a strength of "highly suggestive", while the rest were classified as "weak". When analyzing the overlap values, the covered area was 12.14% and the corrected covered area was 7.75%, indicating a moderate overlap. Only 4 SRs had a very high overlap and one had a high overlap.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of PBM in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced OM is supported by low to critically low quality SRs and meta-analysis of low strength. This review highlights important areas that need to be addressed in future research on this topic.

REGISTRATION

CRD42023484013 (PROSPERO).

Management of Cancer Therapy-Induced Oral Mucositis Using Photobiomodulation Therapy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Objective: To systematically summarize the evidence for photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing cancer treatment. An electronic search was conducted in 8 databases and grey literature. Background: PBMT is recommended for the management of OM resulting from cancer treatment, with several systematic reviews (SRs) being published in recent years on this topic. Methods: Only SRs with outcomes from clinical trials were included, with no language or year restriction. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the SRs. Results: Five thousand eight hundred fifty-six references were found, and 16 were selected for this review. OM prevention and treatment were favorable for PBMT in most studies, with a significant reduction in OM severity. Most studies obtained moderate confidence. Conclusions: PBMT represents an effective strategy in the management of OM, and this evidence is supported by studies with acceptable methodological quality.

Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation and Oral Cryotherapy on Oral Mucositis Among Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy Conditioning Prior to Hematological Stem Cell Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

This review evaluated the best available evidence concerning the effectiveness of photobiomodulation compared to oral cryotherapy in oral-mucositis prevention among patients with hematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT) receiving chemo-conditioning.

DATA SOURCES

An extensive search for published and unpublished studies was conducted in 11 electronic databases and reference lists. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two reviewers independently screened relevant studies for eligibility, extracted data using a standardized data collection form, and appraised data using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analyses using a random-effect model was performed using Review Manager software. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the differential effect of interventions across subgroups and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Meta-analyses included 18 RCTs (involving 1,018 patients). Both photobiomodulation and cryotherapy were effective in reducing oral-mucositis severity, severe oral-mucositis incidence, duration, and pain with small to large effect sizes. No significant differences were detected between photobiomodulation and cryotherapy across all outcomes. Subgroup analyses showed significant differences for chemo-conditioning regimens. The overall Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation quality of evidence was low.

CONCLUSION

Both photobiomodulation and cryotherapy were effective nonpharmacological oral-mucositis prophylaxis and analgesia, with no significant difference in effectiveness. Chemo-conditioning regimens may influence their effectiveness. Future RCTs may directly compare the effectiveness of photobiomodulation and cryotherapy on the HSCT patients. Rigorous cost-effectiveness studies are also required.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Photobiomodulation and cryotherapy can be offered to HSCT patients in clinical settings. A clinical guideline of both interventions can be also developed.

Efficacy of Topical Intervention for Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical interventions used for recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Materials and Methods: This network meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We searched four electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase, for randomized controlled trials reporting efficacy and safety data on topical interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis. We performed a quality evaluation using a methodology based on the Cochrane Handbook. Two authors independently extracted data on healing effect, size reduction effect, symptom reduction effect, recurrence and safety assessment. Network meta-analysis was then performed using ADDIS and RevMan. Results: A total of 72 trials (5272 subjects) involving 29 topical interventions were included. Honey, lnsulin liposome gel, laser, amlexanox, glycyrrhiza and triamcinolone had better efficacy performance. Probiotics and chlorhexidine helped to prolong ulcer intervals and reduce recurrence. Doxycycline and penicillin had a high risk of adverse events. Hematologic evaluation showed no preference. The rank possibility of size-reducing effect and symptom-reducing effect supported the short-term effect of laser and the long-term effect of probiotics. Conclusions: We recommend the use of laser as a short-term intervention during the exacerbation phase of RAS and probiotics as a long-term intervention during the exacerbation and remission phases of RAS.

Is Low-level Laser Therapy a Candidate to Be a Good Alternative in the Treatment of Mucositis in Childhood Leukemia?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common side effect of systemic chemotherapy (CT) in cancer patients. The aim was to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of CT-induced OM children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in 40 pediatric patients 3 to 18 years of age, who were hospitalized for the diagnosis of leukemia and underwent CT between June 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. They were randomly divided into 2 groups with 20 cases in each group. The LLLT group was treated with GaAlAs diode laser (l): 830 nm (infrared), power: 150 mW, dose: 4.5 J/cm2 and the control group underwent bicarbonate treatment. Patients received intervention for 3 days. The grade of OM was clinically assessed by the World Health Organization (WHO) Common Toxicity Criteria Scale. Visual Analog Scale was used on the same days with OM grade to evaluate the pain status.

RESULTS

While there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of OM grade at the beginning of the treatment and on the first, second, fourth, and 11th days of the treatment, the average OM grade of the LLLT group was found to be statistically significantly lower on the third, fifth, sixth, and seventh days of the treatment. The Visual Analog Scale score of the LLLT group was statistically significantly lower compared with the control group at all examinations starting from the first day of treatment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of oral OM that occurs in children after CT, both standard care and LLLT treatment improve the grade and pain of OM.

Medicinal plants used for the treatment of mucositis induced by oncotherapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to identify effective medicinal plants for the treatment of mucositis induced by oncotherapy.

METHODS

The clinical question was the following: "Which medicinal plants are effective in the treatment of oral mucositis induced by cancer treatment?" (PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, and SciELO). The keywords were the following: phytotherapy OR "herbal drug" OR "plant extract" OR plant OR "medicinal plant" OR pharmacognosy OR ethnobotany OR ethnomedicine OR ethnopharmacology OR "flower essences" OR "natural product" AND mucositis OR mucositides OR stomatitis OR stomatitides OR "oral ulcer" AND chemotherapy OR radiotherapy OR immunotherapy OR cancer OR neoplasm OR neoplasm OR tumor OR tumor. The inclusion criteria for the selection of articles were the type of study design (clinical trials) and the studied population (cancer patients presenting lesions of oral mucositis having undergone treatment with medicinal plants).

RESULTS

After evaluation of the works, 24 of 893 articles were selected. Matricaria chamomilla (chamomilla) presented promising results, such as a reduction in severity and lesion incidence with improved pain symptomatology. The plant extracts Isatis indigótica, Olea europaea, Calendula officinalis, A. digitatae, and M. sylvestris improved the lesions. Mucotrol™ and QRLYD herbal products improved the degree of severity of the lesions, while SAMITAL® and MUCOSYTE allowed for greater pain control.

CONCLUSION

The complementary treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients, with analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions with lower side effects, is an alternative for healthcare professionals.

Effects of thermal therapy combined with blue light-emitting diode irradiation on trimellitic anhydride-induced acute contact hypersensitivity mouse model

BACKGROUD

The biological effect of phototherapy, which involves using visible light for disease treatment, has attracted recent attention, especially in dermatological practice. Light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation increases dermal collagen level and reduces inflammation. It has been suggested that thermal therapy and LED irradiation can modulate inflammatory processes. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effects of thermal therapy and LED irradiation.

OBJECTIVE

This study was to determine the anti-inflammatory effect of thermal therapy combined with LED irradiation on trimellitic anhydride (TMA)-induced acute contact hypersensitivity (CHS) mouse model.

METHODS

Twenty-four BALB/c mice were randomly divided into the following groups: Vehicle group, TMA group, TMA + alternating thermal therapy group (Alternating group), and TMA + alternating + LED group (LED group). Ear swelling was measured based on the thickness of ear before and after each TMA challenge. Vascular permeability was evaluated by the extravasation of Evans blue dye. Serum IgE level, Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines, and related transcription factors were measured using ELISA kits, and histological examination was illustrated in ear tissue.

RESULTS

The LED group showed reduction in ear swelling response, vascular permeability, serum IgE levels, Th2/Th17 cytokine levels, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Moreover, the LED group showed increased Th1 cytokine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that thermal therapy combined with LED irradiation alleviated TMA-induced acute CHS in the mouse model. Thermal therapy and phototherapy should be considered as a novel therapeutic tool for the treatment of skin inflammation.

Photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBM-T) can penetrate soft tissues and exert analgesic and healing effects, and is thus a promising alternative for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PBM-T, alone or combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT), for treatment of OM in cancer patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were recruited from the Oncology Department of a teaching hospital. Patients underwent grading of OM and were divided into two groups (n = 28 each): PBM-T and PBM-T + PDT. In the PBM-T group, low-level laser was applied to 61 points in the oral cavity, once weekly for 4 weeks (wavelength 660 nm, power 100 mW, energy density 142 J/cm², spot energy 4 J, irradiation time 40 s). In the PBM-T + PDT group, in addition to PBM-T as described above, patients rinsed with 20 ml of photosensitizing mouthwash (curcumin 1.5 g/L) and the oral cavity was irradiated with a blue (468 nm) LED for 5 min.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in OM grade were observed after application of PBM-T or PBM-T + PDT (p < 0.0001). PBM-T + PDT resulted in a shorter time to resolution of lesions compared to PBM-T alone (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

PBM-T, alone or combined with PDT, can be used for the treatment of OM. PDT + PBM-T in particular accelerated the OM healing process, reducing time to lesion remission from 15 to 11 days.

Chemotherapy in Pediatric Oncology Patients and the Occurrence of Oral Mucositis

BACKGROUND

It is known that chemotherapeutic agents are not equally stomatotoxic and oral cavity lesions are the most frequent complications encountered in antineoplastic chemotherapy.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of severe oral mucositis during a chemotherapy treatment and to identify its relationship with the chemotherapeutic class used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a longitudinal, prospective, and observational study that used an intensive direct observation technique for assessing the oral clinical conditions and the chemotherapy treatment administered to 105 patients (both children and adolescents).

RESULTS

Severe oral mucositis occurred in all the 10 weeks of evaluation (ranging from 16.2 to 31.4%) and the association between the type of chemotherapy and the occurrence of severe oral mucositis is recorded only in the 6th week, with the chance to develop severe oral mucositis being 3.07 (3.85-2.29) times higher in patients underwent chemotherapy with antimetabolites than in those who have not used chemotherapy (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the chemotherapeutic agents most related to severe oral mucositis and to the interruption in chemotherapy are those of the class of antimetabolites, especially the methotrexate and the Ara C.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Ribeiro ILA, de Andrade Lima Neto E, et al. Chemotherapy in Pediatric Oncology Patients and the Occurrence of Oral Mucositis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(4):261-267.

Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Oral Mucositis

Introduction: Oral mucositis (OM) is an unavoidable condition of the oral cavity that accompanies chemotherapy for various malignant cases. Chemotherapy-induced oral Mucositis (COM) is a frequent complication due to mucotoxic drugs and is known to deteriorate the general health significantly, while negatively affecting the quality of life (QOL). Studies have reported that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) promotes the tissue healing. The objective of the present study was to explore the efficacy of gallium-arsenide (GaAs) laser in treating COM and its impact on inflammatory cytokine levels in patients receiving chemotherapy for various malignancies. Methods: A total of 80 patients with COM received LLLT 6 days/week. OM was graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO) grading scale. The outcome parameters were the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) measured before, during and after administration of LLLT. Results: After LLLT, a significant decrease was found in the mean values of mucositis grade from 2.35 ± 0.695 to 1.13 ± 0.333 after (P < 0.001). A significant reduction in the level of TNF-α was found after LLLT among breast cancer patients (P = 0.0045), but not in head and neck cancer and lymphoma patients. A significant reduction was also found in IL-6 level after treatment among head and neck and breast cancer patients (P = 0.0307 and 0.019, respectively). Conclusion: The use of GaAs LLLT in treating COM in patients with various malignancies is well tolerated by patients, it results in improvement of mucositis, however; mechanism of action does not seem to be completely linked to the change of pro or anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Effects of Matricaria Recutita (L.) in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis

Objective

The objective of this study was to review the effects of the Matricaria recutita (L.) in the treatment of oral mucositis.

Methodology

The online search was performed in the period from June 2016 to April 2018 by means of databases LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), and MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online). The consultation was restricted to the years 1991 to 2018 with the aim of elucidating the effects of Matricaria recutita in the treatment of oral mucositis.

Results

The final sample consisted of 21 studies, of which 10 were developed in animals and 11 in humans, published from 1991 to 2017, with a total sample of 644 patients. The total number of patients treated with Matricaria included in 11 studies was 364, while in the control groups the total number was 280. In experimental studies, animal models used were rats and the sample size ranged between 36 and 105 animals submitted to the induction of oral mucositis, where 4 studies used an intraperitoneal injection of 5-fluorouracil, while 7 induced lesion in the mucosa. From the data collected, it should be noted that both studies with humans and with animals showed significant effects. In this way, there is strong evidence for the discussion on the therapy; however, it should be noted that more studies are developed in order to clarify the most appropriate protocol for the prevention and treatment of injuries.

Conclusion

According to the results found in this study, Matricaria recutita appeared to be a promising alternative for the treatment of oral mucositis. However, due to the great variability in the various types of intervention, more controlled double-blind randomized clinical studies are necessary to ensure the best protocol for treating oral mucositis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients

Oral mucositis is one of the most frequent complications after chemotherapy, occurring in approximately 52 to 80% of children receiving treatment for cancer. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of low-energy laser could reduce the grade of oral mucositis and alleviate the symptoms. In 2014, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology has recommended low-level laser therapy in prevention of mucositis for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients because of its beneficial effects in majority of recent studies. However, the recommendation was made for adult patients, not pediatric patients. Data about the effect of low-level laser therapy in pediatric patients is limited. This study aims to synthesize the available clinical evidences on the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Data on occurrence, duration, and severity of oral mucositis were collected. All randomized controlled studies and clinical controlled studies comparing LLLT to routine qualified prevention or treatment during or after chemotherapy were critically appraised and analyzed. We found 8 qualified clinical trials with a total of 373 pediatric patients; the methodological quality was acceptable. After prophylactic LLLT, the odds ratio for developing OM was significantly lower compared with placebo(OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87, P = 0.01), the odds ratio for developing grade III OM or worse was statistically significantly lower compared with placebo (OR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.10, 0.90), P = 0.03), and the OM severity was statistically significantly lower compared with placebo (SMD = - 0.56, 95% CI (- 0.98, - 0.14), P = 0.009). For therapeutic LLLT, the OM severity was significantly reduced compared to routine care (SMD = - 1.18, 95% CI (- 1.52, - 0.84), P < 0.00001). Oral pain was also reduced after LLLT over routine care (MD = - 0.73, 95% CI (- 1.36, - 0.11), P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic LLLT reduces mucositis and severe mucositis and decreases the average severity of oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients with cancer. Therapeutic LLLT also reduces the average severity of oral mucositis and oral pain. Further research should investigate the optimal parameter of LLLT in pediatric and young patients, and studies with higher methodological quality should be performed. What is known: • Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was recommended by Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology; however, evidences about LLLT on oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients were insufficient and lack supportive synthesized data. • Recently, there have been several new RCTs or CCTs for pediatric patients or young adults. What is new: • Prophylactic LLLT reduces the occurrence of mucositis and severe mucositis and decreases the average severity of oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients. • Therapeutic LLLT reduces the average severity of oral mucositis and oral pain.

Impacto da laserterapia na qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos portadores de mucosite oral

Resumo Introdução O uso da laserterapia em pacientes oncológicos com mucosite oral tem efeitos biológicos por meio de processos fotofísicos e bioquímicos que aumentam o metabolismo celular, estimulando a atividade mitocondrial, atuando como analgésicos, anti-inflamatórios e reparadores da lesão da mucosa. Objetivo Averiguar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes com mucosite oral induzida pelos tratamentos antineoplásicos previamente à aplicação de laserterapia e posterior à regressão das lesões orais. Metodologia Trata-se de um ensaio quase-experimental com 18 pacientes oncológicos em atendimento hospitalar que desenvolveram mucosite oral. Utilizou-se um questionário sociodemográfico e o questionário de Qualidade de Vida (UW-QOL) aplicado antes das sessões com laser de baixa potência e após a regressão das lesões. Os testes estatísticos utilizados foram o teste t de Student e o teste Quiquadrado, admitindo ser significativo o p<0,05. Resultado A faixa etária mais prevalente foi entre 65 e 74 anos, etnia branca, sexo masculino, casado, frequentou o ensino fundamental, usuários do SUS e moradores de cidades diversas. O diagnóstico oncológico mais frequente foi a Leucemia aguda, sendo a quimioterapia o tratamento em 100% dos casos e em 50%, a radioterapia. A média dos escores de qualidade de vida dos pacientes foi 456,2, anterior ao início do tratamento com laserterapia, e 678,3, posterior à intervenção. Conclusão A qualidade de vida melhorou após as sessões de laserterapia, sendo que as mudanças mais significativas ocorreram nos domínios ligados à dor, aparência, deglutição, mastigação, fala, paladar e salivação, sendo o laser de baixa potência uma ferramenta adequada no manejo da mucosite oral.