Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme

Important parameters affecting quality of vitrified donor oocytes

For group of 281 oocytes obtained from 43 stimulated donors and cryopreserved by vitrification protocol using Cryotop and Kitazato medium we determined important parameters of oocytes collection and vitrification processes which strongly affect the probability that warmed oocytes will produce high-quality embryos for transfer. The probability to obtain high-quality embryos for transfer from vitrified and warmed oocytes was highest when two conditions were fulfilled: 1. oocytes were incubated before vitrification for 7-10 h and 2. stimulated ovaries of donors in one cycle produced a smaller number of oocytes (<7 oocytes from one donor per stimulated cycle). The probable reasons for these observations were: 1. early vitrification (less than 7 h) before final oocyte metaphase II maturation negatively affected the crucial process of post-warm remodelling of spindles and chromosomes, which reduced the fertilization and utilization rates, 2. the evaluated vitrification protocol amplifies negative impact of membrane defects of oocytes of those cohorts containing more than 6 oocytes - freezing places great demands on the integrity and elasticity of the cell membranes. The fact that cryopreservation influences a complex state of oocytes was confirmed by confocal microscopy.

High-security closed devices are efficient and safe to protect human oocytes from potential risk of viral contamination during vitrification and storage especially in the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

The main purpose and research question of the study are to compare the efficacy of high-security closed versus open devices for human oocytes' vitrification.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was conducted. A total of 737 patients attending the Infertility and IVF Unit at S.Orsola University Hospital (Italy) between October 2015 and April 2020 were randomly assigned to two groups. A total of 368 patients were assigned to group 1 (High-Security Vitrification™ - HSV) and 369 to group 2 (Cryotop® open system). Oocyte survival, fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed on survival rate (70.3% vs. 73.3%), fertilization rate (70.8% vs. 74.9%), cleavage rate (90.6% vs. 90.3%), pregnancy/transfer ratio (32.0% vs. 31.8%), implantation rate (19.7% vs. 19.9%), nor miscarriage rates (22.1% vs. 21.5%) between the two groups. Women's mean age in group 1 (36.18 ± 3.92) and group 2 (35.88 ± 3.88) was not significantly different (P = .297). A total of 4029 oocytes were vitrified (1980 and 2049 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 2564 were warmed (1469 and 1095 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 1386 morphologically eligible oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (792 and 594 respectively, P = .304).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the replacement of the open vitrification system by a closed one has no impact on in vitro and in vivo survival, development, pregnancy and implantation rate. Furthermore, to ensure safety, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, the use of the closed device eliminates the potential samples' contamination during vitrification and storage.

Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol

STUDY QUESTION

Can two different methods for oocyte vitrification, one using an open tool and the other a closed tool, result in similar oocyte survival rates?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The oocyte survival rate was found to be higher in the closed method.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Open vitrification is performed routinely in oocyte donation cycles. Closed oocyte vitrification may result in slower cooling rates and thus it is less used, even though it has been recommended in order to avoid the risk of cross-contamination between material from different patients.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a prospective cohort study with sibling oocytes carried out in a fertility center between July 2014 and January 2016. The study included 83 oocyte donors each providing a minimum of 12 mature oocytes (metaphase II: MII) at oocyte retrieval. Oocyte survival rate and fertilization rate, as well as reproductive outcomes (biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates) per embryo transfer and also cumulatively between the two methods were compared by Chi2 tests.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Donor oocytes were denuded and six MII oocytes from each donor were vitrified using an open method and later assigned to one recipient, while another six MII oocytes were vitrified using a closed method and assigned to a different recipient (paired analysis). ICSI was used in all cases and embryo transfer was performed on Day 2-3 in all cases.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Oocyte donors were 24.8 years old on average (SD 4.7). Recipient age (average 41.2 years, SD 4.7) and BMI (mean 23.8 kg/m2, SD 4.0) were similar between recipient groups. Oocytes vitrified using the closed method had higher survival rate (94.5% versus 88.9%, P = 0.002), but lower fertilization rate (57.1% versus 69.8%, P < 0.001) compared to the open method. The number of fresh embryos transferred in the two groups was 1.8 on average (SD 0.4). Biochemical (45% closed versus 50% open), clinical (40% versus 50%) and ongoing (37.5% versus 42.5%) pregnancy rates were not different between groups (P > 0.05) and neither were live birth rates (37.5% versus 42.5%, P > 0.05). Cumulative reproductive results (obtained after the transfer of all the embryos) were also similar between groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The participants of this study were oocyte donors, i.e. young women in good health, and care should be exerted in extending our results to other populations such as infertility patients, oncofertility patients and women freezing oocytes to delay childbearing.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results suggest that, in spite of different survival and fertilization rates, closed and open oocyte vitrification methods should offer similar reproductive outcomes up to cumulative live birth rates.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The authors report no conflict of interest. Vitrolife provided the media and the closed method tool needed for the study at no cost.

Closed vitrification system and egg donation: Predictive factors of oocyte survival and pregnancy

Although many studies have demonstrated the superiority of ultra-fast freezing compared with slow freezing, the debate is still ongoing concerning the best type of vitrification method: direct exposure to liquid nitrogen (i.e., open systems), or sterile system without contact with liquid nitrogen (i.e., closed systems). The aims of this study were to share our experience on closed vitrification systems in the framework of our egg donation programme with fully asynchronous cycles, and to identify predictive factors of successful outcome in this context. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the number of vitrified oocytes was the only factor predictive of the oocyte survival rate and of clinical pregnancy. The addition of one vitrified oocyte increased by 15 % the odds of oocyte survival. When the oocyte survival rate was considered as a continuous variable, the following results were obtained: 7 % of clinical pregnancy probability for 50 % survival rate, 15 % for 75 % survival rate, and 32 % for 100 % survival rate. The rates of oocyte survival and fertilization, embryo implantation, and clinical pregnancy were in agreement with the recommended values established by ALPHA Scientists in Reproductive Medicine in 2012. On the basis of these results, and according to the European directives on safety, we validate the routine use of closed oocyte vitrification systems for egg donation programmes. These results must be confirmed in larger samples before extrapolation to all patient types.

Upper and lower genital tract Zika virus screening in a large cohort of reproductive-age women during the Americas epidemic

RESEARCH QUESTION

To determine whether there is a risk of localized Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in the upper genital tract, specifically the oocytes, follicular fluids and endometrium, in exposed and/or recently infected reproductive-age women. ZIKV is an Aedes mosquito-borne Flavivirus that can lead to birth defects and to developmental anomalies when it infects pregnant women.

DESIGN

Controlled observational clinical study following 179 female patients undergoing oocyte vitrification cycles in an academic fertility centre during the ZIKV epidemic in the French territories of the Americas. At the time, the French Ministry of Health issued a ban on medically-induced pregnancies. Oocyte vitrification cycles were the only means of preserving fertility options and ensuring Zika-free oocyte cryopreservation for currently exposed and/or recently infected patients. Samples of serum, urine, lower genital tract, endometrium, follicular fluid and immature oocytes were tested for ZIKV RNA (vRNA) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Serological analysis for ZIKV antibodies was performed in succession for the duration of the study. The follow-up protocol was set up for more than 6 months post-exposure or post-onset.

RESULTS

No vRNA was detected in the various samples from exposed patients. Furthermore, no vRNA was found in the upper genital tracts of women with a recent (3 months) history of acute infection.

CONCLUSION

These findings represent evidence of a lack of vRNA persistence in the reproductive tract in ZIKV exposed and/or recently infected reproductive-age women and could help simplify current guidelines.

Oocyte freezing: reproductive panacea or false hope of family?

Advanced technology now allows young women to freeze and store oocytes with a realistic chance of future pregnancy. Vitrification has revolutionized oocyte preservation, with comparable pregnancy rates to fresh oocyte use. Traditionally used for women who were about to undergo sterilizing oncology treatment, now the opportunity has been extended for 'social freezing'. A steady rise in all women accessing freezing continues. Despite this, there is a lack of understanding of natural fertility and the impact of age on pregnancy outcomes. The optimum time for freezing is before a woman reaches her late 30s, which unfortunately is not reflected in those accessing egg freezing. The underlying message prevails that planning for fertility is best done early, whether that be by physical completion of family size or storing oocytes before the passage of time and age prevents it.

Pre-clinical validation of a closed surface system (Cryotop SC) for the vitrification of oocytes and embryos in the mouse model

Vitrification is currently a well-established technique for the cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. It can be achieved either by direct (open systems) or indirect (closed systems) contact with liquid nitrogen. While there is not a direct evidence of disease transmission by transferred cryopreserved embryos, it was experimentally demonstrated that cross-contamination between liquid nitrogen and embryos may occur, and thus, the use of closed devices has been recommended to avoid the risk of contamination. Unfortunately, closed systems may result in lower cooling rates compared to open systems, due to the thermal insulation of the samples, which may cause ice crystal formation resulting in impaired results. In our study, we aimed to validate a newly developed vitrification device (Cryotop SC) that has been specifically designed for being used as a closed system. The cooling and warming rates calculated for the closed system were 5.254 °C/min and 43.522 °C/min, respectively. Results obtained with the closed system were equivalent to those with the classic Cryotop (open system), with survival rates in oocytes close to 100%. Similarly, the potential of the survived oocytes to develop up to good quality blastocysts after parthenogenetic activation between both groups was statistically equivalent. Assessment of the meiotic spindle and chromosome distribution by fluorescence microscopy in vitrified oocytes showed alike morphologies between the open and closed system. No differences were found either between the both systems in terms of survival rates of one-cell stage embryos or blastocysts, as well as, in the potential of the vitrified/warmed blastocysts to develop to full-term after transferred to surrogate females.

Why all women should freeze their eggs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of oocyte cryopreservation via vitrification has increased lately, becoming a common strategy in many IVF centers. This review summarizes the current state of oocyte vitrification, by analyzing the most recent reports on its use in IVF as part of infertile treatment and its contribution to elective fertility preservation (EFP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Oocyte vitrification has become helpful for managing different clinical situations currently providing similar results to fresh oocytes. Owing to satisfactory results, oocyte vitrification is being offered to healthy women to extend their reproductive options (EFP). Although little is known about outcomes in this specific population, new evidence is starting to emerge. Currently, most women are motivated by age and lack of partner. Age is strongly related to the probability of having a child with better chances when they do EFP younger than 35. In contrast to the biological efficiency, the majority of studies show that EFP is more cost-effective at 37-38 years.

SUMMARY

Oocyte vitrification is an efficient tool which can be helpful in managing the IVF cycle. Fertility preservation providers should inform women about their specific probabilities according to their age at vitrification, making emphasis in the fact that egg freezing does not guarantee success, but increases the possibilities of having a biological child in the future.

Risk of Contamination of Gametes and Embryos during Cryopreservation and Measures to Prevent Cross-Contamination

The introduction and widespread application of vitrification are one of the most important achievements in human assisted reproduction techniques (ART) of the past decade despite controversy and unclarified issues, mostly related to concerns about disease transmission. Guidance documents published by US Food and Drug Administration, which focused on the safety of tissue/organ donations during Zika virus spread in 2016, as well as some reports of virus, bacteria, and fungi survival to cryogenic temperatures, highlighted the need for a review of the way how potentially infectious material is handled and stored in ART-related procedures. It was experimentally demonstrated that cross-contamination between liquid nitrogen (LN₂) and embryos may occur when infectious agents are present in LN₂ and oocytes/embryos are not protected by a hermetically sealed device. Thus, this review summarizes pertinent data and opinions regarding the potential hazard of infectious transmission through cryopreserved and banked reproductive cells and tissues in LN₂. Special attention is given to the survival of pathogens in LN₂, the risk of cross-contamination, vitrification methods, sterility of LN₂, and the risks associated with the use of straws, cryovials, and storage dewars.

Outcomes of immature oocytes collected from ovarian tissue for cryopreservation in adult and prepubertal patients

The efficiency of oocyte in-vitro maturation (IVM) and vitrification procedures after ex-vivo collection from ovarian tissue were assessed according to patient age, number of retrieved oocytes and tissue transport conditions. The combined procedure was performed in 136 patients: 130 adults (mean 27.6 ± 5.6 years) and six prepubertal girls (mean 8.7 ± 2.3 years). A higher mean number of oocytes were collected in girls compared with adults (11.5 ± 8.0 versus 3.8 ± 4.2, respectively, P < 0.001) but the percentage of degenerated oocytes was significantly higher in girls (35.5% versus 17.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). IVM rates were significantly lower in prepubertal than postpubertal population (10.3% versus 28.1%, P = 0.002). In adults, a negative correlation was observed between number of retrieved oocytes and age (P = 0.002; r = -0.271); the correlation was positive between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and number of collected oocytes (P = 0.002; r = 0.264). IVM rates were not correlated with AMH levels (r = 0.06) or age (r = -0.033). At present, nine oocytes and one embryo have been warmed in four patients and one biochemical pregnancy obtained. This suggests the combined procedure could be an additional option for fertility preservation.

Chapter 1 Historical Background on Gamete and Embryo Cryopreservation

This chapter describes the development of the science of cryopreservation of gametes and embryos of various species including human. It attempts to record in brief the main contributions of workers in their attempts to cryopreserve gametes and embryos. The initial difficulties faced and subsequent developments and triumphs leading to present-day state of the art are given in a concise manner. The main players and their contributions are mentioned and the authors' aim is to do justice to them. This work also attempts to ensure that credit is correctly attributed for significant advances in gamete and embryo cryopreservation. In general this chapter has tried to describe the historical development of the science of cryopreservation of gametes and embryos as accurately as possible without bias or partiality.

Fertility Preservation Decisions Among Newly Diagnosed Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate fertility preservation decisions and compare controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes between newly diagnosed cancer patients and age-matched healthy controls.

METHODS

Our retrospective study was conducted at Columbia University's Center for Women's Reproductive Care between 2005 and 2012. Forty-nine women elected to undergo ART with COS for either oocyte or embryo cryopreservation before commencement of cancer therapy. Demographic and descriptive characteristics were collected from the cohort of patients. Treatment outcomes were compared with randomly selected, healthy, age-matched controls undergoing ART with COS during the same time period.

RESULTS

Single women began fertility preservation cycles in half the time of married women (10.4 vs. 22.9 d). All 21 married women chose embryo cryopreservation, whereas 17 of the 28 (61%) single women chose embryo over oocyte cryopreservation. Baseline anti-Mullerian hormone levels and body mass indices were similar among fertility preservation patients and controls. Despite elevated baseline estradiol (E2) levels and luteal phase cycle starts in some cycles to avoid delay of cancer treatment, no significant differences were noted when comparing days of stimulation, total gonadotropins prescribed, numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, or cancellation rate to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that, with appropriate counseling and multidisciplinary care, newly diagnosed cancer patients desiring fertility preservation experience similar outcomes as age-matched healthy controls. These women can pursue oocyte or embryo cryopreservation with likely minimal disruption to the flow of their oncologic care.

Thermal and clinical performance of a closed device designed for human oocyte vitrification based on the optimization of the warming rate

Although it was qualitatively pointed out by Fahy et al. (1984), the key role of the warming rates in non-equillibrium vitrification has only recently been quantitatively established for murine oocytes by Mazur and Seki (2011). In this work we study the performance of a closed vitrification device designed under the new paradigm, for the vitrification of human oocytes. The vitrification carrier consists of a main straw in which a specifically designed capillary is mounted and where the oocytes are loaded by aspiration. It can be hermetically sealed before immersion in liquid nitrogen for vitrification, and it is warmed in a sterile water bath at 37 °C. Measured warming rates achieved with this design were of 600.000 ºC/min for a standard DMEM solution and 200.000 ºC/min with the vitrification solution for human oocytes. A cohort of 143 donor MII sibling human oocytes was split into two groups: control (fresh) and vitrified with SafeSpeed device. Similar results were found in both groups: survival (97.1%), fertilization after ICSI (74.7% in control vs. 77.3% in vitrified) and good quality embryos at day three (54.3% in control vs. 58.1% in vitrified) were settled as performance indicators. The pregnancy rate was 3/6 (50%) for the control, 2/3 (66%) for vitrified and 4/5 (80%) for mixed transfers.

Closed vitrification of human oocytes and blastocysts: outcomes from a series of clinical cases

PURPOSE

High survival rates and clinical outcomes similar to those from fresh oocytes and blastocysts have been observed with open oocyte vitrification systems. It has been suggested that the extremely fast cooling rates that are only achieved with open systems are necessary for human oocyte and blastocyst vitrification. However, there is a potential risk of introducing contamination with open systems. The aim of this study was to assess whether similar survival and subsequent implantation rates could be achieved using a closed vitrification system for human oocytes and blastocysts.

METHODS

Initially, donated immature oocytes that were matured in vitro were vitrified using the cryoprotectants ethylene glycol (EG) + dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) + sucrose and either a closed system (Rapid-i®) or an open system (Cryolock). The closed system was subsequently introduced clinically for mature oocyte cryopreservation cases and blastocyst vitrification.

RESULTS

Using in vitro matured oocytes, a similar survival was achieved with the open system of 92.4 % (73/79) and with the closed system of 89.7 % (35/39). For clinical oocyte closed vitrification, high survival rate of 90.5 % (374/413) and an implantation rate of 32.7 % (18/55) from the transfer of day 2 embryos was achieved, which is similar to fresh day 2 embryo transfers. Blastocysts have also been successfully cryopreserved using the Rapid-i closed vitrification system with 94 % of blastocysts having an estimated ≥75 % of cells intact and a similar implantation rate (31.5 %) to fresh single blastocyst transfers.

CONCLUSION

Closed vitrification can achieve high survival and similar implantation rates to fresh for both oocytes and blastocysts.

New methods for cooling and storing oocytes and embryos in a clean environment of -196°C

It is well documented that oocyte vitrification using open systems provides better results than closed systems. However, its use is limited owing to risks of contamination posed by direct exposure to liquid nitrogen and cross-contamination when stored in liquid nitrogen tanks. A device that produces clean liquid air (CLAir) having similar a temperature as liquid nitrogen and a sterile storage canister device (Esther) that keeps samples sealed in their own compartment while in regular liquid nitrogen tanks were developed. The following experiments were performed: temperature measurements, bioburden tests, vitrification and storage experiments with mice embryos and human oocytes. Results showed similar cooling rates for liquid nitrogen and liquid air. Bioburden tests of CLAir and Esther showed no contamination, while massive contamination was found in "commercial" liquid nitrogen and storage canisters. Mice blastocysts had a survival rate of over 90%, with 80% hatching rate after vitirification in CLAir and 1 week storage in Esther, similar to the fresh (control) results. Human oocytes vitrified in CLAir and in liquid nitrogen for three consecutive vitrification/warming cycles showed 100% survival, seen as re-expansion in both groups. These new systems represent a breakthrough for safe vitrification using open systems and a safe storage process generally.

[A prospective study to compare the efficiency of oocyte vitrification using closed or open devices]

OBJECTIVES

Oocyte vitrification using an open device is thought to be a source of microbiological and chemical contaminations that can be avoided using a closed device. The principal purpose of this study was to compare the two vitrification protocols: closed and open system. The secondary aim was to study the effects of the storage in the vapor phase of nitrogen (VPN) on oocytes vitrified using an open system and to compare it to those of a storage in liquid nitrogen (LN).

METHODS

Forty-four patients have been included in our study between November 2014 and May 2015. Two hundred and fourteen oocytes have been vitrified at germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (0PB) and metaphase II (1PB) stages. We vitrified 96 oocytes (59 GV/37 0PB) using a closed vitrification device and 118 oocytes (57 GV/31 0PB/30 1PB) using an open device. The vitrified oocytes were then stored either in LN or in VPN. The main outcome measures were the survival rate after warming (SR), meiosis resumption rate (MRR) and maturation rate (MR).

RESULTS

The global post-thaw SR was significantly higher for oocytes vitrified using an open system (93.2%) compared to those vitrified using a closed one (64.5%; P<0.001). On the contrary, there was no significant difference in terms of global MRR and MR (82.1% vs. 87.5% and 60.7% vs. 61.2% using closed and open system respectively). The SR, MRR and the MR were not significantly different when vitrified oocytes were stored in VPN or LN (91.6, 83.8, 64.5% vs. 93.9, 89.8, 59.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limits of our protocol, the open vitrification system remains the more efficient system. The use of sterile liquid nitrogen for oocyte vitrification and the subsequent storage in vapor phase of nitrogen could minimize the hypothetical risks of biological and chemical contaminations.

Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study

STUDY QUESTION

Is the survival of donor oocytes with the CryotopSC device superior to the survival with the closed CBSvit device?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The CryotopSC device and the CBSvit device showed similar survival rates.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Health authorities are cautious about possible cross contamination during liquid nitrogen storage or handling when working with open vitrification devices. At present, the use of open devices is still allowed since little information is available on the efficiency of closed devices.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A prospective randomized sibling oocyte study was performed in the Centre for Reproductive Medicine (UZBrussel) between January 2014 and July 2015. The survival after warming and the embryological outcome of donor oocytes vitrified using two devices was compared: the CBSvit device (closed vitrification and closed storage) and the CryotopSC device (open vitrification and closed storage). A difference of 10% was defined to prove the superiority of the CryotopSC device. In total, 250 warmed oocytes were needed in each arm.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Oocytes from 48 donors were included in the study: 253 vitrified with the CBSvit device and 257 with the CryotopSC device. Equal numbers of oocytes from both devices and originated from the same donor cycle were allocated to each of 78 recipients, in order to exclude donor and recipient (male factor) effects.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There were no differences found between the CBSvit and the CryotopSC in terms of survival after warming (93.7 versus 89.9%) or fertilization per injected oocyte (74.3 versus 81.4%). The degeneration rate after ICSI was significantly higher for the CBSvit device: 11.4 versus 6.1% (P = 0.041). A significantly higher number of zygotes in the CryotopSC group finished their first mitosis 25-27 h post-injection (34.1 versus 52.1%, P = 0.001). On Day 3, the overall embryo quality distribution did not vary between groups, but a significantly higher cell number was obtained in the CryotopSC device: 6.8 ± 2.8 versus 7.6 ± 2.8 (P = 0.01). The utilization rate per mature oocyte, per surviving oocyte or per fertilized oocyte did not differ. The embryos with the highest quality were selected for transfer on Day 3. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was 36.5%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The results of this study should not be extrapolated to other female groups, since oocytes from young fertile donors were used in this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In many countries, the use of open devices is still allowed due to the limited reports on the efficiency of closed devices. Knowing the caution of health authorities about the use of open devices, there is an urgent need for efficiency studies with closed devices. The results obtained in the current study shows the efficiency of a safe closed vitrification device, leaving behind any concern about possible cross contamination during handling or storage.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

No funding was obtained. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01952184.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

24 September 2013.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

23 January 2014.

Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical outcomes achieved after 6 years' experience in ovum donation conducted with vitrified oocytes; to attempt to find predictors of survival; and to provide information about the probability of having a baby according to the number of oocytes consumed.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENT(S)

Recipients of vitrified oocytes (January 2007-March 2013), including all the warming procedures (n = 3,610) and all the donations made during the same period (n = 3,467).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Survival rate per warming procedure, cumulative delivery rates (CDR) per single donation cycle, oocyte-to-baby rate, and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte consumed.

RESULT(S)

Oocyte survival rate was 90.4%. It was not possible to develop a predictive model for survival owing to the lack of prognostic value of the studied variables. Implantation, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates per donation cycle were 39.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.8-40.5), 48.4% (95% CI, 46.7-50.1), and 39.9% (95% CI, 38.3-41.5), respectively. Statistical differences were found when comparing blastocysts versus day 3 ETs (42.5%; 95% CI, 40.4-45.2 vs. 37.5%; 95% CI, 35.3-39.7 ongoing pregnancy rate). The CDR/donation cycle, including cryotransfers, was 78.8% (95% CI, 73.5-84.1). The oocyte-to-baby rate was 6.5%. CLBR increased progressively according to the number of oocytes consumed.

CONCLUSION(S)

We provide detailed information about the high efficiency of using vitrified/warmed oocytes. There is currently no way of estimating donors' oocytes survival when considering baseline characteristics, storage time, or controlled ovarian stimulation parameters. The probability of achieving a baby using vitrified oocytes increases progressively with the number of oocytes consumed.

In vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes recovered from ovariectomy specimens in the laboratory: a promising "ex vivo" method of oocyte cryopreservation resulting in the first report of an ongoing pregnancy in Europe

PURPOSE

We present our center's experience with 34 consecutive cases who underwent in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes obtained from ovariectomy specimens and compare our data with updated literature data.

METHODS

Feasibility and efficiency of oocyte collection during ovarian tissue processing was assessed by the recovery rate, maturation rate, and embryological development after IVM.

RESULTS

On average, 14 immature oocytes were retrieved per patient during ovarian tissue processing in 33/34 patients. The overall maturation rate after IVM was 36%. The maturation rate correlated with the age of the patient and the duration of IVM. Predominately, oocyte vitrification was performed. Eight couples preferred embryo cryopreservation. Here, a 65% fertilization rate was obtained and at least one good-quality day 3 embryo was cryopreserved in 7/8 couples. The retrieval of oocytes ex vivo resulted in mature oocytes or embryos available for vitrification in 79% of patients. One patient with ovarian insufficiency following therapeutic embolization of the left uterine and the right ovarian artery because of an arteriovenous malformation had an embryo transfer of one good-quality warmed embryo generated after IVM ex vivo, which resulted in an ongoing clinical pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

IVM of oocytes obtained ex vivo during the processing of ovarian cortex prior to cryopreservation is a procedure with emerging promise for patients at risk for fertility loss, as illustrated by the reported pregnancy. However, more data are needed in order to estimate the overall success rate and safety of this novel approach.

[Vitrification: Principles and results]

Sperm and embryos cryopreservation is a commonly applied technique for several years. Recently authorized in France, vitrification tends to replace gradually the conventional technique of slow freezing, so upsetting the practices in the management of patients. It allows from now on the cryopreservation of oocytes and opens new perspectives in egg donation either still in fertility preservation. This review thus attempted to examine the contribution of vitrification in the freezing of oocytes and human embryos at various stages of development. If obviously vitrification appears as the current method of choice for the cryopreservation of oocytes as well as blastocysts, the results are less cut as regards embryos to early stages. No increase in adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in children conceived from vitrified oocytes or embryos is noted in the literature.

Fine morphological assessment of quality of human mature oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification with a closed device: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Human mature oocytes are very susceptible to cryodamage. Several reports demonstrated that vitrification might preserve oocyte better than slow freezing. However, this is still controversial. Thus, larger clinical, biological and experimental trials to confirm this concept are necessary. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare fine morphological features in human mature oocytes cryopreserved with either slow freezing or vitrification.

METHODS

We used 47 supernumerary human mature (metaphase II) oocytes donated by consenting patients, aged 27-32 years, enrolled in an IVF program. Thirtyfive oocytes were cryopreserved using slow freezing with 1.5 M propanediol +0.2 M sucrose concentration (20 oocytes) or a closed vitrification system (CryoTip Irvine Scientific CA) (15 oocytes). Twelve fresh oocytes were used as controls. All samples were prepared for light and transmission electron microscopy evaluation.

RESULTS

Control, slow frozen/thawed and vitrified/warmed oocytes (CO, SFO and VO, respectively) were rounded, 90-100 μm in diameter, with normal ooplasm showing uniform distribution of organelles. Mitochondria-smooth endoplasmic reticulum (M-SER) aggregates and small mitochondria-vesicle (MV) complexes were the most numerous structures found in all CO, SFO and VO cultured for 3-4 hours. M-SER aggregates decreased, and large MV complexes increased in those SFO and VO maintained in culture for a prolonged period of time (8-9 hours). A slight to moderate vacuolization was present in the cytoplasm of SFO. Only a slight vacuolization was present in VO, whereas vacuoles were almost completely absent in CO. Amount and density of cortical granules (CG) appeared abnormally reduced in SFO and VO, irrespective of the protocol applied.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though, both slow freezing and vitrification ensured a good overall preservation of the oocyte, we found that: 1) prolonged culture activates an intracellular membrane "recycling" that causes the abnormal transformation of the membranes of the small MV complexes and of SER into larger rounded vesicles; 2) vacuolization appears as a recurrent form of cell damage during slow freezing and, at a lesser extent, during vitrification using a closed device; 3) premature CG exocytosis was present in both SFO and VO and may cause zona pellucida hardening.

[Effects of artificial shrinkage prior to vitrification in a closed system: a randomized controlled trial]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of induced blastocoele shrinkage before vitrification in a closed carrier device.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prior to vitrification, blastocyst cavity was artificially shrinked by laser pulse or not treated according to a 2:1 randomized procedure. A total of 185 warming cycles from April 2011 to March 2013 have been analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rate and survival rate were compared between the two groups. The mean (±SD) women age was 33.5±5.7 years for both groups.

RESULTS

The pregnancy rate in the group with artificial reduction of the cavity was higher ([32/67] 47.7%) than in the control group but not significantly ([43/113] 38%). The survival rate in the artificial shrinkage group was significantly higher compared with the control group : 99% (102/103) and 91.8% (168/183) respectively (P=0.01).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study reveals that artificial shrinkage of blastocoelic cavity by laser pulse before vitrification in a closed carrier device improves survival rate after warming.

The efficiency of a donor-recipient program using infertile donors' egg cryo-banking: a Brazilian reality

PURPOSE

To determine whether Brazilian egg donation treatment outcomes with oocytes donated from infertile couples are equivalent to those obtained worldwide with oocytes donated from fertile egg-donors.

METHODS

In this descriptive study, egg-donation cycles from 259 women, performed from January 2009 to July 2013, were evaluated. Oocytes were obtained from patients undergoing ICSI who decided to donate their surplus oocytes. We described the survival, fertilization, blastocyst, implantation and pregnancy rates obtained in our infertile donor-recipient program. In addition, we described the results obtained in previous published studies.

RESULTS

In our egg-donation program we obtained a fertilization rate of 72.9 %, a blastocyst formation rate of 53.2 %, an implantation rate of 31.1 % and the estimated clinical pregnancy rate per warmed oocyte was 5.4 %. The analyzed studies, performed between 2008 and 2013, included varying numbers of egg-donors (range: 20-600), warmed oocytes (range: 123-3826) and survival rates (range: 85.6-92.5 %). Fertilization rates ranged from 74.2 to 87.0 %, blastocyst formation rate ranged from 41.3 % to 68.0 %, implantation rates ranged from 24.7 % to 55.3 % and the clinical pregnancy rate per warmed oocyte ranged from 3.9 % to 9.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

New and reassuring information derived from our egg-donation program demonstrates outcomes similar to those reported for other egg donation programs.

Vitrification in human and domestic animal embryology: work in progress

According to the analysis of papers published in major international journals, rapidly increasing application of vitrification is one of the greatest achievements in domestic animal and especially human embryology during the first decade of our century. This review highlights factors supporting or hampering this progress, summarises results achieved with vitrification and outlines future tasks to fully exploit the benefits of this amazing approach that has changed or will change many aspects of laboratory (and also clinical) embryology. Supporting factors include the simplicity, cost efficiency and convincing success of vitrification compared with other approaches in all species and developmental stages in mammalian embryology, while causes that slow down the progress are mostly of human origin: inadequate tools and solutions, superficial teaching, improper application and unjustified concerns resulting in legal restrictions. Elimination of these hindrances seems to be a slower process and more demanding task than meeting the biological challenge. A key element of future progress will be to pass the pioneer age, establish a consensus regarding biosafety requirements, outline the indispensable features of a standard approach and design fully-automated vitrification machines executing all phases of the procedure, including equilibration, cooling, warming and dilution steps.

Freezing the Biological Clock: A Viable Fertility Preservation Option for Young Singaporean Women?

In March 2012, an article in The Straits Times entitled ‘Freezing eggs could reverse falling birth rate’ suggested that employing the latest oocyte cryopreservation techniques could both foster individual women’s reproductive autonomy and impact Singapore’s fertility rate, which in recent years has consistently been among the world’s lowest. The article cited both local and international fertility specialists’ approval of elective oocyte cryopreservation for young women wishing to protect their reproductive potential against ageing and as a potential antidote to the contemporary ‘delay and defer’ model of family-building. Later in 2012, the Ministry of Health announced a review of oocyte cryopreservation policy taking into account related medical, scientific and ethical issues, while the Singapore College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists endorsed oocyte cryopreservation as an “important, safe and efficient technology”. This paper outlines and analyses the arguments and empirical evidence used both to support and oppose offering elective oocyte cryopreservation as a routine fertility service, before concluding that this remains unjustifiable on the basis of insufficient evidence of its clinical efficacy and safety as regards either pregnancy rates or birth outcomes. If it is to be made available at all for these reasons in Singapore, it should be subjected to rigorous clinic-specific evaluation in accordance with accepted clinical and ethical norms. Key words: Elective oocyte cryopreservation, Outcomes

Assisted reproduction counseling in women aged 40 and above: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Fertility treatment in women aged ≥40 year old remains difficult and controversial. All available studies in older women report results of one specific method of ART, i.e. IUI, IVF/ICSI or oocyte donation, and success rates are always published per attempt but never per patient. Randomized studies are not available because of the obvious heterogeneity in patient populations and treatment options. This prospective observational study aimed at analyzing the outcome in a consecutive cohort of patients above 40 undergoing various methods of ART.

METHODS

A total number of 909 women older than 40 attended our fertility centre during a 3 years period. A flowchart showing the consecutive ART treatments with their respective outcome was constructed. Any delivery after 22 weeks gestation (or 500 g.) was taken as primary endpoint. Crude cumulative delivery rates (CDRs) and binomial exact 95 % confidence limits (95 % CLs) were calculated for each group of interest.

RESULTS

ART treatment could be proposed to 737 patients (81 %) and eventually 585 patients (64 %) started ART treatment: 111 patients started IUI, 439 patients started IVF/ICSI and 35 patients started oocyte donation as a primary approach ART. Ten patients got pregnant spontaneously and delivered before starting any treatment. In the 909 patients consulting for infertility, 111 deliveries were achieved after ART, i.e. a crude CDR of 12.2 % (95 % CL 10.1 % to 14.5 %).

CONCLUSION

Only 10 % of patients aged 40 and above could achieve delivery of their genetically-own child, while 1 % conceived spontaneously. More than one third of patients consulting never started any treatment for different reasons, i.e. anticipated poor prognosis, financial restrictions, illness or spontaneous pregnancy.

Is AMH useful to reduce low ovarian response to GnRH antagonist protocol in oocyte donors?

We aimed to establish the reference values of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in our oocyte donor population and correlate them with the ovarian response to an antagonist stimulation protocol and to study the predictive capacity of AMH for poor response (PR). Normal AMH curves were obtained for 172 candidates. AMH levels decreased with age although they showed great heterogeneity and spread in absolute values at any age range. AMH levels showed a positive correlation, statistically significant, with the Antral Follicle Count (r = 0,705), and number of oocytes retrieved (r = 0,356). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis a threshold value of AMH = 2.31 ng/ml predictive for retrieval <6 MII (area under the curve (AUC) 0.675) was identified. This cut-off predicted PR with a sensitivity of 70.4% and a specificity of 61.8%, (PPV = 39.6%; NPV = 85.5%, p = 0.004). When performing a multiple logistic regression analysis including age, AFC and FSH, an AUC = 0.668 for PR was obtained whereas if AMH was added to the model it resulted in an AUC = 0.713. In oocyte donors aged 18 to 35 with an AFC ≥ 10 and basal FSH <10 mIU/ml, measuring AMH levels improved just slightly the prediction for PR.

Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients?

The aim of this review is to provide current knowledge on oocyte cryopreservation, with special emphasis on vitrification as a means to preserve fertility in different indications. Major advancements achieved in the past few years in the cryolaboratory have facilitated major changes in our practice. Areas such as fertility preservation for social or oncologic reasons, the possibility to create oocyte banks for egg donation programs, the opportunity to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, or to accumulate oocytes in low-yield patients, or even to offer treatment segmentation by stimulating the ovaries, vitrifying, and then transferring in a natural cycle are some of the options that are now available with the development of cryopreservation. We present general experience from our group and others on fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline as well as in oncologic patients, confirming that oocyte vitrification is a standardized, simple, reproducible, and efficient option.

Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification

PURPOSE

To compare two vitrification methods and two warming methods for human oocyte vitrification using a high security closed device in terms of survival, fertilization and embryo development.

METHODS

For vitrification, oocytes were (1) immediately placed in equilibration solution or (2) they were gradually exposed to the cryoprotectants. For warming, oocytes were placed (1) in a 25 μl preheated (37 °C) thawing solution droplet that was put at room temperature for 1 min once the oocytes were inside or (2) in a 150 μl droplet for 1 minute at 37 °C.

RESULTS

Survival and preimplantation development were significantly lower when warming was performed in a small preheated droplet. There was no significant difference in survival and embryo development between the gradual or direct exposure to cryoprotectants.

CONCLUSIONS

Using this high security closed vitrification device a 90 % survival rate can be achieved when the oocytes are immediately warmed in a large volume at 37 °C.