An evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic screening

Updates in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves taking a biopsy of an early embryo created through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Genetic testing is performed on the biopsy, in order to select which embryo to transfer. PGT began as an experimental procedure in the 1990s, but is now an integral part of assisted human reproduction (AHR). PGT allows for embryo selection which can reduce the risk of transmission of inherited disease and may reduce the chance of implantation failure and pregnancy loss. This is a rapidly evolving area, which raises important ethical issues. This review article aims to give a brief history of PGT, an overview of the current evidence in PGT along with highlighting exciting areas of research to advance this technology.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors

PURPOSE

In a preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycle, does the blastocyst quality before biopsy, or the day of biopsy, or the embryo hatching status have an impact on either euploidy or the rate of embryo survival after freezing?

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 6130 biopsied blastocysts coming from 1849 PGT-A cycles performed in our center (2016-2022). Embryos were categorized according to the inner cell mass and trophectoderm quality, using Gardner's scoring (excellent: AA; good: AB, BA, BB; poor: AC, CA, BC, CB, CC); the day of biopsy (5 or 6); and their hatching status (fully hatched blastocysts [FHB] or non-fully hatched blastocysts [nFHB]). The independent relationship between each group and both euploidy and survival rate was assessed.

RESULTS

Excellent-quality embryos were more euploid than both good- and poor-quality embryos (52.69%, 39.69%, and 26.21%; p < 0.001), and day 5-biopsied embryos were more euploid than day 6-biopsied embryos (39.98% and 34.80%; p < 0.001). Survival rates of excellent-quality (92.26%) and good-quality (92.47%) embryos were higher than survival rates in the poor-quality group (84.61%) (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002). Day 5-biopsied embryos survived better than day 6-biopsied embryos (93.71% vs. 83.69%; p < 0.001) and FHB had poorer survival than nFHB (78.61% vs. 93.52%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent-quality and day 5-biopsied embryos are more prone to be euploid than good and poor or day 6-biopsied embryos, respectively. Poor-quality, day 6-biopsied embryos, and FHB have significantly lower survival after biopsy and vitrification.

To transfer or not to transfer: the dilemma of mosaic embryos - a narrative review

A frequent finding after preimplantation genetic diagnostic testing for aneuploidies using next-generation sequencing is an embryo that is putatively mosaic. The prevalence of this outcome remains unclear and varies with technical and external factors. Mosaic embryos can be classified by the percentage of cells affected, type of chromosome involvement (whole or segmental), number of affected chromosomes or affected cell type (inner mass cell, trophectoderm or both). The origin of mosaicism seems to be intrinsic as a post-zygotic mitotic error, but some external factors can play a role. As experience has increased with the transfer of mosaic embryos, clinical practice has gradually become more flexible in recent years. Nevertheless, clinical results show lower implantation, pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates and higher miscarriage rates with mosaic embryo transfer when compared with the transfer of euploid embryos. Prenatal diagnosis is highly recommended after the transfer of mosaic embryos. This narrative review is intended to serve as reference material for practitioners in reproductive medicine who must manage a mosaic embryo result after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

The mosaic embryo: what it means for the doctor and the patient

INTRODUCTION

Mosaic embryos are embryos that on preimplantation genetic analysis are found to be composed of euploid and aneuploid cells. Although most of these embryos do not implant when transferred into the uterus following IVF treatment, some may implant and are capable of giving rise to babies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

There is currently an increasing number of reports of live births following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Compared to euploid, mosaic embryos have lower implantation rates and higher rates of miscarriage, and occasionally aneuploid component persists. However, their outcome is better than that obtained after the transfer of embryos consisting entirely of aneuploid cells. After implantation, the ability to develop into a full-term pregnancy is influenced by the amount and type of chromosomal mosaicism present in a mosaic embryo. Nowadays many experts in the reproductive field consider mosaic transfers as an option when no euploid embryos are available. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a pregnancy with healthy baby but also on the risk that mosaicism could persist and result in liveborn with chromosomal abnormality. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

So far, the transfers of 2155 mosaic embryos have been documented and 440 live births resulting in healthy babies have been reported. In addition, in the literature to date, there are 6 cases in which embryonic mosaicism persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the available data indicate that mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies, albeit with lower success rates than euploids. Further clinical outcomes should be collected to better establish a refined ranking of embryos to transfer.

Challenges experienced by genetic counselors while they provided counseling about mosaic embryos

Objective

To survey genetic counselors (GCs) who have counseled about mosaic embryos regarding the challenges they faced in counseling this patient population and assess their need for more resources to support their practice.

Design

Self-administered online survey.

Setting

Academic university.

Study Population

Seventy-eight GCs primarily from the United States and Canada.

Interventions

Genetic counselors completed a quantitative survey with an embedded qualitative component. Quantitative data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. An inductive thematic analysis was performed on open-text responses.

Main Outcome Measures

Genetic counselors were asked what clinical activities relating to mosaic embryos they performed. They were then asked to rate how challenging each activity was to perform using a 5-point scale; a rating of 4 or 5 was defined as highly challenging. Open-text questions enabled GCs to describe factors that they felt contributed to these challenges.

Results

The challenges reported by GCs included the uncertainty of outcomes in offspring after mosaic embryo transfer, limited guidelines available to assist clinicians with counseling about mosaic embryos, and ranking mosaic embryos by suitability for transfer. The contributing factors suggested by participants included limited outcome data, limited GC involvement in pretest counseling for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and perceived inconsistency in counseling practices across clinics. Genetic counselors differed in their genetic testing recommendations for pregnancies conceived after mosaic embryo transfer. Amniocentesis and postnatal assessment were recommended by 85% and 49% of GCs, respectively, and 15% recommended chorionic villus sampling and noninvasive prenatal testing. Almost all (92%) reported a need for more resources, such as standardized guidelines, more outcome data, and continuing education on PGT-A and mosaicism.

Conclusions

This study describes challenges experienced by GCs while they counseled about mosaic embryos. Our findings demonstrate a need for more outcome data on mosaic embryo pregnancies and for evidence-based clinical guidelines. The differing recommendations for prenatal genetic testing among GCs in the study warrant further research into contributing factors. We strongly recommend that pretest counseling, including a discussion regarding mosaicism, is provided to all couples considering PGT-A to reduce counseling challenges and to promote patients' informed decision-making.

Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy of blastocysts: a committee opinion

This revised document incorporates a growing number of published studies about mosaic embryo transfer and provides current evidence-based considerations for the clinical management of embryos with mosaic results on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. This document replaces the document titled "Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion," published in 2020 (Fertil Steril 2020;114:246-54).

Chromosomal, gestational, and neonatal outcomes of embryos classified as a mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To understand the clinical risks associated with the transfer of embryos classified as a mosaic using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

DESIGN

Analysis of data collected between 2017 and 2023.

SETTING

Multicenter.

PATIENTS

Patients of infertility treatment.

INTERVENTION

Comparison of pregnancies resulting from embryos classified as euploid or mosaic using the 20%-80% interval in chromosomal intermediate copy numbers to define a mosaic result.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of spontaneous abortion, birth weight, length of gestation, incidence of birth defects, and chromosomal status during gestation.

RESULTS

Implanted euploid embryos had a significantly lower risk of spontaneous abortion compared with mosaic embryos (8.9% [n = 8,672; 95% confidence interval {CI95} 8.3, 9.5] vs. 22.2% [n = 914; CI95 19.6, 25.0]). Embryos with mosaicism affecting whole chromosomes (not segmental) had the highest risk of spontaneous abortion (27.6% [n = 395; CI95 23.2, 32.3]). Infants born from euploid, mosaic, and whole chromosome mosaic embryos had average birth weights and lengths of gestation that were not statistically different (3,118 g and 267 days [n = 488; CI95 3,067, 3,169, and 266, 268], 3052 g and 265 days [n = 488; CI95 2,993, 3,112, and 264,267], 3,159 g and 268 days [n = 194; CI95 3,070, 3,249, and 266,270], respectively). Out of 488 infants from mosaic embryo transfers (ETs), one had overt gross abnormalities as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most prenatal tests performed on pregnancies from mosaic ETs had normal results, and only three pregnancies produced prenatal test results reflecting the mosaicism detected at the embryonic stage (3 out of 250, 1.2%; CI95 0.25, 3.5).

CONCLUSION

Although embryos classified as mosaic experience higher rates of miscarriage than euploid embryos (with a particularly high frequency shortly after implantation), infants born of mosaic ETs are similar to infants of euploid ETs. Prenatal testing indicates that mosaicism resolves during most pregnancies, although this process is not perfectly efficient. In a small percentage of cases, the mosaicism persists through gestation. These findings can serve as risk-benefit considerations for mosaic ETs in the fertility clinic.

Chromosomal Aberrations As a Biological Phenomenon in Human Embryonic Development

Frequent chromosomal abnormalities are a distinctive feature of early embryonic development in mammals, especially humans. Aneuploidy is considered as a contributing factor to failed embryo implantation and spontaneous abortions. In the case of chromosomal mosaicism, its effect on the potency of embryos to normally develop has not been sufficiently studied. Although, a significant percentage of chromosomal defects in early human embryos are currently believed to be associated with the features of clinical and laboratory protocols, in this review, we focus on the biological mechanisms associated with chromosomal abnormalities. In particular, we address the main events in oocyte meiosis that affects not only the genetic status of an unfertilized oocyte, but also further embryo viability, and analyze the features of first cleavage divisions and the causes of frequent chromosomal errors in early embryonic development. In addition, we discuss current data on self-correction of the chromosomal status in early embryos.

Mitochondrial DNA quantification correlates with the developmental potential of human euploid blastocysts but not with that of mosaic blastocysts

PURPOSE

We aimed to study the association between adjusted mtDNA levels in human trophectoderm biopsy samples and the developmental potential of euploid and mosaic blastocysts.

METHODS

We analyzed relative mtDNA levels in 2,814 blastocysts obtained from 576 couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy from June 2018 to June 2021. All patients underwent in vitro fertilization in a single clinic; the study was blinded-mtDNA content was unknown at the time of single embryo transfer. The fate of the euploid or mosaic embryos transferred was compared with mtDNA levels.

RESULTS

Euploid embryos had lower mtDNA than aneuploid and mosaic embryos. Embryos biopsied on Day 5 had higher mtDNA than those biopsied on Day 6. No difference was detected in mtDNA scores between embryos derived from oocytes of different maternal ages. Linear mixed model suggested that blastulation rate was associated with mtDNA score. Moreover, the specific next-generation sequencing platform used have a significant effect on the observed mtDNA content. Euploid embryos with higher mtDNA content presented significantly higher miscarriage rates and lower live birth rates, while no significant difference was observed in the mosaic cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results will aid in improving methods for analyzing the association between mtDNA level and blastocyst viability.

ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure

STUDY QUESTION

How should recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in patients undergoing ART be defined and managed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This is the first ESHRE good practice recommendations paper providing a definition for RIF together with recommendations on how to investigate causes and contributing factors, and how to improve the chances of a pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

RIF is a challenge in the ART clinic, with a multitude of investigations and interventions offered and applied in clinical practice, often without biological rationale or with unequivocal evidence of benefit.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, if available, and the results of a previously published survey on clinical practice in RIF and the expertise of the working group. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane focussing on 'recurrent reproductive failure', 'recurrent implantation failure', and 'repeated implantation failure'.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure included eight members representing the ESHRE Special Interest Groups for Implantation and Early Pregnancy, Reproductive Endocrinology, and Embryology, with an independent chair and an expert in statistics. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the working group, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey on uptake in clinical practice. The draft document was then open to ESHRE members for online peer review and was revised in light of the comments received.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The working group recommends considering RIF as a secondary phenomenon of ART, as it can only be observed in patients undergoing IVF, and that the following description of RIF be adopted: 'RIF describes the scenario in which the transfer of embryos considered to be viable has failed to result in a positive pregnancy test sufficiently often in a specific patient to warrant consideration of further investigations and/or interventions'. It was agreed that the recommended threshold for the cumulative predicted chance of implantation to identify RIF for the purposes of initiating further investigation is 60%. When a couple have not had a successful implantation by a certain number of embryo transfers and the cumulative predicted chance of implantation associated with that number is greater than 60%, then they should be counselled on further investigation and/or treatment options. This term defines clinical RIF for which further actions should be considered. Nineteen recommendations were formulated on investigations when RIF is suspected, and 13 on interventions. Recommendations were colour-coded based on whether the investigations/interventions were recommended (green), to be considered (orange), or not recommended, i.e. not to be offered routinely (red).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

While awaiting the results of further studies and trials, the ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure recommends identifying RIF based on the chance of successful implantation for the individual patient or couple and to restrict investigations and treatments to those supported by a clear rationale and data indicating their likely benefit.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This article provides not only good practice advice but also highlights the investigations and interventions that need further research. This research, when well-conducted, will be key to making progress in the clinical management of RIF.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The meetings and technical support for this project were funded by ESHRE. N.M. declared consulting fees from ArtPRED (The Netherlands) and Freya Biosciences (Denmark); Honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Abbott, and IBSA; being co-founder of Verso Biosense. He is Co-Chief Editor of Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO). D.C. declared being an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, and declared honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, and Fairtility; support for attending meetings from Cooper Surgical, Fujifilm Irvine Scientific. G.G. declared that he or his institution received financial or non-financial support for research, lectures, workshops, advisory roles, or travelling from Ferring, Merck, Gedeon-Richter, PregLem, Abbott, Vifor, Organon, MSD, Coopersurgical, ObsEVA, and ReprodWissen. He is an Editor of the journals Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biomedicine Online, and Editor in Chief of Journal Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. He is involved in guideline developments and quality control on national and international level. G.L. declared he or his institution received honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, Vianex/Organon, and MSD. He is an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, immediate past Coordinator of Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology of ESHRE and has been involved in Guideline Development Groups of ESHRE and national fertility authorities. D.J.M. declared being an Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open and statistical Advisor for Reproductive Biomedicine Online. B.T. declared being shareholder of Reprognostics and she or her institution received financial or non-financial support for research, clinical trials, lectures, workshops, advisory roles or travelling from support for attending meetings from Ferring, MSD, Exeltis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Teva, Theramex and Novartis, Astropharm, Ferring. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

Clinical outcomes of subtypes of mosaic single aneuploid embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

Mosaic embryos are often characterized by different numbers (single or double or ≥ 3 aneuploidies) or types of chromosomal abnormalities (monosomy or trisomy and involving whole chromosome or chromosome segments). However, due to limitations in the number of samples, the relationship between these abnormalities and clinical outcomes is often not evaluated.

METHODS

This study analyzed chromosomal abnormalities and clinical outcomes in 591 aneuploid mosaic and 3071 euploid embryos from multiple retrospective cohorts as well as from the current authors' unpublished retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

Through meta-analysis, it was found that single aneuploid mosaicism reduced implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. In addition, no significant differences were noted between mosaic trisomies and mosaic monosomies in terms of their effects on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. All subtypes of single aneuploid mosaicism were found to reduce implantation and clinical pregnancy rates for women of over 35 years old. Furthermore, it was observed that all subtypes of single aneuploid in higher-level mosaicism reduced implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Regarding the lower-level group, only segmental mosaicism with segmental chromosome gain reduced both of the above rates. Unexpectedly, the type of chromosome abnormality was more likely to influence miscarriage rates compared with the level of mosaicism. Indeed, monosomy aneuploid mosaic embryos increased miscarriage rates in both lower- and higher-levels mosaic ratio groups, but not other subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the mechanism for the above phenomenon remains unknown, it is recommended that attention should still be paid to the increased miscarriage rates caused by monosomy in aneuploid mosaic embryos.

What proportion of embryos should be considered for transfer following a mosaic diagnosis? A study of 115 clinics from a central diagnostic laboratory

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to identify what proportion of mosaic embryo diagnoses should be considered for transfer, and thereby assess the impact on patient cases.

METHODS

We categorised mosaic embryos into 3 groups; high, medium and low priority for transfer based on the percentage of biopsy sample being aneuploid and the chromosomes involved. The categories were applied to those patients that had no euploid embryo diagnoses but 1 or more mosaic embryos identified as mosaic available after PGT-A.

RESULTS

In total, 6614 PGT-A cases from 115 clinics and a single diagnostic laboratory were reviewed. Further, 1384 [20.9%] cases only had aneuploid embryos, 4538 [68.6%] cases had one or more euploid embryos and 692 [10.5%] cases had no euploid and one or more mosaic embryo. The mosaic embryos in the no euploid, one or more mosaic group, when reviewed using priorities, resulted in: 111 [1.7%] of cases having at least one high priority mosaic available. 184 [2.8%] of cases having no high priority but at least one medium priority mosaic available. 397 [6.0%] of cases only having low priority mosaic embryos available.

CONCLUSION

Based on this data, embryos identified as mosaic will only be considered for transfer in the first instance for around 4.5% (when taking high and medium priority and excluding low priority cases) of all PGT-A cases.

Do reproductive history and information given through genetic counselling influence patients' decisions on mosaic embryo transfer?

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients' and embryonic characteristics that may have an influence on the decision to transfer a mosaic embryo.

METHOD

Single centre retrospective cohort study including 1247 PGT-A cycles. Demographic and clinical factors associated with a decision to transfer a mosaic embryo were studied. Female age, number of previous cycles, previous availability of euploid embryos, history of miscarriages and parity as well as percentage of mosaicism, type of anomaly and chromosome risk were studied in relation to decision-making. Outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer were assessed.

RESULTS

To date, in 7.9% of cycles (99/1247), patients have had to make a decision on the fate of their mosaic embryos. In 23.2% of cycles (23/99), patients decided to transfer. In most cases (79.8%; 79/99), patients underwent genetic counselling before the decision. None of the variables analysed were associated with the patients' decision, although parity and the high-degree mosaicism (>50%) seemed to be negatively associated with the decision to transfer (18.2% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.294; 10% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither reproductive history nor information on mosaic embryo characteristics through counselling seems to be determinative for patients when deciding to transfer a mosaic embryo. Promising and increasing data on clinical outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer will be of utmost importance to soften risk perception regarding mosaic embryos and give a better, simplified and more evidence-based counselling.

A novel multifunctional haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing for different genetic conditions

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an efficient and cost-effective detection platform for different genetic conditions about embryos?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A multifunctional haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing platform was provided for detecting different genetic conditions.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Genetic disease and chromosomal rearrangement have been known to significantly impact fertility and development. Therefore, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), a part of ART, has been presented together to minimize the fetal genetic risk and increase pregnancy rate. For patients or their families who are suffering from chromosome abnormality, monogenic disease, unexplained repeated spontaneous abortion or implantation failure, after accepting genetic counseling, they may be suggested to accept detection from more than one PGT platforms about the embryos to avoid some genetic diseases. However, PGT platforms work through different workflows. The high costliness, lack of material and long-time operation of combined PGT platforms limit their application.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

All 188 embryonic samples from 43 families were tested with HaploPGT platform, and most of their genetic abnormalities had been determined by different conventional PGT methods beforehand. Among them, there were 12 families only carrying structural rearrangements (115 embryos) in which 9 families accepted implantation and 5 families had normal labor ART outcomes, 7 families only carrying monogenic diseases (26 embryos) and 3 families carrying both structural rearrangements and monogenic diseases (26 embryos). Twelve monopronucleated zygotes (1PN) samples and 9 suspected triploid samples were collected from 21 families.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

Here, we raised a comprehensive PGT method called HaploPGT, combining reduced representation genome sequencing, read-count analysis, B allele frequency and haplotyping analysis, to simultaneously detect different genetic disorders in one single test.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

With 80 million reads (80M) genomic data, the proportion of windows (1 million base pairs (Mb)) containing two or more informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites was 97.81%, meanwhile the genotyping error rate stabilized at a low level (2.19%). Furthermore, the informative SNPs were equally distributed across the genome, and whole-genomic haplotyping was established. Therefore, 80M was chosen to balance the cost and accuracy in HaploPGT. HaploPGT was able to identify abnormal embryos with triploid, global and partial loss of heterozygosity, and even to distinguish parental origin of copy number variation in mosaic and non-mosaic embryos. Besides, by retrospectively analyzing 188 embryonic samples from 43 families, HaploPGT revealed 100% concordance with the available results obtained from reference methods, including PGT-A, PGT-M, PGT-SR and PGT-HLA.

LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION

Despite the numerous benefits HaploPGT could bring, it still required additional family members to deduce the parental haplotype for identifying balanced translocation and monogenic mutation in tested embryos. In terms of PGT-SR, the additional family member could be a reference embryo with unbalanced translocation. For PGT-M, a proband was normally required. In both cases, genomic information from grandparents or parental siblings might help for haplotyping theoretically. Another restriction was that haploid, and diploid resulting from the duplication of a haploid, could not be told apart by HaploPGT, but it was able to recognize partial loss of heterozygosity in the embryonic genome. In addition, it should be noted that the location of rearrangement breakpoints and the situation of mutation sites were complicated, which meant that partial genetic disorders might not be completely detected.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

HaploPGT is an efficient and cost-effective detection platform with high clinical value for detecting genetic status. This platform could promote the application of PGT in ART, to increase pregnancy rate and decrease the birth of children with genetic diseases.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873478, to L.H.), National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1003100, to L.H.), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2022JJ30414, to P.X.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of China International Trust & Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya (YNXM-201910). Haplotyping analysis has been licensed to Basecare Co., Ltd. L.K., Y.M., K.K., D.Z., N.L., J.Z. and R.D. are Basecare Co., Ltd employees. The other authors declare no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: The management of mosaic embryos

As the resolution and accuracy of diagnostic techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) are improving, more mosaic embryos are being identified. Several studies have provided evidence that mosaic embryos have reproductive potential for implantation and healthy live birth. Notably, mosaic embryos with less than 50% aneuploidy have yielded a live birth rate similar to euploid embryos. This concept has led to a major shift in current PGT-A practice, but further evidence and theoretically relevant data are required. Proper guidelines for selecting mosaic embryos suitable for transfer will reduce the number of discarded embryos and increase the chances of successful embryo transfer. We present an updated review of clinical outcomes and practice recommendations for the transfer of mosaic embryos using PGT-A.

Mosaic embryo transfer—first report of a live born with nonmosaic partial aneuploidy and uniparental disomy 15

Objective

To inform clinicians of the first known case of a live born diagnosed with syndromic partial trisomy 15 and maternal uniparental disomy 15 resulting from a mosaic embryo transfer (MET). We believe that this case will highlight the need for standardized practice guidelines to address the potential risk of MET and the importance of prenatal follow-up after a pregnancy is achieved from a MET.

Design

Case report.

Setting

In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and MET was completed at a fertility clinic in Canada. Postnatal testing and diagnosis were performed at the Medical Genetics Department of a hospital in Canada.

Patient(s)

A newborn male with a diagnosis of partial trisomy 15 and uniparental disomy (UPD) 15.

Intervention(s)

Mosaic embryo transfer after PGT-A was performed. Diagnostic testing performed after birth included a karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, chromosomal microarray, and microsatellite UPD testing.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Confirmed nonmosaic partial aneuploidy of trisomy 15 and UPD15 in a symptomatic newborn conceived from MET.

Result(s)

Singleton pregnancy was achieved after a double embryo transfer involving 1 embryo diagnosed by PGT-A with high-level mosaic trisomy 15 and high-level mosaic deletion on chromosome 20 (mos(del(20)(q11.23-qter)). Routine prenatal screening and detailed fetal ultrasound did not identify any concerns. Postnatal genetic investigations, triggered by feeding difficulties in the newborn period, diagnosed the proband with maternal UPD15 and a supernumerary marker chromosome composed of 2 noncontiguous regions of chromosome 15. This karyotype is likely resulting from incomplete trisomy rescue occurring on the paternal chromosome 15.

Conclusion(s)

This case highlights the need for better guidelines and management of pregnancies achieved after MET.

Noninvasive Chromosome Screening for Evaluating the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss or Repeated Implantation Failure

This retrospective cohort study explores whether noninvasive chromosome screening (NICS) for aneuploidy can improve the clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or repeated implantation failure (RIF) in assisted reproductive technology. A total of 273 women with a history of RPL or RIF between 2018 and 2021 were included in this study. We collected data of all oocyte retrieval cycles and single blastocyst resuscitation transfer cycles. For the patients experiencing RPL, NICS reduced the miscarriages rate per frozen embryo transfer (FET), improved the ongoing pregnancies rate and live birth rate: 17.9% vs 42.6%, adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.95; 40.7% vs 25.0%, adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.04-3.82; 38.9% vs 20.6%, adjusted OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.28-5.02, respectively. For the patients experiencing RIF, the pregnancy rates per FET in the NICS group were significantly higher than those in the non-NICS group (46.9% vs. 28.7%, adjusted OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.20-6.66). This study demonstrated that the selection of euploid embryos through NICS can reduce the miscarriage rate of patients experiencing RPL and improve the clinical pregnancy rate of patients experiencing RIF. Our data suggested NICS could be considered as a possibly useful screening test in clinical practice.

Stem Cell-Based Trophoblast Models to Unravel the Genetic Causes of Human Miscarriages

Miscarriage affects approximately 15% of clinically recognized pregnancies, and 1-3% of couples experience pregnancy loss recurrently. Approximately 50-60% of miscarriages result from chromosomal abnormalities, whereas up to 60% of euploid recurrent abortions harbor variants in candidate genes. The growing number of detected genetic variants requires an investigation into their role in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Since placental defects are the main cause of first-trimester miscarriages, the purpose of this review is to provide a survey of state-of-the-art human in vitro trophoblast models that can be used for the functional assessment of specific abnormalities/variants implicated in pregnancy loss. Since 2018, when primary human trophoblast stem cells were first derived, there has been rapid growth in models of trophoblast lineage. It has been found that a proper balance between self-renewal and differentiation in trophoblast progenitors is crucial for the maintenance of pregnancy. Different responses to aneuploidy have been shown in human embryonic and extra-embryonic lineages. Stem cell-based models provide a powerful tool to explore the effect of a specific aneuploidy/variant on the fetus through placental development, which is important, from a clinical point of view, for deciding on the suitability of embryos for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and the Mystery of Genetic Material: A Review Article

This review focuses on recent findings in the preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos. Different preimplantation genetic tests are presented along with different genetic materials and their analysis. Original material concerning preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was sourced by searching the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases in October and November 2021. The searches comprised keywords such as ‘preimplantation’, ‘cfDNA’; ‘miRNA’, ‘PGT-A’, ‘niPGT-A’, ‘aneuploidy’, ‘mosaicism’, ‘blastocyst biopsy’, ‘blastocentesis’, ‘blastocoel fluid’, ‘NGS’, ‘FISH’, and ‘aCGH’. Non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) is a novel approach to the genetic analysis of embryos. The premise is that the genetic material in the spent embryo culture media (SECM) corresponds to the genetic material in the embryo cells. The limitations of niPGT-A are a lower quantity and lesser quality of the cell-free genetic material, and its unknown origin. The concordance rate varies when compared to invasive PGT-A. Some authors have also hypothesized that mosaicism and aneuploid cells are preferentially excluded from the embryo during early development. Cell-free genetic material is readily available in the spent embryo culture media, which provides an easier, more economic, and safer extraction of genetic material for analysis. The sampling of the SECM and DNA extraction and amplification must be optimized. The origin of the cell-free media, the percentage of apoptotic events, and the levels of DNA contamination are currently unknown; these topics need to be further investigated.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #60: Management of pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization

The use of assisted reproductive technology has increased in the United States in the past several decades. Although most of these pregnancies are uncomplicated, in vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes primarily caused by the increased risks of prematurity and low birthweight associated with in vitro fertilization pregnancies. This Consult discusses the management of pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The recommendations by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine are as follows: (1) we suggest that genetic counseling be offered to all patients undergoing or who have undergone in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (GRADE 2C); (2) regardless of whether preimplantation genetic testing has been performed, we recommend that all patients who have achieved pregnancy with in vitro fertilization be offered the options of prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing via chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis (GRADE 1C); (3) we recommend that the accuracy of first-trimester screening tests, including cell-free DNA for aneuploidy, be discussed with patients undergoing or who have undergone in vitro fertilization (GRADE 1A); (4) when multifetal pregnancies do occur, we recommend that counseling be offered regarding the option of multifetal pregnancy reduction (GRADE 1C); (5) we recommend that a detailed obstetrical ultrasound examination (CPT 76811) be performed for pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (GRADE 1B); (6) we suggest that fetal echocardiography be offered to patients with pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (GRADE 2C); (7) we recommend that a careful examination of the placental location, placental shape, and cord insertion site be performed at the time of the detailed fetal anatomy ultrasound, including evaluation for vasa previa (GRADE 1B); (8) although visualization of the cervix at the 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation anatomy assessment with either a transabdominal or endovaginal approach is recommended, we do not recommend serial cervical length assessment as a routine practice for pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization (GRADE 1C); (9) we suggest that an assessment of fetal growth be performed in the third trimester for pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization; however, serial growth ultrasounds are not recommended for the sole indication of in vitro fertilization (GRADE 2B); (10) we do not recommend low-dose aspirin for patients with pregnancies achieved with IVF as the sole indication for preeclampsia prophylaxis; however, if 1 or more additional risk factors are present, low-dose aspirin is recommended (GRADE 1B); (11) given the increased risk for stillbirth, we suggest weekly antenatal fetal surveillance beginning by 36 0/7 weeks of gestation for pregnancies achieved with in vitro fertilization (GRADE 2C); (12) in the absence of studies focused specifically on timing of delivery for pregnancies achieved with IVF, we recommend shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers when considering induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C).

From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos

Chromosomal mosaicism is a hallmark of early human embryo development. The last decade yielded an enormous amount of information about diversity and prevalence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos due to progress in preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidies (PGT-A) based exclusively on molecular karyotyping of trophectoderm biopsy. However, the inner cell mass karyotype is still missing for mosaic embryos affecting the success rate of assisted reproductive medicine. Here, a classification model of chromosomal mosaicism is proposed based on the analysis of the primary zygote karyotype, the timing and types of primary and secondary chromosome segregation errors, and the distribution of mosaic cell clones between different embryonic and extraembryonic compartments of the blastocyst. Five basic principles for mosaicism analysis are introduced, namely, the estimation of the primary zygote karyotype, the investigation of additional sample point, the requirement of the second time point analysis, the delineating of reciprocity of chromosome segregation, and comprehensive chromosome screening at the single-cell level. The suggested model allows the prediction of the inner cell mass karyotype of the blastocyst and its developmental potential based on information from trophectoderm biopsy and non-invasive PGT-A using blastocoele fluid sample or spent culture medium as additional sample and time points for analysis and considering the reciprocity as a basic process in chromosome segregation errors between daughter cells in postzygotic cell divisions.

Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to standardize the practice of mosaic embryo transfer, based on the current available evidence.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant studies published were comprehensively selected using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL until 5 March 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies reporting the genetic analysis and clinical outcomes of mosaic embryo transfer were included. Risk of bias assessment was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the non-randomized studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were combined ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate and miscarriage rate, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no differences between low and high mosaic embryos when a cut-off of 40% was used in terms of OP/LBR and SAB. However, low mosaics with a cut-off of 50% compared to high mosaics showed a significantly higher OP/LBR in the NGS but not in the a-CGH group, and a significantly lower risk of SAB. No differences were noted between mosaic monosomies versus trisomies and single versus double mosaics for both OP/LBR and SAB. Finally, segmental mosaics showed a higher OP/LBR and a lower SAB compared to whole chromosomes, and single and double mosaics had a higher OP/LBR compared to complex mosaics.

CONCLUSIONS

A cut-off of 50% in defining low versus high mosaic embryos is preferable to a threshold of 40% when using NGS platform. No priority was established for mosaic trisomies over monosomies. Single and double mosaics must be preferred over complex mosaics and segmental mosaics must be preferred over whole chromosome mosaics. These results should be interpreted in the context of specific chromosomes involved in the mosaicism.

Evidence-based management of preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism: lessons from the clinic

Mosaic results obtained through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy pose ongoing challenges to clinical practice. Thorough genetic counseling for patients considering mosaic embryo transfer is consistently recommended by many best-practice statements, and providers are charged with the task of assessing and explaining potential prenatal, neonatal, and long-term risks. However, an increasing amount of outcome data from transferred embryos with mosaic results do not show any evidence of increased risk to ongoing pregnancies or newborns. This article examines how to reconcile these data with the current practices for patient education about preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and mosaic embryo risk assessment, through an evidence-based lens.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review of the Evidence

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was developed as an invasive embryo-selection technique and is extensively used in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Around 95,000 preimplantation genetic testing cycles were carried out in the United States between 2014 and 2016, the majority of which were performed for aneuploidy. The objective of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is to select for transfer a euploid embryo, after embryo biopsy and cytogenetic analysis. The current technique consists of applying comprehensive chromosome screening on trophectoderm cells after blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy. This article reviews all the published randomized controlled trials on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy with comprehensive chromosome screening and comments on the subject of embryo mosaicism detected by this technique. Most of these trials have been criticized because they only included good prognosis patients having normal ovarian reserve producing a high number of embryos available for biopsy. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy does not improve ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle started when routinely applied on the general IVF population but seems to be a good tool of embryo selection for a selected category of patients with normal ovarian reserve, yet should be only practiced by experienced IVF clinics. If no euploid embryo is available after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, a low-level mosaic embryo can be considered and prioritized for transfer after appropriate genetic counseling.

The morphokinetic signature of mosaic embryos: evidence in support of their own genetic identity

OBJECTIVE

To provide full morphokinetic characterization of embryos ranked with different degrees of chromosomal mosaicism.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization clinic.

PATIENT(S)

We analyzed 1,511 embryos from 424 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles by culturing embryos in a time-lapse imaging system and performing next-generation sequencing. We assessed 106 mosaic embryos.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Comparison of chromosomal, morphological, and morphokinetic characteristics of blastocysts classified as euploid, aneuploid, low-degree mosaic (30% to <50% aneuploid cells in trophectoderm biopsy), and high-degree mosaic (50% to <70% aneuploid cells in trophectoderm biopsy). Statistical analysis was performed using χ2, Kruskal-Wallis, or analysis of variance tests according to data type and distribution. A two-way random effects model was used to calculate interoperator correlation of annotations, and a logistic mixed effects model was performed to evaluate the effect of confounders on morphokinetic timing.

RESULT(S)

The mosaicism rate was ∼7% regardless of parental age. Mosaicism and uniform aneuploidies were not evenly distributed across chromosomes. The percentage of high-quality blastocysts significantly decreased from euploid (66.9%) to mosaic (52.8%) and aneuploid (47.7%). Aneuploid blastocysts significantly delayed development compared with euploid blastocysts in start of compaction (median, 84.72 hours postmicroinjection [hpm], interquartile range [IQR], 13.2; vs. median, 82.10 hpm, IQR, 11.5), start of blastulation (median, 101 hpm; IQR, 11.7; vs. median, 98.29 hpm, IQR, 10.5), and timing of blastocyst (median, 108.04 hpm, IQR, 11.50; vs. median, 104.71 hpm, IQR, 11.35). However, embryo morphokinetics were not correlated to the degree of mosaicism or to a mosaicism configuration that was apt for embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION(S)

Morphokinetic timing of mosaic embryos overlaps with that of euploid and aneuploid embryos, which may reflect their unique genetic and developmental identity. Although this suggests mosaic embryos are not simply a misdiagnosis by-product, further studies are needed to reveal the true identity of this particular type of embryo.

Progress and Challenges in Laboratory-Based Diagnostic and Screening Approaches for Aneuploidy Detection during Pregnancy

Aneuploidy is caused by problems during cellular division and segregation errors during meiosis that lead to an abnormal number of chromosomes and initiate significant genetic abnormalities during pregnancy or the loss of a fetus due to miscarriage. Screening and diagnostic technologies have been developed to detect this genetic condition and provide parents with critical information about their unborn child. In this review, we highlight the complexities of aneuploidy as a disease as well as multiple technological advancements in testing that help to identify aneuploidy at various time points throughout pregnancy. We focus on aneuploidy diagnosis during preimplantation genetic testing that is performed during in vitro fertilization as well as prenatal screening and diagnosis during pregnancy. This review focuses on DNA-based analysis and laboratory techniques for aneuploidy detection through reviewing molecular- and engineering-based technical advancements. We also present key challenges in aneuploidy detection during pregnancy, including sample collection, mosaic embryos, economic factors, and the social implications of this testing. The goal of this review is to synthesize broad information about aneuploidy screening and diagnostic sample collection and analysis during pregnancy and discuss major challenges the field is still facing despite decades of advancements.

Confined placental mosaicism and the association with pregnancy outcome and fetal growth: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal mosaicism can be detected in different stages of early life: in cleavage stage embryos, in blastocysts and biopsied cells from blastocysts during preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and later during prenatal testing, as well as after birth in cord blood. Mosaicism at all different stages can be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. There is an onward discussion about whether blastocysts diagnosed as chromosomally mosaic by PGT-A should be considered safe for transfer. An accurate diagnosis of mosaicism remains technically challenging and the fate of abnormal cells within an embryo remains largely unknown. However, if aneuploid cells persist in the extraembryonic tissues, they can give rise to confined placental mosaicism (CPM). Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) uses cell-free (cf) DNA released from the placenta in maternal blood, facilitating the detection of CPM. In literature, conflicting evidence is found about whether CPM is associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and/or other pregnancy outcomes. This makes counselling for patients by clinicians challenging and more knowledge is needed for clinical decision and policy making.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the association between CPM and prenatal growth and adverse pregnancy outcomes. All relevant literature has been reviewed in order to achieve an overview on merged results exploring the relation between CPM and FGR and other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

The following Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms and all their synonyms were used: placental, trophoblast, cytotrophoblast, mosaicism, trisomy, fetal growth, birth weight, small for gestational age and fetal development. A search in Embase, PubMed, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google Scholar databases was conducted. Relevant articles published until 16 July 2020 were critically analyzed and discussed.

OUTCOMES

There were 823 articles found and screened based on their title/abstract. From these, 213 articles were selected and full text versions were obtained for a second selection, after which 70 publications were included and 328 cases (fetuses) were analyzed. For CPM in eight different chromosomes (of the total 14 analyzed), there was sufficient evidence that birth weight was often below the 5th percentile of fetal growth standards. FGR was reported in 71.7% of CPM cases and preterm birth (<37 weeks of delivery) was reported in 31.0% of cases. A high rate of structural fetal anomalies, 24.2%, in cases with CPM was also identified. High levels of mosaicism in CVS and presence of uniparental disomy (UPD) were significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Based on the literature, the advice to clinicians is to monitor fetal growth intensively from first trimester onwards in case of CPM, especially when chromosome 2, 3, 7, 13, 15, 16 and 22 are involved. In addition to this, it is advised to examine the fetuses thoroughly for structural fetal anomalies and raise awareness of a higher chance of (possibly extreme) premature birth. Despite prematurity in nearly a fifth of cases, the long-term follow-up of CPM life borns seems to be positive. More understanding of the biological mechanisms behind CPM will help in prioritizing embryos for transfer after the detection of mosaicism in embryos through PGT-A.

Biological and Clinical Significance of Mosaicism in Human Preimplantation Embryos

Applications and indications of assisted reproduction technology are expanding, but every new approach is under scrutiny and thorough consideration. Recently, groups of assisted reproduction experts have presented data that support the clinical use of mosaic preimplantation embryos at the blastocyst stage, previously excluded from transfer. In the light of published contemporary studies, with or without clinical outcomes, there is growing evidence that mosaic embryos have the capacity for further in utero development and live birth. Our in-depth discussion will enable readers to better comprehend current developments. This expansion into the spectrum of ART practices requires further evidence and further theoretical documentation, basic research, and ethical support. Therefore, if strict criteria for selecting competent mosaic preimplantation embryos for further transfer, implantation, fetal growth, and healthy birth are applied, fewer embryos will be excluded, and more live births will be achieved. Our review aims to discuss the recent literature on the transfer of mosaic preimplantation embryos. It also highlights controversies as far as the clinical utilization of preimplantation embryos concerns. Finally, it provides the appropriate background to elucidate and highlight cellular and genetic aspects of this novel direction.

The birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: a case report

Mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies. The transfer of mosaic embryos is now considered to be a possible option for women undergoing ART with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and in the absence of euploid embryos, particularly those with diminished ovarian reserve and/or advanced maternal age. It can aid in avoiding the discard of potentially viable embryos, which might otherwise result in healthy babies. In over 500 studies on mosaicism, there have been no reports of mosaicism in babies born following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Here, we present a case report of a 39-year-old woman with diminished ovarian reserve with only one blastocyst available for trophectoderm biopsy. The transfer of the embryo, which showed 35% mosaicism of monosomy 2, resulted in pregnancy. Amniocentesis revealed a mosaic trisomic mos46,XX(98)/47,XX,+2(2) karyotype. There were no pathological findings in detailed ultrasonography, and the fetus showed a normal fetal growth with no evidence of intrauterine growth retardation. A healthy female baby was born at Week 37. The peripheral blood chromosome analysis validated with fluorescence in situ hybridization showed 2% mosaic monosomy 2 [mos45,XX,-2(2)/46,XX(98)]. This is the first reported case of true fetal mosaicism resulting in a live birth following the transfer of a known mosaic embryo. Worldwide, prenatal diagnosis has shown the depletion of mosaicism in embryos transferred after they have been reported as mosaics. Our case demonstrates the need for close prenatal monitoring and diagnosis by early amniocentesis, preferably at >14 weeks gestation.

Complex mosaic blastocysts after preimplantation genetic testing: prevalence and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the incidence of complex mosaic in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) blastocysts and can it be managed in clinical practice?

DESIGN

A retrospective study of PGT cycles conducted between January 2018 and October 2019 at a single centre. Biopsies of blastocysts were collected and analysed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Complex mosaic blastocysts were defined as those with three or more mosaic chromosomes. The cryopreserved complex mosaic blastocysts underwent a second round of biopsy, NGS analysis and vitrification. The euploid blastocysts identified by the re-biopsy were warmed again for embryo transfer. The main outcomes included the prevalence of the complex mosaic and the ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the complex mosaic was 2.4% (437/17,979). The prevalence of the complex mosaic was not associated with maternal age and morphological quality. A total of 89 complex mosaic blastocysts underwent re-biopsy and 96.6% (86/89) survived the first warming. For the re-biopsy samples, 61.6% (53/86) were euploid. The poor-quality blastocysts had higher rates of aneuploidy compared with good-quality blastocysts. The survival rate for blastocysts undergoing the second warming was 100% (18/18) and resulted in an ongoing pregnancy rate of 38.9% (7/18) as well as the birth of six healthy infants.

CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy may rescue blastocysts with development potential for transfer and improve the cumulative pregnancy rate per stimulation cycle in patients containing complex mosaic blastocysts.

Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion

Since the advent of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the 1990s, substantial changes in test methodology and technology now allow the detection and reporting of intermediate chromosome copy number (commonly referred to as mosaicism) for aneuploidy in a trophectoderm biopsy sample. Clinicians are grappling with how to interpret such findings and how to counsel patients about embryo transfer decision-making. This document reviews the available literature and outlines the various issues surrounding the reporting of intermediate copy number and consideration of storage or transfer of blastocysts with intermediate copy number results. This document does not endorse, nor does it suggest that PGT-A is appropriate for all cases of in vitro fertilization.

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes after Transfer of Mosaic Embryos: A Review

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) seeks to identify embryos with a normal chromosome complement during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Transfer of one euploid embryo at a time maximizes the chance of implantation while minimizing the risk of multiple pregnancy. The emergence of new technologies including next generation sequencing (NGS) has led to increased diagnosis of embryonic mosaicism, suggesting the presence of karyotypically distinct cells within a single trophectoderm (TE). Clinical implications of embryonic mosaicism are important in both naturally conceived and IVF pregnancies. Although information regarding outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer (MET) is limited, more than 100 live births have now been documented with rather reassuring outcomes with no abnormal phenotype. Here, we aim to provide a summary of recent data regarding clinical and neonatal outcomes after transfer of mosaic embryos in IVF/PGT-A cycles.

Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis

The diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in the preimplantation and prenatal stage is fraught with uncertainty and multiple factors need to be considered in order to gauge the likely impact. The clinical effects of chromosomal mosaicism are directly linked to the type of the imbalance (size, gene content, and copy number), the timing of the initial event leading to mosaicism during embryogenesis/fetal development, the distribution of the abnormal cells throughout the various tissues within the body as well as the ratio of normal/abnormal cells within each of those tissues. Additional factors such as assay noise and culture artifacts also have an impact on the significance and management of mosaic cases. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a liveborn with a chromosome abnormality and these risks differ according to the time of ascertainment and the tissue where the mosaic cells were initially discovered. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly. This review will discuss the clinical impact of finding mosaicism through: embryo biopsy, chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA.

Whether to transfer mosaic embryos: a cytogenetic view of true mosaicism by amniocentesis

RESEARCH QUESTION

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies has increasingly been employed for embryo selection, resulting in a recent surge in mosaic embryos. According to the cytogenetic results, which types of mosaic embryo survive early pregnancy, progress to the second trimester and finally result in a live birth?

DESIGN

This study evaluated 30,587 pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis from January 2004 to March 2020 at the cytogenic centre of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Samples from amniocentesis were cultured using the in-situ method. The types and distribution of level III chromosomal mosaicism (two or more cells with the same abnormality in two or more colonies and both culture dishes, clinically referred to as 'true mosaicism') were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 30,587 women, 78 cases (0.26%) of level III chromosomal mosaicism were identified. The types of chromosomal mosaicism were classified as sex chromosome mosaicism (SCM), autosomal chromosome mosaicism (ACM) and marker chromosome mosaicism (MCM), with SCM, ACM and MCM accounting for 58.97%, 32.05% and 8.97% of cases, respectively. The most common mosaic cell lines were monosomy X and trisomy 21. The most common mosaic cell line progressing to live birth was monosomy X.

CONCLUSIONS

Mosaic monosomy X and trisomy 21 are the most common cell lines of true mosaicism determined by amniocentesis. Monosomy X mosaicism is the most common cell line in live births. For women considering the transfer of these types of mosaic embryo in a circumstance where euploid embryos are unavailable, clinicians should provide careful prenatal counselling, detailed ultrasonography and amniocentesis.

Healthy Genetically Normal Live-Birth After Mosaic Chromosome 5 Embryo Transfer: A Case Report

Embryonic mosaicism is defined as two or more distinct cell lines within an embryo, which is originally developed from a zygote. Although the potential of mosaic embryos still remain unclear, recent reports have proved that mosaic embryo transfer can achieve healthy live-births. Up to now, there is no report of a live-birth having mosaic trisomy of full chromosome 5 following in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Our case is the first case proving that the transfer of medium-mosaicism embryo can result in a healthy live-birth. The couple are both carriers of balanced reciprocal translocations (46,XX,t(2;8)(p23;q24.3) and 46,XY,t(12;16)(q13.2;q23)). They had three IVF cycles combined with PGT-SR (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Structural Rearrangement). A total of 18 blastocysts were biopsied and no euploid embryo was found. After the conselling, the patients chose to transfer a 40% mosaic trisomy chromosome 5 embryo. The follow-up pregnancy including prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis and peripheral blood chromosome analysis of the newborn revealed no trisomy chromosome 5.

When embryology meets genetics: the definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryos (DIPE)-the consensus of two Italian scientific societies

A clear definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryo (DIPE) in literature is still missing, while several scientific societies are discussing this challenging topic. From both a clinical and scientific perspective, the identification of embryos unfit for reproductive purpose is crucial. This aim should be pursued in light of all diagnostic technologies for embryo evaluation, encompassing also genetic analyses, of recent implementation in IVF. The Italian context is characterized by an unusual scenario: embryos can be discarded only if not viable and cannot be used for research purposes either. Therefore, thousands of embryos, diagnosed as affected and/or aneuploid as resulting from preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and clinically not utilizable, are cryopreserved and stored indefinitely, with important psychological, legal, and financial implications. With the aim of updating the definition of DIPE, also on the basis of the embryo genetic status, the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR) and the Italian Society of Human Genetic (SIGU) reviewed the literature on this topic, found a consensus, and produced a list of relevant criteria.

Opinion de comité no 406 : Dépistage prénatal après FIV avec test génétique préimplantatoire des aneuploïdies

OBJECTIFS

Examiner l'approche du dépistage génétique prénatal et du diagnostic des anomalies chromosomiques dans les grossesses conçues par fécondation in vitro à la suite d'un test génétique préimplantatoire des aneuploïdies. PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Omnipraticiens, médecins de famille, obstétriciens, sages-femmes, infirmières, spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle, spécialistes en fertilité, conseillers en génétique, généticiens et autres professionnels de la santé qui participent au dépistage prénatal.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toute personne ou tout couple dont la grossesse est issue d'une fécondation in vitro et dont l'embryon a préalablement été soumis à un dépistage génétique préimplantatoire des aneuploïdies. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données Medline, PubMed et Cochrane Library pour extraire la littérature publiée au plus tard en septembre 2018. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES.

Prevalence, types and possible factors influencing mosaicism in IVF blastocysts: results from a single setting

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are intrinsic or extrinsic factors associated with embryo mosaicism prevalence in IVF cycles?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles carried out at a university-affiliated IVF clinic between October 2017 and October 2019. Trophectoderm biopsies were analysed by next generation sequencing. Mosaicism prevalence, type of anomaly and the chromosomes involved were analysed. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors potentially inducing mosaicism were studied: maternal and paternal age, antral follicle count, cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved, female body mass index, PGT-A indication, sperm concentration, total dosage of gonadotrophins, embryo quality and day of blastocyst formation, single-step commercial media used and biopsy operator.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of mosaicism in our PGT-A setting was 13.9%. In segmental mosaicism, larger chromosomes tended to be more affected, which was not observed in whole-chromosome mosaicism. Additionally, segmental mosaicism was mostly observed in monosomy (69.6%; P < 0.01) compared with whole-chromosome mosaicism (49.7% monosomies versus 50.3% trisomies; P = 0.83). Although a high inter-patient variability was observed, only paternal age showed a positive association with mosaicism (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.54) among the analysed variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest remarkable differences in the mechanisms generating segmental and whole-chromosome mosaicism, indicating that they may deserve different consideration when studying them and when prioritizing them for transfer. Male factor seems to be associated with mosaicism and may be worthy of specific assessment in future studies.

Clinical application of embryo aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencing

We review here the evolution in the field of embryo aneuploidy testing over the last 20 years, from the analysis of a subset of chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation to the transition toward a more comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes. This current comprehensive aneuploidy testing most commonly employs next-generation sequencing (NGS). We present our experience in over 130 000 embryo biopsies using this technology. The incidence of aneuploidy was lower in trophectoderm biopsies compared to cleavage-stage biopsies. We also confirmed by NGS that embryo aneuploidy rates increased with increasing maternal age, mostly attributable to an increase in complex aneuploid embryos. In contrast, the number of MII oocytes retrieved or the use of oocyte vitrification did not affect aneuploidy rates. Similarly, neither maternal age, oocyte number, nor oocyte vitrification affected the incidence of mosaicism. Analysis of clinical outcomes, indications, and potential benefits of embryo aneuploidy testing revealed advanced maternal age as the most favored group, with some evidence of improved delivery rate per transfer as well as decreased miscarriage rates and time to pregnancy. Other indications are: recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failure, severe male factor, previous trisomic pregnancy, and good prognosis patients mainly undergoing single embryo transfer, with the latter indication used to reduce the occurrence of multiple pregnancies without compromising cycle outcome. In conclusion, NGS has become the most appropriate technology for aneuploidy testing in trophectoderm biopsies, with accurate results, high throughput, and cost efficiency. This technology can be also applied to the analysis of the embryonic cell free DNA released to the culture media at blastocyst stage. This is a promising approach towards a non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy.

Committee Opinion No. 406: Prenatal Testing After IVF With Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To review the approach to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization and following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

INTENDED USERS

General practitioners, family physicians, obstetricians, midwives, nurses, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, fertility specialists, genetic counsellors, geneticists, and other health care providers involved in prenatal screening.

TARGET POPULATION

All individuals or couples who conceivd through in vitro fertilization and underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

EVIDENCE

Literature published in or before September 2018 was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. SUMMARY STATEMENTS.

The Pregnancy Outcome of Mosaic Embryo Transfer: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis

Chromosomal mosaicism is at high occurrence in early developmental-stage embryos, but much lower in those at prenatal stage. Recent studies provided evidence on the viability of mosaic embryos by reporting pregnancy outcomes. Expanded research is warranted to evaluate its clinical significance. This is a multi-center prospective cohort study on 137 mosaic, 476 euploid and 835 non-preimplantation genetic testing (non-PGT) embryos from three in vitro fertilization (IVF) providers of three countries in Asia, applying the same preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) reporting criteria. Mosaic embryo transfers (METs) resulted in a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate (40.1% versus 59.0% versus 48.4%), lower ongoing/live birth rate (27.1% versus 47.0% versus 35.1%) and higher miscarriage rate (33.3% versus 20.5% versus 27.4%) than euploid and non-PGT transfers, respectively. Pregnancy losses after METs were different between embryos carrying numerical and segmental chromosomal abnormalities (p = 0.04). Our meta-analysis concluded that METs gave rise to pregnancies but were associated with a reduced ongoing/live birth rate and a higher miscarriage rate. All 37 MET live births were confirmed viable, among which 8 completed prenatal genetic testing with normal results. Longitudinal investigation on one MET pregnancy evidenced the aneuploidy depletion hypothesis. This is the first multi-center prospective study reporting a full MET pregnancy outcome with complementary information from prenatal genetic testing as compared to euploid and non-PGT cohorts.

Aneuploidy in first trimester chorionic villi and spontaneous abortions: Windows into the origin and fate of aneuploidy through embryonic and fetal development

OBJECTIVE

To review the mosaic autosomal trisomies in chorionic villi sample (CVS) trophoblasts, mesenchyme, and both cell lineages and to compare them with trisomies in spontaneous abortions.

METHODS

Mosaic autosomal trisomies from 76 102 diagnostic CVS tests were classified as involving trophoblasts, involving mesenchyme, or present in both. Autosomal trisomies in products of conception were based on 18 published studies. We evaluated correlates between trisomy frequency with chromosome size or number of protein coding genes in the imbalance.

RESULTS

Distinctly different patterns of trisomy were found in trophoblasts, mesenchyme, or both. In trisomic spontaneous abortions, there was a weak, borderline significant, inverse association between frequency and trisomic chromosome size and also with the number of protein coding genes involved (r = 0.43, P = 0.04 and r = 0.39, P = 0.07, respectively). These associations became stronger after excluding trisomy 16 (r = 0.52, P = 0.01 and r = 0.64, P = 0.001, respectively). Only CVS trisomies in both trophoblasts and mesenchyme resembled the trisomies found in spontaneous abortions and these were also associated with chromosome size and protein coding genes (r = 0.42, P = 0.05 and r = 0.57, P = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The abnormalities seen in CVS differ from those reported in early embryos. From conception through birth, there are lineage-specific, evolving spectrums of aneuploidy in trophoblasts, mesenchyme, and fetus.