Is early initiation of infertility treatment justified in women over the age of 35 years?

Return rate following a live birth obtained with ART: frequency and determinants

PURPOSE

To understand how often couples return to ART centres for a second child.

METHODS

Retrospective monocentric cohort study including women who had a first live birth with IVF. The primary objective was to assess the rate of those returning for a second child within five years of the previous pregnancy. The secondary aim was to disentangle the determinants of this rate.

RESULTS

A total of 374 patients were included, of whom 188 returned (50%, 95% CI 45-55%). Among those who did not return (n = 186), four (2%) referred to another ART Center and 24 were unreachable. Of the 158 contacted subjects that did not refer for ART, 53 (34%, 95% CI 27-41%) conceived naturally, 57 (36%, 95% CI 29-44%) abandoned their intent of parenthood, and 48 (30%, 95% CI 24-38%) unsuccessfully attempted natural conception. These 48 women (13%) who expressed interest in a second child but did not undergo ART were compared to those seeking a second pregnancy through ART. Baseline characteristics were similar except for an older age (Median 36, IQR: 34-38 vs 34, IQR: 32-36, p = 0.001). Additionally, in terms of IVF cycle characteristics, women who did not return were more likely to achieve their first pregnancy with a fresh transfer rather than a frozen transfer (75% vs 59%, p = 0.05). They also had a higher number of retrieved oocytes (Median 10, IQR: 7-13 vs 9, IQR: 5-12) and less frequently cryopreserved embryos (27% vs 52%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of couples who have conceived with ART and who are interested in having a second child is high. Our results underline the importance of paying more attention to the number of intended children, as this information could influence clinical management.

Age affects the association between socioeconomic status and infertility: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown the interaction between age and socioeconomic status (SES) on the risk of infertility in the UK, but the association is still unclear in the United States. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of age on the relationship between SES and the risk of infertility in American women.

METHODS

The study included adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2013 to 2018. The poverty income ratio (PIR) was used to represent the SES of the population. With participants stratified according to age category (< 35 years; ≥ 35 years), we further assessed differences in the relationship between PIR and infertility risk among participants of different age groups using multivariate logistic regression and interaction tests.

RESULTS

Approximately 3,273 participants were enrolled in the study. There were 399 cases of infertility and 2,874 cases without infertility. In women ≥ 35 years of age, PIR levels were significantly higher in infertile participants than in non-infertile participants, but no such difference was found in those < 35 years of age. The association of PIR with the risk of infertility appeared to differ between age < 35 years and age ≥ 35 years (OR: 0.99, 95%Cl: 0.86-1.13 vs. OR: 1.24, 95%Cl: 1.12-1.39) in a fully adjusted model. Furthermore, an interaction between age and PIR increased the risk of infertility (p-value for interaction < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that age may influence the association between PIR and infertility. It is imperative to perform further studies to provide more evidence.

The modest impact of assisted reproductive technology on the second birth: insights from a population-based study in Lombardy, Northern Italy

BACKGROUND

In the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART), family rate is a neglected but emerging issue. The aim of the study was to investigate the epidemiological impact of ART on the second birth during the period 2007-2020 in Lombardy, Northern Italy.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using administrative data from regional healthcare databases of Lombardy including first and second births occurred from 2007 to 2020. The proportion of deliveries after ART was calculated separately among first and second births. The probability of undergoing ART to achieve second birth compared to first one was estimated computing odds ratio (OR), crude and adjusted for maternal age, education, and nationality. We also assessed changes with age and calendar period.

RESULTS

We obtained a cohort including 553,190 first births and 317,976 second births. The proportion of ART babies among first and second births was 4.3% and 1.0% respectively (p < 0.001). The probability of undergoing ART to achieve second birth compared to first one, adjusted for age, education, and nationality, was 0.14 (95%CI: 0.13-0.15). The proportion of deliveries after ART increased with maternal age and along the calendar period but remained always markedly higher among first births rather than among second births.

CONCLUSION

ART played a significantly lower role in the determinism of the conception of a second birth in comparison to the conception of a first one.

ART and the forgotten siblings: a call for research

A broader definition of infertility is the incapacity to have the intended number of children. However, most literature on ART exclusively focuses on live birth as an outcome, rather than on the capacity to fully realize the reproductive wishes of the couples. This issue has probably received scant attention because the total fertility rate is below replacement levels in affluent countries, and one may simplistically assume that only a minority of couples may be interested in more than one child. This assumption, however, is unproven and presumably erroneous. Unfortunately, evidence on the rate of return in couples who conceived their first child with ART is scant and information on the intended number of children in infertile couples is lacking. In general, we plea for more research on this subject. The documentation of an intended number of children above two and a high return rate in infertile couples may lead to changes in clinical practice, such as the storage of oocytes or embryos prior to initiating embryo transfers. This could improve the chance of conceiving the second child when the couple comes back some years later. In addition, the identification of the determinants for non-return as well as those explaining the gap between the intended and the realized number of children may reveal specific barriers and possibly how to tackle them. However, at present, available evidence is insufficient to advocate any intervention. Thorough research is warranted.

Surgery versus IVF for the treatment of infertility associated to ovarian and deep endometriosis (SVIDOE: Surgery Versus IVF for Deep and Ovarian Endometriosis). Clinical protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

The management of endometriosis-related infertility is still a challenging issue. Women can be managed with either surgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF). The decision is tailored to the patients considering pros and cons of both approaches. Surgery might increase the chances of natural conception and relieve symptoms. IVF may be more effective, but costs are higher and unoperated women face some peculiar additional risks during the procedure and pregnancy. The unavailability of randomized trials comparing the two strategies hampers the possibility to provide precise estimates. This Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) aims at filling this gap. This is a multicenter, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial with parallel groups and allocation 1:1. Three Italian Academic Infertility Units will be involved. Main inclusion criteria are infertility for more than one year, age less than 40 years and a sonographic diagnosis of endometriosis (ovarian endometriomas or deep peritoneal lesions). Previous IVF and previous surgery for endometriosis are exclusion criteria. Women will be randomized to either surgery and then natural pregnancy seeking or a standard program of three IVF cycles. The primary aim is the comparison of live birth rate between the two groups (IVF versus surgery) within one year of randomization. The secondary aim is the evaluation of cost-effective profile of the two interventions. The present study can influence the clinical practice of infertility treatment in women with endometriosis. From a public health perspective, information on the more cost-effective clinical management strategy would consent a wiser allocation of resources.

Trial registration:NCT04743167, registered on 8 February 2021.

Cryopreservation in reproductive medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: rethinking policies and European safety regulations

Cryopreservation of reproductive cells and tissues represents an essential aspect of ART practices that might be particularly strategic and helpful during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emergency. However, recommendations on how and when to preserve reproductive tissues and cells during a novel severe pandemic are scanty. This article uses a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis to identify favourable and unfavourable factors and to recognize challenges and obstacles related to the use of cryopreservation procedures during the spreading of a new virus. One of the strengths associated with the cryopreservation is represented by the availability of robust European guidelines on storage safety to prevent sample contamination or cross-contamination by pathogens. These recommendations should be deep-rooted in all ART laboratories. Weaknesses include uncertainties regarding the management of COVID-19 affected asymptomatic patients, the suboptimal accuracy of diagnostic tests for the disease, the nebulous prospective regarding the duration of the pandemic and the additional costs. The application of the strategy represents an opportunity to postpone pregnancy in order to avoid a severe infectious disease during gestation while concomitantly counteracting the possible detrimental effect of time. Critical threats, at present still undefined, are represented by potential adverse events for the mother and offspring due to infected gametes or embryos after thawing and, subsequently, the re-spreading of the virus.