Is endometriosis due to evolutionary maladaptation?

Is retrograde menstruation a universal, recurrent, physiological phenomenon? A systematic review of the evidence in humans and non-human primates

STUDY QUESTION

What are the quantitative, qualitative, and temporal patterns of retrograde mentruation?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The extreme quantitative and qualitative heterogeneity of the available studies prevents the definitive conclusion that retrograde menstruation is a universal and consistent phenomenon during the reproductive period.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Retrograde menstruation has been defined as a universal, physiological phenomenon that occurs similarly in about 90% of menstruators during the reproductive period. However, uncertainties still exist in terms of the event frequency, total amount, and cellular composition of retrograde menstruation and the differences between individuals with versus those without endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

Two systematic reviews were performed, one for human studies, and one for non-human primate studies. We retrieved studies from the PubMed and Embase databases published between 1 January 1980 and 1 November 2023. Studies published in the English language were included and identified using a combination of MeSH terms. References from relevant publications were systematically screened and further articles were identified using PubMed's 'similar articles' and 'cited by' functions.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Results were reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that did not report original data or provided a review of the field were excluded. Bias analysis was completed for each included human study by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Fifteen studies were finally included in the human systematic review, mostly with limited sample sizes. The macroscopic visualization of blood in PF during menses was reported with a frequency ranging from 9% to 100%. A prevalence of endometrial cells detected in peritoneal fluid ranging from 8% to 75% was reported in the various studies. Controversial findings were reported in relation to patients with endometriosis. Retrograde menstruation has been evaluated cross-sectionally on single occasions, and no information is available on the course of the phenomenon within an entire cycle and between subsequent cycles. Two studies were included in the non-human primate systematic review; one of them showed that retrograde menstruation was observed more frequently in baboons with naturally occurring endometriosis (83%) than in those with a normal pelvis (51%).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

In humans, peritoneal fluid has often been collected at different cycle phases and not systematically during menstruation. The indication for laparoscopy was not always clear for all participants. A wide variety of methods were used to detect endometrial cells, including cytological staining, cell block analysis, immunocytochemistry, and various methods of cell culture.

WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS

The idea that almost all women experience retrograde menstruation regularly and similarly during their reproductive life is currently unsubstantiated. It is an academic notion accepted uncritically. Development of endometriosis may derive from differences in the frequency or severity of the event.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The review was partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health-Current Research IRCCS. P.Vi. serves as co-editor in Chief of Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders. E.S. serves as Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open and discloses research grants from Ferring, Ibsa, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex, and honoraria from Ibsa and Gedeon Richter. P.Ve. serves as Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open; is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, of the Italian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and of the International Editorial Board of Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer for chapters on endometriosis management in the clinical decision support resource UpToDate; and maintains both a public and private gynecological practice. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

How do women get endometriosis?

How do women get endometriosis? This question has baffled investigators for nearly a century, and the pathogenesis of endometriosis remains an enigma to this day. While Sampson's retrograde menstruation theory is widely accepted, the gaping divide between the near-ubiquity of retrograde menstruation and the moderate prevalence of endometriosis has been difficult to explain. Now, Mumusoglu and Hsueh have provided some much-needed clues by proposing that endometriosis is likely a result of maladaptation of the evolutionary baggage to dramatically changed societies and cultures. These changes are profound, sweeping and across the board, resulting in myriad mismatches between the evolutionary legacy and the changed societies, which, in turn, have generated many potential risk factors for endometriosis that were completely absent in hunter-gatherer societies. These risk factors could conceivably account for the glaring gap between the ubiquity of retrograde menstruation and the moderate prevalence of endometriosis. This perspective may force the viewing of endometriosis from a fresh angle, providing a roadmap for future epidemiological studies, and potentially providing the prospect of development of novel ways for disease prevention and treatment.