Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rectal Cancer

Feasibility of Three-Dimension Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Predicting Tumor and Node Staging in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: An Exploration of Optimal ROI Measurement

To investigate the feasibility of predicting rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) tumor (T) and node (N) staging from an optimal ROI measurement using amide proton transfer weighted-signal intensity (APTw-SI) and magnetization transfer (MT) derived from three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer(3D-CEST). Fifty-eight RA patients with pathological TN staging underwent 3D-CEST and DWI. APTw-SI, MT, and ADC values were measured using three ROI approaches (ss-ROI, ts-ROI, and wt-ROI) to analyze the TN staging (T staging, T1-2 vs T3-4; N staging, N - vs N +); the reproducibility of APTw-SI and MT was also evaluated. The AUC was used to assess the staging performance and determine the optimal ROI strategy. MT and APTw-SI yielded good excellent reproducibility with three ROIs, respectively. Significant differences in MT were observed (all P < 0.05) from various ROIs but not in APTw-SI and ADC (all P > 0.05) in the TN stage. AUCs of MT from ss-ROI were 0.860 (95% CI, 0.743-0.937) and 0.852 (95% CI, 0.735-0.932) for predicting T and N staging, which is similar to ts-ROI (T staging, 0.856 [95% CI, 0.739-0.934]; N staging, 0.831 [95% CI, 0.710-0.917]) and wt-ROI (T staging, 0.833 [95% CI, 0.712-0.918]; N staging, 0.848 [95% CI, 0.729-0.929]) (all P > 0.05). MT value of 3D-CEST has excellent TN staging predictive performance in RA patients with all three kinds of ROI methods. The ss-ROI is easy to operate and could be served as the preferred ROI approach for clinical and research applications of 3D-CEST imaging.

How to Study the Location and Size of Rectal Tumors That Are Candidates for Local Surgery: Rigid Rectoscopy, Magnetic Resonance, Endorectal Ultrasound or Colonoscopy? An Interobservational Study

1.

BACKGROUND

Preoperative staging of rectal lesions for transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) comprises digital rectal examination, intraoperative rigid rectoscopy (IRR), endorectal ultrasound (EUS), colonoscopy and rectal magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI). The gold standard for topographic features is IRR. Are the results of the other tests sufficiently reliable to eliminate the need for IRR? rMRI is a key test in advanced rectal cancer and is not operator-dependent. Description of anatomical landmarks is variable. Can we rely on the information regarding topographic features provided by all radiologists? 2.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a concordance interobservational study involving four diagnostic tests of anatomical characteristics of rectal lesions (colonoscopy, EUS, rectal MRI and IRR), performed by four expert radiologists, regarding topographic rectal features with rMRI. 3.

RESULTS

Fifty-five rectal tumors were operated on by using TES. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge, location by quadrants, size by quadrants and size of tumor were assessed (IRR as gold standard). For most of the tumors, the correlation between IRR and colonoscopy or EUS was very good (ICC > 0.75); the correlation between rMRI and IRR in respect of the size by quadrants (ICC = 0.092) and location by quadrants (ICC = 0.292) was weak. Topographic landmarks studied by the expert radiologists had an excellent correlation, except for distance from the peritoneal reflection to the anal verge (ICC = 0.606). 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical description of rectal lesions by IRR, EUS, colonoscopy and rMRI is reliable. Topographic data obtained by EUS and colonoscopy can serve as a reference to avoid IRR. Determination of these topographic data by rMRI is less reliable. As performed by the expert radiologists, the anatomical study by rMRI is accurate and reproducible.

Diagnostic Performance of Rectal CT for Staging Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Rectal MRI and Histopathology

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of rectal CT with that of high-resolution rectal MRI and histopathology in assessing rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-seven patients with rectal cancer who underwent rectal CT with rectal distension using sonographic gel and high-resolution MRI were enrolled in this study. The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction, distance to the mesorectal fascia (MRF), extramural depth (EMD), extramesorectal lymph node (LN) involvement, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and T/N stages in rectal CT/MRI were analyzed by two gastrointestinal radiologists. The CT findings of 20 patients who underwent radical surgery without concurrent chemoradiotherapy were compared using histopathology. Interclass correlations and kappa statistics were used.

Results

The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction showed an excellent intraclass correlation between CT and MRI for both reviewers. For EMD, the distance to the MRF, presence of LNs, extramesorectal LN metastasis, EMVI, T stage, and intermodality kappa or weighted kappa values between CT and MRI showed excellent agreement. Among the 20 patients who underwent radical surgery, T staging, circumferential resection margin involvement, EMVI, and LN metastasis on rectal CT showed acceptable concordance rates with histopathology.

Conclusion

Dedicated rectal CT may be on par with rectal MRI in providing critical information to patients with rectal cancer.

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions

According to the main international clinical guidelines, the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR. Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL), which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity, including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery is omitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with a specific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the early identification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questions about this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiological criteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal follow-up protocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review, we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in this clinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and the controversies surrounding this treatment approach.

Primary and post-chemoradiotherapy staging using MRI in rectal cancer: the role of diffusion imaging in the assessment of perirectal infiltration

PURPOSE

To analyze changes in MRI diagnostic accuracy in main rectal tumor (T) evaluation resulting from the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), according to the degree of experience of the radiologist.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of a database including one hundred 1.5 T MRI records (2011-2016) from patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer, including primary staging and post-chemoradiotherapy follow-up. All cases were individually blindedly reviewed by ten radiologists: three experienced in rectal cancer, three specialized in other areas, and four residents. Each case was assessed twice to detect perirectal infiltration: first, evaluating just high-resolution T2-weighted sequences (HRT2w); second, evaluation of DWI plus HRT2w sequences. Results were pooled by experience, calculating accuracy (area under ROC curve), sensitivity and specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and overstaging/understaging. Histology of surgical specimens provided the reference standard.

RESULTS

DWI significantly improved specificity by experienced radiologists in primary staging (63.2% to 75.9%) and, to a lesser extent, positive likelihood ratio (2.06 to 2.87); minimal changes were observed post-chemoradiotherapy, with a slight decrease of accuracy (0.657 to 0.626). Inexperienced radiologists showed a similar pattern, but with slight enhancement post-chemoradiotherapy (accuracy 0.604 to 0.621). Residents experienced small changes, with increased sensitivity/decreased specificity in both primary (69% to 72%/67.2% to 64.7%) and post-chemoradiotherapy (68.1% to 73.6%/47.3% to 44.6%) staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding DWI to HRT2w significantly improved specificity for the detection of perirectal infiltration at primary staging by experienced radiologists and also by inexperienced ones, although to a lesser extent. In the post-neoadjuvant treatment subgroup, only minimal changes were observed.

How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Modern rectal cancer management is dependent on preoperative staging, and radiological assessment is a crucial part of this process. Imaging must provide sufficient information to guide preoperative decision-making that is reliable and reproducible. Different methods have been used for local staging; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be the most reliable tool for this purpose. MRI offers prognostic information about the patients and guides the decision between neoadjuvant treatment and total mesorectal excision alone. Also, not only the initial staging but also restaging by MRI can provide significant information regarding tumor response that is essential when considering alternative approaches.

Tumor stage in patients operated for rectal cancer: a comparison of the pre-operative MR and the resection specimen, with specific attention to the effect of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Evaluate the preoperative TN stage with MR and the postoperative stage with histology.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer (2002-2015) and a pre-operative MR were included. A chart review was done. Pathology reports were evaluated for the post-operative tumor stage. Down staging was defined as a lower disease stage in the resection specimen compared with the pre-operative MR. Upgrading ("progression") was defined as a higher disease stage in the resection specimen. The study was approved by ethical committee of the Zaans Medisch Centrum.

RESULTS

From 176 out of 231 operated patients a pre-operative MR was available for evaluation. 142 patients (80.7%) underwent neo-adjuvant treatment; the remainder 19.3% underwent immediate surgery. Neo-adjuvant therapy resulted in significant down staging. However, almost 14% of patients had a higher TN stage as determined by the pre-operative MR. In patients who underwent immediate surgery the percentage with "progression" was 30%. The number of patients with stage 1 and 2 were higher in the group not treated with neo-adjuvant therapy. There was no significant difference in tumor stage as determined by histological examination of the resection specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of the MR is not perfect. Underestimation as well as overestimation of the tumor occurred both in the patients treated with radiotherapy as well as those who underwent immediate operation. As such, MR results should be interpreted with caution when devising a treatment strategy.

PET/MR Imaging in Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract

PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an established hybrid imaging technique for staging and follow-up of gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies, especially for colorectal carcinoma. Dedicated hybrid PET/MR imaging scanners are currently available for clinical use. Although they will not replace regular use of PET/CT, they may have utility in selected cases of GI tract malignancies. The superior soft tissue contrast resolution and depiction of anatomy and the functional information obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provided by MR imaging in PET/MR imaging are advantages over CT of PET/CT for T staging and follow-up of rectal carcinoma and for better characterization of liver lesions. Functional information from DWI and use of liver-specific MR imaging contrast agents are an added advantage in follow-up of liver metastases after systemic and locoregional treatment. New radiotracers will improve the utility of PET/MR imaging in staging and follow-up of tumors, which may not be [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose avid, such as hepatocellular carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. PET/MR imaging also has application in selected cases of cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and pancreatic carcinoma for initial staging and follow-up assessment.

Comparison of hybrid FDG PET/MRI compared with PET/CT in colorectal cancer staging and restaging: a pilot study

PURPOSE

We report our initial clinical experience from a pilot study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid PET/MRI with PET/CT in colorectal cancer and discuss potential PET/MRI workflow solutions for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients underwent both FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI (Ingenuity TF PET/MRI, Philips Healthcare) for rectal cancer staging or colorectal cancer restaging. The PET acquisition of PET/MRI was similar to that of PET/CT whereas the MRI protocol was selected individually based on the patient's medical history. One nuclear medicine physician reviewed the PET/CT studies and one radiologist reviewed the PET/MRI studies independently. The diagnostic accuracy of each modality was determined in consensus, using available medical records as a reference.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients enrolled, two were for initial staging and ten for restaging. The median scan delay between the two modalities was 60 min. The initial imaging was PET/CT in nine patients and PET/MRI in three patients. When PET/CT was performed first, the SUV values of the 16 FDG avid lesions were greater at PET/MRI than at PET/CT. In contrast, when PET/MRI was performed first, the SUV values of the seven FDG avid lesions were greater at PET/CT than at PET/MRI. PET/MRI provided more detailed T staging than PET/CT. On a per-patient basis, with both patient groups combined for the evaluation of N and M staging/restaging, the true positive rate was 5/7 (71%) for PET/CT and 6/7 (86%) for PET/MRI, and true negative rate was 5/5 (100%) for both modalities. On a per-lesion basis, PET/CT identified 26 of 29 (90%) tumor lesions that were correctly detected by PET/MRI. Our proposed workflow allows for comprehensive cancer staging including integrated local and whole-body assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience shows a high diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI in T staging of rectal cancer compared with PET/CT. In addition, PET/MRI shows at least comparable accuracy in N and M staging as well as restaging to PET/CT. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results. It is expected that PET/MRI would yield higher diagnostic accuracy than PET/CT considering the high soft tissue contrast provided by MRI compared with CT, but larger studies are necessary to fully assess the benefit of PET/MRI in colorectal cancer.

Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review

AIM

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is found in 20% of patients with rectal cancer undergoing long-course chemoradiotherapy. Some authors have suggested that these patients do not need to undergo surgery and can be managed with careful follow-up, with surgery only used in the event of clinical failure. Widespread adoption of this regimen is limited by the accuracy of methods to confirm a pathological complete response (pCR).

METHOD

A systematic search of PubMed, Medline and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify clinical, histological and radiological features in those patients with rectal cancer who achieved a pCR following chemoradiotherapy. Searches were conducted with the following keywords and MeSH search terms: 'rectal neoplasm', 'response', 'neoadjuvant', 'preoperative chemoradiation' and 'tumour response'. After review of title and abstracts, 89 articles addressing the assessment of pCR were identified.

RESULTS

Histology and clinical assessment are the most effective methods of assessment of pCR, with histology considered the gold standard. Clinical assessment is limited to low rectal tumours and is open to significant inter-rater variability, while histological examination requires a surgical specimen. Diffusion-weighted MRI and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT demonstrate the greatest potential for the assessment of pCR, but both modalities have limited accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Determination of a pCR is crucial if a nonoperative approach is to be undertaken proactively. Various methods are available, but currently they lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to define management. This is likely to be an area of further research in the future.

Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and positron emission tomography (PET) are complementary imaging modalities in the preoperative staging of patients with rectal cancer, and each offers their own individual strengths and weaknesses. MRI is the best available radiologic modality for the local staging of rectal cancers, and can play an important role in accurately distinguishing which patients should receive preoperative chemoradiation prior to total mesorectal excision. Alternatively, both MDCT and PET are considered primary modalities when performing preoperative distant staging, but are limited in their ability to locally stage rectal malignancies. This review details the role of each of these three modalities in rectal cancer staging, and how the three imaging modalities can be used in conjunction.

Rectal cancer in inflammatory bowel diseases: MR imaging findings

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the MR imaging features of rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MR imaging examinations of 13 patients with IBD-related rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. MR imaging included T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DW), and gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging. MR imaging findings were analyzed and compared with endoscopic and histopathological findings.

RESULTS

Eight patients (8/13; 62%) had active IBD and five (5/13; 38%) had quiescent IBD on MR imaging. Two different tumor patterns were individualized including clearly visible soft-tissue mass (4/13; 31%) (Type 1 tumor) and marked circumferential rectal wall thickening (9/13; 69%) (Type 2 tumor). Twelve tumors (12/13; 92%) showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. All six tumors studied with DW-MR imaging (6/6; 100%) showed high signal on DW-MR imaging with restricted diffusion on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. On gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging, heterogeneous enhancement was observed in one tumor (1/13; 8%), whereas 12 tumors (12/13; 92%) showed homogeneous enhancement. MR imaging showed pelvic fistula and intrapelvic abscess in association with four (4/13; 31%) and two tumors (2/13; 15%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our limited retrospective study demonstrates that rectal cancer in IBD patients can present as a circumferential wall thickening resembling inflammation and can occur in the absence of fistula or abscess. The use of T2-weighted and DW-MR imaging is recommended to improve rectal cancer detection in patients with long-standing IBD.

Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer

Rectal cancer is a common cancer and a major cause of mortality in Western countries. Accurate staging is essential for determining the optimal treatment strategies and planning appropriate surgical procedures to control rectal cancer. Endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) is suitable for assessing the extent of tumor invasion, particularly in early-stage or superficial rectal cancer cases. In advanced cases with distant metastases, computed tomography (CT) is the primary approach used to evaluate the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to assess preoperative staging and the circumferential resection margin involvement, which assists in evaluating a patient’s risk of recurrence and their optimal therapeutic strategy. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT may be useful in detecting occult synchronous tumors or metastases at the time of initial presentation. Restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains a challenge with all modalities because it is difficult to reliably differentiate between the tumor mass and other radiation-induced changes in the images. EUS does not appear to have a useful role in post-therapeutic response assessments. Although CT is most commonly used to evaluate treatment responses, its utility for identifying and following-up metastatic lesions is limited. Preoperative high-resolution MRI in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging, and/or PET-CT could provide valuable prognostic information for rectal cancer patients with locally advanced disease receiving preoperative CRT. Based on these results, we conclude that a combination of multimodal imaging methods should be used to precisely assess the restaging of rectal cancer following CRT.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the gut: a primer for the luminal gastroenterologist

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established for imaging the solid organs of the abdomen and pelvis. In recent years it has been having an increasingly important role in the evaluation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Fluoroscopy and abdominal computed tomography, the traditional mainstays of bowel imaging, remain valuable; however, the contemporary emphasis on decreasing patient radiation exposure is driving practice toward non-ionizing modalities such as MRI. The inherent dynamic properties of MRI, its superior tissue contrast, and cross-sectional capabilities offer additional advantages. Here we review, from esophagus to anus, techniques and indications for MRI of the GI lumen with an emphasis on the normal MRI appearance of the GI tract and commonly encountered pathology.

Current approaches and challenges for monitoring treatment response in colon and rectal cancer

Introduction: With the advent of multidisciplinary and multimodality approaches to the management of colorectal cancer patients, there is an increasing need to define how we monitor response to novel therapies in these patients. Several factors ranging from the type of therapy used to the intrinsic biology of the tumor play a role in tumor response. All of these can aid in determining the ideal course of treatment, and may fluctuate over time, pending down-staging or progression of disease. Therefore, monitoring how disease responds to therapy requires standardization in order to ultimately optimize patient outcomes. Unfortunately, how best to do this remains a topic of debate among oncologists, pathologists, and colorectal surgeons. There may not be one single best approach. The goal of the present article is to shed some light on current approaches and challenges to monitoring treatment response for colorectal cancer.

Methods: A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed and the OVID library. Key-word combinations included colorectal cancer metastases, neoadjuvant therapy, rectal cancer, imaging modalities, CEA, down-staging, tumor response, and biomarkers. Directed searches of the embedded references from the primary articles were also performed in selected circumstances.

Results: Pathologic examination of the post-treatment surgical specimen is the gold standard for monitoring response to therapy. Endoscopy is useful for evaluating local recurrence, but not in assessing tumor response outside of the limited information gained by direct examination of intra-lumenal lesions. Imaging is used to monitor tumors throughout the body for response, with CT, PET, and MRI employed in different circumstances. Overall, each has been validated in the monitoring of patients with colorectal cancer and residual tumors.

Conclusion: Although there is no imaging or serum test to precisely correlate with a tumor's response to chemo- or radiation therapy, these modalities, when used in combination, can aid in allowing clinicians to adjust medical therapy, pursue operative intervention, or (in select cases) identify complete responders. Improvements are needed, however, as advances across multiple modalities could allow appropriate selection of patients for a close surveillance regimen in the absence of operative intervention.

Anorectal anatomy and imaging techniques

The rectum and anus are two anatomically complex organs with diverse pathologies. This article reviews the basic anatomy of the rectum and anus. In addition, it addresses the current radiographic techniques used to evaluate these structures, specifically ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and defecography.