1
|
Fatima GN, Fatma H, Saraf SK. Vaccines in Breast Cancer: Challenges and Breakthroughs. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2175. [PMID: 37443570 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a problem for women's health globally. Early detection techniques come in a variety of forms ranging from local to systemic and from non-invasive to invasive. The treatment of cancer has always been challenging despite the availability of a wide range of therapeutics. This is either due to the variable behaviour and heterogeneity of the proliferating cells and/or the individual's response towards the treatment applied. However, advancements in cancer biology and scientific technology have changed the course of the cancer treatment approach. This current review briefly encompasses the diagnostics, the latest and most recent breakthrough strategies and challenges, and the limitations in fighting breast cancer, emphasising the development of breast cancer vaccines. It also includes the filed/granted patents referring to the same aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gul Naz Fatima
- Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Babu Banarasi Das Northern India Institute of Technology, Lucknow 226028, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Hera Fatma
- Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Babu Banarasi Das Northern India Institute of Technology, Lucknow 226028, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shailendra K Saraf
- Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Babu Banarasi Das Northern India Institute of Technology, Lucknow 226028, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Baelen K, Geukens T, Maetens M, Tjan-Heijnen V, Lord CJ, Linn S, Bidard FC, Richard F, Yang WW, Steele RE, Pettitt SJ, Van Ongeval C, De Schepper M, Isnaldi E, Nevelsteen I, Smeets A, Punie K, Voorwerk L, Wildiers H, Floris G, Vincent-Salomon A, Derksen PWB, Neven P, Senkus E, Sawyer E, Kok M, Desmedt C. Current and future diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:769-785. [PMID: 35605746 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers. DESIGN Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials. RESULTS At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC. CONCLUSION ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Van Baelen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Tjan-Heijnen
- Medical Oncology Department, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), School of GROW, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Linn
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Departments of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F-C Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, UVSQ/Paris-Saclav University, Paris, France
| | - F Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W W Yang
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R E Steele
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Van Ongeval
- Departments of Radiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Isnaldi
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - A Smeets
- Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Voorwerk
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Wildiers
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Floris
- Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - P W B Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Neven
- Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - E Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Kok
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pérez Fuentes JA, Roldán Sánchez VS, Gordillo Ledesma AK, Mena AF, Brito S, Soteldo C. Mean glandular dose in the mammary gland and dose of radiation in the thyroid gland and lens in women with and without breast implants during different modalities of mammography. RADIOLOGIA 2022; 64 Suppl 1:11-19. [PMID: 35428461 DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
There have always been concerns about the secondary effects of diagnostic methods that use ionizing radiation. During mammography, the parameters to be concerned about are the mean glandular dose and the scatter dose. We evaluated the dose of radiation to the breast, thyroid gland, and lens in digital mammography in women with and without implants, in tomosynthesis in women with and without implants, and in contrast-enhanced mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 212 women with and without disease who were attended at the Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia, CECLINES, in Caracas, Venezuela, between June 2017 and August 2017; the women were classified into five groups according to the mammographic modality used to evaluate them and whether or not they had implants. The statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for the study population. We used the Mann-Whitney U to compare the mean glandular dose and dose in the thyroid gland and lens between groups. RESULTS The mean glandular dose and the dose of radiation received in the thyroid and lens were within the acceptable range. In a few exceptions, the mean glandular dose per view was slightly higher than 3 mGy. The scatter dose to the thyroid gland and the lens during mammography has a very small contribution to the annual dose equivalent. CONCLUSION The mean glandular dose and the scatter dose to the thyroid gland and lens delivered during tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in women with implants were higher than those delivered during other mammographic techniques in women without implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - V S Roldán Sánchez
- Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Edo, Miranda, Venezuela
| | | | - A F Mena
- Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia - CECLINES, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - S Brito
- Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia - CECLINES, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - C Soteldo
- Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Edo, Miranda, Venezuela
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dominique C, Callonnec F, Berghian A, Defta D, Vera P, Modzelewski R, Decazes P. Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4834-4844. [PMID: 35094119 PMCID: PMC8800426 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Methods This retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE) comparable to digital mammography and dual-energy subtracted images (DES) showing tumour angiogenesis. For each lesion, histologic type, tumour grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER-2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and the size of the invasive tumour were retrieved. The deep learning model used was a CheXNet-based model fine-tuned on CESM dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the different models: images by images and then by majority voting combining all the incidences for one tumour. Results In total, 447 invasive breast cancers detected on CESM with pathological evidence, in 389 patients, which represented 2460 images analysed, were included. Concerning the ER, the deep learning model on the DES images had an AUC of 0.83 with the image-by-image analysis and of 0.85 for the majority voting. For the triple-negative analysis, a high AUC was observable for all models, in particularity for the model on LE images with an AUC of 0.90 for the image-by-image analysis and 0.91 for the majority voting. The AUC for the other histoprognostic factors was lower. Conclusion Deep learning analysis on CESM has the potential to determine histoprognostic tumours makers, notably estrogen receptor status, and triple-negative receptor status. Key Points • A deep learning model developed for chest radiography was adapted by fine-tuning to be used on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. • The adapted models allowed to determine for invasive breast cancers the status of estrogen receptors and triple-negative receptors. • Such models applied to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography could provide rapid prognostic and predictive information. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4.
Collapse
|
5
|
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:780-787. [PMID: 31463822 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01423-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and radiomics analysis for the noninvasive differentiation of breast cancer invasiveness, hormone receptor status, and tumor grade. PROCEDURES This retrospective study included 100 patients with 103 breast cancers who underwent pretreatment CEM. Radiomics analysis was performed using MAZDA software. Lesions were manually segmented. Radiomic features were derived from first-order histogram (HIS), co-occurrence matrix (COM), run length matrix (RLM), absolute gradient, autoregressive model, the discrete Haar wavelet transform (WAV), and lesion geometry. Fisher, probability of error and average correlation (POE+ACC), and mutual information (MI) coefficients informed feature selection. Linear discriminant analysis followed by k-nearest neighbor classification (with leave-one-out cross-validation) was used for pairwise texture-based separation of tumor invasiveness and hormone receptor status using histopathology as the standard of reference. RESULTS Radiomics analysis achieved the highest accuracies of 87.4 % for differentiating invasive from noninvasive cancers based on COM+HIS/MI, 78.4 % for differentiating HR positive from HR negative cancers based on COM+HIS/Fisher, 97.2 % for differentiating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive/HR-negative from HER2-negative/HR-positive cancers based on RLM+WAV/MI, 100 % for differentiating triple-negative from triple-positive breast cancers mainly based on COM+WAV+HIS/POE+ACC, and 82.1 % for differentiating triple-negative from HR-positive cancers mainly based on WAV+HIS/Fisher. Accuracies for differentiating grade 1 vs. grades 2 and 3 cancers were 90 % for invasive cancers (based on COM/MI) and 100 % for noninvasive cancers (almost entirely based on COM/MI). CONCLUSIONS Radiomics analysis with CEM has potential for noninvasive differentiation of tumors with different degrees of invasiveness, hormone receptor status, and tumor grade.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pérez Fuentes JA, Roldán Sánchez VS, Gordillo Ledesma AK, Mena AF, Brito S, Soteldo C. Mean glandular dose in the mammary gland and dose of radiation in the thyroid gland and lens in women with and without breast implants during different modalities of mammography. RADIOLOGIA 2021; 64:S0033-8338(21)00017-5. [PMID: 33549317 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There have always been concerns about the secondary effects of diagnostic methods that use ionizing radiation. During mammography, the parameters to be concerned about are the mean glandular dose and the scatter dose. We evaluated the dose of radiation to the breast, thyroid gland, and lens in digital mammography in women with and without implants, in tomosynthesis in women with and without implants, and in contrast-enhanced mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 212 women with and without disease who were attended at the Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia, CECLINES, in Caracas, Venezuela, between June 2017 and August 2017; the women were classified into five groups according to the mammographic modality used to evaluate them and whether or not they had implants. The statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for the study population. We used the Mann-Whitney U to compare the mean glandular dose and dose in the thyroid gland and lens between groups. RESULTS The mean glandular dose and the dose of radiation received in the thyroid and lens were within the acceptable range. In a few exceptions, the mean glandular dose per view was slightly higher than 3mGy. The scatter dose to the thyroid gland and the lens during mammography has a very small contribution to the annual dose equivalent. CONCLUSION The mean glandular dose and the scatter dose to the thyroid gland and lens delivered during tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in women with implants were higher than those delivered during other mammographic techniques in women without implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - V S Roldán Sánchez
- Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Edo, Miranda, Venezuela
| | | | - A F Mena
- Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia - CECLINES, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - S Brito
- Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia - CECLINES, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - C Soteldo
- Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Edo, Miranda, Venezuela
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jain R, Katz DR, Kapoor AD. The Clinical Utility of a Negative Result at Molecular Breast Imaging: Initial Proof of Concept. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2020; 2:e190096. [PMID: 33778735 PMCID: PMC7983715 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020190096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To calculate the negative predictive value (NPV) and false-negative rate (FNR) of molecular breast imaging (MBI) performed in patients who had low-suspicion index findings on mammograms and US images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who had undergone MBI between January 2015 and July 2017, who had index findings on screening mammograms and/or US images, and for whom either histopathologic results or a minimum of 1-year imaging follow-up results were available. A drawn dose of 8 mCi (296 MBq) of technetium 99m sestamibi was administered to all patients for MBI. The NPV and FNR of MBI was calculated for the cohort of 381 findings among 338 women (median age, 56 years; age range, 28-89 years) included in this study. Results Overall, 292 of the 381 (76.6%) MBI results were interpreted as negative. Of the 292, 27 patients underwent subsequent biopsies, results of which were negative for cancer; one patient underwent biopsy, and the result was positive for cancer; and 264 patients had true-negative findings based on follow-up imaging for a minimum of 1 year. Of the 89 MBI acquisitions interpreted as positive, there were 36 cancers. The NPV was calculated to be 99.7% (291 of 292, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.1%, 100%), and the FNR was 2.7% (one of 37, 95% CI: 0%, 7.9%). Interposing MBI reduced the number of biopsies by 67.5%. Conclusion The concept of the clinical utility of a negative MBI result may be valid but requires further testing.Keywords: Breast, Molecular Imaging-Cancer© RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Jain
- From Middlesex Health, 28 Crescent St, Middletown, CT 06457
| | - Deanna R. Katz
- From Middlesex Health, 28 Crescent St, Middletown, CT 06457
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 216:340-348. [PMID: 32755162 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and breast tissue density, menstrual status, endocrine therapy, and risk factors for breast cancer and also to evaluate interreader agreement on classification of BPE on CEM. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five subspecialty-trained breast radiologists independently and blindly graded tissue density (with fatty tissue and scattered fibroglandular tissue classified as nondense tissue and with heterogeneously dense and extremely dense classified as dense tissue) and BPE (with minimal or mild BPE categorized as low BPE and moderate or marked BPE categorized as high BPE) on CEM examinations performed from 2014 to 2018. Electronic medical charts were reviewed for information on menstrual status, endocrine therapy, history of breast surgery, and other risk factors for breast cancer. Comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman rank correlation. Interreader agreement was estimated using the Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS. A total of 202 patients (mean [± SD] age, 54 ± 10 years; range, 25-84 years) underwent CEM. Tissue density was categorized as fatty in two patients (1%), scattered fibroglandular in 67 patients (33%), heterogeneously dense in 117 patients (58%), and extremely dense in 16 patients (8%). Among the 202 patients, BPE was minimal in 77 (38%), mild in 80 (40%), moderate in 31 (15%), and marked in 14 (7%). Dense breasts, younger age, premenopausal status, no history of endocrine therapy, and no history of breast cancer were significantly associated with high BPE. Among premenopausal patients, no association was found between BPE and time from last menstrual period to CEM. Overall interreader agreement on BPE was moderate (κ = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.40-0.42). Interreader agreement on tissue density was substantial (κ = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.69). CONCLUSION. Women with dense breasts, premenopausal status, and younger age are more likely to have greater BPE. Targeting CEM to the last menstrual period is not indicated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Radiomics for Tumor Characterization in Breast Cancer Patients: A Feasibility Study Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10070492. [PMID: 32708512 PMCID: PMC7400681 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10070492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of our intra-individual comparison study was to investigate and compare the potential of radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast for the non-invasive assessment of tumor invasiveness, hormone receptor status, and tumor grade in patients with primary breast cancer. This retrospective study included 48 female patients with 49 biopsy-proven breast cancers who underwent pretreatment breast CEM and MRI. Radiomics analysis was performed by using MaZda software. Radiomics parameters were correlated with tumor histology (invasive vs. non-invasive), hormonal status (HR+ vs. HR-), and grading (low grade G1 + G2 vs. high grade G3). CEM radiomics analysis yielded classification accuracies of up to 92% for invasive vs. non-invasive breast cancers, 95.6% for HR+ vs. HR- breast cancers, and 77.8% for G1 + G2 vs. G3 invasive cancers. MRI radiomics analysis yielded classification accuracies of up to 90% for invasive vs. non-invasive breast cancers, 82.6% for HR+ vs. HR- breast cancers, and 77.8% for G1+G2 vs. G3 cancers. Preliminary results indicate a potential of both radiomics analysis of DCE-MRI and CEM for non-invasive assessment of tumor-invasiveness, hormone receptor status, and tumor grade. CEM may serve as an alternative to MRI if MRI is not available or contraindicated.
Collapse
|
10
|
Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F, Ghaziani MF, Ghafari A, Khezerloo D, Musa AE. A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-00175-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Nowadays, breast cancer is the second cause of death after cardiovascular diseases. In general, about one out of eight women (about 12%) suffer from this disease during their life in the USA and European countries. If breast cancer is detected at an early stage, its survival rate will be very high. Several methods have been introduced to diagnose breast cancer with their clinical advantages and disadvantages.
Main text
In this review, various methods of breast imaging have been introduced. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of each of these methods have been investigated. For each of the imaging methods, articles that were relevant to the past 10 years were selected through electronic search engines, and then the most relevant papers were selected. Finally, about 40 articles were studied and their results were categorized and presented in the form of a report as follows. Various breast cancer imaging techniques were extracted as follows: mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, digital tomosynthesis, sonography, sonoelastography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic elastography, diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic spectroscopy, nuclear medicine, optical imaging, and microwave imaging.
Conclusion
The choice of these methods depends on the patient’s state and stage, the age of the individual and the density of the breast tissue. Hybrid imaging techniques appear to be an acceptable way to improve detection of breast cancer. This review article can be useful in choosing the right method for imaging in people suspected of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharif MI, Li JP, Naz J, Rashid I. A comprehensive review on multi-organs tumor detection based on machine learning. Pattern Recognit Lett 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
12
|
Narayan AK, Elkin EB, Lehman CD, Morris EA. Quantifying performance thresholds for recommending screening mammography: a revealed preference analysis of USPSTF guidelines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 172:463-468. [PMID: 30128821 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4917-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE During ongoing controversies about mammography screening, many investigators have stated that performance improvements in screening mammography may mitigate concerns about harms. However, there have been few attempts to quantify performance improvements required to recommend mammography screening. Based on USPSTF benchmarks, we utilized revealed preference methods to ascertain quantitative thresholds at which screening mammography would be recommended beyond biennial screening in women 50 and older. METHODS Benefits of routine screening mammography (breast cancer deaths averted) were from published USPSTF meta-analyses. Potential harms (10-year cumulative probability of at least one false-positive) were from published Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium estimates. We identified the implicit threshold (benefit/harm ratio) to recommend biennial screening starting at age 50. Using this threshold, we ascertained reductions of false-positives required to recommend more frequent screening and screening initiation under age 50 using revealed preference analyses. RESULTS Using USPSTF implied benefit/harm ratio, routine biennial screening would be recommended starting at 40 if false-positives declined by at least 62%. Reductions of false-positive proportions of 74% would be required to recommend annual screening starting at 40 and reductions of false-positive proportions of 31% would be required to support annual screening starting at 50. CONCLUSIONS Using USPSTF revealed preferences, 31-74% reductions in false-positives would be required to recommend mammography screening beyond biennial screening starting at age 50. Widespread implementation of tomosynthesis and reducing recall rates to the lower end of recommended recall rates (5-12%) would provide support for expanding screening beyond biennial screening in women age 50.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand K Narayan
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St. Wang 219H, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Elena B Elkin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mughal B, Muhammad N, Sharif M, Rehman A, Saba T. Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:778. [PMID: 30068304 PMCID: PMC6090971 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4638-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In digital mammography, finding accurate breast profile segmentation of women's mammogram is considered a challenging task. The existence of the pectoral muscle may mislead the diagnosis of cancer due to its high-level similarity to breast body. In addition, some other challenges due to manifestation of the breast body pectoral muscle in the mammogram data include inaccurate estimation of the density level and assessment of the cancer cell. The discrete differentiation operator has been proven to eliminate the pectoral muscle before the analysis processing. METHODS We propose a novel approach to remove the pectoral muscle in terms of the mediolateral-oblique observation of a mammogram using a discrete differentiation operator. This is used to detect the edges boundaries and to approximate the gradient value of the intensity function. Further refinement is achieved using a convex hull technique. This method is implemented on dataset provided by MIAS and 20 contrast enhanced digital mammographic images. RESULTS To assess the performance of the proposed method, visual inspections by radiologist as well as calculation based on well-known metrics are observed. For calculation of performance metrics, the given pixels in pectoral muscle region of the input scans are calculated as ground truth. CONCLUSIONS Our approach tolerates an extensive variety of the pectoral muscle geometries with minimum risk of bias in breast profile than existing techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bushra Mughal
- Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt, Pakistan
| | - Nazeer Muhammad
- Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Sharif
- Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Rehman
- College of Computer and Information Systems, Al-Yamamah University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tanzila Saba
- Department of Information Systems, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilbert FJ, Selamoglu A. Personalised screening: is this the way forward? Clin Radiol 2018; 73:327-333. [PMID: 29273223 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Screening with mammography has been implemented in many countries across the world with most offering 2-yearly examinations between the ages of 50-69 years. Robust modelling tools that include breast density and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been developed to predict which women are most likely to develop breast cancer. Mammographic sensitivity is poor in women with the densest category of breast tissue, and even women with heterogeneously dense tissue may benefit from additional supplemental imaging. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), contrast-enhanced mammography (CESM) or abbreviated (ABB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) all offer the opportunity to increase cancer detection, especially in women with dense breasts at increased risk of cancer. DBT increases cancer detection by around 15% with a corresponding reduction in recall rates; ABUS has been shown to increase cancer detection by between 2-4/1,000 depending on the cohort being examined and results in increased recalls, which tend to fall in subsequent screening rounds; CESM has very high sensitivity almost matching MRI with slightly improved specificity; ABB-MRI has been shown to be virtually equivalent to standard protocol MRI examinations, making this a technique that could be considered as a screening tool in high-risk women. This article reviews the literature to establish the current status of these techniques. The cost-effectiveness of these techniques requires further investigation and screening trials should report the nature of any additional tumours that are found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 218, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - A Selamoglu
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 218, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jochelson MS, Pinker K, Dershaw DD, Hughes M, Gibbons GF, Rahbar K, Robson ME, Mangino DA, Goldman D, Moskowitz CS, Morris EA, Sung JS. Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2017; 97:37-43. [PMID: 29153365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a new breast imaging technology increasingly used in the diagnostic setting but its utility in the pure screening setting has not been reported. The goal of this pilot study is to prospectively compare screening CEDM to breast MRI in women with an increased risk for breast cancer. METHODS In this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study, 318 women at increased breast cancer risk were consented (December 2012-May 2015) to undergo CEDM in addition to their scheduled MRI. CEDM was performed within 30days of screening MRI. CEDM was interpreted blinded to MRI. The reference standard was defined as a combination of pathology and 2-year imaging follow-up. RESULTS Data from 307/318 patients were evaluable. Three cancers (two invasive cancers, one ductal carcinoma in situ) were detected at first round screening: MRI detected all three and CEDM detected the two invasive cancers. None of the three cancers was seen on the low energy mammograms which are comparable to conventional mammography. At 2year imaging follow up, there were 5 additional screen detected cancers and no palpable cancers. The positive predictive value 3 (PPV3) for CEDM was 15% (2/13, 95% CI: 2-45%) and 14% for MRI (3/21, 95% CI: 3-36%). The specificity of CEDM and MRI were 94.7% and 94.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both CEDM and MRI detected additional cancers not seen on conventional mammography, primarily invasive cancers. Our pilot data suggest that CEDM could be valuable as a supplemental imaging exam for women at increased risk for breast cancer who do not meet the criteria for MRI or for whom access to MRI is limited. Validation in larger multi institutional trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxine S Jochelson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - Katja Pinker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - D David Dershaw
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Mary Hughes
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Girard F Gibbons
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kareem Rahbar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Debra A Mangino
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Debra Goldman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Janice S Sung
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baltzer PAT, Kapetas P, Marino MA, Clauser P. New diagnostic tools for breast cancer. MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY 2017; 10:175-180. [PMID: 28989543 PMCID: PMC5605595 DOI: 10.1007/s12254-017-0341-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of breast cancer. Findings that require further assessment will be detected both at screening and curative mammography. Most findings that are further worked up tend to yield benign diagnoses. Consequently, there is an ongoing search for new tools to reduce recalls and unnecessary biopsies while maintaining or improving cancer detection rates. The clinically most promising methods in this respect are described and discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Kapetas
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ali-Mucheru M, Pockaj B, Patel B, Pizzitola V, Wasif N, Stucky CC, Gray R. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:649-655. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5567-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
18
|
Karunamuni R, Naha PC, Lau KC, Al-Zaki A, Popov AV, Delikatny EJ, Tsourkas A, Cormode DP, Maidment ADA. Development of silica-encapsulated silver nanoparticles as contrast agents intended for dual-energy mammography. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:3301-9. [PMID: 26910906 PMCID: PMC4974128 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4152-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dual-energy (DE) mammography has recently entered the clinic. Previous theoretical and phantom studies demonstrated that silver provides greater contrast than iodine for this technique. Our objective was to characterize and evaluate in vivo a prototype silver contrast agent ultimately intended for DE mammography. METHODS The prototype silver contrast agent was synthesized using a three-step process: synthesis of a silver core, silica encapsulation and PEG coating. The nanoparticles were then injected into mice to determine their accumulation in various organs, blood half-life and dual-energy contrast. All animal procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. RESULTS The final diameter of the nanoparticles was measured to be 102 (±9) nm. The particles were removed from the vascular circulation with a half-life of 15 min, and accumulated in macrophage-rich organs such as the liver, spleen and lymph nodes. Dual-energy subtraction techniques increased the signal difference-to-noise ratio of the particles by as much as a factor of 15.2 compared to the single-energy images. These nanoparticles produced no adverse effects in mice. CONCLUSION Silver nanoparticles are an effective contrast agent for dual-energy x-ray imaging. With further design improvements, silver nanoparticles may prove valuable in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. KEY POINTS • Silver has potential as a contrast agent for DE mammography. • Silica-coated silver nanoparticles are biocompatible and suited for in vivo use. • Silver nanoparticles produce strong contrast in vivo using DE mammography imaging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan Karunamuni
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pratap C Naha
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kristen C Lau
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ajlan Al-Zaki
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anatoliy V Popov
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Edward J Delikatny
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Andrew Tsourkas
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David P Cormode
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Andrew D A Maidment
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Naha PC, Lau KC, Hsu JC, Hajfathalian M, Mian S, Chhour P, Uppuluri L, McDonald ES, Maidment ADA, Cormode DP. Gold silver alloy nanoparticles (GSAN): an imaging probe for breast cancer screening with dual-energy mammography or computed tomography. NANOSCALE 2016; 8:13740-54. [PMID: 27412458 PMCID: PMC4955565 DOI: 10.1039/c6nr02618d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Earlier detection of breast cancer reduces mortality from this disease. As a result, the development of better screening techniques is a topic of intense interest. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography (DEM) is a novel technique that has improved sensitivity for cancer detection. However, the development of contrast agents for this technique is in its infancy. We herein report gold-silver alloy nanoparticles (GSAN) that have potent DEM contrast properties and improved biocompatibility. GSAN formulations containing a range of gold : silver ratios and capped with m-PEG were synthesized and characterized using various analytical methods. DEM and computed tomography (CT) phantom imaging showed that GSAN produced robust contrast that was comparable to silver alone. Cell viability, reactive oxygen species generation and DNA damage results revealed that the formulations with 30% or higher gold content are cytocompatible to Hep G2 and J774A.1 cells. In vivo imaging was performed in mice with and without breast tumors. The results showed that GSAN produce strong DEM and CT contrast and accumulated in tumors. Furthermore, both in vivo imaging and ex vivo analysis indicated the excretion of GSAN via both urine and feces. In summary, GSAN produce strong DEM and CT contrast, and has potential for both blood pool imaging and for breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratap C Naha
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Kristen C Lau
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Jessica C Hsu
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maryam Hajfathalian
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shaameen Mian
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Chhour
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lahari Uppuluri
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Andrew D A Maidment
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - David P Cormode
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA and Department of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sogani J, Morris EA, Kaplan JB, D'Alessio D, Goldman D, Moskowitz CS, Jochelson MS. Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging. Radiology 2016; 282:63-73. [PMID: 27379544 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the extent of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at contrast material-enhanced (CE) spectral mammography and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, to evaluate interreader agreement in BPE assessment, and to examine the relationships between clinical factors and BPE. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Two hundred seventy-eight women from 25 to 76 years of age with increased breast cancer risk who underwent CE spectral mammography and MR imaging for screening or staging from 2010 through 2014 were included. Three readers independently rated BPE on CE spectral mammographic and MR images with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. To assess pairwise agreement between BPE levels on CE spectral mammographic and MR images and among readers, weighted κ coefficients with quadratic weights were calculated. For overall agreement, mean κ values and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The univariate and multivariate associations between BPE and clinical factors were examined by using generalized estimating equations separately for CE spectral mammography and MR imaging. Results Most women had minimal or mild BPE at both CE spectral mammography (68%-76%) and MR imaging (69%-76%). Between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging, the intrareader agreement ranged from moderate to substantial (κ = 0.55-0.67). Overall agreement on BPE levels between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging and among readers was substantial (κ = 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.70). With both modalities, BPE demonstrated significant association with menopausal status, prior breast radiation therapy, hormonal treatment, breast density on CE spectral mammographic images, and amount of fibroglandular tissue on MR images (P < .001 for all). Conclusion There was substantial agreement between readers for BPE detected on CE spectral mammographic and MR images. © RSNA, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Sogani
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Jennifer B Kaplan
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Donna D'Alessio
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Debra Goldman
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S., J.B.K., D.D., M.S.J.), Breast Imaging (E.A.M.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D.G., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yagil Y, Shalmon A, Rundstein A, Servadio Y, Halshtok O, Gotlieb M, Sklair-Levy M. Challenges in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography interpretation: artefacts lexicon. Clin Radiol 2016; 71:450-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
22
|
|
23
|
A Quantification Method for Breast Tissue Thickness and Iodine Concentration Using Photon-Counting Detector. J Digit Imaging 2015; 28:594-603. [PMID: 25708894 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9784-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is to facilitate detection and characterization of the lesions in the breast using intravenous injection of an iodinated contrast agent. CEDM produces iodine images with gray levels proportional to iodine concentration at each pixel, which can be considered as quantification of iodine. While dual-energy CEDM requires an accurate knowledge of the thickness of compressed breast for the quantification, it is known that the accuracy of the built-in thickness measurement is not satisfactory. Triple-energy CEDM, which can provide a third image, can alleviate the limitation of dual-energy CEDM. If triple exposure technique is applied, it can lead to increased risk of motion artifact. An energy-resolving photon-counting detector (PCD) that can acquire multispectral X-ray images can reduce the risk of motion artifact. In this research, an easily implementable method for iodine quantification in breast imaging was suggested, and it was applied to the images of breast phantom with various iodine concentrations. The iodine concentrations in breast phantom simulate lesions filled with different iodine concentrations in the breast. The result shows that the proposed method can quantify the iodine concentrations in breast phantom accurately.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The practice of breast imaging has transitioned through a wide variety of technologic advances from the early days of direct-exposure film mammography to xeromammography to screen-film mammography to the current era of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Along with these technologic advances, organized screening, federal regulations based on the Mammography Quality Standards Act, and the development of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System have helped to shape the specialty of breast imaging. With the development of breast ultrasonography and breast magnetic resonance imaging, both complementary to mammography, additional algorithms for diagnostic workup and screening high-risk subgroups of women have emerged. A substantial part of breast imaging practice these days also involves breast interventional procedures-both percutaneous biopsy to obtain tissue diagnosis and localization procedures to guide surgical excision. This article reviews the evolution of breast imaging starting from a historical perspective and progressing to the present day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie N Joe
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, Room C250, Mail Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94115
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lobbes MBI, Lalji UC, Nelemans PJ, Houben I, Smidt ML, Heuts E, de Vries B, Wildberger JE, Beets-Tan RG. The quality of tumor size assessment by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI. J Cancer 2015; 6:144-50. [PMID: 25561979 PMCID: PMC4280397 DOI: 10.7150/jca.10705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 11/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background - Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a promising new breast imaging modality that is superior to conventional mammography for breast cancer detection. We aimed to evaluate correlation and agreement of tumor size measurements using CESM. As additional analysis, we evaluated whether measurements using an additional breast MRI exam would yield more accurate results. Methods - Between January 1st 2013 and April 1st 2014, 87 consecutive breast cancer cases that underwent CESM were collected and data on maximum tumor size measurements were gathered. In 57 cases, tumor size measurements were also available for breast MRI. Histopathological results of the surgical specimen served as gold standard in all cases. Results - The Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCC) of CESM versus histopathology and breast MRI versus histopathology were all >0.9, p<0.0001. For the agreement between measurements, the mean difference between CESM and histopathology was 0.03 mm. The mean difference between breast MRI and histopathology was 2.12 mm. Using a 2x2 contingency table to assess the frequency distribution of a relevant size discrepancy of >1 cm between the two imaging modalities and histopathological results, we did not observe any advantage of performing an additional breast MRI after CESM in any of the cases. Conclusion - Quality of tumor size measurement using CESM is good and matches the quality of these measurement assessed by breast MRI. Additional measurements using breast MRI did not improve the quality of tumor size measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc B I Lobbes
- 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, ; 5. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich C Lalji
- 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center
| | - Patty J Nelemans
- 2. Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht University
| | - Ivo Houben
- 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center; ; 5. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Heuts
- 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center
| | - Bart de Vries
- 4. Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center
| | - Joachim E Wildberger
- 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, ; 5. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G Beets-Tan
- 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, ; 5. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|