Imaging of the Peripheral Nerves of the Lower Extremity

Neuroma morphology: A macroscopic classification system

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Neuromas come in different shapes and sizes; yet the correlation between neuroma morphology and symptomatology is unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate macroscopic traits of excised human neuromas and assess the validity of a morphological classification system and its potential clinical implications.

METHODS

End-neuroma specimens were collected from prospectively enrolled patients undergoing symptomatic neuroma surgery. Protocolized images of the specimens were obtained intraoperatively. Pain data (Numeric rating scale, 0-10) were prospectively collected during preoperative interview, patient demographic and comorbidity factors were collected from chart review. A morphological classification is proposed, and the inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed. Distribution of neuroma morphology with patient factors, was described.

RESULTS

Forty-five terminal neuroma specimens from 27 patients were included. Residual limb patients comprised 93% of the population, of which 2 were upper (8.0%) and 23 (92.0%) were lower extremity residual limb patients. The proposed morphological classification, consisting of three groups (bulbous, fusiform, atypical), demonstrated a strong IRR (Cohen's kappa = 0.8). Atypical neuromas demonstrated higher preoperative pain, compared with bulbous and fusiform. Atypical morphology was more prevalent in patients with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease.

DISCUSSION

A validated morphological classification of neuroma is introduced. These findings may assist surgeons and researchers with better understanding of symptomatic neuroma development and their clinical implications. The potential relationship of neuroma morphology with the vascular and metabolic microenvironment requires further investigation.

Evaluation of MRI features of neuromas in oncological amputees, and the relation to pain

OBJECTIVE

The impact of time on neuroma growth and morphology on pain intensity is unknown. This study aims to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) differences between symptomatic and non-symptomatic neuromas in oncological amputees, and whether time influences MRI-detected neuroma dimensions and their association with pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Oncological patients who underwent traditional extremity amputation were included. Post-amputation MRIs were assessed before decision for neuroma surgery. Chart review was performed for residual limb pain (numeric rating scale, 0-10) and the presence of neuropathic symptoms. Neuromas were classified as symptomatic or non-symptomatic, with neuroma size expressed as radiological neuroma-to-nerve-ratio (NNR).

RESULTS

Among 78 neuromas in 60 patients, the median NNR was 2.0, and 56 neuromas (71.8%) were symptomatic with a median pain score of 3.5. NNR showed no association with symptomatology or pain intensity but correlated with a longer time-to-neuroma-excision interval and a smaller nerve caliber. Symptomatic neuromas were associated with lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, and the presence of heterotopic ossification. Lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, perineural edema, and presence of heterotopic ossification were associated with more painful neuromas.

CONCLUSION

MRI features associated with symptomatic neuromas and pain intensity were identified. Awareness of the potential clinical significance of these imaging features may help in the interpretation of MRI exams and may aid clinicians in patient selection for neuroma surgery in oncological amputees.

Iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries: imaging features

OBJECTIVE

Describe features of iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries on ultrasound and MRI, which occur when an instrument passes through the bone and injures the nerve after it penetrates the opposite cortex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a keyword search of the radiology database at a tertiary care orthopedic hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, those fulfilling the inclusion criteria of (1) instrumentation through the bone during surgery, (2) acute neuropathy immediately after surgery, (3) nerve injury confirmed on electrodiagnostics, and (4) imaging consistent with overshoot nerve injury were included. Imaging studies were retrospectively evaluated to determine primary and secondary signs of an overshoot nerve injury.

RESULTS

Six patients (3 females, mean age 26.7 (range 10-49) years) had nerve injury fitting the mechanism of injury: 3 injuries to the radial nerve during fixation of distal humerus fractures, 1 tibial nerve and 1 superficial peroneal nerve injury during fixation of tibial fractures, and 1 posterior interosseous nerve injury during biceps tendon repair. Ultrasounds were performed in all while 4 also had MRI. Secondary signs included (1) cortical defect adjacent to injured nerve (n=2); (2) scar extending from bone to injured nerve (n=2); (3) screw tip pointing to injured nerve (n=1, 4) tract in bone on MRI from previous instrumentation pointing to injured nerve (n=2).

CONCLUSION

In addition to primary signs such as laceration or neuroma, secondary signs of "overshoot" nerve injury include cortical defect, scar extending to nerve, screw tip pointing to nerve, and linear tract in the bone on MRI.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus

Pain and weakness in the low back, pelvis, and lower extremities are diagnostically challenging, and imaging can be an important step in the workup and management of these patients. Technical advances in magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) have significantly improved its utility for imaging the lumbosacral plexus (LSP). In this article, the authors review LSP anatomy and selected pathology examples. In addition, the authors will discuss technical considerations for MRN with specific points for the branch nerves off the plexus.

The role of high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of peripheral nerves in the lower extremity

Lower extremity peripheral neuropathy is a commonly encountered neurologic disorder, which can lead to chronic pain, functional disability, and decreased quality of life for a patient. As diagnostic imaging modalities have improved, imaging has started to play an integral role in the detection and characterization of peripheral nerve abnormalities by non-invasively and accurately identifying abnormal nerves as well as potential causes of neuropathy, which ultimately leads to precise and timely treatment. Ultrasound, which has high spatial resolution and can quickly and comfortably characterize peripheral nerves in real time along with associated denervation muscle atrophy, and magnetic resonance neurography, which provides excellent contrast resolution between nerves and other tissues and between pathologic and normal segments of peripheral nerves, in addition to assessing reversible and irreversible muscle denervation changes, are the two mainstay imaging modalities used in peripheral nerve assessment. These two modalities are complimentary, and one may be more useful than the other depending on the nerve and location of pathology. Imaging must be interpreted in the context of available clinical information and other diagnostic studies, such as electrodiagnostic tests. Here, we offer a comprehensive overview of the role of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography in the evaluation of the peripheral nerves of the lower extremity and their associated neuropathies.