Management of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Diffuse lung involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: a respiratory physician's perspective

ABSTRACT

The lungs are one of the most common extra-articular organs involved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which is reported to occur in up to 60% to 80% of RA patients. Respiratory complications are the second leading cause of death due to RA. Although there is a wide spectrum of RA-associated respiratory diseases, interstitial lung disease is the most common manifestation and it impacts the prognosis of RA. There has been progress in understanding the management and progression of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and RA-associated respiratory diseases recently, for example, opportunistic pulmonary infectious diseases and toxicity from RA therapies. From a chest physicians' perspective, we will update the diagnosis and treatment of RA-associated ILD, methotrexate-associated lung disease, and the complication of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in RA in this review.

Interstitial Lung Disease in Connective Tissue Disease: A Common Lesion With Heterogeneous Mechanisms and Treatment Considerations

Connective tissue disease (CTD) related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality of CTD. Clinically, CTD-ILD is highly heterogenous and involves rheumatic immunity and multiple manifestations of respiratory complications affecting the airways, vessels, lung parenchyma, pleura, and respiratory muscles. The major pathological features of CTD are chronic inflammation of blood vessels and connective tissues, which can affect any organ leading to multi-system damage. The human lung is particularly vulnerable to such damage because anatomically it is abundant with collagen and blood vessels. The complex etiology of CTD-ILD includes genetic risks, epigenetic changes, and dysregulated immunity, which interact leading to disease under various ill-defined environmental triggers. CTD-ILD exhibits a broad spectra of clinical manifestations: from asymptomatic to severe dyspnea; from single-organ respiratory system involvement to multi-organ involvement. The disease course is also featured by remissions and relapses. It can range from stability or slow progression over several years to rapid deterioration. It can also present clinically as highly progressive from the initial onset of disease. Currently, the diagnosis of CTD-ILD is primarily based on distinct pathology subtype(s), imaging, as well as related CTD and autoantibodies profiles. Meticulous comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessment to improve the diagnostic process and management strategies are much needed. In this review, we focus on examining the pathogenesis of CTD-ILD with respect to genetics, environmental factors, and immunological factors. We also discuss the current state of knowledge and elaborate on the clinical characteristics of CTD-ILD, distinct pathohistological subtypes, imaging features, and related autoantibodies. Furthermore, we comment on the identification of high-risk patients and address how to stratify patients for precision medicine management approaches.

Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evaluation and Management

Interstitial lung disease is common among patients with connective tissue disease and is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. Infection and drug toxicity must always be excluded as the cause of radiographic findings. Immunosuppression remains a mainstay of therapy despite few controlled trials supporting its use. When a decision regarding therapy initiation is made, considerations include an assessment of disease severity as well as a determination of the rate of progression. Because patients may have extrathoracic disease activity, a multidisciplinary approach is crucial and should include supportive and nonpharmacologic management strategies.

Multidimensional improvement in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: Two courses of pulse dose methylprednisolone followed by low-dose prednisone and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are considered mainstays of therapy for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); however, tacrolimus with corticosteroid therapy has not been fully investigated. Our objectives were to examine the multidimensional therapeutic benefit and tolerability of the combined therapy for the initial treatment of patients with CTD-ILD.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, we identified consecutive CTD-ILD patients treated with tacrolimus plus intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone (1000 mg i.v. 3 days a week for 2 weeks) followed by low-dose prednisolone (10 mg/day). We assessed the multidimensional therapeutic benefit and tolerability including lung physiology, exercise capacity, exercise oxygen desaturation, modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

RESULTS

A total of 26 ILD patients with the underlying CTD diagnoses included 11 with rheumatoid arthritis, 9 with dermatomyositis, 4 with Sjögren's syndrome and 2 others. From baseline to 12 months, the combined therapy significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC; 77.8% to 94.6%, P < 0.001), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL_CO ; 66.1% to 75.1%, P < 0.001), 6-min walk distance (6MWD; 530 to 568 m, P = 0.02), lowest oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry (SpO₂ ; 85% to 89%, P = 0.01), MMRC (1.3 to 0.8, P = 0.01) and SGRQ (38 to 21, P < 0.001). During the study period, only one patient's therapy was discontinued due to an adverse event and none had a life-threatening adverse event attributed to the combined therapy.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of CTD-ILD, two courses of pulse dose methylprednisolone therapy followed by prednisone and oral tacrolimus appeared to be well tolerated, and to have multidimensional efficacy.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: a critical appraisal of the new definition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the newly formulated and published research classification criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and appraise these criteria in light of findings from recent investigations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previous studies demonstrated that interstitial pneumonia may be caused by an autoimmune process with a variety of names and criteria utilized for this entity. To standardize terminology and provide a definition for future research, a multidisciplinary task force formulated criteria by which patients with interstitial lung disease and autoimmune features might be recognized. The interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features criteria require the presence of an interstitial pneumonia on chest imaging or surgical lung biopsy, exclusion of an alternate cause, the absence of a defined connective tissue disease and at least one feature suggestive of autoimmunity from at least two of three domains: clinical with specific extra-thoracic features, serologic with positive autoantibodies and morphologic as demonstrated by chest imaging, histopathology, or multicompartment involvement. Although recent studies provide insight into features of significance, these criteria have not undergone formal validation.

SUMMARY

A uniform name and set of research criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features may identify patients with treatment responsive interstitial lung disease and an improved prognosis. These criteria require validation before they can be applied in the clinical setting.

Utility of autoimmune serology testing in the assessment of uncharacterized interstitial lung disease: a large retrospective cohort review

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune serologies are often obtained in the initial evaluation of uncharacterized interstitial lung disease (ILD). Whether this practice is helpful in delineating connective-tissue disease related ILD (CTD-ILD) is not well known. We assessed the frequency of incident CTD-ILD as detected by autoimmune serology testing and presenting clinical signs and symptoms.

METHODS

Consecutive patients seen at our institution over a four year period with newly diagnosed uncharacterized ILD and autoimmune serologic testing were included. Serologic assessment was performed as a standardized order set of 13 laboratory tests. Presenting demographics and clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of autoimmune disease were correlated with the presence or absence of positive serology studies and final CTD-ILD diagnoses.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of newly diagnosed CTD-ILD was 6.9% (42 of 605). Positive serology was seen in 35.2% (213 of 605) of screened ILD. CTD-ILD was diagnosed in 19.2% of those with positive serology, and 52.8% of those with both positive serology and suggestive clinical signs or symptoms. Only 1.4% of those with positive serology and negative review of systems were diagnosed with CTD-ILD. CTD-ILD diagnoses were made more frequently in younger patients ≤60 years with no diagnoses made after the age of 80 (P = 0.009). Positive serology in non-CTD-ILD cases did not appear to confer any survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

The yield of autoimmune serology testing in uncharacterized ILD appears greatest in those with suggestive clinical signs or symptoms on presentation for CTD-ILD.

Recent advances in connective tissue disease related interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD). Although the majority of patients with CTD-ILD are stable or slowly progressive, a significant group exhibits a more severe and progressive decline. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) describes the subset of patients with interstitial pneumonia who have features suggesting underlying autoimmunity, but whose features fall short of a clear diagnosis of CTD. Areas covered: In this focused review, we discuss recent advances in early detection, prognostic evaluation, and management of autoimmune forms of ILD. Expert commentary: Early detection of ILD and a better understanding of factors that impact prognostication may be helpful when making decisions regarding therapeutic interventions. The treatment of CTD-ILD should be comprehensive, is often fraught with challenges and can be complicated by comorbid conditions and extra-thoracic disease activities. Several large randomized studies have examined the impact of immunosuppressive therapy for CTD-ILD, however, additional studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies. Future studies may provide additional information about the best treatments in patients with IPAF.

Connective tissue disease associated interstitial pneumonia: a challenge for both rheumatologists and pulmonologists

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be either idiopathic, the result of exposure or may be associated with extrapulmonary diseases. Among the latter, connective tissue diseases (CTDs) make up the largest part. The identification, follow-up and treatment of CTD-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) are a challenge for every physician as ILD can occur before, during and after the diagnosis of CTD. Early detection of pulmonary involvement is an essential task for the treating rheumatologist and recognition of the underlying CTD can pose a challenge for the treating pulmonologist. Multidisciplinary engagement towards the patient is therefore indispensable for optimal clinical care. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2017; 34: 326-335).

Therapeutic Approach to Adult Fibrotic Lung Diseases

Among the interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD are associated with a worse prognosis, with death occurring as a result of both respiratory failure and serious associated comorbidities. The recent development and approval of the antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone, both of which reduced the rate of decline in lung function in patients with IPF in clinical trials, offer hope that it may be possible to alter the increased mortality associated with IPF. Although chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and connective tissue disease related-ILD may be associated with an inflammatory component, the evidence for the use of immunosuppressive agents in their treatment is largely limited to retrospective studies. The lack of benefit of immunosuppressive therapy in advanced fibrosis argues for rigorous clinical trials using antifibrotic therapies in these types of ILD as well. Patients with fibrotic ILD may benefit from identification and management of associated comorbid conditions such as pulmonary hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, and OSA, which may improve the quality of life and, in some cases, survival in affected individuals. Because early assessment may optimize posttransplantation outcomes, lung transplant evaluation should occur early in patients with IPF and those with other forms of fibrotic ILD.

Current and emerging treatment options for interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatic disease

The management of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is complex and this arena offers many challenges to the practicing clinician. Unfortunately, treatment strategies and recommendations are often based on experience rather than evidence, and there are few effective therapeutic options. Pharmacologic intervention with immunosuppression is usually the mainstay of therapy and is reserved for those with clinically significant and/or progressive ILD. There is a desperate need for controlled trials across the spectrum of CTD-ILD and a number of potentially promising novel therapies warrant further study. It is important to address co-morbid conditions or aggravating factors (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, aspiration, bone health, pulmonary hypertension, Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis) and to institute non-pharmacologic management strategies (e.g., supplemental oxygen and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation) as part of a comprehensive treatment plan in CTD-ILD.