Health Disparities in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Reporting of determinants of health inequities and participant characteristics in randomized controlled trials of systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To report participant characteristics relevant to identifying health inequities in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) randomized controlled trials conducted in Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (1990 to June 2023), and CENTRAL (inception to June 2023). Eligible studies: used an RCT design; evaluated interventions (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic) among SLE patients aged ≥18 years; and were conducted in Canada. Data extraction was guided by the Campbell and Cochrane Equity Methods Group's PROGRESS-Plus framework on 11 factors leading to health inequities (Place of residence; Race, culture, ethnicity, and language; Occupation; Gender and sex; Religion; Education; Socioeconomic status; Social capital; Plus: Personal characteristics associated with discrimination; Features of relationships; and Time-dependent relationships).

RESULTS

Of 1901 unique records, 6 met the inclusion criteria. Sex and age were the only PROGRESS factors that were reported in all studies. The majority of participants were female (84.4% to 100%), and mean ages of participants ranged from 42 to 52.3 years. Place of residence, race, education, and social capital were reported in three studies. Socioeconomic status was reported in two studies, and occupation was reported in one study. Religion, features of relationships, and time-dependent relationships were not reported in any included studies.

CONCLUSION

Limited reporting of determinants of health inequities in RCTs for SLE in Canada suggests the need for reporting standards to support equity, diversity, and inclusion practices in research.

Recommendations for Improving Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Care From Black Adults: A Qualitative Study

Importance

Racial inequities in incidence, morbidity, and mortality are a defining feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Health care systems are integral to addressing these inequities. However, qualitative evidence that highlights Black SLE care experiences is limited.

Objective

To identify opportunities for improving SLE care based on the experiences and perspectives of Black adults with SLE.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this qualitative study, an interpretive description approach was used and data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Semistructured interviews with Black adults in Michigan who were diagnosed with SLE were conducted. Interviews occurred from November 2, 2021, to July 19, 2022, and data analysis occurred from May 6, 2022, to April 12, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Deidentified transcripts from the interviews were analyzed to develop themes that focused on opportunities to improve quality of care and symptom management.

Results

The participants included 30 Black adults with SLE (97% women; mean age, 41 years; range, 18-65 years). Four main themes were identified: (1) awareness of SLE signs and symptoms before diagnosis (participants emphasized delays in diagnosis and how knowledge concerning SLE could be limited in their families and communities); (2) patient-clinician interactions (participants faced discrimination in health care settings and talked about the value of coordinated and supportive health care teams); (3) medication adherence and health effects (participants experienced a range of adverse effects from medications that treat SLE and described how monitoring medication use and efficacy could inform tailored care approaches); and (4) comprehensive care plans after diagnosis (participants reported persistent pain and other symptoms despite treatment). In the context of disease management, participants emphasized the importance of behavioral change and the negative impact of social risk factors.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this qualitative study suggest how limited information about SLE, experiences of racism, treatment regimens, and social risk factors may affect Black people with SLE. Future research should further engage and include Black communities within the context of treatment and intervention development to reduce racial inequities.

Transmission disequilibrium analysis of whole genome data in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients are unique, with hallmarks of Mendelian disorders (early-onset and severe disease) and thus are an ideal population for genetic investigation of SLE. In this study, we use the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), a family-based genetic association analysis that employs robust methodology, to analyze whole genome sequencing data. We aim to identify novel genetic associations in an ancestrally diverse, international cSLE cohort. Forty-two cSLE patients and 84 unaffected parents from 3 countries underwent whole genome sequencing. First, we performed TDT with single nucleotide variant (SNV)-based (common variants) using PLINK 1.9, and gene-based (rare variants) analyses using Efficient and Parallelizable Association Container Toolbox (EPACTS) and rare variant TDT (rvTDT), which applies multiple gene-based burden tests adapted for TDT, including the burden of rare variants test. Applying the GWAS standard threshold (5.0 × 10-8) to common variants, our SNV-based analysis did not return any genome-wide significant SNVs. The rare variant gene-based TDT analysis identified many novel genes significantly enriched in cSLE patients, including HNRNPUL2, a DNA repair protein, and DNAH11, a ciliary movement protein, among others. Our approach identifies several novel SLE susceptibility genes in an ancestrally diverse childhood-onset lupus cohort.

The Role of Genetic Risk Factors in Pathogenesis of Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The pathogenesis of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is complex and not fully understood. It involves three key factors: genetic risk factors, epigenetic mechanisms, and environmental triggers. Genetic factors play a significant role in the development of the disease, particularly in younger individuals. While cSLE has traditionally been considered a polygenic disease, it is now recognized that in rare cases, a single gene mutation can lead to the disease. Although these cases are uncommon, they provide valuable insights into the disease mechanism, enhance our understanding of pathogenesis and immune tolerance, and facilitate the development of targeted treatment strategies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of both monogenic and polygenic SLE, emphasizing the implications of specific genes in disease pathogenesis. By conducting a thorough analysis of the genetic factors involved in SLE, we can improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disease. Furthermore, this knowledge may contribute to the identification of effective biomarkers and the selection of appropriate therapies for individuals with SLE.

Management and outcomes in children with lupus nephritis in the developing countries

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) has variable prevalence, severity, and outcomes across the world.

OBJECTIVES

This review compares the outcomes of childhood LN in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) and aims to summarize long-term outcomes of pediatric LN from LMICs.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search, conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database in the last 30-years from January 1992, published in the English language, identified 113 studies including 52 from lower (n = 1336) and upper MICs (n = 3014).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cohort studies or randomized controlled trials, of patients ≤ 18 years of age (or where such data can be separately extracted), with > 10 patients with clinically or histologically diagnosed LN and outcomes reported beyond 12 months were included.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients ≤ 18 years of age with clinically or histologically diagnosed LN; effect of an intervention was not measured.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two authors independently extracted data. We separately analyzed studies from developed countries (high income countries; HIC) and developing countries (LMICs). Middle-income countries were further classified as lower and upper MICs. Meta-analyses of data were performed by calculating a pooled estimate utilizing the random-effects model. Test for heterogeneity was applied using I² statistics. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.

RESULTS

Kidney remission was similar across MICs and HICs with 1-year pooled complete remission rates of 59% (95% CI 51-67%); one third of patients had kidney flares. The pooled 5-year survival free of stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD5) was lower in MICs, especially in lower MICs compared to HICs (83% vs. 93%; P = 0.002). The pooled 5-year patient survival was significantly lower in MICs than HICs (85% vs. 94%; P < 0.001). In patients with class IV LN, the 5-and 10-year respective risk of CKD5 was 14% and 30% in MICs; corresponding risks in HICs were 8% and 17%. Long-term data from developing countries was limited. Sepsis (48.8%), kidney failure (14%), lupus activity (18.1%), and intracranial hemorrhage/infarct (5.4%) were chief causes of death; mortality due to complications of kidney failure was more common in lower MICs (25.6%) than HICs (6.4%).

LIMITATIONS

The review is limited by heterogenous approach to diagnosis and management that has changed over the period spanning the review. World Bank classification based on income might not correlate with the standards of medical care. The overall quality of evidence is low since included studies were chiefly retrospective and single center.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Challenges in LMICs include limited access to pediatric nephrology care, dialysis, increased risk of infection-induced mortality, lack of frequent monitoring, and non-compliance due to cost of therapy. Attention to these issues might update the existing data and improve patient follow-up and outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO 2022 number: CRD42022359002, available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022359002.

An ecological approach to understanding and addressing health inequities of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a complex chronic autoimmune disease disproportionally afflicting women and, in particular, American Indian/Alaska Native, Black, and Hispanic women. These groups of women have significantly worse SLE-related health outcomes which are partially attributable to their exposure to marginalizing and interconnecting social issues like racism, sexism, economic inequality, and more. Although these groups of women have higher rates of SLE and though it is well known that they are at risk of exposure to marginalizing social phenomena, relatively little SLE literature explicitly links and addresses the relationship between marginalizing social issues and poor SLE-health outcomes among these women. Therefore, we developed a community-engaged partnership with two childhood-SLE diagnosed women of color to identify their perspectives on which systemic issues impacted on their SLE health-related outcomes. Afterward, we used Cochrane guidelines to conduct a rapid review associated with these identified issues and original SLE research. Then, we adapted an ecological model to illustrate the connection between systems issues and SLE health outcomes. Finally, we provided recommendations for ways to research and clinically mitigate SLE health inequities.

Addressing health disparities as a function of ethnicity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder with significant health disparities, as it disproportionately and more severely affects vulnerable and disadvantaged population groups in the United States and around the world, that is, women, ethnic minorities, individuals living in poverty, less educated, and lacking medical insurance. Both, genetic and non-genetic factors, contribute to these disparities. To overcome these health disparities and reduce poor outcomes among disadvantaged SLE populations, interventions on non-genetic amendable factors, especially on social health determinants, are necessary.

Social Factors, Epigenomics and Lupus in African American Women (SELA) Study: protocol for an observational mechanistic study examining the interplay of multiple individual and social factors on lupus outcomes in a health disparity population

Introduction

Despite the disproportional impact of SLE on historically marginalised communities, the individual and sociocultural factors underlying these health disparities remain elusive. We report the design and methods for a study aimed at identifying epigenetic biomarkers associated with racism and resiliency that affect gene function and thereby influence SLE in a health disparity population.

Methods and analysis

The Social Factors, Epigenomics and Lupus in African American Women (SELA) Study is a cross-sectional, case–control study. A total of 600 self-reported African American women will be invited to participate. All participants will respond to questionnaires that capture detailed sociodemographic and medical history, validated measures of racial discrimination, social support, as well as disease activity and damage for cases. Participants who wish will receive their genetic ancestry estimates and be involved in research. Blood samples are required to provide peripheral blood mononuclear cell counts, DNA and RNA. The primary goals of SELA are to identify variation in DNA methylation (DNAm) associated with self-reported exposure to racial discrimination and social support, to evaluate whether social DNAm sites affect gene expression, to identify the synergistic effects of social factors on DNAm changes on SLE and to develop a social factors-DNAm predictive model for disease outcomes. This study is conducted in cooperation with the Sea Island Families Project Citizen Advisory Committee.

Discussion and dissemination

SELA will respond to the pressing need to clarify the interplay and regulatory mechanism by which various positive and negative social exposures influence SLE. Results will be published and shared with patients and the community. Knowledge of the biological impact of social exposures on SLE, as informed by the results of this study, can be leveraged by advocacy efforts to develop psychosocial interventions that prevent or mitigate risk exposures, and services or interventions that promote positive exposures. Implementation of such interventions is paramount to the closure of the health disparities gap.

Hydralazine attenuates renal inflammation in diabetic rats with ischemia/reperfusion acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the major complications with increased oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic patients. Hyperglycemia stimulates the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). However, hyperglycemia directly triggers the interaction between AGEs and transmembrane AGEs receptors (RAGE), which enhances oxidative stress and increases the production of inflammatory substances. Therefore, diabetes plays a pivotal role in kidney injury. Hydralazine, a vasodilator and antihypertensive drug, was found to have the ability to reduce ROS, oxidative stress, and inflammation. We applied Hydralazine co-culture with AGEs in rat mesangial cells (RMC) and to renal ischemia/reperfusion(I/R) injury models in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Hydralazine significantly decreased AGEs-induced RAGE, iNOS, and COX-2 expressions in RMC. Compared to the diabetic with AKI group, hydralazine decreased inflammation-related protein, and JAK2, STAT3 signaling in rat kidney tissue. Our studies indicate that Hydralazine has the potential to become a beneficial drug in the treatment of diabetic acute kidney injury.

Integrating genetic and social factors to understand health disparities in lupus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both social and genetic factors are associated with health outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), thus playing a role in its health disparities. Despite the growing list of social and genetic factors associated with SLE outcomes, studies integrating sociocultural and individual determinants of health to understand health disparities in SLE are lacking. We review the contributions of different social and genetic factors to the disparities in SLE, and propose a socioecological model to integrate and examine the complex interactions between individual and social factors in SLE outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies collecting comprehensive social data and biospecimens from diverse populations are underway, which will contribute to the elucidation of the interplay and underlying mechanisms by which positive and negative social determinants of health influence epigenomic variation, and how the resulting biological changes may contribute to the lupus health disparities.

SUMMARY

There is growing awareness of the need to integrate genomic and health disparities research to understand how social exposures affect disease outcomes. Understanding the contributions of these factors to the SLE health disparity will inform the development of interventions to eliminate risk exposures and close the health disparity gap.