Biometric approximation of diaphragmatic contractility during sustained hyperpnea

Non-invasive assessment of fatigue and recovery of inspiratory rib cage muscles during endurance test in healthy individuals

INTRODUCTION

Fatigue is defined as loss of capacity to develop muscle force and/or velocity that is reversible at rest. We assessed non-invasively the fatigue and recovery of inspiratory rib cage muscles during two respiratory endurance tests in healthy individuals.

METHODS

The sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) was assessed before and after two respiratory endurance tests: normocapnic hyperpnea (NH) and inspiratory pressure threshold loading (IPTL). Contractile (maximum rate of pressure development and time to peak pressure) and relaxation parameters (maximum relaxation rate [MRR], time constant of pressure decay [τ], and half relaxation time) obtained from sniff curves and shortening velocity and mechanical power estimated using optoelectronic plethysmography were analyzed during SNIP maneuvers. Respiratory muscle activity (electromyography) and tissue oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy-NIRS) were obtained during endurance tests and SNIP maneuvers. Fatigue development of inspiratory rib cage muscles was assessed according to the slope of decay of median frequency.

RESULTS

Peak pressure during SNIP decreased after both protocols (p <0.05). MRR, shortening velocity, and mechanical power decreased (p <0.05), whereas τ increased after IPTL (p <0.05). The median frequency of inspiratory rib cage muscles (i.e., sum of sternocleidomastoid, scalene, and parasternal) decreased linearly during IPTL and exponentially during NH, mainly due to the sternocleidomastoid.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue development behaved differently between protocols and relaxation properties (MRR and τ), shortening velocity, and mechanical power changed only in the IPTL.

Similar Airway Function after Volitional Hyperpnea in Mild-Moderate Asthmatics and Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of exercise training for asthmatics might relate to repetitive airway stretching. Thus, a training with more pronounced airway stretch using isolated, volitional hyperpnea (HYP) might be similarly or more effective. However, in healthy subjects, a bout of HYP training is known to cause an acute FEV1 decline.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was therefore to test whether these changes are more pronounced in asthmatics, possibly putting them at risk with HYP training.

METHODS

Nine subjects with mild-moderate asthma (confirmed by mannitol challenge) and 11 healthy subjects performed six 5-min bouts (with 6-min breaks; HYP1) and one 30-min bout (HYP2) of normocapnic HYP at 60% of maximal voluntary ventilation using warm and humid air. FEV1 and airway resistance (R5) were measured before, in breaks (HYP1), and immediately after HYP, and during 60 min of recovery.

RESULTS

In both groups, a significant and similar decrease in FEV1 during HYP1 (asthmatics: -3 ± 3%; healthy subjects: -2 ± 3%), after HYP1 (asthmatics: -2 ± 5%; healthy subjects: -1 ± 4%), and after HYP2 (asthmatics: -4 ± 5%; healthy subjects: -3 ± 3%), and an increase in R5 during and after both HYPs were observed. Maximal changes in FEV1 and R5 did not correlate with baseline lung function or responsiveness to mannitol.

CONCLUSIONS

A bout of HYP does not lead to relevant bronchoconstriction and the observed changes in lung function and airway resistance are neither of the magnitude of clinical relevance, nor do they differ from responses in healthy individuals. Thus, HYP training can safely be tested as an airway-specific exercise training alternative (or add-on) modality to regular aerobic exercise training.

Temporal characteristics of exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue

There is evidence suggesting diaphragmatic fatigue (DF) occurs relatively early during high-intensity exercise; however, studies investigating the temporal characteristics of exercise-induced DF are limited by incongruent methodology. Eight healthy adult males (25 ± 5 yr) performed a maximal incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer on day 1. A constant-load time-to-exhaustion (TTE) exercise test was conducted on day 2 at 60% delta between the calculated gas exchange threshold and peak work rate. Two additional constant-load exercise tests were performed at the same intensity on days 3 and 4 in a random order to either 50 or 75% TTE. DF was assessed on days 2, 3, and 4 by measuring transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (P_di,tw) in response to cervical magnetic stimulation. DF was present after 75 and 100% TTE (≥20% decrease in P_di,tw). The magnitude of fatigue was 15.5 ± 5.7%, 23.6 ± 6.4%, and 35.0 ± 12.1% at 50, 75, and 100% TTE, respectively. Significant differences were found between 100 to 75 and 50% TTE (both P < 0.01), and 75 to 50% TTE ( P < 0.01). There was a significant relationship between the magnitude of fatigue and cumulative diaphragm force output ( r = 0.785; P < 0.001). Ventilation, the mechanical work of breathing (WOB), and pressure-time products were not different between trials ( P > 0.05). Our data indicate that exercise-induced DF presents a relatively late onset and is proportional to the cumulative WOB; thus the ability of the diaphragm to generate pressure progressively declines throughout exercise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The notion that diaphragmatic fatigue (DF) occurs relatively early during exercise is equivocal. Our results indicate that DF occurs during high-intensity endurance exercise in healthy men and its magnitude is strongly related to the amount of pressure and work generated by respiratory muscles. Thus we conclude that the work of breathing is the major determinant of exercise-induced DF.

Activation of respiratory muscles during respiratory muscle training

It is unknown which respiratory muscles are mainly activated by respiratory muscle training. This study evaluated Inspiratory Pressure Threshold Loading (IPTL), Inspiratory Flow Resistive Loading (IFRL) and Voluntary Isocapnic Hyperpnea (VIH) with regard to electromyographic (EMG) activation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), parasternal muscles (PARA) and the diaphragm (DIA) in randomized order. Surface EMG were analyzed at the end of each training session and normalized using the peak EMG recorded during maximum inspiratory maneuvers (Sniff nasal pressure: SnPna, maximal inspiratory mouth occlusion pressure: PImax). 41 healthy participants were included. Maximal activation was achieved for SCM by SnPna; the PImax activated predominantly PARA and DIA. Activations of SCM and PARA were higher in IPTL and VIH than for IFRL (p<0.05). DIA was higher applying IPTL compared to IFRL or VIH (p<0.05). IPTL, IFRL and VIH differ in activation of inspiratory respiratory muscles. Whereas all methods mainly stimulate accessory respiratory muscles, diaphragm activation was predominant in IPTL.

Diaphragmatic fatigue during inspiratory muscle loading in normoxia and hypoxia

INTRODUCTION

Diaphragmatic fatigue (DF) occurs during strenuous loading of respiratory muscles (e.g., heavy-intensity whole-body exercise, normocapnic hyperpnea, inspiratory resistive breathing). DF develops early on during normoxia, without further decline toward task failure; however, its progression during inspiratory muscle loading in during hypoxia remains unclear. Therefore, the present study used volume-corrected transdiaphragmatic pressures during supramaximal magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (Pdi,twc) to investigate the effect of hypoxia on the progression of diaphragmatic fatigue during inspiratory muscle loading.

METHODS

Seventeen subjects completed two standardized rounds of inspiratory muscle loading (blinded, randomized) under the following conditions: (i) normoxia, and (ii) normobaric hypoxia (SpO2 80%), with Pdi,twc assessment every 45 s.

RESULTS

In fatiguers (i.e., Pdi,twc reduction >10%, n=10), biometric approximation during normoxia is best represented by Pdi,twc=4.06+0.83 exp(-0.19 × x), in contrast to Pdi,twc=4.38-(0.05 × x) during hypoxia.

CONCLUSION

Progression of diaphragmatic fatigue during inspiratory muscle loading assessed by Pdi,tw differs between normoxia and normobaric hypoxia: in the former, Pdi,tw follows an exponential decay, whereas during hypoxia, Pdi,tw follows a linear decline.