Effect of tiotropium on spontaneous expiratory flow-volume curves during exercise in GOLD 1-2 COPD

Tidal volume expandability affected by flow, dynamic hyperinflation, and quasi-fixed inspiratory time in patients with COPD and healthy individuals

Exertional dyspnea (ED) and impaired exercise performance (EP) are mainly caused by dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients by constraining tidal volume expansion at peak exercise (V_Tpeak). As V_Tpeak is the product of inspiratory time (T_Ipeak) and flow (V_T/T_Ipeak), it was hypothesized that V_Tpeak and V_Tpeak/total lung capacity (V_Tpeak/TLC) may be affected by T_Ipeak and V_T/T_Ipeak. Hence, the study investigated the (1) effect of T_Ipeak and V_T/T_Ipeak on V_Tpeak expansion, (2) factors associated with T_Ipeak, expiratory time (T_Epeak), V_T/T_Ipeak, and V_Tpeak/TLC, and (3) relationships between V_T/T_Ipeak and V_Tpeak/TLC with ED and EP in COPD patients and controls. The study enrolled 126 male stable COPD patients and 33 sex-matched controls. At peak exercise, T_Ipeak was similar in all subjects (COPD versus controls, mean ± SD: 0.78 ± 0.17 s versus 0.81 ± 0.20 s, p = NS), whereas the COPD group had lower V_T/T_Ipeak (1.71 ± 0.49 L/s versus 2.58 ± 0.69 L/s, p < .0001) and thus the COPD group had smaller V_Tpeak (1.31 ± 0.34 L versus 2.01 ± 0.45 L,p < .0001) and V_Tpeak/TLC (0.22 ± 0.06 vs 0.33 ± 0.05, p < .0001). T_Ipeak, T_Epeak, and V_T/T_Ipeak were mainly affected by exercise effort, whereas V_Tpeak/TLC was not. T_Epeak, V_T/T_Ipeak, and V_Tpeak/TLC were inversely changed by impaired lung function. T_Ipeak was not affected by lung function. Dynamic hyperinflation did not occur in the controls, however, V_Tpeak/TLC was strongly inversely related to DH (r = −0.79) and moderately to strongly related to lung function, ED, and EP in the COPD group. There was a slightly stronger correlation between V_Tpeak/TLC with ED and EP than V_T/T_Ipeak in the COPD group (|r| = 0.55–0.56 vs 0.38–0.43). In summary, T_Ipeak was similar in both groups and the key to understanding how flow affects lung expansion. However, the DH volume effect was more important than the flow effect on ED and EP in the COPD group.

Dynamic airway function during exercise in COPD assessed via impulse oscillometry before and after inhaled bronchodilators

Assessing airway function during exercise provides useful information regarding mechanical properties of the airways and the extent of ventilatory limitation in COPD. The primary aim of this study was to use impulse oscillometry (IOS) to assess dynamic changes in airway impedance across a range of exercise intensities in patients with GOLD 1-4, before and after albuterol administration. A secondary aim was to assess the reproducibility of IOS measures during exercise. Fifteen patients with COPD (8 males/7 females; age = 66 ± 8 yr; prebronchodilator FEV1 = 54.3 ± 23.6%Pred) performed incremental cycle ergometry before and 90 min after inhaled albuterol. Pulmonary ventilation and gas exchange were measured continuously, and IOS-derived indices of airway impedance were measured every 2 min immediately preceding inspiratory capacity maneuvers. Test-retest reproducibility of exercise IOS was assessed as mean difference between replicate tests in five healthy subjects (3 males/2 females). At rest and during incremental exercise, albuterol significantly increased airway reactance (X5) and decreased airway resistance (R5, R5-R20), impedance (Z5), and end-expiratory lung volume (60% ± 12% vs. 58% ± 12% TLC, main effect P = 0.003). At peak exercise, there were moderate-to-strong associations between IOS variables and IC, and between IOS variables and concavity in the expiratory limb of the spontaneous flow-volume curve. Exercise IOS exhibited moderate reproducibility in healthy subjects which was strongest with R5 (mean diff. = -0.01 ± 0.05 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.68), R5-R20 (mean diff. = -0.004 ± 0.028 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.65), and Z5 (mean diff. = -0.006 ± 0.021 kPa/L/s; ICC = 0.69). In patients with COPD, exercise evoked increases in airway resistance and decreases in reactance that were ameliorated by inhaled bronchodilators. The technique of exercise IOS may aid in the clinical assessment of dynamic airway function during exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study provides a novel, mechanistic insight into dynamic airway function during exercise in COPD, before and after inhaled bronchodilators. The use of impulse oscillometry (IOS) to evaluate airway function is unique among exercise studies. We show strong correlations among IOS variables, dynamic hyperinflation, and shape-changes in the spontaneous expiratory flow-volume curve. This approach may aid in the clinical assessment of airway function during exercise.

Pulmonary function with expiratory resistive loading in healthy volunteers

Expiratory flow limitation is a key characteristic in obstructive pulmonary diseases. To study abnormal lung mechanics isolated from heterogeneities of obstructive disease, we measured pulmonary function in healthy adults with expiratory loading. Thirty-seven volunteers (25±5 yr) completed spirometry and body plethysmography under control and threshold expiratory loading of 7, 11 cmH2O, and a subset at 20 cmH2O (n = 11). We analyzed the shape of the flow-volume relationship with rectangular area ratio (RAR; Ma et al., Respir Med 2010). Airway resistance was increased (p<0.0001) with 7 and 11 cmH2O loading vs control (9.20±1.02 and 11.76±1.68 vs. 2.53± 0.80 cmH2O/L/s). RAR was reduced (p = 0.0319) in loading vs control (0.45±0.07 and 0.47±0.09L vs. 0.48±0.08). FEV1 was reduced (p<0.0001) in loading vs control (3.24±0.81 and 3.23±0.80 vs. 4.04±1.05 L). FVC was reduced (p<0.0001) in loading vs control (4.11±1.01 and 4.14±1.03 vs. 5.03±1.34 L). Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was reduced (p<0.0001) in loading vs control (6.03±1.67 and 6.02±1.84 vs. 8.50±2.81 L/s). FEV1/FVC (p<0.0068) was not clinically significant and FRC (p = 0.4) was not different in loading vs control. Supra-physiologic loading at 20 cmH2O did not result in further limitation. Expiratory loading reduced FEV1, FVC, PEF, but there were no clinically meaningful differences in FEV1/FVC, FRC, or RAR. Imposed expiratory loading likely leads to high airway pressures that resist dynamic airway compression. Thus, a concave expiratory flow-volume relationship was consistently absent-a key limitation for model comparison with pulmonary function in COPD. Threshold loading may be a useful strategy to increase work of breathing or induce dynamic hyperinflation.

The Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common multisystem inflammatory disease with ramifications involving essentially all organ systems. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a comprehensive program designed to prevent and mitigate these disparate systemic effects and improve patient quality of life, functional status, and social functioning. Although initial patient assessment is a prominent component of any pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is not regularly performed as a screening physiologic test prior to PR in COPD patients. Further, CPET is not often used to assess or document the improvement in exercise capacity related to completion of PR. In this review we will describe the classic physiologic abnormalities related to COPD on CPET parameters, the role of CPET in Risk Stratification/Safety prior to PR, the physiologic changes that occur in CPET parameters with PR, and the literature regarding the use of CPET to assess PR results. Finally, we will compare CPET to 6MW in COPD PR, the common minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is associated with CPET, and the potential future roles of CPET in PR and Research.