“Do-not-resuscitate” preferences of the general Swiss population: Results from a national survey

Advance directives in the intensive care unit: An eight-year vanguard cohort study

PURPOSE

To investigate the frequency, content, and clinical translation of advance directives in intensive care units (ICUs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in a Swiss tertiary ICU, including patients with advance directives treated in ICUs ≥48 h. The primary endpoint was the violation of directives. Key secondary endpoints were the directives' prevalence and their translation into clinical practice.

RESULTS

Of 5'851 patients treated ≥48 h in ICUs, 2.7 % had documented directives. Despite 92 % using templates, subjective or contradictory wording was found in 19 % and 12 %. Nine percent of directives were violated. Patients with directive violations had worse in-hospital outcomes (p = 0.012). At admission, 64 % of patients experiencing violations could not communicate, and directives were missing/unrecognized in 30 %. Mostly, directives were not followed regarding life-prolonging measures (6 %), ICU admission (5 %), and mechanical ventilation (3 %). Kaplan Meier statistics revealed a lower survival rate with directives recognized at admission (p = 0.04) and when treatment was withheld (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Advance directives are available in a minority of ICU patients and often contain subjective/contradictory wording. Physicians respected directives in 90 % of patients, with treatment adapted following their wishes. However, violation of directives may have serious consequences with unfavorable in-hospital outcomes and decreased long-term survival with treatment adaption following directives.

Palliative care inpatients in Switzerland (2012-2021): characteristics, in-hospital mortality and avoidable admissions

OBJECTIVES

Palliative patients generally prefer to be cared for and die at home. Overly aggressive treatments place additional strain on already burdened patients and healthcare services, contributing to decreased quality of life and increased healthcare costs. This study characterises palliative inpatients, quantifies in-hospital mortality and potentially avoidable hospitalisations.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective analysis using the national inpatient cohort. The extracted data encompassed all inpatients for palliative care spanning the years 2012-2021. The dataset comprised information on demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, treatments and clinical outcomes. Content experts reviewed a list of treatments for which no hospitalisation was required.

RESULTS

120 396 hospitalisation records indicated palliative patients. Almost half were women (n=59 297, 49%). Most patients were ≥65 years old. 66% had an oncologic primary diagnosis. The majority were admitted from home (82 443; 69%). The patients stayed a median of 12 days (6-20). All treatments for 25 188 patients (21%) could have been performed at home. In-hospital deaths ended 64 739 stays (54%); of note, 10% (n=6357/64 739) of in-hospital deaths occurred within 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study of palliative inpatients, two-thirds were 65 years old and older. Regarding the performed treatments alone, a fifth of these hospitalisations can be considered as avoidable. More than half of the patients died during their hospital stay, and 1 in 10 of those within 24 hours.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment as an essential tool to register or update DNR codes in a tertiary care hospital

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of Do not Resuscitate (DNR) code registration in patients with a geriatric profile admitted to Antwerp University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Flanders, Belgium, and the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on DNR code registration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a population of 543 geriatric patients (mean age 82.4 ± 5.19 years, 46.4% males) admitted to Antwerp University Hospital from 2018 to 2020 who underwent a CGA during admission. An association between DNR code registration status before and at hospital admission and age, gender, ethnicity, type of residence, clinical frailty score (CFS), cognitive and oncological status, hospital ward and stay on intensive care was studied. Admissions before and during the first wave of the pandemic were compared.

RESULTS

At the time of hospital admission, a DNR code had been registered for 66.3% (360/543) of patients. Patients with a DNR code at hospital admission were older (82.7 ± 5.5 vs. 81.7 ± 4.6 years, p = 0.031), more frail (CFS 5.11 ± 1.63 vs. 4.70 ± 1.61, p = 0.006) and less likely to be admitted to intensive care. During the hospital stay, the proportion of patients with a DNR code increased to 77% before and to 85.3% after CGA (p < 0.0001). Patients were consulted about and agreed with the registered DNR code in 55.8% and 52.1% of cases, respectively. The proportion of patients with DNR codes at the time of admission or registered after CGA did not differ significantly before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

After CGA, a significant increase in DNR registration was observed in hospitalized patients with a geriatric profile.

Misconceptions and do-not-resuscitate preferences of healthcare professionals commonly involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitations: A national survey

Aims

To assess the DNR preferences of critical care-, anesthesia- and emergency medicine practitioners, to identify factors influencing decision-making, and to raise awareness for misconceptions concerning CPR outcomes.

Methods

A nationwide multicenter survey was conducted in Switzerland confronting healthcare professionals with a case vignette of an adult patient with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The primary outcome was the rate of DNR Code Status vs. CPR Code Status when taking the perspective from a clinical case vignette of a 70-year-old patient. Secondary outcomes were participants' personal preferences for DNR and estimates of survival with good neurological outcome after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Results

Within 1803 healthcare professionals, DNR code status was preferred in 85% (n = 1532) in the personal perspective of the case vignette and 53.2% (n = 932) when making a decision for themselves. Main predictors for a DNR Code Status regarding the case vignette included preferences for DNR Code Status for themselves (n [%] 896 [58.5] vs. 87 [32.1]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-3.92; p < 0.001) and lower estimated OHCA survival (mean [±SD] 12.3% [±11.8] vs. 14.7%[±12.8]; adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.001). Physicians chose a DNR order more often when compared to nurses and paramedics.

Conclusions

The estimation of outcomes following cardiac arrest and personal living conditions are pivotal factors influencing code status preferences in healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals should be aware of cardiac arrest prognosis and potential implications of personal preferences when engaging in code status- and end-of-life discussions with patients and their relatives.