Increasing hospital volume is not associated with improved survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology

Impact of COVID-19 on resuscitation after hospital arrival for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An interrupted time series analysis

Background

In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods and Results

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we included patients with OHCA who were transported to hospitals between April 2018 and March 2021. Patients were categorized into groups, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the day of admission (before or after April 1, 2020, respectively). The primary outcome was in-hospital CPR duration after hospital arrival, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital death, intubation, and other resuscitation-related treatments. We examined the impact of the pandemic using interrupted time series (ITS) analyses. Among 144,867 patients with OHCA, 82,425 died in the outpatient department (53,286 before the pandemic and 29,139 during the pandemic) during the study period. The ITS analyses for patients who died in the outpatient department showed no significant level change in CPR duration after hospital arrival (0.41 min increase; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.54 to 1.4; p = 0.39), but the intubation rate was significantly lower (-5.9%; 95% CI: -8.4 to 3.4; p < 0.001). In-hospital death among all patients with OHCA showed a significant increase in trend (0.41% per month; 95% CI: 0.081-0.74; p = 0.016).

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic had little impact on CPR duration after hospital arrival; however, there was a marked decrease in intubation for patients with OHCA after hospital arrival.

Association Between Emergency Medical Services Intervention Volume and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival rates are very low. An association between institutional OHCA case volume and patient outcomes has been documented. However, whether this applies to prehospital emergency medicine services (EMS) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between the volume of interventions by mobile intensive care units (MICU) and outcomes of patients experiencing an OHCA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including adult patients with OHCA managed by medical EMS in five French centers between 2013 and 2020. Two groups were defined depending on the overall annual numbers of MICU interventions: low and high-volume MICU. Primary endpoint was 30-day survival. Secondary endpoints were prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), ROSC at hospital admission and favorable neurological outcome. Patients were matched 1:1 using a propensity score. Conditional logistic regression was then used.

RESULTS

2,014 adult patients (69% male, median age 68 [57-79] years) were analyzed, 50.5% (n = 1,017) were managed by low-volume MICU and 49.5% (n = 997) by high-volume MICU. Survival on day 30 was 3.6% in the low-volume group compared to 5.1% in the high-volume group. There was no significant association between MICU volume of intervention and survival on day 30 (OR = 0.92, 95%CI [0.55;1.53]), prehospital ROSC (OR = 1.01[0.78;1.3]), ROSC at hospital admission (OR = 0.92 [0.69;1.21]), or favorable neurologic prognosis on day 30 (OR = 0.92 [0.53;1.62]).

Association between institutional volume of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases and short term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a serious condition. The volume-outcome relationship and various post-cardiac arrest care elements are believed to be associated with improved neurological outcomes. Although previous studies have investigated the volume-outcome relationship, adjusting for post-cardiac arrest care, intra-class correlation for each institution, and other covariates may have been insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the volume-outcome relationships and favorable neurological outcomes among OHCA cases in each institution.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients with non-traumatic OHCA using the OHCA registry in Japan. The primary outcome was 30-day favorable neurological outcomes, and the secondary outcome was 30-day survival. We set the cutoff values to trisect the number of patients as equally as possible and classified institutions into high-, middle-, and low-volume. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were performed to adjust for covariates and within-hospital clustering.

RESULTS

Among the 9909 registry patients, 7857 were included. These patients were transported to either low- (2679), middle- (2657), or high- (2521) volume institutions. The median number of eligible patients per institution in 19 months of study periods was 82 (range, 1-207), 252 (range, 210-353), and 463 (range, 390-701), respectively. After multivariable GEE using the low-volume institution as a reference, no significant difference in odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were noted for 30-day favorable neurological outcomes for middle volume [1.22 (0.69-2.17)] and high volume [0.80 (0.47-1.37)] institutions. Moreover, there was no significant difference for 30-day survival for middle volume [1.02 (0.51-2.02)] and high volume [1.09 (0.53-2.23)] institutions.

CONCLUSION

The patient volume of each institution was not associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Although this result needs to be evaluated more comprehensively, there may be no need to set strict requirements for the type of institution when selecting a destination for OHCA cases.

Effect of annual hospital admissions of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on prognosis following cardiac arrest

Background

Although the prognosis of patients treated at specialized facilities has improved, the relationship between the number of patients treated at hospitals and prognosis is controversial and lacks constancy in those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to clarify the effect of annual hospital admissions on the prognosis of adult patients with OHCA by analyzing a large cohort.

Methods

The effect of annual hospital admissions on patient prognosis was analyzed retrospectively using data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry, a nationwide multihospital prospective database. This study analyzed 3632 of 35,754 patients hospitalized for OHCA of cardiac origin at 86 hospitals. The hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the volume of annual admissions. The effect of hospital volume on prognosis was analyzed using logistic regression analysis with multiple imputation. Furthermore, three subgroup analyses were performed for patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before arrival at the emergency department, patients admitted to critical care medical centers, and patients admitted to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-capable hospitals.

Results

Favorable neurological outcomes 30 days after OHCA for patients overall showed no advantage for medium- and high-volume centers over low-volume centers; Odds ratio (OR) 0.989, (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.562-1.741), OR 1.504 (95% CI 0.919-2.463), respectively. However, the frequency of favorable neurological outcomes in OHCA patients with ROSC before arrival at the emergency department at high-volume centers was higher than those at low-volume centers (OR 1.955, 95% CI 1.033-3.851).

Conclusion

Hospital volume did not significantly affect the prognosis of adult patients with OHCA. However, transport to a high-volume hospital may improve the neurological prognosis in OHCA patients with ROSC before arrival at the emergency department.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00685-7.

Impact of post-arrest care variation on hospital performance after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Large variation exists for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) prehospital care, but less is known about variations in post-arrest care. We sought to evaluate variation in post-arrest care in Texas as well as factors associated with higher performing hospitals.

Methods

We analyzed data in Texas Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (TX-CARES), including all adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from 1/1/2014 through 12/31/ 2020 that survived to hospital admission. We first evaluated variability in provisions of post-arrest care and outcomes. We then stratified hospitals into quartiles based on their rate of survival and evaluated the association between improving quartiles and care. Lastly, we evaluated for outliers in post-arrest care and outcomes using a mixed-effect regression model.

Results

We analyzed 7,842 OHCAs admitted to 146 hospitals. We identified large variations in post-arrest care, including targeted temperature management (TTM) (IQR 7.0-51.1%), left heart catheterization (LHC) (IQ 0-25%), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (IQR 0-10.3%). Higher performing hospital quartiles were associated with higher rates of TTM (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.36-1.49), LHC (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.23), and PCI (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.81-2.25); but lower rates of bystander CPR (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.94). We identified numerous performance outlier hospitals; 39 for TTM, 34 for PCI, 9 for survival to discharge, and 24 for survival with good neurologic function.

Conclusions

Post-arrest care varied widely across Texas hospitals. Hospitals with higher rates of survival to discharge had increased rates of TTM, LHC, and PCI but not bystander CPR.

Association of High-Volume Centers With Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Although high volume of cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a key feature of cardiac arrest centers, which have proven survival benefit, the role of center volume as an independent variable associated with improved outcomes is unclear.

Objective

To assess the association of high-volume centers with survival and neurological outcomes in nontraumatic OHCA.

Data Sources

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to October 11, 2021, for studies including adult patients with nontraumatic OHCA who were treated at high-volume vs non-high-volume centers.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized studies of interventions, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies were selected that met the following criteria: (1) adult patients with OHCA of nontraumatic etiology, (2) comparison of high-volume with low-volume centers, (3) report of a volume-outcome association, and (4) report of outcomes of interest. At least 2 authors independently reviewed each article, blinded to each other's decision.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data abstraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors. Meta-analyses were performed for adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and crude ORs using a random-effects model. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Survival and good neurological outcomes according to the Cerebral Performance Categories Scale at hospital discharge or 30 days.

Results

A total of 16 studies involving 82 769 patients were included. Five studies defined high volume as 40 or more cases of OHCA per year; 3 studies defined high volume as greater than 100 cases of OHCA per year. All other studies differed in definitions. Survival to discharge or 30 days improved with treatment at high-volume centers, regardless of whether aORs (1.28 [95% CI, 1.00-1.64]) or crude ORs (1.43 [95% CI, 1.09-1.87]) were pooled. There was no association between center volume and good neurological outcomes at 30 days or hospital discharge in patients with OHCA (aOR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77-1.20]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis and systematic review, care at high-volume centers was associated with improved survival outcomes, even after adjustment for potential confounders, but was not associated with improved neurological outcomes for patients with nontraumatic OHCA. More studies evaluating the relative importance of center volume compared with other variables (eg, the availability of treatment modalities) associated with survival outcomes in patients with OHCA are required.

Impact of Cardiac Arrest Centers on the Survival of Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The role of cardiac arrest centers (CACs) in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest care systems is continuously evolving. Interpretation of existing literature is limited by heterogeneity in CAC characteristics and types of patients transported to CACs. This study assesses the impact of CACs on survival in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest according to varying definitions of CAC and prespecified subgroups.

Methods and Results

Electronic databases were searched from inception to March 9, 2021 for relevant studies. Centers were considered CACs if self‐declared by study authors and capable of relevant interventions. Main outcomes were survival and neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Meta‐analyses were performed for adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and crude odds ratios. Thirty‐six studies were analyzed. Survival with favorable neurological outcome significantly improved with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.52–2.26]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.18–1.91]) or including improved‐care centers (aOR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.75–2.59]) as CACs. Survival significantly increased with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.59–2.32]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.38–2.18]) or when including improved‐care centers (aOR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.71–2.26]) as CACs. The treatment effect was more pronounced among patients with shockable rhythm (P=0.006) and without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P=0.005). Conclusions were robust to sensitivity analyses, with no publication bias detected.

Conclusions

Care at CACs was associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes for patients with nontraumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest regardless of varying CAC definitions. Patients with shockable rhythms and those without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation benefited more from CACs. Evidence for bypassing hospitals or interhospital transfer remains inconclusive.

Analysis of Characteristics and Mortality in Cardiac Arrest Patients by Hospital Level: a Nationwide Population-based Study

BACKGROUND

Survival and post-cardiac arrest care vary considerably by hospital, region, and country. In the current study, we aimed to analyze mortality in patients who underwent cardiac arrest by hospital level, and to reveal differences in patient characteristics and hospital factors, including post-cardiac arrest care, hospital costs, and adherence to changes in resuscitation guidelines.

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients (≥ 20 years) who suffered non-traumatic cardiac arrest from 2006 to 2015. Patient demographics, insurance type, admission route, comorbidities, treatments, and hospital costs were extracted from the National Health Insurance Service database. We categorized patients into tertiary hospital, general hospital, and hospital groups according to the level of the hospital where they were treated. We analyzed the patients' characteristics, hospital factors, and mortalities among the three groups. We also analyzed post-cardiac arrest care before and after the 2010 guideline changes. The primary end-point was 30 days and 1 year mortality rates.

RESULTS

The tertiary hospital, general hospital, and hospital groups represented 32.6%, 49.6%, and 17.8% of 337,042 patients, respectively. The tertiary and general hospital groups were younger, had a lower proportion of medical aid coverage, and fewer comorbidities, compared to the hospital group. Post-cardiac arrest care, such as percutaneous coronary intervention, targeted temperature management, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, were provided more frequently in the tertiary and general hospital groups. After adjusting for age, sex, insurance type, urbanization level, admission route, comorbidities, defibrillation, resuscitation medications, angiography, and guideline changes, the tertiary and general hospital groups showed lower 1-year mortality (tertiary hospital vs. general hospital vs. hospital, adjusted odds ratios, 0.538 vs. 0.604 vs. 1; P < 0.001). After 2010 guideline changes, a marked decline in atropine use and an increase in post-cardiac arrest care were observed in the tertiary and general hospital groups.

CONCLUSION

The tertiary and general hospital groups showed lower 30 days and 1 year mortality rates than the hospital group, after adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital factors. Higher-level hospitals provided more post-cardiac arrest care, which led to high hospital costs, and showed good adherence to the guideline change after 2010.

Bypassing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients to a regional cardiac center: Impact on hemodynamic parameters and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend systematic care for patients who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and the development of cardiac arrest centers (CACs). However, data regarding prolonged transport time of these often hemodynamically unstable patients are limited.

METHODS

Data from a prospective OHCA registry of a regional CAC collected between 2013 and 2017, when all OHCA patients from the district were required to be transferred directly to the CAC, were analyzed. Patients were divided into two subgroups: CAC, when the CAC was the nearest hospital; and bypass, when OHCA occurred in a region of another local hospital but the subject was transferred directly to the CAC (7 hospitals in the district). Data included transport time, baseline characteristics, hemodynamic and laboratory parameters on admission (systolic blood pressure, lactate, pH, oxygen saturation, body temperature, and initial doses of vasopressors and inotropes), and final outcomes (30-day in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit stay, days on artificial ventilation, and cerebral performance capacity at 1 year).

RESULTS

A total of 258 subjects experienced OHCA in the study period; however, 27 were excluded due to insufficient data and 17 for secondary transfer to CAC. As such, 214 patients were analyzed, 111 in the CAC group and 103 in the bypass group. The median transport time was significantly longer for the bypass group than the CAC group (40.5 min [IQR 28.3-55.0 min] versus 20.0 min [IQR 13.0-34.0], respectively; p˂0.0001). There were no differences in 30-day in-hospital mortality, 1-year neurological outcome, or median length of mechanical ventilation. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, initial hemodynamic parameters on admission, catecholamine dosage(s).

CONCLUSION

Individuals who experienced OHCA and taken to a CAC incurred significantly prolonged transport times; however, hemodynamic parameters and/or outcomes were not affected. These findings shows the safety of bypassing local hospitals for a CAC.

Relationship Between Institutional Volume of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Cases and 1-Month Neurologic Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The influence of institutional volume of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases on outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the relationship between institutional volume of adult, nontraumatic OHCA cases and 1-month favorable neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed data between January 2012 and March 2013 from a prospective observational study in the Kanto area of Japan. We analyzed adult patients with nontraumatic OHCA who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical service personnel and in whom spontaneous circulation was restored. Based on the institutional volume of OHCA cases, we divided institutions into low-, middle-, or high-volume groups. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-month favorable neurologic outcomes and 1-month survival, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for propensity score and in-hospital variables was performed.

RESULTS

Of 2699 eligible patients, 889, 898, and 912 patients were transported to low-volume (40 institutions), middle-volume (14 institutions), and high-volume (9 institutions) centers, respectively. Using low-volume centers as the reference, transport to a middle- or high-volume center was not significantly associated with a favorable 1-month neurologic outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.84-1.75] and adjusted OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.53-1.12], respectively) or 1-month survival (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 0.82-1.47] and adjusted OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.56-1.02], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Institutional volume was not significantly associated with favorable 1-month neurologic outcomes or 1-month survival in OHCA. Further investigation is needed to determine the association between hospital characteristics and outcomes in patients with OHCA.

Decision to deploy coronary reperfusion is not affected by the volume of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients managed by prehospital emergency medical teams

OBJECTIVE

Mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been associated with the volume of activity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities. This observational study investigated whether the coronary reperfusion-decision rate is associated with the volume of activity in a prehospital emergency setting.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data for the period 2003-2013 were extracted from a regional registry of all STEMI patients handled by eight dispatch centers (SAMUs) in and around Paris [41 mobile ICU (MICUs)]. A possible association between volume of activity (number of STEMIs) and coronary reperfusion-decision rate, and subsidiarily between volume of activity and choice of technique (fibrinolysis vs. primary PCI), were investigated. Explanatory factors (patient age, sex, delay between pain onset and first medical contact, and access to a PCI facility) were analyzed in a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 162 patients; male/female 3.5/1; median age 62 (52-72) years were included in the analysis. The median number of STEMIs per MICU was 339 (IQ 220-508) and that of reperfusion-decisions was 94% (91-95). There was no association between the decision rate and the number of STEMIs (P = 0.1). However, the decision rate was associated with age, sex, delay, and access to a PCI facility (P < 0.0001) in a highly significant way. Fibrinolysis was a more frequent option for low-volume (remoter PCI facilities) than high-volume MICUs (30 vs. 16%).

CONCLUSION

The decision of coronary reperfusion in a prehospital emergency setting depended on patient characteristics, delay between pain onset and first medical contact, and access to a PCI facility, but not on volume of activity. Promoting fibrinolysis use in underserved areas might help increase the reperfusion-decision rate.

Outcomes of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to hospital characteristic defined by the annual number of paediatric patients with invasive mechanical ventilation: A nationwide study in Japan

AIM

We examined whether outcomes of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are associated with a hospital characteristic defined by the annual number of invasive mechanical ventilation cases, suggesting hospitals' experience in caring for severely ill paediatric patients.

METHOD

We analysed the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2010 to 2017. We identified children (<18 years) with OHCA and post-resuscitation intensive care (defined as invasive mechanical ventilation and/or catecholamine infusion). Hospitals were divided into four groups by mean annual number of paediatric cases involving invasive mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was unfavourable outcomes (death or medical care dependency at discharge). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between hospitals' experience and outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 2540 paediatric OHCA patients from 385 institutions. Overall in-hospital mortality was 62.4%, with rates of 69.6%, 61.3%, 61.8%, and 57.0% in hospitals with low (≤48 cases/year), low-intermediate (48-110), high-intermediate (110-164), and high (>164) experience levels (P < .001), respectively. Compared to hospitals with low experience, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for hospitals with low-intermediate, high-intermediate, and high experience were as follows: primary outcome: 0.64 (0.40-1.01), 0.67 (0.42-1.05), and 0.46 (0.31-0.70), respectively; secondary outcome: 0.93 (0.55-1.57), 0.95 (0.63-1.43), and 0.67 (0.46-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Japanese hospitals with higher experience in caring for severely ill paediatric patients showed lower mortality for paediatric OHCA. This fact should be considered by the Emergency Medical Systems when deciding transport strategy.

Challenges in the development and implementation of a healthcare system based extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for the treatment of out of hospital cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapies. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there may be challenges in logistics and implementation.

AIMS

The aim of our protocol was to demonstrate that an ECPR team was feasible within our healthcare system and that the identification of UPMC Presbyterian as a receiving center allowed for successful treatment within 30 min from EMS dispatch.

METHODS

We developed out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) ECPR protocols for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), EMS communications, and our in-hospital ECPR team. Inclusion criteria indentified patients with a potentially reversible arrest etiology and high probability of recoverable brain injury using a simple checklist: witnessed collapse, layperson CPR, initial shockable rhythm, and age 18-60 years. We trained local EMS crews to screen patients and reviewed the criteria with a Medic Command Physician prior to transport to our hospital.

RESULTS

From October 2015 to March 31st 2018, EMS treated 1165 EMS OHCA cases, transported 664 (57%) to a local hospital, and transported 120 (10%) to our institution. Of these, five (4.1%) patients underwent ECPR. Among excluded cases, 64 (53%) had nonshockable rhythms, 48 (40%) were unwitnessed arrests, 50 (42%) were over age 60 and the remaining 20 (17%) had no documented reasons for exclusion. For ECPR cases, median pre-hospital CPR duration was 26 [IQR 25-40] min. Four patients (80%) received mechanical CPR. Interval from arrest to arrival on scene was 5 [IQR 4-6] min and interval from radio call to activation of ECPR was 13 [IQR 7-21] min. Interval from EMS dispatch to departure from scene was 20 [IQR 19-21] min. Time from EMS dispatch to initiation of ECPR was 63 [IQR 59-69] min.

CONCLUSIONS

ECPR is an infrequent occurrence in EMS practice. Most apparently eligible patients did not get ECPR, highlighting the need for ongoing programmatic development, provider education, and qualitative work exploring barriers to implementation.

Variation in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between receiving hospitals in Japan: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

Patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies at multilevel (geographical regions, emergency medical service agencies and receiving hospitals) in the USA. However, it remains unclear whether there is a variation in patient outcomes after OHCA between relevant units of the healthcare system such as receiving hospitals in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the variation in patient outcomes after OHCA between receiving hospitals in Japan.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the prospective multicentre OHCA registry.

SETTING

The Japan Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry, a prospective multicentre OHCA registry, including 73 medical institutions in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

9303 adults (≥18 years old) with OHCA of medical origin, treated at 67 hospitals from June 2014 to December 2015.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was 1-month survival after OHCA. The secondary outcome was favourable functional status at 1 month, defined as cerebral performance category scale 1 or 2. We constructed a series of multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models predicting outcomes, accounting for patient-level variables and clustering of patients within hospitals. We evaluated the adjusted 1-month survival and functional outcome for each hospital, ranked hospitals for each outcome and calculated median ORs (MORs) to quantify the between-hospital variation in outcomes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of 1-month survival after OHCA was 7.1% (663/9303) and that of favourable functional outcome was 3.6% (331/9303). After adjustment for patient-level factors, we observed variations in 1-month survival (range, 1.6%-13.8%; adjusted MOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.67) and favourable functional outcome (range, 0.7%-7.3%; adjusted MOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.24) between hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

We found substantial variations in patient outcomes after OHCA within a large group of hospitals in Japan, despite adjustment for patient factors that are known to be associated with different outcomes.

Do Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Have Increased Chances of Survival When Transported to a Cardiac Resuscitation Center?

Background

Patients suffering from an out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest are often transported to the closest hospital. Although it has been suggested that these patients be transported to cardiac resuscitation centers, few jurisdictions have acted on this recommendation. To better evaluate the evidence on this subject, a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the currently available literature evaluating the association between the destination hospital's capability (cardiac resuscitation center or not) and resuscitation outcomes for adult patients suffering from an out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest was performed.

Methods and Results

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were first searched using a specifically designed search strategy. Both original randomized controlled trials and observational studies were considered for inclusion. Cardiac resuscitation centers were defined as having on‐site percutaneous coronary intervention and targeted temperature management capability at all times. The primary outcome measure was survival. Twelve nonrandomized observational studies were retained in this review. A total of 61 240 patients were included in the 10 studies that could be included in the meta‐analysis regarding the survival outcome. Being transported to a cardiac resuscitation center was associated with an increase in survival (odds ratio=1.95 [95% confidence interval 1.47‐2.59], P<0.001).

Conclusions

Adult patients suffering from an out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest transported to cardiac resuscitation centers have better outcomes than their counterparts. When possible, it is reasonable to transport these patients directly to cardiac resuscitation centers (class IIa, level of evidence B, nonrandomized).

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. Unique identifier: CRD42018086608.

Prediction of good neurological recovery after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to train, validate and compare predictive models that use machine learning analysis for good neurological recovery in OHCA patients.

METHODS

Adult OHCA patients who had a presumed cardiac etiology and a sustained return of spontaneous circulation between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed; 80% of the individuals were analyzed for training and 20% were analyzed for validation. We developed using six machine learning algorithms: logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector machine, random forest, elastic net (EN), and neural network. Variables that could be obtained within 24 hours of the emergency department visit were used. The area under the receiver operation curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the discrimination. Calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Reclassification was assessed by using the continuous net reclassification index (NRI).

RESULTS

A total of 19,860 OHCA patients were included in the analysis. Of the 15,888 patients in the training group, 2228 (14.0%) had a good neurological recovery; of the 3972 patients in the validation group, 577 (14.5%) had a good neurological recovery. The LR, XGB, and EN models showed the highest discrimination powers (AUROC (95% CI)) of 0.949 (0.941-0.957) for all), and all three models were well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p >0.05). The XGB model reclassified patients according to their true risk better than the LR model (NRI: 0.110), but the EN model reclassified patients worse than the LR model (NRI: -1.239).

CONCLUSION

The best performing machine learning algorithm was the XGB and LR algorithm.

Relationship between institutional case volume and one-month survival among cases of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

To evaluate volume-outcome relationship in paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the SOS-KANTO 2012 study included data of paediatric OHCA patients <18 years old who were transported to the 53 emergency hospitals in the Kanto region of Japan between January 2012 and March 2013. Based on the paediatric OHCA case volume, the higher one-third of institutions (more than 10 paediatric OHCA cases during the study period) were defined as high-volume centres, the middle one-third institutions (6-10 cases) were defined as middle-volume centres and the lower one-third of institutions (less than 6 cases) were defined as low-volume centres. The primary outcome measurement was survival at 1 month after cardiac arrest. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for 1-month survival and paediatric OHCA case volume were performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores. To estimate the multiple propensity score, we fitted a multinomial logistic regression model, which fell into one of the three groups as patient demographics and prehospital factors.

RESULTS

Among the eligible 282 children, 112, 82 and 88 patients were transported to the low-volume (36 institutions), middle-volume (11 institutions) and high-volume (6 institutions) centres, respectively. Transport to a high-volume centre was significantly associated with a better 1-month survival after adjusting for multiple propensity score (adjusted odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-6.17).

CONCLUSION

There may be a relationship between institutional case volume and survival outcomes in paediatric OHCA.

Patient Characteristics and Emergency Department Factors Associated with Survival After Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Children and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample, 2006-2013

The purpose of the study is to examine (1) nationally representative incidence rates of Emergency Department (ED) visits due to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in pediatric and young adult populations, (2) basic characteristics of the ED visits with SCA, and (3) patient and hospital factors associated with survival after SCA. We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from 2006 to 2013. ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes identified ED visits due to SCA for patients ≤ 30 years old. Outcomes included yearly incidence of ED visits for SCA, and survival to hospital discharge. Predictors of interest were age groups, sex, and SCA case volume. A logistic regression model adjusted by patient- and hospital-level variables was used. Stratified analyses of age by (< 12 and ≥ 12 years old) were performed to explore the effect of pubertal development on SCA. With 71,881 ED visits due to SCA, the total incidence rate was 6.9 per 100,000 population, with a mortality rate of 89.6% and male/female ratio of 1.7. With the adjusted regression models, there were no differences in survival rate by sex; however, when stratified at 12 years old, males were less likely to survive than females above 12 years old (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, P < 0.01), but not under 12 years old. No statistically significant differences in survival rates between low- and high-SCA volume EDs were detected (OR 1.03, P = 0.77). Data showed no benefit of regionalized care for post-SCA in ≤ 30-year-old populations. With further examination of the differences between sexes, new management strategies for SCA cases can be developed.

Long-Term Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care at Regionalized Centers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

It is unknown whether regionalization of postarrest care by interfacility transfer to cardiac arrest receiving centers reduces mortality. We seek to evaluate whether treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center, whether by direct transport or early interfacility transfer, is independently associated with long-term outcome.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including adults resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in southwestern Pennsylvania and neighboring Ohio, West Virginia, and Maryland, which includes approximately 5.7 million residents in urban, suburban, and rural counties. Patients were treated by 1 of 78 ground emergency medical services agencies or 2 air medical transport agencies between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2014. Our primary exposures of interest were interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center within 24 hours of arrest or any treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center regardless of transfer status. Our primary outcome was vital status, assessed through December 31, 2014, with National Death Index records. We used unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses to test the independent association of cardiac arrest receiving center care, whether through direct or interfacility transport, on mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 5,217 cases were observed for 3,629 person-years, with 3,865 total deaths. Most patients (82%) were treated at 42 non-cardiac arrest receiving centers with median annual volume of 17 cases (interquartile range 1 to 53 cases per center annually), whereas 18% were cared for at cardiac arrest receiving centers receiving at least 1 interfacility transfer per month. In adjusted models, treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center was independently associated with reduced hazard of death compared with treatment at a non-cardiac arrest receiving center (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.94). These effects were unchanged when analysis was restricted to patients brought from the scene to the treating hospital. No other hospital characteristic, including total out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient volume and cardiac catheterization capabilities, independently predicted outcome.

CONCLUSION

Both early interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center and direct transport to a cardiac arrest receiving center from the scene are independently associated with reduced mortality.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Systems of Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association previously recommended implementation of cardiac resuscitation systems of care that consist of interconnected community, emergency medical services, and hospital efforts to measure and improve the process of care and outcome for patients with cardiac arrest. In addition, the American Heart Association proposed a national process to develop and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Significant experience has been gained with implementing these systems, and new evidence has accumulated. This update describes recent advances in the science of cardiac resuscitation systems and evidence of their effectiveness, as well as recent progress in dissemination and implementation throughout the United States. Emphasis is placed on evidence published since the original recommendations (ie, including and since 2010).

Variation in outcome of hospitalised patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study

Background

Each year, approximately 30,000 people have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) that is treated by UK ambulance services. Across all cases of OHCA, survival to hospital discharge is less than 10%. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common cause of OHCA.

Objectives

To explore factors that influence survival in patients who initially survive an OHCA attributable to ACS.

Data source

Data collected by the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) between 2003 and 2015.

Participants

Adult patients who had a first OHCA attributable to ACS and who were successfully resuscitated and admitted to hospital.

Main outcome measures

Hospital mortality, neurological outcome at hospital discharge, and time to all-cause mortality.

Methods

We undertook a cohort study using data from the MINAP registry. MINAP is a national audit that collects data on patients admitted to English, Welsh and Northern Irish hospitals with myocardial ischaemia. From the data set, we identified patients who had an OHCA. We used imputation to address data missingness across the data set. We analysed data using multilevel logistic regression to identify modifiable and non-modifiable factors that affect outcome.

Results

Between 2003 and 2015, 1,127,140 patient cases were included in the MINAP data set. Of these, 17,604 OHCA cases met the study inclusion criteria. Overall hospital survival was 71.3%. Across hospitals with at least 60 cases, hospital survival ranged from 34% to 89% (median 71.4%, interquartile range 60.7–76.9%). Modelling, which adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics, could account for only 36.1% of this variability. For the primary outcome, the key modifiable factors associated with reduced mortality were reperfusion treatment [primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or thrombolysis] and admission under a cardiologist. Admission to a high-volume cardiac arrest hospital did not influence survival. Sensitivity analyses showed that reperfusion was associated with reduced mortality among patients with a ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but there was no evidence of a reduction in mortality in patients who did not present with a STEMI.

Limitations

This was an observational study, such that unmeasured confounders may have influenced study findings. Differences in case identification processes at hospitals may contribute to an ascertainment bias.

Conclusions

In OHCA patients who have had a cardiac arrest attributable to ACS, there is evidence of variability in survival between hospitals, which cannot be fully explained by variables captured in the MINAP data set. Our findings provide some support for the current practice of transferring resuscitated patients with a STEMI to a hospital that can deliver pPCI. In contrast, it may be reasonable to transfer patients without a STEMI to the nearest appropriate hospital.

Future work

There is a need for clinical trials to examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of invasive reperfusion strategies in resuscitated OHCA patients of cardiac cause who have not had a STEMI.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Patient, health service factors and variation in mortality following resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in acute coronary syndrome: Analysis of the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project

AIMS

To determine patient and health service factors associated with variation in hospital mortality among resuscitated cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

In this cohort study, we used the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project database to study outcomes in patients hospitalised with resuscitated OHCA due to ACS between 2003 and 2015 in the United Kingdom. We analysed variation in inter-hospital mortality and used hierarchical multivariable regression models to examine the association between patient and health service factors with hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 17604 patients across 239 hospitals. Overall hospital mortality was 28.7%. In 94 hospitals that contributed at least 60 cases, mortality by hospital ranged from 10.7% to 66.3% (median 28.6%, IQR 23.2% to 39.1%)). Patient and health service factors explained 36.1% of this variation. After adjustment for covariates, factors associated with higher hospital mortality included increasing serum glucose, ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis, and initial admission to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) capable hospital. Hospital OHCA volume was not associated with mortality. The key modifiable factor associated with lower mortality was early reperfusion therapy in STEMI patients.

CONCLUSION

There was wide variation in inter-hospital mortality following resuscitated OHCA due to ACS that was only partially explained by patient and health service factors. Hospital OHCA volume and pPCI capability were not associated with lower mortality. Early reperfusion therapy was associated with lower mortality in STEMI patients.

Hospital characteristics and favourable neurological outcome among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka, Japan

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between favourable neurological outcome and hospital characteristics such as hospital volume and number of critical care centres (CCMCs) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

This retrospective, population-based observational study conducted in Osaka Prefecture, Japan included adult patients with OHCA, aged ≥18 years who were transported to acute care hospitals between January 2005 and December 2012. We divided acute care hospitals into CCMCs or non-CCMCs, the latter of which were divided into the following three groups according to the annual average number of transported OHCA cases: low-volume (≤10 cases), middle-volume (11-39 cases), and high-volume (≥40 cases) groups. Random effects logistic regression models, with hospital treated as a random effect, were used to assess factors potentially associated with a favourable neurological outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 44,474 patients were eligible. The proportions of favourable neurological outcome from OHCA were 0.9% (31/3559) in the low-volume group, 1.2% (106/9171) in the middle-volume group, 1.6% (222/14,007) in the high-volume group, and 4.3% (766/17,737) in the CCMC group (P<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, transport to CCMCs was significantly associated with favourable neurological outcome, compared with transport to non-CCMCs (adjusted odds ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-1.66). Among the non-CCMC group, there was no significant relationship between hospital volume and favourable neurological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, transport of OHCA patients to CCMCs led to significantly higher one-month survival rates with favourable neurological outcome from OHCA, whereas no significant association was noted among the hospitals with different volumes.

The impact of hospital experience with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on post cardiac arrest care

OBJECTIVE

Patient volume as a surrogate for institutional experience has been associated with quality of care indicators for a variety of illnesses. We evaluated the association between hospital experience with comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and important care processes.

METHODS

This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using data from 37 hospitals in Southern Ontario from 2007 to 2013. We included adults with atraumatic OHCA who were comatose on emergency department arrival and survived at least 6h. We excluded patients with a Do-Not-Resuscitate order or severe bleeding within 6h of hospital arrival. Multi-level logistic regression models estimated the association between average annual hospital volume of OHCA patients and outcomes. The primary outcome was successful targeted temperature management (TTM) and secondary outcomes included TTM initiation, premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, and survival with good neurologic function.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 2723 patients. For every increase of 10 in the average annual volume of eligible patients, the adjusted odds increased by 30% for successful TTM (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62) and by 38% for initiating TTM (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.72). No significant association between patient volume and other secondary outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients arriving at hospitals with more experience treating comatose post cardiac arrest patients are more likely to have TTM initiated and to successfully reach target temperature. Our findings have implications for regional systems of care and knowledge translation efforts aiming to improve quality of care for this patient population.

Long-term survival benefit from treatment at a specialty center after cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION

The Institute of Medicine and American Heart Association have called for tiered accreditation standards and regionalization of post-cardiac arrest care, but there is little data to support that regionalization has a durable effect on patient outcomes. We tested the effect of treatment at a high-volume center on long-term outcome after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA).

METHODS

We included patients hospitalized at one of 7 medical centers in Southwestern Pennsylvania after SCA from 2005 to 2013. Centers were one regional referral center with an organized systems for post-SCA care, two moderate volume tertiary care centers and 4 low-volume centers. We abstracted clinical characteristics and outcomes at hospital discharge, and for survivors to discharge we queried the National Death Index for long-term survival data. We used Cox regression to determine the unadjusted associations of baseline predictors and survival, and built an adjusted model controlling for baseline predictors.

RESULTS

Overall, 987 patients survived to discharge. During 2196 person-years of follow-up, median survival was 5.3 years and there were 396 deaths. In unadjusted analysis, treating center, age, arrest location, Charlson Comorbidity Index, initial rhythm, cardiac catheterization, defibrillator placement, discharge disposition, and neurological status at discharge were associated with long-term outcome. In adjusted analysis, treatment at the high-volume cardiac arrest center was associated with improved survival compared to treatment at other centers (hazards ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.86).

CONCLUSION

Treatment at a high-volume cardiac arrest center with organized systems for post-arrest care is associated with a substantial long-term survival benefit after hospital discharge.

ECMO Used in a Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation Patient: A National Case-Control Study

Refractory cardiac arrhythmia, which has a poor response to defibrillation and antiarrhythmia medication, is a complicated problem for clinical physicians during resuscitation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be used to sustain life in this situation. ECMO is useful for cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients suffering from cardiac arrest; the use of ECMO in this context is called E-cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, a large-scale and nationwide survey of ECMO usage in cases involving refractory cardiac arrhythmia during resuscitation is lacking. We aimed to clarify the characteristics and efficacy of the application of ECMO in cases involving refractory cardiac arrhythmia during resuscitation by conducting a nationwide study. Using national insurance data from 1996 to 2011, 2702 patients who received defibrillation and amiodarone injections were selected. We excluded trauma patients (n = 316) and those aged<20 years (n = 24). A total of 2362 patients were included, 376 of whom had ECMO support, and 1986 of whom had no ECMO support. After propensity score matching, 320 patients had ECMO support and 640 patients without ECMO support. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of death in ECMO users compared to non-EMCO users. ECMO used in refractory cardiac arrhythmia with high propensity score patients had lower risk of death (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36-0.98). However, prolonged ECMO used >1 day was higher risk of death (OR = 2.88, 95% CI = 1.27-6.53). In our retrospective case control study in refractory cardiac arrhythmia patients, ECMO supportive in high propensity score patients showed improving the overall survival rate but ECMO support for >1 day would be harmful. The evidence derived from this retrospective study using data from the national insurance system is generally of lower methodological evidence than that from randomized controlled trials because a retrospective study is subject to many biases due to lack of the necessary adjustments for possible confounding factors. Therefore, further investigation with a randomized clinical trial is needed to recommend ECMO as a routine in this specific population of patients experiencing cardiac arrest and refractory VT and VF.

Management of cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units: a survey of practice

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest is a common presentation to intensive care units. There is evidence that management protocols between hospitals differ and that this variation is mirrored in patient outcomes between institutions, with standardised treatment protocols improving outcomes within individual units. It has been postulated that regionalisation of services may improve outcomes as has been shown in trauma, burns and stroke patients, however a national protocol has not been a focus for research. The objective of our study was to ascertain current management strategies for comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in intensive care in the United Kingdom.

METHOD

A telephone survey was carried out to establish the management of comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units. All 235 UK intensive care units were contacted and 208 responses (89%) were received.

RESULTS

A treatment protocol is used in 172 units (82.7%). Emergency cardiology services were available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in 54 (26%) hospitals; most units (123, 55.8%) transfer patients out for urgent coronary angiography. A ventilator care bundle is used in 197 units (94.7%) and 189 units (90.9%) have a policy for temperature management. Target temperature, duration and method of temperature control and rate of rewarming differ between units. Access to neurophysiology investigations was poor with 91 units (43.8%) reporting no availability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that treatments available vary considerably between different UK institutions with only 28 units (13.5%) able to offer all aspects of care. This suggests the need for 'cardiac arrest care bundles' and regional centres to ensure cardiac arrests survivors have access to appropriate care.

The Volume-Outcome Relationship in Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the research on volume and outcome relationships in critical care.

METHODS

From January 1, 2001, to April 30, 2014, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing the relationship between admission volume and clinical outcomes in critical illness. Bibliographies were reviewed to identify other articles of interest, and experts were contacted about missing or unpublished studies. Of 127 studies reviewed, 46 met inclusion criteria, covering seven clinical conditions. Two investigators independently reviewed each article using a standardized form to abstract information on key study characteristics and results.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 of the studies (63%) reported a statistically significant association between higher admission volume and improved outcomes. The magnitude of the association (mortality OR between the lowest vs highest stratum of volume centers), as well as the thresholds used to characterize high volume, varied across clinical conditions. Critically ill patients with cardiovascular (n = 7, OR = 1.49 [1.11-2.00]), respiratory (n = 12, OR = 1.20 [1.04-1.38]), severe sepsis (n = 4, OR = 1.17 [1.03-1.33]), hepato-GI (n = 3, OR = 1.30 [1.08-1.78]), neurologic (n = 3, OR = 1.38 [1.22-1.57]), and postoperative admission diagnoses (n = 3, OR = 2.95 [1.05-8.30]) were more likely to benefit from admission to higher-volume centers compared with lower-volume centers. Studies that controlled for ICU or hospital organizational factors were less likely to find a significant volume-outcome relationship than studies that did not control for these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients generally benefit from care in high-volume centers, with more substantial benefits in selected high-risk conditions. This relationship may in part be mediated by specific ICU and hospital organizational factors.

Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

METHODS

In total, 30,525 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were referred to 825 hospitals in Japan from 2010 to 2012. We compared appendectomy-related complications, length of stay (LOS), and medical costs in relation to hospital volume. For this study period, hospitals were categorized as low-volume hospitals (LVHs, <50 cases), medium-volume hospitals (MVHs, 50-100 cases), or high-volume hospitals (HVHs, >100 cases).

RESULTS

Significant differences in appendectomy-related complications were observed among the LVHs, MVHs, and HVHs (6.9, 7.2, and 6.0 %, respectively; p = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression revealed that HVHs were associated with a lower relative risk of appendectomy-related complications than were LVHs and MVHs (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.95; p = 0.006). Multiple linear regression showed that HVHs were associated with shorter LOS and lower medical costs than were LVHs and MVHs. The unstandardized coefficient for LOS was -0.92 days (95 % CI, -1.07 to -0.78; p < 0.001), whereas that for medical costs was - $167.4 (95 % CI, -256.2 to -78.6; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital volume was significantly associated with laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes.

Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death after infected implantable cardioverter-defibrillator removal: A cost-effectiveness evaluation

BACKGROUND

Prevention of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) after removal of an infected implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a challenging clinical dilemma. The cost-effectiveness of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) in this setting remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of the WCD with discharge home, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, or inpatient monitoring for the prevention of SCA after infected ICD removal.

METHODS

A decision model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of use of the WCD to several different strategies for patients who undergo ICD removal. One-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainties.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness of the WCD strategy was $20,300 per life-year (LY) or $26,436 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared to discharge home without a WCD. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility and in-hospital monitoring resulted in higher costs and worse clinical outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was as low as $15,392/QALY if the WCD successfully terminated 95% of SCA events and exceeded the $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold if the efficacy was <69%.The WCD strategy remained cost-effective, assuming 5.6% 2-month SCA risk, as long as the time to reimplantation was at least 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The WCD likely is cost-effective in protecting patients against SCA after infected ICD removal while waiting for ICD reimplantation compared to keeping patients in the hospital or discharging them home or to a skilled nursing facility.

The contributions of emergency physicians to out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: an analysis of the national Utstein Registry data

BACKGROUND

Emergency physicians are likely to play an important role in the "chain of survival." The relationship between the number of emergency physicians and out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) prognosis is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the impact of the number of emergency physicians on the outcomes of OHCA.

METHODS

In a nationwide, population-based, observational study, we enrolled 120,721 adults aged ≥ 18 years with OHCA, from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. We used the countrywide Utstein Registry database coupled with health statistics data surveyed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcomes 1 month after OHCA.

RESULTS

During the study period, OHCA occurred in 25,580 people (21.2%) in an area with the number of emergency physicians/100,000 population < 1.5, in 62,299 people (51.6%) in an area with ≥ 1.5 and < 3.0 emergency physicians/100,000 population, in 30,948 people (25.6%) in an area with ≥ 3.0 and < 4.5 emergency physicians/100,000 population, and in 1894 people (1.6%) in an area with ≥ 4.5 emergency physicians/100,000 population. Patient prognosis became more favorable as the number of emergency physicians increased (1-month survival: 5.08% vs. 5.81% vs. 5.90% vs. 8.82%, p < 0.0001; and favorable neurological outcomes: 2.64% vs. 2.84% vs. 3.23% vs. 3.54%, p < 0.0001; for emergency physicians/100,000 population of < 1.5, ≥ 1.5 and < 3.0, ≥ 3.0 and < 4.5, and ≥ 4.5, respectively). The adjusted odds ratio for favorable neurological outcomes per increase of one emergency physician/100,000 population was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.11, p = 0.0163).

CONCLUSION

An increased number of emergency physicians/100,000 population is likely to be associated with improved outcomes.

Treatment and outcomes of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a regionalized system of care based on presence or absence of initial shockable cardiac arrest rhythm

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a regional system of care. In this retrospective study, the effect of the absence of an initial shockable arrest rhythm was analyzed. The primary end point of survival with good neurologic outcome in patients with and without an initial shockable arrest rhythm was adjusted for age, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and treatment with therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention. One-hundred sixty-eight of 348 patients (49%) survived to hospital discharge. Patients with a shockable initial rhythm were more likely to receive therapeutic hypothermia (48% vs 37%, risk ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 1.5) and to be treated in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (80% vs 43%, risk ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.8). The likelihood of survival with good neurologic outcome in patients with a shockable initial rhythm compared with those presenting without a shockable rhythm was 4.8 (95% CI 2.7 to 8.7). In patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, the likelihood of survival with good neurologic outcome was higher (risk ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.8) in those with a shockable rhythm. In conclusion, the absence of an initial shockable rhythm in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions plus out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with significantly worse survival and neurologic outcome. These differences persist despite application of therapies including therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention within a regionalized system of care.