Ivabradine but not propranolol delays the time to onset of ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation by preserving myocardial metabolic energy status

Preoperative Risk Prediction Score for and In-Hospital Clinical Outcomes of Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation After Release of Aortic Cross-Clamps: A Retrospective Study

Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Predictors of reperfusion VF and its relationships with the adverse prognosis are still unclear. This study aimed to identify a risk score model to predict reperfusion VF and its effect on in-hospital outcomes. The authors enrolled 1,024 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and a total of 823 patients were included in the study. A novel risk score model was developed following logistic regression analysis of the predictors of reperfusion VF. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to validate this model, and the effect of VF on prognosis was later identified in multivariate or Kaplan-Meier analyses. Risk factors for reperfusion VF occurrence included weight >55 kg, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, prior stroke, hypertension, aortic valve replacement, HTK solution, and the use of ≥3 grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting. A novel risk score model was developed using the abovementioned variables, and points were assigned to each risk factor according to its odds ratio. A high score (>6) predicted greater than 65% of patients with VF occurrence. Reperfusion VF increased the risk of in-hospital cardiovascular death (p = 0.03) and renal replacement therapy postoperatively (p = 0.022). More attention should be given to reperfusion VF due to an adverse postoperative prognosis, and the developed risk score model may predict this risk.

Effect of Ivabradine on Cardiac Ventricular Arrhythmias: Friend or Foe?

Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation remain an ongoing clinical problem and their prevention and treatment require optimization. Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs are associated with significant proarrhythmic effects that often outweigh their benefits. Another option, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, though clearly the primary therapy for patients at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias, is costly, invasive, and requires regular monitoring. Thus there is a clear need for new antiarrhythmic treatment strategies. Ivabradine, a heartrate-reducing agent, an inhibitor of HCN channels, may be one of such options. In this review we discuss emerging data from experimental studies that indicate new mechanism of action of this drug and further areas of investigation and potential use of ivabradine as an antiarrhythmic agent. However, clinical evidence is limited, and the jury is still out on effects of ivabradine on cardiac ventricular arrhythmias in the clinical setting.

Effect of ivabradine on cardiac arrhythmias: Antiarrhythmic or proarrhythmic?

Cardiac arrhythmias are a major source of mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, their treatment remains suboptimal. Major classes of antiarrhythmic drugs pose a significant risk of proarrhythmia, and their side effects often outweigh their benefits. Therefore, implantable devices remain the only truly effective antiarrhythmic therapy, and new strategies of antiarrhythmic treatment are required. Ivabradine is a selective heart rate-reducing agent, an inhibitor of hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, currently approved for treatment of coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure. In this review, we focus on the clinical and basic science evidence for the antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of ivabradine. We attempt to dissect the mechanisms behind the effects of ivabradine and indicate the focus of future studies.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in First Acute Myocardial Infarction: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Interventions in Large Animal Models

Ventricular arrhythmia and subsequent sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most frequent causes of death in humans. Lethal ventricular arrhythmias like ventricular fibrillation (VF) prior to hospitalization have been reported to occur in more than 10% of all AMI cases and survival in these patients is poor. Identification of risk factors and mechanisms for VF following AMI as well as implementing new risk stratification models and therapeutic approaches is therefore an important step to reduce mortality in people with high cardiovascular risk. Studying spontaneous VF following AMI in humans is challenging as it often occurs unexpectedly in a low risk subgroup. Large animal models of AMI can help to bridge this knowledge gap and are utilized to investigate occurrence of arrhythmias, involved mechanisms and therapeutic options. Comparable anatomy and physiology allow for this translational approach. Through experimental focus, using state-of-the-art technologies, including refined electrical mapping equipment and novel pharmacological investigations, valuable insights into arrhythmia mechanisms and possible interventions for arrhythmia-induced SCD during the early phase of AMI are now beginning to emerge. This review describes large experimental animal models of AMI with focus on first AMI-associated ventricular arrhythmias. In this context, epidemiology of first AMI, arrhythmogenic mechanisms and various potential therapeutic pharmacological targets will be discussed.

β-Adrenergic stimulation and rapid pacing mutually promote heterogeneous electrical failure and ventricular fibrillation in the globally ischemic heart

Global ischemia, catecholamine surge, and rapid heart rhythm (RHR) due to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VF) are the three major factors of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Loss of excitability culminating in global electrical failure (asystole) is the major adverse outcome of SCA with increasing prevalence worldwide. The roles of catecholamines and RHR in the electrical failure during SCA remain unclear. We hypothesized that both β-adrenergic stimulation (βAS) and RHR accelerate electrical failure in the globally ischemic heart. We performed optical mapping of the action potential (OAP) in the right ventricular (RV) and left (LV) ventricular epicardium of isolated rabbit hearts subjected to 30-min global ischemia. Hearts were paced at a cycle length of either 300 or 200 ms, and either in the presence or in the absence of β-agonist isoproterenol (30 nM). 2,3-Butanedione monoxime (20 mM) was used to reduce motion artifact. We found that RHR and βAS synergistically accelerated the decline of the OAP upstroke velocity and the progressive expansion of inexcitable regions. Under all conditions, inexcitability developed faster in the LV than in the RV. At the same time, both RHR and βAS shortened the time to VF (TVF) during ischemia. Moreover, the time at which 10% of the mapped LV area became inexcitable strongly correlated with TVF (R(2) = 0 .72, P < 0.0001). We conclude that both βAS and RHR are major factors of electrical depression and failure in the globally ischemic heart and may contribute to adverse outcomes of SCA such as asystole and recurrent/persistent VF.

Ivabradine, coronary artery disease, and heart failure: beyond rhythm control

Elevated heart rate could negatively influence cardiovascular risk in the general population. It can induce and promote the atherosclerotic process by means of several mechanisms involving endothelial shear stress and biochemical activities. Furthermore, elevated heart rate can directly increase heart ischemic conditions because of its skill in unbalancing demand/supply of oxygen and decreasing the diastolic period. Thus, many pharmacological treatments have been proposed in order to reduce heart rate and ameliorate the cardiovascular risk profile of individuals, especially those suffering from coronary artery diseases (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF). Ivabradine is the first pure heart rate reductive drug approved and currently used in humans, created in order to selectively reduce sinus node function and to overcome the many side effects of similar pharmacological tools (ie, β-blockers or calcium channel antagonists). The aim of our review is to evaluate the role and the safety of this molecule on CAD and CHF therapeutic strategies.