Location of cardiac arrest and impact of pre-arrest chronic disease and medication use on survival

Survival and neurobehavioral outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in pediatric patients with pre-existing morbidity: An analysis of the THAPCA out-of-hospital arrest data

AIM

Pre-arrest morbidity in adults who suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with increased mortality and poorer neurologic outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine if a similar association is seen in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Out-of-Hospital trial. Study sites included 36 pediatric intensive care units across the United States and Canada. The study enrolled children between the ages of 48 hours and 18 years following an OHCA between September 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012. For our analysis, patients with (N = 151) and without (N = 142) pre-arrest comorbidities were evaluated to assess morbidity, survival, and neurologic function following OHCA.

RESULTS

No significant difference in 28-day survival was seen between groups. Dependence on technology and neurobehavioral outcomes were assessed among survivors using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Second Edition (VABS-II), Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) and Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC). Children with pre-existing comorbidities maintained worse neurobehavioral function at twelve months, evidenced by poorer scores on POPC (p = 0.016), PCPC (p = 0.044), and VABS-II (p = 0.020). They were more likely to have a tracheostomy at hospital discharge (p = 0.034), require supplemental oxygen at three months (p = 0.039) and twelve months (p = 0.034), and be mechanically ventilated at twelve months (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in survival to 28 days following OHCA in children with pre-existing comorbidity compared to previously healthy children. The group with pre-existing comorbidity was more reliant on technology following arrest and exhibited worse neurobehavioral outcomes.

Prognostic predictors in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest: A novel equation for evaluating the 30-day mortality

BACKGROUND

Early prediction of outcomes after cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) is important for considering the best support. Our purpose was to evaluate predictors of the 30-day mortality in patients with CPA after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and to assess an equation for calculating the 30-day mortality using clinical parameters.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 194 consecutive patients with CPA and ROSC in a derivation study (2015-2022). We compared clinical parameters between the survived (n = 78) and dead (n = 116) patients. We derived an equation for estimated probability of death based on clinical parameters, using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The reliability of the equation was validated in 80 additional patients with CPA.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was associated with sex, witnessed cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), CPA due to acute myocardial infarction, pupil diameter, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), presence of light reflex, arterial or venous pH, lactate levels, initial ventricular fibrillation (VF), CPA time, and age. The derived logistic regression equation was as follows: Estimated probability of death = 1 / (1 + e-x), x = (0.25 × bystander CPR) + (0.44 × pupil diameter) - (0.14 × GCS) + (0.09 × lactate) - (1.87 × initial VF) + (0.07 × CPA time) + (0.05 × age) - 7.03. The cut-off value for estimated probability of death calculated by this equation was 54.5 %, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86.2 %, 80.8 %, and 84.5 %, respectively. In the validation model, these values were 81.8 %, 85.7 %, and 82.5 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day mortality may be calculated after ROSC in patients with CPA using simple clinical parameters. This equation may facilitate further best support for patients with CPA.

Impact of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Emergency Medical Staff—Romanian Perspective (IRESUS-EMS)

Background: Unnecessary resuscitation is defined as putting in a disproportionate amount of effort compared to the patients’ prognosis and chance of survival. The primary objective of this study was to determine the number of resuscitations perceived as unnecessary by emergency medical personnel and to correlate it with the characteristics of resuscitation team members, patient particularities and organizational factors related to the professional environment. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study carried out in the emergency department of a university hospital, exploring the perception of the uselessness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) through the completion of a questionnaire. Results: In total, 70.37% of respondents are often involved in CPR attempts in which the efforts made are disproportionate compared to the patients’ expected prognosis, in terms of survival or quality of life. The presence of a non-shockable rhythm increased, by two times, the chances of medical staff finding it unnecessary to initiate CPR. Conclusions: The current study was the first in Romania to investigate the perception of unnecessary CPR, based on the recollection of the last resuscitation performed by the emergency medical staff. The objective criteria related to the patient were the most important predictors for assessing the adequacy of the decision to initiate CPR.

Identifying the relative importance of predictors of survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest: a machine learning study

Introduction

Studies examining the factors linked to survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have either aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of OHCA in different parts of the world, or focused on certain factors and whether they were associated with survival. Unfortunately, this approach does not measure how strong each factor is in predicting survival after OHCA.

Aim

To investigate the relative importance of 16 well-recognized factors in OHCA at the time point of ambulance arrival, and before any interventions or medications were given, by using a machine learning approach that implies building models directly from the data, and arranging those factors in order of importance in predicting survival.

Methods

Using a data-driven approach with a machine learning algorithm, we studied the relative importance of 16 factors assessed during the pre-hospital phase of OHCA. We examined 45,000 cases of OHCA between 2008 and 2016.

Results

Overall, the top five factors to predict survival in order of importance were: initial rhythm, age, early Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, time to CPR and CPR before arrival of EMS), time from EMS dispatch until EMS arrival, and place of cardiac arrest. The largest difference in importance was noted between initial rhythm and the remaining predictors. A number of factors, including time of arrest and sex were of little importance.

Conclusion

Using machine learning, we confirm that the most important predictor of survival in OHCA is initial rhythm, followed by age, time to start of CPR, EMS response time and place of OHCA. Several factors traditionally viewed as important, e.g. sex, were of little importance.

Prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and neurological outcome after adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by location of arrest

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the association between prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and outcome by the location of arrests. This study aimed to investigate the association between prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and one-month survival with favourable neurological outcome.

METHODS

We analysed 276,391 adults aged 18 years and older with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical origin before emergency medical service arrival. Prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was defined as the time from emergency medical service-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation to prehospital return of spontaneous circulation or to hospital arrival. The primary outcome was one-month survival with favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2). The association between prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and favourable neurological outcome was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The proportion of favourable neurological outcomes was 2.3% in total, 7.6% in public locations, 1.5% in residential locations and 0.7% in nursing homes (P < 0.001). In univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, longer prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was associated with poor neurological outcome, regardless of arrest location (P for trend < 0.001). Patients with shockable rhythm in both public and residential locations had better neurological outcome than those in nursing homes at any time point, and residential and public locations had a similar neurological outcome tendency among patients with shockable rhythm.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was independently associated with a lower proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes. Moreover, the association between prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and neurological outcome differed according to the location of arrest and the first documented rhythm.

Comparison of the effects of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on resuscitation outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

This study compared the real-world effects of audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) and video-instructed DA-CPR on resuscitation outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among adult OHCA patients in whom resuscitation was attempted in 2017 in Seoul, Korea. The dispatch center of Seoul introduced video-instructed DA-CPR in 2017, whereas audio-instructed DA-CPR was first implemented in 2010. When more than two bystanders were at the scene and could handle a video-call, the dispatcher call back a video-call and provided CPR instructions. In other situations, standard audio-instructed DA-CPR was provided. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. The secondary outcome was good neurological outcome at hospital discharge. The tertiary outcome was early instruction time interval (ITI, time from call to the initiation of CPR instruction ≤90 s). The study outcomes of audio-instructed DA-CPR (audio group) and video-instructed DA-CPR (video group) were compared. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to increase the comparability of the two groups and the logistic regression was performed for the PSM cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 1720 eligible OHCA patients (1489 and 231 in the audio and video groups, respectively) were evaluated. The median ITI was 136 s in the audio group and 122 s in the video group (p = 0.12). The survival to discharge rates were 8.9% in the audio group and 14.3% in the video groups (p < 0.01). Good neurological outcome occurred in 5.8% and 10.4% in the audio and video groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to the audio group, the AORs (95% CIs) for survival to discharge, good neurological outcome and early ITI of the video group were 1.20 (0.74-1.94), 1.28 (0.73-2.26) and 1.00 (0.70-1.43), respectively. The PSM population showed similar results as those of the original cohort.

CONCLUSION

Compared to audio-instructed DA-CPR, video-instructed DA-CPR was not associated with survival improvement in this observational study conducted in one metropolitan city. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effects of video- and audio-instructed DA-CPR.

Perception of inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation by clinicians working in emergency departments and ambulance services: The REAPPROPRIATE international, multi-centre, cross sectional survey

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often started irrespective of comorbidity or cause of arrest. We aimed to determine the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR of the last cardiac arrest encountered by clinicians working in emergency departments and out-of-hospital, factors associated with perception, and its relation to patient outcome.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 288 centres in 24 countries. Factors associated with perception of CPR and outcome were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and conditional logistic models.

RESULTS

Of the 4018 participating clinicians, 3150 (78.4%) perceived their last CPR attempt as appropriate, 548 (13.6%) were uncertain about its appropriateness and 320 (8.0%) perceived inappropriateness; survival to hospital discharge was 370/2412 (15.3%), 8/481 (1.7%) and 8/294 (2.7%) respectively. After adjusting for country, team and clinician's characteristics, the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR was higher for a non-shockable initial rhythm (OR 3.76 [2.13-6.64]; P < .0001), a non-witnessed arrest (2.68 [1.89-3.79]; P < .0001), in older patients (2.94 [2.18-3.96]; P < .0001, for patients >79 years) and in case of a "poor" first physical impression of the patient (3.45 [2.36-5.05]; P < .0001). In accordance, non-shockable and non-witnessed arrests were both associated with lower survival to hospital discharge (0.33 [0.26-0.41]; P < 0.0001 and 0.25 [0.15-0.41]; P < 0.0001, respectively), as were older patient age (0.25 [0.14-0.44]; P < 0.0001 for patients >79 years) and a "poor" first physical impression (0.26 [0.19-0.35]; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The perception of inappropriate CPR increased when objective indicators of poor prognosis were present and was associated with a low survival to hospital discharge. Factoring clinical judgment into the decision to (not) attempt CPR may reduce harm inflicted by excessive resuscitation attempts.

Improvement in Non-Traumatic, Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in Detroit From 2014 to 2016

Background In 2002, the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest ( OHCA ) survival rate in Detroit was the lowest in the nation. Concerted efforts sought to improve the city's chain of survival with a focus on emergency medical services ( EMS ). This study assesses the impact on OHCA survival rates and describe factors associated with survival. Methods and Results Data for non-traumatic OHCA cases in Detroit from 2014 to 2016 were extracted from CARES (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival). Chi-squared tests, non-parametric tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed to examine the associations between overall survival and its covariates. A total of 2359 non-traumatic OHCA cases were examined. The overall survival rate increased from 3.7% in 2014 to 5.4% in 2015, and 6.4% in 2016 ( P<0.01), reflecting a 73% improvement in survival over the 3-year period. EMS median on-scene time decreased over the study period, while the rate at which EMS initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and applied an automated external defibrillator (AED) greatly increased ( P<0.001). The factors significantly associated with survival were female sex (odds ratio=1.70, P<0.05), a public setting (odds ratio=2.31, P<0.01), an EMS witness (odds ratio=6.18, P<0.01), and the presence of an initial shockable rhythm (odds ratio=1.88, P<0.05). Conclusions From 2014 to 2016, the overall survival rate for OHCA patients in Detroit, MI significantly improved. Our results suggest that an improved chain of survival may explain this progress. This study is an example of how OHCA data analysis and EMS improvement can improve end OHCA outcomes in a resource-limited urban setting.

Neighborhood characteristics, bystander automated external defibrillator use, and patient outcomes in public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) can be used by bystanders to provide rapid defibrillation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Whether neighborhood characteristics are associated with AED use is unknown. Furthermore, the association between AED use and outcomes has not been well characterized for all (i.e. shockable and non-shockable) public OHCAs.

METHODS

We included public, non-911-responder witnessed OHCAs registered in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) between 2013 and 2016. The primary patient outcome was survival to hospital discharge with a favorable functional outcome. We first assessed the association between neighborhood characteristics and bystander AED use using logistic regression and then assessed the association between bystander AED use and patient outcomes in a propensity score matched cohort.

RESULTS

25,182 OHCAs were included. Several neighborhood characteristics, including the proportion of people living alone, the proportion of white people, and the proportion with a high-school degree or higher, were associated with bystander AED use. 5132 OHCAs were included in the propensity score-matched cohort. Bystander AED use was associated with an increased risk of a favorable functional outcome (35% vs. 25%, risk difference: 9.7% [95% confidence interval: 7.2%, 12.2%], risk ratio: 1.38 [95% confidence interval: 1.27, 1.50]). This was driven by increased favorable functional outcomes with AED use in patients with shockable rhythms (58% vs. 39%) but not in patients with non-shockable rhythms (10% vs. 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific neighborhood characteristics were associated with bystander AED use in OHCA. Bystander AED use was associated with an increase in favorable functional outcome.