Pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during nights and weekends

High Variability in the Duration of Chest Compression Interruption is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between chest compression interruption (CCI) patterns and outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

DESIGN

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) data were collected using defibrillator-electrode and bedside monitor waveforms from pediatric ECPR cases between 2013 and 2021. Duration and variability of CCI during cannulation for ECPR was determined and compared with survival to discharge using Fishers exact test and logistic regressions with cluster-robust se s for adjusted analyses.

SETTING

Quaternary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients undergoing ECPR.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 41 ECPR events, median age was 0.7 years (Q1, Q3: 0.1, 5.4), 37% (15/41) survived to hospital discharge with 73% (11/15) of survivors having a favorable neurologic outcome. Median duration of CPR from start of ECPR cannulation procedure to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) flow was 21 minutes (18, 30). Median duration of no-flow times associated with CCI during ECMO cannulation was 11 seconds (5, 28). Following planned adjustment for known confounders, survival to discharge was inversely associated with maximum duration of CCI (odds ratio [OR] 0.91 [0.86-0.95], p = 0.04) as well as the variability in the CCI duration (OR 0.96 [0.93-0.99], p = 0.04). Cases with both above-average CCI duration and higher CCI variability ( sd > 30 s) were associated with lowest survival (12% vs. 54%, p = 0.009). Interaction modeling suggests that lower variability in CCI is associated with improved survival, especially in cases where average CCI durations are higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter duration of CCI and lower variability in CCI during cannulation for ECPR were associated with survival following refractory pediatric cardiac arrest.

Off-Hours versus Regular-Hours Implantation of Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

The "weekend effect" has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our aim was to compare off-hours vs. regular-hours peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in cardiogenic shock patients.

METHODS

We analyzed in-hospital and 90-day mortality among 147 consecutive patients treated with percutaneous VA-ECMO for medical reasons between July 1, 2013, and September 30, 2022, during regular-hours (weekdays 8:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) and off-hours (weekdays 10:01 p.m.-7:59 a.m., weekends, and holidays).

RESULTS

The median patient age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49-64 years) and 112 (72.6%) were men. The median lactate level was 9.6 mmol/L (IQR 6.2-14.8 mmol/L) and 136 patients (92.5%) had a Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stage D or E. Cannulation was performed off-hours in 67 patients (45.6%). In-hospital mortality was similar in off-hours and regular hours (55.2% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.901), as was the 90-day mortality (58.2% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.963), length of hospital stay (31 days [IQR 16-65.8 days] vs. 32 days [IQR 18-63 days], p = 0.979), and VA-ECMO related complications (77.6% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.305).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-hours and regular-hours percutaneous VA-ECMO implantation in cardiogenic shock of medical cause have similar results. Our results support well-designed 24/7 VA-ECMO implantation programs for cardiogenic shock patients.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children: A review of literature, published guidelines and pediatric single-center program building experience

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an adjunct supportive therapy to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) employing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. Its use has seen a significant increase in the past decade, providing hope for good functional recovery to patients with cardiac arrest refractory to conventional resuscitation maneuvers. This review paper aims to summarize key findings from the ECPR literature available to date as well as the recommendations for ECPR set forth by leading national and international resuscitation societies. Additionally, we describe the successful pediatric ECPR program at Texas Children's Hospital, highlighting the logistical, technical and educational features of the program.

On-Hours Compared to Off-Hours Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support Initiation in the United States Between 2009 and 2018-An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

We aimed to investigate whether there are differences in outcome for pediatric patients when extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is initiated on-hours compared with off-hours.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ten-year period (2009-2018) in United States centers, from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.

PATIENTS

Pediatric (>30 d and <18 yr old) patients undergoing venovenous and venoarterial ECLS.

INTERVENTIONS

The primary predictor was on versus off-hours cannulation. On-hours were defined as 0700-1859 from Monday to Friday. Off-hours were defined as 1900-0659 from Monday to Thursday or 1900 Friday to 0659 Monday or any time during a United States national holiday. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were complications related to ECLS and length of hospital stay.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In a cohort of 9,400 patients, 4,331 (46.1%) were cannulated on-hours and 5,069 (53.9%) off-hours. In the off-hours group, 2,220/5,069 patients died (44.0%) versus 1,894/4,331 (44.1%) in the on-hours group (p = 0.93). Hemorrhagic complications were lower in the off-hours group versus the on-hours group (hemorrhagic 18.4% vs 21.0%; p = 0.002). After adjusting for patient complexity and other confounders, there were no differences between the groups in mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.07; p = 0.41) or any complications (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.17; p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival and complication rates are similar for pediatric patients when ECLS is initiated on-hours compared with off-hours. This finding suggests that, in aggregate, the current pediatric ECLS infrastructure in the United States provides adequate capabilities for the initiation of ECLS across all hours of the day.

Initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock during out of hours versus working hours is not associated with increased mortality

BACKGROUND

Initiation of veno-arterial (VA) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator (ECMO) is associated with severe complications. It is unknown whether these adverse consequences occur more often after initiations during out of hours service compared to working hours.

METHODS

All patients receiving VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock between 2009 and 2020 were categorized into a working hours group (between 8 am and 5 pm on weekdays) and an out of hours service group (between 5 pm and 8 am, or between Friday 5 pm and Monday 8 am). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included vascular complications (including limb ischemia and/or bleeding), bloodstream infections and length of ICU stay. Propensity scores were used to adjust for potential confounding effects.

RESULTS

Among 250 patients (median (IQR) age 56 (42-64) years) receiving VA-ECMO (median duration 3.5 (1.0-9.0) days), 160 (64%) runs were initiated between 5 pm and 8 am whereas the remainder (36%) started during working hours. Characteristic did not differ between the working hours- and out of hours-group. By day 30, 37 (41.1%), and 68 (42.5%) patients in either group had died, respectively (p = 0.831). VA-ECMO support duration and length of stay on the ICU did not differ significantly in both crude and adjusted analyses. More complications occurred during out of hours service (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Out of hours- versus working hours-initiation of VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock was not associated with higher mortality, longer VA-ECMO support duration, or longer length of stay on the intensive care. Vascular complications were more common in the out of hours group.

Paediatric In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and outcomes in children with CHD during nights and weekends

BACKGROUND

Survival after paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest is worse on nights and weekends without demonstration of disparity in cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality. It is unknown whether these findings differ in children with CHD. This study aimed to determine whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality might explain the hypothesised worse outcomes of children with CHD during nights and weekends.

METHODS

In-hospital cardiac arrest data collected by the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative for children with CHD. Chest compression quality metrics and survival outcomes were compared between events that occurred during day versus night, and during weekday versus weekend using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We evaluated 3614 sixty-second epochs of chest compression data from 132 subjects between 2015 and 2020. There was no difference in chest compression quality metrics during day versus night or weekday versus weekend. Weekday versus weekend was associated with improved survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio 4.56 [1.29,16.11]; p = 0.02] and survival to hospital discharge with favourable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 6.35 [1.36,29.6]; p = 0.02), but no difference with rate of return of spontaneous circulation or return of circulation. There was no difference in outcomes for day versus night.

CONCLUSION

For children with CHD and in-hospital cardiac arrest, there was no difference in chest compression quality metrics by time of day or day of week. Although there was no difference in outcomes for events during days versus nights, there was improved survival to hospital discharge and survival to hospital discharge with favourable neurological outcome for events occurring on weekdays compared to weekends.

Outcomes in Pediatric Post-Cardiotomy ECMO Support With Modification of Systematic Support Strategy

BACKGROUND

Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in the post-cardiotomy setting is vital to successful perioperative outcomes following pediatric cardiac surgery. Specific analysis of protocolized management strategies and staff preparedness is imperative to optimizing institutional ECMO outcomes.

METHODS

All patients requiring post-cardiotomy ECMO support at a single institution from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. In 2015, several modifications were made to the ECMO support paradigm that addressed deficiencies in equipment, critical care protocols, and staff preparedness. Cases were stratified according to era of ECMO support; patients supported prior to paradigm change from 2013 to 2015 (Group EARLY, n = 20), and patients supported following the implementation of systematic modifications from 2016 to 2019 (Group LATE, n = 26). The primary outcomes of interest were survival to decannulation and hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Median age at cannulation was 24.5 days (IQR 7-96) and median duration of support was 4 days (IQR 2-8). Overall survival to decannulation was 78.3% (65% EARLY vs. 88.5% LATE, P = .08) and overall survival to hospital discharge was 58.7% (35% EARLY vs. 76.9% LATE, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Systematic modifications to ECMO support strategy and staff preparation are associated with a significant increase in perioperative survival for pediatric patients requiring post-cardiotomy ECMO support.

Survival outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in pediatric patients in the USA

We report on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the USA. The data were obtained from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample datasets for the years 2000-2017, which includes data from participating hospitals in 47 US states and the District of Columbia. We included pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with cardiac arrest, and we excluded patients with no cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the hospitalization. Primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality after cardiac arrest. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with survival. A total of 20,654 patients were identified, and 8226 (39.82%) patients survived to discharge. The median length of stay and cost of hospitalization were significantly higher in the survivors vs. non-survivors (LOS 18 days vs. 1 day, and cost $187,434 vs. $45,811, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, patients admitted to teaching hospitals, elective admissions, and those admitted on weekdays had higher survival (aOR=1.19, CI: 1.06-1.33; aOR=2.65, CI: 2.37-2.97; and aOR=1.17, CI: 1.07-1.27, respectively). There was no difference in mortality between patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) and those with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. E-CPR patients were likely to have congenital heart surgery (51.0% vs. 20.8%).Conclusion: We highlighted the survival predictors in these events, which can guide future studies aimed at improving outcomes in pediatric cardiac arrest. What is Known: • In-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in 2-6% of pediatric intensive care admissions. • Cardiac arrests had a significant impact on hospital resources and a significantly high mortality rate. What is New: • Factors associated with higher survival rates in patients with cardiac arrest: admission to teaching hospitals, elective admissions, and week-day admissions. • The use of rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest has increased by threefold over the last two decades.

Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health issue. It is a serious condition; most probably end up with death within a few minutes even with corrective measures. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is expected to increase the probability of survival and prevent neurological disabilities in patients with cardiac arrest. Having a pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is vital to develop strategies targeted to increase probability of survival among patients with cardiac arrest. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge among pediatric patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane review databases were searched. To have current (five-year) evidence, only studies published in 2016 to 2020 were included. The weighted inverse variance random-effects model at 95%CI was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of survival. Heterogeneity assessment, test of publication bias, and subgroup analyses were also employed accordingly.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles with a total sample size of 28,479 children were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge was found to be 46% (95% CI = 43.0-50.0%; I2 = 96.7%; p < 0.001). Based on subgroup analysis by "continent" and "income level", lowest prevalence of pooled survival was observed in Asia (six studies; pooled survival =36.0% with 95% CI = 19.01-52.15%; I2 = 97.4%; p < 0.001) and in low and middle income countries (six studies, pooled survival = 34.0% with 95% CI = 17.0-51.0%, I2 = 97.67%, p < 0.001) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although there was an extremely high heterogeneity among reported results (I2 = 96.7%), in this meta-analysis more than half of pediatric patients (54%) who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest did not survived to hospital discharge. Therefore, developing further strategies and encouraging researches might be crucial.

Outcomes of Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work is to provide insight into survival and neurologic outcomes of pediatric patients supported with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed from January 1990 to May 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

A comprehensive list of nonregistry studies with pediatric patients managed with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study characteristics and outcome estimates were extracted from each article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Differences were estimated using subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. The Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline was followed and the certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Twenty-eight studies (1,348 patients) were included. There was a steady increase in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurrence rate from the 1990s until 2020. There were 32, 338, and 1,094 patients' articles published between 1990 and 2000, 2001 and 2010, and 2010 and 2020, respectively. More than 70% were cannulated for a primary cardiac arrest. Pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients had a 46% (CI 95% = 43-48%; p < 0.01) overall survival rate. The rate of survival with favorable neurologic outcome was 30% (CI 95% = 27-33%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is rapidly expanding, particularly for children with underlying cardiac disease. An overall survival of 46% and favorable neurologic outcomes add credence to this emerging therapy.

Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to summarize the body of available literature on pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in order to delineate current utilization, practices, and outcomes, while highlighting gaps in current knowledge.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases.

STUDY SELECTION

We searched for peer-reviewed original research publications on pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (patients < 18 yr old) and were inclusive of all publication years.

DATA EXTRACTION

Our systematic review used the structured Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Our initial literature search was performed on February 11, 2019, with an updated search performed on August 28, 2019. Three physician reviewers independently assessed the retrieved studies to determine inclusion in the systematic review synthesis. Using selected search terms, a total of 4,095 publications were retrieved, of which 96 were included in the final synthesis. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There were no randomized controlled trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation use in pediatrics. A vast majority of pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation publications were single-center retrospective studies reporting outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Most pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation use in published literature is in cardiac patients. Survival to hospital discharge after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest ranged from 8% to 80% in included studies, and there was an association with improved outcomes in cardiac patients. Thirty-one studies reported neurologic outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, of which only six were prospective follow-up studies. We summarize the available literature on: determination of candidacy, timing of activation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, staffing/logistics, cannulation strategies, outcomes, and the use of simulation for training.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights gaps in our understanding of best practices for pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We summarize current studies available and provide a framework for the development of future studies.

Survival and Mid-Term Neurologic Outcome After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children with refractory cardiac arrest has been shown to improve survival, however, risk factors associated with mortality and neurologic impairments are not well defined. We analyzed our recent institutional experience with pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to identify variables associated with survival and neurocognitive outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Pediatric cardiology and congenital heart surgery departments of a tertiary referral heart center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two consecutive children (median age, 0.3 yr [0.0-1.9 yr]) who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation at our institution during the study period from 2005 to 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Median duration of resuscitation was 60 minutes (42-80 min) and median extracorporeal support duration was 5.4 days (2.2-7.9 d). Forty-three (59.7%) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation events occurred during off-hours, however, neither duration of resuscitation (65 min [49-89 min] vs 51 min [35-80 min]; p = 0.16) nor survival (34.9% vs 37.9%; p = 0.81) differed significantly compared to working hours. Congenital heart disease was present in 84.7% of the patients. Survival to hospital discharge was 36.1%; younger age, higher lactate levels after resuscitation, acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, hepatic injury, and complexity of prior cardiothoracic surgical procedures were significantly associated with mortality. At mid-term follow-up (median, 4.1 yr [3.7-6.1 yr]), 22 patients (84.6% of discharge survivors) were still alive with 77.3% having a favorable neurologic outcome. High lactate levels, arrest location other than ICU, and requirement for renal replacement therapy were associated with unfavorable neurologic outcome. Interestingly, longer duration of resuscitation did not negatively impact survival or neurologic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a valuable tool for the treatment of children with refractory cardiac arrest and a favorable neurologic outcome can be achieved in the majority of survivors even after prolonged resuscitation. Mortality after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in postcardiac surgery children is associated with procedural complexity.

Prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and low flow state are not contraindications for extracorporeal support

Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are poor irrespective of the patient age group and circumstances. Survival to discharge after out-of-hospital arrest in children is less than 10%. Use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is increasing and has been shown to improve outcomes in some situations. However, the candidacy for such augmentation is based on patient selection, institutional practices, and availability of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center. Often, duration of resuscitation, low flow state, presenting pH, and circumstances of arrest dictate candidacy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We present a case of extremely prolonged resuscitation for out-of-hospital arrest in a pediatric patient, and we describe the use of mechanical compression device and transition to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We present the case outcome as well as brief discussion about controversies in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We hope the case provides an opportunity for further discussion regarding opportunities to improve selection, use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and impact outcomes.

Pediatric Post–Cardiac Arrest Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest results in a post–cardiac arrest syndrome, which can evolve in the days to weeks after return of sustained circulation. The components of post–cardiac arrest syndrome are brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischemia/reperfusion response, and persistent precipitating pathophysiology. Pediatric post–cardiac arrest care focuses on anticipating, identifying, and treating this complex physiology to improve survival and neurological outcomes. This scientific statement on post–cardiac arrest care is the result of a consensus process that included pediatric and adult emergency medicine, critical care, cardiac critical care, cardiology, neurology, and nursing specialists who analyzed the past 20 years of pediatric cardiac arrest, adult cardiac arrest, and pediatric critical illness peer-reviewed published literature. The statement summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, management, and prognostication after return of sustained circulation after cardiac arrest, and it provides consensus on the current evidence supporting elements of pediatric post–cardiac arrest care.

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Pediatric Cardiac Population: In Search of a Standard of Care

OBJECTIVES

Although clinical and pharmacologic guidelines exist for the practice of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children (Pediatric Advanced Life Support), the practice of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric cardiac patients remains without universally accepted standards. We aim to explore variation in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedures by surveying clinicians who care for this high-risk patient population.

DESIGN

A 28-item cross-sectional survey was distributed via a web-based platform to clinicians focusing on cardiopulmonary resuscitation practices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team dynamics immediately prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation.

SETTINGS

Pediatric hospitals providing extracorporeal mechanical support services to patients with congenital and/or acquired heart disease.

SUBJECTS

Critical care/cardiology specialist physicians, cardiothoracic surgeons, advanced practice nurse practitioners, respiratory therapists, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Survey web links were distributed over a 2-month period with critical care and/or cardiology physicians comprising the majority of respondents (75%). Nearly all respondents practice at academic/teaching institutions (97%), 89% were from U.S./Canadian institutions and 56% reported less than 10 years of clinical experience. During extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a majority of respondents reported adherence to guideline recommendations for epinephrine bolus dosing (64%). Conversely, 19% reported using only one to three epinephrine bolus doses regardless of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration. Inotropic support is held after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation "most of the time" by 58% of respondents and 94% report using afterload reducing/antihypertensive agents "some" to "most of the time" after achieving full extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Interruptions in chest compressions are common during active cannulation according to 77% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey identify wide variability in resuscitative practices during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pediatric cardiac population. The deviations from established Pediatric Advanced Life Support CPR guidelines support a call for further inquiry into the pharmacologic and logistical care surrounding extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.