Severity of ischemic heart disease and presenting rhythm in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

The impact of door to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on mortality and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest acute myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Few previous studies evaluated the impact of time from the hospital arrival to the implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (door to ECPR time) on outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients.

Methods

50 patients with OHCA who received both ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Cardiovascular Division, NHO Osaka National Hospital were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of door to ECPR time. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Survival analyses were conducted to compare all-cause mortality at 90 days between 2 groups. Neurological outcome at 30 days was also compared between 2 groups using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC).

Results

The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that all-cause mortality at 90 days was significantly higher among patients with door to ECPR time ≥ 25 min compared with those with door to ECPR time < 25 min (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-8.18). The proportion of patients with CPC at 30 days ≤ 2 was significantly higher among patients with shorter door to ECPR time (P = 0.048).

Conclusion

Among patients with OHCA due to acute MI who received ECPR and PCI, the shorter door to ECPR time was associated with the lower mortality and favorable neurological outcomes.

Emergency Department Triage, Transfer Times, and Hospital Mortality of Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Retrospective Replication and Continuation Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to provide new insights into the impact of emergency department (ED) to ICU time on hospital mortality, stratifying patients by academic and nonacademic teaching (NACT) hospitals, and considering Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-IV probability and ED-triage scores.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2009-2020) using data from the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation registry. Patients directly admitted from the ED to the ICU were included from four academic and eight NACT hospitals. Odds ratios (ORs) for mortality associated with ED-to-ICU time were estimated using multivariable regression, both crude and after adjusting for and stratifying by APACHE-IV probability and ED-triage scores.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 28,455 patients were included. The median ED-to-ICU time was 1.9 hours (interquartile range, 1.2-3.1 hr). No overall association was observed between ED-to-ICU time and hospital mortality after adjusting for APACHE-IV probability (p = 0.36). For patients with an APACHE-IV probability greater than 55.4% (highest quintile) and an ED-to-ICU time greater than 3.4 hours the adjusted OR (ORsadjApache) was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.54; p < 0.05) as compared with the reference category (< 1.1 hr). In the academic hospitals, the ORsadjApache for ED-to-ICU times of 1.6-2.3, 2.3-3.4, and greater than 3.4 hours were 1.21 (1.01-1.46), 1.21 (1.00-1.46), and 1.34 (1.10-1.64), respectively. In NACT hospitals, no association was observed (p = 0.07). Subsequently, ORs were adjusted for ED-triage score (ORsadjED). In the academic hospitals the ORsadjED for ED-to-ICU times greater than 3.4 hours was 0.98 (0.81-1.19), no overall association was observed (p = 0.08). In NACT hospitals, all time-ascending quintiles had ORsadjED values of less than 1.0 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with the highest APACHE-IV probability at academic hospitals, a prolonged ED-to-ICU time was associated with increased hospital mortality. We found no significant or consistent unfavorable association in lower APACHE-IV probability groups and NACT hospitals. The association between longer ED-to-ICU time and higher mortality was not found after adjustment and stratification for ED-triage score.

Survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with and without mechanical circulatory support

Aim

The aim of this study was to describe the survival and neurological outcome in patients with OHCA treated with and without mechanical circulatory support (MCS).

Methods

This was a retrospective observational cohort study on patients with OHCA admitted to Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between January 2015 and December 2019. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate 30-day and 30–180-day survival. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between covariates and one-year mortality.

Results

Among 1,015 patients admitted, 698 achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before admission, 101 patients with refractory OHCA received mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and the remaining 216 patients with refractory OHCA did not receive MCS treatment. Survival to hospital discharge was 47% (478/1015). Good neurological outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Categories 1–2 were seen among 92% (438/478) of the patients discharged from hospital. Median low-flow was 15 [8–22] minutes in the ROSC group and 105 [94–123] minutes in the MCS group. Mortality rates were high within the first 30 days, however; 30–180-day survival in patients discharged remained constant over time in both patients with ROSC on admission and patients admitted with MCS. Advanced age > 70 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–3.49), pulseless electrical activity (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.25–4.60) and asystole HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.25–5.95) as initial rhythms were associated with one-year mortality in patients with ROSC.

Conclusions

Short-term survival rates were high among patients with ROSC and patients receiving MCS. Among patients who survived to day 30, landmark analyses showed comparable 180-day survival in the two groups despite long low-flow times in the MCS group. Advanced age and initial non-shockable rhythms were independent predictors of one-year mortality in patients with ROSC on admission.

Intra-Cardiac Arrest Transport and Survival from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Observational Study

AIM

To assess whether intra-cardiac arrest transport as compared to continued on-scene resuscitation was associated with improved clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Denmark.

METHODS

This was an observational study using data from population-based registries in Denmark. Adults (aged ≥18 to ≤65 years) with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) between 2016 and 2018 were included. The primary outcome was survival to 30 days. Time-dependent propensity score matching was used to match patients transported to the hospital within 20 minutes of EMS arrival to patients with assumed on-scene resuscitation (with or without subsequent intra-cardiac arrest transport) at risk of being transported within the same minute.

RESULTS

The full cohort included 2,873 cardiac arrests. The median age was 56 (quartiles: 48 to 62) years, 1987 (69%) were male, and 104 (4%) were transported within 20 minutes. A total of 87 transported patients were matched to 87 patients at risk of being transported based on the propensity score. Although not reaching statistical significance, in comparison with on-scene resuscitation, intra-cardiac arrest transport was associated with increased survival to 30 days (risk ratio, 1.55; 95%CI, 0.99 to 2.44; P = 0.06). Similar associations were observed for return of spontaneous circulation and survival to one year.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients aged 18 to 65 years, intra-cardiac arrest transport was associated with a non-significant increase in survival within 20 minutes of EMS on-scene arrival. However, the results did not eliminate the potential for bias and the results should be interpreted carefully.

Factors associated with shockable versus non-shockable rhythms in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

To identify factors associated with the initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and to assess whether potential differences in outcomes based on the initial rhythm can be explained by patient and event characteristics.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years old) with in-hospital cardiac arrest in 2017 and 2018 were included from the Danish In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (DANARREST). We used population-based registries to obtain data on comorbidities, cardiac procedures, and medications. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival were estimated in separate models including an incremental number of prespecified variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3422 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest were included, of which 639 (19%) had an initial shockable rhythm. Monitored cardiac arrest, witnessed cardiac arrest, and specific cardiac diseases (i.e. ischemic heart disease, dysrhythmias, and valvular heart disease) were associated with initial shockable rhythm. Conversely, higher age, female sex, and specific non-cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g. overweight and obesity, renal disease, and pulmonary cancer) were associated with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Initial shockable rhythm remained strongly associated with increased ROSC (RR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.51-1.76), 30-day survival (RR = 2.31, 95%CI 2.02-2.64), and 1-year survival (RR = 2.36, 95%CI 2.02-2.76) compared to initial non-shockable rhythm in the adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this study, specific patient and cardiac arrest characteristics were associated with initial rhythm in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. However, differences in patient and cardiac arrest characteristics did not fully explain the association with survival for initial shockable rhythm compared to a non-shockable rhythm.

Association of beta-blockers and first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: real-world data from population-based cohorts across two European countries

Aims

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of beta-blockers on first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to establish whether the use of beta-blockers influences first-registered rhythm in OHCA.

Methods and results

We included patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac cause from two large independent OHCA-registries from Denmark and the Netherlands. Beta-blocker use was defined as exposure to either non-selective beta-blockers, β1-selective beta-blockers, or α-β-dual-receptor blockers within 90 days prior to OHCA. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of beta-blockers with first-registered heart rhythm using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 23 834 OHCA-patients in Denmark and 1584 in the Netherlands: 7022 (29.5%) and 519 (32.8%) were treated with beta-blockers, respectively. Use of non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective blockers, was more often associated with non-shockable rhythm than no use of beta-blockers [Denmark: OR 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48–2.52; the Netherlands: OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15–5.49]. Non-selective beta-blocker use was associated with higher proportion of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) than of shockable rhythm (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01–5.65); the association with asystole was of similar magnitude, although not statistically significant compared with shockable rhythm (OR 2.34, 95% CI 0.89–6.18; data on PEA and asystole were only available in the Netherlands). Use of α-β-dual-receptor blockers was significantly associated with non-shockable rhythm in Denmark (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03–1.42) and not significantly in the Netherlands (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.61–3.07).

Conclusion

Non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective beta-blockers, are associated with non-shockable rhythm in OHCA.

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score predicts mortality and neurological outcome in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and subsequent post-cardiac arrest syndrome are often compromised by multi-organ failure. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been used to predict clinical outcome of patients requiring intensive care for multi-organ failure. Thus, the assessment of SOFA score is recommended as a criterion for sepsis. Although post-cardiac arrest patients frequently develop sepsis-like status in ICU, there are limited reports evaluating the SOFA score in post-cardiac arrest patients. We investigated the predictive value of the SOFA score in survival and neurological outcomes in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 231 cardiovascular arrest patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were finally extracted from the institutional consecutive database comprised of 1218 OHCA patients transferred to the institution between January 2015 and July 2018. The SOFA score was calculated on admission and after 48h. Predictors of survival and neurological outcome defined as having cerebral-performance-category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 30 days were determined.

RESULTS

SOFA score was lower in survived patients (5.0 vs 10.0, p<0.001) and those with favorable neurological outcome (5.0 vs 8.0, p<0.001) as compared with the counterparts. The SOFA score on admission was an independent predictor of survival (OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.78; p<0.001) and favorable neurological performance (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69-0.90; p<0.001) at 30 days. Furthermore, a change in SOFA score (48-0h) was predictive of favorable 30-day neurological outcome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the SOFA score in the ICU is useful to predict survival and neurological outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients.

Transfer of essential AED information to treating hospital (TREAT)

BACKGROUND

Defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is increasingly performed by using an Automated External Defibrillator (AED). Therefore presence of a shockable rhythm is recurrently only documented by the AED. However, AED-information is rarely available to the treating physician.

PURPOSE

To determine (1) how often a shockable rhythm was recorded only in the AED; (2) if so, how often information that a shockable rhythm had been present reached the physician.

METHODS

Data on OHCA patients with (presumed) cardiac cause with an AED connected in the years 2012-2014 (Study period 1) and 2016 (Study period 2) in the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARREST) database were collected. We determined how often only the AED had defibrillated. In these patients, we retrospectively analyzed EMS run sheets and hospital discharge letters to determine if a shockable rhythm and/or AED use was correctly noted. In Study period 2, we prospectively contacted the physicians to study whether AED defibrillation was known.

RESULTS

In Study period 1, of 2840 OHCA CPR attempts with (presumed) cardiac cause, 1521 (54%) patients had a shockable rhythm, with 356 patients (13%) receiving AED defibrillation only. Of these patients, 11 hospital discharge letters (4%) contained no information about a shockable rhythm. In Study period 2, 125/1128 patients (11%) received AED defibrillation only; of these, in two cases the shockable rhythm was unknown by the physician.

CONCLUSION

In 11-13% of OHCAs, a shockable rhythm is only seen on the AED-ECG. Adequate transfer to the physician of vital AED-information is essential but not always accomplished.