Gender disparities in the application of public-access AED pads among OHCA patients in public locations

Sex Disparities in Resuscitation Quality Following Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Women are known to be disadvantaged compared with men in the early links of the Chain of Survival, receiving fewer bystander interventions. We aimed to describe sex-based disparities in emergency medical service resuscitation quality and processes of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who were nontraumatic with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest aged ≥16 years where resuscitation was attempted between March 2019 and June 2023. We investigated 18 routinely captured performance metrics and performed adjusted logistic and quantile regression analyses to assess sex-based differences in these metrics. During the study period, 10 161 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest met the eligibility criteria, of whom 3216 (32%) were women. There were no clinically relevant sex-based differences observed in regard to external cardiac compressions; however, women were 34% less likely to achieve a systolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg on arrival at the hospital (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47-0.92]). Furthermore, women had a longer time to 12-lead ECG acquisition after return of spontaneous circulation (median adjusted difference, 1.00 minute [95% CI, 0.38-1.62]) and 33% reduced odds of being transported to a 24-hour percutaneous coronary intervention-capable facility (AOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]). Resuscitation was also terminated sooner for women compared with men (median adjusted difference, -4.82 minutes [95% CI, -6.77 to -2.87]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although external cardiac compression quality did not vary by sex, significant sex-based disparities were seen in emergency medical services processes of care following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Further investigation is required to elucidate the underlying causes of these differences and examine their influence on patient outcomes.

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex - The role of arrest recognition

PURPOSE

To assess whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differed by patient sex among bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of paramedic-attended OHCA in New South Wales (NSW) between January 2017 to December 2019 (restricted to bystander-witnessed cases). Exclusions included OHCA in aged care, medical facilities, with advance care directives, from non-medical causes. Multivariate logistic regression examined the association of patient sex with bystander CPR. Secondary outcomes were OHCA recognition, bystander AED application, initial shockable rhythm, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 4,491cases, females were less likely to receive bystander CPR in private residential (Adjusted Odds ratio [AOR]: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70-0.95) and public locations (AOR: 0.58, 95%CI:0.39-0.88). OHCA recognition during the emergency call was lower for females arresting in public locations (84.6% vs 91.6%, p = 0.002) and this partially explained the association of sex with bystander CPR (∼44%). This difference in recognition was not observed in private residential locations (p = 0.2). Bystander AED use was lower for females (4.8% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001); however, after adjustment for location and other covariates, this relationship was no longer significant (AOR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60-1.12). Females were less likely to be in an initial shockable rhythm (AOR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.44-0.61), but more likely to survive the event (AOR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15-1.56). There was no sex difference in survival to hospital discharge (AOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.77-1.19).

CONCLUSION

OHCA recognition and bystander CPR differ by patient sex in NSW. Research is needed to understand why this difference occurs and to raise public awareness of this issue.

The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals and Call to Action to Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Every 10 years, the American Heart Association (AHA) Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee establishes goals to improve survival from cardiac arrest. These goals align with broader AHA Impact Goals and support the AHA's advocacy efforts and strategic investments in research, education, clinical care, and quality improvement programs. This scientific statement focuses on 2030 AHA emergency cardiovascular care priorities, with a specific focus on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early defibrillation, and neurologically intact survival. This scientific statement also includes aspirational goals, such as establishing cardiac arrest as a reportable disease and mandating reporting of standardized outcomes from different sources; advancing recognition of and knowledge about cardiac arrest; improving dispatch system response, availability, and access to resuscitation training in multiple settings and at multiple time points; improving availability, access, and affordability of defibrillators; providing a focus on early defibrillation, in-hospital programs, and establishing champions for debriefing and review of cardiac arrest events; and expanding measures to track outcomes beyond survival. The ability to track and report data from these broader aspirational targets will potentially require expansion of existing data sets, development of new data sets, and enhanced integration of technology to collect process and outcome data, as well as partnerships of the AHA with national, state, and local organizations. The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, disparities in COVID-19 outcomes for historically excluded racial and ethnic groups, and the longstanding disparities in cardiac arrest treatment and outcomes for Black and Hispanic or Latino populations also contributed to an explicit focus and target on equity for the AHA Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals.

Impact of emergency medical service with advanced life support training for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Republic of Korea: A retrospective multicenter study

Prehospital advanced life support (ALS) has been offered in many countries for patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); however, its effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of emergency medical service (EMS) with ALS training as a nationwide pilot project for adults with OHCA in the Republic of Korea. This retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted between July 2019 and December 2020 using the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium registry. The patients were categorized into an intervention group that received EMS with ALS training and a control group that did not receive EMS with ALS training. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed using matched data to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had a lower rate of supraglottic airway usage (60.5% vs. 75.6%) and a higher rate of undergoing endotracheal intubation (21.7% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). In addition, the intervention group was administered more intravenous epinephrine (59.8% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001) and used mechanical chest compression devices more frequently in prehospital settings than the control group (59.0% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001). Based on the results of multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.87) of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group; however, good neurological outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. In this study, survival to hospital discharge was worse in patients with OHCA who received EMS with ALS training than in those who did not.

Association between nationwide introduction of public-access defibrillation and sudden cardiac death in Japan: An interrupted time-series analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of public-use of automated external defibrillators in reducing the number of sudden cardiac death (SCD) cases at the national level is largely unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate whether the nationwide introduction of public-access-defibrillation (PAD) in 2004 affected the trend of annual sudden cardiac death (SCD) rates in Japan.

METHODS

The number of nationwide SCDs occurring in people aged five years and older was extracted from Japanese demographic statistics (1995-2015). Segmented regression analysis was performed on the interrupted time series data stratified by age and sex to evaluate changes in trends of rates of annual SCDs after the PAD introduction in Japan.

RESULTS

After the PAD introduction in 2004, we observed a significant decrease in trends of annual SCD rates for those aged 5-19 years (the ratio of trends between pre and post PAD introduction (RT) = 0.886, 95%CI: 0.801 to 0.980), 20-34 years (RT = 0.932; 95%CI: 0.906, 0.958), 35-49 years (RT = 0.953; 95%CI: 0.929, 0.977) and 50-64 years (RT = 0.971; 95%CI: 0.971, 0.991). However, the decrease was not observed for those aged 65 years and older. In the age and sex stratified analysis, there was a significant decrease in RT among males aged 5-64 years, and among females 35-49 years.

CONCLUSION

The nationwide trend of annual rate of SCDs between 5 and 64 years old significantly decreased after the introduction of PAD in 2004 in Japan. Further, the reduction was more evident in males.

Effect of Temporal Difference on Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study from an Urban City of Taiwan

Circadian pattern influence on the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been demonstrated. However, the effect of temporal difference on the clinical outcomes of OHCA remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study in an urban city of Taiwan between January 2018 and December 2020 in order to investigate the relationship between temporal differences and the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained (≥24 h) ROSC, and survival to discharge in patients with OHCA. Of the 842 patients with OHCA, 371 occurred in the daytime, 250 in the evening, and 221 at night. During nighttime, there was a decreased incidence of OHCA, but the outcomes of OHCA were significant poor compared to the incidents during the daytime and evening. After multivariate adjustment for influencing factors, OHCAs occurring at night were independently associated with lower probabilities of achieving sustained ROSC (aOR = 0.489, 95% CI: 0.285–0.840, p = 0.009) and survival to discharge (aOR = 0.147, 95% CI: 0.03–0.714, p = 0.017). Subgroup analyses revealed significant temporal differences in male patients, older adult patients, those with longer response times (≥5 min), and witnessed OHCA. The effects of temporal difference on the outcome of OHCA may be a result of physiological factors, underlying etiology of arrest, resuscitative efforts in prehospital and in-hospital stages, or a combination of factors.

Do Women Have a Higher Mortality Risk Than Men following ICU Admission after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Purpose: previous studies showed that women have a higher mortality risk than men after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This sex difference may disappear after adjustment for cardiac arrest characteristics. Most studies also included patients who were not admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We analyzed whether sex impacts the mortality of ICU-admitted OHCA patients. Methods: a retrospective cohort analysis of 1240 OHCA patients admitted to the ICU (310 women, 25%, Age_Median 64.0 (IQR 53.8–73.0)) at an academic hospital in the Netherlands between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality; the secondary outcome was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC) score at ICU discharge and ICU length of stay (ICU LOS). Results: we found no association between sex and 90-day mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.867; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.678–1.108) after adjusting for relevant cardiac arrest characteristics. Similarly, we found no difference for favorable CPC score (OR 1.117; 95% CI 0.777–1.608) or ICU LOS between sexes (Beta 0.428; 95% CI −0.442 to 1.298). Conclusions: after adjusting for cardiac arrest characteristics, we found no difference between women and men with respect to 90-day mortality, ICU LOS, and CPC score.

Gender and location disparities in prehospital bystander AED usage

BACKGROUND

With bystander AED usage being critical for prehospital cardiac arrest patient outcomes, it is important to analyze if the gender and location disparities found in bystander CPR rates also exist for bystander AED usage.

METHODS

Using the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) database, 1,144,969 bystander AED cases were analyzed on the basis of gender and location. Chi-squared testing checked for statistical significance and effect size was measured using relative risk (RR).

RESULTS

Using female patients as a baseline, the RR for bystander AED usage for male patients was 1.34 (95% CI [1.3310, 1.3557], p < 0.001) indicating male patients are 34% more likely to receive bystander AED usage compared to female patients. Analyzing bystander AED usage per urbanity region using urban patients as a baseline, resulted in a RR of 0.87 for suburban patients (95% CI [0.8572, 0.8833], p < 0.001), 0.39 for rural patients (95% CI [0.3849, 0.3971], p < 0.001), and 0.36 for frontier patients (95% CI [0.3515, 0.3726], p < 0.001) showing a sharp decline in the chance of bystander AED usage in rural and frontier areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients are less likely to receive bystander AED usage compared to male patients. To resolve these disparities increased public awareness is necessary that supports AED usage on females as socially acceptable and necessary for patient outcomes. Furthermore, given bystander AED usage among males and females declined as cardiac arrest locations became more remote, improvements in rural and frontier AED availability and training are necessary to increase bystander AED usage rates in those regions.