Seizure-like presentation in OHCA creates barriers to dispatch recognition of cardiac arrest

Barriers for Responding to Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Emergency Medical Calls: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Rapid recognition of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) is a critical component to prompt initiation of bystander interventions. We aimed to investigate barriers for responding to POHCA during emergency medical calls.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included all POHCA calls (aged 0-18 years) from the emergency dispatch center in the Capital Region of Denmark between 2018 and 2021 and excluded POHCAs with no resuscitation order, found dead, where trained health professionals were on site, or where there was no possibility for initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A qualitative analysis was undertaken. POHCA calls were divided according to the speed of telecommunicator-recognition into 3 groups: POHCA recognition within 90 seconds (group 1), POHCAs recognition >90 seconds (group 2), and POHCAs recognized by the emergency medical services at ambulance arrival (group 3). A total of 20 calls were included. We identified 3 major barriers to telecommunicator recognition of POHCA. First, prolonged conversations between callers and telecommunicators focusing on the cause of the child's condition rather than adherence to the assessment of consciousness and breathing. Second, challenges in assessing breathing such as cases where the child had agonal or unregular breathing or gasping breaths. Finally, callers who were unable to communicate or follow instructions from the telecommunicator.

CONCLUSIONS

Telecommunicator recognition of POHCA is challenged by factors such as prolonged conversations focusing on causes rather than initiating bystander interventions, barriers in assessing breathing, as well as callers' abilities to partake in communication with telecommunicators. Efforts to address these barriers in current dispatch protocols may improve recognition of POHCA.

2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Optimising telecommunicator recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review

Aim

To summarize existing literature and identify knowledge gaps regarding barriers and enablers of telecommunicators' recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

This scoping review was undertaken by an International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Basic Life Support scoping review team and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed and explored barriers and enablers of telecommunicator recognition of OHCA. We searched Ovid MEDLINE® and Embase and included articles from database inception till June 18th, 2024.

Results

We screened 9,244 studies and included 62 eligible studies on telecommunicator recognition of OHCA. The studies ranged in methodology. The majority were observational studies of emergency calls. The barriers most frequently described to OHCA recognition were breathing status and agonal breathing. The most frequently tested enabler for recognition was a variety of dispatch protocols focusing on breathing assessment. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified, which found no difference in OHCA recognition with the addition of machine learning alerting telecommunicators in suspected OHCA cases.

Conclusion

Most studies were observational, assessed barriers to recognition of OHCA and compared different dispatch protocols. Only one RCT was identified. Randomized trials should be conducted to inform how to improve telecommunicator recognition of OHCA, including recognition of pediatric OHCAs and assessment of dispatch protocols.

2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Effectiveness of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in private home versus public locations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DACPR) significantly improves the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. However, the effectiveness of DACPR may vary depending on the location of the cardiac arrest. This study compares DACPR outcomes in private homes versus public places.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all OHCA incidents with emergency medical service (EMS) activation in Taichung City, Taiwan, from May 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022. Trained dispatch reviewers analyzed audio recordings of the included cases to extract DACPR indicators. The primary outcome was the number of successful chest compressions performed. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of OHCA recognition, call-to-chest compression time, call-to-OHCA recognition time, reasons for failure to identify OHCA, and reasons for failure to perform chest compressions or complete instructions. A subgroup analysis examined the caller-patient relationship in both locations.

RESULTS

The study included 1,160 OHCA patients, with 1,009 cases occurring in private homes and 151 in public places. Patients in public places were younger (60 vs 75 years), more often male (81.5 % vs 59.9 %), and had a higher rate of witnessed collapse compared to those in private homes (40.4 % vs 26.7 %, p < 0.001). Chest compressions were less frequently administered in public places (41.1 % vs 65.5 %, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.48 [0.31 to 0.75]). Public place cases had a lower proportion of OHCA recognition (51.9 % vs 76.9 %) and longer call-to-OHCA recognition times (108 vs 79 s) than those in private homes. Callers in public places more often encountered hazardous environments or physical barriers (16.4 % vs 8.3 %) and refused to execute instructions (11.0 % vs 4.1 %), but faced fewer emotional or psychological obstacles (0 % vs 8.3 %). Family members in private homes had a higher proportion of chest compressions (67.1 % vs 53.8 %, aOR: 1.81 [1.15 to 2.83]) and shorter times to chest compression (160 s vs 171 s, adjusted beta: -30 s [-55.6 to -6.3]) compared to non-family members.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated reduced DACPR effectiveness in public places compared to private homes, potentially influenced by caller factors, environmental conditions, and the caller-patient relationship. Developing location-specific strategies is essential to enhance DACPR effectiveness.

Misinformation on first aid for seizures communicated through the fastest growing social media platform: A cross-sectional study of TikTok content

INTRODUCTION

Social media platforms have significant potential to enhance public knowledge on how to respond to generalised seizures. Among the platforms, TikTok emerges as a standout performer, demonstrating exceptional user engagement.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the quality of content on first aid for seizures posted on TikTok.

METHODS

TikTok videos providing instructions on first aid for generalised seizures and having at least 100,000 views were analysed for completeness and correctness of the advice using a 21-item checklist. Any misleading recommendations suggesting inappropriate actions were collected from the videos and users' comments on the videos.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible videos had a total of 19,502,200 views. The videos frequently omitted key guidelines-concordant instructions on first aid for seizures, in particular, to lay the person down to prevent falling (missed in 84.2% of the videos), avoid moving the person unless they are in danger (89.5%), check the person's breathing once the seizure has ended (89.5%) and commence cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the person remains unresponsive and not breathing normally (94.7%). Nine videos (47.4%) contained misleading instructions, most commonly to put the person on their side or otherwise move them during the seizure. Multiple comments to the videos advocated futile and dangerous actions, for instance, putting objects into the person's mouth, restraining, or hitting the person.

CONCLUSION

TikTok videos convey information on first aid for seizures to multi-million audiences concurrently propagating incomplete, inaccurate and potentially harmful non-evidence-based advice. Urgent research and regulatory efforts are needed to develop effective strategies to combat the misinformation spread.

[Out-of-hospital resuscitation: where are we today?]

In circulatory arrest, the first minutes and hours are crucial - rapid and adequate care can significantly increase the chances of survival. A large number of disciplines are involved in the recommendations and guidelines for out-of-hospital resuscitation. In particular, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) as well as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) are leading the way. Both the ambulance service and the accepting hospital are faced with major challenges in this regard. This article will illustrate the most important steps during and after resuscitation and discuss innovations.

The experience of online cardiac arrest video use for education and research: A qualitative interview study completed in partnership with survivors and co-survivors

Background

Swift recognition of cardiac arrest is required for survival, however failure to recognize (and delayed response) is common. Studying online cardiac arrest videos may aid recognition, however the ethical implications of this are unknown. We examined their use from the perspective of persons with lived experience of cardiac arrest, seeking to understand the experience of having one's cardiac arrest recorded and available online.

Methods

We gathered qualitative data using focused interviews of persons affected by cardiac arrest. Inductive thematic analysis was performed, as well as a deductive ethical analysis. Co-researcher survivors and co-survivors were involved in all stages of this project.

Findings

We identified themes of 'shock, hurt and helplessness' and 'surreality and reality' to describe the experience of having one's (or a family member's) cardiac arrest captured and distributed online. Participants provided guidance on the use of online videos for education and research, emphasising beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence, and justice.

Conclusions

Finding one's own, or a family member's cardiac arrest video online is shocking and potentially harmful for families. If ethical principles are followed however, there may be acceptable procedures for the use of online videos of cardiac arrest for education or research purposes. The careful use of online videos of cardiac arrest for education and research may help improve recognition and response, though additional research is required to confirm or refute this claim.

When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model

BACKGROUND

A machine-learning model trained to recognize emergency calls regarding Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) was tested in clinical practice at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from September 2018 to December 2019. We aimed to investigate emergency call characteristics where the machine-learning model failed to recognize OHCA or misinterpreted a call as being OHCA.

METHODS

All emergency calls were linked to the dispatch database and verified OHCAs were identified by linkage to the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Calls with either false negative or false positive predictions of OHCA were evaluated by trained auditors. Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute numbers and percentages reported.

RESULTS

The machine-learning model processed 169,236 calls to Copenhagen EMS and suspected 5,811 (3.4%) of the calls as OHCA, resulting in 84.5% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. Among OHCAs not recognised by machine-learning model, a condition completely different from OHCA was presented by caller in 31% of the cases. In 28% of unrecognised calls, patient was reported breathing normally, and language barriers were identified in 23% of the cases. Among falsely suspected OHCA, the patient was reported unconscious in 28% of the cases, and in 13% of the false positive cases the machine-learning model interpreted calls regarding dead patients with irreversible signs of death as OHCA.

CONCLUSION

Continuous optimization of the language model is needed to improve the prediction of OHCA and thereby improve sensitivity and specificity of the machine-learning model on recognising OHCA in emergency telephone calls.

Assessment of telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using a standardized tool for audio review

OBJECTIVE

Telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) is a critical component of optimized out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care. We assessed a pilot tool to capture American Heart Association (AHA) T-CPR measures and T-CPR coaching by telecommunicators using audio review.

METHODS

Using a pilot tool, we conducted a retrospective review of 911 call audio from 65 emergency medical services-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Data collection included events (e.g., OHCA recognition), time intervals, and coaching quality measures. We calculated summary statistics for all performance and quality measures.

RESULTS

Among 65 cases, the patients' mean age was 64.7 years (SD: 14.6) and 17 (26.2%) were women. Telecommunicator recognition occurred in 72% of cases (47/65). Among 18 non-recognized cases, reviewers determined 12 (66%) were not recognizable based on characteristics of the call. Median time-to-recognition was 76 seconds (n = 40; IQR:39-138), while median time-to-first-instructed-compression was 198 seconds (n = 26; IQR:149-233). In 36 cases where coaching was needed, coaching on compression-depth occurred in 27 (75%); -rate in 28 (78%); and chest recoil in 10 (28%) instances. In 30 cases where repositioning was needed, instruction to position the patient's body flat occurred in 18 (60%) instances, on-back in 22 (73%) instances, and on-ground in 22 (73%) instances.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful collection of data to calculate AHA T-CPR measures using a pilot tool for audio review revealed performance near AHA benchmarks, although coaching instructions did not occur in many instances. Application of this standardized tool may aid in T-CPR quality review.

Swedish dispatchers’ compliance with the American Heart Association performance goals for dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its association with survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective study

Aim

We aimed 1) to investigate how Swedish dispatchers perform during emergency calls in accordance with the American Heart Association (AHA) goals for dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR), 2) calculate the potential impact on 30-day survival.

Methods

This observational study includes a random sample of 1000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) emergency ambulance calls during 2018 in Sweden. Voice logs were audited to evaluate dispatchers’ handling of emergency calls according to the AHA performance goals. Number of possible additional survivors was estimated assuming the timeframes of the AHA performance goals was achieved.

Results

A total of 936 cases were included. An OHCA was recognized by a dispatcher in 79% (AHA goal 75%). In recognizable OHCA, dispatchers recognized 85% (AHA goal 95%). Dispatch-directed compressions were given in 61% (AHA goal 75%). Median time to OHCA recognition was 113 s [interquartile range (IQR), 62, 204 s] (AHA goal < 60 s). The first dispatch-directed compression was performed at a median time of 240 s [IQR, 176, 332 s] (AHA goal < 90 s). If eligible patients receive dispatch-directed compressions within the AHA 90 s goal, 73 additional lives may be saved; if all cases are recognized within the AHA 60 s goal, 25 additional lives may be saved.

Conclusions

The AHA policy statement serves as a benchmark for all emergency medical dispatch centres (EMDC). Additional effort is needed at Swedish EMDC to achieve AHA goals for DA-CPR. Our study suggests that if EMDC further optimize handling of OHCA calls in accordance with AHA goals, many more lives may be saved.

Basic life support and systems saving lives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe recent science in basic life support (BLS) after cardiac arrest and how evolving knowledge in resuscitation is changing current guidelines and practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

The core elements of BLS have remained mostly unchanged since 2005 when Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation recommendations were changed from 2 ventilations to 15 compressions and up to three stacked shocks for shockable rhythms, to 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and single shocks. Since 2010, basic life support has largely focused on the importance of providing high-quality CPR for professional and lay rescuers alike. The most recent resuscitation updates has seen an increased focus on the systems perspective. The 'Systems Saving Lives' concept emphasizes the interconnection between community and Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The main changes in current resuscitation practice are within three important basic life support domains: recognition of cardiac arrest, interaction between rescuers and EMS and improving resuscitation quality.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the importance of strengthening both community and emergency medical services efforts to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest. Strategies that enhance the communication and collaboration between lay rescuers and professional resuscitation systems are important new avenues to pursue in developing systems that save more lives.

Features of Emergency Medical System calls that facilitate or inhibit Emergency Medical Dispatcher recognition that a patient is in, or at imminent risk of, cardiac arrest: A systematic mixed studies review

Aim

To identify and appraise evidence relating to the features of an Emergency Medicine System call interaction that enable, or inhibit, an Emergency Medical Dispatcher’s recognition that a patient is in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, or at imminent risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Data sources included Medline, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, AMED and OpenGrey. Stakeholder resources were screened and experts in resuscitation were asked to review the studies identified. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Synthesis was completed using a segregated mixed research synthesis approach.

Results

Thirty-two studies were included in the review. Three main themes were identified: Key features of the Emergency Medical Service call interaction; Managing the Emergency Medical Service call; Emotional distress.

Conclusion

A dominant finding is the difficulty in recognising abnormal/agonal breathing during the Emergency Medical Service call. The interaction between the caller and the Emergency Medical Dispatcher is critical in the recognition of patients who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Emergency Medical Dispatchers adapt their approach to the Emergency Medical Service call, and regular training for Emergency Medical Dispatchers is recommended to optimise out-of-hospital cardiac arrest recognition. Further research is required with a focus on the Emergency Medical Service call interaction of patients who are alive at the time of the Emergency Medical Service call and who later deteriorate into OHCA.

PROSPERO registration: CRD42019155458.

Seizure-like activity at the onset of emergency medical service-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study

Aims

Emergency medical service (EMS) may detect seizure-like activity in addition to agonal breathing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study investigates the incidence and predictors of seizure-like activity in nontraumatic, EMS-witnessed OHCA and their association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study explored EMS-recorded concomitant signs/symptoms that lead to the requirement of advanced life support in patients with nontraumatic, EMS-witnessed OHCA. Seizure-like activity includes abnormal/tonic movements and eyeball deviation. Sudden OHCA was defined by the absence of signs/symptoms of impending cardiac arrest at EMS contact or progressive circulatory/respiratory depressions after the EMS contact. Neurologically favorable outcomes were defined as the cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2 at discharge.

Results

From April 2012 to March 2020, 465 patients were studied. The incidence of seizure-like activity at cardiac arrest onset was 12.7% (59/465) in all patients with nontraumatic, EMS-witnessed OHCA. Seizure-like activity was common during shockable initial rhythm; in patients with “sudden” OHCA; and in patients who were younger, male, or had a presumed cardiac etiology. In a boosting tree, shockable initial rhythm, “sudden” OHCA, and presumed cardiac etiology were major factors that predicted the incidence of seizure-like activity. Multivariate logistic regression models including and excluding OHCA characteristics revealed that both seizure-like activity and agonal breathing recorded during EMS-witnessed OHCA were associated with favorable outcomes.

Conclusions

Seizure-like activity is a major sign/symptom of the onset of “sudden” cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology, particularly in patients with shockable initial rhythms. Such activity were significantly associated with neurologically favorable outcomes.

[Basic life support]

The European Resuscitation Council has produced these basic life support guidelines, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include cardiac arrest recognition, alerting emergency services, chest compressions, rescue breaths, automated external defibrillation (AED), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality measurement, new technologies, safety, and foreign body airway obstruction.

Activation of citizen responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss different approaches to citizen responder activation and possible future solutions for improved citizen engagement in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Activating volunteer citizens to OHCA has the potential to improve OHCA survival by increasing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation. Accordingly, citizen responder systems have become widespread in numerous countries despite very limited evidence of their effect on survival or cost-effectiveness. To date, only one randomized trial has investigated the effect of citizen responder activation for which the outcome was bystander CPR. Recent publications are of observational nature with high risk of bias. A scoping review published in 2020 provided an overview of available citizen responder systems and their differences in who, when, and how to activate volunteer citizens. These differences are further discussed in this review.

SUMMARY

Implementation of citizen responder programs holds the potential to improve bystander intervention in OHCA, with advancing technology offering new improvement possibilities. Information on how to best activate citizen responders as well as the effect on survival following OHCA is warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of citizen responder programs.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support

The European Resuscitation Council has produced these basic life support guidelines, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include cardiac arrest recognition, alerting emergency services, chest compressions, rescue breaths, automated external defibrillation (AED), CPR quality measurement, new technologies, safety, and foreign body airway obstruction.

Machine learning can support dispatchers to better and faster recognize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls: A retrospective study

AIM

Fast recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by dispatchers might increase survival. The aim of this observational study of emergency calls was to (1) examine whether a machine learning framework (ML) can increase the proportion of calls recognizing OHCA within the first minute compared with dispatchers, (2) present the performance of ML with different false positive rate (FPR) settings, (3) examine call characteristics influencing OHCA recognition.

METHODS

ML can be configured with different FPR settings, i.e., more or less inclined to suspect an OHCA depending on the predefined setting. ML OHCA recognition within the first minute is evaluated with a 1.5 FPR as the primary endpoint, and other FPR settings as secondary endpoints. ML was exposed to a random sample of emergency calls from 2018. Voice logs were manually audited to evaluate dispatchers time to recognition.

RESULTS

Of 851 OHCA calls, the ML recognized 36% (n = 305) within 1 min compared with 25% (n = 213) by dispatchers. The recognition rate at any time during the call was 86% for ML and 84% for dispatchers, with a median time to recognition of 72 versus 94 s. OHCA recognized by both ML and dispatcher showed a 28 s mean difference in favour of ML (P < 0.001). ML with higher FPR settings reduced recognition times.

CONCLUSION

ML recognized a higher proportion of OHCA within the first minute compared with dispatchers and has the potential to be a supportive tool during emergency calls. The optimal FPR settings need to be evaluated in a prospective study.

Unrecognized Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Symptoms during Thailand’s Emergency Medical Services

BACKGROUND: To improve survival rate, the main focus of adult cardiac arrest management includes rapid recognition, prompt administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation for shockable rhythms, post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care, and identification and treatment of underlying causes. This study aimed to identify the determinants of unrecognized cardiac arrest, and to study the recognition rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by emergency medical services call handlers. METHODS: We included OHCA patients who were transferred to hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of Srinagarind hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand, from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2020. The primary outcome was to identify symptoms that lead to an unrecognized cardiac arrest by the EMS call handlers. Secondary outcomes were to identify the recognition rate of OHCA by emergency medical services call handlers, and assess the outcome of CPR performed on OHCA patients. RESULTS: There were a total of 58 patients in the present study, 26 patients (44.8%) and 32 patients (55.2%) belonged to the unrecognized and recognized cardiac arrest groups, respectively. The most common symptoms that led to unrecognized cardiac arrest were a state of unconsciousness (46.2%), major trauma (15.4%), and seizure-like activity (11.5%). The rate of ROSC was higher in the unrecognized cardiac arrest group (34.6% vs. 15.6%) but the rate of survival to hospital discharge was higher in the recognized cardiac arrest group (6.3% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Falling unconscious is the most common symptom of unrecognized OHCA cases seen by EMS in Thailand. Basic life support, especially an immediate assessment of a patient’s respiratory status should be taught in health programs in school or through public service channels.

'I think he's dead': A cohort study of the impact of caller declarations of death during the emergency call on bystander CPR

BACKGROUND

In emergency calls for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), dispatchers are instrumental in the provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) through the recruitment of the caller. We explored the impact of caller perception of patient viability on initial recognition of OHCA by the dispatcher, rates of bystander CPR and early patient survival outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 422 emergency calls where OHCA was recognised by the dispatcher and resuscitation was attempted by paramedics. We used the call recordings, dispatch data, and electronic patient care records to identify caller statements that the patient was dead, initial versus delayed recognition of OHCA by the dispatcher, caller acceptance to perform CPR, provision of bystander-CPR, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and ROSC on arrival at the Emergency Department.

RESULTS

Initial recognition of OHCA by the dispatcher was more frequent in cases with a declaration of death by the caller than in cases without (92%, 73/79 vs. 66%, 227/343, p < 0.001). Callers who expressed such a view (19% of cases) were more likely to decline CPR (38% vs. 10%, adjusted odds ratio 4.59, 95% confidence interval 2.49-8.52, p < 0.001). Yet, 15% (12/79) of patients described as non-viable by callers achieved ROSC.

CONCLUSION

Caller statements that the patient is dead are helpful for dispatchers to recognise OHCA early, but potentially detrimental when recruiting the caller to perform CPR. There is an opportunity to improve the rate of bystander-CPR and patient outcomes if dispatchers are attentive to caller statements about viability.