A pilot evaluation of respiratory mechanics during prehospital manual ventilation

Towards a common terminology of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Manual and mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are critical yet poorly understood components of resuscitation care. In recent years, intra-arrest ventilation has been the subject of a growing number of laboratory and clinical investigations. Essential components to accurately interpret or reproduce original investigations are the exact measurement and transparent reporting of key ventilation parameters, such as volumes and airway pressures obtained during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest compressions lead to frequent intrathoracic and intrapulmonary pressure rises which interact with artificial ventilation. The resulting unique phenomena during continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation and an advanced airway, necessitate a nuanced conceptualization supported by a common terminology. Based on previous original investigations and observations, we describe intra-arrest ventilation parameters and propose a common terminology integrating established and novel concepts. The proposed terminology may serve as a methodological and reporting consideration for future research of intra-arrest ventilation. Additionally, it may serve as a foundation for an authoritative scientific consensus process, which may further facilitate the transparent reporting and reproducible science needed to understand cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve survival for cardiac arrest patients.

Ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A narrative review

Ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is vital to achieve optimal oxygenation but continues to be a subject of ongoing debate. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of various components and challenges of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, highlighting key areas of uncertainty in the current understanding of ventilation management. It addresses the pulmonary pathophysiology during cardiac arrest, the importance of adequate alveolar ventilation, recommendations concerning the maintenance of airway patency, tidal volumes and ventilation rates in both synchronous and asynchronous ventilation. Additionally, it discusses ventilation adjuncts such as the impedance threshold device, the role of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation, and passive oxygenation. Finally, this review offers directions for future research.

The effects of mechanical versus bag-valve ventilation on gas exchange during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency department patients: A randomized controlled trial (CPR-VENT)

INTRODUCTION

Effective ventilation is crucial for successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Previous studies indicate that higher arterial oxygen levels (PaO2) during CPR increase the chances of successful resuscitation. However, the advantages of mechanical ventilators over bag-valve ventilation for achieving optimal PaO2 during CPR remain uncertain.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized trial involving non-traumatic adult cardiac arrest patients who received CPR in the ED. After intubation, patients were randomly assigned to ventilate with a mechanical ventilator (MV) or bag valve ventilation (BV). In MV group, ventilation settings were: breath rate 10/minute, tidal volume 6-7 ml/kg, inspiratory time 1 second, positive end-expiratory pressure 0 cm water, inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) 100%. The primary outcome was to compare the difference in PaO2 from arterial blood gases (ABG) obtained 4-10 minutes later during CPR between both groups.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomized (30 in each group). The study population consisted of: 57% male, median age 62 years, 37% received bystander CPR, and 20% had an initial shockable rhythm. Median time from arrest to intubation was 24 minutes. The median PaO2 was not significantly different in the BV compared to MV [36.5 mmHg (14.0-70.0) vs. 29.0 mmHg (15.0-70.0), P = 0.879]. Other ABG parameters and rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

In ED patients with refractory cardiac arrest, arterial oxygen levels during CPR were comparable between patients ventilated with MV and BV. Mechanical ventilation is at least feasible and safe during CPR in intubated cardiac arrest patients.

Association of small adult ventilation bags with return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the impact of tidal volumes delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) to adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A large urban EMS system changed from standard adult ventilation bags to small adult bags. We hypothesized that the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at the end of EMS care would increase after this change.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis evaluating adults treated with advanced airway placement for nontraumatic OHCA between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021. We compared rates of ROSC, ventilation rate, and mean end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) by minute before and after the smaller ventilation bag implementation using linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1,994 patients included, 1,331 (67%) were treated with a small adult bag. ROSC at the end of EMS care was lower in the small bag cohort than the large bag cohort, 33% vs 40% (p = 0.003). After adjustment, small bag use was associated with lower odds of ROSC at the end of EMS care [OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 - 0.91]. Ventilation rates did not differ between cohorts. ETCO2 values were lower in the large bag cohort (33.2 ± 17.2 mmHg vs. 36.9 ± 19.2 mmHg, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Use of a small adult bag during OHCA was associated with lower odds of ROSC at the end of EMS care. The effects on acid base status, hemodynamics, and delivered minute ventilation remain unclear and warrant additional study.

Continuous chest compressions are associated with higher peak inspiratory pressures when compared to 30:2 in an experimental cardiac arrest model

BACKGROUND

Ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has long been a part of the standard treatment during cardiac arrests. Ventilation is usually given either during continuous chest compressions (CCC) or during a short pause after every 30 chest compressions (30:2). There is limited knowledge of how ventilation is delivered if it effects the hemodynamics and if it plays a role in the occurrence of lung injuries. The aim of this study was to compare ventilation parameters, hemodynamics, blood gases and lung injuries during experimental CPR given with CCC and 30:2 in a porcine model.

METHODS

Sixteen pigs weighing approximately 33 kg were randomized to either receive CPR with CCC or 30:2. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by passing an electrical current through the heart. CPR was started after 3 min and given for 20 min. Chest compressions were provided mechanically with a chest compression device and ventilations were delivered manually with a self-inflating bag and 12 l/min of oxygen. During the experiment, ventilation parameters and hemodynamics were sampled continuously, and arterial blood gases were taken every five minutes. After euthanasia and cessation of CPR, the lungs and heart were removed in block and visually examined followed by sampling of lung tissue which were examined using microscopy.

RESULTS

In the CCC group and the 30:2 group, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 58.6 and 35.1 cmH2O (p < 0.001), minute volume (MV) 2189.6 and 1267.1 ml (p < 0.001), peak expired carbon dioxide (PECO2) 28.6 and 39.4 mmHg (p = 0.020), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) 50.2 and 61.1 mmHg (p = 0.013) and pH 7.3 and 7.2 (p = 0.029), respectively. Central venous pressure (CVP) decreased more over time in the 30:2 group (p = 0.023). All lungs were injured, but there were no differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation during CCC resulted in a higher PIP, MV and pH and lower PECO2 and PaCO2, showing that ventilation mode during CPR can affect ventilation parameters and blood gases.

The Role of Chest Compressions on Ventilation during Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Background: There is growing interest in the quality of manual ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but accurate assessment of ventilation parameters remains a challenge. Waveform capnography is currently the reference for monitoring ventilation rate in intubated patients, but fails to provide information on tidal volumes and inspiration-expiration timing. Moreover, the capnogram is often distorted when chest compressions (CCs) are performed during ventilation compromising its reliability during CPR. Our main purpose was to characterize manual ventilation during CPR and to assess how CCs may impact on ventilation quality. Methods: Retrospective analysis were performed of CPR recordings fromtwo databases of adult patients in cardiac arrest including capnogram, compression depth, and airway flow, pressure and volume signals. Using automated signal processing techniques followed by manual revision, individual ventilations were identified and ventilation parameters were measured. Oscillations on the capnogram plateau during CCs were characterized, and its correlation with compression depth and airway volume was assessed. Finally, we identified events of reversed airflow caused by CCs and their effect on volume and capnogram waveform. Results: Ventilation rates were higher than the recommended 10 breaths/min in 66.7% of the cases. Variability in ventilation rates correlated with the variability in tidal volumes and other ventilatory parameters. Oscillations caused by CCs on capnograms were of high amplitude (median above 74%) and were associated with low pseudo-volumes (median 26 mL). Correlation between the amplitude of those oscillations with either the CCs depth or the generated passive volumes was low, with correlation coefficients of -0.24 and 0.40, respectively. During inspiration and expiration, reversed airflow events caused opposed movement of gases in 80% of ventilations. Conclusions: Our study confirmed lack of adherence between measured ventilation rates and the guideline recommendations, and a substantial dispersion in manual ventilation parameters during CPR. Oscillations on the capnogram plateau caused by CCs did not correlate with compression depth or associated small tidal volumes. CCs caused reversed flow during inspiration, expiration and in the interval between ventilations, sufficient to generate volume changes and causing oscillations on capnogram. Further research is warranted to assess the impact of these findings on ventilation quality during CPR.

Ventilation rates measured by capnography during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitations and their association with return of spontaneous circulation

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) recommend a ventilation rate of 8-10 per minute yet acknowledge that few data exist to guide recommendations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of continuous capnography to measure ventilation rates and the association with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study. We included all OHCA during a two-year period and excluded traumatic and pediatric patients. Ventilations were recorded using non-invasive continuous capnography. Blinded medically trained team members manually annotated all ventilations. Four techniques were used to analyze ventilation rate. The primary outcome was sustained prehospital ROSC. Secondary outcomes were vital status at the end of prehospital care and survival to hospital admission. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed.

RESULTS

A total of 790 OHCA were analyzed. Only 386 (49%) had useable capnography data. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final study cohort was 314 patients. The median ventilation rate per minute was 7 (IQR 5.4-8.5). Only 70 (22%) received a guideline-compliant ventilation rate of 8-10 per minute. Sixty-two (20%) achieved the primary outcome. No statistically significant associations were observed between any of the ventilation parameters and patient outcomes in both univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

We failed to detect an association between intra-arrest ventilation rates measured by continuous capnography and proximal patient outcomes after OHCA. Capnography has poor reliability as a measure of ventilation rate. Achieving guideline-compliant ventilation rates remains challenging.