The concurrent administration of imatinib with extracorporeal photopheresis leads to complete and durable responses in patients with refractory sclerotic type chronic graft-versus-host disease

Nilotinib efficacy and safety as salvage treatment following imatinib intolerance and/or inefficacy in steroid refractory chronic graft-versus-host-disease (SR-cGVHD): a prospective, multicenter, phase II study on behalf of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)

Imatinib is used for patients with SR-cGVHD. However, in 50% of cases imatinib is discontinued due to intolerance or inefficacy. In order to investigate nilotinib's role as salvage therapy in those patients, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase II study. (NCT02891395). Patients with SR-cGVHD were included to receive imatinib. Patients who stopped imatinib due to intolerance or inefficacy switched to Nilotinib. The primary endpoint was defined as the week-12 response rate to Nilotinib. The response was considered successful if superior to the 30% endpoint. Sixty-two patients started the IM-phase. Fourteen patients (22%) discontinued imatinib before week 12 due to: cGVHD progression (10%) or TKI-class-specific intolerance (12%). At week 12, we observed complete remission in 13 patients (21%) and partial response in 8 patients (13%). Twenty-nine patients switched to Nilotinib. Nilotinib response at week-12 was observed in 6 patients (21%) while 23 patients (79%) discontinued Nilotinib due to intolerance/cGVHD progression. The primary endpoint was not reached. This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of imatinib in patients with steroid refractory cGVHD. It failed to demonstrate the efficacy of nilotinib as a salvage therapy in patients who were intolerant/unresponsive to imatinib.

A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Closed System Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Children With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

BACKGROUND

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) therapy involves intensive immunosuppression, which is associated with significant infectious risk. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is used to treat SR-aGvHD and is considered to be more immunomodulatory than immunosuppressive. However, pediatric data are mostly retrospective and often involve multi-step ECP that includes apheresis followed by separate photosensitizing/reinfusion on another device.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single-device ECP system in children with SR-aGvHD.

STUDY DESIGN

Open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study of the THERAKOS® CELLEX® Photopheresis System in children/young adults aged 1 to 21 years with SR-aGvHD. Patients were treated 3 times per week for 4 weeks, then twice weekly through week 12 while maintaining standard aGvHD prophylaxis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving overall response (OR) at day 28 without the addition of next-line systemic treatment. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving OR at weeks 8 and 12; the mean weekly steroid dose at weeks 4, 8, and 12; and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine children (median age, 8 years) were enrolled. OR was 55% by day 28, 74% by week 8, and 79% by week 12. Progressive improvements were observed in the skin and the gastrointestinal tract. Mean steroid dose decreased from 1.54 mg/kg/day at baseline to 0.90 mg/kg/day at week 4; 35% of patients achieved >50% steroid dose reduction at week 4 and 75% achieved >50% steroid dose reduction at week 12. Of 168 TEAEs reported among 25 patients (86%), 28 (17%) events were infections and 14 (8%) events were considered to be probably treatment related (all nonserious). Of 627 ECP treatments administered in children/young adults, 68% required blood priming. Treatment-related AEs, including hypotension, hypocalcemia, central line infection, and catheter-site bruising, were rare (1 event each). Three deaths occurred and were deemed unrelated to ECP by the investigators.

CONCLUSION

Use of the THERAKOS® CELLEX® Photopheresis System was effective in children with SR-aGvHD, with more than half experiencing improvement by day 28 and further responses observed over 12 weeks. Very few TEAEs were attributable to ECP, and no new safety signals were observed.

The clinical landscape of chronic graft-versus-host disease management in 2021

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an important systemic complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with heterogeneous, multi-organ involvement that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite significant advances in understanding the complex pathophysiology driving the disease, curative treatment options remain suboptimal. The past decade, however, has seen much growth in collaborative research efforts and standardization of criteria for clinical trials that have led to discovery of several new second-line therapies in cGVHD. The key to successful cGVHD control and management includes a comprehensive and sustained multidisciplinary effort with emphasis on ancillary and supportive care for these patients. The focus of this review is to summarize the new developments in systemic, organ-specific, and topical treatments in the management of cGVHD that emerged since the 2014 NIH consensus conference.

[Management of patients developing acute gastro-intestinal graft-versus-host-disease: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the most common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with a frequency range of 30% to 50%. GVH is the leading cause of non-relapse-related deaths and a cause early mortality. Gastro-intestinal (GI) GVH results in digestive manifestations that involve the small intestine and the colon. The patient may then have diarrhea, intestinal bleeding, abdominal pain but also clinical signs such as nausea and vomiting may lead to anorexia. GI-GVHD promotes undernutrition as well as significant losses of vitamins and trace elements. In the case of post-transplant diarrhea, differential diagnosis can include GI-GVHD, infection and drug toxicity. Although, corticosteroids w/wo calcineurin inhibitors represent the standard of care in first line treatment, there is no consensus regarding salvage therapy in case of corticoresistant GI-GVH. In addition, assessment of early nutritional status would help combating undernutrition, which is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with GI-GVHD. In this workshop of the Fancophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) we focused on the management of patients developing GI-GVHD following allo-HCT.

The CoV-2 outbreak: how hematologists could help to fight Covid-19

COVID-19 is a medical emergency, with 20 % of patients presenting with severe clinical manifestations. From the pathogenetic point of view, COVID-19 mimics two other well-known diseases characterized by cytokine storm and hyper-activation of the immune response, with consequent organ damage: acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Hematologists are confident with these situations requiring a prompt therapeutic approach for switching off the uncontrolled cytokine release; here, we discuss pros and cons of drugs that are already employed in hematology in the light of their possible application in COVID-19. The most promising drugs might be: Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, with a rapid and powerful anti-cytokine effect, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with their good anti-inflammatory properties, and perhaps the anti-Cd26 antibody Begelomab. We also present immunological data from gene expression experiments where TKIs resulted effective anti-inflammatory and pro-immune drugs. A possible combined treatment algorithm for COVID-19 is here proposed.