Thrombose symptomatique sur cathéter veineux central de longue durée en oncologie : un score de risque prédictif?

Totally implanted venous access-associated adverse events in oncology: Results from a prospective 1-year surveillance programme

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, most studies on totally implanted venous access-associated adverse events (TIVA-AE) were conducted retrospectively and/or were based on a limited sample size. The aim of our survey was two-fold: to estimate the incidence of TIVA-AE and to identify risk factors in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data from our routine surveillance of TIVA-AE were collected prospectively between October 2009 and January 2011 in two oncology referral centers in Northern France. The open cohort under surveillance during the same time period was reconstituted retrospectively using data from the hospital information systems. Incidences of first TIVA-AE per 1000 TIVA-days were calculated. Risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

We included 2286 cancer patients, corresponding to 582,347 TIVA-days. Among the 133 first TIVA-AE observed (incidence 0.23 per 1000 TIVA-days [0.19-0.27]), there were 50 infectious AE (incidence 0.09 [0.06-0.11]) and 83 non-infectious AE (incidence 0.14 [0.11-0.17]). Compared to non-metastatic solid cancers, metastatic cancers (aOR=2.3 [0.9-6.0]), and hematologic malignancies (aOR=3.2 [1.1-8.8]) tended to be associated with a higher risk of infectious TIVA-AE (P=0.087). Solid cancer type was associated with non-infectious TIVA-AE (P=0.030), especially digestive cancers.

DISCUSSION

We report accurate estimations of TIVA-AE incidences in one of the largest populations among previously published studies. As in previous studies, metastatic cancers and hematologic malignancies tended to be associated with a higher risk of infectious TIVA-AE. Further studies are warranted to confirm the effect of digestive cancers.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of central venous catheter-related thromboembolism in breast cancer patients: the CAVECCAS study

Previous epidemiologic studies investigating central venous catheter (CVC)‐related venous thromboembolism (CRT) were conducted in heterogenous cancer populations and data in breast cancer (BC) remain limited. To investigate the Doppler ultrasound (DUS)‐CRT incidence, risk factors and outcomes in BC, we designed a prospective, multicenter cohort of nonmetastatic invasive BC patients undergoing insertion of a CVC for chemotherapy. All patients underwent double‐blind DUS before, 7, 30, and 90 days after CVC insertion and a 6 months clinical follow‐up. Symptomatic DUS‐CRT were treated by anticoagulants. D‐Dimers, thrombin generation, and platelet‐derived microparticles were measured before and 2 days after CVC placement. In DUS‐CRT patients, a nested case–control study analyzed the role of thrombophilia. Among 524 patients, the DUS‐CRT (14 symptomatic, 46 asymptomatic) cumulative probability was 9.6% at 3 months and 11.5% at 6 months (overall incidence rate: 2.18/100 patient‐months). Ten/14 symptomatic DUS‐CRT were detected on double‐blind DUS before the clinical symptoms, and 3/14 had a simultaneous pulmonary embolism. No clinical thrombotic event subsequently occurred in untreated asymptomatic DUS‐CRT. Age >50 years (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.01–3.22), BMI >30 kg/m² (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.46–4.76) and comorbidities (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.18–3.56) were associated with DUS‐CRT. No biomarkers was found to predict DUS‐CRT. In multivariate analysis, BMI >30 kg/m² (OR, 2.66; 95%CI, 1.46–4.84) and lobular carcinoma histology (OR, 2.56; 95%CI, 1.32–4.96) remained the only significant DUS‐CRT risk factors. Thrombophilia did not account for DUS‐CRT. Only clinical parameters identified high risk DUS‐CRT patients who may be considered for thromboprophylaxis.

Venous Thromboembolism in Children with Cancer and Blood Disorders

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is multifactorial and most often related to a combination of inherited and acquired thrombophilias. Children with cancer and blood disorders are often at risk for VTE due to disease-related factors such as inflammation and abnormal blood flow and treatment-related factors such as central venous catheters and surgery. We will review risk factors for VTE in children with leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumors. We will also review risk factors for VTE in children with blood disorders with specific focus on sickle cell anemia and hemophilia. We will present the available evidence and clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of VTE in these populations.

Large Cohort Study of Central Venous Catheter Thrombosis during Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy

The frequency and risk factors for central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) during prolonged intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy have rarely been reported. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency, incidence, and risk factors for CRT among patients being treated with prolonged i.v. antibiotic therapy. The secondary objective was to describe the clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and clinical management. This cohort study was conducted between August 2004 and May 2010 in a French referral center for osteoarticular infections. All patients treated for bone and joint infections with i.v. antimicrobial therapy through a central venous catheter (CVC) for ≥2 weeks were included. Risk factors were identified using nonparametric tests and logistic regression. A case-control study investigated the role of vancomycin and catheter malposition. A total of 892 patients matched the inclusion criteria. CRT developed in 16 infections occurring in 16 patients (incidence, 0.39/1,000 catheter days). The median time to a CRT was 29 days (range, 12 to 48 days). Local clinical signs, fever, and secondary complications of CRT were present in 15, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. The median C-reactive protein level was 95 mg/liter. The treatment combined catheter removal and a median of 3 months (1.5 to 6 months) of anticoagulation therapy. The outcome was good in all patients, with no recurrence of CRT. Three risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: male sex (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 26.6), catheter malposition (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 17.9), and use of vancomycin (OR, 22.9; 95% CI, 2.8 to 188). Catheter-related thrombosis is a rare but severe complication in patients treated with prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Vancomycin use was the most important risk factor identified.

Incidence of ultrasound-detected asymptomatic long-term central vein catheter-related thrombosis and fibrin sheath in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Most central venous catheter (CVC)-related deep vein thromboses (DVT) are asymptomatic and their incidence and clinical relevance are still under debate. Data on CVC-related fibrin sheaths are scarce. We investigated the incidence of asymptomatic DVT and fibrin sheaths in cancer patients with long-term CVC implantation who underwent Doppler ultrasound surveillance at 1, 6, and 12 months after implantation. Effects of low-weight molecular heparin (LWMH) therapy on DVT and fibrin sheaths were also analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed on a large cohort (n = 400) of patients with cancer aged >18 requiring long-term CVC implantation for chemotherapy infusion. CVC was implanted by a trained qualified staff, according to standardized protocol in a specific surgery. Patients underwent ultrasound examination at 1 and 6 months after CVC implantation to detect 'early' (1 month) and 'late' (6 months) asymptomatic DVT or fibrin sheaths incidence. Sixty-nine patients underwent US examination also 12 months after CVC implantation.

RESULTS

The incidence of CVC-related thrombosis was 0.10 events per 1000 catheter days. Anticoagulation therapy with LWMH resolved 50% of DVT, but no CVC needed removing. Incidence of new onset fibrin sheaths was 0.71 events per 1000 catheter days. Fibrin sheaths resolution occurred independently of LWMH therapy.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of asymptomatic DVT in our patients with long-term CVC is very low and does not represent per se an indication for removal of functioning CVC in patients with cancer. Fibrin sheaths are frequent (13%) and never associated with CVC dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic DVT and fibrin sheaths do not represent per se an indication for removal of functioning CVC in cancer patients who need central vein access.

Clinical guidelines on central venous catheterisation. Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Safe and reliable venous access is mandatory in modern health care, but central venous catheters (CVCs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, This paper describes current Swedish guidelines for clinical management of CVCs The guidelines supply updated recommendations that may be useful in other countries as well. Literature retrieval in the Cochrane and Pubmed databases, of papers written in English or Swedish and pertaining to CVC management, was done by members of a task force of the Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Consensus meetings were held throughout the review process to allow all parts of the guidelines to be embraced by all contributors. All of the content was carefully scored according to criteria by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We aimed at producing useful and reliable guidelines on bleeding diathesis, vascular approach, ultrasonic guidance, catheter tip positioning, prevention and management of associated trauma and infection, and specific training and follow-up. A structured patient history focused on bleeding should be taken prior to insertion of a CVCs. The right internal jugular vein should primarily be chosen for insertion of a wide-bore CVC. Catheter tip positioning in the right atrium or lower third of the superior caval vein should be verified for long-term use. Ultrasonic guidance should be used for catheterisation by the internal jugular or femoral veins and may also be used for insertion via the subclavian veins or the veins of the upper limb. The operator inserting a CVC should wear cap, mask, and sterile gown and gloves. For long-term intravenous access, tunnelled CVC or subcutaneous venous ports are preferred. Intravenous position of the catheter tip should be verified by clinical or radiological methods after insertion and before each use. Simulator-assisted training of CVC insertion should precede bedside training in patients. Units inserting and managing CVC should have quality assertion programmes for implementation and follow-up of routines, teaching, training and clinical outcome. Clinical guidelines on a wide range of relevant topics have been introduced, based on extensive literature retrieval, to facilitate effective and safe management of CVCs.

Early-onset Thrombosis of Internal Jugular Vein Associated with Introducer Catheter for Heart Catheterization in Cardiac Surgery

Purpose

In cardiac surgery, Swan-Ganz catheter (SGC) is often necessary and is inserted before the intervention through an introducer catheter. Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a frequent complication of this procedure and often remains subclinical. The aims of this prospective cohort study were to determinate the incidence of CRT after positioning an SGC through an introducer and to identify factors relating to their occurrence.

Methods

One-hundred and sixteen cardiac surgery patients underwent ultrasound examination of the thoracic-cervical vessels, before and after introducer catheter removal. Data about drugs infused through the introducer catheter were also collected.

Results

The incidence of internal jugular vein CRT was 26.7%, corresponding to 70.5 cases per 1,000 catheter days. The incidence of “fibrin sleeve” was 28.4%. All introducer catheter tips lay in the brachiocephalic vein or in the upper third of the superior vena cava. The incidence of CRT was not associated with duration of the placement of the introducer catheter (average 3.9±2 days) or the SGC (average of 2.4±1.7 days). Infusion of total parenteral nutrition and dextran showed a significantly increased risk of thrombosis in both univariate and multivariate analyses. An overly proximal position of the introducer catheter tip was strongly associated with CRT incidence.

Conclusions

The presence of an introducer catheter for SGC, even for a short time, is associated with a high incidence of early-onset CRT. This incidence is significantly related to the catheter tip being positioned in the brachiocephalic vein and to its use as a central venous access.

Subclavian central venous catheter-related thrombosis in trauma patients: incidence, risk factors and influence of polyurethane type

Introduction

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) related to a central venous catheter varies considerably in ICUs depending on the population included. The aim of this study was to determine subclavian central venous catheter (SCVC)-related DVT risk factors in severely traumatized patients with regard to two kinds of polyurethane catheters.

Methods

Critically ill trauma patients needing a SCVC for their usual care were prospectively included in an observational study. Depending on the month of inclusion, patients received one of the two available products in the emergency unit: either an aromatic polyurethane SCVC or an aliphatic polyurethane SCVC. Patients were screened weekly by ultrasound for SCVC-related DVT. Potential risk factors were collected, including history-related, trauma-related and SCVC-related characteristics.

Results

A total of 186 patients were included with a median Injury Severity Sore of 30 and a high rate of severe brain injuries (21% of high intracranial pressure). Incidence of SCVC-related DVT was 37% (95% confidence interval: 26 to 40) in patients or 20/1,000 catheter-days. SCVC-related DVT occurred within 8 days in 65% of cases. There was no significant difference in DVT rates between the aromatic polyurethane and aliphatic polyurethane SCVC groups (38% vs. 36%). SCVC-related DVT independent risk factors were age >30 years, intracranial hypertension, massive transfusion (>10 packed red blood cell units), SCVC tip position in the internal jugular or in the innominate vein, and ipsilateral jugular catheter.

Conclusion

SCVC-related DVT concerned one-third of these severely traumatized patients and was mostly clinically silent. Incidence did not depend on the type of polyurethane but was related to age >30 years, intracranial hypertension or misplacement of the SCVC. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine screening in these patients in whom thromboprophylaxis may be hazardous.

International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Although long-term indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) and loss of the CVC, there is lack of consensus on management of CVC-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients and heterogeneity in clinical practices worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To establish common international Good Clinical Practices Guidelines (GCPG) for the management of CRT in cancer patients.

METHODS

An international working group of experts was set up to develop GCPG according to an evidence-based medicine approach, using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

For the treatment of established CRT in cancer patients, we found no prospective randomized studies, two non-randomized prospective studies and one retrospective study examining the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) plus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). One retrospective study evaluated the benefit of CVC removal and two small retrospective studies were on thrombolytic drugs. For the treatment of symptomatic CRT, anticoagulant treatment (AC) is recommended for a minimum of 3 months; in this setting, LMWHs are suggested. VKAs can also be used, in the absence of direct comparisons of these two types of anticoagulants in this setting [Guidance]. The CVC can be kept in place if it is functional, well-positioned and non-infected and there is good resolution under close surveillance; whether the CVC is kept or removed, no standard approach in terms of AC duration has been established [Guidance]. For the prophylaxis of CRT in cancer patients, we found six randomized studies investigating the efficacy and safety of VKA vs. placebo or no treatment, one on the efficacy and safety of unfractionnated heparin, six on the value of LMWH, one double-blind randomized and one non randomized study on thrombolytic drugs and six meta-analyses of AC and CVC thromboprophylaxis. Type of catheter (open-ended like the Hickman(®) catheter vs. closed-ended catheter with a valve like the Groshong(®) catheter), its position (above, below or at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium) and method of placement may influence the onset of CRT on the basis of six retrospective trials, four prospective non-randomized trials, three randomized trials and one meta-analysis. In light of these data: use of AC for routine prophylaxis of CRT is not recommended [1A]; a CVC should be inserted on the right side, in the jugular vein, and distal extremity of the CVC should be located at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium [1A].

CONCLUSION

Dissemination and implementation of these international GCPG for the prevention and treatment of CRT in cancer patients at each national level is a major public health priority, needing worldwide collaboration.

Epidemiology and prevention of catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer

Central venous catheters are extensively used in patients with cancer to secure delivery of chemotherapy and facilitate phlebotomy. Unfortunately, considerable morbidity can result from early complications or late sequelae, ranging from arterial puncture, pneumothorax and bloodstream infections to catheter-related thrombosis (CRT). Contemporary studies have shown that the incidence of symptomatic CRT is ∼5%, whereas the incidence of asymptomatic CRT is higher, at 14-18%. The significance and mechanisms of catheter design, material, insertion location and technique, position of the catheter tip and other risk factors in contributing to the development of CRT are not well understood. Efforts to reduce thrombotic complications, involving flushing the catheter with heparinized solutions, the use of heparin-bonded catheters, and systemic anticoagulant prophylaxis, have been largely ineffective. More studies are needed to understand the pathophysiology of thrombotic complications, to help identify effective interventions to reduce this adverse outcome.

[Percutaneous implantable port-related infection and thrombosis: diagnostic and management]

Taking care of patients in oncology needs safety venous access, as percutaneous implantable port. These venous devices are sometimes responsible for serious adverse events. Infection and thrombosis are the two main complications that can occur early or be delayed. Clinical examination and especially, evaluation of the severity are very important keys to manage the patients. They both can lead to the ablation of the central venous device, which is an option to keep always in mind. However, whatever the clinical situation is, the oncologic context such as life expectancy and the need for a venous access is also a data to counterbalance.

2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group

BACKGROUND

In view of the lack of recommendations on central venous catheter (CVC)-associated thrombosis in cancer patients, we established guidelines according to the well-standardized Standards, Options and Recommendations methodology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature review (1990-2007) on CVC-associated thrombosis was carried out. The guidelines were developed on the basis of the corresponding levels of evidence derived from analysis of the 36 of 175 publications selected. They were then peer reviewed by 65 independent experts.

RESULTS

For the prevention of CVC-associated thrombosis, the distal tip of the CVC should be placed at the junction between the superior cava vein and right atrium; anticoagulants are not recommended. Treatment of CVC-associated thrombosis should be based on the prolonged use of low-molecular weight heparins. Maintenance of the catheter is justified if it is mandatory, functional, in the right position, and not infected, with a favorable clinical evolution under close monitoring; anticoagulant treatment should then be continued as long as the catheter is present.

CONCLUSIONS

Several rigorous studies do not support the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of CVC-associated thrombosis. Treatment of CVC-associated thrombosis relies on the same principles as those applied in the treatment of established thrombosis in cancer patients.

[Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients]

Increased incidence of cancers and the development of totally implanted venous access devices that contain their own port to deliver chemotherapy will lead to a greater than before numbers of central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CVCT). Medical consequences include catheter dysfunction and pulmonary embolism. Vessel injury caused by the procedure of CVC insertion is the most important risk factor for development of CVCT. This event could cause the formation of a fresh thrombus, which is reversible in the large majority of patients. In some cases, thrombus formation is not related to catheter insertion. The incidence of CVC-related DVT assessed by venography has been reported to vary from 30 to 60% but catheter-related DVT in adult patients is symptomatic in only 5% of cases. The majority of patients with CVC-related DVT is asymptomatic or has nonspecific symptoms: arm or neck swelling or pain, distal paresthesias, headache, congestion of subcutaneous collateral veins. In the case of clinical suspicion of CVC-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT), compressive ultrasonography (US), especially with doppler and color imaging, currently is first used to confirm the diagnosis. Consequently, contrast venography is reserved for clinical trials and difficult diagnostic situations. There is no consensus on the optimal management of patients with CVC-related DVT. Treatment of CVC-related VTE requires a five- to seven-day course of adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by oral anticoagulants. Long-term LMWH that has been shown to be more effective than oral anticoagulant in cancer patients with lower limb DVT, could be used in these patients. The efficacy and safety of pharmacologic prophylaxis for CVC related thrombosis is not established and the last recommendations suggest that clinicians not routinely use prophylaxis to try to prevent thrombosis related to long-term indwelling CVCs in cancer patients. Additional studies performed in high risk populations with appropriate dosage and timing will help to define which patients could benefit from prophylaxis.

Thromboses sur cathéter central chez le patient cancéreux

OBJECTIVES

Increased incidence of cancers and the development of totally implanted venous access devices that contain their own port to deliver chemotherapy will lead to a greater than before numbers of central venous catheter related thrombosis (CVCT). Medical consequences include catheter dysfunction and pulmonary embolism. Compared with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (3 d) and with non CVC associated thrombosis (5 d), CVCT is associated with an increased duration of hospitalisation (9 d). CVCT oftentimes leads to the need to replace such ports at an average cost of 4500 euros.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Vessel injury caused by the procedure of CVC insertion is the most important risk factor for development of CVCT. This event could cause the formation of a fresh thrombus, which is reversible in the large majority of patients. The incidence of CVC-related DVT assessed by venography has been reported to vary from 30 to 60% but catheter-related DVT in adult patients is symptomatic in only 5% of cases. The majority of patients with CVC-related DVT is asymptomatic or has non-specific symptoms: arm or neck swelling or pain, distal paresthesias, headache, congestion of subcutaneous collateral veins. In the case of clinical suspicion of CVC-related DVT, compressive ultrasonography (US), especially with Doppler and color imaging, currently is first used to confirm the diagnosis. The main criteria of color-Doppler US are visualization of mural thrombi or incompressibility of the veins. Consequently, contrast venography is reserved for clinical trials and difficult diagnostic situations. There is no consensus on the optimal management of patients with CVC-related DVT. Treatment of CVC-related VTE requires a 5- to 7-day course of adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin or LMWH followed by oral anticoagulants. Long-term LMWH that has been shown to be more effective than oral anticoagulant in cancer patients with lower limb DVT could be used in these patients. The optimal duration of oral anticoagulation treatment for CVC-related DVT is unknown, but patients with active cancer should be treated for at least 6 months or indefinitely.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

The efficacy and safety of pharmacologic prophylaxis for CVC related thrombosis is not established. Additional studies performed in high risk populations are needed to define if LMWH or oral anticoagulation is indicated in this clinical setting.

[Venous thromboembolism and cancer]

OBJECTIVES

The risk of venous thrombosis during cancer is largely increased especially in case of chemotherapy, surgery, advanced stage disease, coagulation abnormalities. Survival of patients with cancer experiencing venous thrombosis seems to be worse. Although thrombosis may be a presenting feature of occult malignancy, there are insufficient data to support a more extensive screening than comprehensive medical history, physical examination, routine laboratory tests and chest radiography.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Pathophysiology of venous thrombosis during cancer is unspecific: venous stasis, vessel wall damage, hypercoagulability). Other factors like platelet abnormalities or the direct responsibility of chemotherapy or hormonotherapy have recently been though to play a causative role. Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis usually requires at least 6 months of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy rather than oral anticoagulant. Inferior vena cava filters are not indicated. Primary prophylaxis of thrombosis during cancer could safely been achieved with low-molecular-weight heparin. Central venous catheters can be associated with thrombotic complications. Many risks factors have been identified: catheter's type, modalities of catheter's implantation, type of perfusion, bulky mediastinal mass... Prophylactic anticoagulation is not routinely recommended.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Knew oral anticoagulants could facilitate the treatment of venous thrombosis occurring during cancer in the next years.