Impact de la modification des prescriptions chez les sujets âgés hospitalisés en service de court séjour gériatrique en termes de coût

Providing information about medication changes upon discharge from a geriatric unit: the community healthcare professionals' point of view

INTRODUCTION

It is well known that polypharmacy is associated with adverse drug events. Accordingly, specialist geriatric units have to pay particular attention to the appropriateness of prescription and the withdrawal of potentially inappropriate medications. Even though community healthcare professionals are keen to received medication reconciliation results, the literature data show that the quality of communication between the hospital and the community needs to be improved.

OBJECTIVE

To assess community healthcare professionals' opinions about the receipt of medication reconciliation results when a patient is discharged from a specialist geriatric unit.

METHOD

We performed a qualitative study of general practitioners, community pharmacists and retirement home physicians recruited by phone in the Indre-et-Loire region of France. A grounded theory method was used to analyze interviews in multidisciplinary focus groups.

RESULTS

The 17 community healthcare professionals first explained why the receipt of medication reconciliation results was important to them: clarifying the course and outcomes of hospital stays and reducing the lack of dialogue with the hospital, so that the interviewees could provide the care expected of them. The interviewees also described mistrust of the hospital and uncertainty when the modifications were received; these two concepts accentuated each other over time. Lastly, they shared their opinions about the information provided by the hospital, which could improve patient safety and provide leverage for treatment changes but also constituted a burden.

PERSPECTIVES

Our participants provided novel feedback and insight, constituting the groundwork for an improved medication reconciliation form that could be evaluated in future research. Exploring hospital-based professionals' points of view might help to determine whether the requested changes in the medication reconciliation form are feasible and might provide a better understanding of community-to-hospital communication.

Persistence of Effect of Medication Review on Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions in Older Patients Following Hospital Discharge

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) can lead to adverse drug reactions and should be avoided whenever possible.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the PIP resumption rate 6 months after discharge from our geriatric unit and to compare it with data in the literature.

METHODS

This single-center observational study included patients aged ≥ 70 years with at least one PIP that had been stopped during hospitalization (according to Screening Tool for Older Persons Prescriptions [STOPP] and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment [START] criteria, version 2) between May 2018 and October 2018. We collected sociodemographic data, medication reconciliation data, and descriptive data during a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Each patient's medication history after discharge was determined in collaboration with their usual community pharmacist.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (females 70%, mean age 87.1 years) were included. Data for the admission and discharge medication reconciliations were available for 44 patients (35%). On admission, 121 of the 125 patients (97%) were taking cardiovascular medication. Of the 336 treatments withdrawn, 61 (18.2%) had been re-prescribed at 6 months post-discharge-including half within the first month. The most frequent STOPP criterion was lack of indication (32%), and the overall PIP resumption rate was 22%. According to the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification, the main organ system affected by PIPs was the cardiovascular system (47%, with a resumption rate of 17%).

CONCLUSION

Our results highlighted a low PIP resumption rate at 6 months and showed that a collaborative medication review is associated with persistent medium-term medication changes.

[Medication management of hypertension and heart failure in older patients: What happens to therapeutic changes after hospitalization?]

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to objectivize if the cardiovascular therapeutic changes performed during hospitalization of older patients with hypertension and/or heart failure (HF), were maintained in ambulatory 3 month after hospitalization.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal study conducted in a geriatric unit. Patients over 65 years with hypertension and/or HF, who had at least one change in cardiovascular medicaton during hospitalization, and who accepted the 3-month follow-up were included in the longitudinal study. At admission, during hospitalization and 3 months after hospitalization data concerning cardiovascular medication were collected.

RESULTS

During hospitalization, 142 (73.6%) patients had at least one change in hypertension and/or HF medication. Overall, 249 changes were performed. Forty-one patients received follow-up at 3 months. At 3 months, therapeutic changes were maintained by 48.8% of the general practitioners (n=20 patients). For the rest, 41.5% of the patients had benefited from new therapeutic changes (28 changes for 10 patients) and 9.7% of the general practitioners (n=4 patients) had restored the initial prescription before hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication review performed by geriatricians and pharmacists during hospitalization resulted in 249 changes. These changes aimed at limiting iatrogenic disease, by reducing overtreatment and potentially inappropriate prescriptions. Difficulties in the patient care continuity between the hospital and ambulatory setting have been identified.

[Assessment of medication prescribing in a geriatric follow-up care and rehabilitation]

The aim of the study was to analyse the prescriptions and identify the factors associated with inappropriate prescribing (IP) and polypharmacy. Polypharmacy and IP concerned 80% of the 54 patients included in the study upon admission, and 78% upon discharge without a statistically significant reduction. A critical analysis of prescriptions would help to reduce inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in elderly patients.