Chronic treatment with indacaterol and airway response to salbutamol in stable COPD

Residual reversibility in COPD patients already on long-acting bronchodilator: The OscilloRevers Study

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is a complex symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which is not strongly correlated with lung function measures. Long-acting bronchodilators (LAB) may reduce this dyspnea, but some patients report persistent chronic dyspnea despite this treatment. This study aims to assess residual reversibility and clinical response after short-acting bronchodilator (SAB) in COPD patients already treated by LAB and reporting persistent dyspnea.

METHODS

COPD patients with a persistent dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) ≥1) despite current stable treatment with at least one LAB were included. Spirometry, plethysmography and impulse oscillometry (IOS) were performed at peak effect of their LAB and repeat 45 min after the intake of two SAB (400 µg of salbutamol and 80 µg of ipratropium). Dyspnea improvement was assessed at 45 min after SAB through a comparative two-sided VAS (-100 mm for maximal improvement; +100 mm for maximal degradation).

RESULTS

Twenty-two COPD patients were analyzed, mainly men (59.1 %) with a mean age of 60.6 years and a median FEV1 of 54 % of predicted values. Fifty percent of patients reported a severe basal dyspnea (mMRC ≥2). After SAB, spirometric and plethysmographic measurements were statistically improved. For IOS measurement, reactance at 5 Hz (X5) and area of reactance (AX) were also improved. Fifty percent of patients reported a clinically relevant improvement of their resting dyspnea. However, no correlation was found between dyspnea improvement and functional measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty percent of COPD patients regularly treated with one or two LAB still report a relevant improvement of resting dyspnea after the adjunctive intake of double short-acting bronchodilators. Physiological mechanisms associated with this improvement remain to be determined.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02928744.

Formulation, Optimization and In Vitro Evaluation of Fast Disintegrating Tablets of Salbutamol Sulphate using a Combination of Superdisintegrant and Subliming Agent

AIM

The present research work was aimed to formulate fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs) of salbutamol sulphate (SBS) using a combination of superdisintegrant and subliming agent, optimize the formulation and evaluate the in vitro performance of the developed FDTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A formulation of SBS FDT was developed using a combination of superdisintegrant - crospovidone and subliming agent - ammonium bicarbonate (AB) in which formulation variables, namely levels of crospovidone and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC):Mannitol (MNTL) ratio were evaluated for their effects on the response variables - disintegration time, hardness, friability and wetting time of the resulting FDTs. By employing a central composite design (CCD) methodology, the FDTs were optimized to achieve optimum levels of the formulation factors.

RESULTS

The desired optimum condition was obtained at 7.82% crospovidone and 70% of 1.56:1 MCC: MNTL ratio while maintaining AB at 5% level for aesthetic reasons. Under the optimized conditions, the disintegration time, hardness, friability and wetting time were 14.57±0.53 sec, 7.17±0.82 kg/cm2, 0.311% and 13.14±0.69 sec, respectively. The experimentally observed responses were found to be in close agreement with the predicted values for the optimized formulation. Moreover, the validity of the obtained optimal point was confirmed by the low magnitude of percent prediction error (<5%).

CONCLUSION

FDTs of SBS were successfully formulated and optimized using CCD employing a combination of superdisintegrant and subliming agents.

Management of COPD exacerbations: pharmacotherapeutics of medications

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is widely established as a health challenge, with predictions that it will be the third leading cause of global mortality and reduced health status within the next 10 years. Exacerbations of COPD are now the second largest cause of emergency hospitalisation in the UK. The respiratory clinical nurse specialist has an active role in the acute management of COPD exacerbations in the hospital setting, and it is essential that prescribing decisions are made based on the best available evidence. This article critically evaluates the pharmacotherapeutics and evidence base for the use of two medications, salbutamol and amoxicillin, in treating unstable COPD, and discusses implications for clinical practice.

Long-acting dual bronchodilator therapy (indacaterol/glycopyrronium) versus nebulized short-acting dual bronchodilator (salbutamol/ipratropium) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Most guidelines recommend long-acting bronchodilators over short-acting bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The available evidence for the guidelines was based on dry powder or pressurized metered dose inhalers, but not nebulizations. Nevertheless, there is considerable, poorly evidenced based, use of short acting nebulized bronchodilators.

METHODS

This was an investigator initiated, randomized, active controlled, cross-over, double-blind and double-dummy single centre study in patients with stable COPD. The active comparators were indacaterol/glycopyrronium 110/50 μg as Ultibro® via Breezhaler® (IND/GLY) and salbutamol/ipratropium 2,5/0,5 mg via air driven nebulization (SAL/IPR), both given as a single dose on separate days. The primary end point was the area under the FEV₁ curve from baseline till 6 h. Secondary end points included change in Borg dyspnoea score, adverse events and change in hyperinflation measured by the inspiratory capacity.

RESULTS

A total of 33 COPD patients completed the trial and were evaluable, most of them were ex-smokers. The difference between the tested regimens for the primary endpoint, FEV₁ AUC 0-6 h, 2965 ± 1544 mL (mean ± SD) for IND/GLY versus 3513 ± 1762 mL for SAL/IPR, was not significant (P = 0.08). The peak in FEV1 was higher and was reached faster with SAL/IPR compared to IND/GLY. No other significant differences were detected for the secondary endpoints including the Borg score, or adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with stable COPD, dry powder long-acting single inhalation of a LABA and a LAMA (IND/GLY) was not superior compared to nebulized short-acting salbutamol plus ipratropium (SAL/IPR) in its bronchodilating effects over 6 h.The effects of the nebulization kicked in faster and peaked higher. The observed differences may be caused by the difference in dosing between the two regimens. The improvement in Borg dyspnoea score did not favour the nebulization. Long-term outcomes were not assessed in this study.

Change in Inhaler Use, Lung Function, and Oxygenation in Association with Symptoms in COPD

Despite clinical guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients to self-treat worsening respiratory symptoms with supplemental inhaler/nebulizer use, few studies have investigated if symptom changes are associated with differences in oxygenation, lung function, or self-treatment. A total of 26 former smokers (mean age 72.7 ±7.5 years; 57.7% female) with COPD (≥ Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage 2) were followed for up to 4 months, during which they recorded daily oxygenation, lung function, and inhaler/nebulizer use. Differences in these health measures were assessed in association with self-reported worsening symptoms and COPD exacerbations, as defined by validated questionnaire. We collected 2451 observations with spirometry and questionnaire data and identified 253 symptom days (10.3%) and 47 (1.92%) exacerbation days. In linear mixed effects models adjusted for age, sex, race, height, weight, and season, each respiratory symptom reported worse than baseline was associated with a 0.19 percentage point (95% CI -0.31 to -0.07) lower daily oxygen saturation (p=0.002). On major symptom days (defined as worse-than-baseline dyspnea, sputum purulence or sputum amount), oxygen saturation was 0.56 percentage points lower (95% CI -0.89 to -0.23, p=0.001) than days without increased major symptoms. We found no association of symptom days or exacerbations with forced expiratory volume in 1 second. There were 8 reports of increased inhaler/nebulizer use from baseline on symptom days (1.5% of 253). In this moderate-to-severe COPD population, worsening respiratory symptoms were common and associated with lower oxygenation. However, participants did not self-treat symptoms with increased inhaler/nebulizer use, which may suggest poor perceived clinical benefit from short-acting bronchodilators and a potential target for patient education.

Effects of chronic treatment with the new ultra-long-acting β2 -adrenoceptor agonist indacaterol alone or in combination with the β1 -adrenoceptor blocker metoprolol on cardiac remodelling

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The ability of a chronic treatment with indacaterol, a new ultra-long-acting β2 -adrenoceptor agonist, to reverse cardiac remodelling and its effects in combination with metoprolol, a selective β1 -adrenoceptor antagonist, were investigated on myocardial infarction in a rat model of heart failure (HF).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We investigated the effects of indacaterol and metoprolol, administered alone or in combination, on myocardial histology, β-adrenoceptor-mediated pathways, markers of remodelling and haemodynamic parameters in a rat model of HF. Five groups of rats were assessed: sham-operated rats; HF rats; HF + indacaterol 0.3 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) ; HF + metoprolol 100 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) ; HF + metoprolol + indacaterol. All pharmacological treatments continued for 15 weeks.

KEY RESULTS

Treatment with either indacaterol or metoprolol significantly reduced the infarct size in HF rats. However, the combination of indacaterol and metoprolol reduced the infarct size even further, reduced both BP and heart rate, reversed the decrease in ejection fraction, normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic internal diameters, normalized the decreased β1 adrenoceptor mRNA expression as well as cardiac cAMP levels and reduced cardiac GPCR kinase 2 expression, compared with the untreated HF group.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The results of our study demonstrated an additive interaction between indacaterol and metoprolol in normalizing and reversing cardiac remodelling in our experimental model of HF. The translation of these findings to clinical practice might be of interest, as this combination of drugs could be safer and more effective in patients suffering from HF and COPD.

Indacaterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

The need for a rapid onset of action and a long duration of the broncholytic effect is the likely reason for the development of new long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) that are fast acting and have true 24 h duration of action. Indacaterol is the archetype of once-daily LABAs and already marketed as a maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AREAS COVERED

Meta-analyses of published data or pooled analyses of primary data provide good insight into the clinical role of indacaterol in COPD.

EXPERT OPINION

The choice of the once-daily bronchodilator to start treatment in a patient with COPD mainly depends on the outcome of interest. Indacaterol is more effective than tiotropium if we consider symptoms or health-related quality of life as the primary outcome. Moreover, in symptomatic patient indacaterol should be preferred to tiotropium because of its rapid onset of action. By contrast, tiotropium appears to be more effective than indacaterol if exacerbations are the expected primary outcome. However, as indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination (QVA149) shows superior efficacy compared to glycopyrronium and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD, a fundamental question regarding the use of indacaterol that requires clarification is whether it is preferable to start immediately with QVA149 rather than using indacaterol alone.

Prediction of disease progression, treatment response and dropout in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Purpose

Drug development in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been characterised by unacceptably high failure rates. In addition to the poor sensitivity in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), numerous causes are known to contribute to this phenomenon, which can be clustered into drug-, disease- and design-related factors. Here we present a model-based approach to describe disease progression, treatment response and dropout in clinical trials with COPD patients.

Methods

Data from six phase II trials lasting up to 6 months were used. Disease progression (trough FEV₁ measurements) was modelled by a time–varying function, whilst the treatment effect was described by an indirect response model. A time-to-event model was used for dropout

Results

All relevant parameters were characterised with acceptable precision. Two parameters were necessary to model the dropout patterns, which was found to be partly linked to the treatment failure. Disease severity at baseline, previous use of corticosteroids, gender and height were significant covariates on disease baseline whereas disease severity and reversibility to salbutamol/salmeterol were significant covariates on E_max for salmeterol active arm.

Conclusion

Incorporation of the various interacting factors into a single model will offer the basis for patient enrichment and improved dose rationale in COPD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11095-014-1490-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of indacaterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Indacaterol is the first long-acting β2-agonist (LABAs) approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that allows for once-daily (OD) administration. It is rapidly acting, with an onset of action in 5 minutes, like salbutamol and formoterol but with a sustained bronchodilator effect, that last for 24 hours, like tiotropium. In long-term clinical studies (12 weeks to 1 year) in patients with moderate to severe COPD, OD indacaterol 150 or 300 μg improved lung function (primary endpoint) significantly more than placebo, and improvements were significantly greater than twice-daily formoterol 12 μg or salmeterol 50 μg, and noninferior to OD tiotropium bromide 18 μg. Indacaterol was well tolerated at all doses and with a good overall safety profile. Cost-utility analyses show that indacaterol 150 μg has lower total costs and better outcomes than tiotropium and salmeterol. These findings suggest that indacaterol can be considered a first choice drug in the treatment of the patient with mild/moderate stable COPD. However, in people with COPD who remain symptomatic on treatment with indacaterol, adding a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is the preferable option. In any case, it is advisable to combine indacaterol with a OD inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), such as mometasone furoate or ciclesonide, in patients with low FEV1, and, in those patients who have many symptoms and a high risk of exacerbations, to combine it with a LAMA and a OD ICS.