Nebulized Ipratropium bromide protects against tracheal and bronchial secretion during bronchoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic administration prior to flexible bronchoscopy has been investigated, but studies have not yielded consistent results.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nebulized 4 ml ipratropium bromide (1 mg, n = 125) or placebo (n = 125) for 15 minutes as premedication, 20 to 40 minutes before bronchoscopy. Airway secretions, bleeding, patient discomfort, procedure time, and procedure-related adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Nebulized ipratropium bromide prior to bronchoscopy could reduce airway secretions and patient discomfort (P = .02; P < .001, respectively), but not tracheobronchial bleeding or procedure time (P = .51, P = .36, respectively). Chest nodule or mass was the most common indication for performing bronchoscopy. The adverse events were higher in ipratropium bromide group, and hypertension was the most common complication.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized ipratropium bromide prior to bronchoscopy is a more effective regimen that shows a practical benefit on the airway secretions and patient comfort, though these effects may not translate into any marked reduction in bleeding or of procedure time under general anesthesia. We suggest that routine nebulized ipratropium bromide premedication for bronchoscopy could be useful and beneficial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR1800016881.

Reduced Environmental Impact of the Reusable Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler Compared with Pressurised Metered-Dose Inhalers

INTRODUCTION

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) are associated with global warming potential values as they contain a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant, whereas the Respimat^® Soft Mist™ inhaler is propellant-free. The original disposable Respimat has recently been updated to provide a reusable device that is similar in performance and use but is more convenient to patients and reduces environmental impact. This study compared the product carbon footprint (PCF) of Respimat (both disposable and reusable) and pMDIs to understand life cycle hotspots, and also to determine the potential quantitative environmental benefits of a reusable Respimat product.

METHODS

PCFs of four inhalation products-tiotropium bromide (Spiriva^®) Respimat, ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (Berodual^®) Respimat, Berodual HFA pMDI and ipratropium bromide (Atrovent^®) HFA pMDI-were assessed across their whole life cycle.

RESULTS

Data show that Respimat inhalers have a lower PCF (carbon dioxide equivalent per kilogram) than HFA pMDIs: pMDI Atrovent 14.59; pMDI Berodual 16.48; disposable Spiriva Respimat 0.78; disposable Berodual Respimat 0.78. Approximately 98% of the pMDI life cycle total is due to HFA propellant emissions during use and end-of-life phases. The impact of the material used for the Respimat product outweighs the impact of the material used to make the empty cartridge. Furthermore, compared with the single-use device over 1 month, the PCF of Spiriva Respimat was further reduced by 57% and 71% using the device with refill cartridges over 3 and 6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Together, these data suggest that Respimat inhalers, and in particular the new reusable inhaler, can reduce the environmental impact associated with inhaler use.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim.

A mesh nebulizer is more effective than jet nebulizer to nebulize bronchodilators during non-invasive ventilation of subjects with COPD: A randomized controlled trial with radiolabeled aerosols

BACKGROUND

Beneficial effects from non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute COPD are well-established, but the impact of nebulization during NIV has not been well described.

AIM

To compare pulmonary deposition and distribution across regions of interest with administration of radiolabeled aerosols generated by vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) and jet nebulizer (JN) during NIV.

METHODS

A crossover single dose study involving 9 stable subjects with moderate to severe COPD randomly allocated to receive aerosol administration by the VMN Aerogen and the MistyNeb jet nebulizer operating with oxygen at 8 lpm during NIV. Radiolabeled bronchodilators (fill volume of 3 mL: 0.5 mL salbutamol 2.5 mg + 0.125 mL ipratropium 0.25 mg and physiologic saline up to 3 mL) were delivered until sputtering during NIV (pressures of 12 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O - inspiratory and expiratory, respectively) using an oro-nasal facemask. Radioactivity counts were performed using a gamma camera and regions of interest (ROIs) were delimited. Aerosol mass balance based on counts from the lungs, upper airways, stomach, nebulizer, circuit, inspiratory and expiratory filters, and mask were determined and expressed as a percentage of the total.

RESULTS

Both inhaled and lung doses were greater with VMN (22.78 ± 3.38% and 12.05 ± 2.96%, respectively) than JN (12.51 ± 6.31% and 3.14 ± 1.71%; p = 0.008). Residual drug volume was lower in VMN than in JN (3.08 ± 1.3% versus 46.44 ± 5.83%, p = 0.001). Peripheral deposition of radioaerosol was significantly lower with JN than VMN.

CONCLUSIONS

VMN deposited > 3 fold more radioaerosol into the lungs of moderate to severe COPD patients than JN during NIV.

Short-acting bronchodilators for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the hospital setting: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a lack of guidelines for the use of short-acting bronchodilators (SABD) in people admitted to hospital for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), despite routine use in practice and risk of cardiac adverse events.

AIM

To review the evidence that underpins use and optimal dose, in terms of risk versus benefit, of SABD for inpatient management of AECOPD and collate the results for future guidelines.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched (inception to November 2017) for published and ongoing studies. Included studies were randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of SABD (β2-agonist and/or ipratropium) on inpatients with a diagnosis of AECOPD. This review was undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a pre-defined protocol. Due to heterogeneous methodologies, meta-analysis was not possible so the results were synthesised qualitatively.

RESULTS

Of 1378 studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis of 10 studies revealed no significant differences in most outcomes of interest relative to dose, delivery via inhaler or nebuliser, and type of β2-agonist used. However, some evidence demonstrated significantly increased cardiac side effects with increased dosage of β2-agonist (45% versus 24%), P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

This review identified a paucity of methodologically rigorous evidence evaluating use of SABD among AECOPD. The available evidence did not identify any additional benefits for participants receiving higher doses of short-acting β2-agonists compared to lower doses, or based on type of delivery method or β2-agonists used. However, there was a small increase in some adverse events for participants using higher doses of β2-agonists.

Paradoxical Vocal Cord Motion in a Pair of Twin Preterm Infants

BACKGROUND

Intractable obstructive apneas requiring multiple intubations are rare in newborns.

CASE CHARACTERISTICS

We report a pair of twins born at 29 weeks gestation who had severe obstructive apneas due to Paradoxical Vocal Cord Motion (PVCM).

OUTCOME

The symptoms resolved promptly with ipratropium nebulization. Follow-up at 12 months of age revealed normal development.

MESSAGE

PVCM should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intractable obstructive apneas in very low birth weight preterm infants.

Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma exacerbations can be frequent and range in severity from mild to life-threatening. The use of magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) is one of numerous treatment options available during acute exacerbations. While the efficacy of intravenous MgSO₄ has been demonstrated, the role of inhaled MgSO₄ is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled MgSO₄ administered in acute asthma.

SPECIFIC AIMS

to quantify the effects of inhaled MgSO₄ I) in addition to combination treatment with inhaled β₂-agonist and ipratropium bromide; ii) in addition to inhaled β₂-agonist; and iii) in comparison to inhaled β₂-agonist.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials and online trials registries in September 2017. We supplemented these with searches of the reference lists of published studies and by contact with trialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs including adults or children with acute asthma were eligible for inclusion in the review. We included studies if patients were treated with nebulised MgSO₄ alone or in combination with β₂-agonist or ipratropium bromide or both, and were compared with the same co-intervention alone or inactive control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial selection, data extraction and risk of bias. We made efforts to collect missing data from authors. We present results, with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for pulmonary function, clinical severity scores and vital signs; and risk ratios (RRs) for hospital admission. We used risk differences (RDs) to analyse adverse events because events were rare.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five trials (43 references) of varying methodological quality were eligible; they included 2907 randomised patients (2777 patients completed). Nine of the 25 included studies involved adults; four included adult and paediatric patients; eight studies enrolled paediatric patients; and in the remaining four studies the age of participants was not stated. The design, definitions, intervention and outcomes were different in all 25 studies; this heterogeneity made direct comparisons difficult. The quality of the evidence presented ranged from high to very low, with most outcomes graded as low or very low. This was largely due to concerns about the methodological quality of the included studies and imprecision in the pooled effect estimates. Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β₂-agonist and ipratropiumWe included seven studies in this comparison. Although some individual studies reported improvement in lung function indices favouring the intervention group, results were inconsistent overall and the largest study reporting this outcome found no between-group difference at 60 minutes (MD -0.3 % predicted peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), 95% CI -2.71% to 2.11%). Admissions to hospital at initial presentation may be reduced by the addition of inhaled magnesium sulfate (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; participants = 1308; studies = 4; I² = 52%) but no difference was detected for re-admissions or escalation of care to ITU/HDU. Serious adverse events during admission were rare. There was no difference between groups for all adverse events during admission (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.05; participants = 1197; studies = 2). Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β₂-agonistWe included 13 studies in this comparison. Although some individual studies reported improvement in lung function indices favouring the intervention group, none of the pooled results showed a conclusive benefit as measured by FEV1 or PEFR. Pooled results for hospital admission showed a point estimate that favoured the combination of MgSO₄ and β₂-agonist, but the confidence interval includes the possibility of admissions increasing in the intervention group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.15; participants = 375; studies = 6; I² = 0%). There were no serious adverse events reported by any of the included studies and no between-group difference for all adverse events (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03; participants = 694; studies = 5). Inhaled magnesium sulfate versus inhaled β₂-agonistWe included four studies in this comparison. The evidence for the efficacy of β₂-agonists in acute asthma is well-established and therefore this could be considered a historical comparison. Two studies reported a benefit of β₂-agonist over MgSO₄ alone for PEFR and two studies reported no difference; we did not pool these results. Admissions to hospital were only reported by one small study and events were rare, leading to an uncertain result. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the studies in this comparison; one small study reported mild to moderate adverse events but the result is imprecise.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with nebulised MgSO₄ may result in modest additional benefits for lung function and hospital admission when added to inhaled β₂-agonists and ipratropium bromide, but our confidence in the evidence is low and there remains substantial uncertainty. The recent large, well-designed trials have generally not demonstrated clinically important benefits. Nebulised MgSO₄ does not appear to be associated with an increase in serious adverse events. Individual studies suggest that those with more severe attacks and attacks of shorter duration may experience a greater benefit but further research into subgroups is warranted.Despite including 24 trials in this review update we were unable to pool data for all outcomes of interest and this has limited the strength of the conclusions reached. A core outcomes set for studies in acute asthma is needed. This is particularly important in paediatric studies where measuring lung function at the time of an exacerbation may not be possible. Placebo-controlled trials in patients not responding to standard maximal treatment, including inhaled β₂-agonists and ipratropium bromide and systemic steroids, may help establish if nebulised MgSO₄ has a role in acute asthma. However, the accumulating evidence suggests that a substantial benefit may be unlikely.

An overlooked Rx for nasal obstruction relief

We frequently recommend ipratropium nasal spray in our office, as it is an effective, non-addictive nasal decongestant.

[Effectiveness of inhaled hypertonic saline in children with bronchiolitis]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) solution in infants with acute bronchiolitis.

METHOD

Totally 129 patients with acute bronchiolitis (clinical severity score ≥ 4, aged 2-18 months) admitted to the Capital Institute of Pediatrics from November 2012 to January 2013 were enrolled. All the subjects were assigned to receive 1.5 ml compound ipratropium bromide solution for inhalation and 1 ml budesonide firstly, twice a day. Then, the subjects were randomized to receive 2 ml doses of nebulized 5% HS (Group A), 3% HS (Group B) or 0.9% NS (Group C), twice a day. The treatment lasted for 3 days. Clinical severity scores before treatment and 24, 48, 72 h after treatment were documented. Bronchospasm, nausea and emesis were recorded to assess safety.

RESULT

A total of 124 patients completed this research.Group A included 40 cases, Group B included 42 cases, Group C included 42 cases. Demographic characteristics, pre-treatment duration and clinical severity score before treatment were similar among the 3 group.Seventy-two hours after treatment, the clinical severity score of Group A, B, and C were 3.5 (1.0) , 4.0 (1.0) and 5.0 (0) . At 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment, the clinical severity score were significantly different among the three groups (χ(2) = 36.000, 51.200, 50.800, P < 0.05) .One patient in Group A got paroxysmal cough everytime as soon as he received 5% HS (6 times).Other 3 patients in Group A got paroxysmal cough once. The incidence of adverse effect of Group A was 3.75% (9/240); no adverse event occurred in other group. The incidence of adverse effect among this three group was significantly different (χ(2) = 19.13, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Inhalation of nebulized 5% and 3% hypertonic saline could decrease clinical symptoms of patient with acute bronchiolitis; 5% HS was superior to 3% HS. But 2 ml dose of 5% HS may induce paroxysmal cough.

Inhaled anticholinergics and short-acting beta(2)-agonists versus short-acting beta2-agonists alone for children with acute asthma in hospital

BACKGROUND

Inhaled anticholinergics given in addition to β2-agonists are effective in reducing hospital admissions in children presenting to the emergency department with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. It seems logical to assume a similar beneficial effect in children hospitalised for an acute asthma exacerbation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of anticholinergics added to β2-agonists as inhaled or nebulised therapy in children hospitalised for an acute asthma exacerbation. To investigate the characteristics of patients or therapy, if any, that would influence the magnitude of response attributable to the addition of anticholinergics.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR), which is derived through systematic searches of bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO and through handsearching of respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. The search is current to November 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing the combination of inhaled or nebulised anticholinergics and short-acting β2-agonists versus short-acting β2-agonists alone in children one to 18 years of age hospitalised for an acute asthma exacerbation were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality of trials and extracted data; disagreement was resolved by consensus or with the input of a third review author, when needed. Primary outcomes were duration of hospital stay and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included admission and duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), ventilation assistance, time to short-acting β2-agonists spaced at four hours or longer, supplemental asthma therapy, duration of supplemental oxygen, change from baseline in asthma severity, relapse after discharge, adverse health effects and withdrawals.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised trials were included, four of which reported usable data on 472 children with asthma one to 18 years of age who were admitted to paediatric wards. No trials included patients admitted to the ICU. The anticholinergic used, ipratropium bromide 250 μg, was given every one to eight hours over a period from four hours to the entire length of the hospital stay. Two of four trials (50%) contributing data were deemed of high methodological quality. The addition of anticholinergics to β2-agonists showed no evidence of effect on the duration of hospital admission (mean difference (MD) -0.28 hours, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.07 to 4.52, 3 studies, 327 participants, moderate quality evidence) and no serious or non-serious adverse events were reported in any included trials. As a result of the similarity of trials, we could not explore the influence of age, admission site, intensity of anticholinergic treatment and co-interventions on primary outcomes. No statistically significant group difference was noted in other secondary outcomes, including the need for supplemental asthma therapy, time to short-acting β2-agonists spaced at four hours or longer, asthma clinical scores, lung function and overall withdrawals for any reason.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In children hospitalised for an acute asthma exacerbation, no evidence of benefit for length of hospital stay and other markers of response to therapy was noted when nebulised anticholinergics were added to short-acting β2-agonists. No adverse health effects were reported, yet the small number of trials combined with inadequate reporting prevent firm reassurance regarding the safety of anticholinergics. In the absence of trials conducted in ICUs, no conclusion can be drawn regarding children with impending respiratory failure. These findings support current national and international recommendations indicating that healthcare practitioners should refrain from using anticholinergics in children hospitalised for acute asthma.

Combined inhaled anticholinergics and short-acting beta2-agonists for initial treatment of acute asthma in children

BACKGROUND

There are several treatment options for managing acute asthma exacerbations (sustained worsening of symptoms that do not subside with regular treatment and require a change in management). Guidelines advocate the use of inhaled short acting beta2-agonists (SABAs) in children experiencing an asthma exacerbation. Anticholinergic agents, such as ipratropium bromide and atropine sulfate, have a slower onset of action and weaker bronchodilating effect, but may specifically relieve cholinergic bronchomotor tone and decrease mucosal edema and secretions. Therefore, the combination of inhaled anticholinergics with SABAs may yield enhanced and prolonged bronchodilation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the addition of inhaled anticholinergics to SABAs provides clinical improvement and affects the incidence of adverse effects in children with acute asthma exacerbations.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to April 2000), EMBASE (1980 to April 2000), CINAHL (1982 to April 2000) and reference lists of studies of previous versions of this review. We also contacted drug manufacturers and trialists. For the 2012 review update, we undertook an 'all years' search of the Cochrane Airways Group's register on the 18 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized parallel trials comparing the combination of inhaled anticholinergics and SABAs with SABAs alone in children (aged 18 months to 18 years) with an acute asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used the GRADE rating system to assess the quality of evidence for our primary outcome (hospital admission).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty trials met the review eligibility criteria, generated 24 study comparisons and comprised 2697 randomised children aged one to 18 years, presenting predominantly with moderate or severe exacerbations. Most studies involved both preschool-aged children and school-aged children; three studies also included a small proportion of infants less than 18 months of age. Nine trials (45%) were at a low risk of bias. Most trials used a fixed-dose protocol of three doses of 250 mcg or two doses of 500 mcg of nebulized ipratropium bromide in combination with a SABA over 30 to 90 minutes while three trials used a single dose and two used a flexible-dose protocol according to the need for SABA.The addition of an anticholinergic to a SABA significantly reduced the risk of hospital admission (risk ratio (RR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.85; 15 studies, 2497 children, high-quality evidence). In the group receiving only SABAs, 23 out of 100 children with acute asthma were admitted to hospital compared with 17 (95% CI 15 to 20) out of 100 children treated with SABAs plus anticholinergics. This represents an overall number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 16 (95% CI 12 to 29).Trends towards a greater effect with increased treatment intensity and with increased asthma severity were observed, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no effect modification due to concomitant use of oral corticosteroids and the effect of age could not be explored. However, exclusion of the one trial that included infants (< 18 months) and contributed data to the main outcome, did not affect the results. Statistically significant group differences favoring anticholinergic use were observed for lung function, clinical score at 120 minutes, oxygen saturation at 60 minutes, and the need for repeat use of bronchodilators prior to discharge from the emergency department. No significant group difference was seen in relapse rates.Fewer children treated with anticholinergics plus SABA reported nausea and tremor compared with SABA alone; no significant group difference was observed for vomiting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Children with an asthma exacerbation experience a lower risk of admission to hospital if they are treated with the combination of inhaled SABAs plus anticholinergic versus SABA alone. They also experience a greater improvement in lung function and less risk of nausea and tremor. Within this group, the findings suggested, but did not prove, the possibility of an effect modification, where intensity of anticholinergic treatment and asthma severity, could be associated with greater benefit.Further research is required to identify the characteristics of children that may benefit from anticholinergic use (e.g. age and asthma severity including mild exacerbation and impending respiratory failure) and the treatment modalities (dose, intensity, and duration) associated with most benefit from anticholinergic use better.

Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma exacerbations can be frequent and range in severity from relatively mild to status asthmaticus. The use of magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) is one of numerous treatment options available during acute exacerbations. While the efficacy of intravenous MgSO(4) has been demonstrated, little is known of the role of inhaled MgSO(4).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of inhaled MgSO(4) administered in acute asthma on pulmonary functions and admission rates.

SPECIFIC AIMS

To quantify the effects of inhaled MgSO(4) i) in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonist, ii) in comparison to inhaled β(2)-agonist alone or iii) in addition to combination treatment with inhaled β(2) -agonist and ipratropium bromide.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials in September 2012. These trials were supplemented with trials found in the reference list of published studies, studies found using extensive electronic search techniques, as well as a review of the grey literature and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised (or pseudo-randomised) controlled trials including adults or children with acute asthma were eligible for inclusion in the review. Studies were included if patients were treated with nebulised MgSO(4) alone or in combination with β(2)-agonist and/or ipratropium bromide and were compared with β(2)-agonist alone or inactive control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by two review authors. Efforts were made to collect missing data from authors. Results are presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) for pulmonary function and risk ratios (RR) for hospital admission; both are displayed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (21 references) of unclear and high risk of bias were eligible and included 896 patients who were randomised (838 patients completed). Seven of the 16 included studies involved adults exclusively, three included adults and paediatric patients, four studies enrolled paediatric patients and in the remaining two studies the age of participants was not stated.The design, definitions, intervention and outcomes were different in all 16 studies; this heterogeneity made direct comparisons difficult (see additional tables 1-3).The overall risk of bias among the included studies was variable and this is reflected in the 'Summary of findings' table with most outcomes being judged as only moderate or less.Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonistThere was no statistically significant improvement in pulmonary function when inhaled MgSO(4) and β(2)-agonist was compared with β(2)-agonist alone (SMD 0.23; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.74; three studies, n = 188); however, there was considerable between study heterogeneity. There was no clear advantage in terms of hospital admissions (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.49, 1.16; four studies, n = 249), and there were no serious adverse events reported.Inhaled magnesium sulfate versus inhaled β(2)-agonistThe results of pulmonary function in three studies that compared inhaled MgSO(4) versus β(2)-agonist were too heterogeneous to combine; however, two of the studies found poorer lung function on MgSO(4). There was no significant difference in terms of hospital admissions in a single small study when MgSO(4) was compared to β(2)-agonist (RR 0.53 95% CI 0.05, 5.31; one study, n = 33), and there were no serious adverse events reported.Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonist and ipratropiumA further comparison has been included in the 2012 update of this review of MgSO(4) given in addition to inhaled ipratropium and β(2)-agonist therapy (as recommended by the GINA guidelines). However, there is not yet enough data for this outcome to come to any definite conclusions, but both small studies in adults with severe asthma exacerbation found improvements in pulmonary function with additional inhaled MgSO(4).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no good evidence that inhaled MgSO(4) can be used as a substitute for inhaled β(2)-agonists. When used in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonists (with or without inhaled ipratropium), there is currently no overall clear evidence of improved pulmonary function or reduced hospital admissions. However, individual study results from three trials suggest possible improved pulmonary function in those with severe asthma exacerbations (FEV1 less than 50% predicted). Heterogeneity among trials included in this review precludes a more definitive conclusion. Further studies should focus on inhaled MgSO(4) in addition to the current guideline treatment for acute asthma (inhaled β(2) -agonist and ipratropium bromide). As the evidence suggests that the most effective role of nebulised MgSO(4) may be in those with severe acute features and this is where future research should be focused. A set of core outcomes needs to be agreed upon both in adult and paediatric studies to allow improved study comparison in future. 

Addition of intravenous beta(2)-agonists to inhaled beta(2)-agonists for acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beta-agonist therapy is central to the management of acute asthma. This review evaluates the benefit of an additional use of intravenous beta(2)-agonist agents.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit of adding intravenous (IV) beta(2)-agonists to inhaled beta(2)-agonist therapy for acute asthma treated in the emergency department.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL as well as handsearching of 20 respiratory journals. Bibliographies from included studies and known reviews were also searched. Primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. The search was performed in September 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only RCTs were considered for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented to the emergency department with acute asthma and were treated with IV beta(2)-agonists with inhaled beta(2)-agonist therapy and existing standard treatments versus inhaled beta(2)-agonists and existing standard treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and confirmed their findings with corresponding authors of trials. We obtained missing data from authors or calculated from data present in the papers. We used fixed-effect model for odds ratios (OR) and for mean differences (MD) we used both fixed-effect and random-effects models and reported 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

From 109 potentially relevant studies only three (104 patients) met our inclusion criteria: Bogie 2007 (46 children), Browne 1997 (29 children) and Nowak 2010 (29 adults). Bogie 2007 investigated the addition of intravenous terbutaline to high dose nebulised albuterol in children with acute severe asthma, requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Browne 1997 investigated the benefit of adding intravenous salbutamol to inhaled salbutamol in children with acute severe asthma in the emergency department. Nowak 2010 investigated addition of IV bedoradrine to standard care (nebulised albuterol, ipratropium and oral corticosteroids) among adults, and was reported as a conference abstract only.There was no significant advantage (OR 0.29; 95%CI 0.06 to 1.38, one trial, 29 adults) for adding IV bedoradrine to standard care (nebulised albuterol, ipratropium and oral corticosteroids) with regard to hospitalisation rates.Various outcome indicators for the length of stay were reported among the trials. Browne 1997 reported a significantly shorter recovery time (in terms of cessation of 30 minute salbutamol) for children in the IV salbutamol with inhaled salbutamol group (four hours) versus the 11.1 hours for the inhaled salbutamol group (P = 0.03). Time to cessation of hourly nebuliser was also significantly shorter (P = 0.02) for the IV plus inhaled salbutamol group (11.5 hours versus 21.2 hours), and they were ready for emergency patient discharge on average 9.7 hours earlier than the inhaled salbutamol group (P < 0.05). In a paediatric ICU study Bogie 2007 reported no significant advantage in length of paediatric ICU admission (hours) for adding IV terbutaline to nebulised albuterol (MD -12.95, 95% CI: -38.74, 12.84).Browne 1997 reported there were only six out of 14 children with a pulmonary index score above six in the IV plus inhaled salbutamol group at two hours compared with 14 of the 15 in the inhaled salbutamol group (P = 0.02)In Browne 1997 there was a higher proportion of tremor in the IV plus inhaled salbutamol group than in the inhaled salbutamol group (P < 0.02). Nowak 2010 did not report any statistically significant adverse effects associated with adding IV bedoradrine to standard care (nebulised albuterol, ipratropium and oral corticosteroids). Troponin levels were elevated in three children in the IV terbutaline + nebulised albuterol group at 12 and 24 hours in Bogie 2007

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is very limited evidence from one study (Browne 1997) to support the use of IV beta(2)-agonists in children with severe acute asthma with respect to shorter recovery time, and similarly there is limited evidence (again from one study Browne 1997) suggesting benefit with regard to pulmonary index scores; however this advantage needs to be considered carefully in relation to the increased side effects associated with IV beta(2)-agonists. We identified no significant benefits for adults with severe acute asthma. Until more, adequately powered, high quality clinical trials in this area are conducted it is not possible to form a robust evaluation of the addition of IV beta(2)-agonists in children or adults with severe acute asthma.

[The effect of inhaled anticholinergic drugs (tiotropium bromide) on asthma patients with persistent obstructive ventilatory impairment]

AIM

This study investigated the effects of tiotropium bromide on chronic asthma patients with persistent obstructive ventilatory impairment (FEV1/FVC%<70%) like COPD.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

Twenty-four patients (14 males, 10 females, mean age 64.3±10.7 years old) were enrolled. They were all treated with a high dose inhaled steroids and a long-acting β2-agonist. All patients had bronchial reversibility, normal diffusing capacity (DLCO) and no low attenuation areas in HRCT. This study examined the FEV1 at baseline and after inhalation of short-acting bronchodilators (400 μg salbutamol and 40 μg ipratropium, 15 minutes and 30 minutes after, respectively). Eleven patients agreed to take an additional treatment with tiotropium, and received 18 μg of tiotropium per daily for one year. The usual treatments were continued for 7 patients that did not agree to take tiotropium and for 6 patients who were ineligible for tiotropium due to co-morbidities. The FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, V50, and IC were compared between the two groups after one year.

RESULTS

FEV1 and V50 were significantly elevated after one year in the tiotropium-treated patients in comparison to those in the 13 subjects that did not receive tiotropium bromide, after adjusting for age, smoking and the values determined on enrollment. There was a positive correlation between the change of FEV1 30 min after ipratropium inhalation (short-term effect) and FEV1 one year after tiotropium inhalation (long-term effect).

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with tiotropium, high dose steroids and long-acting β2 agonist inhalation provides improvement in the expiratory flow limitations of asthma patients with persistent obstructive ventilatory impairment.

Predictors of adherence to inhaled medications among Veterans with COPD

BACKGROUND

Factors contributing to medication nonadherence among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient characteristics that are predictive of adherence to inhaled medications for COPD and, for patients on multiple inhalers, to assess whether adherence to one medication class was associated with adherence to other medication classes.

DESIGN

Cohort study using data from Veteran Affairs (VA) electronic databases.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 2,730 patients who underwent pulmonary function testing between 2003 and 2007 at VA facilities in the Northwestern United States, and who met criteria for COPD.

MAIN MEASURES

We used pharmacy records to estimate adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ipratropium bromide (IP), and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) over two consecutive six month periods. We defined patients as adherent if they had refilled medications to have 80 % of drug available over the time period. We also collected information on their demographics, behavioral habits, COPD severity, and comorbidities.

KEY RESULTS

Adherence to medications was poor, with 19.8 % adherent to ICS, 30.6 % adherent to LABA, and 25.6 % adherent to IP. Predictors of adherence to inhaled therapies were highly variable and dependent on the medication being examined. In adjusted analysis, being adherent to a medication at baseline was the strongest predictor of future adherence to that same medication [(Odds ratio, 95 % confidence interval) ICS: 4.78 (3.21-7.11); LABA: 6.56 (3.89-11.04); IP: 13.96 (9.88-19.72)], [corrected] but did not reliably predict adherence to other classes of medications. [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with COPD, past adherence to one class of inhaled medication strongly predicted future adherence to the same class of medication, but only weakly predicted adherence to other classes of medication.

[Paradoxical reaction to salbutamol in an asthma patient]

Bronchial asthma is a disease with increasing incidence worldwide, being an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis and management of the disease are subject to international guidelines, GINA being updated periodically, according to the latest findings about the disease. The recommendations include the use in all severity stages of short acting beta-2-agonists as reliever of asthma symptoms. We present the case of an asthma patient presenting a life-threatening paradoxical bronchospasm at salbutamol, as well as discussions on the possible pathogenesis of this situation. Paradoxical bronchospasm to salbutamol is a rare situation but can turn into a serious problem for the patient, as well as for the physicians who underestimate this possibility.

Anticholinergic therapy for acute asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled anticholinergics as single agent bronchodilators (or in combination with beta(2)-agonists) are one of the several medications available for the treatment of acute asthma in children.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of only inhaled anticholinergic drugs (i.e. administered alone), compared to a control in children over the age of two years with acute asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Cochrane Airways Group Register of trials were searched by the Cochrane Airways Group. The latest search was performed in April 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which inhaled anticholinergics were given as single therapy and compared with placebo or any other drug or drug combinations for children over the age of two years with acute asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria but were limited by small sample sizes, various treatment regimes used and outcomes assessed. The studies were overall of unclear quality. Data could only be pooled for the outcomes of treatment failure and hospitalisation. Other data could not be combined due to divergent outcome measurements. Meta-analysis revealed that children who received anticholinergics alone were significantly more likely to have treatment failure compared to those who received beta(2)-agonists from four trials on 171 children (odds ratio (OR) 2.27; 95% CI 1.08 to 4.75). Also, treatment failure on anticholinergics alone was more likely than when anticholinergics were combined with beta(2)-agonists from four trials on 173 children (OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.88). Data on clinical scores/symptoms that were measured on different scales were conflicting. Individual trials reported that lung function was superior in the combination group when compared with anticholinergic agents used alone. The use of anticholinergics was not found to be associated with significant side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In children over the age of two years with acute asthma exacerbations, inhaled anticholinergics as single agent bronchodilators were less efficacious than beta(2)-agonists. Inhaled anticholinergics were also less efficacious than inhaled anticholinergics combined with beta(2)-agonists. Inhaled anticholinergic drugs alone are not appropriate for use as a single agent in children with acute asthma exacerbations.

Risk of stroke associated with inhaled ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular safety concerns about inhaled ipratropium bromide have recently been raised. Nonetheless, the specific stroke risk associated with ipratropium use has not been evaluated thoroughly.

METHODS

This was a population-based nested case-control study analyzing data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A cohort of 15,396 newly-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients was included between 2001 and 2007, in which 1477 cases of incident hospitalization for stroke were identified. Each case was individually matched to four randomly-selected controls based on age, sex, and cohort entry date. Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for risk of stroke-related hospitalization associated with ipratropium use.

RESULTS

Any use of ipratropium within the 6 months before the index date was associated with an increased risk of stroke compared with nonuse (adjusted OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.71 to 2.41). The observed risk remained significant regardless of accumulated doses. Additionally, use of ipratropium within 30 days before the index date resulted in the greatest risk (adjusted OR, 2.97 95% CI, 2.27 to 3.88). Furthermore, an increased risk of stroke was found for ipratropium regimens involving concomitant use of inhaled short-acting β(2)-agonists (SABAs; adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.81 to 2.62) or theophyllines (adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ipratropium is associated with an increased risk of stroke in COPD patients. Clinicians should be alert to that risk when prescribing ipratropium, especially for those receiving ipratropium more recently or those with concomitant use of SABAs or theophyllines.

Nebulized budesonide added to standard pediatric emergency department treatment of acute asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES

The goal was to determine if adding inhaled budesonide to standard asthma therapy improves outcomes of pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma.

METHODS

The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary care, urban pediatric ED. Patients 2 to 18 years of age with moderate to severe acute asthma were randomized to receive either a single 2-mg dose of budesonide inhalation suspension (BUD) or normal sterile saline (NSS) placebo, added to albuterol, ipratropium bromide (IB), and systemic corticosteroids (SCS). The primary outcome was the difference in median asthma scores between treatment groups at 2 hours. Secondary outcomes included differences in vital signs and hospitalization rates.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were enrolled. Treatment groups had similar baseline demographics, asthma scores, and vital signs. A total of 169 patients (88 BUD, 81 NSS) were assessed for the primary outcome. No significant difference was found between groups in the change in median asthma score at 2 hours (BUD -3, NSS -3, p = 0.64). Vital signs at 2 hours were also similar between groups. Fifty-six children (62%) were admitted to the hospital in the BUD group and 55 (62%) in the NSS group (difference 0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14% to 14%). Neither multivariate adjustment nor planned subgroup analysis by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) use prior to the ED significantly altered the results.

CONCLUSIONS

For children 2 to 18 years of age treated in the ED for acute asthma, a single 2-mg dose of budesonide added to standard therapy did not improve asthma severity scores or other short-term ED-based outcomes.

Beta agonist use during asthma exacerbations: how much is too much?

Overuse of inhaled beta agonist therapy is associated with risk in adult asthmatics. We report on a case of excessive short-acting and long-acting beta agonist use in the setting of a severe exacerbation of asthma, which highlights some important good practice points.

Asthma in adults (acute)

INTRODUCTION

About 10% of adults have suffered an attack of asthma, and up to 5% of these have severe disease that responds poorly to treatment. Patients with severe disease have an increased risk of death, but patients with mild to moderate disease are also at risk of exacerbations. Most guidelines about the management of asthma follow stepwise protocols. This review does not endorse or follow any particular protocol, but presents the evidence about specific interventions.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for acute asthma? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 100 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: beta(2) agonists (plus ipratropium bromide, pressured metered-dose inhalers, short-acting continuous nebulised, short-acting intermittent nebulised, short-acting iv, and inhaled formoterol); corticosteroids (inhaled); corticosteroids (single oral, combined inhaled, and short courses); education about acute asthma; generalist care; helium-oxygen mixture (heliox); magnesium sulphate (iv and adding isotonic nebulised magnesium to inhaled beta(2) agonists); mechanical ventilation; oxygen supplementation (controlled 28% oxygen and controlled 100% oxygen); and specialist care.

Development and validation of a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous determination of albuterol, budesonide, and ipratropium bromide in compounded nebulizer solutions

In recent years, there has been a large increase in the use of pharmaceutical compounding to prepare medications that are not commercially available. The treatment of asthma typically includes the use of albuterol (ALB), ipratropium bromide (IPB), and/or budesonide (BUD) nebulizer solutions. There is currently no commercially available nebulizer solution containing all three of these compounds, and patients must rely on often-unregulated compounding. There is a distinct need for methodologies that can be used to analyze compounded formulations to ensure patient safety. We report an HPLC-UV method to separate and quantitate ALB, IPB, and BUD in nebulizer solutions. The method used a gradient elution to achieve separation via an RP C18 column. The method was validated, showed good selectivity, and was linear over several orders of magnitude. The method was applied to the analysis of nebulizer solutions and determination of their storage stability. Significant ALB-dependent degradation occurred within 5 h in solutions formulated with the free base of ALB, while those containing the sulfate salt of ALB produced no degradation. Alkali solutions can cause base-catalyzed hydrolysis of IPB and degradation of BUD. Compounded formulations containing ALB need to include an acid to control pH and prevent degradation.

[The compatibility between packing material and ipratropium bromide aerosol]

With the establishment of HPLC and LC-MS methods to determine the related substances and the content of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in ipratropium bromide aerosol products, several packing material-related impurities were identified, including antioxygen BHT and antioxygen 2246. Results showed that these leachable additives from the packing materials may present at a relative high level in the drug solution, and the low content of API in the drug products is usually due to the adsorption of the packing material as well as the leaking of contents. The current available assay methods for the control of ipratropium bromide aerosol products are often lack of specificity and unable to assure the drug quality effectively. To meet the increasing attention on the regulations of drug packing materials, our research would be a pilot study, indicating that the inappropriate packing materials could cause the migration and adsorption of the active ingredients, and the importance to have compatibility studies between packing materials and drugs.

Use of ozone-depleting substances; removal of essential-use designation (flunisolide, etc.). Final rule

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), after consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is amending FDA's regulation on the use of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in self-pressurized containers to remove the essential-use designations for flunisolide, triamcinolone, metaproterenol, pirbuterol, albuterol and ipratropium in combination, cromolyn, and nedocromil used in oral pressurized metered-dose inhalers (MDIs). The Clean Air Act requires FDA, in consultation with the EPA, to determine whether an FDA-regulated product that releases an ODS is an essential use of the ODS. FDA has concluded that there are no substantial technical barriers to formulating flunisolide, triamcinolone, metaproterenol, pirbuterol, albuterol and ipratropium in combination, cromolyn, and nedocromil as products that do not release ODSs, and therefore they will no longer be essential uses of ODSs as of the effective dates of this rule. MDIs for these active moieties containing an ODS may not be marketed after the relevant effective date.

Effects of intranasal xylometazoline, alone or in combination with ipratropium, in patients with common cold

BACKGROUND

Common cold is one of the most prevalent conditions that family doctors encounter. One of the first symptoms to occur is nasal congestion, which can have a negative impact on daily life and prompts many patients to seek treatment for relief. Xylometazoline nasal spray (Otrivin*) is a topical decongestant that has been used successfully for many years and is generally recognized as an effective and safe therapy. However, most studies have investigated its clinical efficacy in healthy patients and few have included patients with common cold.

SCOPE

To review the published clinical efficacy and safety of xylometazoline alone and in combination in the management of nasal congestion in patients with common cold. Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were conducted to obtain published open or blinded, randomized, placebo- or active-controlled studies on the use of xylometazoline hydrochloride for the symptomatic relief of nasal congestion in patients with common cold. Searches included papers published in English only, up to September 2009.

FINDINGS

Despite the small number of studies identified in common cold (n = 4), as per search criteria defined, intranasal xylometazoline quickly and effectively relieved nasal congestion. When used alone, xylometazoline had a clinically relevant decongestant effect that was significantly superior for up to 10 hours compared with placebo. The superior decongestant effect with xylometazoline led to high patient satisfaction with treatment. When used in combination with ipratropium bromide, nasal congestion and rhinorrhoea were treated simultaneously, leading to significantly higher patient general impression scores compared with either agent used alone. Xylometazoline was well tolerated, with generally mild to moderate nasal-related side effects (e.g. epistaxis in 3.4% of patients, and blood-tinged mucus in 10-26% of patients) that were easily resolved; the most frequently reported non-nasal AEs were headache (3.4%) and period pain (10.3%); no cases of sedation were reported. As expected, no rhinitis medicamentosa or rebound congestion was noted with short-term use (<10 days). No clinically important differences in ciliary motility and mucociliary clearance were observed. Xylometazoline does not result in sympathomimetic systemic side effects seen with oral decongestants (e.g. pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine).

CONCLUSIONS

The few studies available in common cold suggest that intranasal xylometazoline provides fast and effective relief of nasal congestion and is well tolerated. When xylometazoline is used in combination with ipratropium, patients with common cold experience the additive benefit of nasal congestion and rhinorrhoea being treated simultaneously.

Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat inhaler versus MDI

We compared the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat inhaler, a novel propellant-free inhaler, versus chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-metered dose inhaler (MDI) and ipratropium Respimat inhaler in patients with COPD. This was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week, parallel-group, active-controlled study. Patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomized to ipratropium bromide/albuterol (20/100mcg) Respimat inhaler, ipratropium bromide/albuterol MDI [36mcg/206mcg (Combivent Inhalation Aerosol MDI)], or ipratropium bromide (20mcg) Respimat inhaler. Each medication was administered four times daily. Serial spirometry was performed over 6h (0.15min, then hourly) on 4 test days. The primary efficacy variable was forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) change from test day baseline at 12 weeks. A total of 1209 of 1480 randomized, treated patients completed the study; the majority were male (65%) with a mean age of 64 yrs and a mean screening pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) (percent predicted) of 41%. Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler had comparable efficacy to ipratropium bromide/albuterol MDI for FEV(1) area under the curve at 0-6h (AUC(0-6)), superior efficacy to ipratropium Respimat inhaler for FEV(1) AUC(0-4) and comparable efficacy to ipratropium Respimat inhaler for FEV(1) AUC(4-6). All active treatments were well tolerated. This study demonstrates that ipratropium bromide/albuterol 20/100mcg inhaler administered four times daily for 12 weeks had equivalent bronchodilator efficacy and comparable safety to ipratropium bromide/albuterol 36mcg/206mcg MDI, and significantly improved lung function compared with the mono-component ipratropium bromide 20 mcg Respimat inhaler. [Clinical Trial Identifier Number: NCT00400153].

[Efficacy of two methods of administration of salbutamol-ipratropium bromide in asthma crises]

BACKGROUND

Asthma acute crisis is one of the most frequent pediatric emergencies. Quick treatment with an efficient inhaled therapy may diminish considerably the number of hospitalizations and time of crises.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of administration of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide by nebulization with supplementary oxygen vs salbutamol and ipratropium bromide administered in device of measured doses with space chamber for treatment of asthmatic crises in children.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

45 children from 1 to 12 years of age were randomly selected; they were divided into two groups and were classified according to respiratory difficulty degree. Then inhaled therapy proposed was administered three times, and oximetry and hospitalization criteria were determined.

RESULTS

Pediatric patients with non-severe asthma crisis had a better course with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide combination administered by device of measures doses and space chamber than with the same drugs nebulized with supplementary oxygen, and percentage of hospitalizations of children with asthma crises was reduced (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Administration of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide with device of measured doses was more efficient that their administration nebulized with supplementary oxygen for treating asthmatic crises in children.

N-nitrosamines as "special case" leachables in a metered dose inhaler drug product

N-nitrosamines are chemical entities, some of which are considered to be possible human carcinogens, which can be found at trace levels in some types of foods, tobacco smoke, certain cosmetics, and certain types of rubber. N-nitrosamines are of regulatory concern as leachables in inhalation drug products, particularly metered dose inhalers, which incorporate rubber seals into their container closure systems. The United States Food and Drug Administration considers N-nitrosamines (along with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole) to be "special case" leachables in inhalation drug products, meaning that there are no recognized safety or analytical thresholds and these compounds must therefore be identified and quantitated at the lowest practical level. This report presents the development of a quantitative analytical method for target volatile N-nitrosamines in a metered dose inhaler drug product, Atrovent HFA. The method incorporates a target analyte recovery procedure from the drug product matrix with analysis by gas chromatography/thermal energy analysis detection. The capability of the method was investigated with respect to specificity, linearity/range, accuracy (linearity of recovery), precision (repeatability, intermediate precision), limits of quantitation, standard/sample stability, and system suitability. Sample analyses showed that Atrovent HFA contains no target N-nitrosamines at the trace level of 1 ng/canister.

Comparative efficacy of combined nebulized salbutamol with ipratropium bromide and nebulized adrenaline to treat children with acute bronchiolitis

As the efficacy of combined nebulized salbutamol & ipratropium bromide as well as L-adrenaline to treat acute bronchiolitis is not well studied among the Bangladeshi infants, this study was carried out to see their efficacy in acute bronchiolitis and to compare their effectiveness. This randomized clinical trial was done among 60 children aged less than 02 years, admitted in the department of Pediatrics, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, during January through December 2005 with acute bronchiolitis. After a quick initial assessment, nebulization were done twice at 6 hours interval with the mentioned drugs, group wise (one group with salbutamol plus ipratropium bromide and other group with L-adrenaline alone) and the outcomes were assessed after 30 minutes of each nebulization in respect to oxygen saturation and clinical modified respiratory distress assessment instrument (MRDAI) scores. The results were analyzed by using SPSS version 10.0 and at a p value of </=0.05, the test was considered significant. The clinical characteristics were similar in both the groups. After 02 doses of nebulizations by the studied drugs, a significant improvement in respect to oxygen saturation and MRDAI score were noted among the children in both the groups, compared to their baseline status (p=0.000). However, L-adrenaline showed more efficacy (MRDAI, p=0.021; SaO2, p=0.034) than combined Salbutamol & Ipratropium bromide. Both L-adrenaline and combined salbutamol & ipratropium bromide were found effective in acute bronchiolitis but L-adrenaline was found more effective. A large multi-centre clinical trial is recommended.

In vitro deposition properties of nebulized formoterol fumarate: effect of nebulization time, airflow, volume of fill and nebulizer type

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the delivery of a new long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) drug formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (20 microg/2 mL) nebulized with and without ipratropium bromide (0.5 mg/2.5 mL) at different administration times (2.5-22.5 min), airflows (5-28.3 L/min), nebulizer fill volumes (2-6 mL),and nebulizer brands (Pari LC+, Ventstream and DeVilbiss).

METHOD

Formoterol fumarate with and without ipratropium bromide was aerosolized at different administration times, airflows, nebulizer fill volumes, and nebulizer brands. The drug deposited on the throat, filter and stage plates was collected and analyzed by HPLC to determine the aerodynamic profiles of the nebulized drugs under each variable.

RESULTS

In addition to altering the aerosol characteristics,increasing the nebulizer fill volume including the addition of ipratropium bromide produced a significant(p50.05) increase in the drug output. As expected, sputtering time was significantly longer at low airflows, and vice versa at higher airflows but with a significant loss of drug delivered presumably due to greater solvent evaporation at higher airflows. Airflows between 10 and 28.3 L/min and a nebulization time of approximately 10 min appear sufficient for producing aerosols within the respirable range (1-5 mm MMAD) with the nebulizer/compressor combination used.While the drug output varied significantly (p50.05) among the three brands of nebulizers tested, the LC+ nebulizer appears to produce aerosols (2.7 0.1 microm MMAD) capable of penetrating more deeply into the lung than the other nebulizers evaluated under the current test conditions. This study did not attempt to evaluate different nebulizer/compressor combinations. Also, the cascade impaction data may not necessarily reflect aerosol deposition in the airways in vivo, which may be different depending on the health status of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that administration of nebulized formoterol fumarate require proper selection of a delivery system/method for safe and effective therapy of the medication with and without ipratropium bromide.

Nebulized formoterol effect on bronchodilation and satisfaction in COPD patients compared to QID ipratropium/albuterol MDI

OBJECTIVE

Bronchodilator maintenance treatment improves pulmonary function and health-related quality of life in COPD patients. Pulmonary function and patient preference/satisfaction were compared before and after treatment with a short-acting ipratropium/albuterol combination and long-acting nebulized formoterol.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, crossover trial was conducted at 16 centers in the US. COPD subjects (n=109, 52.8% predicted FEV1) received nebulized formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (Perforomist**, FFIS 20g BID) or ipratropium and albuterol combined in a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) (Combiventy, IPR-ALB, QID) for 2 weeks. After a 1-week washout, subjects were crossed over to the other treatment. Efficacy was assessed with 6-h pulmonary function tests and the transition dyspnea index (TDI). Treatment satisfaction and preference were assessed after treatment. Post-hoc subgroup analyses were conducted by age, gender and COPD severity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Morning pre-dose FEV1 (trough) after 2 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

FFIS significantly increased morning pre-dose FEV1 relative to IPR-ALB (p = 0.0015). FFIS also improved pre-dose FEV1 beyond that of IPR-ALB in subjects who were older (65 years), male, and with both moderate and severe/very severe COPD. Post-dose efficacy at 6 h was maintained in the FFIS group compared with IPR-ALB (p<or= 0.0001). Patient satisfaction and the perception of disease control were significantly greater with FFIS in the older, male, and severe subgroups. Severe subjects preferred FFIS to IPR-ALB. Both FFIS and IPR-ALB treatments resulted in clinically meaningful changes in dyspnea, but no significant differences were observed between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a 2-week treatment period, twice-daily nebulized FFIS was significantly more effective in improving lung function than the IPR-ALB combination MDI delivered four times daily. Although the open-label design may limit interpretation of pulmonary function, the crossover design enabled demonstration of greater treatment satisfaction and perception of disease control following nebulized FFIS treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00462540.

Healthcare costs associated with initial maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate 250 μg/salmeterol 50 μg combination versus anticholinergic bronchodilators in elderly US Medicare-eligible beneficiaries with COPD

OBJECTIVE

To compare, in elderly Medicare beneficiaries, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related healthcare costs for patients initiating treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 μg/50 μg (FSC) with those for patients initiating treatment with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (IPA), ipratropium bromide (IPR), and tiotropium bromide (TIO).

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, COPD-related medical costs (inpatient/emergency department, outpatient) and pharmacy costs were assessed in Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years old who were enrolled in a commercial Medicare health maintenance organization plan and had a diagnosis of COPD (ICD-9-CM codes 491.xx, 492.xx, or 496.xx) within 12 months before initial treatment with FSC, IPA, IPR, or TIO.

RESULTS

In these ≥ 65-year-old patients (N=14,689), initial maintenance treatment with FSC was associated with total COPD-related cost savings (medical + pharmacy) of $295 versus IPA, $1,235 versus IPR, and $110 versus TIO (p<0.05, each comparison) over a 1-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of maintenance therapy with FSC was associated with significant reduction in total costs (medical + pharmacy) relative to costs associated with the short-acting anticholinergic bronchodilators IPR and IPA and the long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator TIO in an elderly Medicare-eligible population. These data considered in the context of the substantial efficacy and effectiveness data suggest that early introduction of maintenance treatment with FSC has both clinical and economic benefits. Limitations inherent in handling of administrative data include lack of objective clinical measures such as spirometry and smoking status. Furthermore, accuracy of diagnosis codes cannot be verified.

Transient expiratory flow interruptions (TEFI) increase expiratory flow in acute asthma exacerbation

We have shown that expiratory flows increase when expirations are rapidly interrupted in stable asthmatic patients. We hypothesized that a similar increase could be obtained in patients with acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma treated in the Emergency Room. A total of 30 asthmatic patients were randomly allocated into two groups, the study and the control groups. Patients in the study group were connected to a device with an inspiratory line designed to administer pressurized aerosols. The expiratory line passed through a valve completely interrupting flow at 4 Hz, with an open/closed time ratio of 10/3. The control group patients were also connected to the device, but with the valve kept open. Mean expiratory flow at tidal volume (MEFTV) was measured under basal conditions and at 4, 8 and 12 minutes after connecting the patients to the device. All patients received standard treatment throughout the procedure. At all time points MEFTV increased more in the study than in the control group (p < 0.003 by two-way ANOVA). There was no residual effect after disconnection from the device. We conclude that TEFI can rapidly improve expiratory flows in patients with acute exacerbations of asthma, while pharmacologic interventions proceed.

Healthcare use and costs in patients with chronic bronchitis initiating maintenance therapy with fluticasone/salmeterol vs other inhaled maintenance therapies

OBJECTIVE

To compare risk of hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit and healthcare costs in patients with chronic bronchitis initiating inhaled maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 mcg combination (FSC) versus other inhaled maintenance therapies.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed 9,217 patients from the PharMetrics administrative claims database enrolled from July 1997 to January 2005. Study subjects were persons with medical claims with diagnoses of chronic bronchitis (ICD-9-CM 491.xx) who also had pharmacy claims for FSC, salmeterol (SAL), inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), ipratropium (IPR), or ipratropium/albuterol combination (IAC). Persons with <12 months of continuous eligibility after the first prescription for initial maintenance therapy ("index date") were excluded as were those receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 100/50 mcg or 500/50 mcg (not indicated for patients with chronic bronchitis). For remaining persons, time to first hospitalization or ED visit during follow-up was compared for those receiving FSC versus other therapies using Cox proportional hazards regression. Healthcare costs during the first 12 months of follow-up were analyzed using generalized linear model regression.

RESULTS

Receipt of FSC as initial inhaled maintenance therapy for chronic bronchitis (n = 1361) was associated with 41% lower risk of COPD-related hospitalization or ED visit compared with IPR (n < 1316) (p < 0.001). Adjusted costs of COPD-related hospitalization/ED visit were $507 (95% CI $218-$1083) less with FSC than IPR. However, patients receiving FSC had $261 (95% CI $205-$322) higher COPD-related pharmacy costs than those receiving IPR. Total COPD-related costs were $90 lower with FSC than IPR although this difference was not significant (95% CI $330-$443). Compliance, as measured by medication possession ratio, was 12% greater with FSC compared with IPR (p < 0.05). Comparisons of FSC with IAC yielded generally similar results. The limitations of the study are similar to those of other observational studies of secondary data regarding potential misclassification and omitted variable bias and residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In persons with chronic bronchitis, initial maintenance therapy with FSC 250/50 mcg was associated with improved outcomes versus ipratropium-based therapy and although FSC was associated with greater pharmacy costs, it did not significantly increase total costs of COPD-related care.

[Association of A/T polymorphism of the CHRM2 gene with bronchodilator response to ipratropium bromide in asthmatic children]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the possible association of A/T polymorphism of the CHRM2 gene with asthma, and pharmacogenetic analysis of the polymorphism with bronchodilator response to ipratropium bromide, an anticholinergic drug used in asthma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analysis was performed in a group of 113 children diagnosed with bronchial asthma, and in a group of 123 healthy children from a control group. Moreover, in the group of 32 asthmatic children without concurrent treatment with long-acting beta2-agonists, bronchodilator response to ipratropium bromide was evaluated by the spirometric lung function test. Genetic analysis was performed for A/T polymorphism (rs6962027) of the CHRM2 gene. Genotyping was done with the PCR-RFLP method. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica v.7.1 software.

RESULTS

No association of A/T polymorphism was found with asthma (p=0.865 for genotypes and p=0.782 for alleles). In the pharmacogenetic analysis, it was observed that patients carrying TT genotype of CHRM2 gene polymorphism demonstrated significantly poorer response to anticholinergic drug as compared to the patients with other genotypes for this polymorphism (p=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that TT genotype in the CHRM2 gene was associated with poor bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients. The results should be analyzed carefully considering the small sample size and should be confirmed by other research groups.

Chemical and physical compatibility of levalbuterol inhalation solution concentrate mixed with budesonide, ipratropium bromide, cromolyn sodium, or acetylcysteine sodium

BACKGROUND

Medications are frequently combined in the nebulizer cup, so it is important to determine their chemical and physical compatibility.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the chemical and physical compatibility of levalbuterol with ipratropium bromide, cromolyn sodium, acetylcysteine sodium, and budesonide.

METHODS

We mixed one dose of levalbuterol inhalation solution concentrate (1.25 mg/0.5 mL) with one dose of ipratropium bromide (0.5 mg/2.5 mL), cromolyn sodium (20 mg/2 mL), acetylcysteine sodium (1,000 mg/5 mL), or budesonide (0.5 mg/2 mL). Immediately after mixing the 2 drugs (time zero [T(0)]), and again after 30 min at room temperature (T(30)), we visually inspected the admixtures, measured their pH, and conducted high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

There was no evidence of physical incompatibility with these drugs combinations. With all the admixtures, both drugs were chemically stable for at least 30-min. Admixture pH had not changed significantly at T(30). Drug recovery was 93.2-102.6% of the initial or control values.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-drug admixtures we studied were compatible for at least 30 min at room temperature.

[Efficacy of pulmicort suspension plus salbutamol and ipratropium bromide for management of acute asthma exacerbation in children: a comparative study]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of 3 commonly used protocols for management of acute exacerbation of asthma in children.

METHODS

Totally 113 asthmatic children were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (53 cases), the children were treated with inhalation of nebulized budesonide suspension plus salbutamol and ipratropium bromide twice daily for 5 days; in group B (41 cases), budesonide plus salbutamol and ipratropium aerosol was administered, and in group C (29 cases), dexathmisone plus aminophylline injection was given once daily for 5 days. All the children received basic treatment with fluid infusion, antibiotics or/and anti-virus medications.

RESULTS

The children in both groups A and C showed effectively controlled asthma attack, with significant differences in the therapeutic effects (P>0.05). In contrast, only a few children showed improvement in group B, suggesting the ineffectiveness of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized medicine is one of the best means for management of acute asthma exacerbation in children, and inhalation of budesonide suspension plus salbutamol and ipratropium bromide can effectively relieve the asthmatic symptoms in these children with good compliance and convenient administration.

Investigation of the effects of intranasal botulinum toxin type A and ipratropium bromide nasal spray on nasal hypersecretion in idiopathic rhinitis without eosinophilia

Idiopathic rhinitis without eosinophilia is a group of frequently observed diseases, the aetiopathogenesis of which is not yet well known. One of the most disturbing symptoms for patients within this disease group is nasal hypersecretion. Although many different treatments have been tried for hypersecretion, nasal topical drugs form the basis of any such therapy today. Ipratropium bromide (IB) is a drug offirst choice in nasal hypersecretion therapy. It displays a parasympatholytic effect in topical use and antagonizes acetylcholine transport in efferent parasympathetic nerves, thus decreasing submucosal gland secretion, which is the cause of hypersecretion. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is among the alternative treatment choices that is increasingly used in symptomatic treatment of nasal hypersecretion. Our study was planned with the aim of comparing the effect of these two groups of drugs on nasal hypersecretion. Thirty-eight patients who were diagnosed with idiopathic rhinitis without eosinophilia were included in the study and were divided in 3 different groups: In the first group, a total of 10 units of BTX-A were injected into both nasal cavities. In the second group, 3x2 IB was injected into both nasal cavities for 4 weeks. The third group received intranasal physiologic saline as placebo. The patients were evaluated in terms of nasal hypersecretion with visual analogue scale prior to the treatment and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 during the follow-up period. Throughout the 8 weeks follow-up period, the patient complaints displayed a 41.2% decrease in the group that received BTX-A and a 61.4% decrease in the group which received IB, while no change was observed in the control group. Both drug groups were well tolerated by the patients, with no serious adverse or systemic effects. As a result, while IB and BTX-A differ in terms of method of application, they display a similar degree and duration of efficiency in hypersecretion therapy.

Ipratropium bromide spray as treatment for sialorrhea in Parkinson's disease

Sialorrhea is a significant problem in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Current treatment options include systemic anticholinergics which frequently cause side effects. We hypothesized that sublingual application of ipratropium bromide spray, an anticholinergic agent that does not cross the blood brain barrier, may reduce drooling without systemic side effects. We performed a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 17 subjects with PD and bothersome drooling. Patients were randomized to receive ipratropium bromide or placebo (one to two sprays, maximum of four times per day) for 2 weeks followed by a 1 week washout and crossover for further 2 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome was an objective measure of weight of saliva production. Secondary outcomes were subjective rating of severity and frequency of sialorrhoea using home diaries, United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II salivation subscore, parkinsonian disability using UPDRS, and adverse events. Ipratropium bromide spray had no significant effect on weight of saliva produced. There was a mild effect of treatment on subjective measures of sialorrhea. There were no significant adverse events. Ipratropium bromide spray was well tolerated in subjects with PD. Although it did not affect objective measures of saliva production, further studies in parkinsonism may be warranted.

Effects of Short-Acting Bronchodilators Added to Maintenance Tiotropium Therapy

BACKGROUND

Combining bronchodilators has been shown to be beneficial in patients with COPD. The additive effects of short-acting bronchodilators added to maintenance tiotropium therapy, however, are unknown.

METHODS

Following 3 weeks of tiotropium pretreatment, 60 patients with COPD (FEV1 40% of predicted) participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess add-on bronchodilator effects of ipratropium bromide (40 microg) or fenoterol (200 microg). Short-acting bronchodilators were added as a single dose 2 h and 8 h after tiotropium dosing. Serial lung function tests were performed over 9 h.

RESULTS

The peak FEV1 add-on response within 6 h with fenoterol was significantly greater than with placebo (137 mL) or ipratropium (84 mL); the response with ipratropium was slightly but significantly larger than with placebo (52 mL). One hour after the second dose of the test drugs, a similar order of treatment responses was found. The peak FVC add-on response was significant for fenoterol (249 mL) but not for ipratropium (42 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, both short-acting bronchodilator classes were effective when added to maintenance treatment with tiotropium. The addition of the beta2-adrenergic fenoterol provided greater additional bronchodilatation than the short-acting anticholinergic ipratropium. This is consistent with the expected effects of combining bronchodilators with different pharmacologic mechanisms. This randomized controlled trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00274066).

Physicochemical compatibility of nebulizable drug mixtures containing dornase alfa and ipratropium and/or albuterol

Patients suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF) often need to inhale multiple doses of different nebulizable drugs per day. Patients attempt to shorten the time consuming administration procedure by mixing drug solutions/suspensions for simultaneous inhalation. The objective of this experimental study was to determine whether mixtures of Pulmozyme inhalation solution with Atrovent or Sultano are physicochemically compatible. Drug combinations were prepared in accordance with the product information and clinical practice by mixing the content of one respule Pulmozyme with 2 mL Atrovent LS and 0.5 mL Sultanol Inhalationslösung (inhalation solution) or with one respule of either Atrovent 500 microg/2 mL Fertiginhalat (unit dose formulation) or Sultanol forte Fertiginhalat. Test solutions were stored at room temperature and exposed to light. Dornase alfa activity was determined by a kinetic colorimetric DNase activity assay. Ipratropium bromide and albuterol concentrations were investigated by a stability-indicating HPLC assay with ultraviolet detection. Physical compatibility was determined by visual inspection and measurements of pH and osmolality. Ipratropium bromide and albuterol concentrations were not affected by mixing the drug products. Dornase alfa activity is affected by benzalkonium chloride, used as excipient in Atrovent"LS and Sultanol'Inhalationsl6öung, and disodium edetate used as an excipient in AtroventfLS. Patients should be advised not to mix Pulmozymelwith Atrovent1LS and/or Sultanol"Inhalationsldöung, because of the incompatibility reaction. Mixtures of Pulmozyme with Atrovent 500 microg/2 mL Fertiginhalat or Sultanol forte Fertiginhalat can be designated as compatible for a limited period of time.

[Inhaled therapy via nebulization: practical issues]

Inhaled therapy represents a mainstay component in treatment of many chronic respiratory conditions. It offers the advantage of local delivery of the active substance at lower doses, with consequent reduction of systemic side effects. Inhaled medication can be delivered with various types of devices including nebulizers. Nebulization have advantages and disadvantages compared with the other devices and requires a specific technique and patient education in advance. In Romania there are several pharmaceutical forms which can be given via nebulisation, however, this method is not widely used. Better knowledge of practical issues related with nebulization, which is the aim of this paper, could contribute to a more effective use of.

Comparing COPD treatment: nebulizer, metered dose inhaler, and concomitant therapy

PURPOSE

Patients using albuterol and ipratropium for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can use either nebulizers or metered dose inhalers. This study compared the 2 methods of delivering medication and the concomitant use of both nebulizer and inhaler, with respect to health-related quality of life, patient symptoms, and efficacy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients over 50 years old with COPD were randomized into 3 groups: nebulizer, inhaler, or concomitant treatment. Quality of life was assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks. Other efficacy measurements at these time-points included pre- and post-dose forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1). Symptom scores and peak flow measurements were recorded in patient diaries.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients enrolled, 126 completed at least one post-baseline assessment. At week 6, both groups using a nebulizer achieved statistically significant improvements from baseline in questionnaire symptoms, and the concomitant treatment group had clinically and statistically significant improvement in total questionnaire score. At week 12, the concomitant group still maintained significant improvement in symptom sub-scores. The 3 groups showed little change over time in peak flow or FEV1, with no significant difference among groups. Both groups using a nebulizer had significant improvement over time in diary symptom scores, although differences between groups were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using combined nebulizer therapy morning and night with mid-day inhaler use had the most statistically significant improvements in quality of life indices. This concomitant regimen provides the additional symptom relief offered by a nebulizer with the convenience of an inhaler when patients are away from home.