Medical lung volume reduction for severe emphysema: A review

By deflating the lungs pulmonologists help the cardiologists. A literature review

In this review, we present the effects of lung hyperinflation on the cardiovascular system (CVS) and the beneficial outcomes of different deflation treatment modalities. We discuss the effects of long-acting bronchodilator drugs, medical and surgical lung volume reduction on the performance of the CVS. Although there is a small number of studies investigating lung deflation and the CVS, the short-term improvement in heart function was clearly demonstrated. However, more studies, with longer duration, are needed to verify these significant beneficial effects of deflation of the lungs on the CVS. Dynamic hyperinflation during exercise could be a research model to investigate further the effects of lung hyperinflation and/or deflation on the CVS.

When Treatment of Pulmonary Emphysema with Endobronchial Valves Did Not Work: Evaluation of Quantitative CT Analysis and Pulmonary Function Tests Before and After Valve Explantation

Purpose

To investigate changes in quantitative CT analysis (QCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT) in pulmonary emphysema patients who required premature removal of endobronchial valves (EBV).

Patients and Methods

Our hospital’s medical records listed 274 patients with high-grade COPD (GOLD stages 3 and 4) and pulmonary emphysema who were treated with EBV to reduce lung volume. Prior to intervention, a complete evaluation was performed that included quantitative computed tomography analysis (QCT) of scans acquired at full inspiration and full expiration, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and paraclinical findings (6-minute walking distance test (6MWDT) and quality of life questionnaires). In 41 of these 274 patients, EBV treatment was unsuccessful and the valves had to be removed for various reasons. A total of 10 of these 41 patients ventured a second attempt at EBV therapy and underwent complete reevaluation. In our retrospective study, results from three time points were compared: Before EBV implantation (BL), after EBV implantation (TP2), and after EBV explantation (TP3). QCT parameters included lung volume, total emphysema score (TES, ie, the emphysema index) and the 15th percentile of lung attenuation (P15) for the whole lung and each lobe separately. Differences in these parameters between inspiration and expiration were calculated (Vol. Diff (%), TES Diff (%), P15 Diff (%)). The results of PFT and further clinical tests were taken from the patient’s records.

Results

We found persistent therapy effect in the target lobe even after valve explantation together with a compensatory hyperinflation of the rest of the lung. As a result of these two divergent effects, the volume of the total lung remained rather constant. Furthermore, there was a slight deterioration of the emphysema score for the whole lung, whereas the TES of the target lobe persistently improved.

Conclusion

Interestingly, we found evidence that, contrary to our expectations, unsuccessful EBV therapy can have a persistent positive effect on target lobe QCT scores.

The different phenotypes of COPD

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To improve the health status and reduce symptom burden, it is important to identify a group of patients with similar characteristics and prognosis, called clinical phenotypes. Herein we shall review the different phenotypes of COPD.

SOURCES OF DATA

Keywords (COPD, phenotype, acute exacerbation) search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Those with raised blood eosinophil counts respond better to steroid therapy at stable state and exacerbation.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

There is no universally accepted blood eosinophil cut-off value that will indicate favourable response to corticosteroids and potentially for future biologic therapy.

GROWING POINTS

There is an urgent need for further therapeutic options for COPD patients with non-eosinophilic inflammation.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Well-designed COPD trials with identification of phenotypes for more personalization of the treatment of COPD.

The efficacy of continuous nursing care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a kind of disease that can be prevented and treated. It is characterized by the progressive limitation of airflow and is one of the most familiar human health barriers worldwide. For our program, the objective is to evaluate the impact of continuous care on the life quality of the COPD patients.

METHODS:

This study will be implemented from June 2021 to March 2022 at Shandong Chest Hospital. The experiment was granted through the Research Ethics Committee of Shandong Chest Hospital (0029-4651). The criteria for inclusion involves: (1).. patients diagnosed with COPD; (2).. patients with expectorant, chronic cough, dyspnea, and other symptoms; (3).. patients who volunteered to take part in our study; (4).. have the cognitive ability to take part in interviews and fill in questionnaires. The criteria for exclusion contains: (1).. patients with unstable physical conditions, for instance, congestive heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular diseases, and malignant tumor; (2).. suffering from bronchial asthma or bronchiectasis; (3).. patients with serious physical dysfunction; (4).. patients who are unwilling to offer the informed consent to take part in this experiment. For our research, the result measure is St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

RESULTS:

Table 1 reflects the comparison results of 2 groups after the intervention.

CONCLUSION:

The continuous care on the basis of the theory of Information, Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (IKAP) can promote the improvement of life quality in the COPD patients. Trial registration number: researchregistry 6266.

Endobronchial valve vs coil for lung volume reduction in emphysema: results from a tertiary care centre in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) by either the endobronchial valve (EBV) or coil (EBC) procedure is recommended for severe emphysematous patients. BLVR applications generally help healthy lung areas ventilate more comfortably by reducing the hyperinflation and improving the contraction capacity of diaphragm.

OBJECTIVES

Compare our experience with valve and coil BLVR devices.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Single tertiary care centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Demographic data, vital signs, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), the six-minute walking test (6MWT), vital signs, arterial blood gases and complications were recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in PFTs and completion of the 6MWT.

SAMPLE SIZE

60 Turkish men with a diagnosis of chronic pulmonary lung disease.

RESULTS

Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar in patients who underwent EBV and EBC. Thirty (96.8%) EBV patients and 27 (93.1%) of the EBC patients were able to properly complete the PFT before the procedures, but all complied after the procedures. Significant improvement in PFTs were achieved after the procedure and there were no statistically significant differences in post-procedure performance. For the 6MWT, the completion rate improved from 15 (48.4%) to 19 (61.3%) patients in the EBV patients (P=.125) and from 19 (65.5%) to 21 (72.4%) patients in the EBC patients (P=.500). There was no significant difference in completion rates for the walking test for either group (median 32 meters in EBV patients and 37 meters in EBC patients; P=.652). Vital signs and arterial blood gases were similar in the two groups. The rates of complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Endobronchial valves and coils are safe and effective methods for BLVR for patients with severe emphysema.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small sample, retrospective design, single-centre retrospective study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction procedures for emphysema: A network meta-analysis

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) offers alternative novel treatments for patients with emphysema. Comprehensive evidence for comparing different BLVR remains unclear. To estimate the effects of different BLVR on patients with emphysema. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from January 2001 to August 2017 were searched. Randomized clinical trials evaluated effects of BLVR on patients with emphysema. The relevant information was extracted from the published reports with a predefined data extraction sheet, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tools. Pair-wise metaanalyses were made using the random-effects model. A random-effects network meta-analysis was applied within a Bayesian framework. The quality of evidence contributing to primary outcomes was assessed using the GRADE framework. 13 trials were deemed eligible, including 1993 participants. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate in most comparisons. Medical care (MC)was associated with the lowest adverse events compared with intrabronchial valve (IBV)(-2.5,[-4.70 to -0.29]), endobronchial valve (EBV) (-1.73, [-2.37 to -1.09]), lung volume reduction coils (LVRC) (-0.76, [-1.24 to -0.28]), emphysematous lung sealant (ELS) (-1.53, [-2.66 to -0.39]), and airway bypass(-1.57, [-3.74 to 0.61]). Adverse events in LVRC were lower compared with ELS (-0.77,[-2.00 to 0.47]). Bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) showed significant improvement in FEV1 compared with MC (0.99, [0.37 to 1.62]), IBV (1.25, [0.25 to 2.25]), and LVRC (0.72, [0.03 to 1.40] ). Six  minute walking distance (6 MWD) in ELS was significantly improved compared with other four BLVR, sham control, and MC (-1.96 to 1.99). Interestingly, MC showed less improvement in FEV1 and 6MWDcompared with EBV (-0.45, [-0.69 to -0.20] and -0.39, [-0.71 to -0.07], respectively). The mortality in MC and EBV was lower compared with LVRC alone (-0.38, [-1.16 to 0.41] and -0.50, [-1.68 to 0.68], respectively). BTVA and EBV led to significant changes in St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) compared with MC alone (-0.74, [-1.43 to -0.05] and 0.44, [0.11 to 0.78], respectively). BLVR offered a clear advantage for patients with emphysema. EBV had noticeable beneficial effects on the improvement of forced expiratory volume 1, 6MWD and SGRQ, and was associated with lower mortality compared with MC in different strategies of BLVR.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using an endobronchial valve to treat a huge emphysematous bullae: a case report

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) techniques using unidirectional endobronchial valves improve lung function and increase exercise tolerance. BLVR treatment is included in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) treatment guidelines for COPD patients without interlobar collateral ventilation. However, BLVR using an endobronchial valve has not been attempted in patients with giant bullae.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report successful and safe BLVR using an endobronchial valve in a patient with a huge bullous emphysema in the right middle lobe. A 65-year-old male was diagnosed with COPD 5 years prior and had a large bullae in the right middle lobe at that time. During regular follow-up, the symptoms of respiratory distress gradually worsened, and the size of the bullae gradually increased on computed tomography (CT). Therefore, we decided to treat the patient via BLVR using an unidirectional endobronchial valve. The Chartis system (Pulmonx, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) confirmed the absence of collateral ventilation of the right middle lobe. We successfully inserted an endobronchial valve into the right middle bronchus. After insertion, the bullae decreased dramatically in size, and the patient's symptoms and quality of life improved markedly.

CONCLUSION

This case supports recent suggestions that BLVR can serve as a good alternative treatment for appropriately selected patients.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: recent updates

Emphysema causes significant morbidity and mortality, incurring both financial and psychosocial costs. Alternatives to medical therapy and surgical lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) have increased interest in bronchoscopic techniques. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is still in its infancy and additional trials and follow-up are critical. However, several new randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated improvement in lung function, quality of life and exercise capacity in select patients receiving endobronchial valves and coil therapy. This article highlights recent data regarding bronchoscopic treatment of emphysema.