1
|
Panettieri RA, Chipps BE, Skolnik N, George M, Murphy K, Lugogo N. The Use of Albuterol/Budesonide as Reliever Therapy to Reduce Asthma Exacerbations. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:882-888. [PMID: 38316182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Prevention of asthma exacerbations and reduction of systemic corticosteroid burden remain unmet needs in asthma. US asthma guidelines recommend concomitant short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as an alternative reliever at step 2. The Food and Drug Administration approved a pressurized metered-dose inhaler containing albuterol and budesonide for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and for reducing exacerbation risk in patients with asthma aged ≥18 years. This combination is approved for use as a reliever with or without maintenance therapy, but it is not indicated for maintenance therapy (or for single maintenance and reliever therapy). Intervening with as-needed SABA-ICS during the window of opportunity to reduce inflammation during loss of asthma control can reduce exacerbation risk, by exerting both genomic and nongenomic anti-inflammatory effects. We propose that the use of albuterol-budesonide rather than albuterol as a reliever to manage episodic symptoms driven by acute bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation can improve outcomes. This combination approach, shown to decrease asthma exacerbations and oral corticosteroid burden in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, represents a paradigm shift for asthma treatment in the United States. Further safety and efficacy studies should provide evidence that this type of reliever should be standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reynold A Panettieri
- Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Child Health Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Bradley E Chipps
- Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, Calif.
| | - Neil Skolnik
- Abington Family Medicine, Jenkintown, Pa; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Maureen George
- Department of Nursing, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
| | - Kevin Murphy
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Section of Adult and Pediatric Allergy and Pediatric Pulmonary, Boys Town, Neb
| | - Njira Lugogo
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bali V, Schelfhout J, Sher MR, Tripathi Peters A, Patel GB, Mayorga M, Goss D, Romano C(D. Patient-reported experiences with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a qualitative analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2024; 18:17534666241236025. [PMID: 38501735 PMCID: PMC10953008 DOI: 10.1177/17534666241236025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic cough, defined as a cough lasting 8 or more weeks, affects up to 10% of adults. Refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a cough that is uncontrolled despite comprehensive investigation and treatment of comorbid conditions while unexplained chronic cough (UCC) is a cough with no identifiable cause despite extensive evaluation of comorbid conditions. RCC and UCC are often poorly controlled. Understanding individuals' lived experience of the symptoms and impacts of these conditions may guide therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this study were to assess respondents' perceptions of the key symptoms of RCC and UCC and the impacts of RCC and UCC and their symptoms on well-being, health-related quality of life, work productivity, and social relationships. DESIGN Qualitative study. METHODS This study enrolled 30 adults with physician-diagnosed RCC or UCC. Two trained qualitative researchers conducted individual, in-depth telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and systematically analyzed to identify content themes. RESULTS A total of 15 respondents with RCC and 15 with UCC were included in the study. Many respondents had RCC or UCC for a long duration (median 9 years, range: 0-24). Half of the respondents reported having a coughing episode at least once daily. Only 40% of respondents reported that medication had improved their symptoms. In over half of the respondents, RCC or UCC hindered communication, caused embarrassment, frustration, and worry, and lowered quality of life. Perceptions of meaningful treatment benefits in RCC or UCC varied widely across respondents. CONCLUSION RCC and UCC remained poorly managed in many individuals and were associated with a wide range of symptoms and cough triggers that hindered daily activities and reduced emotional well-being. Understanding individuals' lived experiences may inform the development of RCC and UCC therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Bali
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co. Inc., 351 North Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA 19454, USA
| | - Jonathan Schelfhout
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Gayatri B. Patel
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Diana Goss
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Habib B, Buckeridge D, Bustillo M, Marquez SN, Thakur M, Tran T, Weir DL, Tamblyn R. Smart About Meds (SAM): a pilot randomized controlled trial of a mobile application to improve medication adherence following hospital discharge. JAMIA Open 2021; 4:ooab050. [PMID: 34345805 PMCID: PMC8325487 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objectives of this pilot study were (1) to assess the feasibility of a larger evaluation of Smart About Meds (SAM), a patient-centered medication management mobile application, and (2) to evaluate SAM’s potential to improve outcomes of interest, including adherence to medication changes made at hospital discharge and the occurrence of adverse events. Materials and Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among patients discharged from internal medicine units of an academic health center between June 2019 and March 2020. Block randomization was used to randomize patients to intervention (received access to SAM at discharge) or control (received usual care). Patients were followed for 30 days post-discharge, during which app use was recorded. Pharmacy claims data were used to measure adherence to medication changes made at discharge, and physician billing data were used to identify emergency department visits and hospital readmissions during follow-up. Results Forty-nine patients were eligible for inclusion in the study at hospital discharge (23 intervention, 26 control). In the 30 days of post-discharge, 15 (65.2%) intervention patients used the SAM app. During this period, intervention patients adhered to a larger proportion of medication changes (83.7%) than control patients (77.8%), including newly prescribed medications (72.7% vs 61.7%) and dose changes (90.9% vs 81.8%). A smaller proportion of intervention patients (8.7%) were readmitted to hospital during follow-up than control patients (15.4%). Conclusion The high uptake of SAM among intervention patients supports the feasibility of a larger trial. Results also suggest that SAM has the potential to enhance adherence to medication changes and reduce the risk of downstream adverse events. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a larger trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT04676165.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Habib
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - David Buckeridge
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Melissa Bustillo
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Manish Thakur
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Thai Tran
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniala L Weir
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robyn Tamblyn
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Collacott H, Zhang D, Heidenreich S, Tervonen T. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 15:55-68. [PMID: 34250574 PMCID: PMC8738458 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Background Regulators have called for greater emphasis on the role of the patient voice to inform medical product development and decision making, and expert guidelines and reports for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) both explicitly recommend the consideration of patient preferences in the management of these diseases. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are commonly used to quantify stakeholders’ treatment preferences and estimate the trade-offs they are willing to make between outcomes such as treatment benefits and risks. Objective The aim of this systematic literature review is to provide an up-to-date and critical review of DCEs published in asthma and COPD; specifically, we aim to evaluate the subject of preference studies conducted in asthma and COPD, what attributes have been included, stakeholders’ preferences, and the consistency in reporting of instrument development, testing and reporting of results. Methods A systematic review of published DCEs on asthma and COPD treatments was conducted using Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Studies were included if they included a DCE conducted in a relevant population (e.g. patients with asthma or COPD or their caregivers, asthma or COPD-treating clinicians, or the general population), and reported quantitative outcomes on participants’ preferences. Study characteristics were summarised descriptively, and descriptive analyses of attribute categories, consistency in reporting on key criteria, and stakeholder preferences were undertaken. Results A total of 33 eligible studies were identified, including 28 unique DCEs. The majority (n = 20; 71%) of studies were conducted in a patient sample. Studies focused on inhaler treatments, and included attributes in five key categories: symptoms and treatment benefits (n = 23; 82%), treatment convenience (n = 19; 68%), treatment cost (n = 17; 61%), treatment risks (n = 13; 46%), and other (n = 10; 36%). Symptoms and treatment benefits were the attributes most frequently ranked as important to patients (n = 26, 72%), followed by treatment risks (n = 7, 39%). Several studies (n = 9, 32%) did not qualitatively pre-test their DCE, and a majority did not report the uncertainty in estimated outcomes (n = 18; 64%). Conclusions DCEs in asthma and COPD have focused on treatment benefits and convenience, with less evidence generated on participants’ risk tolerance. Quality criteria and reporting standards are needed to promote study quality and ensure consistency in reporting between studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tommi Tervonen
- Evidera, The Ark, 201 Talgarth Rd, London, W6 8BJ, UK.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Damm K, Lingner H, Schmidt K, Aumann-Suslin I, Buhr-Schinner H, van der Meyden J, Schultz K. Preferences of patients with asthma or COPD for treatments in pulmonary rehabilitation. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2021; 11:14. [PMID: 33866476 PMCID: PMC8053281 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-021-00308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) aims to improve disease control in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, the success of PR-programs depends on the patients' participation and willingness to cooperate. Taking the patients' preferences into consideration might improve both of these factors. Accordingly, our study aims to analyze patients' preferences regarding current rehabilitation approaches in order to deduce and discuss possibilities to further optimize pulmonary rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS At the end of a 3 weeks in-house PR, patients' preferences concerning the proposed therapies were assessed during two different time slots (summer 2015 and winter 2015/2016) in three clinics using a choice-based conjoint analysis (CA). Relevant therapy attributes and their levels were identified through literature search and expert interviews. Inclusion criteria were as follows: PR-inpatient with asthma and/or COPD, confirmed diagnosis, age over 18 years, capability to write and read German, written informed consent obtained. The CA analyses comprised a generalized linear mixed-effects model and a latent class mixed logit model. RESULTS A total of 542 persons participated in the survey. The most important attribute was sport and exercise therapy. Rehabilitation preferences hardly differed between asthma and COPD patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as well as time since diagnosis were found to have a significant influence on patients' rehabilitation preferences. CONCLUSIONS Patients in pulmonary rehabilitation have preferences regarding specific program components. To increase the adherence to, and thus, the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs, these results must be considered when developing or optimizing PR-programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Damm
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University of Hanover, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Heidrun Lingner
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
- Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Katharina Schmidt
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University of Hanover, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ines Aumann-Suslin
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University of Hanover, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany
| | - Heike Buhr-Schinner
- Department of Internal Medicine / Pneumology, Ostseeklinik Schönberg-Holm, Ostseebad Schönberg, Germany
| | - Jochen van der Meyden
- Department of Internal Medicine / Pneumology, Klinik Wehrawald der Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte Todtmoos, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Schultz
- Center for Rehabilitation, Pneumology and Orthopaedics, Klinik Bad Reichenhall, Bad Reichenhall, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clark VL, Gibson PG, McDonald VM. What matters to people with severe asthma? Exploring add-on asthma medication and outcomes of importance. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00497-2020. [PMID: 33816596 PMCID: PMC8005593 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00497-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing number of new therapies for severe asthma; however, what outcomes people with severe asthma would like improved and what aspects they prioritise in new medications remain unknown. This study aimed to understand what outcomes are important to patients when prescribed new treatments and to determine the characteristics of importance to patients in their choice of asthma treatments. Participants with severe asthma (n=50) completed a cross-sectional survey that ranked 17 potential hypothetical outcomes of treatment using a seven-point Likert scale, as well as selecting their top five overall outcomes. Participants also completed hypothetical scenarios trading off medication characteristics for four hypothetical add-on asthma treatments. Participants (58% male), had a mean±sd age of 62.2±13.5 years. Their top three prioritised outcomes were: to improve overall quality of life (selected by 83% of people), reduce number and severity of asthma attacks (72.3%), and being able to participate in physical activity (59.6%) When trading off medication characteristics, the majority of patients with severe asthma chose the hypothetical medication with the best treatment efficacy (68%). However, a subgroup of patients prioritised the medication's side-effect profile and mode of delivery to select their preferred medication. People with severe asthma value improved quality of life as an important outcome of treatment. Shared decision-making discussions between clinicians and patients that centre around medication efficacy and side-effect profile can incorporate patient preferences for add-on therapy in severe asthma. Improving quality of life is an important treatment outcome. Shared decision-making discussions between clinicians and patients that centre around efficacy and side-effect profile incorporate patient preferences for add-on therapy in severe asthma.https://bit.ly/2GY1Sc4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Clark
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Severe Asthma and The Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter G Gibson
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Severe Asthma and The Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Vanessa M McDonald
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Severe Asthma and The Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Slejko JF, Hong YD, Sullivan JL, Reed RM, dosReis S. Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 14:569-579. [PMID: 33554310 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00495-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Formative research studies can inform stated-preference instrument development to quantify the importance of various attributes of healthcare treatments. The objective of this study was to elicit from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease the prioritization of an established set of patient-informed value elements. METHODS Using an iterative mixed-methods study design, we engaged individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Phase 1 value element elicitation and Phase 2 language refinement. Study participants were recruited from March to July 2019. Four guided activities, administered in an online instrument, elicited individual preferences for 40 disease-agnostic value elements that were aligned with treatment, outcomes, or care process. Responses from the guided activities were summarized and then presented to a patient advocate and additional patient participants for further refinement of the value elements and the phrasing. RESULTS Twenty-three participants, 18 male and five female, mean age of 66 years (standard deviation = 7) were enrolled in Phase 1. Participant responses informed the selection of eight elements as the key candidates for the Phase 2 language refinement: Side Effects, New Therapeutic Option, Available Treatment, Appropriateness of Care, Predictable Healthcare Needs, Physical Activities: Endurance and Symptom Control, and Explanation of Treatment. With feedback from a patient advocate and additional patient participants, elements were refined, rephrased, or modified and this list was narrowed to six value elements (Side Effects, New Therapeutic Option, Willingness to Pay, Physical Activities, Explanation of Treatment, and Access to Care) to serve as attributes in a conceptual framework for a future quantitative stated-preference instrument. CONCLUSIONS This patient-engaged formative work identified patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease key attributes of value-based decision making that underpin benefit-risk trade-offs between physical endurance, treatment side effects, care access, and cost. This study illustrates an iterative process for eliciting and refining a comprehensive list of value elements, resulting in a subgroup of elements important to a specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia F Slejko
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Room 01-214, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| | - Yoon Duk Hong
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Room 01-214, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | | | - Robert M Reed
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan dosReis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch Street, 12th Floor, Room 01-214, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schroeder M, Hall K, Eliasson L, Bracey S, Gunsoy NB, Macey J, Jones PW, Ismaila AS. Treatment Preferences of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from Qualitative Interviews and Focus Groups in the United Kingdom, United States, and Germany. CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASES (MIAMI, FLA.) 2021; 8:19-30. [PMID: 33150778 PMCID: PMC8047617 DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.8.1.2020.0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A wide range of therapeutic regimens, including single-inhaler triple therapies (SITTs), are now available for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, an improved understanding of patient preferences may be valuable to inform physician prescribing decisions. This study was performed to assess the factors considered by patients when making decisions about their COPD treatments using qualitative techniques. METHODS In the United Kingdom, United States and Germany, individual qualitative interviews (n=10 per country) and focus groups (1 per country; [United Kingdom, n=4; United States, n=6; Germany, n=6 participants]) were conducted. Interviews and focus groups were semi‑structured, lasting approximately 60 minutes, and focused on treatment preferences. Data were analyzed according to emerging themes identified from the interviews; qualitative thematic analysis of the data was performed using specialist software. RESULTS In interviews and focus groups, efficacy, ease of use, and lower frequency of use were favored attributes for current treatment, while side effects, medication taste, and more complex administration techniques were key dislikes. In interviews, most participants would consider a switch in medication, mainly for improved efficacy, but also to reduce medication frequency or following physician advice. Overall, efficacy and ease of use were the 2 most important attributes reported in interviews in all 3 countries. CONCLUSION Patients with COPD have preferences for certain attributes of medication, highlighting the multi-faceted nature of treatment effectiveness and the importance of the delivery device.These results were subsequently used to inform the design of a discrete choice experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Schroeder
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Hall
- Patient Centred Outcomes, ICON plc., London, United Kingdom
| | - Lina Eliasson
- Patient Centred Outcomes, ICON plc., London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophia Bracey
- Patient Centred Outcomes, ICON plc., Abingdon, United Kingdom
| | - Necdet B. Gunsoy
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jake Macey
- Patient Centred Outcomes, ICON plc., Abingdon, United Kingdom
| | - Paul W. Jones
- Global Respiratory Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, United Kingdom
| | - Afisi S. Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tervonen T, Hawken N, Hanania NA, Martinez FJ, Heidenreich S, Gilbert I. Maintenance inhaler therapy preferences of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment. Thorax 2020; 75:735-743. [PMID: 32631932 PMCID: PMC7476258 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of maintenance inhaler therapies are available to treat asthma and COPD. Patient-centric treatment choices require understanding patient preferences for the alternative therapies. METHODS A self-completed web-based discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit patient preferences for inhaler device and medication attributes. Selection of attributes was informed by patient focus groups and literature review. RESULTS The discrete choice experiment was completed by 810 patients with asthma and 1147 patients with COPD. Patients with asthma most valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min, followed by reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Patients with COPD most and equally valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min and reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Both patients with asthma and patients with COPD were willing to accept an additional exacerbation in exchange for a 15 min decrease in onset of action and a longer onset of action in exchange for a lower risk of adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroids. Patients with asthma and COPD valued once-daily over twice-daily dosing, pressurised inhalers over dry powder inhalers and non-capsule priming over single-use capsules, although these attributes were not valued as highly as faster onset of action or reduced exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS The most important maintenance inhaler attributes for patients with asthma and COPD were fast onset of symptom relief and a lower rate of exacerbations. Concerns about safety of inhaled corticosteroids and device convenience also affected patient preferences but were less important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommi Tervonen
- Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, Cornell University, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baggott C, Hansen P, Hancox RJ, Hardy JK, Sparks J, Holliday M, Weatherall M, Beasley R, Reddel HK, Fingleton J. What matters most to patients when choosing treatment for mild-moderate asthma? Results from a discrete choice experiment. Thorax 2020; 75:842-848. [PMID: 32719055 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An as-needed combination preventer and reliever regimen was recently introduced as an alternative to conventional daily preventer treatment for mild asthma. In a subgroup analysis of the PRACTICAL study, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of budesonide-formoterol reliever therapy versus maintenance budesonide plus terbutaline reliever therapy in adults with mild asthma, we recently reported that about two-thirds preferred as-needed combination preventer and reliever therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the relative importance of attributes associated with these two asthma therapies in this subgroup of participants who indicated their preferred treatment in the PRACTICAL study. METHODS At their final study visit, a subgroup of participants indicated their preferred treatment and completed a discrete choice experiment using the Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives method and 1000minds software. Treatment attributes and their levels were selected from measurable study outcomes, and included: treatment regimen, shortness of breath, steroid dose and likelihood of asthma flare-up. RESULTS The final analysis dataset included 288 participants, 64% of whom preferred as-needed combination preventer and reliever. Of the attributes, no shortness of breath and lowest risk of asthma flare-up were ranked highest and second highest, respectively. However, the relative importance of the other two attributes varied by preferred therapy: treatment regimen was ranked higher by participants who preferred as-needed treatment than by participants who preferred maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of patient preferences for treatment attributes together with regimen characteristics can be used in shared decision-making regarding choice of treatment for patients with mild-moderate asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12616000377437.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Baggott
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Paul Hansen
- Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Robert J Hancox
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Respiratory Medicine, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand
| | - Jo Katherine Hardy
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jenny Sparks
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Mark Holliday
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Mark Weatherall
- Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Richard Beasley
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,Respiratory Medicine, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen K Reddel
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Fingleton
- Asthma Programme, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,Respiratory Medicine, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gangemi A, Kim V, Criner G. Customer is always right: optimising inhaler design to fit patient preferences in obstructive lung disease. Thorax 2020; 75:711-712. [PMID: 32631931 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Gangemi
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Victor Kim
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gerard Criner
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsiligianni I, Kocks JWH. Daytime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2020; 30:6. [PMID: 32081967 PMCID: PMC7035364 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-020-0163-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There is no single source of compiled data on symptoms experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when awake and active throughout the day. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence, variability, and burden (i.e., bothersomeness and/or intensity), and the impact of daytime COPD symptoms on other outcomes. The review also evaluated the impact of interventions and the measures/tools used to assess daytime COPD symptoms in patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using the primary search terms "COPD", "symptoms", and "daytime" in EMBASE®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE® In-Process, and CENTRAL in 2016, followed by an additional search in 2018 to capture any new literature that was published since the last search. Fifty-six articles were included in the review. The accumulated evidence indicated that the symptomatic burden of COPD appears greatest in the morning, particularly upon waking, and that these morning symptoms have a substantial impact on patients' ability to function normally through the day; they also worsen quality of life. A wide variety of tools were used to evaluate symptoms across the studies. The literature also confirmed the importance of pharmacotherapy in the management of daytime COPD symptoms, and in helping normalize daily functioning. More research is needed to better understand how COPD symptoms impact daily functioning and to evaluate COPD symptoms at well-defined periods throughout the day, using validated and uniform measures/tools. This will help clinicians to better define patients' needs and take appropriate action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|