Evaluating S100B as a serum biomarker for central neurosarcoidosis

Beyond biopsy for neurosarcoidosis: A review of blood and CSF biomarkers

Neurosarcoidosis, a rare granulomatous disease, causes inflammation and damage to the central nervous system (CNS). A major diagnostic challenge in neurosarcoidosis is the absence of well-defined biomarkers. The need for biopsy to make the diagnosis can lead to delays and misdiagnosis if histopathology is inaccessible or indeterminate, highlighting the need for more accessible diagnostic indicators. The current gold standard for a "definite" neurosarcoidosis diagnosis requires biopsy of CNS tissue revealing non-caseating granulomas. However, such biopsies are inherently invasive and carry associated procedural risks. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, is recognized as a poor biomarker for neurosarcoidosis due to its lack of accuracy in the context of CNS involvement. Furthermore, imaging in neurosarcoidosis, while widely utilized and important for narrowing the diagnosis, lacks specificity. Decades of research have yielded molecular and immunologic biomarkers-soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), serum amyloid A1, the CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)-that hold potential for improving diagnostic accuracy. However, these biomarkers are not yet established in clinical care as they may be difficult to obtain and are derived from small studies. They also suffer from a lack of specificity against other inflammatory and infectious central nervous system diseases. New biomarkers are needed for use alongside those previously discovered to improve diagnosis of this rare disease. This review synthesizes existing literature on neurosarcoidosis biomarkers, aiming to establish a foundation for further research in this evolving field. It also consolidates information on biomarkers of systemic sarcoidosis such as IL-8 and soluble CD40L that have not yet been studied in neurosarcoidosis but hold potential as markers of CNS disease.

Neurosarcoidosis and Neurologic Complications of Sarcoidosis Treatment

Sarcoidosis is an immune-mediated multisystem granulomatous disorder. Neurosarcoidosis (NS) accounts for 5% to 35% of cases. The diagnostic evaluation of NS can be a clinical challenge. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard to evaluate central nervous system NS. In almost all cases treatment is warranted. Although glucocorticoids remain the first-line therapy in patients with sarcoidosis, in NS timely initiation of second- or third-line treatment is strongly recommended. Of these, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors are the most promising. However, the treatment itself may be responsible for/associated with developing neurologic symptoms mimicking NS. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility of drug-induced neurologic symptoms in sarcoidosis.

The association between inflammatory markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroinflammatory processes have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of psychiatric and neurological diseases. Studies on this topic often rely on analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood. Unfortunately, the extent to which these peripheral markers reflect inflammatory processes in the central nervous system (CNS) is unclear.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and found 29 studies examining the association between inflammatory marker levels in blood and cerebrospinal (CSF) samples. We performed a random effects meta-analysis of 21 studies (pooled n = 1679 paired samples) that reported the correlation of inflammatory markers in paired blood-CSF samples.

RESULTS

A qualitative review revealed moderate to high quality of included studies with the majority of studies reporting no significant correlation of inflammatory markers between paired blood-CSF. Meta-analyses revealed a significant low pooled correlation between peripheral and CSF biomarkers (r = 0.21). Meta-analyses of individual cytokines revealed a significant pooled correlation for IL-6 (r = 0.26) and TNFα (r = 0.3) after excluding outlier studies, but not for other cytokines. Sensitivity analyses showed that correlations were highest among participants with a median age above 50 (r = 0.46) and among autoimmune disorder patients (r = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed poor correlation between peripheral and central inflammatory markers in paired blood-CSF samples, with increased correlations in certain study populations. Based on the current findings, peripheral inflammatory markers are a poor reflection of the neuroinflammatory profile.

New progress with calcium-binding protein S100A16 in digestive system disease

INTRODUCTION

This review summarizes and analyzes the abnormal expression and mechanism of S100A16 in digestive system diseases, which is expected to provide new ideas and methods for adjuvant treatment and prognosis evaluation of digestive system diseases.

AREAS COVERED

Based on original publications found in database systems (PubMed, Cochrane), we introduce the mechanism and research progress of S100A16 in digestive system tumors, inflammatory bowel disease and fatty liver.

EXPERT OPINION

S100A16 is closely related to the proliferation, migration, and invasion of digestive system tumor cells. Further, it plays an important role in inflammatory bowel disease and fatty liver.

A prospective, one-year follow-up study of patients newly diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis

METHODS

Twenty patients with newly diagnosed neurosarcoidosis were examined for multiple outcomes in an observational cohort study with 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The patients' contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI scans reduced during treatment (p < 0.0001). The mean modified Rankin Score improved from 3.0 to 1.8 (p < 0.0001), and 75% of patients experienced clinically important improvement. Patients improved on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (p < 0.0001) and on SF-36 Physical (p = 0.003) and Mental Component Summary scores (p = 0.03). Proportions of patients with substantial fatigue (75%) and high depression score (35%) were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

12-month immunosuppression improved several outcomes, and 75% of patients experienced clinically important improvement.

S100B as a biomarker of blood-brain barrier disruption after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of the peripheral inflammatory response to cardiovascular surgery is associated with increases in blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability as reflected by changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/plasma S100B concentrations.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of 35 patients undergoing elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with (n = 17) or without (n = 18) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Plasma and CSF S100B, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and albumin concentrations were measured at baseline (C₀) and serially for up to five days.

RESULTS

Following CPB, the median [interquartile range] plasma S100B concentration increased from 58 [32-88] pg·mL^-1 at C₀ to a maximum concentration (C_max) of 1,131 [655-1,875] pg·mL^-1 over a median time (t_max) of 6.3 [5.9-7.0] hr. In the non-CPB group, the median plasma S100B increased to a lesser extent. There was a delayed increase in CSF S100B to a median C_max of 436 [406-922] pg·mL^-1 in the CPB group at a t_max of 23.7 [18.5-40.2] hr. In the non-CPB group, the CSF concentrations were similar at all time points. In the CPB group, we did not detect significant correlations between plasma and CSF S100B with plasma IL-6 [r = 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.061 to 0.84)] and CSF IL-6 [r = 0.53 (95% CI, -0.073 to 0.85)] concentrations, respectively. Correlations of plasma or CSF S100B levels with BBB permeability were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The lack of parallel increases in plasma and CSF S100B following CPB indicates that S100B may not be a reliable biomarker for BBB disruption after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair employing CPB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00878371); registered 7 April 2009.

Elevated Neurofilament Light Chain in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma Reflect Inflammatory MRI Activity in Neurosarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Damage to axonal cells releases neurofilament light chain (NFL) into the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. The objective of this study was to investigate NFL as a potential biomarker of disease activity in neurosarcoidosis. MRIs were graded according to enhancing lesions at different central nervous system (CNS) sites.

RESULTS

In cerebrospinal fluid, levels of NFL were higher in neurosarcoidosis patients (n = 20) median 2304 pg/mL (interquartile range (IQR) 630-19,612) compared to 426 pg/mL (IQR 261-571) in extra-neurologic sarcoidosis patients (n = 20) and 336 pg/mL (IQR 194-402) in healthy controls (n = 11) (p = 0.0002). In plasma, levels of NFL were higher in neurosarcoidosis patients median 28.2 pg/mL (IQR 11.5-49.3) compared to 6.2 pg/mL (IQR 4.3-8.2) in extra-neurologic sarcoidosis patients and 7.1 pg/mL (IQR 6.2-9.0) in healthy controls (p = 0.0001). Levels in both cerebrospinal fluid and plasma were higher in neurosarcoidosis patients with moderate/severe enhancement than patients with mild enhancement on MRI (p = 0.009 and p = 0.005, respectively). To distinguish neurosarcoidosis patients from extra-neurologic patients and healthy controls, a cut-off level of 630 pg/mL in cerebrospinal fluid had 94% specificity and 79% sensitivity, while a cut-off level of 11.4 pg/mL in plasma had 97% specificity and 75% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

NFL levels in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma are significantly higher in neurosarcoidosis patients compared to extra-neurologic patients and healthy controls, and the levels correlate to the extent of inflammation on MRI.

Potential use of biomarkers for the clinical evaluation of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology and pathogenesis with a heterogeneous clinical presentation. In the appropriate clinical and radiological context and with the exclusion of other diagnoses, the disease is characterized by the pathological presence of non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Sarcoidosis is postulated to be a multifactorial disease caused by chronic antigenic stimulation. The immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis encompasses a complex interaction between the host, genetic factors and postulated environmental and infectious triggers, which result in granuloma development.The exact pathogenesis of the disease has yet to be elucidated, but some of the inflammatory pathways that play a key role in disease progression and outcomes are becoming apparent, and these may form the logical basis for selecting potential biomarkers.Biomarkers are biological molecules that are altered pathologically. To date, there exists no single reliable biomarker for the evaluation of sarcoidosis, either diagnostically or prognostically but new candidates are emerging. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis ideally requires a biopsy confirming non-caseating granulomas, but the likelihood of progression that requires intervention remains unpredictable. These challenging aspects could be potentially resolved by incorporating biomarkers into clinical practice for both diagnosis and monitoring disease activity.This review outlines the current knowledge on sarcoidosis with an emphasis on pulmonary sarcoidosis, and delineates the understanding surrounding the implication of biomarkers for the clinical evaluation of sarcoidosis.

Calcium-Dependent Translocation of S100B Is Facilitated by Neurocalcin Delta

S100B is a calcium-binding protein that governs calcium-mediated responses in a variety of cells—especially neuronal and glial cells. It is also extensively investigated as a potential biomarker for several disease conditions, especially neurodegenerative ones. In order to establish S100B as a viable pharmaceutical target, it is critical to understand its mechanistic role in signaling pathways and its interacting partners. In this report, we provide evidence to support a calcium-regulated interaction between S100B and the neuronal calcium sensor protein, neurocalcin delta both in vitro and in living cells. Membrane overlay assays were used to test the interaction between purified proteins in vitro and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays, for interactions in living cells. Added calcium is essential for interaction in vitro; however, in living cells, calcium elevation causes translocation of the NCALD-S100B complex to the membrane-rich, perinuclear trans-Golgi network in COS7 cells, suggesting that the response is independent of specialized structures/molecules found in neuronal/glial cells. Similar results are also observed with hippocalcin, a closely related paralog; however, the interaction appears less robust in vitro. The N-terminal region of NCALD and HPCA appear to be critical for interaction with S100B based on in vitro experiments. The possible physiological significance of this interaction is discussed.

Peripheral Blood S100B Levels in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The S100 calcium-binding protein beta subunit (S100B) protein, which mostly exists in the central nervous system, is commonly noted as a marker of neuronal damage. We conducted the first systematic review with meta-analysis to compare peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD with those in healthy controls. A systematic search was carried out for studies published before May 5, 2020. In total, this meta-analysis involved ten studies with 822 participants and 451 cases. The meta-analysis revealed that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.41–1.53; p < 0.001]. Peripheral blood S100B levels may have potential as a useful biomarker for ASD.

The Burden of Neurosarcoidosis: Essential Approaches to Early Diagnosis and Treatment

Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is an often severe, destructive manifestation with a likely under-reported prevalence of 5 to 15% of sarcoidosis cases, and in its active phase demands timely treatment intervention. Clinical signs and symptoms of NS are variable and wide-ranging, depending on anatomical involvement. Cranial nerve dysfunction, cerebrospinal parenchymal disease, aseptic meningitis, and leptomeningeal disease are the most commonly recognized manifestations. However, non-organ-specific potentially neurologically driven symptoms, such as fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and small fiber neuropathy, appear frequently.Heterogeneous clinical presentations and absence of any single conclusive test or biomarker render NS, and sarcoidosis itself, a challenging definitive diagnosis. Clinical suspicion of NS warrants a thorough systemic and neurologic evaluation hopefully resulting in supportive extraneural physical exam and/or tissue findings. Treatment targets the severity of the manifestation, with careful discernment of whether NS reflects active potentially reversible inflammatory granulomatous disease versus inactive postinflammatory damage whereby functional impairment is unlikely to be pharmacologically responsive. Non-organ-specific symptoms are poorly understood, challenging in deciphering reversibility and often identified too late to respond to conventional immunosuppressive/pharmacological treatment. Physical therapy, coping strategies, and stress reduction may benefit patients with all disease activity levels of NS.This publication provides an approach to screening, diagnosis, disease activity discernment, and pharmacological as well as nonpharmacological treatment interventions to reduce disability and protect health-related quality of life in NS.