Efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for connective tissue diseases and complications

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be effective in treating connective tissue disease and associated organ damage, leveraging their anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. Moreover, MSCs may possess the ability to produce antiapoptotic, proliferative, growth, angiogenic, and antifibrotic factors. Among MSCs, adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) stand out for their relative ease of harvesting and abundance. Additionally, studies have indicated that compared with bone marrow-derived MSCs, ASCs have superior immunomodulatory, proangiogenic, antiapoptotic, and antioxidative properties. However, relatively few reviews have focused on the efficacy of ASC therapy in treating connective tissue disease (CTD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Therefore, this review aims to evaluate evidence from preclinical studies that investigate the effectiveness of MSC therapy, specifically ASC therapy, in managing CTD and ILD. Moreover, we explore the outcomes of documented clinical trials. We also introduce an innovative approach involving the utilization of pharmacologically primed ASCs in the CTD model to address the current challenges associated with ASC therapy.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of nintedanib starting dose in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyse whether initiating nintedanib treatment at a reduced dose could improve the treatment continuation rate while maintaining efficacy in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated interstitial lung disease.

METHOD

In total, 51 patients (age 61.6 ± 13.2 years; 38 women, 13 men) were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Secondary endpoints included changes in drug dosage, efficacy evaluated based on annual changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), and safety assessed based on the frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients who started treatment at the standard dose of 300 mg (standard dosage group) were compared with 33 patients who started treatment at a reduced dose (reduced dosage group). Systemic sclerosis was the most common CTD (n = 32), followed by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and, rarely, rheumatoid arthritis. Both groups exhibited comparable cumulative discontinuation rates due to adverse events and similar frequencies of adverse events. No significant differences were observed in maintenance doses between the two groups; however, patients in the reduced dosage group had a lower cumulative dose for up to 52 weeks than those in the standard dosage group. No significant differences were observed in changes in FVC between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence for a difference between the two groups in terms of discontinuation rates, efficacy, and safety. To provide further evidence, future studies using more precise dose-escalation protocols are warranted.

Effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a real-world cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung diseases (RA-ILD).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified RA-ILD patients initiating antifibrotics at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, a large multi-hospital healthcare system in Boston, MA, USA. We used electronic query to identify all patients with at least 2 RA diagnosis codes and a prescription for either nintedanib or pirfenidone (2014-2023). All analyzed patients met 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for RA and had definite RA-ILD according to Bongartz criteria. Data regarding pulmonary function test (PFT) results, adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and clinical data were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare the within-patient trajectory of the percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) within 18-months before to 18-months after antifibrotic initiation among those with these PFT data. Lung transplant-free survival and drug retention was estimated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent baseline factors associated with lung transplant or mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed 74 patients with RA-ILD that initiated antifibrotics (mean age 67.8 years, 53 % male); 40 patients initiated nintedanib and 34 initiated pirfenidone. Median follow-up was 89 weeks (min 4, max 387). There was a significant improvement in the estimated slope of FVCpp after antifibrotic initiation (-0.3 % per year after initiation compared to -6.2 % per year before antifibrotic initiation, p = 0.03). Nintedanib and pirfenidone had similar FVCpp trajectory. Twenty-six patients (35 %) died and 4 (5 %) had undergone lung transplantation during follow-up. Male sex and heavy smoking were each associated with the composite outcome of lung transplant or mortality. AEs were reported in 41 (55 %) patients, with gastrointestinal (GI) AEs being most common (n = 30). The initial antifibrotic was discontinued in 34 (46 %) patients mostly due to GI AEs (n = 19). The median drug retention time was 142 weeks (95 %CI 56, 262) with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

In this first real-world study of antifibrotic use dedicated to RA-ILD, antifibrotic initiation was associated with a modestly improved trajectory of FVCpp. AEs were frequently reported, particularly GI, and discontinuation was common. However, lung transplant and mortality rates were still high, emphasizing the need for further therapeutic strategies in patients with severe RA-ILD. These real-world data complement previous trial data that investigated efficacy and safety.

Antifibrotic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a common extra-articular clinical manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that has negative impacts on morbidity and mortality. In addition, there has been no proven treatment for RA-ILD to date. Thus, we planned a meta-analysis of a literature search to confirm the clinical effects of antifibrotic agents in RA-ILD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted the literature search in Ovid MEDLIVE® databases, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE, and KoreaMed and identified references elucidating the role of nintedanib or pirfenidone in adult patients with RA-ILD. Among the identified studies, those with comparative interventions, complete results of clinical trials, and available full text were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the effect of the antifibrotic agent on disease progression in RA-ILD patients assessed with a mean difference in the change of forced vital capacity (FVC) and the proportion of patients with an increase in percent predicted FVC of 10% or more over 52 weeks. Analysis for heterogeneity was assessed through I2 statistics. Meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed on changes in FVC.

RESULTS

A total of 153 articles were identified through database searches, of which 28 were excluded because of duplication. After additional screening, 109 studies were selected with full text and two articles qualified for analysis according to the set inclusion and exclusion criteria. As a result, two randomized controlled studies were selected, comparing nintedanib and pirfenidone to placebo, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed that antifibrotic agents showed a significant reduction in FVC decline compared to placebo in patients with RA-ILD (mean difference, 88.30; 95% CI, 37.10-139.50). Additionally, there were significantly fewer patients experienced an increase in percent predicted FVC of 10% or more in the antifibrotic agent group compared to the placebo group (Odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.19-0.95, p = 0.04). There was no significant heterogeneity between the two included studies (χ2 = 0.35, p = 0.0007, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis suggests that nintedanib and pirfenidone may have clinical utility in reducing disease progression in patients with RA-ILD. Further research is needed to confirm the clinical benefits of antifibrotic agents in RA-ILD.