1
|
Ingvarsson S, Hasson H, von Thiele Schwarz U, Nilsen P, Powell BJ, Lindberg C, Augustsson H. Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review. Implement Sci 2022; 17:73. [PMID: 36303219 PMCID: PMC9615304 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of low-value care (LVC) is a persistent problem that calls for knowledge about strategies for de-implementation. However, studies are dispersed across many clinical fields, and there is no overview of strategies that can be used to support the de-implementation of LVC. The extent to which strategies used for implementation are also used in de-implementing LVC is unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to (1) identify strategies for the de-implementation of LVC described in the scientific literature and (2) compare de-implementation strategies to implementation strategies as specified in the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) and strategies added by Perry et al. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted according to recommendations outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. Four scientific databases were searched, relevant articles were snowball searched, and the journal Implementation Science was searched manually for peer-reviewed journal articles in English. Articles were included if they were empirical studies of strategies designed to reduce the use of LVC. Two reviewers conducted all abstract and full-text reviews, and conflicting decisions were discussed until consensus was reached. Data were charted using a piloted data-charting form. The strategies were first coded inductively and then mapped onto the ERIC compilation of implementation strategies. RESULTS The scoping review identified a total of 71 unique de-implementation strategies described in the literature. Of these, 62 strategies could be mapped onto ERIC strategies, and four strategies onto one added category. Half (50%) of the 73 ERIC implementation strategies were used for de-implementation purposes. Five identified de-implementation strategies could not be mapped onto any of the existing strategies in ERIC. CONCLUSIONS Similar strategies are used for de-implementation and implementation. However, only a half of the implementation strategies included in the ERIC compilation were represented in the de-implementation studies, which may imply that some strategies are being underused or that they are not applicable for de-implementation purposes. The strategies assess and redesign workflow (a strategy previously suggested to be added to ERIC), accountability tool, and communication tool (unique new strategies for de-implementation) could complement the existing ERIC compilation when used for de-implementation purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ingvarsson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
| | - Henna Hasson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- Unit for implementation and evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Public Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA
| | - Clara Lindberg
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
| | - Hanna Augustsson
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska, Sweden
- Unit for implementation and evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei G, Wu M, Zhu H, Han S, Chen J, Zhai C, Shi L. Off-Label Use of Antineoplastic Drugs to Treat Malignancies: Evidence From China Based on a Nationwide Medical Insurance Data Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:616453. [PMID: 33897416 PMCID: PMC8060556 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.616453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Off-label (OL) use of antineoplastic drugs to treat malignancies is prevalent. In this study, we quantified and characterized OL use of antineoplastic drugs to treat malignancies in China. Methods: This was a retrospective study using nationwide data collected from 2008 to 2010. Use of antineoplastic drugs was considered OL if they were used for indications not reflected in the package insert published by the National Medical Products Administration at the time of prescription. Descriptive analysis and Spearman rank correlation were used to evaluate the frequency and pattern of OL drug use. Results: In total, 51,382 patients with malignancies, 24 categories of antineoplastic drugs, and 77 types of malignancies treated with OL drugs were included in this study. Twenty commonly used antineoplastic drugs (ICD encoded as L01) were used OL in 10-61% of cases, and four commonly used endocrine therapy antineoplastic drugs (ICD encoded as L02) were used OL in 10-19% of cases. There was a significant negative correlation between the disease constituent ratio and the average OL use rate of antineoplastic drugs for various malignancies. In contrast, there was a significant positive correlation between the average OL use rate of antineoplastic drugs and the number of malignancies treated with OL drugs. Conclusion: This study provided information regarding OL use of antineoplastic drugs for treatment of malignancies, and showed that OL use was prevalent. In addition, uncommon malignancies were more likely to be treated with OL antineoplastic drugs. Furthermore, more commonly used antineoplastic drugs were more likely to be used OL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoxu Wei
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Min Wu
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - He Zhu
- International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Sheng Han
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chenchen Zhai
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Luwen Shi
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vega A, Zhang R, Wong HL, Wernecke M, Alexander M, Feng Y, Lo AC, Lufkin B, Ryan Q, Izem R, MaCurdy TE, Kelman JA, Graham DJ. Trends in Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use and blood transfusions for chemotherapy-induced anemia throughout FDA's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy lifecycle. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2021; 30:626-635. [PMID: 33534188 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), indicated for treating some patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA), may increase the risk of tumor progression and mortality. FDA required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to mitigate these risks. We assessed REMS impact on ESA administration and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion as surrogate metrics for REMS effectiveness. METHODS Retrospective cohort study including data from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2018 for beneficiaries ≥65 years enrolled in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Parts A/B with a cancer diagnosis; patients with other indications for ESA use were excluded. Study time was divided into five periods demarcated by issuance of CMS National Coverage Determination (NCD) (Pre-NCD, Pre-REMS) and REMS milestones (Grace Period, REMS, post-REMS). Study outcomes were monthly proportion of chemotherapy episodes (CTEs) with concomitant ESA administration, with post-CTE ESA administration, and with RBC transfusions. RESULTS Of 1 778 855 beneficiaries treated with CT, 308742 received concomitant ESA for CIA. The proportion of CTEs with concomitant and post-CTE ESA administration decreased Pre-REMS (9.0 percentage points [pp] and 3.5 pp, respectively). There were no significant post-REMS changes in the proportion of CTEs with concomitant (0.0 pp) and post-CTE ESA administration (0.1 pp). Fluctuation in RBC transfusions was <4 pp throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS Medicare beneficiaries showed a substantive decrease in ESA administration after NCD, with minimal impact by the REMS and its removal. Small changes in RBC transfusion over the study period were likely due to a national secular trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amarilys Vega
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Rongmei Zhang
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Yuhui Feng
- Acumen, LLC, Burlingame, California, USA
| | - An-Chi Lo
- Acumen, LLC, Burlingame, California, USA
| | | | - Qin Ryan
- Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Rima Izem
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
| | - Thomas E MaCurdy
- Acumen, LLC, Burlingame, California, USA.,Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Kelman
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - David J Graham
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanni KA, Truong CB, Almahasis S, Qian J. Safety of Marketed Cancer Supportive Care Biosimilars in the US: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database. BioDrugs 2021; 35:239-254. [PMID: 33439472 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00466-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the approval and availability of the first biosimilar in 2015 in the United States (US), evidence regarding the post-marketing safety of cancer supportive care biosimilars remains limited. OBJECTIVE The aim was to explore the adverse event (AE) reporting patterns and detect disproportionate reporting signals for cancer supportive care biosimilars in the US compared to their originator biologics. METHODS The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database (January 1, 2004-March 31, 2020) was used to identify AE reports for filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and epoetin alpha by type of product (originator biologics vs. biosimilars) and report characteristics. Plots of AE reports against years were used to reveal the reporting patterns. Disproportionality analyses using reporting odds ratios (RORs) were conducted to detect differences in serious and specific AEs between studied drugs and all other drugs. Breslow-Day tests were used to determine homogeneity between the originator biologic-biosimilar pair RORs for the same AE. RESULTS Total numbers of AEs for all studied biosimilars increased after marketing. More AE reports were from female patients for all of the studied drugs. More AEs for originator biologics and filgrastim biosimilar were reported by health professionals, while the highest proportion of reports came from consumers for pegfilgrastim and epoetin alpha biosimilars (29% and 44.1%, respectively). Signals of disproportionate reporting in serious AEs were detected for a pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Fulphila®) compared to its originator biologic. CONCLUSION Our findings support the similarity in the signals of disproportionate reporting between cancer supportive care originator biologics and biosimilars, except for Fulphila®.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaniz Afroz Tanni
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Cong Bang Truong
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Sura Almahasis
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang J, Lin W, Chen Y. Off-label use of tamoxifen in a Chinese tertiary care hospital. Int J Clin Pharm 2019; 41:555-562. [PMID: 30680514 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-019-00788-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Tamoxifen is an estrogen receptor modulator used for the treatment of breast cancer; however, currently, it is used in many off-label indications. Objective To investigate the prevalence of tamoxifen off-label prescribing and explore available scientific evidence that supports those uses in outpatients. Setting Xiamen maternity and child health care hospital in Xiamen city of China. Method All the prescriptions of outpatients receiving tamoxifen were exported from an electronic prescribing system during a 1-year period. Tamoxifen use was then classified as either on- or off-label according to the criteria we established previously, and the details of the off-label prescriptions were collected. Logistic regression was applied to explore predictive variables. Evidence search was limited to Up-To-Date, the Micromedex database and PubMed. Main outcome measure The rate of off-label use, risk factors identified by logistic regression and evidence exhibition. Results A total of 75% of all the prescriptions available were classified as off-label use. Hyperplasia of the breast was the most frequently prescribed off-label indication. According to the analysis of logistic regression, male patients, patients less than 34 years old, and physicians with a higher professional title were more likely associated with off-label prescribing. After a search in Up-To-Date, the Micromedex database and PubMed, only male infertility, atypical hyperplasia, mastodynia, peripheral precocious puberty and gynecomastia were found to have strong evidence supporting the use of tamoxifen off-label (22.75%). Conclusion Although the off-label use of tamoxifen was common in our hospital, there was a relative shortage of evidence available supporting those uses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhui Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 10 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian Province, China.
| | - Wubin Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 10 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 10 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|