Acid-base accounting assessment of mine wastes using the chromium reducible sulfur method

Passivation of pyrite for reduced rates of acid and metalliferous drainage using readily available mineralogic and organic carbon resources: A laboratory mine waste study

Acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD) is a major environmental issue resulting largely from exposure to weathering of mine wastes containing pyrite (FeS₂). At-source strategies to reduce the rate of formation of AMD have potential to be more cost-effective and sustainable than post-generation downstream treatments. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of geochemical and microbial treatments for at-source control through pyrite surface passivation. Six kinetic leach columns (KLCs), using a mine waste containing 3.8 wt% pyrite, were subjected to various treatments: 1) untreated, 2) blended calcite, and applications of 3) calcite-saturated water, 4) lime-saturated water followed by calcite-saturated water, 5) biosolids extract water (providing a source of organic carbon to promote microbial growth) and 6) biosolids extract in calcite-saturated water. The untreated KLC leachate pH was on average 5.7 for the first 12 weeks, followed by a gradual decrease to pH 4.5 at week 52. This slow pH decrease is attributed to neutralisation released upon Mg-siderite dissolution. The leachate pH from all treated KLCs was near-neutral at the end of the tests. Pyrite was surface-passivated and leaching supressed by all treatments except for calcite-saturated water. Leaching of Mn and Zn from the untreated waste identified the potential for adverse environmental impact. No evidence was found for surface passivation of Zn- or Mn-containing minerals in the treated KLCs. Blended calcite addition and lime-saturated water followed by calcite-saturated water were most effective at reducing release of Zn and Mn, likely due to precipitation as hydroxides/carbonates.

Mine Waste Rock: Insights for Sustainable Hydrogeochemical Management

Mismanagement of mine waste rock can mobilize acidity, metal (loid)s, and other contaminants, and thereby negatively affect downstream environments. Hence, strategic long-term planning is required to prevent and mitigate deleterious environmental impacts. Technical frameworks to support waste-rock management have existed for decades and typically combine static and kinetic testing, field-scale experiments, and sometimes reactive-transport models. Yet, the design and implementation of robust long-term solutions remains challenging to date, due to site-specificity in the generated waste rock and local weathering conditions, physicochemical heterogeneity in large-scale systems, and the intricate coupling between chemical kinetics and mass- and heat-transfer processes. This work reviews recent advances in our understanding of the hydrogeochemical behavior of mine waste rock, including improved laboratory testing procedures, innovative analytical techniques, multi-scale field investigations, and reactive-transport modeling. Remaining knowledge-gaps pertaining to the processes involved in mine waste weathering and their parameterization are identified. Practical and sustainable waste-rock management decisions can to a large extent be informed by evidence-based simplification of complex waste-rock systems and through targeted quantification of a limited number of physicochemical parameters. Future research on the key (bio)geochemical processes and transport dynamics in waste-rock piles is essential to further optimize management and minimize potential negative environmental impacts.

Unexpected Non-acid Drainage from Sulfidic Rock Waste

Most rock extraction sites, including mine sites and building construction sites, require a plan to assess, and mitigate if present, the risk of acid mine drainage (AMD). AMD is typically the major environmental concern where sulfide minerals are present in the excavated material and AMD prediction and remediation is based on internationally-accepted acid-base accounting (ABA) tests of representative field samples. This paper demonstrates that standardized ABA tests may not always be provide the correct AMD classification for commonly occurring waste rocks containing low-pyrite and -carbonate due to mineralogic assumptions inherent in their design. The application of these standard ABA tests at a copper mine site in South Australia resulted in the classification of a portion of its waste material as potentially acid forming in apparent contradiction to long term field measurements. Full definition of the sulfide and silicate minerals enabled re-evaluation of the weathering reactions occurring. The overall rate of neutralisation due to silicate dissolution was found to always exceed the rate of acid generation, in agreement with field observations. Consequently, the waste rock was redefined as non-acid forming. The methods developed represent a significant advance in AMD prediction and more strategic, cost-effective environmental planning, with potential for reclassification of wastes with similar characteristics.

Characterization of Mine Waste and Acid Mine Drainage Prediction by Simple Testing Methods in Terms of the Effects of Sulfate-Sulfur and Carbonate Minerals

Characterization of mine waste rocks and prediction of acid mine drainage (AMD) play an important role in preventing AMD. Although high-tech analytical methods have been highlighted for mineral characterization and quantification, simple testing methods are still practical ways to perform in a field laboratory in mines. Thus, this study applied some simple testing methods to the characterization of mine wastes and AMD prediction in addition to a leaching test and the sequential extraction test with HCl, HF, and HNO3, which have not been applied for these purposes, focusing on the form of sulfur and the neutralization effects of carbonates. The results of the Acid Buffering Characteristic Curve test supported the changing trend of the pH attributing carbonates only during the first 10 leaching cycles in the leaching test. The change in the Net Acid Generating (NAG) pH in the sequential NAG test reflected the solubility of sulfur in the rocks, providing information on the form of sulfur in the rocks and the acid-producing potential over time. Consequently, the sequential NAG test and sequential extraction with the acids in combination with the current standards tests (Acid Base Accounting and NAG tests) provided important information for preventing AMD.

Reliability improvement for predicting acid-forming potential of rock samples using static tests

In predicting the acid-forming potential of rock samples, a combination of acid-base accounting (ABA) and net acid generation (NAG) tests has been commonly used. While simple and economical, this method sometimes shows low reliability such as categorizing certain samples as uncertain (UC). ABA and NAG tests were modified to selectively recover valid minerals in nature and substituted for the original tests. ABA test overestimated acid-producing capacity (in the case of weathered samples) and acid-neutralizing capacity (in the case of plagioclase-including samples) compared to the modified ABA test. NAG test yielded lower NAG pH compared to modified NAG test for samples with high total C content and low total S content. By comparing the correlation coefficients between acid generation amounts by the two evaluation methods, it was confirmed that modified evaluation method (MEM) has a much higher reliability (R ² = 0.9582) than existing evaluation method (EEM) (R ² = 0.5873). It was also concluded that exploiting advantages of both EEM and MEM is recommended where EEM is initially applied for general classification and a supplemented static test of MEM is executed for the purpose of correcting the error of UC categorized samples.

Method for distinctive estimation of stored acidity forms in acid mine wastes

Jarosites and schwertmannite can be formed in the unsaturated oxidation zone of sulfide-containing mine waste rock and tailings together with ferrihydrite and goethite. They are also widely found in process wastes from electrometallurgical smelting and metal bioleaching and within drained coastal lowland soils (acid-sulfate soils). These secondary minerals can temporarily store acidity and metals or remove and immobilize contaminants through adsorption, coprecipitation, or structural incorporation, but release both acidity and toxic metals at pH above about 4. Therefore, they have significant relevance to environmental mineralogy through their role in controlling pollutant concentrations and dynamics in contaminated aqueous environments. Most importantly, they have widely different acid release rates at different pHs and strongly affect drainage water acidity dynamics. A procedure for estimation of the amounts of these different forms of nonsulfide stored acidity in mining wastes is required in order to predict acid release rates at any pH. A four-step extraction procedure to quantify jarosite and schwertmannite separately with various soluble sulfate salts has been developed and validated. Corrections to acid potentials and estimation of acid release rates can be reliably based on this method.