1
|
Hayes JE, Barczak RJ, Mel Suffet I, Stuetz RM. The use of gas chromatography combined with chemical and sensory analysis to evaluate nuisance odours in the air and water environment. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 180:108214. [PMID: 37769446 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Varieties of gas chromatography (GC) combined with chemical detection (CD) and sensory analysis at the odour detection port (ODP) for the evaluation of environmental odorants has steadily increased in application and sophistication; this has given rise to a plethora of techniques that cater to specific tasks. With this diversity of approaches in mind, there is a need to assess the critical points at which these approaches differ, as well as likely risks and factors that may affect them. These critical points explained within this review include sample preparation, GC separation techniques (with associated co-elution risks), how the elute is separated between CD and sensory analysis, the type of CD, the type of sensory analysis (with particular attention paid to its factors and guidelines), integrative data techniques, as well as how that data may be used. Additionally, this review provides commentary on the current state of the research space and makes recommendations based on how these analyses should be reported, the standardisation of nomenclature, as well as the impediments to the future goals of this research area. By careful consideration of the critical points of varying analytical processes and how best to communicate these findings, the quality of output within this area will improve. This review provides a benchmark for how GC-CD/sensory analysis should be undertaken and reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Hayes
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Radosław J Barczak
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 1 Pasteura Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Irwin Mel Suffet
- Dept. of Env. Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu J, Stuetz RM, Hamilton L, Power K, Crosbie ND, Tamburic B. Management of biogenic taste and odour: From source water, through treatment processes and distribution systems, to consumers. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 323:116225. [PMID: 36115245 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Biogenic taste and odour (T&O) have become a global concern for water utilities, due to the increasing frequency of algal blooms and other microbial events arising from the combined effects of climate change and eutrophication. Microbially-produced T&O compounds impact source waters, drinking water treatment plants, and drinking water distribution systems. It is important to manage across the entire biogenic T&O pathway to identify key risk factors and devise strategies that will safeguard the quality of drinking water in a changing world, since the presence of T&O impacts consumer confidence in drinking water safety. This study provides a critical review of current knowledge on T&O-causing microbes and compounds for proactive management, including the identification of abiotic risk factors in source waters, a discussion on the effectiveness of existing T&O barriers in drinking water treatment plants, an analysis of risk factors for biofilm growth in water distribution systems, and an assessment of the impacts of T&O on consumers. The fate of biogenic T&O in drinking water systems is tracked from microbial production pathways, through the release of intracellular T&O by cell lysis, to the treatment of microbial cells and dissolved T&O. Based on current knowledge, five impactful research and management directions across the T&O pathway are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Zhu
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | | | - Kaye Power
- Sydney Water Corporation, Parramatta, NSW, 2150, Australia
| | - Nicholas D Crosbie
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia; Melbourne Water Corporation, Docklands, VIC, 3008, Australia
| | - Bojan Tamburic
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu L, Abdala Prata Junior A, Fisher RM, Stuetz RM. Measuring volatile emissions from biosolids: A critical review on sampling methods. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 317:115290. [PMID: 35640405 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
As a by-product of wastewater treatment, biosolids are a source of volatile emissions which can lead to community complaints due to odours and other pollution risks. Sampling methods play a significant role in collecting gas emissions from biosolids-related sources (i.e., pure biosolids, landfilling, land application and composting of biosolids). Though a range of different sampling techniques (flux hood, wind tunnel, static chamber, headspace devices) have been explored in many published papers, the management and best practice for sampling emissions from biosolids is unclear. This paper presents a comprehensive review of sampling methods for collecting gaseous emissions from biosolids. To account for the inconsistent terminologies used to describe sampling devices, a standard nomenclature by grouping sampling devices into five categories was proposed. Literature investigating emission sampling from biosolids-related sources was reviewed. Subsequently a critical analysis of sampling methods in terms of design, advantages, and disadvantages were compiled based on literature findings and assumed mechanistic understanding of operation. Key operational factors such as the presence of fans, purge gas flow rates, insertion depth, and incubation conditions were identified and their level of influence on the measurement of emissions were evaluated. From the review, there are still knowledge gaps regarding sampling methods used to collect gases from biosolids-related sources. Therefore, a framework for the management of emission sampling methodologies based on common sampling purposes was proposed. This critical review is expected to improve the understanding of sampling methodologies used in biosolids-related sources, by demonstrating the potential implications and impacts due to different choices in sampling methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisha Liu
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ademir Abdala Prata Junior
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Ruth M Fisher
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Idris NF, Le-Minh N, Hayes JE, Stuetz RM. Performance of wet scrubbers to remove VOCs from rubber emissions. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 305:114426. [PMID: 34998062 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Poor performance of wet scrubbers in rubber processing plants due to breakthrough of specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) causes odour impact events. The performance of wet scrubbers in the rubber drying process to remove VOCs was investigated in order to determine the responsible odorants. VOC emissions originating at the inlet and outlet of wet scrubbers were quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/olfactometry (GC-MS/O). Critical VOCs were identified alongside seasonal and daily variations of those VOCs. Altogether, 80 VOCs were detected in rubber emissions with 16 classified as critical VOCs based on their chemical concentration, high odour activity value (OAV) and unpleasant odour. Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were the dominant VOCs with seasonal variations affecting emission composition. Results demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the wet scrubbers to mitigate odorous VOCs whereas the removal of some VOCs could be improved based on their polarity and solubility. It was found that there is a correlation between the wet scrubber performance and VFAs concentration in the emissions. The findings demonstrated that combining quantitative and sensory analyses improved accuracy in identifying odorous VOCs, which can cause odour annoyance from rubber processing. A VOC identification framework was proposed using both analyses approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Fadhilah Idris
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia; Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Malaysian Rubber Board, P.O. Box 10150, 50908, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nhat Le-Minh
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - James E Hayes
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Full-Scale Odor Abatement Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs): A Review. WATER 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/w13243503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The release of air pollutants from the operation of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is often a cause of odor annoyance for the people living in the surrounding area. Odors have been indeed recently classified as atmospheric pollutants and are the main cause of complaints to local authorities. In this context, the implementation of effective treatment solutions is of key importance for urban water cycle management. This work presents a critical review of the state of the art of odor treatment technologies (OTTs) applied in full-scale WWTPs to address this issue. An overview of these technologies is given by discussing their strengths and weaknesses. A sensitivity analysis is presented, by considering land requirements, operational parameters and efficiencies, based on data of full-scale applications. The investment and operating costs have been reviewed with reference to the different OTTs. Biofilters and biotrickling filters represent the two most applied technologies for odor abatement at full-scale plants, due to lower costs and high removal efficiencies. An analysis of the odors emitted by the different wastewater treatment units is reported, with the aim of identifying the principal odor sources. Innovative and sustainable technologies are also presented and discussed, evaluating their potential for full-scale applicability.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hawko C, Verriele M, Hucher N, Crunaire S, Leger C, Locoge N, Savary G. A review of environmental odor quantification and qualification methods: The question of objectivity in sensory analysis. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 795:148862. [PMID: 34328921 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
For several years, various issues have up surged linked to odor nuisances with impacts on health and economic concerns. As awareness grew, recent development in instrumental techniques and sensorial analysis have emerged offering efficient and complementary approaches regarding environmental odor monitoring and control. While chemical analysis faces several obstacles, the sensory approach can help overcome them. Therefore, this latter may be considered as subjective, putting the reliability of the studies at risk. This paper is a review of the most commonly sensory methodology used for quantitative and qualitative environmental assessment of odor intensity (OI), odor concentration (OC), odor nature (ON) and hedonic tone (HT). For each of these odor dimensions, the assessment techniques are presented and compared: panel characteristics are discussed; laboratory and field studies are considered and the objectivity of the results is debated. For odor quantification, the use of a reference scale for OI assessment offers less subjectivity than other techniques but at the expense of ease-of-use. For OC assessment, the use of dynamic olfactometry was shown to be the least biased. For odor qualification, the ON description was less subjective when a reference-based lexicon was used but at the expense of simplicity, cost, and lesser panel-training requirements. Only when assessing HT was subjectivity an accepted feature because it reflects the impacted communities' acceptance of odorous emissions. For all discussed dimensions, field studies were shown to be the least biased due to the absence of air sampling, except for OC, where the dispersion modeling approach also showed great potential. In conclusion, this paper offers the reader a guide for environmental odor sensory analysis with the capacity to choose among different methods depending on the study nature, expectations, and capacities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Hawko
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500 Douai, France; Normandie Univ, UNIHAVRE, FR3038 CNRS, URCOM, 76600 Le Havre, France
| | - Marie Verriele
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500 Douai, France
| | - Nicolas Hucher
- Normandie Univ, UNIHAVRE, FR3038 CNRS, URCOM, 76600 Le Havre, France
| | - Sabine Crunaire
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500 Douai, France
| | | | - Nadine Locoge
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500 Douai, France
| | - Géraldine Savary
- Normandie Univ, UNIHAVRE, FR3038 CNRS, URCOM, 76600 Le Havre, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prata AA, Santos JM, Timchenko V, Stuetz RM. Modelling atmospheric emissions from wastewater treatment plants: Implications of land-to-water roughness change. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 792:148330. [PMID: 34147812 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Atmospheric emissions from passive liquid surfaces, such as wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), are common sources of impacts to the environment and to the health of communities, due to odours, greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. Emission models have been broadly employed for assessing these emissions, with the wind friction velocity (u∗) being a key variable. The usual practice in the context of WWTP is to parametrise u∗ based on reference wind speeds measured over the land, without considering the internal boundary layer (IBL) development due to the change in aerodynamic roughness as the wind blows from the land to the liquid surface, nor the stability of the wind flow. The potential consequences of these conceptual inconsistencies are major knowledge gaps in emission modelling. Addressing these, a customised computation was implemented to couple the wind friction parametrisation with the evolution of the IBL downwind of the land-to-water roughness change. A sensitivity analysis with different emission models, considering ranges of fetch, wind speed and surface roughness encompassing typical conditions in WWTP, showed that not incorporating the roughness change leads to systematic overestimation of u∗ and the overall mass transfer coefficient KL for two compounds analysed (liquid phase and gas phase-controlled volatilisation). A modelling approach was devised, comprising the u∗ parametrisation that incorporate the roughness change combined with the Prata-Brutsaert emission model and alternative calculation of the gas-side mass transfer coefficient kG from local IBL variables. Evaluation against experimental data and physical considerations support the adoption of this approach for modelling the volatilisation of compounds from passive liquid surfaces in WWTP. A simplified equation to approximate u∗ after a change in roughness is presented, which can be used for quick emission modelling of liquid phase-controlled compounds. Furthermore, a preliminary exploration demonstrated that the effects of atmospheric stability on the response of u∗ to the land-to-water roughness change can be substantial under certain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ademir A Prata
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Jane M Santos
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Av. Fernando Ferrari 514, 29.060-970 Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Victoria Timchenko
- School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hawko C, Verriele M, Hucher N, Crunaire S, Leger C, Locoge N, Savary G. Objective odor analysis of incidentally emitted compounds using the Langage des Nez® method: application to the industrial zone of Le Havre. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 28:34852-34866. [PMID: 33660179 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12899-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Environmental odor studies are usually done using two approaches: nuisance impact assessment and source identification. The latter may be done using chemical analysis or sensory analysis. While sensory analyses offer many advantages, they also face the main obstacle: odor nature description still uses conventional methods based on subjective evocations as odor descriptors. This makes the sensory method ineffective especially when the expected outcome is the source identification in the context of an industrial accident. This work wants to fulfill this gap proposing to build an objective database including the odor nature description of selected potentially emitted compounds using a promising approach: the Langage des Nez® (LdN). Using definite odorous compounds as odor referents, this work provides the odor nature description of 44 compounds, reported as potential incidentally released chemical compounds in the industrial zone of Le Havre. The city of Le Havre, France, was chosen as a model due to a history of odorous emissions of industrial origins. A trained panel described the odor of each compound using up to three referents of the LdN referents collection and attributed a score to each referent. A data analysis method was developed based on the frequency of citation of the referents and the attributed scores allowing the categorization of each compound in three types of consensus categories. The data analysis results showed that around 80% of compounds were described with a good consensus, showing the LdN as a well-adapted lexicon. This study does not point to any correlation between the chemical structures of the compounds of interest and their relative referents. When compared to conventional methods, LdN revealed a more objective and precise approach. The proposed experimental method and the results provided in this work offer the first insight for time-efficient approaches to objectively describe environmental odors, especially potentially emitted odors during incidents. This work may be supplemented by abatement and mixture effect investigations for a complete understanding of odor dispersion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Hawko
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500, Douai, France
- URCOM, Université Le Havre Normandie, F-76600, Le Havre, France
| | - Marie Verriele
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500, Douai, France.
| | - Nicolas Hucher
- URCOM, Université Le Havre Normandie, F-76600, Le Havre, France
| | - Sabine Crunaire
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500, Douai, France
| | | | - Nadine Locoge
- IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Université de Lille, F-59500, Douai, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang YC, Han MF, Jia TP, Hu XR, Zhu HQ, Tong Z, Lin YT, Wang C, Liu DZ, Peng YZ, Wang G, Meng J, Zhai ZX, Zhang Y, Deng JG, Hsi HC. Emissions, measurement, and control of odor in livestock farms: A review. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 776:145735. [PMID: 33640544 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Odor emissions from intensive livestock farms have attracted increased attention due to their adverse impacts on the environment and human health. Nevertheless, a systematic summary regarding the characteristics, sampling detection, and control technology for odor emissions from livestock farms is currently lacking. This paper compares the development of odor standards in different countries and summarizes the odor emission characteristics of livestock farms. Ammonia, the most common odor substance, can reach as high as 4100 ppm in the compost area. Sampling methods for point and area source odor emissions are introduced in this paper, and odor analysis methods are compared. Olfactometers, odorometers, and the triangle odor bag method are usually used to measure odor concentration. Odor control technologies are divided into three categories: physical (activated carbon adsorption, masking, and dilution diffusion), chemical (plant extract spraying, wet scrubbing, combustion, non-thermal plasma, and photocatalytic oxidation), and biological (biofiltration, biotrickling, and bioscrubbing). Each technology is elucidated, and the performance in the removal of different pollutants is summarized. The application scopes, costs, operational stability, and secondary pollution of the technologies are compared. The generation of secondary pollution and long-term operation stability are issues that should be considered in future technological development. Lastly, a case analysis for engineering application is conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Chao Wang
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Meng-Fei Han
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Ti-Pei Jia
- National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Engineering Research Center of Beijing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| | - Xu-Rui Hu
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Huai-Qun Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Equipment and Informatization in Environment Controlled Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Zhen Tong
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Yu-Ting Lin
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Can Wang
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China.
| | - De-Zhao Liu
- Key Laboratory of Equipment and Informatization in Environment Controlled Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
| | - Yong-Zhen Peng
- National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Engineering Research Center of Beijing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
| | - Gen Wang
- State Key Laboratory on Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China
| | - Jie Meng
- State Key Laboratory on Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China; Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300191, China
| | - Zeng-Xiu Zhai
- State Key Laboratory on Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China; Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300191, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory on Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China; Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300191, China
| | - Ji-Guang Deng
- College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| | - Hsing-Cheng Hsi
- Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Determination of Dose–Response Relationship to Derive Odor Impact Criteria for a Wastewater Treatment Plant. ATMOSPHERE 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/atmos12030371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) inside cities have been the major complained sources of odor pollution in China, whereas there is little knowledge about the dose–response relationship to describe the resident complaints caused by odor exposure. This study explored a dose–response relationship between the modelled exposure and the annoyance surveyed by questionnaires. Firstly, the time series of odor concentrations were preliminarily simulated by a dispersion model. Secondly, the perception-related odor exposures were further calculated by combining with the peak to mean factors (constant value 4 (Germany) and 2.3 (Italy)), different time periods of “a whole year”, “summer”, and “nighttime of summer”, and two approaches of odor impact criterion (OIC) (“odor-hour” and “odor concentration”). Thirdly, binomial logistic regression models were used to compare kinds of perception-related odor exposures and odor annoyance by odds ratio, goodness of fit and predictive ability. All perception-related odor exposures were positively associated with odor annoyance. The best goodness of fit was found when using “nighttime of summer” in predicting odor-annoyance responses, which highlights the importance of the time of the day and the time of the year weighting. The best predictive performance for odor perception was determined when the OIC was 4 ou/m3 at the 99th percentile for the odor exposure over time periods of nighttime of summer. The study of dose–response relationship could be useful for the odor management and control of WWTP to maximize the satisfaction of air quality for the residents inside city.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zeng Q, Hao T, Sun B, Luo J, Chen G, Crittenden JC. Electrochemical Pretreatment for Sludge Sulfide Control without Chemical Dosing: A Mechanistic Study. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2019; 53:14559-14567. [PMID: 31746592 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Sulfide is a toxic and corrosive odorant generated in various sludge treatment and disposal systems. We developed an electrochemical pretreatment (EPT) approach to eliminate sludge sulfide production without adding chemicals. Biochemical sulfide potential (BSP) test was used to evaluate the effectiveness of EPT on sludge sulfide production. The sulfide control was effective with EPT, and we determined the underlying mechanism of EPT. EPT which was operated at 12 V for 720 s eliminated 99% of dissolved sulfide and 100% of gaseous H2S(g). In comparison, the dissolved sulfide reached 104 ± 1 mg S/L in the control BSP test. A sulfur mass balance analysis in the BSP test showed that 90% of the produced sulfide was removed via metal precipitation. Metal distribution results confirmed that metals (i.e., Fe, Mn, and Ni) in the sludge became soluble after EPT and were released from their residual and organically bound fractions. EPT which was operated at 15 V solubilized around 73, 92, and 72% of Fe, Mn, and Ni, and these metals precipitated the sulfide that was produced from biological sulfate reduction. Sludge analysis revealed that EPT disintegrated sludge flocs and disrupted metal-binding functional groups. Specifically, reduction of 17% C═O functional groups in the sludge was found, which could be associated with metal release. The impact of oxidants (e.g., chlorine) generated from EPT on sulfide oxidation was minimal. The findings of this study broadened up our understanding of the electrochemical process for sulfide control during saline sludge digestion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tianwei Hao
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Macau , Macau 999078 , China
| | | | - Jinming Luo
- Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology , 828 West Peachtree Street , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States
| | - Guanghao Chen
- Wastewater Treatment Laboratory, FYT Graduate School , The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , Guangzhou 511458 , China
| | - John C Crittenden
- Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology , 828 West Peachtree Street , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barczak RJ, Fisher RM, Le-Minh N, Stuetz RM. Importance of 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole (TCA) as an odorant in the emissions from anaerobically stabilized dewatered biosolids. CHEMOSPHERE 2019; 236:124340. [PMID: 31344618 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Odours from stabilized biosolids after anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludge can cause local community impact. Apart from the well-known odorants such as sulfur compounds, contributions from other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to nuisance odours is limited. The presence of compounds with low odour detection thresholds (ODTs) at low concentrations, can present challenges for analytical identification. Thirty-six biosolids samples were taken after anaerobic stabilisation and dewatering at a wastewater treatment plant, Sydney, Australia. Biosolid cake samples were stored outside in loosely covered trays under aerobic conditions, however without interactions with soil microorganisms as it would be in reality. All biosolids cake samples were analysed over a period of 35 days. Emissions were collected onto Tenax TA sorbent tubes using a U.S. EPA flux hood method at storage days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 35. Gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometer detector (MSD) and an olfactory detection port (ODP) was used to identify a musty/moldy/earthy type odorant in the biosolids emissions as 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA). Measured odour intensities, classified on a scale from 1 to 4, and odour characters were specified by three ODP assessors. TCA was identified in all biosolid cake emissions. The measured odour intensities of the TCA did not significantly alter as the biosolids were aged, however varied between biosolids cakes. Due to its odour intensity, 85% frequency of detection and its low ODT, which is orders of magnitudes lower than sulfur compounds, TCA should be considered as a potential odorant of concern in biosolids emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Barczak
- Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland; UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - R M Fisher
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Le-Minh
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - R M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hayes JE, Fisher RM, Stevenson RJ, Stuetz RM. Investigation of non-community stakeholders regarding community engagement and environmental malodour. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 665:546-556. [PMID: 30776626 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Research into industry-community relationships have focused almost exclusively on the ways in which communities responds to actions from industries. This has led to a paucity of understanding with regards to how community engagement and malodour amelioration practices have been adopted by industry personnel, as well as the attitudes and beliefs of non-community stakeholders in general. In this study, a survey to water industry personnel was distributed to three Australian water utilities in South-Eastern Australia and a semi-structured interview process was carried out with plant managers at six wastewater treatment plants. It was observed that best practice has not yet been established with regards to community engagement and odour amelioration, and that water industry personnel in general had a poor understanding of these concepts. Recommendations for how this situation could be improved, and how non-community stakeholders investigated, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Hayes
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Ruth M Fisher
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Richard J Stevenson
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Keck M, Mager K, Weber K, Keller M, Frei M, Steiner B, Schrade S. Odour impact from farms with animal husbandry and biogas facilities. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2018; 645:1432-1443. [PMID: 30248865 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Agricultural biogas facilities are usually combined with animal husbandry. Their siting near residential areas can lead to odour complaints by residents. The aim of this study was to identify relevant odour sources, to record odour impact, and to determine the main variables influencing odour impact. Therefore, a combined approach was designed to account for individual odour sources as well as the farms as a whole. On eight farms with cattle husbandry and biogas facilities, two of which kept pigs and poultry, the odour-relevant area sources ranged between 475 and 1810 m2. Solid manure from poultry, cattle and horses as well as grass cuttings, vegetable peelings, liquid-silage effluent and fermentation residues figured among the odour-intensive sources, in addition to biogas. Odour-plume inspections were performed at various distances from the farm, and assessors determined their odour perception and -intensities. The odour intensity in the downwind plume axis was explainable in a linear mixed-effects model by distance (p < 0.001), emitting surface area (p = 0.002) and wind speed (p = 0.018). As distance increased, odour intensity decreased by a factor of two per 50 m. Higher odour intensities resulted from larger surface areas in the animal enclosure, substrate storage, or especially odour-relevant sources. A mixture of odours was frequently perceived in the odour plume. If biogas escaped, an increase in odour impact was recognisable (p = 0.021). Biogas leakage should be avoided with a sufficiently large storage capacity, process optimisation, and regular servicing. In summary, animal husbandry and biogas facilities are to be viewed as an entire plant in terms of downwind odour perception. In planning processes for biogas facilities with animal husbandry, great care in the choice of site is called for, as are structural-technical and organisational measures for abatement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margret Keck
- Agroscope, Tänikon 1, 8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | - Beat Steiner
- Agroscope, Tänikon 1, 8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fisher RM, Barczak RJ, Suffet IHM, Hayes JE, Stuetz RM. Framework for the use of odour wheels to manage odours throughout wastewater biosolids processing. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2018; 634:214-223. [PMID: 29627544 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Odorous emissions from wastewater biosolids processing can cause nuisance impacts to the surrounding community. Odour Wheels are an effective tool for environmental odour management, but have yet to be provided for wastewater biosolids processing. Emissions throughout the biosolids processing from eight wastewater treatment plants, each with different unit operation configurations, were surveyed to identify odorants present and their olfactory properties. Chemical and olfactory methods identified a range of odorants and odours emitted throughout biosolids processing. Within the biosolids processing locations studied Sulfur type odours, described as rotten eggs or cabbage, were typically encountered. However, there was also a varying presence of Rancid/putrid and Faecal/manure type odours. Odour Wheels were generated to communicate both the olfactory and chemical components of emissions which were measured throughout biosolids processing. Examples based on the operation of the eight wastewater treatment plants were used to demonstrate how the Odour Wheels can be used as an onsite odour management aid. The paper demonstrates how Odour Wheels can be prepared using chemical and olfactory measurements and then used to communicate olfactory properties, as well as identify the causes of nuisance emissions throughout biosolids processing at wastewater treatment plants. The linking of odours and odorants to process conditions throughout biosolids processing facilitates effective abatement and management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth M Fisher
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Radoslaw J Barczak
- Faculty of Building Service, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - I H Mel Suffet
- Dept. of Env. Health Sciences and Environmental Science and Engineering Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James E Hayes
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard M Stuetz
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|