C:N ratio is not a reliable predictor of N2O production in acidic soils after a 30-day artificial manipulation

Relative importance between nitrification and denitrification to N2 O from a global perspective

Nitrous oxide (N2 O) is a potent greenhouse gas, and its mitigation is a pressing task in the coming decade. However, it remains unclear which specific process between concurrent nitrification and denitrification dominates worldwide N2 O emission. We snagged an opportunity to ascertain whence the N2 O came and which were the controlling factors on the basis of 1315 soil N2 O observations from 74 peer-reviewed articles. The average N2 O emission derived from nitrification (N2 On ) was higher than that from denitrification (N2 Od ) worldwide. The ratios of nitrification-derived N2 O to denitrification-derived N2 O, hereof N2 On :N2 Od , exhibited large variations across terrestrial ecosystems. Although soil carbon and nitrogen content, pH, moisture, and clay content accounted for a part of the geographical variations in the N2 On :N2 Od ratio, ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM):denitrifier ratio was the pivotal driver for the N2 On :N2 Od ratios, since the AOM:denitrfier ratio accounted for 53.7% of geographical variations in N2 On :N2 Od ratios. Compared with natural ecosystems, soil pH exerted a more remarkable role to dictate the N2 On :N2 Od ratio in croplands. This study emphasizes the vital role of functional soil microorganisms in geographical variations of N2 On :N2 Od ratio and lays the foundation for the incorporation of soil AOM:denitrfier ratio into models to better predict N2 On :N2 Od ratio. Identifying soil N2 O derivation will provide a global potential benchmark for N2 O mitigation by manipulating the nitrification or denitrification.

Deciphering nitrous oxide emissions from tropical soils of different land uses

Tropical regions are hotspots of increasing greenhouse gas emissions associated with land-use change. Although many field studies have quantified soil fluxes of nitrous oxide (N₂O; a potent greenhouse gas) from various land uses, the driving mechanisms remain uncertain. Here, we used tropical soils of diverse land uses and actively manipulated the soil moisture (35%, 60%, and 95% water-filled pore space [WFPS]) and substrate supply (control, nitrate, and nitrate plus glucose) to investigate the responses of N₂O emissions with short-term incubations. We then identified key factors regulating N₂O emissions out of a series of soil physicochemical and biological factors and explored how these factors interacted to drive N₂O emissions. Land-use changes from primary forest to oil palm or Acacia plantation risks emitting more N₂O, whereas low emissions could be maintained by conversion to Macaranga forest or Imperata grassland; these laboratory observations were corroborated by a literature synthesis of field N₂O measurements across tropical regions. Soil redox potential (Eh) and labile organic nitrogen (LON; amino acid mixture, arginine, and urea) mineralization were among the factors with greatest influence on N₂O emissions. In contrast to common understandings, the control of WFPS over N₂O emissions was largely indirect, and acted through Eh. The mineralization of LON, particularly arginine, potentially played multiple roles in N₂O production (e.g., bottlenecks of nitrifier-denitrification or simultaneous nitrification-denitrification versus substrate competition for co-denitrification). Structural equation models suggest that soil-environmental factors of different levels (from distal including land use, soil moisture, and pH to proximal such as LON mineralization) drive N₂O emissions through cascading interactions. Overall, we show that, despite identical initial soil conditions, land conversion can substantially alter the N₂O emission potential. Also, collectively considering soil-environmental regulators and their interactions associated with land conversion is crucial to predict and design mitigation strategies for N₂O emissions from land-use change.

Variation, distribution, and diversity of canonical ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms and complete-nitrifying bacteria in highly contaminated ecological restoration regions in the Siding mine area

Canonical ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and complete-nitrifying bacteria (comammox) exist in a variety of ecosystems. However, little is known about AOA, AOB and comammox or their contributions to nitrification in the soils of heavily degraded and acidic mine regions. In the present study, the activity, richness, diversity and distribution patterns of AOA, AOB and comammox in the Siding mine area were investigated. Nemerow's multifactor pollution index (P_N) values indicated that the soil in all three areas in the Siding mine area was highly contaminated by Cd, Pb, Zn, Mn and Cu. The AOA, AOB and comammox amoA gene copy numbers exhibited significant positive correlations with Pb and Zn levels and P_N values, which indicated that the populations of AOA, AOB and comammox underwent adaptation and reproduction in response to pollution from multiple metals in the Siding mine area. Among them, the abundance of AOA was the highest, and AOA may survive better than AOB and comammox under such severely pollution-stressed and ammonia-limited conditions. The phyla Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota may play vital roles in the soil ammonia oxidation process. Unlike AOA, AOB may use soil available phosphorus to help them compete for NH₃ and other limiting nutrients with AOA and heterotrophs. Moreover, soil organic matter was the main factor influencing the species diversity of AOB, the β-diversity of AOB and comammox, and the community composition of AOA, AOB and comammox. Our research will help to explain the role and importance of AOA, AOB and comammox in the different ecological restoration regions in the Siding mine area.

How nitrification-related N2O is associated with soil ammonia oxidizers in two contrasting soils in China?

As a key process contributing to N₂O emissions, nitrification is regulated by soil microbes and mainly affected by soil pH, NH₃ availability, temperature and O₂ availability. Current knowledge gaps include how nitrification-related N₂O is associated with soil microbes in different pH soils. In the current study, a microcosm incubation experiment was conducted with two contrasting soils of different pH (5.08, 8.30) under controlled conditions. The soils were amended with ammonium sulphate ((NH₄)₂SO₄, 50 mg N kg^-1) combined with or without nitrification inhibitors and incubated under 20 °C, 65% water hold capacity (WHC) for three weeks. N₂O fluxes, mineral nitrogen (N) concentrations and ammonia oxidizers populations were measured during the incubation to investigate the correlations of nitrification-related N₂O with ammonia oxidizers. The nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) was used to inhibit nitrification albeit to various inhibition effects with different soils. Acetylene (0.1% v/v C₂H₂), an inhibitor of AOA and AOB ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), was used to distinguish N₂O emissions by nitrifiers and denitrifiers. 1-octyne (5 μM aqueous), a selective specific AOB inhibitor, was used to assess the relative contributions of AOA and AOB to N₂O emissions. The results showed that N₂O yield for AOA and AOB varied with soil pH. AOB was the key microbial player in alkaline soil, contributing about 85% of nitrification-related N₂O. Conversely, about 78% of nitrification-related N₂O was contributed by AOA in acidic soil. Furthermore, there was a significant and positive relationship between mineral N (NO₂^-, NO₃^-), AOA and AOB populations and nitrification-related N₂O in alkaline soil. However, in acidic soil, NO₃^- concentration and AOA had significantly positive relationships with nitrification-related N₂O. To conclude, soil pH was a key factor affecting the contribution of ammonia oxidizers to nitrification-related N₂O emissions. AOA-related N₂O production dominated at low pH (5.08), while AOB-related N₂O was favored in alkaline soil (pH 8.3).

Can N Fertilizer Addition Affect N2O Isotopocule Signatures for Soil N2O Source Partitioning?

Isotopocule signatures of N₂O (δ¹⁵N^bulk, δ¹⁸O and site preference) are useful for discerning soil N₂O source, but sometimes, N fertilizer is needed to ensure that there is enough N₂O flux for accurate isotopocule measurements. However, whether fertilizer affects these measurements is unknown. This study evaluated a gradient of NH₄NO₃ addition on N₂O productions and isotopocule values in two acidic subtropical soils. The results showed that N₂O production rates obviously amplified with increasing NH₄NO₃ (p < 0.01), although a lower N₂O production rate and an increasing extent appeared in forest soil. The δ¹⁵N^bulk of N₂O produced in forest soil was progressively enriched when more NH₄NO₃ was added, while becoming more depleted of agricultural soil. Moreover, the N₂O site preference (SP) values collectively elevated with increasing NH₄NO₃ in both soils, indicating that N₂O contributions changed. The increased N₂O production in agricultural soil was predominantly due to the added NH₄NO₃ via autotrophic nitrification and fungal denitrification (beyond 50%), which significantly increased with added NH₄NO₃, whereas soil organic nitrogen contributed most to N₂O production in forest soil, probably via heterotrophic nitrification. Lacking the characteristic SP of heterotrophic nitrification, its N₂O contribution change cannot be accurately identified yet. Overall, N fertilizer should be applied strictly according to the field application rate or N deposition amount when using isotopocule signatures to estimate soil N₂O processes.

Plastic film mulching affects N2O emission and ammonia oxidizers in drip irrigated potato soil in northwest China

In soil, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) are regarded as key factors mediating nitrous oxide (N₂O) production and emission. However, there are scarce reports about the effect of film mulching on ammonia oxidizers, and the biological nitrification process of N₂O emission is unclear. This study was based on potato field experiments under different mulching films, including polyethylene mulching film (PM), transparent degradable mulching film (TDM), black degradable mulching film (BDM), and bare land (CK). AOB and AOA abundances were estimated using real-time PCR, and their diversity and community structure were measured using high-throughput sequencing. Result revealed that the total N₂O emission from CK was 12.32%-41.03% higher than that from film mulching soil. Under film mulching, according to total N₂O emission from soil and N₂O concentration in soil treatments were ordered as PM > BDM > TDM, and N₂O production was closely correlated with copy numbers of the amoA gene. BDM significantly increased the number of amoA-AOB gene copies (P < 0.01), and PM significantly increased the those of amoA-AOA (P < 0.01). BDM and TDM increased AOB operational taxonomic units (OTUs), Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon indices, while PM increased the AOA OTUs and Chao1 index. Variations in AOA abundance and diversity were closely related to soil mineral N and temperature changes induced by polyethylene film mulching (P < 0.05), whereas AOB showed no significant association with soil properties. Meanwhile, we did not find a distinct treatment effect on AOB community structure. Our findings indicate that (i) degradable film mulching increased AOB abundance and diversity and N₂O concentration, but obviously reduced N₂O emissions, and (ii) AOA were more sensitive than AOB to polyethylene mulching film.