Scalp EEG does not predict hemispherectomy outcome

Current practices in the diagnosis and treatment of Rasmussen syndrome: Results of an international survey

PURPOSE

Rasmussen syndrome (RS) is marked by progressive unihemispheric atrophy, resulting in hemiparesis, refractory epilepsy, and cognitive/language decline. Detailed diagnostic and treatment algorithms are currently lacking. We aimed to survey medical providers on their current practices in the diagnosis and treatment of RS.

METHODS

A steering committee was formed to create the survey, which was disseminated to the international medical community. One hundred twelve surveys were completed. Descriptive statistics, as well as comparisons by level of experience, patient age group cared for, and geographic region using Fisher's exact test, were conducted.

RESULTS

Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (82 %) and serum (78 %) for autoimmune encephalitis (AE) are completed by most, while approximately one-third obtain genetic and metabolic studies in all patients (36 % and 38 %, respectively). Providers in US and Europe more readily pursue serum AE antibody panels (85 % and 85 %, respectively, versus 67 %, p = 0.019) and genetic testing (56 % and 47 %, respectively, versus 14 %, p < 0.001) than the rest of the world. Thirty-six percent proceed to biopsy in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria, and US providers are more likely to suggest this than others (73 % versus 14-41 %, p < 0.001). Opinions differed on the prioritization of hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy versus immunotherapy in 14 clinical scenarios with various neurologic deficit severity provided. Preferred immunotherapy regimens also varied, with US providers more often choosing IVIG as first-line (67 %) compared to others (28 %-32 %, p = 0.030). Surgical standard of care was identified as functional hemispherectomy or hemispherotomy by 90 %.

CONCLUSION

The survey highlights trends but also significant variations in clinical practice that can serve as targets for future research and expert consensus guidelines.

Escaping the Procrustean Bed: A Perspective on Pediatric Stereoelectroencephalography

SUMMARY

Stereoelectroencephalography is an established, hypothesis-driven method for investigating refractory epilepsy. There are special considerations and some limitations that apply to children who undergo stereoelectroencephalography. A key principle in stereoelectroencephalography is taking an individualized approach to investigating refractory epilepsy. A crucial factor for success in a personalized pediatric epilepsy surgery is understanding some of the fundamental and unique aspects of it, including, but not limited to, diverse etiology, epilepsy syndromes, maturation, and age-related characteristics as well as neural plasticity. Such features are reflected in the ontogeny of semiology and electrophysiology. In addition, special considerations are taken into account during cortical stimulation in children. Stereoelectroencephalography can guide a tailored surgical intervention where it is sufficient to render the patient seizure-free but it also lessens collateral damage with a minimum or no functional deficit. Epilepsy surgery outcomes remain stagnant despite advances in noninvasive testing modalities. A stereoelectroencephalography "way of thinking" and guided mentorship may influence outcomes positively.

Multimodal non-invasive evaluation in MRI-negative epilepsy patients

Presurgical evaluation is still challenging for MRI-negative epilepsy patients. As non-invasive modalities are the easiest acceptable and economic methods in determining the epileptogenic zone, we analyzed the localization value of common non-invasive methods in MRI-negative epilepsy patients. In this study, we included epilepsy patients undergoing presurgical evaluation with presurgical negative MRI. MRI post-processing was performed using a Morphometric Analysis Program (MAP) on T1-weighted volumetric MRI. The relationship between MAP, magnetoencephalography (MEG), scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), and seizure outcomes was analyzed to figure out the localization value of different non-invasive methods. Eighty-six patients were included in this study. Complete resection of the MAP-positive regions or the MEG-positive regions was positively associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.028 and 0.007, respectively). When an area is co-localized by MAP and MEG, the resection of the area was significantly associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.006). However, neither the EEG lateralization nor the EEG localization showed statistical association with the surgical outcome (p = 0.683 and 0.505, respectively). In conclusion, scalp EEG had a limited role in presurgical localization and predicting seizure outcome, combining MAP and MEG results can significantly improve the localization of epileptogenic lesions and have a positive association with seizure-free outcome. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Due to the lack of obvious structure abnormalities on neuroimaging examinations, the identification of epilepsy lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients can be difficult. In this study, we intended to use non-invasive examinations to explore the potential epileptic lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients and to determine the results accuracy by comparing the neuroimaging results with the epilepsy surgery outcomes. A total of 86 epilepsy patients without obvious structure lesions on MRI were included, and we found that the combinations of different non-invasive examinations and neuroimaging post-processing methods are significantly associated with the seizure freedom results of epilepsy surgery.

Prognostic Value of Preoperative and Postoperative Electroencephalography Findings in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hemispheric Epilepsy Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The seizure outcomes after hemispheric epilepsy surgery have been excellent, with 54%-90% of patients achieving long-term freedom from seizures. Similarly, the neuropsychological outcomes have been favorable. The prognostic value of pre- and postoperative electroencephalography (EEG) has not been well-studied. In the present study, we characterized the value of the pre- and postoperative EEG findings for predicting the seizure and neuropsychological outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing hemispherectomy.

METHODS

A total of 22 children who had undergone functional hemispherectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2020 were included. The ictal and interictal findings were categorized as ipsilateral to the operated hemisphere, independently arising from the contralateral hemisphere, and/or generalized. The seizure outcomes were classified using the Engel scale. All neuropsychological evaluations were performed in accordance with our institution's protocol. The relationship between the EEG findings and outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, 19 (86%) were seizure free (Engel class IA) at the latest follow-up (mean, 4.2 years). On the preoperative EEGs, 9 had had seizures, all had had ipsilateral interictal discharges, and 9 had had contralateral interictal discharges. On the postoperative EEGs, obtained a median of 1 year after surgery, 3 had had seizures, 16 had had ipsilateral interictal discharges, and 5 had had contralateral interictal discharges. Of the 3 patients with seizures found on the postoperative EEG, all were clinically free of seizures. The patients who had not achieved Engel class IA were not significantly more likely to have abnormalities found on the EEG. The neuropsychological scores were stable from before to after surgery, with no evidence of EEG abnormalities having predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The seizure and neuropsychology outcomes after hemispherectomy were excellent in our study, with 86% of our cohort achieving freedom from seizures. The presence, lateralization, and evolution of pre- and postoperative EEG abnormalities were not predictive of the outcomes.

Discordant electroencephalogram epileptiform activity and hemispherectomy in children with refractory epilepsy and encephaloclastic lesions: a case series

This is a case series of six children with unilateral cerebral palsy and hemispheric encephaloclastic lesions who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery. Seizure onset was in the neonatal period in three children, at 17 months in two, and at 5 years in one. Their ictal and interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities showed paradoxical lateralization to the incorrect/'normal' hemisphere or showed bilateral abnormalities. After cautious discussion regarding the discordant electroclinical profile and implications for outcome, they proceeded to a functional hemispherectomy (between ages 4-11y) with good outcomes (at 1-10y follow-up). Their clinical details, EEG findings, electrocorticography, neuroimaging, and histology are reported. Possible surgical candidacy should be evaluated early in children with refractory epilepsy, even those with complex profiles and discordant data from the different investigations. Contralateral or bilateral EEG abnormalities should not preclude consideration of hemispherectomy in children with refractory epilepsy, hemiparesis, and uniclastic lesions.

Hemispherectomy Outcome Prediction Scale: Development and validation of a seizure freedom prediction tool

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model to predict seizure freedom in children undergoing cerebral hemispheric surgery for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed 1267 hemispheric surgeries performed in pediatric participants across 32 centers and 12 countries to identify predictors of seizure freedom at 3 months after surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed based on 70% of the dataset (training set) and validated on 30% of the dataset (validation set). Missing data were handled using multiple imputation techniques.

RESULTS

Overall, 817 of 1237 (66%) hemispheric surgeries led to seizure freedom (median follow-up = 24 months), and 1050 of 1237 (85%) were seizure-free at 12 months after surgery. A simple regression model containing age at seizure onset, presence of generalized seizure semiology, presence of contralateral 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography hypometabolism, etiologic substrate, and previous nonhemispheric resective surgery is predictive of seizure freedom (area under the curve = .72). A Hemispheric Surgery Outcome Prediction Scale (HOPS) score was devised that can be used to predict seizure freedom.

SIGNIFICANCE

Children most likely to benefit from hemispheric surgery can be selected and counseled through the implementation of a scale derived from a multiple regression model. Importantly, children who are unlikely to experience seizure control can be spared from the complications and deficits associated with this surgery. The HOPS score is likely to help physicians in clinical decision-making.

Failed Hemispherotomy: Insights from Our Early Experience in 40 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To study the factors responsible for failure of hemispherotomy and outcomes of revision surgery. The effect of the surgeon's learning curve on failures was also analyzed.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients, who underwent functional hemispherotomy through a 4-year period, from the inception of the single-surgeon epilepsy surgery program, were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 47 functional hemispherotomies were performed in the study period in 40 patients (7 revision surgeries on 6 patients). Mean age of the cohort was 9.45 ± 14.84 years and it included 7 infants (<2 years). Of the 9 patients (23.5%) who failed the first procedure, 6 qualified for revision surgery, all of whom belonged to the cohort of the first 15 patients treated during the first 2 years of the program. Hemimegalencephaly was the most common disease (n = 4). Ipsilateral temporal stem (n = 3), frontobasal connections (n = 2), splenium of corpus callosum (n = 2), and posterior insula (n = 2) were residual undisconnected substrates identified for revision on imaging. The substrates for failure were obvious in 5/6 patients and resulted from incomplete disconnection, implying surgical inadequacy. At the mean follow-up of 30 ± 13.17 months (range, 13-55 months), 35 of 40 patients (87.5%) remained seizure free (Engel class Ia), including 4/6 patients who underwent redo surgery. Revision did not benefit the remaining 2 patients (Engel class III). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical revision is more common in hemimegalencephaly and in the early days of a surgical program. Affirmative neuroimaging improves the outcomes of subsequent revision surgery.

Measure thrice, cut twice: On the benefit of reoperation for failed pediatric epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinical outcomes are improved after repeat surgery for medically refractory epilepsy in children.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who received repeat resective surgery for ongoing seizures from 2000-2017. From a total of 251 consecutive individual epilepsy surgical patients for focal resection, 53 patients met study inclusion criteria and had adequate follow-up documented.

RESULTS

Median age of seizure-onset was 2.0-years-old (IQR 0.3-5.5 years). The median age at first epilepsy surgery was 6.3-years-old (IQR 2.9-9.2 years) and at second epilepsy surgery was 8.4-years-old (IQR 4.7-12.6 years). Overall, 53 % (n = 28) of this series achieved Engel Class I (seizure freedom); with improved seizure control (Engel Class I-II) in 83 % (n = 44) of the cohort. 64 % (n = 34) had one reoperation; 26 % (n = 14) had two; and 9% (n = 5) had three. Pathology: 58 % (n = 31) had focal cortical dysplasia; 13 % (n = 10) tumor; 9% (n = 5) encephalitis; 6% (n = 3) gliosis; 4% (n = 2) mesial temporal sclerosis; and 2% (n = 1) hemimegalencephaly. Tumor pathology was associated with increased chance (p = 0.01) for seizure freedom (90 % of tumor patients had Engel Class I outcome). MTS had worse outcome with both patients having ongoing seizures (Engel II-IV). There were 6 patients who developed post-operative hemiparesis; one was unplanned but resolved.

SIGNIFICANCE

Reoperation for pediatric epilepsy surgery can lead to seizure freedom in many cases and improved seizure control in most cases. Reoperation for brain tumor pathology is associated with a high rate of seizure freedom.

EEG lateralization and seizure outcome following peri-insular hemispherotomy for pediatric hemispheric epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative non-lateralizing scalp electroencephalography (EEG) influences seizure outcome following peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) in pediatric hemispheric epilepsy.

METHODS

Retrospective data was collected on all 45 pediatric patients who underwent PIH between 2005 and 2016. All underwent a basic pre-surgical evaluation consisting of detailed history and examination, neuropsychological assessment, MRI, and EEG. SPECT/PET, fRMI, or Wada testing were done in only eight patients. Seizure outcome was assessed using the Engel classification.

RESULTS

Among those who underwent hemispherotomy, 20 (44%) were females. Mean age at surgery was 8 ± 4.3 years and mean duration of symptoms was 5.2 ± 3.7 years. The most common etiologies of hemispheric epilepsy were hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia epilepsy syndrome, Rasmussen encephalitis, and post-encephalitic sequelae, together comprising 27 (60%) patients. Among the 44 patients with follow-up data (mean duration 48 ± 33 months), seizure freedom (Engel class I) was attained by 41 (93.2%). Anti-epileptic medications were stopped or decreased in 36 (82%). Seventeen (38.6%) patients had non-lateralizing EEG. Seizure outcome was not related to lateralization of EEG activity.

CONCLUSIONS

PIH provides excellent long-term seizure control in patients despite the presence of non-lateralizing epileptiform activity, although occurrence of acute postoperative seizures may be higher. Routine SPECT/PET may not be required in patients with a non-lateralizing EEG if there is good clinico-radiological concordance.

Surgery for epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review, published in 2015.Focal epilepsies are caused by a malfunction of nerve cells localised in one part of one cerebral hemisphere. In studies, estimates of the number of individuals with focal epilepsy who do not become seizure-free despite optimal drug therapy vary between at least 20% and up to 70%. If the epileptogenic zone can be located, surgical resection offers the chance of a cure with a corresponding increase in quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to assess the overall outcome of epilepsy surgery according to evidence from randomised controlled trials.Secondary objectives are to assess the overall outcome of epilepsy surgery according to non-randomised evidence, and to identify the factors that correlate with remission of seizures postoperatively.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, we searched the following databases on 11 March 2019: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to March 08, 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included at least 30 participants in a well-defined population (age, sex, seizure type/frequency, duration of epilepsy, aetiology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis, surgical findings), with an MRI performed in at least 90% of cases and an expected duration of follow-up of at least one year, and reporting an outcome related to postoperative seizure control. Cohort studies or case series were included in the previous version of this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three groups of two review authors independently screened all references for eligibility, assessed study quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. Outcomes were proportions of participants achieving a good outcome according to the presence or absence of each prognostic factor of interest. We intended to combine data with risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 182 studies with a total of 16,855 included participants investigating outcomes of surgery for epilepsy. Nine studies were RCTs (including two that randomised participants to surgery or medical treatment (99 participants included in the two trials received medical treatment)). Risk of bias in these RCTs was unclear or high. Most of the remaining 173 non-randomised studies followed a retrospective design. We assessed study quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool and determined that most studies provided moderate or weak evidence. For 29 studies reporting multivariate analyses, we used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and determined that very few studies were at low risk of bias across domains.In terms of freedom from seizures, two RCTs found surgery (n = 97) to be superior to medical treatment (n = 99); four found no statistically significant differences between anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) with or without corpus callosotomy (n = 60), between subtemporal or transsylvian approach to selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) (n = 47); between ATL, SAH and parahippocampectomy (n = 43) or between 2.5 cm and 3.5 cm ATL resection (n = 207). One RCT found total hippocampectomy to be superior to partial hippocampectomy (n = 70) and one found ATL to be superior to stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 58); and another provided data to show that for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, no significant differences in seizure outcomes were evident between those treated with resection of the epileptogenic zone and those treated with resection of the epileptogenic zone plus corpus callosotomy (n = 43). We judged evidence from the nine RCTs to be of moderate to very low quality due to lack of information reported about the randomised trial design and the restricted study populations.Of the 16,756 participants included in this review who underwent a surgical procedure, 10,696 (64%) achieved a good outcome from surgery; this ranged across studies from 13.5% to 92.5%. Overall, we found the quality of data in relation to recording of adverse events to be very poor.In total, 120 studies examined between one and eight prognostic factors in univariate analysis. We found the following prognostic factors to be associated with a better post-surgical seizure outcome: abnormal pre-operative MRI, no use of intracranial monitoring, complete surgical resection, presence of mesial temporal sclerosis, concordance of pre-operative MRI and electroencephalography, history of febrile seizures, absence of focal cortical dysplasia/malformation of cortical development, presence of tumour, right-sided resection, and presence of unilateral interictal spikes. We found no evidence that history of head injury, presence of encephalomalacia, presence of vascular malformation, and presence of postoperative discharges were prognostic factors of outcome.Twenty-nine studies reported multi-variable models of prognostic factors, and showed that the direction of association of factors with outcomes was generally the same as that found in univariate analyses.We observed variability in many of our analyses, likely due to small study sizes with unbalanced group sizes and variation in the definition of seizure outcome, the definition of prognostic factors, and the influence of the site of surgery AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Study design issues and limited information presented in the included studies mean that our results provide limited evidence to aid patient selection for surgery and prediction of likely surgical outcomes. Future research should be of high quality, follow a prospective design, be appropriately powered, and focus on specific issues related to diagnostic tools, the site-specific surgical approach, and other issues such as extent of resection. Researchers should investigate prognostic factors related to the outcome of surgery via multi-variable statistical regression modelling, where variables are selected for modelling according to clinical relevance, and all numerical results of the prognostic models are fully reported. Journal editors should not accept papers for which study authors did not record adverse events from a medical intervention. Researchers have achieved improvements in cancer care over the past three to four decades by answering well-defined questions through the conduct of focused RCTs in a step-wise fashion. The same approach to surgery for epilepsy is required.

Epilepsy Surgery in Children versus Adults

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorder affecting 6–7 per 1000 worldwide. Nearly one-third of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy continue to have recurrent seizures despite adequate trial of more than two anti-seizure drugs : drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Children with DRE often experience cognitive and psychosocial co-morbidities requiring more urgent and aggressive treatment than adults. Epilepsy surgery can result in seizure-freedom in approximately two-third of children with improvement in cognitive development and quality of life. Understanding fundamental differences in etiology, co-morbidity, and neural plasticity between children and adults is critical for appropriate selection of surgical candidates, appropriate presurgical evaluation and surgical approach, and improved overall outcome.

Successful hemispherotomy in two refractory epilepsy patients with cerebral hemiatrophy and contralateral EEG abnormalities

We describe two cases of refractory epilepsy with cerebral hemiatrophy and contralateral electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities, in which hemispherotomy of the atrophic hemisphere effectively controlled seizures. Case 1 was a 5-year-1-month-old girl with refractory bilateral asymmetrical tonic posturing seizures predominantly in the right arm. Magnetic resonance imaging showed left porencephaly corresponding to a left middle cerebral artery infarction. Case 2 was a 3-year-8-month-old boy with refractory bilateral asymmetrical tonic posturing seizures predominantly in the right arm due to atrophy of the left cerebral hemisphere after septic meningitis. Both patients had right hemiparesis and was incapable of pinching by the right hand. Contralateral interictal and ictal EEG abnormalities were observed. Interictal ^99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (^99mTc-ECD) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) showed hypoperfusion and ictal ^99mTc-ECD-SPECT showed hyperperfusion within the left cerebral hemisphere. Left hemispherotomy was performed. Cases 1 and 2 remained seizure-free at the last follow-up 18 months and 15 months, respectively, after surgery, and contralateral interictal EEG abnormalities disappeared. In patients with cerebral hemiatrophy and contralateral EEG abnormalities, epilepsy surgery may be considered when the laterality of seizure semiology, functional imaging findings and motor deficits were concordant with the atrophic side. Ictal SPECT is effective to confirm the epileptogenic hemisphere.

Functional hemispherectomy is safe and effective in adult patients with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Functional hemispherectomy (FH) is a well-established therapeutic option for children with epilepsy with parenchymal damage confined to one hemisphere, yet its application in adults remains rare. The intention of our study was to investigate postoperative clinical and epileptological outcome in adults who received FH for intractable epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 12 adult patients (18-56years) with intractable epilepsy due to unihemispheric pathology. All patients underwent FH. Postoperative neurological and cognitive outcome as well as seizure status were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 4.9years.

RESULTS

Ten patients (83%) were seizure-free (Engel I), and two (17%) had recurrent seizures at last follow-up. Apart from one patient requiring operative revision for bone flap infection, no perioperative morbidity or mortality occurred. Postoperative functional assessment revealed deterioration of motor function in 7 patients, whereas 5 remained unchanged. Language was unchanged in 8 patients. The absence of background slowing in preoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) as well as ictal and interictal EEG patterns located ipsilateral to the side of surgery was associated with favorable seizure outcome.

CONCLUSION

Favorable seizure control and acceptable functional outcome can be achieved by FH in adults with intractable epilepsy. The risk of postoperative deficits is moderate and even older patients are able to manage postoperative motor impairment. Therefore, FH should be considered in case of unihemispheric lesions also in adults.

Hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on seizure predictors and outcomes

OBJECT

Conflicting conclusions have been reported regarding several factors that may predict seizure outcomes after hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy. The goal of this study was to identify the possible predictors of seizure outcome by pooling the rates of postoperative seizure freedom found in the published literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified English-language articles published since 1970 that describe seizure outcomes in patients who underwent hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility and extracted the data. The authors pooled rates of seizure freedom from papers included in the study. Eight potential prognostic variables were identified and dichotomized for analyses. The authors also compared continuous variables within seizure-free and seizure-recurrent groups. Random- or fixed-effects models were used in the analyses depending on the presence or absence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The pooled seizure-free rate among the 1528 patients (from 56 studies) who underwent hemispheric surgery was 73%. Patients with an epilepsy etiology of developmental disorders, generalized seizures, nonlateralization on electroencephalography, and contralateral MRI abnormalities had reduced odds of being seizure-free after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemispheric surgery is an effective therapeutic modality for medically intractable epilepsy. This meta-analysis provides useful evidence-based information for the selection of candidates for hemispheric surgery, presurgical counseling, and explanation of seizure outcomes.

Surgery for epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Focal epilepsies are caused by a malfunction of nerve cells localised in one part of one cerebral hemisphere. In studies, estimates of the number of individuals with focal epilepsy who do not become seizure-free despite optimal drug therapy vary according to the age of the participants and which focal epilepsies are included, but have been reported as at least 20% and in some studies up to 70%. If the epileptogenic zone can be located surgical resection offers the chance of a cure with a corresponding increase in quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to assess the overall outcome of epilepsy surgery according to evidence from randomised controlled trials.The secondary objectives are to assess the overall outcome of epilepsy surgery according to non-randomised evidence and to identify the factors that correlate to remission of seizures postoperatively.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (June 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 6), MEDLINE (Ovid) (2001 to 4 July 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant trials up to 4 July 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or case series, with either a prospective and/or retrospective design, including at least 30 participants, a well-defined population (age, sex, seizure type/frequency, duration of epilepsy, aetiology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis, surgical findings), an MRI performed in at least 90% of cases and an expected duration of follow-up of at least one year, and reporting an outcome relating to postoperative seizure control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three groups of two review authors independently screened all references for eligibility, assessed study quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. Outcomes were proportion of participants achieving a good outcome according to the presence or absence of each prognostic factor of interest. We intended to combine data with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 177 studies (16,253 participants) investigating the outcome of surgery for epilepsy. Four studies were RCTs (including one that randomised participants to surgery or medical treatment). The risk of bias in the RCTs was unclear or high, limiting our confidence in the evidence that addressed the primary review objective. Most of the remaining 173 non-randomised studies had a retrospective design; they were of variable size, were conducted in a range of countries, recruited a wide demographic range of participants, used a wide range of surgical techniques and used different scales used to measure outcomes. We performed quality assessment using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool and determined that most studies provided moderate or weak evidence. For 29 studies reporting multivariate analyses we used the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and determined that very few studies were at low risk of bias across the domains.In terms of freedom from seizures, one RCT found surgery to be superior to medical treatment, two RCTs found no statistically significant difference between anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) with or without corpus callosotomy or between 2.5 cm or 3.5 cm ATL resection, and one RCT found total hippocampectomy to be superior to partial hippocampectomy. We judged the evidence from the four RCTs to be of moderate to very low quality due to the lack of information reported about the randomised trial design and the restricted study populations.Of the 16,253 participants included in this review, 10,518 (65%) achieved a good outcome from surgery; this ranged across studies from 13.5% to 92.5%. Overall, we found the quality of data in relation to the recording of adverse events to be very poor.In total, 118 studies examined between one and eight prognostic factors in univariate analysis. We found the following prognostic factors to be associated with a better post-surgical seizure outcome: an abnormal pre-operative MRI, no use of intracranial monitoring, complete surgical resection, presence of mesial temporal sclerosis, concordance of pre-operative MRI and electroencephalography (EEG), history of febrile seizures, absence of focal cortical dysplasia/malformation of cortical development, presence of tumour, right-sided resection and presence of unilateral interictal spikes. We found no evidence that history of head injury, presence of encephalomalacia, presence of vascular malformation or presence of postoperative discharges were prognostic factors of outcome. We observed variability between studies for many of our analyses, likely due to the small study sizes with unbalanced group sizes, variation in the definition of seizure outcome, definition of the prognostic factor and the influence of the site of surgery, all of which we observed to be related to postoperative seizure outcome. Twenty-nine studies reported multivariable models of prognostic factors and the direction of association of factors with outcome was generally the same as found in the univariate analyses. However, due to the different multivariable analysis approaches and selective reporting of results, meaningful comparison of multivariate analysis with univariate meta-analysis is difficult.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The study design issues and limited information presented in the included studies mean that our results provide limited evidence to aid patient selection for surgery and prediction of likely surgical outcome. Future research should be of high quality, have a prospective design, be appropriately powered and focus on specific issues related to diagnostic tools, the site-specific surgical approach and other issues such as the extent of resection. Prognostic factors related to the outcome of surgery should be investigated via multivariable statistical regression modelling, where variables are selected for modelling according to clinical relevance and all numerical results of the prognostic models are fully reported. Protocols should include pre- and postoperative measures of speech and language function, cognition and social functioning along with a mental state assessment. Journal editors should not accept papers where adverse events from a medical intervention are not recorded. Improvements in the development of cancer care over the past three to four decades have been achieved by answering well-defined questions through the conduct of focused RCTs in a step-wise fashion. The same approach to surgery for epilepsy is required.

Fifty consecutive hemispherectomies: outcomes, evolution of technique, complications, and lessons learned

BACKGROUND

Techniques for achieving hemispheric disconnection in patients with epilepsy continue to evolve.

OBJECTIVE

To review the outcomes of the first 50 hemispherectomy surgeries performed by a single surgeon with an emphasis on outcomes, complications, and how these results led to changes in practice.

METHODS

The first 50 hemispherectomy cases performed by the lead author were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical outcomes, and complications were critically reviewed.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2012, 50 patients underwent hemispherectomy surgery (mean follow-up time, 3.5 years). Modified lateral hemispherotomy became the preferred technique and was performed on 44 patients. Forty patients (80%) achieved complete seizure freedom (Engel I). Presurgical and postsurgical neuropsychological evaluations demonstrated cognitive stability. Two cases were performed for palliation only. Previous hemispherectomy surgery was associated with worsened seizure outcome (2 of 6 seizure free; P .005). The use of Avitene was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus (56% vs 18%; P = .03). In modified lateral hemispherotomy patients without the use of Avitene, the incidence of hydrocephalus was 13%. Complications included infection (n = 3), incomplete disconnection requiring reoperation (n = 1), reversible ischemic neurological deficit (n = 1), and craniosynostosis (n = 1). There were no (unanticipated) permanent neurological deficits or deaths. Minor technique modifications were made in response to specific complications.

CONCLUSION

The modified lateral hemispherotomy is effective and safe for both initial and revision hemispherectomy surgery. Avitene use appears to result in a greater incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus.

Hemispherectomy in the treatment of seizures: a review

The term hemispherectomy refers to the complete removal or functional disconnection of a cerebral hemisphere. The technique was initially developed over 85 years ago to treat infiltrating brain tumors but is now used exclusively for medically refractory epilepsy. Hemispherectomy surgery has progressed from an extremely morbid procedure fraught with complications to a fairly routine one performed at most pediatric epilepsy centers with relatively low risk and great efficacy. The author reviews the history and evolution of hemispherectomy surgery, the relevant pathological conditions, as well as outcomes and complications.

Reoperative Hemispherectomy for Intractable Epilepsy

BACKGROUND:

In patients with medically intractable epilepsy and diffuse unilateral hemispheric disease, functional or disconnective hemispherectomy is a widely accepted and successful treatment option. If recurrent seizures develop after disconnective hemispherectomy, management options become more complex and include conversion to anatomic hemispherectomy.

OBJECTIVE:

To present the outcomes of all patients undergoing reoperative hemispherectomy in 1 institution by 1 surgeon since 1998.

METHODS:

The medical records, operative reports, and imaging studies for 36 patients undergoing reoperative hemispherectomy for continuing medically intractable epilepsy from 1998 to 2011 at Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. Patient characteristics, cause of seizure, imaging findings, surgery-related complications, and long-term seizure outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Patients presented with a variety of seizure origins, including Rasmussen encephalitis, perinatal infarction, cortical dysplasia, and hemimegalencephaly. Overall, 19% of patients were seizure free after conversion to anatomic hemispherectomy, and 45% reported a decrease in seizure frequency by ≥ 90%. An additional 36% reported no improvement. Generalized ictal electroencephalography tended to confer a poorer prognosis, as did cortical dysplasia as the underlying diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

The possibility that residual epileptogenic tissue in the operated hemisphere remains connected should be considered after failed functional hemispherectomy because our data suggest that improvement in seizure frequency is possible after reoperative hemispherectomy, although the chance of obtaining seizure freedom is relatively low. The decision to proceed with reoperative hemispherectomy should be made after proper discussion with the patient and family and informed consent is given.