Clinical phenotypes within non-surgical patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy caused by hippocampal sclerosis based on response to antiepileptic drugs

Long-term outcome of treatment-naïve patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: A retrospective study in a single center

PURPOSE

This study aimed to describe long-term treatment outcomes of treatment-naïve patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of treatment-naïve patients with MTLE-HS who visited the Yonsei Epilepsy Clinic from April 2000 to April 2022 and were followed up for at least 2 years. Seizure freedom (SF) was defined as no seizures or auras only for >1 year, and complete SF was defined as no seizures including auras for >1 year.

RESULTS

Eighty-four treatment-naïve patients with MTLE-HS with a median follow-up of 122 months were included. Except for one patient who underwent early surgical treatment, of the remaining 83 patients, 31 (37.3 %) achieved SF and remained in remission, 38 (45.8 %) had fluctuations in seizure control, and 14 (16.9 %) never achieved SF. Additionally, 18 (21.7 %) patients achieved complete SF and remained in remission, 42 (50.6 %) showed fluctuations, and 23 (27.7 %) never achieved complete SF. Fifty-three (63.9 %) patients achieved SF and 34 (41.0 %) achieved complete SF at their last visit. Older age at epilepsy onset, male sex, low pretreatment seizure density, history of central nervous system infection before age 5, absence of aura, and fewer antiseizure medications in the final regimen were associated with favorable outcome. Of the 84 patients, 11 (13.1 %) underwent temporal lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical treatment outcomes in treatment-naïve MTLE-HS were relatively better than previously reported outcomes in MTLE-HS, although frequent fluctuations in seizure control were observed.

The Most Common Lesions Detected by Neuroimaging as Causes of Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by chronic, unprovoked and recurrent seizures, which are the result of rapid and excessive bioelectric discharges in nerve cells. Neuroimaging is used to detect underlying structural abnormalities which may be associated with epilepsy. This paper reviews the most common abnormalities, such as hippocampal sclerosis, malformations of cortical development and vascular malformation, detected by neuroimaging in patients with epilepsy to help understand the correlation between these changes and the course, treatment and prognosis of epilepsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveals structural changes in the brain which are described in this review. Recent studies indicate the usefulness of additional imaging techniques. The use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) improves surgical outcomes in MRI-negative cases of focal cortical dysplasia. Some techniques, such as quantitative image analysis, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and fibre tract reconstruction, can detect small malformations—which means that some of the epilepsies can be treated surgically. Quantitative susceptibility mapping may become the method of choice in vascular malformations. Neuroimaging determines appropriate diagnosis and treatment and helps to predict prognosis.

Drug-responsive versus drug-refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a single-center prospective outcome study

Objectives: To evaluate clinical, electrophysiological, and neuroradiological factors which correlate with the prognosis in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Methods: This was a single-center prospective outcome study in patients with MTLE. The patients' family history, clinical characteristics, neurophysiological data (electroencephalography - EEG), neuroimaging, antiepileptic therapy, and outcome were collected and analyzed. The population was divided into four groups depending on the frequency of the seizures when they attended their last follow up. All variables and outcome measures were compared between the four groups. Results: In total 83 consecutive patients were included within the four groups. Group 1 (seizure-free) consisted of 7 patients, (9%), Group 2 (rare seizures) consisted of 15 patients (18%), Group 3 (often seizures) consisted of 30 patients (36%), and Group 4 (very often seizures) consisted of 31 patients (37%). The groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics. There was a strong positive correlation between resistance to therapy and sleep activation on EEG (p = 0.005), occurrence of focal to bilateral seizures (p = 0.007), automatisms (p = 0.004), and the number of previously used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (p = 0.002). There was no association between febrile convulsions (FC), hippocampal sclerosis (HS), and the outcome that was found. Conclusion: MTLE is a heterogeneous syndrome. Establishing the factors responsible for, and associated with, drug resistance is important for optimal management and treatment, as early identification of drug resistance should then ensure a timely referral for surgical treatment is made. This prospective study shows that sleep activation on EEG, ictal automatisms, occurrence of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and increased number of tried AEDs are negative prognostic factors.

Is there a place for surgical treatment of nonpharmacoresistant epilepsy?

Epilepsy surgery has been shown to be the best possible treatment in well-defined and difficult-to-treat epilepsy syndromes, such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis, even early in the course of the disease if pharmacoresistance is proven. This review addresses the question if epilepsy surgery may be justified today even in nonpharmacoresistant cases. There are two possible groups of patients: first, there are epilepsy syndromes with a benign spontaneous course or with a potentially good treatment prognosis under appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Second, there are epilepsies with potentially worse AED treatment prognosis in which appropriate AED treatment has not yet been applied because of the short course of the disease, tolerability problems that prevented usually effective dosing, or adherence issues. In group one, the good spontaneous prognosis or the usually satisfying course under AED treatment in line with the commonly generalized underlying epileptogenesis does not suggest that epilepsy surgery is a realistic alternative, not even in cases with distinct focal clinical and/or electroencephalography (EEG) patterns like in Rolandic epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. In the second group, the recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition should allow assessment of individual pharmacoresistance early after the onset of the disease in order to avoid any delay. Concerns about a potential disease-specific or drug-specific cognitive decline that could be avoided in early surgery are speculative, a matter of controversial discussion, and certainly not relevant, if pharmacoresistance is consequently addressed in time according to the ILAE recommendations. One should also not forget that even in typically pharmacoresistant epilepsy syndromes that are suitable for surgical procedures, satisfying courses do exist that would not require early or any epilepsy surgery. Therefore, in almost any instance, epilepsy surgery as initial treatment or immediately after a first AED is still not recommended although, especially in cases with nonadherence to AEDs, it may be occasionally considered in order to outweigh the risks of ongoing seizures and epilepsy if surgery is not performed.

Pharmacoresistance with newer anti-epileptic drugs in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis

This study aims to evaluate the overall prognosis, prognostic factors, and efficacy of treatment in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) who have access to third generation anti-epileptic drugs but not to epilepsy surgery. Eighty-five MTLE-HS patients were retrospectively placed into a seizure-free (seizure-free for >1year) or drug-resistant group, and the two groups were compared on the basis of age, sex, age at onset of seizures, duration of epilepsy, side of lesion, handedness, EEG findings, history of CNS infection, history of febrile convulsions, history of head trauma, history of cognitive impairment, family history of seizures, number of current anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), total number of AED trials, and presence of individual AEDs. Only 24.7% of MTLE-HS patients had achieved seizure freedom for >1 year. Poor prognosis and drug-resistance were associated with younger age at onset of seizures (p=0.002), longer duration of epilepsy (p=0.018), greater number of current AEDs (p<0.001), and greater total number of AED trials (p<0.001). In addition, regimens with newer AEDs had no greater efficacy than regimens with older AEDs. Most medically managed MTLE-HS patients do not achieve seizure freedom despite multiple AED trials, and treatment with third generation AEDs should not preclude evaluation for epilepsy surgery.

Importance of neuropsychological and clinical features to predict seizure control in medically treated patients with mesial temporal epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

It is not yet understood why seizures in certain patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) develop resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) while others achieve good seizure control with this treatment. We analyzed clinical and neuropsychological features associated with seizure control in patients with MTLE-HS who had not undergone resective surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 40 patients with medically treated MTLE-HS and retrospectively collected the following data from prospective databases: sex, febrile seizures, central nervous system infection, history of head trauma, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disturbances, history of status epilepticus, age at onset of epilepsy, aura, seizure type and frequency, electroencephalography abnormalities, HS side, AEDs, global cognitive status, and neuropsychological functions such as cognitive processing speed, attention and executive functions, verbal and visual memory, language, and visuospatial ability. These factors were compared between patients who achieved seizure control (no seizures or a >50% reduction in seizure frequency) with AED treatment and those who continued with poor seizure control (increase or no change in frequency or <50% reduction) after starting treatment.

RESULTS

The factors associated with poor seizure control in the multivariate analysis were >2seizures per month before treatment (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.8, p=0.04), moderate or severe cognitive impairment (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-7.6, p=0.02), and impairment of >2 neuropsychological functions (OR 2.88, 95% CI 2-6.6, p=0.04). No associations were observed between poor seizure control and specific neuropsychological function impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor seizure control in MTLE-HS is associated with moderate-severe cognitive impairment but not with a specific profile of impairment. Recognizing poor prognostic features such as a high frequency of monthly seizures prior to starting AED treatment could help to identify patients with medically intractable MTLE-HS who may be good candidates for early epilepsy surgery.