Semiology of subtle motor phenomena in critically ill patients

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE (p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology (p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function (p = 0.002), reduced SE duration (p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications (p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Comparison of Continuous Intracortical and Scalp Electroencephalography in Comatose Patients with Acute Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Depth electroencephalography (dEEG) is a recent invasive monitoring technique used in patients with acute brain injury. This study aimed to describe in detail the clinical manifestations of nonconvulsive seizures (NCSzs) with and without a surface EEG correlate, analyze their long-standing effects, and provide data that contribute to understanding the significance of certain scalp EEG patterns observed in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled a cohort of 33 adults with severe acute brain injury admitted to the neurological intensive care unit. All of them underwent multimodal invasive monitoring, including dEEG. All patients were scanned on a 3T magnetic resonance imaging scanner at 6 months after hospital discharge, and mesial temporal atrophy (MTA) was calculated using a visual scale.

RESULTS

In 21 (65.6%) of 32 study participants, highly epileptiform intracortical patterns were observed. A total of 11 (34.3%) patients had electrographic or electroclinical seizures in the dEEG, of whom 8 had both spontaneous and stimulus-induced (SI) seizures, and 3 patients had only spontaneous intracortical seizures. An unequivocal ictal scalp correlate was observed in only 3 (27.2%) of the 11 study participants. SI-NCSzs occurred during nursing care, medical procedures, and family visits. Subtle clinical manifestations, such as restlessness, purposeless stereotyped movements of the upper limbs, ventilation disturbances, jerks, head movements, hyperextension posturing, chewing, and oroalimentary automatisms, occurred during intracortical electroclinical seizures. MTA was detected in 18 (81.8%) of the 22 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with MTA with and without seizures or status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS

Most NCSzs in critically ill comatose patients remain undetectable on scalp EEG. SI-NCSzs frequently occur during nursing care, medical procedures, and family visits. Semiology of NCSzs included ictal minor signs and subtle symptoms, such as breathing pattern changes manifested as patient-ventilator dyssynchrony.

Recent advances in clinical electroencephalography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical electroencephalography (EEG) is a conservative medical field. This explains likely the significant gap between clinical practice and new research developments. This narrative review discusses possible causes of this discrepancy and how to circumvent them. More specifically, we summarize recent advances in three applications of clinical EEG: source imaging (ESI), high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and EEG in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently published studies on ESI provide further evidence for the accuracy and clinical utility of this method in the multimodal presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and opened new possibilities for further improvement of the accuracy. HFOs have received much attention as a novel biomarker in epilepsy. However, recent studies questioned their clinical utility at the level of individual patients. We discuss the impediments, show up possible solutions and highlight the perspectives of future research in this field. EEG in the ICU has been one of the major driving forces in the development of clinical EEG. We review the achievements and the limitations in this field.

SUMMARY

This review will promote clinical implementation of recent advances in EEG, in the fields of ESI, HFOs and EEG in the intensive care.

Status epilepticus in the ICU

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.

Continuous Electroencephalogram Evaluation of Paroxysmal Events in Critically Ill Patients: Diagnostic Yield and Impact on Clinical Decision Making

BACKGROUND

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring has been widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the evaluation of patients in the ICU with altered consciousness to detect nonconvulsive seizures. We investigated the yield of cEEG when used to evaluate paroxysmal events in patients in the ICU and assessed the predictors of a diagnostic findings. The clinical impact of cEEG was also evaluated in this study.

METHODS

We identified patients in the ICU who underwent cEEG monitoring (> 6 h) to evaluate paroxysmal events between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. We extracted patient demographics, medical history, neurological examination, brain imaging results, and the description of the paroxysmal events that necessitated the monitoring. We dichotomized the cEEG studies into those that captured habitual nonepileptic events or revealed epileptiform discharges (ictal or interictal), i.e., those considered to be of positive diagnostic yield (Y +), and those studies that did not show those findings (negative diagnostic yield, Y -). We also assessed the clinical impact of cEEG by documenting changes in administered antiseizure medication (ASM) before and after the cEEG.

RESULTS

We identified 159 recordings that were obtained for the indication of paroxysmal events, of which abnormal movements constituted the majority (n = 123). For the remaining events (n = 36), descriptions included gaze deviations, speech changes, and sensory changes. Twenty-nine percent (46 of 159) of the recordings were Y + , including the presence of ictal or interictal epileptiform discharges (n = 33), and captured habitual nonepileptic events (n = 13). A history of epilepsy was the only predictor of the study outcome. Detection of abnormal findings occurred within 6 h of the recording in most patients (30 of 46, 65%). Overall, cEEG studies led to 49 (31%) changes in ASM administration. The changes included dosage increases or initiation of ASM in patients with epileptiform discharges (n = 28) and reduction or elimination of ASM in patients with either habitual nonepileptic events (n = 5) or Y - cEEG studies (n = 16).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous electroencephalogram monitoring is valuable in evaluating paroxysmal events, with a diagnostic yield of 29% in critically ill patients. A history of epilepsy predicts diagnostic studies. Both Y + and Y - cEEG studies may directly impact clinical decisions by leading to ASMs changes.

Clinical features of catatonic non-convulsive status epilepticus: A systematic review of cases

OBJECTIVE

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) can manifest as catatonia, although it is unclear how frequently such cases have been reported. The common clinical features of these two conditions are also unclear.

METHODS

Using the MEDLINE and Embase databases, we performed a systematic literature search to identify cases diagnosed with both catatonia, according to the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale, and NCSE, according to the Salzburg Consensus Criteria (last search: March 29, 2021). We extracted data on demographics, clinical features of catatonia, EEG findings, and treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients with catatonic NSCE (men, 49%; mean age, 42.0 years) were identified from our search. Of the 66 cases described: 30 (46%) showed motor symptoms; 35 (38%) occurred in patients with preceding episodes of epileptic seizures; 19 (29%) showed subtle ictal clinical phenomena, such as minor twitching of the mouth, periorbital region, and extremities; 22 (33%) presented with psychiatric symptoms prior to the onset of catatonia; 17 (26%) had a history of psychiatric diseases; and in 10 cases (15%), NSCE was confirmed by intentional or non-intentional long-term EEG monitoring. Benzodiazepines were used as the initial treatment for NCSE in 30 cases (49%), of which 20 cases (73%) improved with monotherapy.

DISCUSSION

A substantial number of cases included in the present review involved catatonia without any symptoms indicative of epilepsy, suggesting that NCSE may be misdiagnosed as a psychiatric disease, and highlighting the importance of the accurate diagnosis and treatment of NCSE in patients presenting with catatonia.

What's new on EEG monitoring in the ICU

Continuous video-EEG (cEEG, lasting hours to several days) is increasingly used in ICU patients, as it is more sensitive than routine video-EEG (rEEG, lasting 20-30 min) to detect seizures or status epilepticus, and allows more frequent changes in therapeutic regimens. However, cEEG is more resource-consuming, and its relationship to outcome compared to repeated rEEG has only been formally assessed very recently in a randomized controlled trial, which did not show any significant difference in terms of long-term mortality or functional outcome. Awaiting more refined trials, it seems therefore that using repeated rEEG in ICU patients may represent a reasonable alternative in resource-limited settings. Prolonged EEG has been used recently in patients with severe COVID-19 infection, the proportion of seizures seems albeit relatively low, and similar to ICU patients with medical conditions. As in any case a timely EEG recording is recommended in the ICU, r ecent technical developments may ease its use in clinical practice.

Quantitative Infrared Pupillometry in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a frequent disorder in neurocritical care and diagnosing it can be challenging. NCSE patients often show altered pupil function, but nature and extent may vary. Infrared pupillometry allows detection of subtle changes of pupil function. The neurological pupil index (NPi) is considered a surrogate marker of global pupil function which is supposed to be independent of absolute parameters such as the pupil diameter.

OBJECTIVE

Cross-sectional observational study to assess whether NPi is altered in NCSE.

METHODS

128 consecutive adult emergency patients who had experienced a suspected seizure, have not reached their prior functional level regarding level of consciousness, mental status or focal deficits, had no obvious clinical signs of status epilepticus and had an EEG indication as determined by the treating clinician for exclusion of NCSE were examined by routine EEG and pupillometry. Exclusion criteria were ocular comorbidity (n = 21) and poor EEG quality (n = 4). Pupillometry was performed once directly before the beginning of EEG recording. NCSE diagnosis (no NCSE, possible NCSE and confirmed NCSE) was established according to Salzburg consensus criteria blinded to pupillometry results. Group comparison was performed for right NPi, left NPi, lowest NPi of both sides (minNPi) and the absolute difference of both sides (diffNPi) applying non-parametric testing. In post-hoc analysis, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of NCSE diagnosis (combined confirmed NCSE and possible NCSE) were performed for minNPi and diffNPi.

RESULTS

From 103 patients included in the final analysis, 5 (4.9%) had confirmed NCSE, 7 (6.8%) had possible NCSE. Right NPi (p = 0.002), left NPi (p < 0.001) and minNPi (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in "confirmed NCSE" and "possible NCSE" compared to "no NCSE"; diffNPi was significantly higher in "confirmed NCSE" and "possible NCSE" compared to "no NCSE" (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference of minNPi and diffNPi between "confirmed NCSE" and "possible NCSE". ROC analysis showed an optimal cut-off of minNPi for NCSE diagnosis of 4.0 (AUC = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-0.99). Optimal ROC analysis cut-off of diffNPi for NCSE diagnosis was 0.2 (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

NPi was significantly reduced and the difference between left and right NPi was significantly higher in confirmed NCSE. An NPi < 4.0 on either side as well as an NPi difference of both sides > 0.2 may be potential indicators of NCSE. Infrared pupillometry may be a helpful diagnostic tool in the assessment of NCSE and should be studied further in larger populations.

Non-convulsive status epilepticus: mimics and chameleons

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is an enigmatic condition with protean manifestations. It often goes unrecognised, leading to delays in its diagnosis and treatment. The principal reason for such delay is the failure to consider and request an electroencephalogram (EEG), although occasional presentations have no scalp or surface electroencephalographic correlate. In certain settings with limited EEG availability, particularly out-of-hours, clinicians should consider treating without an EEG. Patients need a careful risk–benefit analysis to assess the risks of neuronal damage and harm versus the risks of adverse effects from various intensities of therapeutic intervention. Specialists in EEG, intensive care or epilepsy are invaluable in the management of patients with possible NCSE.

An update on the recognition and treatment of non-convulsive status epilepticus in the intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a complex and diverse condition which is often an under-recognised entity in the intensive care unit. When NCSE is identified the optimal treatment strategy is not always clear. Areas covered: This review is based on a literature review of the key literature in the field over the last 5-10 years. The articles were selected based on their importance to the field by the authors. Expert commentary: This review discusses the complex situations when a neurological consultation may occur in a critical care setting and provides an update on the latest evidence regarding the recognition of NCSE and the decision making around determining the aggressiveness of treatment. It also considers the ictal-interictal continuum of conditions which may be met with, particularly in the era of continuous EEG, and provides an approach for dealing with these. Suggestions for how the field will develop are discussed.