1
|
Pascarella A, Manzo L, Gasparini S, Marsico O, Abelardo D, Torino C, Cianci V, Iudice A, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Caggia E, D'Aniello A, Di Bonaventura C, DiFrancesco JC, Domina E, Dono F, Gambardella A, Fortunato F, Marini C, Marrelli A, Matricardi S, Morano A, Paladin F, Renna R, Piccioli M, Striano P, Ascoli M, La Neve A, Le Piane E, Orsini A, Di Gennaro G, Aguglia U, Ferlazzo E. Perampanel in post-stroke epilepsy: Clinical practice data from the PERampanel as Only Concomitant antiseizure medication (PEROC) study. J Neurol Sci 2024; 462:123106. [PMID: 38925069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence regarding the clinical profile of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in PSE. This study aims to evaluate the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on treatment in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. METHODS We performed a subgroup analysis of PSE patients included in a previous retrospective, longitudinal, multicentre observational study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency and adverse events were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted. RESULTS Our analysis included 56 individuals with PSE, characterized by varying initial treatment modalities and timeframes relative to disease onset. We found notable retention rates (92.8%, 83.7%, and 69% at 3, 6, and 12 months), with treatment withdrawal mainly due to poor tolerability. One year after PER introduction, seizure frequency significantly reduced, with a responder rate (≥50% reduction) of 83.9% and a seizure-free rate of 51.6%. Adverse events occurred in 25 (46.3%) patients, mainly dizziness, irritability, and behavioural disorders. No major statistical differences were found between early (30 patients, 53.6%) and late add-on groups, except for a higher 6-month responder rate in the early add-on group. CONCLUSION Adjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. Perampanel demonstrated good efficacy and safety as both early and late add-on treatment, making it a compelling option for this unique patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Pascarella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Lucia Manzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Sara Gasparini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Oreste Marsico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Domenico Abelardo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Claudia Torino
- Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension of Reggio Calabria, National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Vittoria Cianci
- Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Alfonso Iudice
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Neurology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Full Member of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE), Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Fedele Dono
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonio Gambardella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Fortunato
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carla Marini
- Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marrelli
- Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Morano
- Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Renna
- Neurological Clinic and Stroke Unit, "Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marta Piccioli
- UOC Neurology, PO San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Angela La Neve
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche di Base, Neuroscienze e Organi di Senso, Università di Bari
| | - Emilio Le Piane
- Dipartimento di Neurologia, Ospedale Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro Orsini
- Pediatric Neurology, Pediatric Department, AOUP Santa Chiara Univeristy Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Di Gennaro
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Scuola di Medicina, Università Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Italy; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu W, Pu B, Wang S, Li M, An Y, Lian J, Wang Y. Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between cardiovascular diseases and frozen shoulder. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:116. [PMID: 38310246 PMCID: PMC10837867 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04600-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although prior observational studies indicate an association between cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and frozen shoulder (FS), the potential causal relationship between them remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the genetic causal relationship between CVDs and FS using Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS Genetic variations closely associated with FS were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium. Summary data for CVD, including atrial fibrillation (AF), coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and ischemic stroke (IS), were sourced from several large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). MR analysis was performed using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger, and weighted median methods. IVW, as the primary MR analysis method, complemented by other sensitivity analyses, was utilized to validate the robustness of the results. Further reverse MR analysis was conducted to explore the presence of reverse causal relationships. RESULTS In the forward MR analysis, genetically determined risk of stroke and IS was positively associated with FS (OR [95% CI] = 1.58 (1.23-2.03), P < 0.01; OR [95% CI] = 1.46 (1.16-1.85), P < 0.01, respectively). There was no strong evidence of an effect of genetically predicted other CVDs on FS risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. In the reverse MR analysis, no causal relationships were observed between FS and various CVDs. CONCLUSION The study suggests that stroke increases the risk of developing FS. However, further basic and clinical research is needed to substantiate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WeiSong Lu
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Bin Pu
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sen Wang
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - MengZe Li
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue An
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Lian
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - YongQuan Wang
- Luzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elschot EP, Joore MA, Rouhl RPW, Lamberts RJ, Backes WH, Jansen JFA. The added value of risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment for epileptic seizures after stroke: An early-HTA analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 151:109594. [PMID: 38159505 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is related to a worse clinical outcome in stroke patients. Adding a biomarker to the clinical diagnostic process for the prediction of PSE may help to establish targeted and personalized treatment for high-risk patients, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. We assessed the added value of a risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment by conducting an early Health Technology Assessment. METHODS Interviews were conducted with four relevant stakeholders in the field of PSE to obtain a realistic view of the current healthcare and their opinions on the potential value of a PSE risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment. The consequences on quality of life and costs of current care of a hypothetical care pathway with perfect risk assessment were modeled based on information from a literature review and the input from the stakeholders. Subsequently, the maximum added value (the headroom) was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of this result to variation in assumed input parameters, i.e. the accuracy of the risk assessment, the efficacy of anti-seizure medication (ASM), and the probability of patients expected to develop PSE. RESULTS All stakeholders considered the addition of a predictive biomarker for the risk assessment of PSE to be of value. The headroom amounted to €12,983. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the headroom remained beneficial when varying the accuracy of the risk assessment, the ASM efficacy, and the number of patients expected to develop PSE. DISCUSSION We showed that a risk assessment for PSE development is potentially valuable. This work demonstrates that it is worthwhile to undertake clinical studies to evaluate biomarkers for the prediction of patients at high risk for PSE and to assess the value of targeted prophylactic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elles P Elschot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob P W Rouhl
- MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J Lamberts
- MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Walter H Backes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus F A Jansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sauer V, Glaser M, Ellwardt E, Saryyeva A, Krauss JK, Ringel F, Groppa S, Winter Y. Favorable combinations of antiseizure medication with vagus nerve stimulation to improve health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 150:109562. [PMID: 38071825 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a non-pharmacological treatment of refractory epilepsy, which also has an antidepressive effect. The favorable combinations of VNS with specific mechanisms of action of antiseizure medication (ASM) on mood and health-related quality of life (HrQol) have not yet been studied. The objective was to identify favourable combinations of specific ASMs with VNS for the HrQoL and depression in refractory epilepsy. METHODS We performed an observational study including patients with refractory epilepsy and an implanted VNS (N = 151). In the first 24 months after VNS implantation, all patients were on stable ASM therapy. We used the standardized questionnaires QOLIE10, EQVAS and EQ5D to evaluate HrQoL as well as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the synergistic combinations of ASM with VNS for HrQoL. RESULTS At the year-two follow-up (N = 151, age 45.2 ± 17.0 years), significant improvement (p < 0.05) in BDI scores was found for combination of VNS with SV2A modulators (58.4 %) or AMPA antagonists (44.4 %). A significant increase of HrQoL by at least 30 % (p < 0.05) was measured for a combination of VNS with SV2A modulators (brivaracetam, levetiracetam) or slow sodium channel inhibitors (eslicarbazepine, lacosamide). CONCLUSION The results of our study suggests a favorable effect of the combination of SV2A modulators or slow sodium channel inhibitors with VNS on the HrQoL in comparison to other ASMs. Besides the possible synergistic effects on the seizure frequency, the amelioration of behavioral side effects of SV2A modulators by VNS is an important factor of HrQoL-improvement in these combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Sauer
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
| | - Martin Glaser
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Erik Ellwardt
- Department of Neurology, Helios-HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Assel Saryyeva
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Yaroslav Winter
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winter Y, Sandner K, Vieth T, Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Stuckrad-Barre SV, Groppa S. Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study. CNS Drugs 2023; 37:929-936. [PMID: 37784006 PMCID: PMC10570217 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke. METHODS Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records. RESULTS Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs). CONCLUSIONS Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaroslav Winter
- Department of Neurology, Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Sandner
- Department of Neurology, Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Vieth
- Rudolf Frey Educational Clinic, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Department of Neurology, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Sergiu Groppa
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Department of Neurology, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Celdran de Castro A, Nascimento FA, Beltran-Corbellini Á, Toledano R, Garcia-Morales I, Gil-Nagel A, Aledo-Serrano Á. Levetiracetam, from broad-spectrum use to precision prescription: A narrative review and expert opinion. Seizure 2023; 107:121-131. [PMID: 37023625 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) whose mechanism of action involves the modulation of neurotransmitters release through binding to the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. It is a broad-spectrum ASM displaying favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles. Since its introduction in 1999, it has been widely prescribed, becoming the first-line treatment for numerous epilepsy syndromes and clinical scenarios. However, this might have resulted in overuse. Increasing evidence, including the recently published SANAD II trials, suggests that other ASMs are reasonable therapeutic options for generalized and focal epilepsies. Not infrequently, these ASMs show better safety and effectiveness profiles compared to LEV (partially due to the latter's well-known cognitive and behavioral adverse effects, present in up to 20% of patients). Moreover, it has been shown that the underlying etiology of epilepsy is significantly linked to ASMs response in particular scenarios, highlighting the importance of an etiology-based ASM choice. In the case of LEV, it has demonstrated an optimal effectiveness in Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, and PCDH19-related epilepsies whereas, in other etiologies such as malformations of cortical development, it may show negligible effects. This narrative review analyzes the current evidence related to the use of LEV for the treatment of seizures. Illustrative clinical scenarios and practical decision-making approaches are also addressed, therefore aiming to define a rational use of this ASM.
Collapse
|
7
|
Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Adults: A Prospective Observational Study. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:1113-1119. [PMID: 36178588 PMCID: PMC9550753 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00954-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a novel sodium channel blocker, is approved for mono and adjunctive treatment of partial epileptic seizures with or without secondary generalization. Its efficacy in primary generalized seizures has not yet been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESL in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in an observational study. METHODS The data were collected from a prospective population-based register. Effectiveness was measured as relative reduction in standardized seizure frequency (SSF), responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in SSF), and seizure freedom rate at 6 and 12 months after initiation of ESL. Safety and tolerability were evaluated using patients' diaries. RESULTS Fifty-six adult patients with PGTCS were treated with ESL as adjunctive therapy. Of these, 30.4% (n = 17) had myoclonic seizures in addition to PGTCS. The retention rate after 12 months was 80.4% (n = 45). After initiating ESL therapy, reduction in SSF for PGTCS on ESL was 56.0% after 6 months and 56.9% after 12 months (p < 0.01), whereas myoclonic seizures did not show any significant improvement in frequency. The responder rate for PGTCS was 64.3% after 6 months and 66.1% after 12 months, and seizure freedom was achieved in 32.1% and 35.7%, respectively. Forty-three patients (73.2%) reported no side effects. Among the reported side effects of ESL therapy, headache (7.1%), dizziness (8.9%), tiredness (7.1%), nausea (5.4%), and hyponatremia (5.4%) were the most prevalent. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that ESL may provide additional benefits in the treatment of patients with PGTCS and motivate randomized controlled trials in this indication.
Collapse
|