1
|
Angus-Leppan H, Arkell R, Watkins L, Heaney D, Cooper P, Shankar R. New valproate regulations, informed choice and seizure risk. J Neurol 2024:10.1007/s00415-024-12436-8. [PMID: 38896265 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12436-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Valproate is the most effective medication for generalised epilepsies, and several specific epilepsy syndromes. For some people, it will be the only medication to establish seizure remission, and withdrawing it carries risks of seizure recurrence and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). It is also of proven efficacy for bipolar disorder and migraine prevention. Guidelines based on observational and epidemiological studies stress that maternal valproate related teratogenicity and neurodevelopmental effects are significantly higher than for other antiseizure medications (ASMs). It should, therefore, only be used if other medications are ineffective and after balancing the teratogenicity risk. Regulatory restrictions have changed prescribing practices and reduced valproate use. The number of other medications that must be trialled in the different conditions for which valproate has effectiveness and the consequences of the lack of efficacy of those drugs leading to significant harm including death remains unexplored. Risk minimisation measures (RMMs) for valproate, chiefly Pregnancy Prevention practices (PPP), consider foetal risk and not risk to people living with epilepsy. In the United Kingdom (UK), limitations relating to valproate use in all people < 55 years commenced in January 2024. While the evidence in child-bearing women is not disputed, the data in males are based on animal models, case reports, and one commissioned, unpublished, non-peer reviewed report unavailable to the UK public, stakeholder charities or professionals. Evidence suggests that 30-40% of people switching from valproate have breakthrough seizures. Thus, an estimated 21,000-28000 people in the UK will imminently be exposed to the potential hazards of breakthrough seizures, including death. There is little government investment in monitoring the effects of these changes to valproate prescribing on patient health and quality of life. This review summarises the history of valproate regulation, evidence underpinning it and argues how the latest regulations in the UK do not align with the country's medical regulatory bodies ethical principles nor with the Montgomery principles of informed patient choice and autonomy. It dissects how such regulations infringe Common Law principles, nor give due regard for patient outcomes beyond reproduction. The paper looks to provide recommendations to redress these concerns while appreciating the core need for such governance to emerge in the first place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Angus-Leppan
- University of East London, Stratford, E15 4LZ, UK.
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
- Royal Free London, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| | - Rachel Arkell
- University of East London, Stratford, E15 4LZ, UK
- Kent Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NS, UK
- Centre for Reproductive Research and Communication, British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), London, UK
| | - Lance Watkins
- University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
- University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Dominic Heaney
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Paul Cooper
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Greater Manchester, Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Peninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
- University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watkins L, Henning O, Bassett P, Ashby S, Tromans S, Shankar R. Epilepsy professionals' views on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy counselling: A tale of two countries. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16375. [PMID: 38837829 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a leading cause of epilepsy mortality. All international guidance strongly advocates for clinicians working with people with epilepsy (PWE) to discuss SUDEP. Clinician views working with PWE in the UK and Norway on SUDEP counselling are compared. METHODS A cross-sectional online mixed methodology survey of 17 Likert and free-text response questions using validated themes was circulated via International League against Epilepsy/Epilepsy Specialist Nurses Association in the UK and International League against Epilepsy/Epilepsinet in Norway using a non-discriminatory exponential snowballing technique leading to non-probability sampling. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Thematic analysis was conducted on free-text responses. RESULTS Of 309 (UK 197, Norway 112) responses, UK clinicians were more likely to have experienced an SUDEP (p < 0.001), put greater importance on SUDEP communication (p < 0.001), discuss SUDEP with all PWE particularly new patients (p < 0.001), have access and refer to bereavement support (p < 0.001) and were less likely to never discuss SUDEP (p < 0.001). Significant differences existed between both countries' neurologists and nurses in SUDEP counselling with UK clinicians generally being more supportive. UK responders were more likely to be able to identify bereavement support (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis highlighted four shared themes and two specific to Norwegians. DISCUSSION Despite all international guidelines stating the need/importance to discuss SUDEP with all PWE there remain hesitation, avoidance and subjectivity in clinicians having SUDEP-related conversations, more so in Norway than the UK. Training and education are required to improve communication, engagement and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance Watkins
- University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK
- Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, Truro, UK
| | - Oliver Henning
- National Epilepsy Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Samuel Tromans
- SAPPHIRE Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Adult Learning Disability Service, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, Truro, UK
- Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laugharne R, Farid M, James C, Dutta A, Mould C, Molten N, Laugharne J, Shankar R. Neurotechnological solutions for post-traumatic stress disorder: A perspective review and concept proposal. Healthc Technol Lett 2023; 10:133-138. [PMID: 38111800 PMCID: PMC10725721 DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety condition caused by exposure to severe trauma. It is characterised by nightmares, flashbacks, hyper-vigilance and avoidance behaviour. These all lead to impaired functioning reducing quality of life. PTSD affects 2-5% of the population globally. Most sufferers cannot access effective treatment, leading to impaired psychological functioning reducing quality of life. Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) is a non-invasive brain stimulation treatment that has shown significant clinical effectiveness in PTSD. Another treatment modality, that is, trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy is also an effective intervention. However, both evidence-based treatments are significantly resource intensive as they need trained therapists to deliver them. A concept of a neuro-digital tool for development is proposed to put to clinical practice of delivering EMDR to improve availability, efficiency and effectiveness of treatment. The evidence in using new technologies to measure sleep, geolocation and conversational analysis of social media to report objective outcome measures is explored. If achieved, this can be fed back to users with data anonymously collated to evaluate and improve the tool. Coproduction would be at the heart of product development so that the tool is acceptable and accessible to people with the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Laugharne
- Psychoanalytica Community Interest CompanySt GermanUK
- Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable ResearchUniversity of Plymouth and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation TrustTruroUK
| | - Mohsen Farid
- Data Science Research CentreUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK
| | | | - Anirban Dutta
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK
| | | | | | | | - Rohit Shankar
- Psychoanalytica Community Interest CompanySt GermanUK
- Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable ResearchUniversity of Plymouth and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation TrustTruroUK
| |
Collapse
|