Efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: new therapeutic options

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease of unknown cause, with heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, as well as variability in its clinical course and prognosis. The current goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or a state of low activity, and thereby improve the patient's quality of life. Biological therapy in lupus, unlike other entities, although it has not been fully established, in recent years it has burst onto the scene with important therapeutic novelties. This review aims to update the therapeutic tools for the treatment of SLE focusing on the new molecules that have achieved the objectives of their clinical trials.

MicroRNA as a potential biomarker for systemic lupus erythematosus: pathogenesis and targeted therapy

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with hyperactive innate and adaptive immune systems that cause dermatological, cardiovascular, renal, and neuropsychiatric problems in patients. SLE's multifactorial nature and complex pathogenesis present significant challenges in its clinical classification. In addition, unpredictable treatment responses in patients emphasize the need for highly specific and sensitive SLE biomarkers that can assist in understanding the exact pathogenesis and, thereby, lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Recent studies on microRNA (miRNA), a non-coding region involved in the regulation of gene expression, indicate its importance in the development of the immune system and thus in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune disorders such as SLE. miRNAs are fascinating biomarker prospects for SLE categorization and disease monitoring owing to their small size and high stability. In this paper, we have discussed the involvement of a wide range of miRNAs in the regulation of SLE inflammation and how their modulation can be a potential therapeutic approach.

A Practical Overview of the Articular Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Although it is widely known that joint involvement is the most frequent and prevalent manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), not having a validated organ-specific index for this domain in order to guide its treatment has been a major limitation. In addition, its clinical importance had been underestimated since it was not a vital risk domain; it was never the center of treatment, under the premise that in most cases its progression was slow and did not lead to significant functional disability. However, this concept has been changing due to the greater description of erosions both in ultrasonography and in osteoarticular magnetic resonance, so their identification can establish a more appropriate treatment time and thus avoid joint deformities, which in some cases can become irreversible. Recently, anifrolumab and belimumab have been able to significantly reduce the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index scores, along with improvement in quality of life indices and a significant decrease in the required dose of glucocorticoids. Despite this, the ideal moment to consider biological therapy in this domain is not clear, since the clinical examination can sometimes be biased by the pain associated with fibromyalgia or the fatigue associated with SLE. For this reason, perhaps ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging, apart from differentiating the joint phenotype, can identify patients in time to define the onset of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and rationalize the use of glucocorticoids. The objective of this review is to characterize in detail the joint manifestations of SLE to offer the clinician a practical view of its diagnosis and treatment.

Current Treatment Approach, Emerging Therapies and New Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal involvement may be observed and affects the outcome. Hydroxychloroquine should be administered to every lupus patient irrespective of organ involvement. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy includes corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment, flares occur and broad immunosuppression is accompanied by multiple side effects. Flare occurrence, target organ involvement, side effects of broad immunosuppression and increased knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis as well as the availability of biologic agents has led to the application of biologic agents in SLE management. Biologic agents targeting various pathogenetic paths have been applied. B cell targeting agents have been used successfully. Belimumab, a B cell targeting agent, has been approved for the treatment of SLE. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting agent is also used in SLE. Anifrolumab, an interferon I receptor-targeting agent has beneficial effects on SLE. In conclusion, biologic treatment is applied in SLE and should be further evaluated with the aim of a good treatment response and a significant improvement in quality of life.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: An approach to pharmacologic interventions

ABSTRACT

Drug therapy for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aims to decrease symptom severity. Pharmacologic interventions are divided into four categories: antimalarials, glucocorticoids (GCs), immunosuppressants (ISs), and biological agents. Hydroxychloroquine, the most commonly used antimalarial treatment for this disease, is a mainstay in treating all patients with SLE. The multitude of adverse reactions of GCs has led clinicians to minimize their dosages or discontinue them whenever possible. To speed up the discontinuation or minimization of GCs, ISs are used for their steroid-sparing properties. Furthermore, certain ISs such as cyclophosphamide are recommended as maintenance agents to prevent flares and reduce the reoccurrence and severity of the disease state. Biological agents are recommended when other treatment options have failed due to intolerance or inefficacy. This article presents pharmacologic approaches for managing SLE in patients based on clinical practice guidelines and data from randomized controlled trials.

Successful treatment of idiopathic retinal vasculitis with rituximab in two patients

Purpose

To describe results of treatment of idiopathic retinal vasculitis with intravenous rituximab.

Observations

We present two patients with idiopathic retinal vasculitis who required steroid-sparing therapy and achieved steroid-free remission with intravenous rituximab. Rituximab was used as a first-line steroid-sparing agent after steroids in one patient and as a second-line steroid-sparing agent in the other patient. Both patients achieved steroid-free remission of disease with follow up of at least one year after rituximab initiation.

Conclusions and importance

Rituximab achieved steroid-free remission in two patients with idiopathic retinal vasculitis. It should be considered as a treatment option in these patients.

Off-label use of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with extrarenal disease activity: a retrospective study and literature review

Introduction

Off-label rituximab is commonly used for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with extrarenal disease activity.

Methods

The outcomes and tolerability of rituximab in adult patients with non-renal SLE treated at our hospital from 2013 to 2020 were described. Patients were followed-up until December 2021. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Response was classified into complete, partial or no response according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2 K)-based definitions.

Results

A total of 44 cycles were administered to 33 patients. Median age was 45 years and 97% were female. Median follow-up was 5.9 years (IQR 3.7-7.2). The most frequent symptoms that motivated rituximab use were thrombocytopenia (30.3%), arthritis (30.3%), neurological manifestations (24.2%) and cutaneous lupus (15.2%). After most treatment cycles a partial remission was achieved. The median SLEDAI-2 K score declined from 9 (IQR 5-13) to 1.5 (IQR 0-4) (p < 0.00001). The median number of flares significantly declined after receiving rituximab. Platelet counts significantly improved in patients with thrombocytopenia and patients with skin disorders or neurological manifestations also had a partial or complete response. Only 50% of patients with a predominant joint involvement had either a complete or a partial response. The median time to relapse after the first cycle was 1.6 years (95% CI, 0.6-3.1). Anti-dsDNA levels decreased significantly after rituximab from a median of 64.3 (IQR 12-373.9) to 32.7 (IQR 10-173), p = 0.00338. The most frequent adverse events were infusion-related reactions (18.2%) and infections (57.6%). All patients needed further treatment to maintain remission or to treat new flares.

Conclusion

A partial or complete response was documented after most rituximab cycles in patients with non-renal SLE. Patients with thrombocytopenia, neurolupus, and cutaneous lupus had better response than those with a predominant joint involvement.

Targeted Therapy for SLE-What Works, What Doesn't, What's Next

For many years, the failure of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has prevented patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from benefiting from biological drugs that have proved to be effective in other rheumatological diseases. Only two biologics are approved for SLE, however they can only be administered to a restricted proportion of patients. Recently, several phase II RCTs have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in extra-renal SLE and lupus nephritis. Six drug trials have reported encouraging results, with an improvement in multiple clinical and serological outcome measures. The possibility of combining B-cell depletion and anti-BLyS treatment has also been successfully explored.

Preventing organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: the impact of early biological treatment

INTRODUCTION

One of the most important aims in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is to avoid or delay the accumulation of organ damage. The first five years after diagnosis are crucial for prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript reviews available data on organ damage accrual in SLE and early therapeutic intervention as a possible strategy to prevent its long-term accrual.

EXPERT OPINION

Organ damage can be minimized by controlling disease activity and risk of flares, reducing the dose of glucocorticoids, and ensuring a proper therapeutic intervention with an early introduction of the right therapies. The current standard treatment cannot provide clinical remission in all patients with SLE. Therefore, there is a clinical need for introducing new therapeutic strategies able to achieve the main therapeutic objectives. The addition of biologic and other therapeutic agents to the standard of care is effective for controlling disease activity and for preventing severe flares, enabling a reduced use of glucocorticoids, and presumably reducing organ damage progression. Considering its efficacy and safety, early inclusion of biologic agents in the first lines of the treatment algorithm, at least in certain patients, could be considered as an innovative treatment approach to decrease disease burden in SLE patients.

Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part I. Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren's Syndrome

The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The first article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.

Discovery of a novel Igβ and FcγRIIB cross-linking antibody, ASP2713, and its potential application in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

B cell-targeted therapies have evolved as established therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, existing approaches still do not thoroughly satisfy clinical requirements due to limited efficacy against memory B cells, autoantibody-producing plasmablasts and disease heterogeneity. To provide a new treatment option for SLE, we created a novel anti-Igβ antibody with enhanced affinity for Fc gamma receptor (FcγR) IIB called ASP2713. ASP2713 cross-reacted with both human and cynomolgus monkey Igβ and showed increased binding affinity for human and monkey FcγRIIB compared to native human IgG1. This binding property allows dominant B cell binding and induction of intrinsic negative feedback signals. In human B cells, ASP2713 significantly and concentration-dependently induced FcγRIIB ITIM phosphorylation, while suppressing proliferation under B cell receptor stimulation. This pharmacological effect was also confirmed in in vitro B cell proliferation and antibody production assays using peripheral B cells isolated from patients with SLE. In a cynomolgus monkey tetanus toxoid-induced antibody production model, ASP2713 almost completely inhibited the increase in antigen-specific antibodies with superior efficacy to rituximab. Additionally, ASP2713 significantly suppressed recall antibody production in response to secondary tetanus toxoid immunization, indicating the memory B cell- and plasmablast-targeting potential of ASP2713. Our results suggest that ASP2713 may have therapeutic potential as a treatment for SLE, where B cells play a pathogenic role.

A modified regimen of low-dose rituximab therapy for patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

Background:

Severe and refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) affects the life expectancy of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and poses a challenge in their clinical management. This intervention study employed a small sample size to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified low-dose rituximab (RTX) regimen in patients with SLE-associated refractory ITP.

Methods:

Eight patients with severe SLE-associated refractory ITP were enrolled in this intervention study. They received an infusion of intravenous RTX (200 mg) on days 1 and 15. The dose of corticosteroids (prescribed previously) was gradually tapered, and immunosuppressants were withdrawn. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; platelet counts, other laboratory indicators, and side effects were recorded. We used intention-to-treat analysis to calculate the response rate.

Results:

Seven participants (87.5%) completed the study. At 1 month, two patients (25.0%) achieved partial response (PR); the PR rate increased to 87.5% at 3 months. At 6 months, three patients (37.5%) achieved complete response (CR). However, the CR rate dropped to 25.0% at 12 months. The overall responses (ORs) were 25.0% (2/8), 87.5% (7/8), 75.0%(6/8), and 75.0%(6/8) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Two patients developed a mild infusion reaction and one discontinued the study due to herpes zoster virus infection and an allergic reaction 2 weeks after the first dose of RTX.

Conclusion:

Modified low-dose RTX therapy (two infusions of 200 mg every 2 weeks) could be a promising new option for patients with SLE-associated refractory ITP with a satisfactory response rate.

The landscape of systemic lupus erythematosus in Brazil: An expert panel review and recommendations

PURPOSE

The objective of this review is to address the barriers limiting access to diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) in Brazil, specifically for patients in the public healthcare system, arguably those with the least access to innovation.

DESIGN

A selected panel of Brazilian experts in SLE/LN were provided with a series of relevant questions to address in a multi-day conference. During the conference, responses were discussed and edited by the entire group through numerous drafts and rounds of discussion until a consensus was achieved.

RESULTS

The authors propose specific and realistic recommendations for implementing access to innovative diagnostic tools and treatment alternatives for SLE/LN in Brazil. Moreover, in creating these recommendations, the authors strived to address barriers and impediments for technology adoption. The multidisciplinary care required for SLE/LN necessitates the collective participation of all involved stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

A great need exists to expand the adoption of innovative diagnostic tools and treatments for SLE/LN not only in Brazil but also in most countries, as access issues remain an urgent demand. The recommendations presented in this article can serve as a strategy for new technology adoption in other countries in a similar situation.

Relevant domains and outcome measurement instruments in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

Although neuropsychiatric involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (NPSLE) is one of the most complex and troubling manifestations of the disease, validated outcome instruments to be used as sensitive endpoints in controlled clinical trials are lacking. We set out a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify outcome measurement instruments and domains used to assess NPSLE.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Articles available in English (1967-2020), listed in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and EULAR outcome measures library were screened. All domains and outcome measurement instruments were characterized according to the OMERACT Filter 2.1, considering core areas (manifestations/abnormalities, life impact, death/lifespan, societal/resource use) and contextual factors.

RESULTS

Of 3,392 abstracts evaluated, 83 studies were included in the SLR (15,974 patients, females 89.9%). Eligible studies included domains and instruments pertinent to all core areas defined by OMERACT, except for "societal/resource use". The most common core areas were "manifestations/abnormalities", covering 10 domains pertinent to laboratory and instrumental markers, indexes and neuropsychiatric dimension (cognitive, neurologic and psychiatric field), and "life impact", covering 7 domains related to physical function (from both the perspective of the patient and the physician), pain and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed great heterogeneity in the instruments derived from populations with NPSLE and none of these had high-quality evidence. This supports the need to develop and further validate a core domain set and outcome measurement instruments to promote clinical research in this field, enhancing comparability across studies.

Treating systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century: new drugs and new perspectives on old drugs

Besides treating acute flares, the management of SLE should aim at preventing organ damage accrual and drug-associated harms, improving health-related quality of life and prolonging survival. At present, therapy is based on combinations of antimalarials (mainly HCQ), considered the backbone of SLE treatment, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, these regimens are not universally effective and a substantial degree of damage can be caused by exposure to glucocorticoids. In this review we provide a critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of available treatments as well as a brief discussion of potentially novel compounds in patients with SLE. We emphasize the use of methylprednisolone pulses for moderate–severe flares, followed by low–moderate doses of oral prednisone with quick tapering to maintenance doses of ≤5 mg/day, as well as the prompt institution of immunosuppressive drugs in the setting of severe disease but also as steroid-sparing agents. Indications for the use of biologic agents, namely belimumab and rituximab, in refractory or organ-threatening disease are also presented. We conclude by proposing evidence- and experience-based treatment strategies tailored to the clinical scenario and prevailing organ involvement that can aid clinicians in managing this complex disease.

Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, whose hallmark is the production of autoantibodies. B cells are promising targets for novel SLE therapies. In 2011, belimumab (Benlysta®), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting B-cell activation and proliferation, was the first medication in 50 years to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adult SLE. This review discusses the current experience with B-cell-targeted therapies, including those targeting B-cell-surface antigens (rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, obexelimab, epratuzumab, daratumumab), B-cell survival factors (belimumab, tabalumab, atacicept, blisibimod), or B-cell intracellular functions (ibrutinib, fenebrutinib, proteasome inhibitors), for the management of SLE. It focuses on ongoing clinical trials and real-world post-marketing use, where available, including their safety profiles, and concludes with our recommendations for B-cell-centric approaches to the management of SLE.

Management of inflammatory neurologic and psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The neurological and psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) are a heterogeneous group of conditions with variable clinical presentation and significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to comprehensively assess and present the evidence for treatments used in the management of inflammatory NPSLE.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CINHAL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 1990 to end of March 2019 using key words that related to NPSLE and treatment. Included studies comprised clinical trials, observational studies or case series with ≥5 patients and sufficient data related to treatment and outcome in NPSLE patients.

RESULTS

There were 7222 studies identified in the search, of which 90 were included in the review. There was a notable paucity of clinical trials, with only two randomised controlled trials and one pilot study. Treatment categories included corticosteroids (14 studies), cyclophosphamide (18 studies), synthetic DMARDs (7 studies), biologic therapies (14 studies), therapeutic plasma exchange (6 studies), intravenous immunoglobulin (2 studies), autologous stem cell transplant (3 studies), other therapies (8 studies), combination therapies (6 studies), studies with grouped outcome data (5 studies) and observational studies with therapy-specific associations (7 studies). Corticosteroids are accepted as first line treatment in NPSLE and there is low-moderate evidence supporting their benefit. Moderate evidence, based on consistent data in numerous studies and some trial data, supports the use of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of NPSLE. Limited data support some synthetic DMARDs such as mycophenolate, azathioprine and intrathecal methotrexate. In refractory disease, low-moderate evidence supports rituximab therapy and limited evidence supports benefit following autologous stem cell transplant. Regarding adjuvant treatments, limited evidence favours addition of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and hydroxychloroquine. There exists very limited data for other therapies.

CONCLUSION

There are multiple therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory NPSLE including systemic, biologic and interventional therapies; however, currently there is a paucity of high-quality trial data to guide firm recommendations. In order to better understand the optimal treatment of NPSLE and its different subtypes, further well-designed clinical trials are needed.

Hematological Manifestations among Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic diseases have many hematological manifestations. Blood dyscrasias and other hematological abnormalities are sometimes the first sign of rheumatic disease. In addition, novel antirheumatic biological agents may cause cytopenias.

SUMMARY

The aim of this review was to discuss cytopenias caused by systemic lupus erythematosus and antirheumatic drugs, Felty's syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia, thrombosis, and thrombotic microangiopathies related to rheumatological conditions such as catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and scleroderma renal crisis. Key Message: The differential diagnosis of various hematological disorders should include rheumatic autoimmune diseases among other causes of blood cell and hemostasis abnormalities. It is crucial that hematologists be aware of these presentations so that they are diagnosed and treated in a timely manner.

[Secondary ITP in adults]

Secondary forms of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) represent approximately 20% of all ITP cases in adulthood and this rate increases with age. Since some causes may influence both the prognosis and outcome but also the management of ITP, a minimal workup must be performed at ITP diagnosis to look for an associated or underlying cause. Among adults, B-cell lymphomas and mainly chronic lymphocytic leukemia, systemic auto-immune diseases such as systemic lupus or primary immunodeficiencies mainly represented by common variable immunodeficiency are the most frequent causes of secondary ITP. Whereas first-line therapy used for secondary ITP is usually similar to the one commonly used in primary ITP and relies mostly on corticosteroids±intravenous immunoglobulin according to the severity of bleeding, second and third-line treatments must take into account the type and degree of activity of the underlying disease.

Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: current approaches and future strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease. No specific Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies for CLE-alone are available, and resistance to conventional treatments is common. This review will summarize current treatment approaches and pending treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research into the pathogenesis of CLE is accelerating. A skewed type I interferon production and response contribute to CLE lesions. The pathophysiology of lesions may be similar among the lesional subtypes, and patients with a more TLR9-driven disease mechanism may have more benefit from hydroxychloroquine. Case reports continue to support the use of dapsone for CLE, especially bullous lupus erythematosus. Rituximab and Belimumab have efficacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and severe active CLE. The significant role for type I interferons in CLE and encouraging clinical data suggest anifrolumab as a very promising agent for CLE. Dapirolizumab, BIIB059, Ustekinumab and Janus kinase inhibitors also have supportive early data as promising new strategies for CLE treatment.

SUMMARY

Continued research to understand the mechanisms driving CLE will facilitate the development and approval of new targets. The pipeline for new treatments is rich.

Treatment of primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medical therapies for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) complicating SLE are increasingly being investigated as alternatives to splenectomy and IVIG. The purpose of this review is to highlight the therapies that are utilized in the treatment of primary ITP and ITP secondary to lupus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Corticosteroids are still the standard initial treatment of ITP, with the addition of IVIG when a rapid response is needed. There are few studies dedicated to assessing the efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic (DMARD), biologic, and nonimmunosuppressive agents as treatment for lupus thrombocytopenia/lupus ITP. Rituximab and thrombopoeitin mimetics have been the most extensively studied therapies for primary ITP in recent years. Results of trials show adequate initial responses; however, the duration of therapy and sustainability of responses are variable. Splenectomy is less often utilized.

SUMMARY

Although corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy have proven to be effective measures to treat immune thrombocytopenia, newer studies have demonstrated positive outcomes of immunosuppressives and thrombopoeitin mimetics. In most cases, the reported duration of therapy was not prolonged. More studies are needed to fully assess the effect of medical therapy in lupus ITP and to determine how long to continue maintenance therapy.

Efficacy of rituximab in difficult-to-manage autoimmune hepatitis: Results from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group

Treatment options remain limited for patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), while there are still concerns over the consequences of long-term corticosteroid use. A few studies have suggested a role for B cell-driven autoimmune liver injury in AIH. This multicentre, international retrospective cohort study from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab in difficult-to-manage AIH.

Methods

Clinical data from 22 patients who received rituximab between 2007 and 2017 were collected from centres in the United Kingdom, Germany and Canada. Clinical response was assessed using changes in biochemical and immunological parameters up to 24 months post-rituximab infusion. In addition, we compared the doses of prednisolone used 3 months before and 12 months after treatment, and assessed freedom from AIH flares over the post-treatment period.

Results

Twenty-two patients with type-1 AIH were included, with a median age of 40 years at diagnosis (range 19–79); 15/22 (68%) were female and 18/22 (82%) were Caucasian. The median period from diagnosis to the end of follow-up in these patients was 11 years (range 3–28). Values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and albumin improved significantly following rituximab therapy, and were sustained for up to 2 years (all p ≪0.001). Prednisolone doses were significantly reduced by 12 months post-treatment (p = 0.003), with 13/21 (62%) patients having a dose reduction. Over a median post-treatment follow-up period of 6 years (range 1–10), 5 patients developed AIH flares at a median of 22 months post-treatment, giving an estimated 71% freedom from AIH flare at 2 years. Four of these patients received a second course of treatment, of whom 2 had subsequent further flares. No serious adverse events attributable to rituximab were recorded.

Conclusion

In patients with difficult-to-manage AIH, rituximab appears to be clinically effective and well tolerated. Rituximab was associated with sustained improvements in serum liver tests, an absence of clinical disease flares, and a reduction in prednisolone dose. Controlled trials are warranted to further evaluate B cell-targeting therapies in patients with AIH.

Lay summary

Autoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune condition of the liver, usually treated with medications that suppress the immune system, such as steroids. However, some patients do not respond to this treatment. We analysed the safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients who were not responding to first- or second-line therapies. Rituximab was safe and improved liver blood tests in 70% of patients over a 2-year follow-up period, while enabling steroid doses to be reduced in two-thirds of patients, which is a very positive clinical outcome.

•

Study of rituximab therapy in 22 patients with autoimmune hepatitis over a follow-up period of 24 months.

•

No serious adverse events were noted during follow-up in patients treated with rituximab.

•

Rituximab therapy improved liver enzymes significantly during the 2 years of follow-up.

•

Prednisolone dose reductions were seen in 62% of patients at 12-month follow-up.

•

A total of 71% of patients were free of AIH flares during the 24 months of follow-up.

Assessment of Response to B-Cell Depletion Using Rituximab in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Importance

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) can be severe and treatment resistant. B-cell depletion therapy (BCDT) with rituximab is well recognized in organ involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but its efficacy in cutaneous manifestations is less well established.

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of BCDT in CLE and its clinical subtypes in the setting of associated SLE.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, retrospective, cohort study was performed at the adult tertiary referral Rheumatology Department of University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom, from January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2016, with 12-month follow-up completed on March 31, 2017. Adult patients with carefully classified CLE and mucocutaneous British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) grade A or B who were treated with rituximab BCDT were selected from a prospective database of 709 patients with SLE. Data were analyzed from April through December 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Clinical response was examined at 6 and 12 months after treatment for CLE and its subtypes acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), and nonspecific LE (NSLE). A complete response was defined as achieving BILAG grade D; partial response, BILAG grade C; stable disease, no change; and disease flare, change from BILAG grade C or D to grade A or B.

Results

A total of 50 patients with SLE were eligible for inclusion; mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 26.9 (12.1) years, and 49 (98%) were women. Twenty-one patients had ACLE; 6, SCLE; 10, CCLE; and 11, NSLE (including 2 with concurrent ACLE and CCLE). Overall, at 6 months, 38 patients (76%) improved their mucocutaneous BILAG grade A or B status, including 20 (40%) with a complete response. At 12 months, 28 of 46 patients (61%) maintained this response, including 24 (52%) with a complete response. Two of 6 patients (33%) with SCLE showed a complete response at 6 and 12 months. Five of 12 patients (42%) with CCLE showed a complete response at 6 months, and 5 of 11 (45%), at 12 months. Fifteen patients (30%) required further rituximab therapy within 12 months for cutaneous involvement.

Conclusions and Relevance

B-cell depletion therapy using rituximab appears effective in patients with SLE and severe active CLE; however, outcomes are variable in those with SCLE and CCLE subtypes.

Biological therapies and their clinical impact in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

The development of biological therapies has had an impact on the management of several medical conditions. Their use in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), however, remains very limited. This review has summarized the evidence on the clinical effect of biologicals in SLE. Biological drugs with a number of targets have been studied in several phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Positive results have been obtained in phase III RCTs with belimumab and this led to its license for active SLE. The clinical experience with belimumab has confirmed the efficacy and safety of belimumab in SLE. Promising results have been noted in phase II trials for blisibimod, sifalimumab, anifrolumab, and ustekinumab. Despite the fact that the RCTs with rituximab did not achieve their primary endpoint, clinical experience with rituximab is extensive and shows favorable clinical response in refractory renal and non-renal SLE. It is hoped that further ongoing phase III RCTs on a number of biological agents in SLE will highlight the potential role of other biologicals in the management of this challenging and heterogeneous condition.

[Biologics in rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins were introduced into clinical rheumatology 20 years ago. Nowadays they are an established component of modern internal medical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This article gives an overview of the breadth of biologics currently in clinical use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation of published approval studies and guideline recommendations, discussion of the immunological principles and targets in the treatment with biologics.

RESULTS

Monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins for influencing cytokine signals, T‑cell costimulation and B‑cell function are the most important innovations in the treatment of rheumatological diseases. Nowadays they are indispensible for the treatment of moderate and severe disease courses of rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthropathies and vasculitides.

CONCLUSION

Although a cure or permanent freedom from symptoms in rheumatological autoimmune diseases is still not possible, much more favorable disease courses with less long-term limitations can be achieved by the early administration of biologics.

Rituximab in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: indications and practical use

Objectives: To review the therapeutic option of Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Methods: A non-systematic review was conducted. Results: The specific role and indication of rituximab in SARDs has been the subject of multiple trials in recent years. Evidence supports the use of rituximab in moderate-to-severe refractory systemic lupus erythematosus, diffuse skin involvement in systemic sclerosis and systemic involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome. Several guidelines have adopted these indications. In addition, there is a consensus about the use of rituximab in refractory myositis. The role of rituximab in interstitial lung disease associated with these SARDs needs to be further explored. Conclusion: Rituximab is a treatment option in several SARDs. Upcoming trials, use in daily practice and the safety profile are elaborated on.

Management of non-renal non-neurologic persistent lupus activity in real world patients from Argentina

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus patients is challenging because of disease heterogeneity. Although treatment of renal nephritis is more standardized, treating non-renal lupus activity remains controversial. Our objective was to identify non-renal, non-neurologic persistent active systemic lupus erythematosus patients in our cohort and described therapeutic behaviors in them. All systemic lupus erythematosus patients (American College of Rheumatology and/or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics criteria) seen at a university hospital between 2000 and 2017 were included and electronic medical records manually reviewed. Persistent lupus activity was defined as a patient with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score ≥ 6 (without renal and central nervous system manifestations) despite being on a stable treatment regimen for ≥ 30 days. Stable treatment could include prednisone alone (7.5-40 mg/d) or combined with antimalarial drugs and immunosuppressant therapies. A total of 257 lupus patients were included, 230 females (89.5%, 95% confidence interval 85.1-92.7), mean age at diagnosis 29.9 years (SD 16.4). After a median cohort follow-up of 5.7 years (interquartile range 2.4-10.2), 14 patients (5.4%, 95% confidence interval 3.2-9.0) showed persistent non-renal non neurologic lupus activity, with a median disease duration of 11.3 years (interquartile range 3.6-19.4). At that time, 12/14 (85.7 %, 95% confidence interval 52.6-97.0%) had low complement and 11/14 (78.6 %, 95% confidence interval 46.5-93.9%) had positive antiDNA antibodies. The main reasons for being refractory were mucocutaneous disease (50%, 95% confidence interval 23.5-76.5) and arthritis (42.9%, 95% confidence interval 18.5-71.2). Therapeutic choices after being refractory were: only increasing corticosteroid dose in one patient, starting rituximab in four, belimumab in eight, and in one mycophenolate and rituximab; with good response in all of them. In conclusion, 5.4% of systemic lupus erythematosus patients in our cohort were considered to have non-renal non neurologic persistent lupus activity, with mucocutaneous and arthritis the main manifestations. In total, 92.8% of these patients started a biologic treatment at this point (rituximab or belimumab).

2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007–12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.

Changing paradigms in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

SLE poses formidable therapeutic challenges due to its heterogeneity and treatment decisions often cannot be guided by data of high quality. In this review, we attempt to provide insights regarding the treatment of SLE in everyday clinical practice, based on contemporary evidence and our own personal experience. We focus on common therapeutic issues and dilemmas arising in routine care, including monitoring for retinal toxicity associated with hydroxychloroquine, handling of glucocorticoid regimens in order to minimise their adverse events, choice of immunosuppressive medications based on prevailing disease manifestations and optimal use of available biological agents (belimumab and rituximab). We also provide our view on the position of calcineurin inhibitors in the management of lupus nephritis and conclude with remarks on the future perspectives for this challenging disease.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: Diagnosis and clinical management

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a worldwide chronic autoimmune disease which may affect every organ and tissue. Genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and the hormonal milieu, interplay in disease development and activity. Clinical manifestations and the pattern of organ involvement are widely heterogenous, reflecting the complex mosaic of disrupted molecular pathways converging into the SLE clinical phenotype. The SLE complex pathogenesis involves multiple cellular components of the innate and immune systems, presence of autoantibodies and immunocomplexes, engagement of the complement system, dysregulation of several cytokines including type I interferons, and disruption of the clearance of nucleic acids after cell death. Use of immunomodulators and immunosuppression has altered the natural course of SLE. In addition, morbidity and mortality in SLE not only derive from direct immune mediated tissue damage but also from SLE and treatment associated complications such as accelerated coronary artery disease and increased infection risk. Here, we review the diagnostic approach as well as the etiopathogenetic rationale and clinical evidence for the management of SLE. This includes 1) lifestyle changes such as avoidance of ultraviolet light; 2) prevention of comorbidities including coronary artery disease, osteoporosis, infections, and drug toxicities; 3) use of immunomodulators (i.e. hydroxychloroquine and vitamin D); and 4) immunosuppressants and targeted therapy. We also review new upcoming agents and regimens currently under study.

Subcutaneous formulation of belimumab in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical review with focus on safety and satisfaction

Belimumab is a novel add-on therapy that has been approved for patients with active and antibody-mediated systemic lupus erythematosus. It is a monoclonal antibody that decreases the activation of B-cells and consequently decreases antibodies' production. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved subcutaneous belimumab for patients who have received training on using it. Subcutaneous belimumab can be administered using either a prefilled syringe or an auto-injector device. Weekly subcutaneous belimumab seems to be as effective as monthly intravenous belimumab with a similar safety margin. In this article, we reviewed the literature on subcutaneous belimumab focusing on safety and patients' experiences and satisfaction. Overall, subcutaneous belimumab appears to be preferred over intravenous belimumab for a number of reasons. However, more studies are still required to prove these findings.

The effectiveness and safety of biological therapeutics in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE): a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and summarize the available literature regarding the effectiveness and safety of biologics in the treatment of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

PubMed was systematically searched for relevant literature (2012-2017 inclusive) using the following criteria: (1) patients diagnosed with juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (≤18 years at diagnosis); (2) treatment with any biological agent; and (3) outcome measures assessing effectiveness and safety. Systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case control studies, cross sectional surveys and case-series with ≥3 patients were included. Independent extraction of articles by two authors using predefined criteria was performed. The quality of each study was assessed using CASP tools and Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence.

RESULTS

Nine articles met inclusion criteria: six cohort studies, two case series and one pilot study, totalling 230 patients. All but one article reported the effects of rituximab, the other those of belimumab. Overall, patients had active disease refractory to standard of care regimens using corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Available evidence for rituximab demonstrated improvements in disease activity, complement levels and anti-dsDNA titres accompanying a steroid-sparing effect.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab can be considered an effective treatment in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients with severe disease manifestations and/or refractory disease. Based on current evidence, use of belimumab in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients cannot be recommended. The long-term safety of these biological agents remains uncertain. Further prospective studies, ideally robust randomized controlled trials, are urgently needed to obtain more accurate data on the effectiveness and long-term safety of rituximab, belimumab and other biologics in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Recent advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease presenting highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations and multi-systemic involvement. Patients are susceptible to relapse- and remission, thus making management challenging. Moreover, a considerable number of side effects may occur with conventional therapies; therefore, there is clearly a need for new therapeutic strategies. Since the pathogenesis of SLE is highly complex, it is far from being fully understood. However, greater understanding of the pathways and of the cellular and molecular mediators involved in SLE is being achieved. Emerging evidence has allowed the development of new biological therapeutic options targeting crucial molecular mediators involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. This literature review analyzes the availability of biological and target-directed treatments, phase II and III trials, and new therapies that are being developed for the treatment of SLE.

Short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register

Objectives

To describe the baseline characteristics of SLE patients requiring biologic therapy in the UK and to explore short term efficacy and infection rates associated with rituximab (RTX) use.

Methods

Patients commencing biologic therapy for refractory SLE and who consented to join BILAG-BR were analysed. Baseline characteristics, disease activity (BILAG 2004/SLEDAI-2K) and rates of infection over follow-up were analysed. Response was defined as loss of all A and B BILAG scores to ⩽ 1 B score with no new A/B scores in other organ systems at 6 months.

Results

Two hundred and seventy SLE patients commenced biologic therapy from September 2010 to September 2015, most commonly RTX (n = 261). Two hundred and fifty (93%) patients were taking glucocorticoids at baseline at a median [interquartile range (IQR)] oral dose of 10 mg (5–20 mg) daily. Response rates at 6 months were available for 68% of patients. The median (IQR) BILAG score was 15 (10–23) at baseline and 3 (2–12) at 6 months (P < 0.0001). The median (IQR) SLEDAI-2K reduced from 8 (5–12) to 4 (0–7) (P < 0.001). Response was achieved in 49% of patients. There was also a reduction in glucocorticoid use to a median (IQR) dose of 7.5 mg (5–12 mg) at 6 months (P < 0.001). Serious infections occurred in 26 (10%) patients, being more frequent in the first 3 months post-RTX therapy. A higher proportion of early infections were non-respiratory (odds ratio = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.99, 3.9; P = 0.049).

Conclusion

RTX is safe and is associated with improvement in disease activity in refractory SLE patients with concomitant reductions in glucocorticoid use. Early vigilance for infection post-infusion is important to further improve treatment risks and benefits.

Preference for Subcutaneous Injection or Intravenous Infusion of Biological Therapy Among Italian Patients With SLE

This article focuses on the patients’ acceptance of a subcutaneous injection device for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, which in the upcoming years could be introduced beside the intravenous infusion of biological therapy. An online questionnaire was completed by 548 patients from different Italian regions. The preference for subcutaneous injection was 41.2%, for intravenous infusion was 36.9%, and 21.9% were uncertain. Patients with previous experience of biological therapies were less uncertain (P = .001). The reported motivations for the preference were analyzed through a lexicometric approach with the software T-LAB. Results revealed that respondents who preferred subcutaneous injections reported motivations that were more related to convenience, avoiding the discomfort of reaching the hospital. Patients who preferred intravenous infusion emphasized the importance of safety feelings related to the presence of qualified assistance during the therapy administration. In conclusion, patients appreciated the convenience that characterizes subcutaneous injections but also emphasized the importance of feeling safe during the administration. The study suggests that the choice of prescribing subcutaneous injections or intravenous infusions should be shared with patients, discussing possible resistances and avoiding preconceptions about patients’ preferences.

Lupus myocarditis receiving the rituximab therapy-a monocentric retrospective study

Despite high-dose corticosteroids alone or with immunosuppressive agents as the standard therapy in lupus myocarditis (LM), an immune complex-mediated critical setting, such management is still associated with resistant disease and even mortality. A retrospective study was performed for the refractory LM patients treated with rituximab (RTX), a very limited experience in English literatures. A retrospective review of the myocarditis manifestation was carried out in hospitalized Han Chinese patients with SLE from February 2007 to January 2017. This study analyzed lupus patients who met the diagnosis of LM for their demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography as well as the medication profiles. Among 802 SLE patients, 13 female (1.6%) aged 19 to 52 years (31.9 ± 10.7), fulfilled the LM diagnostic criteria. Under the indications of LM or multi-organic flares with myocarditis refractory to the conventional therapy, three cases received the RTX therapy. All had improved myocardial function as demonstrated by clinical and imaging presentations as well as a decrease in lupus activity. In this 10-year retrospective monocentric cohort, improved myocardial function is demonstrated in refractory LM patients receiving the RTX therapy.

Long-term efficacy and safety of antitumour necrosis factor alpha treatment in rhupus: an open-label study of 15 patients

Background

The efficacy of antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) treatment is well recognised in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but remains controversial in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Therefore, the role of anti-TNF-α treatment in 'Rhupus', a disease sharing features of RA and SLE, is still debated.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of anti-TNF-α in patients with rhupus.

Methods

Fifteen patients with rhupus with Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) >3.2 despite conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were included in an open-label study. Patients were monitored at months (M) 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and DAS 28. Statistical analyses were performed using Bayesian methods and Prob >97.5% was considered significant.

Results

Twelve patients were treated with etanercept for a median duration of 62.5 (range: 6-112) months and three patients by adalimumab during 36.0 (range: 4-52) months. At baseline, median DAS 28 and SLEDAI were 5.94 (4.83-8.09) and 6 (4-8), respectively. DAS 28 and SLEDAI decreased significantly after 3 months, respectively, to 3.70 (1.80-6.42) and 4 (0-6) (Prob >99.9%, for both). These changes persisted at M6, M12, M24 and M60 (Prob >99.9%, for all). Median prednisone dose decreased significantly from 15 (5-35) mg/day to 5 (0-20) mg/day after 6 months and over the follow-up (Prob >99.9%, for all). Tolerance was acceptable, with a severe infection rate of 3.0 per 100 patient-years.

Conclusion

This pilot study suggests that anti-TNF-α is effective in patients with rhupus with refractive arthritis and has an acceptable safety profile.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in the Management of Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab for treating pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with pSLE. Data from studies performed before July 2016 were collected from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the International Rheumatic Disease Abstracts, with no language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational studies with a minimal sample size of 5 patients, regarding treatment with rituximab in patients with refractory pSLE (aged <18 years at the time of diagnosis). Independent extraction of articles was performed by 2 investigators using predefined data fields.

RESULTS

Twelve case series met the criteria for data extraction for the systematic review with a good quality assessment according to an 18-criteria checklist using a modified Delphi method. Among them, 3 studies were multicenter and 3 were prospective. The total number of patients was 272. Studies collected patients with active disease refractory to steroids and immunosuppressant drugs. Refractory lupus nephritis was the most common indication (33%). Acceptable evidence suggested improvements in renal, neuropsychiatric and haematological manifestations, disease activity, complement and anti-double stranded Desoxy-Nucleo-Adenosine, with a steroid-sparing effect. However, there was poor evidence suggesting efficacy on arthralgia, photosensitivity, and mucocutaneous manifestations of SLE in children. An overall acceptable safety profile with few major adverse events was shown.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab exhibited a satisfactory profile regarding efficacy and safety indicating that this agent is a promising therapy for pSLE and should be further investigated.

Modelling clinical systemic lupus erythematosus: similarities, differences and success stories

Mouse models of SLE have been indispensable tools to study disease pathogenesis, to identify genetic susceptibility loci and targets for drug development, and for preclinical testing of novel therapeutics. Recent insights into immunological mechanisms of disease progression have boosted a revival in SLE drug development. Despite promising results in mouse studies, many novel drugs have failed to meet clinical end points. This is probably because of the complexity of the disease, which is driven by polygenic predisposition and diverse environmental factors, resulting in a heterogeneous clinical presentation. Each mouse model recapitulates limited aspects of lupus, especially in terms of the mechanism underlying disease progression. The main mouse models have been fairly successful for the evaluation of broad-acting immunosuppressants. However, the advent of targeted therapeutics calls for a selection of the most appropriate model(s) for testing and, ultimately, identification of patients who will be most likely to respond.

Targeted B cell therapies in the treatment of adult and pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus

Belimumab (Benlysta) is a fully-humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-lymphocyte stimulator (also known as B cell activating factor) and was approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration and European Medicines Evaluation Agency for treatment in adults with autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Rituximab (Rituxan) is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody targeting B lymphocytes. This review discusses the key findings of the phase III trials in adults with SLE and of real-world use of belimumab and rituximab in the care of both adult and pediatric SLE patients. It highlights the safety profile of belimumab and rituximab and gives insight into the consideration of these therapies for specific SLE disease states. It concludes with a discussion of the current clinical trials investigating B cell therapies in specific SLE disease states and a look to the future, with ongoing clinical trials.

Biologic Therapies for Autoimmune and Connective Tissue Diseases

Biologic therapy continues to revolutionize the treatment of autoimmune disease, especially in rheumatology as the pathophysiology of both inflammation and autoimmune disease becomes better understood. These therapies are designed to dampen the response of the inflammatory cascades. Although the first biologic therapies were approved many years ago, expanding indications and new agents continue to challenge the traditional treatment strategies for rheumatic diseases. This article reviews the data supporting the current use of biologic therapies, including off-label indications, in a subset of rheumatic diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, inflammatory myositis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, vasculitis, and gout.