1
|
Alba MA, Kermani TA, Unizony S, Murgia G, Prieto-González S, Salvarani C, Matteson EL. Relapses in giant cell arteritis: Updated review for clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev 2024; 23:103580. [PMID: 39048072 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common primary vasculitis in adults, is a granulomatous systemic vasculitis usually affecting the aorta and its major branches, particularly the carotid and vertebral arteries. Although remission can be achieved in most patients with GCA using high-dose glucocorticoids (GC), relapses are frequent, occurring in >40% of GC-only treated patients, mostly during the first two years after diagnosis. Relapsing courses lead to high GC exposure, increasing the risk of treatment-related adverse effects. Although tocilizumab is an efficacious GC-sparing therapy that allows increased sustained remission and reduced cumulative GC doses, relapses are common after drug discontinuation. This narrative review examines the most relevant features of relapses in GCA, including its definition, classification, frequency, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics, chronology, probable pathophysiology, and predictive factors. In addition, we discuss treatment options for relapsing patients and the effect of relapses on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco A Alba
- Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
| | - Tanaz A Kermani
- Division of Rheumatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sebastian Unizony
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Murgia
- Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergio Prieto-González
- Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlo Salvarani
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Eric L Matteson
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perez-Sancristobal I, Alvarez-Hernandez P, Lajas-Petisco C, Fernandez-Gutierrez B. Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA 2024; 20:108-112. [PMID: 38395494 DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106-114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n=42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone. RESULTS A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18-56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15-44] in patients with MTX (P=0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7±12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4±8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542-16.184; P=0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR. CONCLUSIONS These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cristina Lajas-Petisco
- UGC Reumatologia, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Javidan A, Benipal H, Vi L, Li A, Lee Y, Feridooni T, Alaichi J, Naji F. Assessing the robustness of positive vascular surgery randomized controlled trials using their fragility index. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:148-158.e3. [PMID: 37315910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of statistically significant findings in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by quantifying the minimum number of event conversions required to reverse a dichotomous outcome's statistical significance. In vascular surgery, many clinical guidelines and critical decision-making points are informed by a handful of key RCTs, especially regarding open surgical versus endovascular treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the FI of RCTs with statistically significant primary outcomes that compared open vs endovascular surgery in vascular surgery. METHODS In this meta-epidemiological study and systematic review, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs comparing open versus endovascular treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms, carotid artery stenosis, and peripheral arterial disease to December 2022. RCTs with statistically significant primary outcomes were included. Data screening and extraction were conducted in duplicate. The FI was calculated by adding an event to the group with the smaller number of events while subtracting a nonevent to the same group until Fisher's exact test produced a nonstatistically significant result. The primary outcome was the FI and proportion of outcomes where the loss to follow-up was greater than the FI. The secondary outcomes assessed the relationship of the FI to disease state, presence of commercial funding, and study design. RESULTS Overall, 5133 articles were captured in the initial search with 21 RCTs reporting 23 different primary outcomes being included in the final analysis. The median FI (first quartile, third quartile) was 3 (3, 20) with 16 outcomes (70%) reporting a loss to follow-up greater than its FI. Mann-Whitney U test revealed that commercially funded RCTs and composite outcomes had greater FIs (median, 20.0 [5.5, 24.5] vs median, 3.0 [2.0, 5.5], P = .035; median, 21 [8, 38] vs median, 3.0 [2.0, 8.5], P = .01, respectively). The FI did not vary between disease states (P = .285) or between index and follow-up trials (P = .147). There were significant correlations between the FI and P values (Pearson r = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.96), and the number of events (r = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). CONCLUSIONS A small number of event conversions (median, 3) are needed to alter the statistical significance of primary outcomes in vascular surgery RCTs evaluating open surgical and endovascular treatments. Most studies had loss to follow-up greater than its FI, which can call into question trial results, and commercially funded studies had a greater FI. The FI and these findings should be considered in future trial design in vascular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arshia Javidan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Harsukh Benipal
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Vi
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allen Li
- Faculty of Medicine/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Tiam Feridooni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacob Alaichi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faysal Naji
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murad MH, Kara Balla A, Khan MS, Shaikh A, Saadi S, Wang Z. Thresholds for interpreting the fragility index derived from sample of randomised controlled trials in cardiology: a meta-epidemiologic study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023; 28:133-136. [PMID: 35264405 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The fragility index (FI) was proposed as a simplified way to communicate robustness of statistically significant results and their susceptibility to a change of a handful number of events. While this index is intuitive, it is not anchored by a cut-off or a guide for interpretation. We identified cardiovascular trials published in six high impact journals from 2007 to 2021 (500 or more participants and a dichotomous statistically significant primary outcome). We estimated area under curve (AUC) to determine FI value that best predicts whether the treatment effect was precise, defined as adequately powered for a plausible relative risk reduction (RRR) of 25% or 30% or having a CI that is sufficiently narrow to exclude a risk reduction that is too small (close to the null, <0.05). The median FI of 201 included cardiovascular trials was 13 (range 1-172). FI exceeded the number of patients lost to follow-up in 46/201 (22.89%) trials. FI values of 19 and 22 predicted that trials would be precise (powered for RRR of 30% and 25%; respectively, combined with CI that excluded risk reduction <0.05). AUC for meeting these precision criteria was 0.90 (0.86-0.94). In conclusion, FI values that range 19-22 may meet various definitions of precision and can be used as a rule of thumb to suggest that a treatment effect is likely precise and less susceptible to random error. The number of patients lost to follow-up should be presented alongside FI to better illustrate fragility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hassan Murad
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Asim Shaikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Samer Saadi
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Zhen Wang
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mainbourg S, Tabary A, Cucherat M, Gueyffier F, Lobbes H, Aussedat M, Grenet G, Durieu I, Samson M, Lega JC. Indirect Comparison of Glucocorticoid-Sparing Agents for Remission Maintenance in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Network Meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97:1824-1835. [PMID: 35995627 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare and rank the effect of glucocorticoid-sparing agents in giant cell arteritis (GCA), for which several drugs have been evaluated but with a benefit-risk balance that remains uncertain. METHODS The MEDLINE and Clinical Trials databases were searched up to November 2021; all randomized controlled trials investigating glucocorticoids in GCA were included. The glucocorticoid regimen was dichotomized into short (≤6 months) or prolonged (>6 months) use. Risk of relapse and safety were estimated using network meta-analysis with frequentist random effects models. RESULTS Of the 96 records screened, 8 trials were included (572 patients). The trials compared glucocorticoids and a sparing agent: tocilizumab (2 trials), oral methotrexate (3 trials), infliximab (1 trial), etanercept (1 trial), and adalimumab (1 trial). The pooled prevalence of GCA relapse was 52.6% (95% CI, 38.1 to 66.9). The risk of relapse was significantly lower with tocilizumab compared with methotrexate (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.97) and prolonged (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and short (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.66) glucocorticoid use. The risk of relapse was not significantly different with methotrexate compared with short (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.31) and prolonged (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.31 to 2.89) glucocorticoid use. The frequency of serious adverse events and serious infection was comparable between the different drugs. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that tocilizumab may be superior to other sparing agents to prevent GCA relapse, but with a low to very low certainty of evidence, and that safety is comparable to the other drugs. REGISTRATION The protocol of the meta-analysis is registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration CRD42020112387).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Mainbourg
- Service de médecine interne et vasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Lyon immunopathology Federation (LIFe), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.
| | - Axel Tabary
- Service de médecine interne et vasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Michel Cucherat
- Service de pharmacotoxicologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Hervé Lobbes
- Service de médecine interne, Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Aussedat
- Service de court séjour gériatrique, Hôpital des Charpennes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Guillaume Grenet
- Service de pharmacotoxicologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Isabelle Durieu
- Service de médecine interne et vasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Health Services and Performance Research EA7425, Lyon, France
| | - Maxime Samson
- Service de médecine interne et d'immunologie clinique, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France
| | - Jean Christophe Lega
- Service de médecine interne et vasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Lyon immunopathology Federation (LIFe), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Intravenous tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis: a phase Ib dose-ranging pharmacokinetic bridging study. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:133. [PMID: 35659282 PMCID: PMC9166308 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02815-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ SC) is approved globally for giant cell arteritis (GCA). This phase Ib study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and exploratory efficacy of intravenous (IV) TCZ 6 and 7 mg/kg in patients with GCA. This study explored an IV dose resulting in a minimum exposure level within the range of effective trough concentrations achieved with TCZ SC dosing in GCA and not exceeding the exposure of the well-tolerated 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients with GCA who had received ≥ 5 doses of TCZ IV 8 mg/kg Q4W and achieved remission were enrolled. Patients received 5 doses of TCZ IV 7 mg/kg Q4W in period 1 and, if still in remission, 5 doses of 6 mg/kg Q4W in period 2. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were maximum concentration (Cmax), minimum concentration (Ctrough), area under the curve over a dosing interval (AUCτ), and mean concentration (Cmean) of TCZ after the last dose of each period. Other endpoints included pharmacodynamic markers, safety, and exploratory efficacy. Results In 24 patients, the median (range) age was 65.5 (57–90) years, and 62.5% were female. TCZ exposures (Cmax and AUCτ) were 11.2% and 20.0% lower at the 6- than 7-mg/kg dose. The mean interleukin 6 (IL-6) serum concentrations were elevated at baseline and remained elevated, with slightly higher concentrations in period 1 than in period 2. The mean serum soluble IL-6 receptor concentrations were elevated at baseline and comparable between the 2 doses at steady state. C-reactive protein levels and most erythrocyte sedimentation rates were within normal ranges throughout the study. Overall, 22 patients (91.7%) had ≥ 1 adverse event, and 4 (16.7%) had a serious adverse event. No patients experienced a GCA flare, and all remained in remission throughout the study. Conclusions Both doses of TCZ IV Q4W were generally well tolerated in patients with GCA. The Cmax and Cmean achieved with 6 mg/kg IV Q4W in patients with GCA were similar to those in patients with RA treated with 8 mg/kg IV Q4W, and Ctrough was within the range observed in patients with GCA treated with SC dosing every week or every 2 weeks. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03923738
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to large-sized vessels. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R). OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, given alone or with corticosteroids, compared with therapy without tocilizumab for treatment of GCA. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tocilizumab of any dosage regimen (alone or with corticosteroids) with therapy without tocilizumab that had a minimum follow-up of six months. Participants were at least 50 years of age, with biopsy-proven GCA or by large-vessel vasculitis by angiography, and met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 guidelines for GCA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS Main results We included two RCTs in the review. The studies were conducted in the USA, Canada, and Europe and enrolled a total of 281 participants with GCA, of whom 74% were women. The mean age of participants was 70 years, with new-onset or relapsing GCA, and fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria with no uncontrolled comorbidities. Both studies were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, the manufacturer of tocilizumab. Findings One RCT (30 participants) compared tocilizumab administered every four weeks versus placebo. Point estimates at 12 months and beyond favored tocilizumab over placebo in terms of sustained remission (risk ratio (RR) 4.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 14.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates suggest no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality at 12 months or more (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.94; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months, mean time to first relapse after induction of remission was 25 weeks in favor of participants receiving tocilizumab compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 25, 95% CI 11.4 to 38.6; moderate-certainty evidence). The second RCT (250 participants) randomized participants into two intervention and two comparator groups to receive tocilizumab weekly (100 participants), bi-weekly (49 participants), weekly placebo + 26-week taper (50 participants), or weekly placebo + 52-week taper (51 participants). At 12 months, point estimates from this study on proportion of participants with sustained remission favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.89; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.97 to 8.12; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.75; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.91; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates on proportion of participants who did not need escape therapy (defined by the study as the inability to keep to the protocol-defined prednisone taper) favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.35; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.78; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14; 100 participants) but not tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not report mean time to first relapse after induction of remission or all-cause mortality. Across comparison groups, the same study found no evidence of a difference in vision changes and inconsistent evidence with regard to quality of life. Evidence on quality of life as assessed by the physical (MD 8.17, 95% CI 4.44 to 11.90) and mental (MD 5.61, 95% CI 0.06 to 11.16) component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) favored weekly tocilizumab versus placebo + 52-week taper but not bi-weekly tocillizumab versus placebo + 26-week taper (moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events One RCT reported a lower percentage of participants who experienced serious adverse events when receiving tocilizumab every four weeks versus placebo. The second RCT reported no evidence of a difference among groups with regard to adverse events; however, fewer participants reported serious adverse events in the tocilizumab weekly and tocilizumab biweekly interventions compared with the placebo + 26-week taper and placebo + 52-week taper comparators. Investigators in both studies reported that infection was the most frequently reported adverse event. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review indicates that tocilizumab therapy may be beneficial in terms of proportion of participants with sustained remission, relapse-free survival, and the need for escape therapy. While the evidence was of moderate certainty, only two studies were included in the review, suggesting that further research is required to corroborate these findings. Future trials should address issues related to the required duration of therapy, patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and economic outcomes, as well as the clinical outcomes evaluated in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen A Antonio
- Hauenstein Neurosciences, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Ronel N Santos
- Hauenstein Neurosciences, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Samuel A Abariga
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061588. [PMID: 35329914 PMCID: PMC8954453 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis among elderly people. The clinical spectrum of the disease is heterogeneous, with a classic/cranial phenotype, and another extracranial or large vessel phenotype as the two more characteristic patterns. Permanent visual loss is the main short-term complication. Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the cornerstone of treatment. However, the percentage of relapses with GC alone is high, and the rate of adverse events affects more than 80% of patients, so it is necessary to have alternative therapeutic options, especially in patients with worse prognostic factors or high comorbidity. MTX is the only DMARD that has shown to reduce the cumulative dose of GC, while tocilizumab is the first biologic agent approved due to its ability to decrease the relapse rate and lower the cumulative GC doses. However, apart from the IL-6 pathway, there are other pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors involved in the typical intima hyperplasia and vascular remodeling of GCA. Among them, the more promising targets in GCA treatment are the IL12/IL23 axis antagonists, IL17 inhibitors, modulators of T lymphocytes, and inhibitors of either the JAK/STAT pathway, the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or the endothelin, all of which are updated in this review.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to large-sized vessels. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R). OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, given alone or with corticosteroids, compared with therapy without tocilizumab for treatment of GCA. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tocilizumab of any dosage regimen (alone or with corticosteroids) with therapy without tocilizumab that had a minimum follow-up of six months. Participants were at least 50 years of age, with biopsy-proven GCA or by large-vessel vasculitis by angiography, and met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 guidelines for GCA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS Main results We included two RCTs in the review. The studies were conducted in the USA, Canada, and Europe and enrolled a total of 281 participants with GCA, of whom 74% were women. The mean age of participants was 70 years, with new-onset or relapsing GCA, and fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria with no uncontrolled comorbidities. Both studies were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, the manufacturer of tocilizumab. Findings One RCT (30 participants) compared tocilizumab administered every four weeks versus placebo. Point estimates at 12 months and beyond favored tocilizumab over placebo in terms of sustained remission (risk ratio (RR) 4.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 14.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates suggest no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality at 12 months or more (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.94; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months, mean time to first relapse after induction of remission was 25 weeks in favor of participants receiving tocilizumab compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 25, 95% CI 11.4 to 38.6; moderate-certainty evidence). The second RCT (251 participants) randomized participants into two intervention and two comparator groups to receive tocilizumab weekly (100 participants), bi-weekly (49 participants), weekly placebo + 26-week taper (50 participants), or weekly placebo + 52-week taper (51 participants). At 12 months, point estimates from this study on proportion of participants with sustained remission favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.89; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.97 to 8.12; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.75; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.91; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates on proportion of participants who did not need escape therapy (defined by the study as the inability to keep to the protocol-defined prednisone taper) favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.35; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.78; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not report mean time to first relapse after induction of remission or all-cause mortality. The same study found no evidence of a difference between groups with regard to vision changes and quality of life, except for the assessment of quality of life with the physical component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which favored weekly tocilizumab versus placebo + 52-week taper (MD 8.17, 95% CI 4.44 to 11.90; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events One RCT reported a lower percentage of participants who experienced serious adverse events when receiving tocilizumab every four weeks versus placebo. The second RCT reported no evidence of a difference among groups with regard to adverse events; however, fewer participants reported serious adverse events in the tocilizumab weekly and tocilizumab biweekly interventions compared with the placebo + 26-week taper and placebo + 52-week taper comparators. Investigators in both studies reported that infection was the most frequently reported adverse event. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review indicates that tocilizumab therapy may be beneficial in terms of proportion of participants with sustained remission, relapse-free survival, and the need for escape therapy. While the evidence was of moderate certainty, only two studies were included in the review, suggesting that further research is required to corroborate these findings. Future trials should address issues related to the required duration of therapy, patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and economic outcomes, as well as the clinical outcomes evaluated in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen A Antonio
- Hauenstein Neurosciences, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Ronel N Santos
- Hauenstein Neurosciences, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Samuel A Abariga
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang H, Li J, Zeng W. Frequent fragility of randomized controlled trials for HCC treatment. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:389. [PMID: 33836710 PMCID: PMC8034173 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08133-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The fragility index (FI) of trial results can provide a measure of confidence in the positive effects reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this study was to calculate the FI of RCTs supporting HCC treatments. Methods A methodological systematic review of RCTs in HCC treatments was conducted. Two-arm studies with randomized and positive results for a time-to-event outcome were eligible for the FI calculation. Results A total of 6 trails were included in this analysis. The median FI was 0.5 (IQR 0–10). FI was ≤7 in 4 (66.7%) of 6 trials; in those trials the fragility quotient was ≤1%. Conclusion Many phase 3 RCTs supporting HCC treatments have a low FI, which challenges the confidence in concluding the superiority of these drugs over control treatments. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08133-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Key Discipline of Gguangdong Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, #151 Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jingtao Li
- Department of liver diseases (I), The Hospital Affiliated to Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi Province, China.
| | - Wenting Zeng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Key Discipline of Gguangdong Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, #151 Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Therkildsen P, de Thurah A, Hansen IT, Nørgaard M, Nielsen BD, Hauge EM. Giant cell arteritis: A nationwide, population-based cohort study on incidence, diagnostic imaging, and glucocorticoid treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 51:360-366. [PMID: 33601192 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study investigated the development over time of the incidence, diagnostic imaging, and treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHOD This nationwide, population-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark using medical and administrative registries. Incident GCA cases from 1996-2018 were defined as patients aged ≥50 years registered with a first-time GCA diagnosis and ≥3 prescriptions for glucocorticoids (GCs) within 6 months after diagnosis. We determined incidence rates of GCA, the proportion of patients still receiving GCs >2 years after diagnosis, the proportion of patients receiving temporal artery biopsies (TAB) and diagnostic imaging including ultrasound, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance, and/or computed tomography angiography at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS We identified 9908 incident GCA cases. The incidence rates of GCA remained stable at 19-25 per 100,000 people aged >50 years from 1996-2018. The proportion of GCA patients receiving a TAB remained constant until 2016, after which it promptly declined from 70-80% to 29-39%. In contrast, the proportion of patients receiving diagnostic imaging increased from 2% to 66% from 2000-2018. The proportion of GCA patients remaining in GC treatment has steadily decreased from 1996-2016, but remains high at 64%, 40%, and 34% after 2, 5, and 10 years following the diagnosis, respectively. The cumulative GC dose has remained relatively stable. CONCLUSION Incidence rates of GCA have remained stable since 1996 despite increasing use of diagnostic imaging. There is a clear discrepancy between current international GCA treatment guidelines and the clinical practice up to 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Therkildsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ib Tønder Hansen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette Nørgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ming C, Stack J. A case of fatal, relapsing GCA following one year of tocilizumab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:1777-1778. [PMID: 31821468 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Ming
- Rheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John Stack
- Rheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Evaluation of the fragility of pivotal trials used to support US Food and Drug Administration approval for plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 84:354-360. [PMID: 32320767 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last 5 years, there has been a rapid growth in the number of clinical trials used to support a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for systemic therapies with labeled indications for plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE We aim to evaluate the fragility of clinical trial data used to support FDA approval of therapies for psoriasis. METHODS We reviewed the primary endpoints of the pivotal trials of all systemic medications with a labeled indication for plaque psoriasis available from Drugs@FDA. RESULTS Sixty-nine clinical trial primary endpoints met inclusion criteria and were assessed for robustness, yielding a median fragility index of 72 and a median fragility quotient of 0.19. LIMITATIONS Efficacy and statistical analysis data for several approved medications were not available on the product label or on Drugs@FDA. CONCLUSIONS When compared with randomized controlled trials for FDA approval across various diseases, pivotal trials in psoriasis appear quite robust to changes in outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Derici Yıldırım D, Taşdelen B. Tanısal görüntüleme teknikleri kullanılan randomize kontrollü çalışmaların istatistiksel anlamlılığının kırılganlık indeksi ile değerlendirilmesi. CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.17826/cumj.512585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
15
|
Khan MS, Ochani RK, Shaikh A, Usman MS, Yamani N, Khan SU, Murad MH, Mandrola J, Doukky R, Krasuski RA. Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019; 12:e005755. [PMID: 31822121 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy of an intervention is commonly evaluated using P values, in addition to effect size measures such as absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and numbers needed to treat. However, these measures are not always intuitive to clinicians. The fragility index (FI) is a more intuitive number that can facilitate interpretation but can only be used with binary outcomes. FI is the minimum number of patients who must be moved from the nonevent group to the event group to turn a significant result nonsignificant. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the robustness of cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which report a positive (statistically significant) primary outcome by using the FI. METHODS AND RESULTS We searched Medline from 2007 to 2017 to identify cardiovascular RCTs published in 6 high impact journals (The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal). Only RCTs with sample sizes >500 and a 2-by-2 factorial design or dichotomous primary outcomes were selected. FI was calculated using a defined approach. Among the cohort of 123 RCTs that met inclusion criteria, median FI was 13 (interquartile range, 5-26). In 28 trials (22.8%), FI ranged between 1 and 4. In 37 trials (30.1%), number of patients lost to follow-up was higher than the FI. Pharmaceutical interventions had higher FI compared with other interventions, FI=19 (7-52; P=0.002). Median FI varied according to subspecialty (electrophysiology=2; heart failure=11; interventional cardiology=8; P=0.020) and multiregional RCTs had higher FI=22 (12-53.25; P=0.023). FI did not differ based on risk of bias indicators, funding, or publication year. CONCLUSIONS Considerable variations in FI were observed among cardiovascular trials, suggesting the need for careful interpretation of results, particularly when number of patients lost to follow-up exceeds FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL (M.S.K., N.Y.)
| | - Rohan Kumar Ochani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.)
| | - Asim Shaikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.)
| | - Muhammad Shariq Usman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (R.K.O., A.S., M.S.U.)
| | - Naser Yamani
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL (M.S.K., N.Y.)
| | - Safi U Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, West Virginia University (S.U.K.)
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.H.M.)
| | | | - Rami Doukky
- Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (R.D.)
| | - Richard A Krasuski
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (R.A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Valent F, Bond M, Cavallaro E, Treppo E, Rosalia Maria DR, Tullio A, Dejaco C, De Vita S, Quartuccio L. Data linkage analysis of giant cell arteritis in Italy: Healthcare burden and cost of illness in the Italian region of Friuli Venezia Giulia (2001-2017). Vasc Med 2019; 25:150-156. [PMID: 31804152 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x19886074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in adults. However, comprehensive analyses of the healthcare burden are still scarce. The aim of the study is to report the healthcare burden and cost of illness of GCA in the Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region of Italy, based on a data linkage analysis. To this end, a retrospective study was conducted through the integration of many administrative health databases of the FVG region as the source of information. Cases were identified from two verified, partially overlapping sources (the rare disease registry and medical exemption database). From 2001 to 2017, 208 patients with GCA were registered. The prevalence of GCA in the population aged ⩾ 45 years as of December 31, 2017 was 27.2/100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 23.5-31.4). The mean time of observation was 4.5 ± 3.6 years. A total of 3182 visits (338 per 100 patient-years) was recorded. The most frequent specialty visits were rheumatology (n = 610, 19.2%), followed by internal medicine (n = 564, 17.7%). A total of 287 hospitalizations (30 per 100 patient-years) were reported. A total of 13,043 prescriptions (1386 per 100 patient-years) were registered. More than half of the patients were prescribed an immunosuppressive agent. The overall estimated direct healthcare cost was €2,234,070, corresponding to €2374 per patient-year. Overall, GCA is a rare disease which implies a high healthcare cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Valent
- Institute of Epidemiology, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Udine, Italy
| | - Milena Bond
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Elena Cavallaro
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Elena Treppo
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Da Riol Rosalia Maria
- Regional Centre for Rare Diseases, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Udine, Italy
| | - Annarita Tullio
- Institute of Epidemiology, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Udine, Italy
| | - Christian Dejaco
- Rheumatology Unit, Brunico Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.,Rheumatology Department, Medical University Graz, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Salvatore De Vita
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Luca Quartuccio
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20:e258-e262. [PMID: 31013262 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Fragility Index measures the number of events on which the statistical significance of a result depends and has been suggested as an adjunct statistical assessment for interpretation of trial results. This study aimed to assess the robustness of statistically significant results from pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes. DATA SOURCES A previously published scoping review of pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials (www.PICUtrials.net). STUDY SELECTION A total of 342 trials were screened for inclusion. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 43 fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. DATA EXTRACTION Calculation of Fragility Index for trials reporting a statistically significant dichotomous outcome, and analysis of the relationship between trial characteristics and Fragility Index. DATA SYNTHESIS The median Fragility Index was 2 (interquartile range, 1-6). The median sample size was 98 (interquartile range, 50-148) and sample size demonstrated a strong correlation with the Fragility Index (r = 0.729; n = 43; p < 0.001). The median number of outcome events was 8 (interquartile range, 4-15) and the total number of outcome events also showed a strong correlation with the Fragility Index (r = 0.728; n = 43; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Results from pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes reporting statistically significant findings often hinge on a small number of outcome events. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting results of trials with a low Fragility Index.
Collapse
|
18
|
Aging in Primary Systemic Vasculitis: Implications for Diagnosis, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Drugs Aging 2018; 36:53-63. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0617-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
19
|
Does leflunomide have a role in giant cell arteritis? An open-label study. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 38:291-296. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4232-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|