Checkpoint: Inspecting the barriers in glioblastoma immunotherapies

GPR65 contributes to constructing immunosuppressive microenvironment in glioma

Glioma, especially glioblastoma patients, present highly heterogeneous and immunosuppressive microenvironment, leading to their poor response to treatment and survival. Targeting the tumor microenvironment is considered a promising therapeutic strategy. M2 macrophages are highly infiltrated in glioma tissue, even up to 50% of the total number of bulk tissue cells. Here, we identified GPR65 as the hub gene of the M2 macrophage-related module in glioma through WGCNA analysis. The expression and prognosis analysis suggested that GPR65 was positively correlated with the malignancy and poor prognosis of glioma, and the heterogeneity analysis found that GPR65 was highly expressed in the vascular proliferation area of glioma, which matched the spatial expression characteristics of M2 macrophages. We further verified that GPR65 was highly expressed in macrophages but not tumor cells in the glioma microenvironment by single-cell data analysis and immunofluorescence. Most importantly, we found that inhibition of GPR65 was sufficient to reduce macrophages' polarization response to glioma cell and break the malignant cooperation with glioma cells. Our study reports the expression characteristics and malignant behavior of GPR65 in the glioma microenvironment, which provides a new alternative target of treatment to glioma microenvironment.

TCAF2 drives glioma cellular migratory/invasion properties through STAT3 signaling

Glioma is an intracranial tumor characterized by high mortality and recurrence rates. In the present study, the association of TRPM8 channel-associated factor 2 (TCAF2) in glioma was investigated using bioinformatics, showing significant relationships with age, WHO grade, IDH, and 1p/19q status, as well as being an independent predictor of prognosis. Immunohistochemistry of a glioma sample microarray showed markedly increased TCAF2 expression in glioblastoma relative to lower-grade glioma, with elevated expression predominating in the tumor center. Raised TCAF2 levels promote glioma cell migratory/invasion properties through the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like (EMT-like) process, shown by Transwell and scratch assays and western blotting. It was further found that the effects of TCAF2 were mediated by the activation of STAT3. These results suggest that TCAF2 promotes glioma cell migration and invasion, rendering it a potential drug target in glioma therapy.

Understanding the immunosuppressive microenvironment of glioma: mechanistic insights and clinical perspectives

Glioblastoma (GBM), the predominant and primary malignant intracranial tumor, poses a formidable challenge due to its immunosuppressive microenvironment, thereby confounding conventional therapeutic interventions. Despite the established treatment regimen comprising surgical intervention, radiotherapy, temozolomide administration, and the exploration of emerging modalities such as immunotherapy and integration of medicine and engineering technology therapy, the efficacy of these approaches remains constrained, resulting in suboptimal prognostic outcomes. In recent years, intensive scrutiny of the inhibitory and immunosuppressive milieu within GBM has underscored the significance of cellular constituents of the GBM microenvironment and their interactions with malignant cells and neurons. Novel immune and targeted therapy strategies have emerged, offering promising avenues for advancing GBM treatment. One pivotal mechanism orchestrating immunosuppression in GBM involves the aggregation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), glioma-associated macrophage/microglia (GAM), and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Among these, MDSCs, though constituting a minority (4-8%) of CD45+ cells in GBM, play a central component in fostering immune evasion and propelling tumor progression, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. MDSCs deploy intricate immunosuppressive mechanisms that adapt to the dynamic tumor microenvironment (TME). Understanding the interplay between GBM and MDSCs provides a compelling basis for therapeutic interventions. This review seeks to elucidate the immune regulatory mechanisms inherent in the GBM microenvironment, explore existing therapeutic targets, and consolidate recent insights into MDSC induction and their contribution to GBM immunosuppression. Additionally, the review comprehensively surveys ongoing clinical trials and potential treatment strategies, envisioning a future where targeting MDSCs could reshape the immune landscape of GBM. Through the synergistic integration of immunotherapy with other therapeutic modalities, this approach can establish a multidisciplinary, multi-target paradigm, ultimately improving the prognosis and quality of life in patients with GBM.

Uniting innate and adaptive immunity in glioblastoma; an α-CTLA-4 quest

Immunotherapies have thus far led to disappointing outcomes in patients suffering from glioblastoma. Published in Immunity, Chen et al.'s recent study shows the therapeutic potential of an αCTLA-4 antibody (Ab), specifically in murine mesenchymal-like glioblastoma. αCTLA-4 Ab efficacy relied on the distinctive cooperation between CD4+ Th1 T cells and microglia, unleashing a potent antitumor response.

Tumor-suppressive function and mechanism of miR-873-5p in glioblastoma: evidence based on bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation

This study aims to clarify the mechanistic actions of microRNA-873-5p (miR-873-5p) on glioblastoma (GBM) progression. The most differentially expressed miRNAs were retrieved from the GEO database. It was established that miR-873-5p was downregulated in GBM tissues and cells. Based on in silico prediction and experimental data, HMOX1 was demonstrated to be a target gene of miR-873-5p. Further, miR-873-5p was then ectopically expressed in GBM cells to examine its effect on the malignant behaviors of GBM cells. Overexpression of miR-873-5p inhibited GBM cell proliferation and invasion by targeting HMOX1. HMOX1 promoted SPOP expression by increasing HIF1α expression, thus stimulating GBM cell malignant phenotypes. miR-873-5p suppressed the malignant phenotypes of GBM cells and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting the HMOX1/HIF1α/SPOP signaling axis. This study uncovers a novel miR-873-5p/HMOX1/HIF1α/SPOP axis in GBM, providing new insights into GBM progression and therapeutic targets for GBM treatment.

Precision medicine advancements in glioblastoma: A systematic review

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme, commonly known as GBM or glioblastoma is a grade IV astrocytoma. Brain tumors are difficult to treat and lead to poor prognosis and survival in patients. Gliomas are categorized into four different grades among which GBM is the worst grade primary brain tumor with a survival of less than a year. The genomic heterogeneity of the brain tumor results in different profiles for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Precision medicine focuses on this specific tumor type and suggests specialized treatment for better prognosis and overall survival (OS).

Purpose

With the recent advancements in Genome-Wide Studies (GWS) and various characterizations of brain tumors based on genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenetic, and metabolomics, this review discusses the advancements and opportunities of precision medicine therapeutics, drugs, and diagnosis methods based on the different profiles of glioblastoma.

Methods

This review has exhaustively surveyed several pieces of works from various literature databases.

Conclusion

It is evident that most primary brain tumors including glioblastoma require specific and precision therapeutics for better prognosis and OS. In present and future, molecular understanding and discovering specific therapies are essential for treatment in the field of neurooncology.

Brain-Targeted HFn-Cu-REGO Nanoplatform for Site-Specific Delivery and Manipulation of Autophagy and Cuproptosis in Glioblastoma

Durable glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) management requires long-term chemotherapy after surgery to eliminate remaining cancerous tissues. Among chemotherapeutics, temozolomide is considered as the first-line drug for GBM therapy, but the treatment outcome is not satisfactory. Notably, regorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, has been reported to exert a markedly superior effect on GBM suppression compared with temozolomide. However, poor site-specific delivery and bioavailability significantly restrict the efficient permeability of regorafenib to brain lesions and compromise its treatment efficacy. Therefore, human H-ferritin (HFn), regorafenib, and Cu²⁺ are rationally designed as a brain-targeted nanoplatform (HFn-Cu-REGO NPs), fulfilling the task of site-specific delivery and manipulating autophagy and cuproptosis against GBM. Herein, HFn affords a preferential accumulation capacity to GBM due to transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1)-mediated active targeting and pH-responsive delivery behavior. Moreover, regorafenib can inhibit autophagosome-lysosome fusion, resulting in lethal autophagy arrest in GBM cells. Furthermore, Cu²⁺ not only facilitates the encapsulation of regorafenib to HFn through coordination interaction but also disturbs copper homeostasis for triggering cuproptosis, resulting in a synergistical effect with regorafenib-mediated lethal autophagy arrest against GBM. Therefore, this work may broaden the clinical application scope of Cu²⁺ and regorafenib in GBM treatment via modulating autophagy and cuproptosis.

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Concomitant with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Are Therapeutically Effective in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) In Vivo Model

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that exert physical forces to disrupt cellular processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression. TTFields induce anti-mitotic effects through the disruption of the mitotic spindle and abnormal chromosome segregation, which trigger several forms of cell death, including immunogenic cell death (ICD). The efficacy of TTFields concomitant with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) treatment was previously shown in vivo and is currently under clinical investigation. Here, the potential of TTFields concomitant with anti- PD-1/anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to improve therapeutic efficacy was examined in lung tumor-bearing mice. Increased circulating levels of high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) and elevated intratumoral levels of phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α) were found in the TTFields-treated mice, indicative of ICD induction. The concomitant application of TTFields and ICI led to a significant decrease in tumor volume as compared to all other groups. In addition, significant increases in the number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, specifically cytotoxic T-cells, were observed in the TTFields plus anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-L1 groups. Correspondingly, cytotoxic T-cells isolated from these tumors showed higher levels of IFN-γ production. Collectively, these results suggest that TTFields have an immunoactivating role that may be leveraged for concomitant treatment with ICI to achieve better tumor control by enhancing antitumor immunity.

Combinatorial approaches to effective therapy in glioblastoma (GBM): Current status and what the future holds

The aggressive and recurrent nature of glioblastoma is multifactorial and has been attributed to its biological heterogeneity, dysfunctional metabolic signaling pathways, rigid blood-brain barrier, inherent resistance to standard therapy due to the stemness property of the gliomas cells, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, hypoxia and neoangiogenesis which are very well orchestrated and create the tumor's own highly pro-tumorigenic milieu. Once the relay of events starts amongst these components, eventually it becomes difficult to control the cascade using only the balanced contemporary care of treatment consisting of maximal resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with temozolamide. Over the past few decades, implementation of contemporary treatment modalities has shown benefit to some extent, but no significant overall survival benefit is achieved. Therefore, there is an unmet need for advanced multifaceted combinatorial strategies. Recent advances in molecular biology, development of innovative therapeutics and novel delivery platforms over the years has resulted in a paradigm shift in gliomas therapeutics. Decades of research has led to emergence of several treatment molecules, including immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic virotherapy, adoptive cell therapy, nanoparticles, CED and BNCT, each with the unique proficiency to overcome the mentioned challenges, present research. Recent years are seeing innovative combinatorial strategies to overcome the multifactorial resistance put forth by the GBM cell and its TME. This review discusses the contemporary and the investigational combinatorial strategies being employed to treat GBM and summarizes the evidence accumulated till date.

Comprehensive Analyses of Ferroptosis-Related Alterations and Their Prognostic Significance in Glioblastoma

Background: This study was designed to explore the implications of ferroptosis-related alterations in glioblastoma patients.

Method: After obtaining the data sets CGGA325, CGGA623, TCGA-GBM, and GSE83300 online, extensive analysis and mutual verification were performed using R language-based analytic technology, followed by further immunohistochemistry staining verification utilizing clinical pathological tissues.

Results: The analysis revealed a substantial difference in the expression of ferroptosis-related genes between malignant and paracancerous samples, which was compatible with immunohistochemistry staining results from clinicopathological samples. Three distinct clustering studies were run sequentially on these data. All of the findings were consistent and had a high prediction value for glioblastoma. Then, the risk score predicting model containing 23 genes (CP, EMP1, AKR1C1, FMOD, MYBPH, IFI30, SRPX2, PDLIM1, MMP19, SPOCD1, FCGBP, NAMPT, SLC11A1, S100A10, TNC, CSMD3, ATP1A2, CUX2, GALNT9, TNFAIP6, C15orf48, WSCD2, and CBLN1) on the basis of “Ferroptosis.gene.cluster” was constructed. In the subsequent correlation analysis of clinical characteristics, tumor mutation burden, HRD, neoantigen burden and chromosomal instability, mRNAsi, TIDE, and GDSC, all the results indicated that the risk score model might have a better predictive efficiency.

Conclusion: In glioblastoma, there were a large number of abnormal ferroptosis-related alterations, which were significant for the prognosis of patients. The risk score-predicting model integrating 23 genes would have a higher predictive value.

Delivering Glioblastoma a Kick-DGKα Inhibition as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for GBM

Diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) inhibition may be particularly relevant for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), a relatively common brain malignancy incurable with current therapies. Prior reports have shown that DGKα inhibition has multiple direct activities against GBM cells, including suppressing the oncogenic pathways mTOR and HIF-1α. It also inhibits pathways associated with the normally treatment-resistant mesenchymal phenotype, yielding preferential activity against mesenchymal GBM; this suggests possible utility in combining DGKα inhibition with radiation and other therapies for which the mesenchymal phenotype promotes resistance. The potential for DGKα inhibition to block or reverse T cell anergy also suggests the potential of DGKα inhibition to boost immunotherapy against GBM, which is generally considered an immunologically "cold" tumor. A recent report indicates that DGKα deficiency increases responsiveness of macrophages, indicating that DGKα inhibition could also have the potential to boost macrophage and microglia activity against GBM-which could be a particularly promising approach given the heavy infiltration of these cells in GBM. DGKα inhibition may therefore offer a promising multi-pronged attack on GBM, with multiple direct anti-GBM activities and also the ability to boost both adaptive and innate immune responses against GBM. However, both the direct and indirect benefits of DGKα inhibition for GBM will likely require combinations with other therapies to achieve meaningful efficacy. Furthermore, GBM offers other challenges for the application of DGKα inhibitors, including decreased accessibility from the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The ideal DGKα inhibitor for GBM will combine potency, specificity, and BBB penetrability. No existing inhibitor is known to meet all these criteria, but the strong potential of DGKα inhibition against this lethal brain cancer should help drive development and testing of agents to bring this promising strategy to the clinic for patients with GBM.